1 jae k. park energy in water and wastewater treatment plants

26
Jae K. Park Energy in Water and Wastewater Treatment Plants

Upload: bruce-jones

Post on 18-Jan-2016

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 Jae K. Park Energy in Water and Wastewater Treatment Plants

1

Jae K. Park

Energy in Water and Wastewater Treatment Plants

Page 2: 1 Jae K. Park Energy in Water and Wastewater Treatment Plants

2

Energy CostMunicipal wastewater treatment plant can see

up to 40~55% of their operating budget dedicated to energy.

Industrial wastewater plants can see up to 70% of their operating budgets spent on energy.

WTPs and WWTPs account for approximately 3% of the electric load in the United States.

As populations grow and environmental requirements become more stringent, demand for electricity at such plants is expected to grow by approximately 20% over the next 15 years (Carns 2005).

Page 3: 1 Jae K. Park Energy in Water and Wastewater Treatment Plants

3

Energy CostEnergy represents a substantial and rising cost

to water and wastewater utilities.In recent survey of utility directors, energy cost

was rated as one of the top five long term concerns

Many utilities are implementing energy management and cost control programs.

New technologies in drinking water treatment are more energy intensive

In wastewater treatment, older conventional technologies are given way to lower energy options

Page 4: 1 Jae K. Park Energy in Water and Wastewater Treatment Plants

4

Wisconsin Energy UsageEnergy cost (% of total expenses): 10.5%

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 20080

2

4

6

8

10

12

Pur

chas

ed p

ower

(kW

h/10

00 g

al)

Wastewater

Water

http://dnr.wi.gov/environmentprotect/gtfgw/documents/MhTF20080501.pdf

Page 5: 1 Jae K. Park Energy in Water and Wastewater Treatment Plants

5

Electricity Bill Two methods

By the amount of energy used over a specific period (kilowatt-hours)

By demand, the rate of the flow of energy (kilowatts)

Electric utilities structure their rates on the basis of the user’s required voltage level, the electricity usage at different hours of the day, and the peak demand. A WWTP might be operating equipment when electricity is at peak rates, resulting in unnecessary costs.

Plant personnel should become familiar with the energy rate structure to determine whether they can operate equipment at off-peak hours or reduce energy consumption during peak-demand hours.

Page 6: 1 Jae K. Park Energy in Water and Wastewater Treatment Plants

6

Industrial Electricity Bill StructureEnergy charge Similar to flat rate Pays for each killowatt-hour of electrical energy

used Off-peak and on-peak rates

Demand or capacity charge A dollar amount usually based on the highest

"power" demand by the user in any hour of the previous month or quarter or year.

e.g., :Don't start all the motors in the plant at the same time, and let's generate some or all of our own electricity!”

Page 7: 1 Jae K. Park Energy in Water and Wastewater Treatment Plants

7

Technology ShiftWater/wastewater reuse is growing also

increasing use of energy intensive technologies:Membrane BioreactorsReverse OsmosisUltra and Micro FiltrationUltraviolet disinfection

Reuse of wastewater allows us to use water wisely and more effectively but can result in an additional 20~40% increase in energy use over conventional treatment methods

Page 8: 1 Jae K. Park Energy in Water and Wastewater Treatment Plants

8

Ultra- and Micro-FiltrationTreat wastewater resulting in high quality

effluent but increase energy use by 10%.

Page 9: 1 Jae K. Park Energy in Water and Wastewater Treatment Plants

9

UV and OzoneOzone and UV provide significant water quality

benefits but consume from 100 to 400% more energy than traditional treatment methods.

Page 10: 1 Jae K. Park Energy in Water and Wastewater Treatment Plants

10

Reverse Osmosis An effective method for desalting sea water and reuse

of wastewater, but requires 500% more energy than conventional water or wastewater treatment.

Page 11: 1 Jae K. Park Energy in Water and Wastewater Treatment Plants

11

Effective Energy ManagementLike most initiatives, successful energy

management depends on good people.Energy management is a cultural thing.Significant quick wins can be achieved with

minor organizational change and new business practices.

Consider ‘supply and demand’ in energy management program.

Page 12: 1 Jae K. Park Energy in Water and Wastewater Treatment Plants

12

Effective Energy Management- continued

In many cases, largest savings come through real-time optimization using SCADA.

Diligence in operations is required for continuous improvement in energy management.

Energy management is a continuous operational process.

Setting & tracking goals is key to successful energy management.

Page 13: 1 Jae K. Park Energy in Water and Wastewater Treatment Plants

13

Ways of Reducing Energy CostsReview the power rate for each stationReduce demand chargesKnow when the station power meter is readDedicate a staff member to monitor the

power billsTake advantage of time-of-use metering

Page 14: 1 Jae K. Park Energy in Water and Wastewater Treatment Plants

14

Additional Consideration forReducing Power Optimization

Analyze pump stations for pressures, flows, and storage requirements for peak operational demands and fire/emergency requirements.

An opportunity may exist for reducing the storage if there is excessive storage.

The impeller can be trimmed if there is surplus pump discharge pressure.

It may be more cost effective to install soft starts or VFD (variable frequency drives) at major power users.

Page 15: 1 Jae K. Park Energy in Water and Wastewater Treatment Plants

15

Organizational ProcessesOperate pumps and valves to minimize energy

costs & use.Develop the system operating plan.Measure system performance, respond to events

and update the plan.

Page 16: 1 Jae K. Park Energy in Water and Wastewater Treatment Plants

16

Key Components of Energy Management Plan

Create a system to track energy usage and costsPerform energy audits of major operationsUpgrade equipment, systems, and controls,

including facility and collection system improvements to increase energy efficiency

Develop a cost-effective electric supply purchasing strategy

Optimize load profiles by shifting operations where possible

Develop in-house energy management training for operators

Page 17: 1 Jae K. Park Energy in Water and Wastewater Treatment Plants

17

Example Modifications - 1100-horsepower surface aerator replaced with a

25-horsepower subsurface aerator. An aerated grit chamber that used

approximately 2,900 megawatts per year replaced with a vortex system.

Installed high-efficiency influent and effluent pumps, high-efficiency motors, and variable-frequency drives.

Discontinuing second-stage activated-sludge mixing.

Page 18: 1 Jae K. Park Energy in Water and Wastewater Treatment Plants

18

Example Modifications - 2Add plastic balls to prevent heat loss and

evaporation losses in the oxygen production vaporizer pit.

Tie in pipes on gas recirculation blowers to allow one blower to service two mixing tanks.

Installed high-efficiency influent and effluent pumps, high-efficiency motors, and variable-frequency drives

As a result, an estimated annual savings of $2,796,000 (California Energy Commission, EBMUD Case Study, 2003) or energy savings of approximately 70% per year achieved.

Page 19: 1 Jae K. Park Energy in Water and Wastewater Treatment Plants

19

Example Modifications - 3Installation of an equalization basin allows the

plant to even out pumping needs, and so allows for “peak shaving” by running pumps during off-peak hours

Reducing infiltration and inflow in the collection system also can pay for itself in energy savings. By rehabilitating damaged or deteriorated sewer lines and eliminating improper connections to the system, the overall flow to the WWTP is reduced, thus reducing the amount of energy required to treat the flows.

Installation of Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system.

Page 20: 1 Jae K. Park Energy in Water and Wastewater Treatment Plants

20

Auxiliary and Supplemental Power Sources (ASPS) or Energy Recovery Equipment

Cogenerate electricity and thermal energy on site. Capture and use anaerobic digester gas (or bio-gas). Ex.

EBMUD: Generates 50% of energy needs, $1.7 million savings annually.

Bio-gas fueled internal combustion engines, microturbines, wind turbines, fuel cells, and solar cells.

Some ASPS available do not conserve energy but replace off-site generation with on-site generation.

The city of Pacifica, California, began operating 1,800 solar panels to supply a portion of the Calera Creek Water Recycling Plant’s electric needs. The solar panels provide 10 to 15% of the treatment plant’s energy needs. The facility estimates $100,000 per year in energy savings (Manekin, 2006).

20

Page 21: 1 Jae K. Park Energy in Water and Wastewater Treatment Plants

21

Example Modifications – 4Industrial Application

21

Page 22: 1 Jae K. Park Energy in Water and Wastewater Treatment Plants

22

Helixchanger®

A high efficiency heat exchanger and a proprietary product

Quadrant-shaped plate baffles are placed at an angle to the tube axis in a sequential arrangement to create a helical flow pattern. The helical flow offers improved thermal effectiveness, enhanced heat transfer, reduced pressure drop, lower fouling, and significantly reduced vibration hazards.

Page 23: 1 Jae K. Park Energy in Water and Wastewater Treatment Plants

23

Microturbines

Background reading materials: http://www.energy.ca.gov/distgen/equipment/microturbines/microturbines.html

Page 24: 1 Jae K. Park Energy in Water and Wastewater Treatment Plants

24

Fuel CellAn electrochemical energy conversion deviceWorks by a catalyst such as a platinum group metal

or alloyReplacement for diesel generatorsBackground reading materials

http://www.fuelcells.org/

Page 25: 1 Jae K. Park Energy in Water and Wastewater Treatment Plants

25

WWTP in Amman, Jordan

Approach used to tackle energy issues

25

Page 26: 1 Jae K. Park Energy in Water and Wastewater Treatment Plants

26

Summary Serving for 2.2 million people

Qaverage = 267,000 m3/dayQmax = 530,000 m3/day

Hydraulic turbines upstream and downstream and gas turbines powered by methane gas from anaerobic digesters: 95% of the electricity required for the plant

Contract signed between the Samra Plant Company (owned by SUEZ ENVIRONNEMENT, Infilco Degrémont Inc. and The Morganti Group Inc.) and the Jordanian Government, represented by the Ministry of Water and Irrigation: design, financing, construction and 22-year operation of the treatment plant for a price of USD169 million.