1 john l. campbell june 10, 2013 managing a shrp2 naturalistic driving study in the puget sound...

21
1 John L. Campbell June 10, 2013 Managing a SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving Study in the Puget Sound Region Presentation at the 2013 ITE-WA Annual Meeting & Conference

Upload: maude-king

Post on 11-Jan-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 John L. Campbell June 10, 2013 Managing a SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving Study in the Puget Sound Region Presentation at the 2013 ITE-WA Annual Meeting &

1

John L. Campbell

June 10, 2013

Managing a SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving Study in the Puget Sound Region

Presentation at the 2013 ITE-WA Annual Meeting & Conference

Page 2: 1 John L. Campbell June 10, 2013 Managing a SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving Study in the Puget Sound Region Presentation at the 2013 ITE-WA Annual Meeting &

2

• Overview of the Naturalistic Driving Study (NDS)• Objectives• Test Sites

• Overview of the Seattle Data Collection Site• Key Tasks• The Battelle Team• Recruitment Boundaries

• Participant Pipeline• Recruit Schedule Install• Intake and Installation Process• Equipment Installed into Participant Vehicles

• Progress to Date Recruit Schedule Install• Locations of Participants• DAS Installation & Total Intake Times

• Benefits of the Study

Discussion Topics

Page 3: 1 John L. Campbell June 10, 2013 Managing a SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving Study in the Puget Sound Region Presentation at the 2013 ITE-WA Annual Meeting &

3

Overview of the NDS

Goals

• Address the role of driver performance and behavior in traffic safety.

• This includes developing an understanding of how the driver interacts with and adapts to the vehicle, traffic environment, roadway characteristics, traffic control devices, and the environment.

• It also includes assessing the changes in collision risk associated with each of these factors and interactions.

• This information will support the development of new and improved countermeasures with greater effectiveness.

• Includes everyday driving data from ≈ 3000 drivers, male and female, 16 - 76+, for 1 or 2 years each

Page 4: 1 John L. Campbell June 10, 2013 Managing a SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving Study in the Puget Sound Region Presentation at the 2013 ITE-WA Annual Meeting &

4

Overview of the NDS

What types of data are being collected?

• video images - 4 cameras (forward, rear, 2, in cab)• rates of acceleration, • lateral and vertical motion, • the presence of alcohol within the cabin, • position information, • turn signal actuation,• steering wheel angle, • speed, • seat belt use and air bag deployment • forward radar

• Separately, data will also be collected on roadway elements such as road type, geometry, shoulders, safety furniture, signage, pavement markings, and more for the roads most frequently used by the volunteer drivers.

• Crash investigations are also conducted

Page 5: 1 John L. Campbell June 10, 2013 Managing a SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving Study in the Puget Sound Region Presentation at the 2013 ITE-WA Annual Meeting &

5

6 National Test SitesSelected sites include Tampa, Florida; central Indiana; Durham, North Carolina; Erie County, New York; central Pennsylvania, and Seattle, Washington.

Page 6: 1 John L. Campbell June 10, 2013 Managing a SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving Study in the Puget Sound Region Presentation at the 2013 ITE-WA Annual Meeting &

6

Seattle - Site Characteristics

• Mix of urban and rural driving– High-density urban driving– Over 600 miles of rural roads– Many opportunities for driving in rural recreational areas– All within a relatively small geographic area

• Mix of weather and terrain• Availability of advanced technologies in vehicles• High-quality GIS data available• Access to Pacific Northwest Gigapop for high-speed

data transfer

Page 7: 1 John L. Campbell June 10, 2013 Managing a SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving Study in the Puget Sound Region Presentation at the 2013 ITE-WA Annual Meeting &

7

Seattle – Driver Characteristics

• High population density• Diverse culture with a wide range of incomes,

educational backgrounds, and ethnicities• Diversified economy employs a diverse workforce,

from skilled labor to professional level– Aerospace, business and finance, import/export, software,

Internet companies, biotechnology, biomedical research industries, etc.

• Pro-research attitude (ready recruitment)

Page 8: 1 John L. Campbell June 10, 2013 Managing a SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving Study in the Puget Sound Region Presentation at the 2013 ITE-WA Annual Meeting &

8

Key Tasks• Obtain Required Institutional Review Board (IRB) Approvals

• Prepare for Data Collection Procure and prepare instrumentation facility Train site staff

– Schedulers, Assessors, Installers

• Manage Participants Traditional and call center recruiting efforts Scheduling Intake (consent, personal assessments) On-going maintenance and any other issues

• Install DAS in Participant Vehicles

• Perform Crash Investigations

• Upload Driving Data and Monitor Data Quality

Page 9: 1 John L. Campbell June 10, 2013 Managing a SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving Study in the Puget Sound Region Presentation at the 2013 ITE-WA Annual Meeting &

9

The Battelle TeamTeam Member Key Role in S07

Battelle Institutional Review Board Considerations, Driver Recruitment, Driver Assessment, Facilities and Associated Equipment, Large Scale Study Management, Data Download and Management, Quality Control

TRAC-UW Assistance with Driver Assessment, Data Server and Data Uploads, Access to Federal, State, and Local Traffic Safety Data

Roush Industries Vehicle Instrumentation, System Maintenance Van

KLD Associates, Inc. Conduct Crash Investigations

Page 10: 1 John L. Campbell June 10, 2013 Managing a SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving Study in the Puget Sound Region Presentation at the 2013 ITE-WA Annual Meeting &

10

Recruitment Boundaries

Page 11: 1 John L. Campbell June 10, 2013 Managing a SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving Study in the Puget Sound Region Presentation at the 2013 ITE-WA Annual Meeting &

11

Participant Pipeline

Recruit Schedule Install

Page 12: 1 John L. Campbell June 10, 2013 Managing a SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving Study in the Puget Sound Region Presentation at the 2013 ITE-WA Annual Meeting &

12

BattelleGateway Corporate Center12822 Gateway DriveTukwila, WA 98168

Page 13: 1 John L. Campbell June 10, 2013 Managing a SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving Study in the Puget Sound Region Presentation at the 2013 ITE-WA Annual Meeting &

13

Intake and Installation Process

Page 14: 1 John L. Campbell June 10, 2013 Managing a SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving Study in the Puget Sound Region Presentation at the 2013 ITE-WA Annual Meeting &

14

Driver Data/Assessment• Demographics• Driving history• Driving knowledge• Driving behavior• Medical conditions• Sleep habits• Risk perception and risky behavior• Sensation seeking• Vision, strength, mobility

Page 15: 1 John L. Campbell June 10, 2013 Managing a SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving Study in the Puget Sound Region Presentation at the 2013 ITE-WA Annual Meeting &

15

Equipment Installed intoParticipant Vehicles

Head Unit

Front Turn Signals

Radar Unit

Radar Interface BoxDAS Main Unit

GPS Wi-Fi Antenna

Fuse Box

OBD Connector

Rear Looking Camera

Page 16: 1 John L. Campbell June 10, 2013 Managing a SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving Study in the Puget Sound Region Presentation at the 2013 ITE-WA Annual Meeting &

16

Page 17: 1 John L. Campbell June 10, 2013 Managing a SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving Study in the Puget Sound Region Presentation at the 2013 ITE-WA Annual Meeting &

17

• Head unit (as seen from passenger seat)

• DAS (mounted under passenger shelf)

• Front radar

Page 18: 1 John L. Campbell June 10, 2013 Managing a SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving Study in the Puget Sound Region Presentation at the 2013 ITE-WA Annual Meeting &

18

Participant Status (as of 5/31/13)12 month 24 month

Demographic Scheduled Completed Installed MCS Target Installed MCS TargetM: 16-17 0 5 30 11 4 4M: 18-20 0 8 12 19 12 7M: 21-25 0 2 34 19 14 7M: 26-35 0 19 2 19 7 7M: 36-50 0 21 1 19 6 7M: 51-65 0 21 0 19 7 7M: 66-75 0 19 3 19 7 7M: 76+ 0 4 34 19 21 7F: 16-17 1 3 29 11 9 4F: 18-20 0 9 21 19 17 7F: 21-25 0 4 47 19 12 7F: 26-35 0 18 2 19 7 7F: 36-50 0 20 1 19 7 7F: 51-65 0 23 2 19 6 7F: 66-75 0 14 4 19 8 7F: 76+ 0 6 29 19 18 7AVT 0 10 0   19  

Total 1 206 251 288 181 106

Totals:Installed: 432, Completed: 206

Page 19: 1 John L. Campbell June 10, 2013 Managing a SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving Study in the Puget Sound Region Presentation at the 2013 ITE-WA Annual Meeting &

19

Location of Participants

Page 20: 1 John L. Campbell June 10, 2013 Managing a SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving Study in the Puget Sound Region Presentation at the 2013 ITE-WA Annual Meeting &

20

Benefits of the Study• Improved understanding of baseline driving behaviors:

Trip characteristics Driver performance profiles Adherence to laws and basic safety practices

• Improved understanding of unsafe behaviors and traffic events: Assess circumstances and motivations for speeding, red light running, etc. Deconstruct crashes and near-misses and examine causality How do driver, vehicle, roadway, and environmental factors influence

behavior and impact crash risk?

• Improved ability to develop safety countermeasures for: Education and training Roadway design and traffic engineering Vehicle design Regulation and enforcement Ability to direct countermeasures at driver subgroups

Page 21: 1 John L. Campbell June 10, 2013 Managing a SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving Study in the Puget Sound Region Presentation at the 2013 ITE-WA Annual Meeting &

21

Question or Comments?

John L. Campbell, Ph.D.

Battelle, Center for Human Performance and Safety

206.528.3254

[email protected]