1. note that whites have a higher overall mortality rate

1
Example of distortion in aggregated versus disaggregated results. Annual death rates per 1,000 population, by age, Baltimore city, 1965. Race All ages Age < 1 yr 1-4 yrs 5-17 18-44 45-64 65+ White 14.3 23.9 0.7 0.4 2.5 15.2 69.3 Black 10.2 31.3 1.6 0.6 4.8 22.6 75.9 1. Note that whites have a higher overall mortality rate 3. The paradox arises because of the much higher mortality rates in the 65+ age-group, and because many fewer blacks reach this age, so contribute fewer cases overall. The All Ages data should have 2. Yet in each subgroup, whites have a lower mortality rate

Upload: reece-walker

Post on 02-Jan-2016

14 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Example of distortion in aggregated versus disaggregated results. Annual death rates per 1,000 population, by age, Baltimore city, 1965. 1. Note that whites have a higher overall mortality rate. 2. Yet in each subgroup, whites have a lower mortality rate. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1. Note that whites have  a higher overall  mortality rate

Example of distortion in aggregated versus disaggregated results.Annual death rates per 1,000 population, by age, Baltimore city, 1965.

RaceAll

agesAge < 1 yr

1-4 yrs 5-17 18-44 45-64 65+

White 14.3 23.9 0.7 0.4 2.5 15.2 69.3

Black 10.2 31.3 1.6 0.6 4.8 22.6 75.9

1. Note that whites have a higher overall

mortality rate

3. The paradox arises because of the much higher mortality rates in the 65+ age-group, and because many fewer blacks reach this age, so contribute fewer cases overall. The All Ages data should have been age-standardized.

2. Yet in each subgroup, whites

have a lower mortality rate