1 running head: del1 affects rice growth and leaf senescence 2 · 4/28/2017 · 97 accumulation of...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Running Head: DEL1 affects rice growth and leaf senescence 1
2
Corresponding authors: 3
Dali Zeng 4
State Key Lab for Rice Biology, China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou 5
310006, China 6
Tel: +86 571 6337 0537 7
Fax: +86 571 6337 0537 8
E-mail: [email protected] 9
10
Qian qian 11
State Key Lab for Rice Biology, China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou 12
310006, China 13
Tel: +86 571 6337 0537 14
Fax: +86 571 6337 0537 15
E-mail: [email protected] 16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Plant Physiology Preview. Published on April 28, 2017, as DOI:10.1104/pp.16.01625
Copyright 2017 by the American Society of Plant Biologists
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
2
Title of article: 31
A rice PECTATE LYASE-LIKE gene is required for plant growth and leaf senescence 32
Authors’names: 33
Yujia Leng1, 2, †, Yaolong Yang1, †, Deyong Ren1, †, Lichao Huang1, Liping Dai1, 2, 34
Yuqiong Wang1, Long Chen1, 2, Zhengjun Tu1, Yihong Gao1, Xueyong Li3, Li Zhu1, 35
Jiang Hu1, Guangheng Zhang1, Zhenyu Gao1, Longbiao Guo1, Zhaosheng Kong4, 36
Yongjun Lin2, Qian Qian1,*, Dali Zeng1,* 37
38
Addresses: 39 1 State Key Lab for Rice Biology, China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou 40
310006, China 41
2 National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement and National Centre of 42
Plant Gene Research, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China 43
3 National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Institute 44
of Crop Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, 45
China, 46
4 Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, State Key Laboratory of 47
Plant Genomics, Beijing 100101, China 48
ORCID IDs: 0000-0003-2349-8633 (D.Z.); 0000-0002-0349-4937 (Q.Q.). 49
One-sentence Summary: DEL1 affects rice growth and leaf senescence mediated 50
by PECTATE LYASE-LIKE genes. 51
52
Footnotes: 53
The author responsible for the distribution of materials integral to the findings 54
presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions 55
for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Dali Zeng ([email protected]), Qian Qian 56
([email protected]) 57
† contributed equally to the article. 58
Author Contributions: 59
Y.J.L., Y.L.Y., and D.Y.R. performed research. L.C.H., L.P.D., Y.Q.W., L.C., Z.J.T., 60
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
3
Y.H.G., L.Z., J.H., G.H.Z., Z.Y.G., L.B.G., Y.J.L., X.Y.L., and Z.S.K. analyzed the 61
data. Y.J.L. wrote the article. Y.J.L., D.L.Z. and Q.Q. designed the research. D.L.Z. 62
revised the article. 63
64
Funding Information: 65
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China 66
(Grant No. 31661143006, 91435105, 91535205), National Key Basic Research 67
Program (Grant No. 2013CBA014) and “Science and technology innovation project” 68
of the Chinese Academy of Agriculture Sciences. 69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
ABSTRACT 89
To better understand the molecular mechanisms behind plant growth and leaf 90
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
4
senescence in monocot plants, we identified a mutant exhibiting dwarfism and an 91
early-senescence leaf phenotype, termed dwarf and early-senescence leaf (del1). 92
Histological analysis showed that the abnormal growth was caused by a reduction in 93
cell number. Further investigation revealed that the decline in cell number in del1 94
was affected by the cell cycle. Physiological analysis, transmission electron 95
microscopy, and TUNEL assays showed that leaf senescence was triggered by the 96
accumulation of reactive oxygen species. The DEL1 gene was cloned using a 97
map-based approach. It was shown to encode a pectate lyase (PEL) precursor that 98
contains a PelC domain. DEL1 contains all the conserved residues of PEL and has 99
strong similarity with plant PelC. DEL1 is expressed in all tissues but predominantly 100
in elongating tissues. Functional analysis revealed that mutation of DEL1 decreased 101
the total PEL enzymatic activity, increased the degree of methylesterified 102
homogalacturonan and altered the cell wall composition and structure. In addition, 103
transcriptome assay revealed that a set of cell wall function and senescence related 104
gene expression was altered in del1 plants. Our research indicates that DEL1 is 105
involved in both the maintenance of normal cell division and the induction of leaf 106
senescence. These findings reveal a new molecular mechanism for plant growth and 107
leaf senescence mediated by PECTATE LYASE-LIKE (PLL) genes. 108
109
110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122
INTRODUCTION 123
The development of higher plants is accompanied by the complex processes of cell 124
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
5
division and cell expansion, and finally the emergence of many specialized organs, 125
tissues, and cells. As part of cell development in plants, cell walls perform essential 126
functions such as tensile strength, providing shape, and protection, as well as helping 127
the cell to maintain its internal pressure (Cosgrove, 2005). In growing plants, the cell 128
wall are both resistant to the high turgor pressure that drives growth and also flexible 129
enough to yield and expand selectively in response to that pressure (Cosgrove, 2005; 130
Xiao et al., 2014). This process involves a series of molecular mechanisms, 131
including disruption of the intermolecular adhesion, polymer lysis, religation and 132
rearrangements, and/or cleavage of polymer glycosyl linkages by enzymes 133
(McQueen-Mason and Cosgrove, 1995; Van Sandt et al., 2007; Anderson et al., 134
2010; Park and Cosgrove, 2012). 135
Pectins are major components of the plant primary cell wall and middle lamella 136
and have several functions, including involvement in maintaining plant growth and 137
development, promoting cell-to-cell adhesion, providing structural support in soft 138
tissues, defense responses, and influencing wall porosity and thickness, etc (Ridley 139
et al., 2001; Iwai et al., 2002; Ogawa et al., 2009; Wolf et al., 2009; Hongo et al., 140
2012). Pectins may be the most complex polysaccharide family in the living world, 141
being composed of as many as 17 different monosaccharides and having more than 142
20 different linkages (Bonnin et al., 2014). According to the current understanding 143
of pectins at the structure/function level, there are two conceptual models of 144
structural modification during plant growth (Atmodjo et al., 2013). First, the large 145
number of linkages and structural motifs allow the domains of pectins to interact 146
indirectly and/or via covalent bonds (Dick-Perez et al., 2011; Tan et al., 2013). 147
Second, pectins can depend on reversible calcium-mediated cross-linking between 148
stretches of demethylated homogalacturonan (HG) to coordinate cell wall networks 149
(Vincken et al., 2003; Xiao et al., 2014). Homogalacturonan is secreted in a highly 150
methylesterified form and selectively demethylesterified by pectin methylesterases 151
(PME) (Hongo et al., 2012). The demethylesterified HG can either form a rigid gel 152
by Ca2+-pectate cross-linked complexes, or become more susceptible to cleavage by 153
two classes of pectin-degrading enzyme, namely pectin/pectate lyase (PL/PEL, EC 154
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
6
4.2.2.10; EC 4.2.2.2) and polygalacturonase (PG, EC 3.2.1.15) (Wolf et al., 2009; 155
Hongo et al., 2012). Hence, the methylesterification status of HG can regulate 156
cellular growth and cell shape, and affect plant growth and development (Wolf et al., 157
2009; Peaucelle et al., 2011). 158
Pectate lyases, a family of endo-acting depolymerizing enzymes, are responsible 159
for the α-1,4-glycosidic linkages in demethylesterified HG by β-elimination and 160
produces 4,5-unsaturated oligogalacturonides (OGs) at their non-reducing ends 161
(Palusa et al., 2007). Pectate lyases have been extensively studied in plant 162
pathogenic bacteria such as Erwinia chrysanthemi, which causes soft-rot diseases 163
(Barras et al., 1994). In plants, multiple functions have been identified for PEL, and 164
there is some suggestion that it is involved in pollen, anthers, pistils, and developing 165
tracheary elements (Wing et al., 1989; Rogers et al., 1992; Wu et al., 1996; 166
Kulikauskas and McCormick, 1997; Domingo et al., 1998; Milioni et al., 2001), fruit 167
softening and ripening (Dominguez-Puigjaner et al., 1997; Medina-Escobar et al., 168
1997; Nunan et al., 2001; Pua et al., 2001), lateral root emergence (Laskowski et al., 169
2006), cotton fiber elongation (Wang et al., 2010), leaf senescence (Wu et al., 2013), 170
and susceptibility to plant pathogens (Vogel et al., 2002). It has also been shown to 171
be expressed in a wide range of tissues (Palusa et al., 2007; Sun and Nocker, 2010). 172
In addition, recent research has revealed that the overexpression of aspen PtxtPL1-27 173
can increase the solubility of wood matrix polysaccharides (Biswal et al., 2014). The 174
modification of pectins may be important in the field of biotechnology for improving 175
woody biomass (Biswal et al., 2014). 176
The large family of PECTATE LYASE-LIKE (PLL) genes all exhibit redundant or 177
unique functions in plant evolution, and this diversity may enhance plasticity in 178
adaptation to changing environments (Sun and Nocker, 2010). In rice, genome 179
prediction has suggested that there are 14 PLL genes, but only one of these (ospse1) 180
has been analyzed genetically (Wu et al., 2013). In this study, we report on the 181
isolation and characterization of a recessive mutant, dwarf and early-senescence leaf 182
1 (del1), in rice (Oryza sativa L.). The mutation of DEL1 led to a phenotype 183
involving abnormal plant growth and leaf senescence. DEL1 encodes a PEL 184
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
7
precursor and is a member of a multi-gene family in rice. The loss of function of 185
DEL1 decreased total PEL activity, increased the degree of methylesterified HG, and 186
perturbed cell wall composition and structure, resulting in a reduced number of cells 187
and triggering reactive oxygen species (ROS) activity. Expression profiling indicated 188
the genes involved in cell wall function and senescence are altered in expression in 189
the del1 plants. Our findings suggest that DEL1 is a critical gene for plant growth 190
and leaf senescence in rice. 191
192
RESULTS 193
del1 exhibits significant size reduction in the whole plant 194
The dwarf and early-senescence leaf 1 (del1) mutant was isolated from an 195
EMS-mutagenized japonica cultivar, Nipponbare. del1 exhibited dwarfism at the 196
seedling stage (5 days after germination) and its main root length was clearly 197
reduced, which reached 47.8% of that in the wild-type (Fig. 1a, c). Meanwhile, the 198
number of lateral roots in del1 decreased significantly to just 44.7% of that in the 199
wild-type (Fig. 1b, d). The plant height of del1 was also shorter than that of the 200
wild-type throughout the growth period, being only about 36.8% of that of the 201
wild-type at the mature stage (Fig. 1e, f; Fig. S1, S2), and the internode length, 202
thickness, and diameter of del1 were significantly reduced (Fig. S3). Compared with 203
the wild-type, the tiller number and panicle length were also clearly reduced in del1 204
plants (Fig. 1e, g, h, and k). Moreover, grain development also changed significantly, 205
with grain size and grain weight being diminished in del1 plants (Fig. 1i, j, l; Table 206
S1). Besides these phenotypic findings, the heading date of del1 was also notably 207
retarded, along with decreases in leaf length and leaf width (Table S1). These 208
phenotypes clearly suggest that plant size was significantly lower in del1 plants. 209
Cell number is reduced in del1 plants 210
The size of a plant organ is determined by its cell size and number of cells, which are 211
related to cell expansion and cell division, respectively (Krizek, 2009). To determine 212
the causes of organ size reduction in del1 plants, we conducted microscopic 213
observation on the second culms and compared the findings between the wild-type 214
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
8
and del1 using paraffinized sections. Cross sections of culms revealed that the size of 215
sclerenchyma cells in del1 was less than that in the wild-type (Fig. 2a–d). Statistical 216
analysis showed that the cell number of del1 was only 88.56% of that in the 217
wild-type (Fig. 2e). Moreover, the number of layers of sclerenchyma cells in del1 218
was reduced by two (Fig. 2c, d and f). Longitudinal sections of culms in del1 219
displayed a significant change in cell size (Fig. 2g, h). The cell length in del1 was 220
59.6% longer and the cell width was 20.8% narrower than that in the wild-type (Fig. 221
2i, j). Further investigation of the total number of parenchyma cells showed that del1 222
had only 19% of the number in the wild-type (Fig. 2k). 223
Cell cycle progression is delayed in del1 plants 224
To determine whether the decline in cell number in del1 was affected by the cell 225
cycle, we further investigated the cell cycle progression by flow cytometry. The 226
results of the suspension cell lines of del1 revealed a significant increase in the 227
number of cells in the G1 phase and decreases in the S and G2/M phases of the cell 228
cycle, implying that the cell cycle was delayed at the G1 phase (Fig. 3a–c). We also 229
analyzed the expression of cell-cycle-related genes in wild-type and del1 plants 230
using real-time RT-PCR. The expression levels of genes related to the G1 phase of 231
the cell cycle, CDKA1, CAK1, CAK1A, MCM5, and CYCT1, were down-regulated 232
by approximately 10–45%, while little difference was observed for genes related to 233
the G2 phase of the cell cycle in del1 mutants (Fig. 3d). Therefore, we conclude that 234
the mutation of DEL1 delays cell cycle progression at the G1 phase. 235
del1 displays early leaf senescence 236
del1 also exhibited a phenotype of early senescence, which became increasingly 237
apparent as the plants developed (Fig. 4a–d). The mutant leaf apex and leaf margin 238
exhibited a faint yellow color from 5 days after germination (Fig. 4a). With the 239
development of plants, the young leaves were pale white and then turned green upon 240
maturation, while the old leaves exhibited withering and cracking (Fig. 4b–d). The 241
chlorophyll content in del1 plants was significantly lower, being only 44.0% of that 242
in the wild-type (Fig. 4e). In addition, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) 243
revealed the presence of well-developed mesophyll cells and membrane-intact 244
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
9
chloroplasts in fully developed wild-type leaves, whereas the disordered 245
arrangement of grana thylakoid, and the degradation of chloroplasts, was observed in 246
del1 plants (Fig. 4f, g). Moreover, the photosynthetic rate in del1 plants was only 247
58.5% of that in the wild-type (Fig. 4h). All these results indicate that leaf 248
senescence occurred in del1 plants. 249
Leaf senescence is usually accompanied by a change of expression of many genes 250
including those for transcription factors (Wang et al., 2015). To confirm senescence 251
in the del1 plants, the expression levels of senescence-associated genes (SAGs) and 252
related transcription factors (Osl2, OsH36, SGR, OsNAC2, OsWRKY23, and 253
OsWRKY72) were determined by real-time RT-PCR. The expression levels of Osl2, 254
OsH36, SGR, OsNAC2, OsWRKY23, and OsWRKY72 mRNAs were 2.0 to 8.0 times 255
higher than in wild-type leaves (Fig. 4i). The up-regulated expression patterns of 256
SAGs and transcription factors further support the notion that early leaf senescence 257
occurred in del1 plants. 258
ROS accumulation and programmed cell death are enhanced in del1 plants 259
The accumulation of ROS can lead to leaf senescence (Khanna-Chopra, 2012). 260
Therefore, we performed nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) staining and 261
3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) staining tests to detect O2− and H2O2 accumulation, 262
respectively. Extensive NBT staining was observed in del1 plants, whereas the 263
staining was minimal in wild-type leaves (Fig. 5a). A brown color was seen for the 264
DAB staining, correlating with the area of leaf senescence, but there was no sign of 265
this in wild-type leaves (Fig. 5b). These results revealed that ROS accumulated in 266
del1 plants. During senescence, plant cell membrane damage can lead to a change in 267
electrolyte leakage (Blum and Ebercon, 1981). In del1 plants, the electrolyte leakage 268
was 45.8% higher than that in the wild-type (Fig. 5c), suggesting that del1 lost more 269
membrane integrity during development than the wild-type. 270
Plant senescence can lead to the synthesis of anti-oxidative enzymes to remove 271
ROS (Miller et al., 2010). Therefore, we quantitatively determined the activity of 272
these enzymes. The results indicated that the activities of superoxide dismutase 273
(SOD) and peroxidase (POD) increased in del1 plants, at 100.3 and 110.4 U/mg 274
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
10
fresh weight (FW) in del1 leaves, which were much higher than the levels of 62.2 275
and 102.3 U/mg FW in the wild-type leaves, respectively (Fig. 5d, e). In the process 276
of leaf senescence, ROS-scavenging systems may play an important role in ROS 277
detoxification (Tan et al., 2014). ROS-scavenging-related genes [alternative oxidases 278
(AOXs), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and catalase 279
(CAT)] were up-regulated during leaf senescence (Tan et al., 2014). As expected, the 280
expression levels of ROS-scavenging-related genes (AOX1a, AOX1b, APX1, APX2, 281
SODB, SODA1, catA, and catB) were 2.5 to 13.6 times higher than in the wild-type 282
(Fig. 5f). 283
Leaf senescence is the final stage of leaf development, and it is considered to be a 284
type of PCD (Nooden and Leopold, 1978). Trypan blue (TB) staining revealed that 285
the leaf apex and leaf margin of del1 were colored blue, but the counterpart 286
wild-type remained green (Fig. 5g), suggesting that some of the cells in the leaf apex 287
and leaf margin of the del1 plant were dead. One basic feature of PCD is the 288
condensation of nuclear chromatin, which is caused by endonucleolytic degradation 289
of nuclear DNA (Simeonova et al., 2000). We accordingly used the TUNEL assay to 290
determine whether the del1 plants induced PCD. A few of the nuclei in the wild-type 291
were TUNEL-positive; in contrast, most nuclei in the del1 leaf sections were 292
TUNEL-positive (Fig. 5h–k), indicating that DNA degradation was widespread in 293
the del1 leaves. 294
Map-based cloning of DEL1 295
To determine the molecular basis for the del1 phenotypes, a map-based cloning 296
approach was employed to isolate the corresponding gene. The mapping population 297
was generated by crossing DEL1 with Taichung Native 1, a wild-type indica variety 298
with DNA polymorphism with japonica. All the F1 plants exhibited a normal 299
phenotype matching that of the wild-type. In the F2 segregating populations, normal 300
and mutant phenotypes showed a typical segregation ratio of 3:1 (Table S2). This 301
finding suggests that del1 is controlled by a single recessive nuclear gene. 302
Thirty F2 plants with the del1 phenotype were used for primary mapping, and 303
DEL1 was found to be located on the long arm of chromosome 10 between markers 304
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
11
M1 and M14. Furthermore, by using 1081 homozygous mutant plants, DEL1 was 305
further narrowed down to an approximately 45-kb region with molecular markers as 306
shown in Supplemental Table 5. This 45-kb region is in the BAC AC025905 and 307
contains eight putative open-reading frames (ORFs), as annotated by the MSU Rice 308
Genome Annotation Project (Fig. 6a). Upon sequencing analysis of these eight ORFs, 309
one base-pair mutation was found at position 1940 of ORF LOC_Os10g31910. This 310
change from G to T causes a substitution at the 365th amino acid residue from 311
tryptophan (Trp) to leucine (Leu) (Fig. 6b). By examining this base in six other rice 312
varieties, we found that they all exhibited the wild-type genotype (Fig. S4). 313
To confirm that LOC_Os10g31910 is responsible for the del1 phenotype, a 314
7843-bp wild-type DEL1 DNA fragment, containing the promoter region and the 315
entire ORF, was introduced into del1 plants by Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated 316
transformation. Analysis of independent transgenic plants by PCR using primers 317
flanking the mutation site, together with further sequencing, revealed a double peak 318
(G and T) at the mutation site, confirming the presence of normal DEL1 gene 319
sequence (Fig. 6c). The transgenic plants rescued the phenotypes of del1, whereas in 320
all of those transformed by pCAMBIA1300, there was a failure to rescue the mutant 321
phenotype, confirming that disruption of the DEL1 gene was responsible for the del1 322
mutant phenotype (Fig. 6d–i). In addition, RNAi transgenic plants exhibited early 323
senescence leaves and a significantly reduced size (Fig. S5a–e). The expression of 324
DEL1 was significantly decreased in RNAi plants (Fig. S5f). Therefore, we conclude 325
that LOC_Os10g31910 is the DEL1 gene. 326
DEL1 encodes a pectate lyase precursor 327
Sequence analysis indicated that DEL1 cDNA is 1476 bp in length and encodes a 328
protein of 491 amino acid residues (Fig. 7a). A search using SignalP and Pfam 329
revealed that the DEL1 protein contains a 28-amino-acid signal peptide and one 330
predicted PelC domain (Fig. 7a). Multiple sequence alignment analysis revealed that 331
DEL1 contains all the conserved residues of PELs known to be involved in Ca2+ 332
binding, substrate binding, and catalysis, and has stronger similarity with plant PelC 333
than Erwinia chrysanthemi (Fig. S6). 334
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
12
An unrooted phylogenetic tree was built among PEL members of rice, Arabidopsis, 335
and seven known plant PELs using the neighbor-joining method, which revealed that 336
PEL were divided into five major clades, with clade I being further divided into four 337
sub-clades (Fig. 7b). DEL1 belongs to Ic and is in the same clade as PMR6 (a 338
powdery mildew susceptibility) of Arabidopsis (Vogel et al., 2002). 339
DEL1 was highly expressed in elongating tissues 340
To analyze the spatial and developmental expression of the DEL1 genes, we isolated 341
RNA from different tissues, including young roots, young sheaths, young leaves, 342
mature roots, mature sheaths, mature leaves, culms, panicles, and spikelets, and 343
determined the transcript levels of the DEL1 genes by real-time RT-PCR. The results 344
revealed that DEL1 was ubiquitously expressed in all the tissues examined at the 345
young and mature stages, and high levels of DEL1 expression were observed in 346
elongating tissues, such as culms and roots (Fig. 8a). 347
In addition, to analyze the spatial expression pattern of DEL1, we expressed the 348
β-glucuronidase (GUS) gene under the control of the native promoter of the DEL1 349
gene. Six independent DEL1:GUS transgenic lines were analyzed and all of them 350
exhibited similar results. The GUS activity was expressed in all of the tissues and 351
was consistent with the qRT-PCR data (Fig. 8b–j). 352
Mutation of DEL1 decreased total PEL activity and altered cell wall 353
composition and structure 354
Since PelC is the only domain identified in DEL1, it may be critical for its function. 355
Therefore, we determined the total PEL activity. As expected, PEL enzyme activity 356
was significantly decreased in del1 plants. Especially in culms, the PEL activity was 357
only 32.0% of that in the wild-type (Fig. 9a). This result is consistent with the real 358
time RT-PCR (Fig. 8a) and the ProDEL1:GUS expression results (Fig. 8b–j). 359
The morphological phenotypes suggested that the cell wall structure in the mutant 360
plants may also be altered. We therefore analyzed the structure of wild-type and del1 361
plants by TEM. The results revealed that the wall thicknesses of bundle sheath fiber 362
cells in del1 culms were altered (Fig. 9d-g). Specifically, the thicknesses of the 363
middle lamella and secondary cell wall were reduced by 51.6% and 40.6%, 364
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
13
respectively, and that of the primary cell wall was 15.6% higher than those of the 365
wild-type (Fig. 9h-j). Similarly in roots, the thicknesses (sclerenchyma cell) of the 366
middle lamella and secondary cell wall were reduced by 18.5% and 41.4%, 367
respectively, and that of the primary cell wall was 12.7% higher than those of the 368
wild-type (Fig. S7). 369
To determine whether changes in the cell wall structure affected the wall 370
composition, we analyzed the cellulose, hemicellulose, and pectin contents and 371
compared them between wild-type and del1 culms. The cellulose content of del1 was 372
reduced by approximately 20%, while the contents of hemicellulose 1 (HC 1), 373
hemicellulose 2 (HC 2), and pectin were increased by 58.3%, 27.3%, and 117.2%, 374
respectively (Fig. 9b). In addition, the levels of seven neutral monosaccharides were 375
also determined and compared between the wild-type and del1 plants. All the neutral 376
monosaccharides in del1 exhibited significant increases, except for xylose (Fig. 9c). 377
These results suggest that the DEL1 mutation causes complex compositional and 378
structural alterations in cell walls. 379
Mutation of DEL1 increased the degree of HG methylesterification 380
Given that PEL can catalyze the α-1,4 glycosidic linkages of demethylated HG by 381
β-elimination, we used immunohistochemical techniques to discern in situ aspects of 382
cell wall microstructures and locate polymers precisely. The second culms from 383
wild-type and del1 plants were probed using JIM5, LM18, and LM19 antibodies, 384
which are used to recognize partially demethylesterified and unesterified HG; JIM7 385
antibody, which labels moderately high extent of methylesterified HG; and 2F4 386
antibody, which binds to HG with degrees of methylesterification up to 40% 387
(Verhertbruggen et al., 2009; Held et al., 2011). As shown in Fig. 10, 388
immunolabeling of culm sections with JIM7, LM18, LM19, and 2F4 indicated an 389
apparent increase in the recognition of HG epitopes, while JIM5 exhibited a slight 390
increase, suggesting that the degree of methylesterified HG was higher in del1 391
plants. 392
Activation of cell wall and senescence related genes revealed by transcriptome 393
analysis 394
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
14
To further unravel the function of DEL1 in rice, 10-day-old wild-type and del1 plants 395
were used for transcriptome analysis. A total of 491 differentially expressed genes 396
(DEGs) were found, with a P-value <0.05 (Table S3). Among these genes, 332 were 397
up-regulated and 159 were down-regulated in del1 plants (Table S3). Clusters of 398
orthologous groups of proteins (COG) functional catalogue showed that in DEGs 399
were assigned to 39.2% and 50.9% of the up and down-regulated genes, respectively 400
(Table S3). Most of the genes up-regulated in del1 were involved in secondary 401
metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism, carbohydrate transport and 402
metabolism, lipid transport and metabolism (Table S3). The majority of the 403
down-regulated genes were associated with translation, ribosomal structure and 404
biogenesis, secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism and cell 405
wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis (Table S3). Of note, a set of the DEGs 406
associated with cell wall and senescence were significantly altered in del1 plants, 407
such as the pectin methylesterase gene (OsPME1), β-expansin gene (OsEXPB2), 408
peroxidase precursor gene (OsPOX1), protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase B gene 409
(OsPORA), etc (Kim et al., 2012; Sakuraba et al., 2013; Zou et al., 2015; Fang et al., 410
2016) (Table S4). These results suggested that the mutation of DEL1 might affect the 411
expression of cell wall and senescence related genes in an indirect manner. 412
413
DISSCUSSION 414
Pectate lyase is an endogenous pectin-degrading enzyme that is capable of cleaving 415
α-1,4-glycosidic linkages in demethylated pectin by β-elimination (Palusa et al., 416
2007). It is a ubiquitous enzyme in higher plants and is encoded by at least 26, 22, 417
and 14 genes in Arabidopsis, poplar (Populus trichocarpa), and rice (Oryza sativa 418
L.), respectively (Palusa et al., 2007). Although several PLL genes are considered to 419
play potentially diverse physiological roles in plants, such as being expressed in 420
anthers and pollen, and being involved in fruit softening and ripening, pathogen 421
defense, and tissue/plant growth and development, their molecular mechanism in 422
monocots remains largely unknown. Here, we identified DEL1 as a pectate lyase 423
precursor in model monocot rice using a forward genetic approach; it contains a 424
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
15
PelC domain and represents a multi-gene family in rice. DEL1 is crucial for plant 425
growth and leaf senescence. The loss of function of DEL1 reduced the total PEL 426
enzymatic activity, increased the degree of methylesterified HG, and perturbed the 427
cell wall structure and composition, resulting in retardation of the cell cycle and 428
enhancement of ROS activity. These results reveal a dual molecular function of PLL 429
genes in rice. 430
DEL1 impacts plant growth by regulating cell cycle progression 431
Cell division/expansion is a fundamental, dynamic cellular process driving plant 432
growth and development, and enables the plant and various organs to develop to 433
suitable sizes (Duan et al., 2012). The orderly development process involves many 434
genes and pathways that affect plant organ size by altering cell number, cell size, or 435
both (Krizek, 2009). Although recent studies have uncovered some key regulators 436
and genes that affect plant organ size, the intrinsic mechanisms responsible for organ 437
size variation are yet to be fully understood (Krizek, 2009; Duan et al., 2012). In this 438
study, we identified a PLL gene, DEL1, that appeared to play an important role in the 439
control of organ size in rice. In del1 plants, various organs were dramatically 440
reduced in size, including in terms of root length, leaf size, plant height, grain size, 441
and panicle and internode length (Fig. 1; Table 1). Inside the organs, paraffinized 442
sections of internodes revealed that cell number was lower in the del1 plants (Fig. 2), 443
suggesting that cell division is inhibited in the mutant. 444
Cell division requires a range of complicated processes that must be strictly 445
executed in a spatially and temporally controlled manner (Dewitte and Murray, 446
2003). The inhibition of cell division could alter cell cycle progression and affect 447
plant development (Dewitte and Murray, 2003). Our study demonstrates that the cell 448
cycle in the G1 phase was significantly retarded in del1 plants (Fig. 3a–c). Recent 449
evidence has indicated that a variety of cell cycle regulators play roles as targets 450
coupling cell proliferation with development, and their proper functioning is crucial 451
for patterning (Ramirez-Parra et al., 2005). Consistent with the flow cytometric 452
results, the expression levels of genes regulating the G1 phase of the cell cycle were 453
down-regulated in del1, and no significant difference was observed in the G2 phase 454
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
16
(Fig. 3d). These results strongly suggest that DEL1 controls plant growth by 455
regulating cell cycle progression. 456
DEL1 contributes to early leaf senescence through ROS accumulation 457
Leaf senescence is a complex process that involves many highly organized 458
molecular and cellular changes, such as the disintegration of chloroplasts; 459
down-regulation of photosynthesis; degradation of nucleic acids, proteins, and lipids; 460
and recycling of nutrients (Lim et al., 2007). This process is controlled by both 461
internal and external factors. To date, although many SAGs and/or transcription 462
factors have been identified, the complex mechanisms responsible for leaf 463
senescence in rice remain poorly understood. Recently, Wu et al. (2013) identified 464
the novel leaf senescence gene OsPSE1, which encodes a pectate lyase. Mutation of 465
OsPSE1 displays a premature senescence phenotype. In our study, we identified a 466
PLL gene, DEL1, which also appears to play a general role in leaf senescence. TEM 467
observation, physiological analysis, and TUNEL assays showed that leaf senescence 468
was induced in del1 plants, resulting in the withering and cracking of leaves (Fig. 4). 469
Moreover, the up-regulated expression levels of SAGs and transcription factors also 470
demonstrate leaf senescence in del1 plants (Fig. 4i). 471
Reactive oxygen species are by-products of various metabolic processes such as 472
photosynthesis and respiration in chloroplasts, mitochondria, and peroxisomes (Apel 473
and Hirt, 2004). They can cause oxidative damage to thylakoid membranes and other 474
cellular components, and assume several important roles in leaf senescence (Wang et 475
al., 2015). In the present study, staining by NBT and DAB indicated the 476
accumulation of O2− and H2O2 in del1 plants (Fig. 5a, b), and there was also an 477
elevated level of electrolyte leakage, which is a marker of cell membrane damage 478
(Fig. 5c). Meanwhile, the activities of SOD and POD were increased in del1 plants 479
(Fig. 5d, e). These results indicate that leaf senescence in del1 plants is triggered by 480
the accumulation of ROS. Under normal physiological conditions, cells control ROS 481
levels by balancing the generation of ROS with their elimination by the ROS 482
scavenging system, but the overproduction of ROS can trigger retrograde signaling 483
from chloroplasts to the nucleus, resulting in alteration of the expression of 484
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
17
nuclear-encoded genes (Tan et al., 2014). Consistent with this, the expression of 485
ROS-scavenging genes was significantly up-regulated (Fig. 5f). In addition, 486
transcriptome analysis also revealed that a set of the DEGs associated with 487
senescence was significantly altered in del1 plants (Table S4). 488
Taking these findings together, it is clear that ROS accumulation-mediated 489
chloroplast membrane breakage and chloroplast degradation play an important role 490
in leaf senescence in the del1 plants. 491
Possible molecular mechanism of DEL1 responsible for the mutant phenotypes 492
Pectate lyase-like genes have been shown to exhibit a broad range of functions in 493
plants, which depend on the degradation of demethylesterified HG and alteration of 494
cell wall composition and structure (Yadav et al., 2009; Biswal et al., 2014). In the 495
process of fruit ripening, the cell wall needs to loosen the xyloglucan-cellulose 496
network and pectin solubilization, this processes increasing the access of degradative 497
enzymes to their substrates (Brummell, 2006). For pathogen defense, the 498
accumulation of pectin increases hydrogen bonding in the extracellular matrix, 499
resulting in decreased nutrient availability to the pathogen (Vogel et al., 2002). The 500
decrease of de-esterified pectin in cotton fiber can promote its elongation (Wang et 501
al., 2010). Our study also demonstrates that the mutant phenotype of del1 depends 502
on the alteration of cell wall composition and structure. Despite our failure to purify 503
the fusion DEL1 protein via prokaryotic expression in E. coli or transient expression 504
in Nicotiana benthamiana (data not shown), the mutant phenotype indicated that 505
DEL1 protein plays an important role in rice growth and leaf senescence. 506
Many cell-wall-related mutants display abnormal growth and morphogenesis 507
(Pien et al., 2001). It has been speculated that cell wall biogenesis and modification 508
are tightly associated with cell growth via key genes at the interface of 509
morphogenesis, the cell cycle, and cell wall biogenesis (Somerville et al., 2004; 510
Zhang et al., 2010). In rice, the Brittle Culm 12 gene, encoding a kinesin-4 protein, 511
has been implicated in cell cycle progression, cellulose microfibril deposition, and 512
wall composition (Zhang et al., 2010). In our study, the del1 mutant exhibited cell 513
wall abnormalities and the retardation of cell cycle progression, which indicates that 514
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
18
DEL1 is at the interface between the cell cycle and cell wall biogenesis. 515
The dynamic interactions of plant cells depending on the status of pectin in the 516
cell wall form an important regulatory mechanism of growth and development (Wolf 517
et al., 2012). The degree of HG methylesterification has a large effect on the physical 518
properties of the cell wall (Held et al., 2011). A high degree of HG 519
methylesterification impedes the formation of calcium-mediated cross-linking 520
complexes, which is thought to promote cellular expansion by increasing wall 521
flexibility (Wolf et al., 2009). Our findings revealed that the degree of 522
methylesterified HG was increased, as determined by immunohistochemical assay, 523
which indicates that the cell wall loosened and expanded in the del1 plants (Fig. 10). 524
Consistent with this, the cell length was significantly increased and the expression 525
levels of expansion were all dramatically up-regulated in the del1 plants (Fig. 2g, h. 526
Fig. S8). These results indicate that the function of DEL1 affects not only cell 527
number, but also cell expansion. 528
In addition, our findings also revealed an early leaf senescence phenotype in 529
comparison to that in wild-type plants. This initially appears paradoxical, but it could 530
potentially be explained by the alterations of cell wall structure. Pectin OGs are 531
oligomers of α-1,4-linked galacturonosyl residues and are released by PEL and 532
PG-mediated breakdown of HG (Cote et al., 1998). Oligogalacturonides can produce 533
ROS signal molecules and trigger many abiotic stress responses in plants (Ferrari et 534
al., 2013). In our study, mutation in DEL1 significantly increased ROS content. We 535
speculate that DEL1 may participate in the OG-mediated ROS pathway that affects 536
leaf senescence. 537
We hypothesize a conceptual model that by tuning HG methylesterification, cell 538
wall component and structure might act as downstream components of the regulatory 539
networks that control cell cycle and expansion, as well as ROS, enabling normal 540
growth and leaf senescence in rice (Fig. 11). 541
542
MATERIALS AND METHODS 543
Plant materials 544
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
19
The rice del1 mutant was isolated from ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS)-treated 545
japonica cultivar Nipponbare, as described previously (Guo et al., 2006). An F2 546
mapping population was generated from a cross between del1 and an indica cultivar, 547
Taichung Native 1 (TN1). All plants were cultivated in paddies in Hangzhou (HZ, 548
119°54′ E, 30°04′ N) and Hainan (HN, 110°00′ E, 18°31′ N), during rice-growing 549
seasons. 550
Paraffin sectioning and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis 551
For paraffin sectioning, the samples were fixed in 50% ethanol, 0.9 M glacial acetic 552
acid, and 3.7 % formaldehyde overnight at 4°C, then dehydrated with a graded series 553
of ethanol, infiltrated with xylene, and embedded in paraffin (Sigma). The specimens 554
were sectioned (8 μm thickness) with a Leica RM2245, transferred onto glass slides 555
with poly-L-lysine-coated, deparaffinized with xylene series, and dehydrated 556
through an ethanol series (Ren et al., 2016). The samples section was conducted 557
using a Nikon Eclipse 90i microscope. 558
For TEM, the samples were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in phosphate-buffered 559
saline (PBS) for at least 4 h and washed in PBS three times. Then, they were 560
post-fixed with 1% (w/v) OsO4 for 2 h after extensive washing in PBS, dehydrated 561
with a graded ethanol series, and infiltrated with Suprr Kit (Sigma). The specimens 562
were then sectioned (70 nm ultra-thin) with a Leica EM UC7 ultratome and the 563
sections was stained by uranyl acetate and alkaline lead citrate for 10 min before 564
being observed by TEM with a Hitachi Model H-7650. 565
Flow cytometric analysis 566
Cell cycle analysis was performed in accordance with the method described by 567
Galbraith et al. (1983). In brief, suspension cells were cut using a razor blade and 568
placed in ice-cold Galbraith’s buffer (45 mM MgCl2, 30 mM sodium citrate, 20 mM 569
MOPS, 0.1% TritonX-100, pH 7.0). The homogenates were then passed through a 570
20-µm mesh to remove cellular debris. After staining with 571
4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, 2 µg ml−1), the nuclei were analyzed using 572
FACSAria II flow cytometer (BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA, USA). A total of 30,000 573
events were recorded, and three independent flow cytometric experiments were 574
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
20
carried out and analyzed using the ModFit LT (Verity Software House, Inc., Maine, 575
CA) and FlowJo V10 software (Tree Star Inc., Ashland, OR). 576
Chlorophyll content and net photosynthesis rate 577
A total 0.2 g of samples from wild-type and del1 leaves were extracted with 80% 578
acetone. The chlorophyll content was determined according to the method as 579
previously described (Yang et al., 2015). Net photosynthesis rate was measured 580
using Walz GFS-3000 (Eichenring, Germany). Parameter settings were accordance 581
with the manufacturer’s instructions. 582
Histochemical staining and ROS-scavenging enzyme assays 583
DAB and NBT staining was used to detect the accumulation of ROS, as previously 584
described (Blum and Ebercon, 1981). TB staining was performed as described 585
previously (Koch and Slusarenko, 1990). Electrolyte leakage was determined in 586
accordance with a previous study (Zhou and Guo, 2009). Assays of the activities of 587
SOD and POD were conducted in accordance with previously described methods 588
(Wang et al., 2013). 589
TUNEL assays 590
The TUNEL assays were performed as described previously (Huang et al., 2007). 591
The leaves were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M PBS containing 0.1% 592
Tween 20 and Triton X-100 at 4°C overnight and embedded in paraplasts. The 593
sections of leaves (8 μm thickness) were treated using a Fluorescein In Situ Cell 594
Death Detection Kit (Roche, Switzerland). The green fluorescence of fluorescein and 595
blue fluorescence of DAPI was analyzed using a Carl Zeiss LSM 710 laser-scanning 596
confocal microscope (Gottingen, Germany). 597
Gene cloning and complementation 598
For genetic analysis, 1081 F2 mutant plants were used for fine mapping of the DEL1 599
locus. The molecular markers of polymorphism are listed in Table S5. The markers 600
were designed using Primer 5 software (Primer-E Ltd). Gene prediction and 601
sequence analysis were performed using the publicly available rice databases, 602
including Gramene (http://www.gramene.org) and the Rice Genome Annotation 603
Project (http://rice.plantbiology.msu.edu/index.shtml). For the complementation 604
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
21
construct, a 7843-bp genomic DNA fragment containing the entire DEL1 coding 605
region, a 1998-bp upstream sequence, and an 841-bp downstream region was 606
amplified using KOD FX (Toyobo, Japan) from Nipponbare genomic DNA and 607
inserted into the binary vector pCAMBIA 1300. The recombinant binary vector was 608
introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105 by electroporation and 609
transformed into the del1 mutant callus as described previously (Hiei et al., 1994). 610
For the RNAi construct, a 336-bp fragment was amplified by PCR from Nipponbare 611
cDNA and inserted into the vector pTCK303. The recombinant binary vector was 612
transformed into the Nipponbare callus. The primer sequences used in this study are 613
listed in Table S5. 614
Phylogenetic analysis and protein domain identification 615
Annotated proteins of DEL1 domains were identified in the Pfam database 616
(http://pfam.xfam.org/). The signal peptide was predicted using SignalP version 4.1 617
(Petersen et al., 2011). Homologous protein sequences of DEL1 were identified 618
using the NCBI BLAST server (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). Amino acid 619
sequence alignments were conducted using ClustalX 2.1 (http://www.clustal.org/) 620
and DNAMAN version 5.0 (Lynnon Biosoft, San Ramon, CA, USA). A phylogenetic 621
tree was constructed using MEGA4 software (http://www.megasoftware.net/). 622
Gene expression analysis 623
Total RNA from roots, culms, sheaths, leaves and panicles at young and mature 624
stages, was extracted using the RNeasy plant mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). 625
RNA reverse transcription was performed using ReverTra Ace real time PCR-RT Kit 626
with gDNA remover (Toyobo, Japan). After synthesis, the cDNA reaction was 627
diluted five times in TE buffer, and 1 μl was used for real time RT-PCR using the 628
SYBR Green PCR Master Mix kit (Applied Biosystems, Wellesley, MA, USA) and 629
gene-specific primers (Table S5) in ABI7900 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, 630
USA). The tissue-level expression pattern of DEL1 was analyzed using the 631
β-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter gene. The promoter of DEL1 (2038 bp upstream of 632
ATG) was amplified from the genome DNA of Nipponbare and inserted into the 633
binary vector pCAMBIA1305 in-frame with the GUS reporter gene. The binary 634
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
22
vector was introduced into the Nipponbare callus to generate transgenic plants. The 635
positive transgenic plants were used to analyze the GUS reporter gene. Different 636
tissues of T1 plants were incubated at 37°C in 0.1 M X-Gluc in buffer [0.1 M 637
Na2HPO4-NaH2P4, pH 7.0, 10% Triton X-100, 0.5 M EDTA-Na, and 50 mM 638
K3Fe(CN)6] for approximately 12 h to examine GUS activity. After being cleaning in 639
70% ethanol, the tissues were photographed under a light microscope. 640
Enzyme activity assays 641
Pectate lyase enzyme activity assays were routinely performed using a modified 642
version of the method of Collmer et al. (1988). A total of 0.5 g of sample was 643
suspended in 1.5 ml of extraction buffer (20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.0, 20 mM 644
cysteine/HCl, 1% polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), mw 360,000 and 1 mM 645
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) and centrifuged at 10,000g for 30 min. The 646
supernatant was collected as the crude extract for enzyme assays. 647
The enzyme activity system consisted of 0.3% polygalacturonic acid (PGA) in 0.07 648
M Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0), 0.1 M CaCl2, crude extract protein, and sterile water. 649
The enzyme reaction was incubated at 37°C for 30 min, and then stopped by the 650
addition of 9% ZnSO4•7H2O and 0.5 M NaOH. The control tubes received the 651
enzyme after the addition of ZnSO4•7H2O and NaOH. One unit of PEL activity was 652
defined as the amount of enzyme that produces 1 mM of 4,5-unsaturated product in 1 653
min under the assay conditions. The activity of PEL is expressed in units per mg of 654
protein. Soluble protein concentrations were determined in accordance with 655
Bradford method (1976), using bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a standard. 656
Immunofluorescence microscopy 657
The culms of wild-type and del1 plant at the same development stage were fixed and 658
embedded in glycol methacrylate. Two-micrometer-thick sections were cut with a 659
Leica RM2265. Immunolabeling was performed in accordance with the 660
methodology of Willats et al., (2001). The primary antibodies JIM5, JIM7, LM18, 661
LM19, and 2F4 were used at a 1:10 dilution in PBS containing 5% (w/v) fat-free 662
milk powder (5% M/PBS) and the secondary antibody (goat anti-rat IgG coupled 663
with fluorescein isothiocyanate, FITC) were used at dilution of 100-fold in 5% 664
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
23
M/PBS. Sections incubated without primary antibody were used as controls to assess 665
the autofluorescence of the samples. The labeled sections were observed using Carl 666
Zeiss LSM 710 confocal microscope. 667
Compositional analysis of neutral glycosyl residues and cellulose content 668
Alcohol-insoluble residues (AIRs) of culms were prepared as described by Zhang et 669
al., (2012). In briefly, de-starched AIRs samples were hydrolyzed in 2 M 670
trifluoroacetic acid at 121°C for 90 min. The samples were centrifuged to collect the 671
supernatants, air-dried and then dissolved with a 1 M ammonium hydroxide buffer 672
containing NaBH4. The alditol acetate derivatives were analyzed using an Agilent 673
7890 GC system equipped with a 5975C MSD (GC-MS) (Song et al., 2013). To 674
measure the crystalline cellulose content, the pellets remaining after trifluoroacetic 675
acid treatment were hydrolyzed with Updegraff reagent (Updegraff, 1969). The 676
samples were subsequently centrifuged and the supernatant removed. The pellets 677
were then treated with 72% sulfuric acid. The cellulose content was quantified via an 678
anthrone assay, and three replicates were included. 679
Cell wall extraction and measurement of polysaccharide content 680
Cell wall materials and fractionation components were analyzed in accordance with 681
the methods of Zhong and Lauchli (1993). The samples were ground in liquid 682
nitrogen to a fine power and suspended in 75% ethanol for 25 min in an ice-cold 683
water bath. The samples were then centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 15 min and 684
removed the supernatant. Next, the pellet was suspended and washed with precooled 685
acetone, followed by methanol:chloroform, and then with methanol. The remaining 686
pellet as a crude cell wall fraction was freeze-dried and stored at 4°C for future use. 687
The cell wall extracts were fractionated into three parts: pectin, HC 1 and HC 2. First, 688
the pectin fraction was extracted twice using 0.5% ammonium oxalate buffer 689
containing 0.1% NaBH4 (pH 4) in a boiling water bath for 1 h. Next, the pellets were 690
subjected to triple extractions with 4% KOH containing 0.1% NaBH4 at room 691
temperature for 8 h each, followed by a similar extraction with 24% KOH containing 692
0.1% NaBH4. The HC 1 and HC 2 fractions were referred to as hemicellulose 693
material (Yang et al., 2008). The uronic acid content in the pectin fraction was 694
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
24
assayed in accordance with the method of Blumenkrantz and Asboe-Hansen (1973) 695
using galacturonic acid (GalA) as a standard. 696
Transcriptome sequencing and data analysis 697
The RNA samples from 10-day-old wild-type and del1 plants were used for 698
transcriptome sequencing, and each sample was pooled for total RNA isolation with 699
three biological replicates. Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol® reagent 700
(Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Transcriptome sequencing was 701
performed in Biomarker Biotechnology Corporation (Beijing, China) using the 702
Illumina system HiSeq2500 (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) according to the 703
standard procedure. Transcriptome assembly was performed according to the 704
protocol described previously (Yu et al., 2013). Differentially expressed genes were 705
defined by using IDEG6 (Romualdi et al., 2003), at a significance level of P<0.05. 706
Functional annotation analysis of DEGs in wild-type and del1 plants was performed 707
by DAVID Web tools (Huang et al., 2008). 708
709
Accession Numbers 710
Sequence data from this article can be found in the EMBL/GenBank data libraries 711
under the following accession numbers: DEL1 (LOC_Os10g31910), PMR6 712
(At3g54920), NJJS25 (AF339024), PtxtPL1-27 (EU379971), ZePel (Y09541), 713
MaPel (AAF19195), GhPel (ADB90478), CryjⅠ(BAA05542), SGR 714
(LOC_Os09g36200), OsNAC2 (LOC_Os01g66120), Osl2 (LOC_Os04g52450), 715
OsH36 (LOC_Os05g39770), OsWRKY23 (LOC_Os01g53260), OsWRKY72 716
(LOC_Os11g29870), CDKA1 (LOC_Os03g02680), CAK1 (LOC_Os06g07480), 717
CAK1A (LOC_Os06g22820), CMC5 (LOC_Os02g55410), CYCT1 718
(LOC_Os02g24190), CYCA2.2 (LOC_Os12g31810), CYCA2.3 (LOC_Os01g13260), 719
CYCB2.2 (LOC_Os06g51110), AOX1a (LOC_Os04g51150), AOX1b 720
(LOC_Os04g51160), APX1 (LOC_Os03g17690), APX2 (LOC_Os07g49400), SODB 721
(LOC_Os06g05110), SODA1 (LOC_Os05g25850), catA (LOC_Os02g02400), catB 722
(LOC_Os06g51150), OsEXPA1 (LOC_Os04g15840), OsEXPA2 723
(LOC_Os01g60770), OsEXPA5 (LOC_Os02g51040), OsEXPA10 724
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
25
(LOC_Os04g49410), OsEXPA32 (LOC_Os08g44790), OsEXPB3 725
(LOC_Os10g40720), OsEXPB5 (LOC_Os04g46650), OsEXPB9 (LOC_Os10g40090) 726
and OsEXPB11 (LOC_Os02g44108). 727
728
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 729
We are grateful to Dr. Yihua Zhou (Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, 730
Chinese Academy of Sciences) for help with the monosaccharide and cellulose 731
analyses; Dr. Yong Hu (Capital Normal University) for help with the flow cytometric 732
analysis; and Dr. Paul Knox (Centre for Plant Science, University of Leeds, UK) for 733
kindly providing the protocol for the immunofluorescence assay. 734
735
Figure legends 736
Figure 1. Comparison of phenotype between wild-type and del1 plants 737
(a) Wild-type (Nipponbare, left) and del1 plants (right) 5 days after sowing. Scale 738
bar = 2 cm. (b) Root length of wild-type (left) and del1 plants (right) 5 days after 739
sowing. Scale bar = 1 cm. (c and d) Statistical analysis of root length and lateral root 740
number between wild-type and del1 plants. Twenty plants were measured. Error bars 741
indicate SD, ** indicates P<0.01 (Student’s t-test). (e) Wild-type (left) and del1 plants 742
(right) at maturity. Scale bar = 10 cm. (f and g) Statistical analysis of plant height 743
and tiller number between wild-type and del1 plants. Twenty plants were measured. 744
Error bars indicate SD, ** indicates P<0.01 (Student’s t-test). (h) Phenotype of 745
panicle between wild-type (left) and del1 (right) plants. Scale bar = 5 cm. (i) Floret 746
with the lemma removed, wild-type (left) and del1 (right). Scale bar = 0.5 cm. (j) 747
Mature seed and brown rice of wild-type (left) and del1 (right). Scale bar = 0.5 cm. 748
(k) and (l) Statistical analysis of panicle length and thousand grain weight between 749
wild-type and del1 plants. Twenty panicles were measured. Error bars indicate SD, ** 750
indicates P<0.01 (Student’s t-test). 751
752
Figure 2. Histological characterization of culms in wild-type and del1 plants 753
(a–d) Cross sections of internode II of wild-type (a) and del1 (b). Scale bar = 500 μm. 754
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
26
(c) Magnification of (a), (d) magnification of (b); white rectangle shows a 755
magnification of the sclerenchyma cell layer. Scale bar = 50 μm. (e and f) Statistical 756
analysis of cell number and sclerenchyma cell layer number between wild-type and 757
del1 plants, means ± SD of five independent replicates. (g and h) Longitudinal 758
sections of internode II of wild-type (g) and del1 (h). Scale bar = 50 μm. (i and j) 759
Statistical analysis of the cell length and cell width between wild-type and del1 760
plants, mean ± SD of 30 cells. ** indicates P<0.01 (Student’s t-test). (k) Number of 761
parenchyma cells (PCs) for internode II of wild-type and del1 plants, means ± SD of 762
five independent replicates. 763
764
Figure 3. Cell cycle analysis of wild-type and del1 plants 765
(a and b) Flow karyotype histogram of wild-type (a) and del1 (b) leaves. (c) 766
Quantification of the DNA profiles of wild-type and del1 plants. (d) Relative 767
expression levels of cell-cycle-related genes in wild-type and del1 plants, means ± 768
SD of three independent replicates. * indicates P<0.05, ** indicates P<0.01 (Student’s 769
t-test). 770
771
Figure 4. Leaf phenotype and identification of leaf senescence in DEL1 772
(a–d) Leaf phenotype from young (a), tillering (b, c), and heading (d) stages. Scale 773
bars = 1 cm, 5 cm, 5 cm and 1 cm, respectively. (e) Statistical analysis of chlorophyll 774
content between wild-type and del1 plants, means ± SD of five independent 775
replicates. ** indicates P<0.01 (Student’s t-test). (f and g) Transmission electron 776
microscopy analysis of senescence leaves of wild-type (f) and del1 plants (g). Scale 777
bar = 0.5 μm. (h) Statistical analysis of photosynthesis rate between wild-type and 778
del1 plants, means ± SD of five independent replicates. ** indicates P<0.01 779
(Student’s t-test). (i) Relative expression levels of senescence-related genes and 780
transcription factors in wild-type and del1 plants, means ± SD of three independent 781
replicates. * indicates P<0.05, ** indicates P<0.01 (Student’s t-test). 782
Figure 5. ROS accumulation and enhancement of PCD in wild-type and del1 783
leaves 784
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
27
(a and b) NBT and DAB staining of leaves between the wild-type (left) and del1 785
plants (right). (c–e) Statistical analysis of electrolyte leakage (c), SOD activity (d), 786
and POD activity (e) in leaves between wild-type and del1 plants, means ± SD of 787
five independent replicates. ** indicates P<0.01 (Student’s t-test). (f) Relative 788
expression levels of ROS detoxification-related genes in wild-type and del1 plants, 789
means ± SD of three independent replicates. ** indicates P<0.01 (Student’s t-test). (g) 790
Trypan blue staining of leaves in wild-type (left) and del1 plants (right). (h–k) 791
TUNEL assay of leaves. DAPI staining of wild-type (h) and del1 plants (j). Positive 792
results of wild-type (i) and del1 plants (k), scale bar = 50 μm. 793
794
Figure 6. Map-based cloning and identification of DEL1 795
(a) Fine mapping of DEL1. The del1 locus was mapped to a 45-kb region on 796
chromosome 10. (b) Schematic diagram of DEL1. Black rectangles represent exons. 797
Black inverted triangle represents mutant site. (c) Sequencing analysis of the DEL1 798
transcripts in T0 transgenic lines. (d and e) Phenotype of the complementation 799
transgenic line: wild-type (left), complementation transgenic line (middle) and 800
empty vector control (right). Scale bars = 10 cm and 4 cm, respectively. (f) 801
Expression levels of DEL1 detected by qRT-PCR in wild-type and transgenic plants, 802
means ± SD of three independent replicates. (g–i) Statistical analysis of plant height 803
(g), tiller number (h), and flag leaf length (i) in wild-type and transgenic plants, 804
means ± SD of ten independent replicates. 805
806
Figure 7. Prediction of the primary sequence and phylogenetic analysis of DEL1 807
(a) The deduced amino acid sequence of DEL1. Numbers on the left refer to the 808
positions of amino acid residues. The signal peptide is indicated with an underline; 809
the PelC domain is shown by a dotted line; the conserved residues involved in Ca2+ 810
binding (red background), disulfide bonds (orange background), catalysis (blue 811
background), and substrate binding (purple background) (b) Phylogenetic tree of 812
PEL in Arabidopsis thaliana, Oryza sativa L., and other plants. The numbers at each 813
node represent the bootstrap support (percentage), and scale bar is an indicator of 814
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
28
genetic distance based on branch length. 815
816
Figure 8. Expression analysis of DEL1 817
(a) Transcription level of DEL1 in various organs, means ± SD of three independent 818
replicates. YR, young root; YL, young leaf; YS, young sheath; MR, mature root; C, 819
culm; ML, mature leaf; MS, mature sheath; P, panicle; S, spikelet. (b–j) GUS 820
analysis of DEL1 expression: (b and c) Four and seven days after germination of 821
the young plant, scale bar = 1 cm; (d) root, scale bar = 500 μm; (e) lateral root, scale 822
bar = 250 μm; (f) mature sheath, scale bar = 1 cm; (g) mature leaf, scale bar = 1 cm; 823
(h) culm, scale bar = 1 cm; (i) spikelet, scale bar = 1 cm; (j) lemma and palea were 824
removed in (i), scale bar = 500 μm. 825
826
Figure 9. The levels of PEL activity and cell wall composition and structure in 827
wild-type and del1 plants 828
(a) Analysis of PEL activity in wild-type and del1 plants, means ± SD of five 829
independent replicates. ** indicates P<0.01 (Student’s t-test). (b) Comparison of cell 830
wall composition between wild-type and del1 plants, means ± SD of five 831
independent replicates. **indicates P<0.01 (Student’s t-test). HC 1: hemicellulose 1, 832
HC 2: hemicellulose 2. (c) Neutral monosaccharide composition between wild-type 833
and del1 plants, means ± SE of five independent replicates, ** indicates P<0.01 834
(Student’s t-test). (d and e) Transmission electron microscopy micrographs of the 835
bundle sheath fiber cells of wild-type (d) and del1 (e) plants, scale bar = 1 μm. (f) 836
Magnification in (d), and (g) magnification in (e), scale bar = 0.2 μm. ml: middle 837
lamella, pw: primary cell wall, sw: secondary cell wall, pm: plasma membrane, c: 838
cytoplasm. (h–j) Statistical analysis of the middle lamella (h) , primary cell wall (i), 839
and secondary cell wall (j) thicknesses of bundle sheath fiber cells between the 840
wild-type and del1 plants, mean ± SD of 30 cells, ** indicates P<0.01 (Student’s 841
t-test). 842
843
Figure 10. Immunohistochemical localization of HG in culm sections of 844
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
29
wild-type and del1 plants 845
(a–t) Immunolocalization of HG of wild-type (a, c) and del1 plants (b, d) with JIM7, 846
wild-type (e, g) and del1 plants (f, h) with JIM5, wild-type (i, k) and del1 plants (j, l) 847
with LM18, wild-type (m, o) and del1 plants (n, p) with LM19, wild-type (q, s) and 848
del1 plants (r, t) with 2F4. Scale bar = 50 μm. 849
850
Figure 11. A schematic model of DEL1 function in rice 851
Homogalacturonan is secreted in a highly methylesterified form and selectively 852
demethylesterified by PME. The demethylesterified HG might be cleaved by DEL1 853
and other PELs or PGs. The alternative of the cell wall regulated the cell cycle/ 854
expansion and ROS, enabling normal rice growth and leaf senescence process. 855
856
Supplemental Data 857
Supplemental Figure 1. Wild-type (Nipponbare, left) and del1 plants (right) at the 858
tillering stage. 859
Supplemental Figure 2. Statistical analysis of plant height from 30 to 110 days 860
between wild-type and del1 plants. 861
Supplemental Figure 3. Internode assessment of culms in the wild-type and del1 862
plants. 863
Supplemental Figure 4. Mutation position of wild-type, del1 and six other varieties. 864
Supplemental Figure 5. The phenotype of wild-type and RNAi transgenic plants. 865
Supplemental Figure 6. Protein sequence alignment of DEL1 and homologs. 866
Supplemental Figure 7. Cell wall structure in wild-type and del1 roots 867
Supplemental Figure 8. Expression analysis of cell expansion-related genes in 868
culms. 869
Supplemental Table 1. The basic agronomic traits in wild-type and del1 plants. 870
Supplemental Table 2. Segregation analysis of F2 phenotype from crosses of del1 871
and five crop strains (NPB, TN1, ZF802, NJ06, and 93-11). 872
Supplemental Table 3. Clusters of orthologous groups of proteins (COG) functional 873
catalogue of differentially expressed genes in del1 plants 874
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
30
Supplemental Table 4. Differentially expressed of cell wall and senescence related 875
genes in del1 plants. 876
Supplemental Table 5. Primers used for PCR in this study. 877
878
LITERATURE CITED 879
Anderson CT, Carroll A, Akhmetova L, Somerville C (2010) Real-time imaging of cellulose 880 reorientation during cell wall expansion in Arabidopsis roots. Plant Physiol 152: 881 787-796 882
Apel K, Hirt H (2004) Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal 883 transduction. Annu Rev Plant Biol 55: 728-749 884
Atmodjo MA, Hao Z, Mohnen D (2013) Evolving views of pectin biosynthesis. Annu Rev 885 Plant Biol 64: 747-779 886
Barras F, Gijsegem FV, Chatterjee AK (1994) Extracellular enzymes and pathogenesis of 887 soft-rot Erwinia. Annu Rev Phytopathol 32: 201-234 888
Biswal AK, Soeno K, Gandla ML, Immerzeel P, Pattathil S, Lucenius J, Serimaa R, Hahn 889 MG, Moritz T, Jonsson LJ, et al (2014) Aspen pectate lyase PtxtPL1-27 mobilizes 890 matrix polysaccharides from woody tissues and improves saccharification yield. 891 Biotechnol Biofuels 7: 1-13 892
Blum A, Ebercon A (1981) Cell membrane stability as a measure of drought and heat tolerance 893 in wheat. Crop Sci 21: 43-47 894
Blumenkrantz N, Asboe-Hansen G (1973) New method for quantitative determination of 895 uronic acids. Anal Biochem 54: 484-489 896
Bonnin E, Garnier C, Ralet MC (2014) Pectin-modifying enzymes and pectin-derived 897 materials: applications and impacts. Appl Microbiol Biot 98: 519-532 898
Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities 899 of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72: 248-254 900
Brummell DA (2006) Cell wall disassembly in ripening fruit. Funct Plant Biol 33: 103-119 901 Collmer A, Ried JL, Mount MS (1988) Assay methods for pectic enzymes. In: Wood WA, 902
Kellogg ST, eds. Methods Enzymol. San Diego, UAS: Academic Press, 329-335 903 Cosgrove DJ (2005) Growth of the plant cell wall. Nat Rev Mol Cell Bio 6: 850-861 904 Cote F, Ham KS, Hahn MG, Bergmann CW (1998) Oligosaccharide elicitors in host-pathogen 905
interactions. generation, perception, and signal transduction. Subcellular Biochemistry 906 29, 385-432 907
Dewitte W, Murray JAH (2003) The plant cell cycle. Annu Rev Plant Biol 54: 235-264 908 Dick-Perez M, Zhang Y, Hayes J, Salazar A, Zabotina OA, Hong M (2011) Structure and 909
interactions of plant cell-wall polysaccharides by two- and three-dimensional 910 magic-angle-spinning solid-state NMR. Biochemistry 50: 989-1000 911
Domingo C, Roberts K, Stacey NJ, Connerton I, Ruiz-Teran F, Mccann MC (1998) A 912 pectate lyase from Zinnia elegans is auxin inducible. Plant J 13: 17-28 913
Dominguez-Puigjaner E, Llop I, Vendrell M, Prat S (1997) A cDNA clone highly expressed in 914 ripe banana fruit shows homology to pectate lyases. Plant Physiol 114: 1071-1076 915
Duan YL, Li SP, Chen ZW, Zheng LL, Diao ZJ, Zhou YC, Lan T, Guan HZ, Pan RS, Xue Y, 916
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
31
et al (2012) Dwarf and deformed flower 1, encoding an F-box protein, is critical for 917 vegetative and floral development in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant J 72: 829-842 918
Fang CY, Zhang H, Wan J, Wu YY, Li K, Jin C, Chen W, Wang SC, Wang WS, Zhang HW, 919 et al (2016) Control of leaf senescence by an MeOH-Jasmonates cascade that is 920 epigenetically regulated by OsSRT1 in Rice. Mol Plant 9: 1366-1378 921
Ferrari S, Savatin DV, Sicilia F, Gramegna G, Cervone F, Lorenzo GD (2013) 922 Oligogalacturonides: plant damage-associated molecular patterns and regulators of 923 growth and development. Front Plant Sci 4: 30-38 924
Galbraith DW, Harkins KR, Maddox JM, Ayres NM, Sharma DP, Firoozabady E (1983) 925 Rapid flow cytometric analysis of the cell cycle in intact plant tissues. Science 220: 926 1049-1051 927
Guo LB, Chu CC, Qian Q (2006) Rice mutants and functional genomics. Chinese Bull Bot. 928 23:1-13 929
Held MA, Be E, Zemelis S, Withers S, Wilkerson C, Brandizzi F (2011) CGR3: a 930 golgi-localized protein influencing homogalacturonan methylesterification. Mol Plant 4: 931 832-844 932
Hiei Y, Ohta S, Komari T, Kumashiro T (1994) Efficient transformation of rice (Oryza sativa 933 L.) mediated by Agrobacterium and sequence analysis of the boundaries of the T-DNA. 934 Plant J 6: 271-282 935
Hongo S, Sato K, Yokoyama R, Nishitani K (2012) Demethylesterification of the primary wall 936 by PECTIN METHYLESTERASE35 provides mechanical support to the Arabidopsis 937 stem. Plant Cell 24: 2624-2634 938
Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA (2008) Systematic and integrative analysis of large 939 gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc 4: 44-57 940
Huang LM, Sun QW, Qin FJ, Li C, Zhao Y, Zhou DX (2007) Down-regulation of a SILENT 941 INFORMATION REGULATOR2-related histone deacetylase gene, OsSRT1, induces 942 DNA fragmentation and cell death in rice. Plant Physiol 144: 1508-1519 943
Iwai H, Masaoka N, Ishii T, Satoh S (2002) A pectin glucuronyltransferase gene is essential for 944 intercellular attachment in the plant meristem. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 945 16319-16324 946
Khanna-Chopra R (2012) Leaf senescence and abiotic stresses share reactive oxygen 947 species-mediated chloroplast degradation. Protoplasma 249: 469-481 948
Kim SH, Choi HS, Cho YC, Kim SR (2012) Cold-responsive regulation of a 949 Flower-Preferential Class III Peroxidase Gene, OsPOX1, in rice (Oryza sativa L.). J 950 Plant Biol 55: 123-131 951
Koch E, Slusarenko A (1990) Arabidopsis is susceptible to infection by a downy mildew fungus. 952 Plant Cell 2: 437-445 953
Krizek BA (2009) Making bigger plants: key regulators of final organ size. Curr Opin Plant Biol 954 12: 17-22 955
Kulikauskas R, McCormick S (1997) Identification of tobacco and Arabidopsis homologues of 956 the pollen-expressed Lat59 gene of tomato. Plant Mol Biol 34: 809-814 957
Laskowski M, Biller S, Stanley K, Kajstura T, Prusty R (2006) Expression profiling of 958 auxin-treated Arabidopsis roots: toward a molecular analysis of lateral root emergence. 959 Plant Cell Physiol 47: 788-792 960
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
32
Lim PO, Kim HJ, Nam HG (2007) Leaf Senescence. Annu Rev Plant Biol 58: 115-136 961 McQueen-Mason SJ, Cosgrove DJ (1995) Expansin mode of action on cell walls. Analysis of 962
wall hydrolysis, stress relaxation, and binding. Plant Physiol 107: 87-100 963 Medina-Escobar N, Cardenas J, Moyano E, Caballero JL, Munoz-Blanco J (1997) Cloning, 964
molecular characterization and expression pattern of a strawberry ripening-specific 965 cDNA with sequence homology to pectate lyase from higher plants. Plant Mol Biol 34: 966 867-877 967
Milioni D, Sado PE, Stacey NJ, Domingo C, Roberts K, Mccann MC (2001) Differential 968 expression of cell-wall-related genes during the formation of tracheary elements in the 969 Zinnia mesophyll cell system. Plant Mol Biol 47: 221-238 970
Miller G, Suzuki N, Ciftci-Yilmaz S, Mittler R (2010) Reactive oxygen species homeostasis 971 and signalling during drought and salinity stresses. Plant Cell Environ 33: 453-467 972
Nooden LD, Leopold AC (1978) Phytohormones and the endogenous regulation of senescence 973 and abscission. In: Letham DS, Goodwin PB, Higgins TJV, eds. Phytohormones and 974 related compounds: a comprehensive treatise. Amsterdam, Netherlands: 975 Elsevier/NorthHolland Biomedical Press, 329-369. 976
Nunan KJ, Davies C, Robinson SP, Fincher GB (2001) Expression patterns of cell 977 wall-modifying enzymes during grape berry development. Planta 214: 257-264 978
Ogawa M, Kay P, Wilson S, Swain SM (2009) Arabidopsis dehiscence zone 979 polygalacturonase1 (ADPG1), ADPG2, and QUARTET2 are polygalacturonases 980 required for cell separation during reproductive development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 981 21: 216-233 982
Palusa SG, Golovkin M, Shin SB, Richardson DN, Reddy ASN (2007) Organ-specific, 983 developmental, hormonal and stress regulation of expression of putative pectate lyase 984 genes in Arabidopsis. New Phytol 174: 537-550 985
Park YB, Cosgrove DJ (2012) A revised architecture of primary cell walls based on 986 biomechanical changes induced by substrate-specific endoglucanases. Plant Physiol 158: 987 1933-1943 988
Peaucelle A, Braybrook S, Leguillou L, Bron E, Kuhlemeier C, Hofte H (2011) 989 Pectin-induced changes in cell wall mechanics underlie organ initiation in Arabidopsis. 990 Curr Biol 21: 1720-1726 991
Petersen TN, Brunak S, Heijne GV, Nielsen H (2011) SIGNALP 4.0: discriminating signal 992 peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat Methods 8: 785-786 993
Pien S, Wyrzykowska J, Mcqueen-Mason S, Smart C, Fleming A (2001) Local expression of 994 expansin induces the entire process of leaf development and modifies leaf shape. Proc 995 Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 11812-11817 996
Pua EC, Ong CK, Liu P, Liu JZ (2001) Isolation and expression of two pectate lyase genes 997 during fruit ripening of banana (Musa acuminata). Physiol Plantarum 113: 92-99 998
Ramirez-Parra E, Desvoyes B, Gutierrez C (2005) Balance between cell division and 999 differentiation during plant development. Int J Dev Biol 49: 467-477 1000
Ren DY, Rao YC, Leng YJ, Li ZZ, Xu QK, Wu LW, Qiu ZN, Xue DW, Zeng DL, Hu J, et al 1001 (2016) Regulatory role of OsMADS34 in the determination of glumes fate, grain yield 1002 and quality in rice. Front Plant Sci 7: 1853 1003
Ridley BL, O'Neill MA, Mohnen D (2001) Pectins: structure, biosynthesis, and 1004
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
33
oligogalacturonide-related signaling. Phytochemistry 57: 929-967 1005 Rogers HJ, Harvey A, Lonsdale DM (1992) Isolation and characterization of a tobacco gene 1006
with homology to pectate lyase which is specifically expressed during 1007 microsporogenesis. Plant Mol Biol 20: 493-502 1008
Romualdi C, Bortoluzzi S, D'Alessi F, Danieli GA (2003) IDEG6: a web tool for detection of 1009 differentially expressed genes in multiple tag sampling experiments. Physiol Genomics 1010 12: 159-162 1011
Sakuraba Y, Rahman ML, Cho SH, Kim YS, Koh HJ, Yoo SC, Paek NC (2013) The rice 1012 faded green leaf locus encodes protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase B and is essential for 1013 chlorophyll synthesis under high light conditions. Plant J 74: 122-133 1014
Simeonova E, Sikora A, Charzyńska M, Mostowska A (2000) Aspects of programmed cell 1015 death during leaf senescence of mono- and dicotyledonous plants. Protoplasma 214: 1016 93-101. 1017
Somerville C, Bauer S, Brininstool G, Facette M, Hamann T, Milne J, Osborne E, Paredez 1018 A, Persson S, Raab T, et al (2004) Toward a systems approach to understanding plant 1019 cell walls. Science 306: 2206-2211 1020
Song XQ, Liu LF, Jiang YJ, Zhang BC, Gao YP, Liu XL, Lin QS, Ling HQ, Zhou YH (2013) 1021 Disruption of secondary wall cellulose biosynthesis alters cadmium translocation and 1022 tolerance in rice plants. Mol Plant 6: 768-780 1023
Sun L, Nocker SV (2010) Analysis of promoter activity of members of the PECTATE 1024 LYASE-LIKE (PLL) gene family in cell separation in Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biol 10: 1025 152-152 1026
Tan JJ, Tan ZH, Wu FQ, Sheng PK, Heng YQ, Wang XH, Ren YL, Wang JL, Guo XP, 1027 Zhang X, et al (2014) A novel chloroplast-localized pentatricopeptide repeat protein 1028 involved in splicing affects chloroplast development and abiotic stress response in rice. 1029 Mol Plant 7: 1329-1349 1030
Tan L, Eberhard S, Pattathil S, Warder C, Glushka J, Yuan C, Hao Z, Zhu X, Avci U, 1031 Miller JS, et al (2013) An Arabidopsis cell wall proteoglycan consists of pectin and 1032 arabinoxylan covalently linked to an arabinogalactan protein. Plant Cell 25: 270-287 1033
Updegraff DM (1969) Semimicro determination of cellulose in biological material. Anal 1034 Biochem 32: 420-424 1035
Van Sandt VS, Suslov D, Verbelen JP, Vissenberg K (2007) Xyloglucan endotransglucosylase 1036 activity loosens a plant cell wall. Ann Bot 100: 1467-1473 1037
Verhertbruggen Y, Marcus SE, Haeger A, Ordaz-Ortiz JJ, Knox JP (2009) An extended set 1038 of monoclonal antibodies to pectic homogalacturonan. Carbohyd Res 344: 1858-1862 1039
Vincken JP, Schols HA, Oomen RJFJ, McCann MC, Ulvskov P, Voragen AGJ, Visser RGF 1040 (2003) If homogalacturonan were a side chain of rhamnogalacturonan I. Implications for 1041 cell wall architecture. Plant Physiol 132: 1781-1789 1042
Vogel JP, Raab TK, Schiff C, Somerville SC (2002) PMR6, a pectate lyase-like gene required 1043 for powdery mildew susceptibility in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 14: 2095-2106 1044
Wang HH, Guo Y, Lv FN, Zhu HY, Wu SJ, Jiang YJ, Li FF, Zhou BL, Guo WZ, Zhang TZ 1045 (2010) The essential role of GhPEL gene, encoding a pectate lyase, in cell wall 1046 loosening by depolymerization of the de-esterified pectin during fiber elongation in 1047 cotton. Plant Mol Biol 72: 397-406 1048
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
34
Wang X, Fang G, Li Y, Ding M, Gong HY, Li YS (2013) Differential antioxidant responses to 1049 cold stress in cell suspension cultures of two subspecies of rice. Plant Cell Tiss Org 113: 1050 353-361 1051
Wang ZH, Wang Y, Hong X, Hu DH, Liu CX, Yang J, Li Y, Huang YQ, Feng YQ, Gong HY, 1052 et al (2015) Functional inactivation of UDP-N-acetylglucosamine pyrophosphorylase 1 1053 (UAP1) induces early leaf senescence and defence responses in rice. J Exp Bot 66: 1054 973-987 1055
Willats WGT, Mccartney L, Knox JP (2001) In-situ analysis of pectic polysaccharides in seed 1056 mucilage and at the root surface of Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta 213: 37-44 1057
Wing RA, Yamaguchi J, Larabell SK, Ursin VM, Mccormick S (1989) Molecular and genetic 1058 characterization of two pollen-expressed genes that have sequence similarity to pectate 1059 lyases of the plant pathogen Erwinia. Plant Mol Biol 14: 17-28 1060
Wolf S, Hematy K, Hofte H (2012) Growth control and cell wall signaling in plants. Annu Rev 1061 Plant Biol 63: 381-407 1062
Wolf S, Mouille G, Pelloux J (2009) Homogalacturonan methyl-esterification and plant 1063 development. Mol Plant 2: 851-860 1064
Wu HB, Wang B, Chen YL, Liu YG, Chen LT (2013) Characterization and fine mapping of the 1065 rice premature senescence mutant ospse1. Theor App Genet 126: 1897-1907 1066
Wu YZ, Qiu X, Du S, Erickson L (1996) PO149, a new member of pollen pectate lyase-like 1067 gene family from alfalfa. Plant Mol Biol 32: 1037-1042 1068
Xiao C, Somerville C, Anderson CT (2014) POLYGALACTURONASE INVOLVED IN 1069 EXPANSION1 functions in cell elongation and flower development in Arabidopsis. 1070 Plant Cell 26: 1018-1035 1071
Yadav S, Yadav PK, Yadav D, Yadav KDS (2009) Pectin lyase: A review. Process Biochem 44: 1072 1-10 1073
Yang JL, Li YY, Zhang YJ, Zhang SS, Wu YR, Wu P, Zheng SJ (2008) Cell wall 1074 polysaccharides are specifically involved in the exclusion of aluminum from the rice 1075 root apex. Plant Physiol 146: 602-611 1076
Yang YL, Xu J, Huang LC, Leng YJ, Dai LP, Rao YC, Chen L, Wang YQ, Tu ZJ, Hu J, et 1077 al (2015) PGL, encoding chlorophyllide a oxygenase 1, impacts leaf senescence and 1078 indirectly affects grain yield and quality in rice. J Exp Bot 67: 1297-1310 1079
Yu LH, Chen X, Wang Z, Wang SM, Wang YP, Zhu QS, Li SG, Xiang CB (2013) 1080 Arabidopsis Enhanced Drought Tolerance1/HOMEODOMAIN GLABROUS11 confers 1081 drought tolerance in transgenic rice without yield penalty. Plant Physiol 162: 1378-1391 1082
Zhang M, Zhang BC, Qian Q, Yu YC, Li R, Zhang JW, Liu XL, Zeng DL, Li JY, Zhou YH 1083 (2010) Brittle Culm 12, a dual-targeting kinesin-4 protein, controls cell-cycle 1084 progression and wall properties in rice. Plant J 63: 312-328 1085
Zhang SJ, Song XQ, Yu BS, Zhang BC, Sun CQ, Knox JP, Zhou YH (2012) Identification of 1086 quantitative trait loci affecting hemicellulose characteristics based on cell wall 1087 composition in a wild and cultivated rice species. Mol Plant 5: 162-175 1088
Zhong H, Lauchli A (1993) Changes of cell wall composition and polymer size in primary roots 1089 of cotton seedlings under high salinity. J Exp Bot 44: 773-778 1090
Zhou B, Guo Z (2009) Calcium is involved in the abscisic acid-induced ascorbate peroxidase, 1091 superoxide dismutase and chilling resistance in Stylosanthes guianensis. Biol Plantarum 1092
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
35
53: 63-68 1093 Zou HY, Wenwen YH, Zang GC, Kang ZH, Zhang ZY, Huang JL, Wang GX (2015) 1094
OsEXPB2, a β-expansin gene, is involved in rice root system architecture. Mol Breeding 35: 1095 1-14 1096
1097
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
1
Figure 1. Comparison of phenotype between wild-type and del1 plants
(a) Wild-type (Nipponbare, left) and del1 plants (right) 5 days after sowing. Scale bar
= 2 cm. (b) Root length of wild-type (left) and del1 plants (right) 5 days after sowing.
Scale bar = 1 cm. (c and d) Statistical analysis of root length and lateral root number
between wild-type and del1 plants. Twenty plants were measured. Error bars indicate
SD, ** indicates P<0.01 (Student’s t-test). (e) Wild-type (left) and del1 plants (right) at
maturity. Scale bar = 10 cm. (f and g) Statistical analysis of plant height and tiller
number between wild-type and del1 plants. Twenty plants were measured. Error bars
indicate SD, ** indicates P<0.01 (Student’s t-test). (h) Phenotype of panicle between
wild-type (left) and del1 (right) plants. Scale bar = 5 cm. (i) Floret with the lemma
removed, wild-type (left) and del1 (right). Scale bar = 0.5 cm. (j) Mature seed and
brown rice of wild-type (left) and del1 (right). Scale bar = 0.5 cm. (k) and (l)
Statistical analysis of panicle length and thousand grain weight between wild-type and
del1 plants. Twenty panicles were measured. Error bars indicate SD, ** indicates
P<0.01 (Student’s t-test).
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
1
Figure 2. Histological characterization of culms in wild-type and del1 plants
(a–d) Cross sections of internode II of wild-type (a) and del1 (b). Scale bar = 500 μm.
(c) Magnification of (a), (d) magnification of (b); white rectangle shows a
magnification of the sclerenchyma cell layer. Scale bar = 50 μm. (e and f) Statistical
analysis of cell number and sclerenchyma cell layer number between wild-type and
del1 plants, means ± SD of five independent replicates. (g and h) Longitudinal
sections of internode II of wild-type (g) and del1 (h). Scale bar = 50 μm. (i and j)
Statistical analysis of the cell length and cell width between wild-type and del1 plants,
mean ± SD of 30 cells. ** indicates P<0.01 (Student’s t-test). (k) Number of
parenchyma cells (PCs) for internode II of wild-type and del1 plants, means ± SD of
five independent replicates.
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
1
Figure 3. Cell cycle analysis of wild-type and del1 plants
(a and b) Flow karyotype histogram of wild-type (a) and del1 (b) leaves. (c)
Quantification of the DNA profiles of wild-type and del1 plants. (d) Relative
expression levels of cell-cycle-related genes in wild-type and del1 plants, means ± SD
of three independent replicates. * indicates P<0.05, ** indicates P<0.01 (Student’s
t-test).
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
1
Figure 4. Leaf phenotype and identification of leaf senescence in DEL1
(a–d) Leaf phenotype from young (a), tillering (b, c), and heading (d) stages. Scale
bars = 1 cm, 5 cm, 5 cm and 1 cm, respectively. (e) Statistical analysis of chlorophyll
content between wild-type and del1 plants, means ± SD of five independent replicates.
** indicates P<0.01 (Student’s t-test). (f and g) Transmission electron microscopy
analysis of senescence leaves of wild-type (f) and del1 plants (g). Scale bar = 0.5 μm.
(h) Statistical analysis of photosynthesis rate between wild-type and del1 plants,
means ± SD of five independent replicates. ** indicates P<0.01 (Student’s t-test). (i)
Relative expression levels of senescence-related genes and transcription factors in
wild-type and del1 plants, means ± SD of three independent replicates. * indicates
P<0.05, ** indicates P<0.01 (Student’s t-test).
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
1
Figure 5. ROS accumulation and enhancement of PCD in wild-type and del1
leaves
(a and b) NBT and DAB staining of leaves between the wild-type (left) and del1
plants (right). (c–e) Statistical analysis of electrolyte leakage (c), SOD activity (d),
and POD activity (e) in leaves between wild-type and del1 plants, means ± SD of five
independent replicates. ** indicates P<0.01 (Student’s t-test). (f) Relative expression
levels of ROS detoxification-related genes in wild-type and del1 plants, means ± SD
of three independent replicates. ** indicates P<0.01 (Student’s t-test). (g) Trypan blue
staining of leaves in wild-type (left) and del1 plants (right). (h–k) TUNEL assay of
leaves. DAPI staining of wild-type (h) and del1 plants (j). Positive results of wild-type
(i) and del1 plants (k), scale bar = 50 μm.
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
1
Figure 6. Map-based cloning and identification of DEL1
(a) Fine mapping of DEL1. The del1 locus was mapped to a 45-kb region on
chromosome 10. (b) Schematic diagram of DEL1. Black rectangles represent exons.
Black inverted triangle represents mutant site. (c) Sequencing analysis of the DEL1
transcripts in T0 transgenic lines. (d and e) Phenotype of the complementation
transgenic line: wild-type (left), complementation transgenic line (middle) and empty
vector control (right). Scale bars = 10 cm and 4 cm, respectively. (f) Expression levels
of DEL1 detected by qRT-PCR in wild-type and transgenic plants, means ± SD of
three independent replicates. (g–i) Statistical analysis of plant height (g), tiller number
(h), and flag leaf length (i) in wild-type and transgenic plants, means ± SD of ten
independent replicates.
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
1
Figure 7. Prediction of the primary sequence and phylogenetic analysis of DEL1
(a) The deduced amino acid sequence of DEL1. Numbers on the left refer to the
positions of amino acid residues. The signal peptide is indicated with an underline; the
PelC domain is shown by a dotted line; the conserved residues involved in Ca2+
binding (red background), disulfide bonds (orange background), catalysis (blue
background), and substrate binding (purple background) (b) Phylogenetic tree of PEL
in Arabidopsis thaliana, Oryza sativa L., and other plants. The numbers at each node
represent the bootstrap support (percentage), and scale bar is an indicator of genetic
distance based on branch length.
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
1
Figure 8. Expression analysis of DEL1
(a) Transcription level of DEL1 in various organs, means ± SD of three independent
replicates. YR, young root; YL, young leaf; YS, young sheath; MR, mature root; C,
culm; ML, mature leaf; MS, mature sheath; P, panicle; S, spikelet. (b–j) GUS analysis
of DEL1 expression: (b and c) Four and seven days after germination of the young
plant, scale bar = 1 cm; (d) root, scale bar = 500 μm; (e) lateral root, scale bar = 250
μm; (f) mature sheath, scale bar = 1 cm; (g) mature leaf, scale bar = 1 cm; (h) culm,
scale bar = 1 cm; (i) spikelet, scale bar = 1 cm; (j) lemma and palea were removed in
(i), scale bar = 500 μm.
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
1
Figure 9. The levels of PEL activity and cell wall composition and structure in
wild-type and del1 plants
(a) Analysis of PEL activity in wild-type and del1 plants, means ± SD of five
independent replicates. ** indicates P<0.01 (Student’s t-test). (b) Comparison of cell
wall composition between wild-type and del1 plants, means ± SD of five independent
replicates. **indicates P<0.01 (Student’s t-test). HC 1: hemicellulose 1, HC 2:
hemicellulose 2. (c) Neutral monosaccharide composition between wild-type and del1
plants, means ± SE of five independent replicates, ** indicates P<0.01 (Student’s
t-test). (d and e) Transmission electron microscopy micrographs of the bundle sheath
fiber cells of wild-type (d) and del1 (e) plants, scale bar = 1 μm. (f) Magnification in
(d), and (g) magnification in (e), scale bar = 0.2 μm. ml: middle lamella, pw: primary
cell wall, sw: secondary cell wall, pm: plasma membrane, c: cytoplasm. (h–j)
Statistical analysis of the middle lamella (h) , primary cell wall (i), and secondary cell
wall (j) thicknesses of bundle sheath fiber cells between the wild-type and del1 plants,
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
2
mean ± SD of 30 cells, ** indicates P<0.01 (Student’s t-test).
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
1
Figure 10. Immunohistochemical localization of HG in culm sections of wild-type
and del1 plants
(a–t) Immunolocalization of HG of wild-type (a, c) and del1 plants (b, d) with JIM7,
wild-type (e, g) and del1 plants (f, h) with JIM5, wild-type (i, k) and del1 plants (j, l)
with LM18, wild-type (m, o) and del1 plants (n, p) with LM19, wild-type (q, s) and
del1 plants (r, t) with 2F4. Scale bar = 50 μm.
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
1
Figure 11. A schematic model of DEL1 function in rice Homogalacturonan is secreted in a highly methylesterified form and selectively
demethylesterified by PME. The demethylesterified HG might be cleaved by DEL1
and other PELs or PGs, The alternative of the cell wall regulated the cell cycle/
expansion and ROS, enabling normal rice growth and leaf senescence process.
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Parsed CitationsAnderson CT, Carroll A, Akhmetova L, Somerville C (2010) Real-time imaging of cellulose reorientation during cell wall expansionin Arabidopsis roots. Plant Physiol 152: 787-796
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Apel K, Hirt H (2004) Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annu Rev Plant Biol 55: 728-749
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Atmodjo MA, Hao Z, Mohnen D (2013) Evolving views of pectin biosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Biol 64: 747-779Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Barras F, Gijsegem FV, Chatterjee AK (1994) Extracellular enzymes and pathogenesis of soft-rot Erwinia. Annu Rev Phytopathol 32:201-234
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Biswal AK, Soeno K, Gandla ML, Immerzeel P, Pattathil S, Lucenius J, Serimaa R, Hahn MG, Moritz T, Jonsson LJ, et al (2014)Aspen pectate lyase PtxtPL1-27 mobilizes matrix polysaccharides from woody tissues and improves saccharification yield.Biotechnol Biofuels 7: 1-13
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Blum A, Ebercon A (1981) Cell membrane stability as a measure of drought and heat tolerance in wheat. Crop Sci 21: 43-47Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Blumenkrantz N, Asboe-Hansen G (1973) New method for quantitative determination of uronic acids. Anal Biochem 54: 484-489Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Bonnin E, Garnier C, Ralet MC (2014) Pectin-modifying enzymes and pectin-derived materials: applications and impacts. ApplMicrobiol Biot 98: 519-532
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle ofprotein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72: 248-254
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Brummell DA (2006) Cell wall disassembly in ripening fruit. Funct Plant Biol 33: 103-119Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Collmer A, Ried JL, Mount MS (1988) Assay methods for pectic enzymes. In: Wood WA, Kellogg ST, eds. Methods Enzymol. SanDiego, UAS: Academic Press, 329-335
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cosgrove DJ (2005) Growth of the plant cell wall. Nat Rev Mol Cell Bio 6: 850-861Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cote F, Ham KS, Hahn MG, Bergmann CW (1998) Oligosaccharide elicitors in host-pathogen interactions. generation, perception,and signal transduction. Subcellular Biochemistry 29, 385-432
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Dewitte W, Murray JAH (2003) The plant cell cycle. Annu Rev Plant Biol 54: 235-264Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from
Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Dick-Perez M, Zhang Y, Hayes J, Salazar A, Zabotina OA, Hong M (2011) Structure and interactions of plant cell-wallpolysaccharides by two- and three-dimensional magic-angle-spinning solid-state NMR. Biochemistry 50: 989-1000
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Domingo C, Roberts K, Stacey NJ, Connerton I, Ruiz-Teran F, Mccann MC (1998) A pectate lyase from Zinnia elegans is auxininducible. Plant J 13: 17-28
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Dominguez-Puigjaner E, Llop I, Vendrell M, Prat S (1997) A cDNA clone highly expressed in ripe banana fruit shows homology topectate lyases. Plant Physiol 114: 1071-1076
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Duan YL, Li SP, Chen ZW, Zheng LL, Diao ZJ, Zhou YC, Lan T, Guan HZ, Pan RS, Xue Y, et al (2012) Dwarf and deformed flower 1,encoding an F-box protein, is critical for vegetative and floral development in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant J 72: 829-842
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fang CY, Zhang H, Wan J, Wu YY, Li K, Jin C, Chen W, Wang SC, Wang WS, Zhang HW, et al (2016) Control of leaf senescence by anMeOH-Jasmonates cascade that is epigenetically regulated by OsSRT1 in Rice. Mol Plant 9: 1366-1378
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ferrari S, Savatin DV, Sicilia F, Gramegna G, Cervone F, Lorenzo GD (2013) Oligogalacturonides: plant damage-associatedmolecular patterns and regulators of growth and development. Front Plant Sci 4: 30-38
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Galbraith DW, Harkins KR, Maddox JM, Ayres NM, Sharma DP, Firoozabady E (1983) Rapid flow cytometric analysis of the cell cyclein intact plant tissues. Science 220: 1049-1051
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Guo LB, Chu CC, Qian Q (2006) Rice mutants and functional genomics. Chinese Bull Bot. 23:1-13Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Held MA, Be E, Zemelis S, Withers S, Wilkerson C, Brandizzi F (2011) CGR3: a golgi-localized protein influencinghomogalacturonan methylesterification. Mol Plant 4: 832-844
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hiei Y, Ohta S, Komari T, Kumashiro T (1994) Efficient transformation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) mediated by Agrobacterium andsequence analysis of the boundaries of the T-DNA. Plant J 6: 271-282
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hongo S, Sato K, Yokoyama R, Nishitani K (2012) Demethylesterification of the primary wall by PECTIN METHYLESTERASE35provides mechanical support to the Arabidopsis stem. Plant Cell 24: 2624-2634
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA (2008) Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformaticsresources. Nat Protoc 4: 44-57
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Huang LM, Sun QW, Qin FJ, Li C, Zhao Y, Zhou DX (2007) Down-regulation of a SILENT INFORMATION REGULATOR2-relatedhistone deacetylase gene, OsSRT1, induces DNA fragmentation and cell death in rice. Plant Physiol 144: 1508-1519
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Iwai H, Masaoka N, Ishii T, Satoh S (2002) A pectin glucuronyltransferase gene is essential for intercellular attachment in the plantmeristem. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 16319-16324
Pubmed: Author and Title www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
CrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Khanna-Chopra R (2012) Leaf senescence and abiotic stresses share reactive oxygen species-mediated chloroplast degradation.Protoplasma 249: 469-481
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim SH, Choi HS, Cho YC, Kim SR (2012) Cold-responsive regulation of a Flower-Preferential Class III Peroxidase Gene, OsPOX1,in rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Plant Biol 55: 123-131
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Koch E, Slusarenko A (1990) Arabidopsis is susceptible to infection by a downy mildew fungus. Plant Cell 2: 437-445Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Krizek BA (2009) Making bigger plants: key regulators of final organ size. Curr Opin Plant Biol 12: 17-22Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kulikauskas R, McCormick S (1997) Identification of tobacco and Arabidopsis homologues of the pollen-expressed Lat59 gene oftomato. Plant Mol Biol 34: 809-814
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Laskowski M, Biller S, Stanley K, Kajstura T, Prusty R (2006) Expression profiling of auxin-treated Arabidopsis roots: toward amolecular analysis of lateral root emergence. Plant Cell Physiol 47: 788-792
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lim PO, Kim HJ, Nam HG (2007) Leaf Senescence. Annu Rev Plant Biol 58: 115-136Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
McQueen-Mason SJ, Cosgrove DJ (1995) Expansin mode of action on cell walls. Analysis of wall hydrolysis, stress relaxation, andbinding. Plant Physiol 107: 87-100
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Medina-Escobar N, Cardenas J, Moyano E, Caballero JL, Munoz-Blanco J (1997) Cloning, molecular characterization andexpression pattern of a strawberry ripening-specific cDNA with sequence homology to pectate lyase from higher plants. Plant MolBiol 34: 867-877
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Milioni D, Sado PE, Stacey NJ, Domingo C, Roberts K, Mccann MC (2001) Differential expression of cell-wall-related genes duringthe formation of tracheary elements in the Zinnia mesophyll cell system. Plant Mol Biol 47: 221-238
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Miller G, Suzuki N, Ciftci-Yilmaz S, Mittler R (2010) Reactive oxygen species homeostasis and signalling during drought andsalinity stresses. Plant Cell Environ 33: 453-467
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Nooden LD, Leopold AC (1978) Phytohormones and the endogenous regulation of senescence and abscission. In: Letham DS,Goodwin PB, Higgins TJV, eds. Phytohormones and related compounds: a comprehensive treatise. Amsterdam, Netherlands:Elsevier/NorthHolland Biomedical Press, 329-369.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Nunan KJ, Davies C, Robinson SP, Fincher GB (2001) Expression patterns of cell wall-modifying enzymes during grape berrydevelopment. Planta 214: 257-264
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ogawa M, Kay P, Wilson S, Swain SM (2009) Arabidopsis dehiscence zone polygalacturonase1 (ADPG1), ADPG2, and QUARTET2 www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
are polygalacturonases required for cell separation during reproductive development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 21: 216-233Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Palusa SG, Golovkin M, Shin SB, Richardson DN, Reddy ASN (2007) Organ-specific, developmental, hormonal and stressregulation of expression of putative pectate lyase genes in Arabidopsis. New Phytol 174: 537-550
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Park YB, Cosgrove DJ (2012) A revised architecture of primary cell walls based on biomechanical changes induced by substrate-specific endoglucanases. Plant Physiol 158: 1933-1943
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Peaucelle A, Braybrook S, Leguillou L, Bron E, Kuhlemeier C, Hofte H (2011) Pectin-induced changes in cell wall mechanicsunderlie organ initiation in Arabidopsis. Curr Biol 21: 1720-1726
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Petersen TN, Brunak S, Heijne GV, Nielsen H (2011) SIGNALP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. NatMethods 8: 785-786
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Pien S, Wyrzykowska J, Mcqueen-Mason S, Smart C, Fleming A (2001) Local expression of expansin induces the entire process ofleaf development and modifies leaf shape. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 11812-11817
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Pua EC, Ong CK, Liu P, Liu JZ (2001) Isolation and expression of two pectate lyase genes during fruit ripening of banana (Musaacuminata). Physiol Plantarum 113: 92-99
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ramirez-Parra E, Desvoyes B, Gutierrez C (2005) Balance between cell division and differentiation during plant development. Int JDev Biol 49: 467-477
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ren DY, Rao YC, Leng YJ, Li ZZ, Xu QK, Wu LW, Qiu ZN, Xue DW, Zeng DL, Hu J, et al (2016) Regulatory role of OsMADS34 in thedetermination of glumes fate, grain yield and quality in rice. Front Plant Sci 7: 1853
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ridley BL, O'Neill MA, Mohnen D (2001) Pectins: structure, biosynthesis, and oligogalacturonide-related signaling. Phytochemistry57: 929-967
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Rogers HJ, Harvey A, Lonsdale DM (1992) Isolation and characterization of a tobacco gene with homology to pectate lyase which isspecifically expressed during microsporogenesis. Plant Mol Biol 20: 493-502
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Romualdi C, Bortoluzzi S, D'Alessi F, Danieli GA (2003) IDEG6: a web tool for detection of differentially expressed genes inmultiple tag sampling experiments. Physiol Genomics 12: 159-162
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sakuraba Y, Rahman ML, Cho SH, Kim YS, Koh HJ, Yoo SC, Paek NC (2013) The rice faded green leaf locus encodesprotochlorophyllide oxidoreductase B and is essential for chlorophyll synthesis under high light conditions. Plant J 74: 122-133
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Simeonova E, Sikora A, Charzynska M, Mostowska A (2000) Aspects of programmed cell death during leaf senescence of mono-and dicotyledonous plants. Protoplasma 214: 93-101.
Pubmed: Author and Title www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from
Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
CrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Somerville C, Bauer S, Brininstool G, Facette M, Hamann T, Milne J, Osborne E, Paredez A, Persson S, Raab T, et al (2004) Towarda systems approach to understanding plant cell walls. Science 306: 2206-2211
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Song XQ, Liu LF, Jiang YJ, Zhang BC, Gao YP, Liu XL, Lin QS, Ling HQ, Zhou YH (2013) Disruption of secondary wall cellulosebiosynthesis alters cadmium translocation and tolerance in rice plants. Mol Plant 6: 768-780
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sun L, Nocker SV (2010) Analysis of promoter activity of members of the PECTATE LYASE-LIKE (PLL) gene family in cellseparation in Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biol 10: 152-152
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Tan JJ, Tan ZH, Wu FQ, Sheng PK, Heng YQ, Wang XH, Ren YL, Wang JL, Guo XP, Zhang X, et al (2014) A novel chloroplast-localized pentatricopeptide repeat protein involved in splicing affects chloroplast development and abiotic stress response inrice. Mol Plant 7: 1329-1349
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Tan L, Eberhard S, Pattathil S, Warder C, Glushka J, Yuan C, Hao Z, Zhu X, Avci U, Miller JS, et al (2013) An Arabidopsis cell wallproteoglycan consists of pectin and arabinoxylan covalently linked to an arabinogalactan protein. Plant Cell 25: 270-287
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Updegraff DM (1969) Semimicro determination of cellulose in biological material. Anal Biochem 32: 420-424Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Van Sandt VS, Suslov D, Verbelen JP, Vissenberg K (2007) Xyloglucan endotransglucosylase activity loosens a plant cell wall. AnnBot 100: 1467-1473
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Verhertbruggen Y, Marcus SE, Haeger A, Ordaz-Ortiz JJ, Knox JP (2009) An extended set of monoclonal antibodies to pectichomogalacturonan. Carbohyd Res 344: 1858-1862
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Vincken JP, Schols HA, Oomen RJFJ, McCann MC, Ulvskov P, Voragen AGJ, Visser RGF (2003) If homogalacturonan were a sidechain of rhamnogalacturonan I. Implications for cell wall architecture. Plant Physiol 132: 1781-1789
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Vogel JP, Raab TK, Schiff C, Somerville SC (2002) PMR6, a pectate lyase-like gene required for powdery mildew susceptibility inArabidopsis. Plant Cell 14: 2095-2106
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang HH, Guo Y, Lv FN, Zhu HY, Wu SJ, Jiang YJ, Li FF, Zhou BL, Guo WZ, Zhang TZ (2010) The essential role of GhPEL gene,encoding a pectate lyase, in cell wall loosening by depolymerization of the de-esterified pectin during fiber elongation in cotton.Plant Mol Biol 72: 397-406
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang X, Fang G, Li Y, Ding M, Gong HY, Li YS (2013) Differential antioxidant responses to cold stress in cell suspension culturesof two subspecies of rice. Plant Cell Tiss Org 113: 353-361
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang ZH, Wang Y, Hong X, Hu DH, Liu CX, Yang J, Li Y, Huang YQ, Feng YQ, Gong HY, et al (2015) Functional inactivation of UDP-N-acetylglucosamine pyrophosphorylase 1 (UAP1) induces early leaf senescence and defence responses in rice. J Exp Bot 66:973-987
Pubmed: Author and Title www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from
Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
CrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Willats WGT, Mccartney L, Knox JP (2001) In-situ analysis of pectic polysaccharides in seed mucilage and at the root surface ofArabidopsis thaliana. Planta 213: 37-44
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wing RA, Yamaguchi J, Larabell SK, Ursin VM, Mccormick S (1989) Molecular and genetic characterization of two pollen-expressedgenes that have sequence similarity to pectate lyases of the plant pathogen Erwinia. Plant Mol Biol 14: 17-28
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wolf S, Hematy K, Hofte H (2012) Growth control and cell wall signaling in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 63: 381-407Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wolf S, Mouille G, Pelloux J (2009) Homogalacturonan methyl-esterification and plant development. Mol Plant 2: 851-860Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu HB, Wang B, Chen YL, Liu YG, Chen LT (2013) Characterization and fine mapping of the rice premature senescence mutantospse1. Theor App Genet 126: 1897-1907
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu YZ, Qiu X, Du S, Erickson L (1996) PO149, a new member of pollen pectate lyase-like gene family from alfalfa. Plant Mol Biol 32:1037-1042
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Xiao C, Somerville C, Anderson CT (2014) POLYGALACTURONASE INVOLVED IN EXPANSION1 functions in cell elongation andflower development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 26: 1018-1035
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yadav S, Yadav PK, Yadav D, Yadav KDS (2009) Pectin lyase: A review. Process Biochem 44: 1-10Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yang JL, Li YY, Zhang YJ, Zhang SS, Wu YR, Wu P, Zheng SJ (2008) Cell wall polysaccharides are specifically involved in theexclusion of aluminum from the rice root apex. Plant Physiol 146: 602-611
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yang YL, Xu J, Huang LC, Leng YJ, Dai LP, Rao YC, Chen L, Wang YQ, Tu ZJ, Hu J, et al (2015) PGL, encoding chlorophyllide aoxygenase 1, impacts leaf senescence and indirectly affects grain yield and quality in rice. J Exp Bot 67: 1297-1310
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu LH, Chen X, Wang Z, Wang SM, Wang YP, Zhu QS, Li SG, Xiang CB (2013) Arabidopsis Enhanced DroughtTolerance1/HOMEODOMAIN GLABROUS11 confers drought tolerance in transgenic rice without yield penalty. Plant Physiol 162:1378-1391
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang M, Zhang BC, Qian Q, Yu YC, Li R, Zhang JW, Liu XL, Zeng DL, Li JY, Zhou YH (2010) Brittle Culm 12, a dual-targetingkinesin-4 protein, controls cell-cycle progression and wall properties in rice. Plant J 63: 312-328
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang SJ, Song XQ, Yu BS, Zhang BC, Sun CQ, Knox JP, Zhou YH (2012) Identification of quantitative trait loci affectinghemicellulose characteristics based on cell wall composition in a wild and cultivated rice species. Mol Plant 5: 162-175
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhong H, Lauchli A (1993) Changes of cell wall composition and polymer size in primary roots of cotton seedlings under highsalinity. J Exp Bot 44: 773-778 www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from
Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou B, Guo Z (2009) Calcium is involved in the abscisic acid-induced ascorbate peroxidase, superoxide dismutase and chillingresistance in Stylosanthes guianensis. Biol Plantarum 53: 63-68
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zou HY, Wenwen YH, Zang GC, Kang ZH, Zhang ZY, Huang JL, Wang GX (2015) OsEXPB2, a ß-expansin gene, is involved in riceroot system architecture. Mol Breeding 35: 1-14
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 7, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.