1 open forum for standards developers new york june 20-21, 2006 presented by mark palmer vice chair...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Open Forum for Standards DevelopersNew York
June 20-21, 2006 Presented byMark Palmer
Vice Chair of UN/CEFACT
International Cooperation on eBusiness Standards
(extract for UN/CEFACT Discussions – Sept. 2007)
Open Forum for Standards Developers June 20-21, 2006
Slide 2
Background
Many, overlapping eBusiness standards initiatives Too many standards and lack of commonality in use Industry and government expending critical resources
to monitor and influence multiple efforts Industry consortia agreed to work on improvements
— eBusiness Standards Convergence (eBSC) Forum— workshops and teams to address specific barriers
Common representation of coded lists Service Oriented Architectures Alternate Methods for Developing Message Building
Blocks and Management of Complexity
Open Forum for Standards Developers June 20-21, 2006
Slide 3
Forum
eBusiness Standards Convergence (eBSC) Forum (2004-2006)
Purpose: encourage coordination and convergence Neutral forum for industry, government and SDOs to:
— assess current state of delivery and use— define actions to improve this situation— optimize delivery and accelerate use
Deliver results to organizations developing or using eBusiness standards
— some results marginal impact: representation of code lists— others got traction: capabilities and standards registry
Success required commitment and ongoing advocacy
Open Forum for Standards Developers June 20-21, 2006
Slide 4
Barriers to Progress Lack of oversight and coordination among SDOs Ineffective harmonization / convergence processes Consolidated industry mandates, strategies, commitment
and leadership often missing Competition (real & perceived) between SDOs Perception that convergence erodes prominence Cost & time to modify / converge published specs Corporate decision makers apprehensive of further
investments in “infrastructure” standards or changes Minimal direct pressure on SDOs to converge
Open Forum for Standards Developers June 20-21, 2006
Slide 5
Observations and Challenges Camps of Interest / No Shared Roadmap
— SDOs with overlapping, parallel projects— addressing similar technical requirements and challenges
Need for a common, conceptual framework— provide a model for viewing the eBusiness space— understand requirements and available capabilities— identify overlaps, gaps and linkages— plan and coordinate projects and convergence— enable a registry of standards and SD projects.
who, what, how, when, status, access, input,…
Open Forum for Standards Developers June 20-21, 2006
Slide 6
eBusiness Capabilities, Standards and Standards Projects Matrix
Started with common concepts for first version Collected examples for testing and refinement Presented results to industry and SDOs
— May 2005 workshop at NIST, with ANSI – link to NSSN ISO IEC ITU UN/ECE MoU on eBusiness Standards
— agreement on need for de jure and consortia initiatives Aerospace Industry Association (AIA) – trial use
— March 2006 report: effective basis for industry planning Initiating work on prototype federated registry
Interest in Common Framework Industry Questionnaire - Q11. Is this model of eBusiness capabilities “stack”
useful and sufficient for providing a generic framework for describing what is needed? Summary of Responses: Yes, general support for the generic model; many organizations have ideas on modifications/additions.
Qu
ality
of S
erv
ices
Conceptual Model For B2BM
an
ag
em
en
t
S e
c u
r i t y
XML Syntax
Network
Transport
Vertical Industry Area
XML and Web Services Area
Generalized Processes
Specialized Processes
Generalized Content
Specialized Content
Messaging
Service Description Language
Presentation Description
Transaction Patterns
Transaction Instance
Repository
Registry / Directory
Process Description Language Content Definition Language
Co
nfo
rma
nc
e a
nd
Inte
rop
era
bility
Copyright © OASIS, 2003
Open Forum for Standards Developers June 20-21, 2006
Slide 8
Capabilities Framework: Purpose
Framework for standards developers to communicate effectively eBusiness-standards-related concepts among one another to promote more effective standards development, cross-industry standards collaboration and convergence, and standards adoption and deployment.
Framework for users of eBusiness standards to understand the available standards and relevant initiatives and to develop industry Roadmaps for the adoption and deployment of eBusiness standards.
Basis for federated repository of information on eBusiness standards initiatives with which standards implementers can approach planning,evaluation, selection, implementation and deployment.
Open Forum for Standards Developers June 20-21, 2006
Slide 9
Initial Capabilities Framework
Business Operational View Methodology and Overall Conceptual Models
Modeling methodology, patterns, process modeling Business Content for Business Messages
Content, assembly and identification Agreements
Business and technical contracts Functional Service View
Service description Syntax
Language, extensibility Application Transport and Network
Transport, messaging, quality of service Conformance and Interoperability
Test specifications, test suites, certification & accreditation processes
Open Forum for Standards Developers June 20-21, 2006
Slide 10
Capabilities Framework: Audience
eBusiness standards organizations and contributors Industry eBusiness standards initiatives and contributors eBusiness standards implementers Users of eBusiness standards
Capabilities Framework: Example Each functional area template includes:
— Functional category, definition, examples and placeholder for organization committee or working group
Standards Area
Definition Examples Org Comte/ Working Groups
Security This protective layer spans a wide range of abstractions from basic encryption, authentication and authorization on the core XML layer to non-repudiation and security policies in the business process layer.
SAML, WS-Security
OASIS, IETF
Open Forum for Standards Developers June 20-21, 2006
Slide 12
Capabilities Framework: Functional Areas
Methodologies Business Operational View Business Content for Business Messages Agreements Functional Service View Conformance and Interoperability Framework expanded with input from SDOs and
experts (refer to spreadsheet for details)
Open Forum for Standards Developers June 20-21, 2006
Slide 13
AIA Use of Capabilities Matrix for Adoption of eBusiness Standards
Business
requirements
Business
requirements BusinessSolutions
Scenarios
SolutionsSMC
Companies
EEIC
PSC
eBSG
EMC
AIA eBusiness
Implementation
Guidebook
FrameworkComponents
AIA eBusinessInteroperability
Framework
New
Interoperability
Requirements
TrackBoostAero
SAML
STEP
PLCS
GECA
XBRL
RFID
Monitorexternaldevelopment
Participate inexternaldevelopment
Adoptexisting standard
AIAdevelopment Candidate
UDEF
ClickableGTPA
PM/EVM
EEIC
EEIC
EEIC
EEIC
The eBSG approves candidate standards as part of the AIA framework
X12EDI
GTPATemplate
Adopted
SupplierUID
eBSG eBSG
eBSG eBSG
Open Forum for Standards Developers June 20-21, 2006
Slide 14
Model Representing Interoperable eBusiness Landscape of the Solution sets neededModel Representing Interoperable eBusiness Landscape of the Solution sets needed
Scenarios
Process models
Information content/componentsClassification schemesComponent libraries
Enterprise data and metadata
Reference dataIdentifiers
Process definition mechanisms Information definition mechanisms
Representation options
Transport options
Networks
Conform
ance and interoperability testing
Consraints
Contractual and regulatory
Security
Guidelines
Registry/R
epostory for Discovery, P
resence, Availability
Semantics - Terminology
353430
37
38
10
3
24
17
11
8
4 5
27
Service assem
bly
31
7
29
22
Physical representation 20
13 14 15
DataAssembly
16 19
23
Service definition mechanisms 1826
28
32
nn is row number in eBSC matrix
9
Open Forum for Standards Developers June 20-21, 2006
Slide 16
eBusiness Capabilities, Standards and Standards Projects Matrix
eBSC matrix is a tool for:— structuring / illuminating eBusiness standards space— convergence in delivering needed standards
— developing and executing coordinated strategies
Could be a catalyst and resource for SDOs strategic planning and industry roadmapping => eBGT
Prototyping starts in October 2007
— resources secured
— 4-5 SDOs participating
— first: collecting and posting; then “polling” and federated
Success will require commitment from participating SDOs