1 jan eldred karen w. linkins lisa mangiante december 10, 2008
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: 1 Jan Eldred Karen W. Linkins Lisa Mangiante December 10, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072014/56649e795503460f94b792bf/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
Jan EldredKaren W. LinkinsLisa Mangiante
December 10, 2008
![Page 2: 1 Jan Eldred Karen W. Linkins Lisa Mangiante December 10, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072014/56649e795503460f94b792bf/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Overview of the Initiative
Five year project funded by The California Endowment and the California HealthCare Foundation, based at Corporation for Supportive Housing California Program
The issue – emergency rooms are inundated with large numbers of patients, many of whom have complex, unmet needs not effectively dealt with in acute care settings
Create a more responsive system of care that proactively– Addresses patients’ need and produces better health outcomes
– Frees up emergency department resources for acute medical crises
![Page 3: 1 Jan Eldred Karen W. Linkins Lisa Mangiante December 10, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072014/56649e795503460f94b792bf/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Who Are Frequent Users?
65% chronic illness (diabetes, cardiovascular disease, chronic pain, cirrhosis & other liver disease, asthma & other respiratory disease, seizures, Hepatitis C, and HIV)
53% substance use issues (alcohol, methamphetamines, crack/cocaine, heroin, prescription drugs)
45% homeless, living on the streets
32% mental illness (Axis I and II)
36% have 3+ of these presenting conditions
![Page 4: 1 Jan Eldred Karen W. Linkins Lisa Mangiante December 10, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072014/56649e795503460f94b792bf/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
The Challenge
Disproportionate use by small number of patients
Most use is avoidable– 8.9 ED visits each annually, with average annual charges of
$13,000 per patient– 1.3 hospital admissions annually– 5.8 inpatient days each, with average annual charges of
$45,000 per patient
Episodic, hospital-based care doesn’t effectively meet the multiple, complex needs
![Page 5: 1 Jan Eldred Karen W. Linkins Lisa Mangiante December 10, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072014/56649e795503460f94b792bf/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
The Models
6 counties, 6 programs (partnerships of hospitals, health/human service, housing, behavioral health, criminal justice)
5 intensive case management, 1 brief peer intervention
3 hospital-based, 3 community-based Various team compositions ranging from peer
counselors and paraprofessionals to multidisciplinary teams – one with social workers and nurses and the ability to bill for direct services
![Page 6: 1 Jan Eldred Karen W. Linkins Lisa Mangiante December 10, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072014/56649e795503460f94b792bf/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Frequent User Case Management
Key elements Connect patients to both medical and non-medical
services (e.g., primary care, mental health, drug and
alcohol treatment, housing, transportation) Intensive individual support, especially initially Coordination of care Effective linkages between case managers and ED
![Page 7: 1 Jan Eldred Karen W. Linkins Lisa Mangiante December 10, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072014/56649e795503460f94b792bf/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Policy Impact
Increased awareness of frequent users and commitment to address high cost, ineffective utilization patterns
Other initiatives in place that affect some frequent users – Coverage Initiative—expands healthcare to some uninsured (10 counties)– Mental Health Services Act — provides funding to county mental health departments for services
to people w/ serious and persistent mental illness– Coordinated Care Management Program — pilot to reimburse for services to low income people
with medical illness and serious and persistent mental illness in some counties
SB 1738 (2008) Passed both houses with bi-partisan support but vetoed by Governor (prefers “statewide solution”)
Victories: universal agreement on the approach, belief in the data, and Administration and stakeholder commitment to work together next year
![Page 8: 1 Jan Eldred Karen W. Linkins Lisa Mangiante December 10, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072014/56649e795503460f94b792bf/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Local Accomplishments
Most Initiative programs self-sustaining
Broader adoption of case management & multidisciplinary care
Increased collaboration to improve service delivery:– frequent user programs and supportive housing– FQHCs and hospitals– health and mental health agencies, health agencies and jails
Increased focus on benefits advocacy
Collaborative planning of community initiatives for overlapping populations:
– Medical respite for homeless patients– Coverage Initiative for uninsured Californians– 10 year plans to end homelessness
![Page 9: 1 Jan Eldred Karen W. Linkins Lisa Mangiante December 10, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072014/56649e795503460f94b792bf/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Outcomes: Connections to Housing, Health, and Income Benefits
Clients homeless at enrollment:– 34% connected to permanent housing
Clients connected to health benefits:– 68% Medicaid applications approved
Clients connected to SSI:– 53% SSI applications approved
![Page 10: 1 Jan Eldred Karen W. Linkins Lisa Mangiante December 10, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072014/56649e795503460f94b792bf/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Outcomes: Hospital Utilization & Charges
Per Person 1 Year PRE
2 Years POST
% DIFFERENCE
Average ED Visits 10.3 4 61% decrease
Average ED Charges $11,388 $4,697 59% decrease
Inpatient Admissions 1.5 0.5 64% decrease
Avg. Inpatient Days 6.3 2.4 62% decrease
Avg. Inpatient Charges
$46,826 $14,684 69% decrease
![Page 11: 1 Jan Eldred Karen W. Linkins Lisa Mangiante December 10, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072014/56649e795503460f94b792bf/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
More information
For more information about the Initiative or to download the Frequent Users of Health Services Initiative: Final Evaluation Report, visit:
www.frequenthealthusers.org