1 running head: es1 affects water loss 2 corresponding authors: … · 156 senescence marker genes,...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Running Head: ES1 affects water loss 1
2
Corresponding authors: 3
Dali Zeng 4
5
State Key Laboratory of Rice Biology, China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou 6
310006, China 7
8
Tel: (+0571)6337 0537 9
Fax: (+0571)6337 0389 10
E-mail: [email protected] 11
12
Research Area: Genes, Development and Evolution13
Plant Physiology Preview. Published on August 4, 2015, as DOI:10.1104/pp.15.00991
Copyright 2015 by the American Society of Plant Biologists
www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
2
14
EARLY SENESCENCE 1 Encodes a SCAR-like Protein2 that Affects Water 15
Loss in Rice 16
Yuchun Rao†, Yaolong Yang†, Jie Xu†, Xiaojing Li, Yujia Leng, Liping Dai, Lichao Huang, 17
Guosheng Shao, Deyong Ren, Jiang Hu, Longbiao Guo, Jianwei Pan, Dali Zeng* 18
19
State Key Laboratory of Rice Biology, China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou 20
310006, China (Y.R., Y.Y., J.X., Y.L., L.D., L.H., G.S., D.R., J.H., L.G. and D.Z.); College of 21
Chemistry and Life Sciences, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, China (Y.R., X.L 22
and J.P.); Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of 23
Education, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China (Y.Y. and J.X.) 24
25
26
One sentence summary: 27
The SCAR/WAVE-like protein2 affects water loss by regulating stomatal density in rice 28
29
Total word count: 10652 30
Total characters (including space): 67804 31
32
www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
3
33 34
Footnotes 35
36 1This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China 37
(31201183, 31221004, 31171531, 31171520, and 91435105), the State Key Basic Research 38
Program (2013CBA01403), the Ministry of Agriculture of China for transgenic research 39
(No.2013ZX08009003-001), and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 40
(2014M561108). 41
42
43
*Corresponding author e-mail: [email protected] 44
45
46
47 1 The author responsible for the distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in 48
this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors 49
(www.plantphysiol.org) is: Dali Zeng ([email protected]). 50
† These authors contributed equally to this work. 51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
4
60
61
Abstract 62
The global problem of drought threatens agricultural production and constrains the 63
development of sustainable agricultural practices. In plants, excessive water loss causes 64
drought stress and induces early senescence. In this study, we isolated a rice (Oryza sativa) 65
mutant, designated as early senescence 1 (es1), which exhibits early leaf senescence. The 66
es1-1 leaves undergo water loss at the seedling stage (as reflected by whitening of the leaf 67
margin and wilting) and display early senescence at the three-leaf stage. We used map-based 68
cloning to identify ES1, which encodes a SCAR-like protein 2, a component of the 69
SCAR/WAVE complex involved in actin polymerization and function. The es1-1 mutants 70
exhibited significantly higher stomatal density. This resulted in excessive water loss and 71
accelerated water flow in es1-1, also enhancing the water absorption capacity of the roots and 72
water transport capacity of the stems, as well as promoting in vivo enrichment of metal ions 73
co-transported with water. Expression of ES1 is higher in the leaves and leaf sheaths than in 74
other tissues, consistent with its role in controlling water loss from leaves. GFP-ES1 fusion 75
proteins were ubiquitously distributed in the cytoplasm of plant cells. Collectively, our data 76
suggest that ES1 is important for regulating water loss in rice. 77
78
Key words: ES1; water loss; SCAR; stomatal density 79
80
INTRODUCTION 81
Rice is a major world-wide food crop, but it consumes more water than most crops 82
(Bruce et al., 2015), with water consumption for rice cultivation accounting for 83
approximately 65% of agricultural water usage. Rice provides a staple food for about 3 84
billion people, while using an estimated 24–30% of the world's developed freshwater 85
resources (Bouman et al., 2007). Severe water shortages restrict the expansion of rice 86
production and hinder the irrigation of existing paddy fields (Zhu et al., 2013). One effective 87
way to overcome water shortages is to reduce water loss in rice plants, thus allowing 88
cultivation of this key crop in environments with less water (Nguyen et al., 1997). 89
In plants, the stomata on the leaf surface work as the main channels for discharge of 90
www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
5
water and entry of carbon dioxide, and thus strongly affect physiological processes such as 91
transpiration and photosynthesis. Previous studies showed that mutations in some genes 92
could affect stomatal density or differentiation, such as AtTMM (Yang et al., 1995), 93
AtSCRM2 (Kanaoka et al., 2008), AtSDD1(Von Groll et al., 2002), AtYODA2(Bergmann et 94
al.,2004). Stomata show a regular distribution on rice leaves (Huang et al., 2009) during plant 95
growth and development, various environmental factors affect the density and size of 96
stomata, as well as the chlorophyll contents of rice leaves. For example, rice leaves that 97
develop under water stress show substantial fewer stomata compared with leaves that develop 98
under well-watered conditions (Huang et al., 2009). Changes in stomatal density and 99
morphology affect water loss (Boonrueng et al., 2013). In rice, OsSRO1 (Similar to RCD-100
One) enhances drought tolerance by regulating stomatal closure (You et al., 2013) while the 101
zinc finger protein DST (Drought and Salt Tolerance) functions in drought and salt tolerance 102
by adjusting stomatal aperture (Huang et al., 2009). In Arabidopsis thaliana, overexpression 103
of the Mg-chelatase H subunit in guard cells confers drought tolerance by promoting stomatal 104
closure (Tsuzuki et al., 2013). Thus, stomatal closure and low stomatal density enhance 105
drought tolerance by reducing water loss in plants. 106
The epicuticular wax layer in plants acts as the first barrier to environmental conditions 107
by reducing water loss due to transpiration and preventing plant damage due to excessively 108
strong sunlight (Riederer et al., 2001). Leaf transpiration involves both stomatal and cuticular 109
transpiration. Stomatal conductance controls stomatal transpiration, but the physicochemical 110
properties of the leaf surface mainly control cuticular transpiration. For example, the 111
composition, thickness, and microstructure of the cuticular wax affect water permeability and 112
transport (Buschhaus et al., 2012; Svenningsson, 1988; Xu et al., 1995). OsDWA1 (rice 113
Drought-induced Wax Accumulation 1), OsGL1 (GLOSSY1), and OsWR1 (rice Wax 114
synthesis Regulatory gene 1) affect drought tolerance by regulating deposition or 115
biosynthesis of cuticular wax (Islam et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2012; Zhou et al., 2013; Zhu et 116
al., 2013). 117
Besides, leaf trichomes can also affect water loss (Konrad et al., 2015), and leaf 118
trichomes closely linked with actin cytoskeleton. The involvement of the actin cytoskeleton 119
in controlling directional cell expansion in trichomes has received much attention (Zhang et 120
al., 2005). Generally, genes that affect cytoplasmic organization can be studied by screening 121
leaf trichome mutants (Qiu et al., 2002). In Arabidopsis, a reproducible morphogenetic 122
program directs the polarized development of trichome branches (Le et al., 2006; Mathur et 123
al., 1999; Syzmanski et al., 1999). Some of these genes affect the cytoskeleton and also affect 124
www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
6
the morphology of normal plant cells, especially epidermal cells. For example, mutation of 125
SPIKE1 in Arabidopsis causes epidermal cells to show simple arrangement and 126
morphologies, i.e., all cells dividing along a single axis (Qiu et al., 2002). 127
To study the molecular mechanisms underlying water loss in rice, we isolated and 128
characterized the es1-1 (early senescence 1-1) rice mutant, which showed excessive water 129
loss and early senescence phenotypes. Map-based cloning data showed that ES1 encodes a 130
SCAR-like protein 2, and its Arabidopsis thaliana homolog affects the polymerization of 131
actin. The es1-1 mutants showed obvious changes in leaf trichomes, similar to Arabidopsis. 132
However, few studies have reported a connection between the actin cytoskeleton and water 133
loss in Arabidopsis. Our results demonstrated a critical role of the actin cytoskeleton in 134
regulating water loss in rice. 135
RESULTS 136
Identification and Characterization of Early Senescence Mutants 137
To study the mechanisms of senescence in rice, we screened a large pool of mutants 138
generated in the japonica rice cultivar Nipponbare (NPB) background by mutagenesis using 139
ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS). From this pool, we identified two mutants with an early 140
senescence phenotype. The two mutants showed similar phenotypes under the same growth 141
conditions and F1 hybrid individuals produced by the two parental mutants exhibited 142
phenotypes like the parental line with the weaker phenotype (subsequently named es1-1, see 143
below), indicating that the two mutants are allelic (Supplemental Table 1); therefore, we 144
termed these mutants early senescence 1 (es1-1 and es1-2). Under normal growth conditions, 145
es1-1 plants showed severely retarded development. At the seedling stage, the es1-1 mutants 146
displayed whitish and yellowish leaf tips (Figure 1A), a hallmark of early senescence (Li et 147
al., 2014); this phenotype increased with increasing leaf age, becoming more severe at the 148
heading stage (Figure 1B). Newly developed leaves showed yellowing margins that rolled 149
inwards or formed a spiral and old leaves showed spots with a rusty color and water 150
deficiency phenotypes, including wilting (Figures 1A and 1B). Histochemical analysis 151
showed that concentrations of senescence-related substances, including hydrogen peroxide 152
(H2O2), superoxide radical (O2•-), and malondialdehyde (MDA), were higher in es1-1 leaves 153
than in the wild-type leaves (Figures 1C and 1D), indicating that the mutant does show 154
senescence phenotypes (Moradi et al., 2007). Moreover, we measured the expression of two 155
www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
7
senescence marker genes, Staygreen (Sgr) and Os185, in NPB and es1-1 (Supplemental 156
Figures 1F and 1G). We found that the transcript levels of these two genes were substantially 157
higher in es1-1 than in NPB, suggesting that es1-1 caused senescence (Park et al., 2007; Lee 158
et al., 2001). We also measured plant height, finding that es1-1 plants were much shorter than 159
the wild-type plants from the seedling to the mature stages (Figures 1A and 1B, Supplemental 160
Table2). At the mature stage, es1-1 mutants showed degraded or white panicles with a low 161
seed setting rate (only 2.4%; Figure 1E, Supplemental Table 2), short internodes (Figure 1F, 162
Supplemental Table2), and brown, open glumes (Figure 1G). Scanning transmission electron 163
microscopy showed that es1-1 mutants had disordered thylakoids, compared with the neat 164
and well-ordered thylakoids observed in wild-type plants; moreover, es1-1 mutants had lower 165
chlorophyll contents than wild type NPB. 166
Compared with es1-1, the es1-2 plants had more tillers (Supplemental Figures 1A and 167
1C), higher plants (Supplemental Figures 1A and 1D), and showed a stronger early 168
senescence phenotype in the leaves (Supplemental Figure 1B). In this study, we mainly 169
focused on es1-1 mutants, unless otherwise specified. 170
Map-Based Cloning of ES1 171
To clarify whether es1-1 phenotypes were caused by a single or multiple gene(s) and 172
dominant or recessive genes, we crossed the mutant plants directly and reciprocally with 173
three wild-type cultivars. All the F1 plants showed no symptoms of early senescence. In the 174
F2 segregating populations of these three crosses, normal and early senescent plants showed a 175
typical segregation ratio of 3:1 (Supplemental Table 3). This result suggested that a single 176
recessive nuclear gene controls the early senescence phenotype of es1-1. 177
For cloning ES1, we crossed the mutant es1-1 (japonica) with a typical indica cultivar 178
(NJ6). Plants with the es1-1 phenotype were identified from the F2 generation and used as the 179
initial mapping population. For primary chromosome mapping, we used 164 pairs of simple 180
sequence repeat (SSR) primers distributed on the 12 chromosomes of rice at a distance of 10–181
30 cM from each other to detect differences between es1-1 and NJ6. A significant 182
amplification difference was detected on chromosome 1 using the SSR marker M1, showing 183
linkage with a small population in the F2. The M1 marker was further used to analyze 320 184
mutants in the F2 population, which detected 15 recombinants. Genetic linkage analysis 185
mapped the M1 marker to a distance of 2.3 cM from ES1 (Figure 2A). 186
www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
8
For fine mapping of ES1, the mutation in ES1 must be flanked by two molecular 187
markers. Thus, we designed multiple pairs of primers at positions relatively far from M1 188
(Supplemental Table 4). The marker M6 also showed polymorphisms between es1-1 and NJ6. 189
Screening of the primary mapping population (320 mutants) identified 11 recombinants that 190
differed from those identified using M1 (Figure 2A). Linkage analysis mapped the M6 191
marker to a distance of 1.8 cM from ES1. Next, we used M1 and M6 to screen the entire 192
population (2850 plants), which identified 50 and 39 recombinants, respectively (Figure 2A). 193
To further narrow the ES1 region, we developed a large number of sequence-tagged site 194
(STS) and cleaved amplified polymorphic sequence (CAPS) markers between M3 and M4. 195
Primers C1–C9 showed good polymorphisms between es1-1 and TN1. Thus, we used these 196
primers to analyze the recombinants obtained by preliminary screening and to construct fine 197
genetic and physical maps of ES1 (Figure 2B; Supplemental Table 4). The number of 198
recombinants detected by C1 and C10 decreased to 28 and 35, respectively. Similarly, the 199
number of recombinants screened by C2 and C9 decreased to 10 and 12, respectively, and 200
those detected by C3 and C8 further decreased to three and four, respectively. The 201
recombinants detected by C3 and C8 corresponded to different individual plants. 202
We also designed primers for the region between C3 and C8 to further screen the 203
recombinants. Finally, these new primers detected only one recombinant and thus these 204
markers tightly co-segregate with ES1 (Figure 2B). The physical distance between the end 205
markers C5 and C6 was 13.1 kb, which included two predicted open reading frames. 206
Sequencing analysis detected a unique mutation in LOC-Os01g11040 within the 13.1 kb 207
region in es1-1 compared with the wild-type sequence. This single-base mutation replaced G 208
with A in the first nucleotide of the third intron (nucleotide 2275; Figure 2C). To test whether 209
this mutation alters the normal splicing of the third intron, we generated es1-1 and wild-type 210
genomic cDNAs using reverse transcription. Sequencing showed that the es1-1 cDNA was 62 211
bases longer than the wild-type cDNA (Figure 2D). This increase in length coincided with the 212
length of the third intron, which contains a stop codon that results in the premature 213
termination of protein translation (Figure 2E). Similarly, sequencing analysis showed that the 214
mutation in es1-2 was a single-base substitution (G to A) at nucleotide 4660. This mutation 215
changed the tryptophan (Trp) codon into a stop codon, thus resulting in the premature 216
termination of protein translation (Figures 2E). 217
We then used genetic complementation to verify the identity of ES1. A 10.6-kb fragment 218
containing ES1 (including the upstream 2-kb and downstream 1-kb sequences) was 219
www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
9
introduced into es1-1 and es1-2 mutants, and 52 and 36 transgenic plants, respectively, were 220
recovered. Exogenous ES1 rescued the phenotypes of es1-1 and es1-2 (Figure 2F), and the 221
complementation reversed the mutant phenotype of es1-1. Taken together, these data 222
demonstrate that LOC-Os01g11040 (Os01g0208600) is ES1. 223
ES1 Encodes a SCAR-Like Protein of the Arp2/3-SCAR Pathway 224
We performed a BLAST search to identify ES1 homologs in more than 20 different 225
plant species. ES1 showed high amino acid sequence similarity to proteins in other species 226
such as Oryza brachyantha (85%), Brachypodium distachyon (68%), maize (60%), and 227
Setaria italica (64%) (Figure 3E). ES1 also shares high amino acid sequence similarity to 228
proteins in both monocots and dicots, suggesting that ES1 and its homologs may perform 229
similar functions. Examination of ES1 homologs in Arabidopsis showed that ES1 230
(Os01g0208600) encodes a SCAR-like protein 2; its closest homolog in Arabidopsis forms 231
part of the actin-related 2/3 (ARP2/3) complex, which functions in regulating actin filament 232
polymerization and has been examined in detail in Arabidopsis. ARP2/3 alone is inactive in 233
Arabidopsis. A domain formed by the SCAR-like family proteins, and members of other 234
protein families (e.g., SPA1 and ABI families) are responsible for binding to and activation of 235
the Arp2/3 complex (Zhang et al., 2005). In Arabidopsis, mutation of the gene encoding 236
SCAR-like protein 2 leads to changes in leaf trichomes and stomata (Basu et al., 2005). In 237
our study, we observed substantial changes in leaf trichomes of es1-1, mainly reflected by the 238
serious degradation of the trichome tip (Figures 3A and 3B). The leaves of es1-1 had smooth 239
leaf margins without a jagged pattern (Figure 3A). 240
To examine the possible role of ES1 in regulating actin filaments, we examined the 241
organization of F-actin in the roots of wild type and es1-1 mutants by Alexa Fluor 488-242
phalloidin staining. The actin filaments were well organized in wild type (Figure 3C). The 243
actin filaments in wild-type were complete, orderly arranged, while es1-1 showed irregular 244
arrangement. Moreover, the actin filaments in es1-1 were shorter than that in wild type, as 245
indicated by arrows (Figure 3D), which indicated that ES1 likely functions in the Arp2/3-246
SCAR pathway in rice and that a mutation in ES1 affects the actin cytoskeleton in rice cells 247
(Dyachok et al., 2011). 248
www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
10
Expression of ES1 and Subcellular Localization of ES1 249
To monitor the tissue-specific expression of ES1, we generated an ES1:GUS (β-250
glucuronidase) reporter construct containing the 2.0-kb genomic region upstream of the start 251
codon of ES1. We detected high GUS activity in leaves, leaf sheaths, and root tips, and also 252
detected lower GUS activity in stamens and vascular bundles (Figures 4A–4E). Reverse-253
transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) assays showed that ES1 was 254
ubiquitously expressed in various tissues at the tillering and heading stages, including the 255
roots, culms, leaves, sheaths, and spikelets. We observed the highest levels of ES1 expression 256
in the leaf and leaf sheath (Figure 4F). Consistent with the RT-qPCR data, ES1:GUS 257
expression was higher in rice leaves and leaf sheaths than in other plant tissues. 258
To investigate the subcellular localization of ES1, we constructed a construct to express 259
eGFP-ES1 (35S::eGFP-ES1 DNA) and introduced it into onion and tobacco epidermal cells. 260
Fluorescence signals were detected in both cell types, and the signals surrounded the 261
cytoplasm, nucleus, and cell membrane (Figures 4G, 4H, 4I, and 4J). Consistent results were 262
obtained by examining protoplasts extracted from tobacco leaves after the expression of the 263
fusion protein (Figures 4K and 4L). These results indicated that ES1 was ubiquitously 264
distributed in the cytoplasm of plant cells. 265
ES1 Affects the Density of Leaf Stomata in Rice 266
Scanning electron microscopy of es1-1 leaves showed that these leaves had smoother 267
surfaces than the leaves of wild-type plants. In addition, these leaves showed substantial 268
smaller siliceous protrusions at the seedling stage and substantially more stomata per unit leaf 269
area compared with wild-type leaves. The number of semi-open stomata in es1-1 was also 270
larger than that in wild-type (Figures 5A and 5B). Moreover, the tips of trichomes and the 271
waxy layer were severely degraded on the leaf surface of es1-1 mutants (Figure 5A). 272
Statistical data showed that, regardless of the position, stomatal density was significantly 273
higher in es1-1 than that in the wild-type. While both stomatal conductance and transpiration 274
rate were also detected, they were also significantly higher in es1-1, these data indirectly 275
suggested stomatal density in es1-1 was higher (Figure 5B). The maximum and minimum 276
stomatal apertures were greater in the wild-type compared with es1-1(Figure 5C). At the 277
seedling stage, the transcriptional level of several genes which could affect the increase of 278
www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
11
stomatal density were analyzed by the real-time PCR, including OsTMM, OsSCRM, 279
OsSDD1, OsYODA2 (Du et al., 2014). The expression level of OsTMM, OsSCRM and 280
OsSDD1 were significantly higher in es1-1 than that in the wild-type, and ES1 gene also 281
showed higher expression level in es1-1(Figure 5E). 282
Leaves of wild-type and es1-1 at seedling stage were sprayed with 300 umol / L ABA, 283
after 3 hours, quantitative analysis of OsTMM, OsSCRM, OsSDD1, OsYODA2 was taken. In 284
the wild-type, the expression level of these genes almost didn’t change; but in es1-1, the 285
majority of these genes had shown a significantly declined expression level, this indicated in 286
es1-1 those genes which could affect the increase of stomatal density were sensitive to ABA. 287
We also detected the rate of vitro water loss (RWL) of seedling leaves from the same position 288
of the wild-type and es1-1 before and after ABA treatment. The results showed that, no 289
matter with or without ABA treatment, the vitro RWL value was always higher in es1-1 than 290
that in the wild-type. The vitro RWL value in the wild-type was reduced after ABA 291
treatment, and the value in es1-1 was also reduced after ABA treatment, but it was not so 292
obvious compared with the wild-type (Figure 5D). SEM assay on the leaves of wild-type and 293
es1-1 with ABA treatment showed that nearly all stomata of both wild-type and es1-1 were 294
closed. Moreover, we also examined the expression level of multiple ABA response-related 295
genes (ABA signaling genes) in wild-type and es1-1 before and after ABA treatment (Shang 296
et al., 2010), and discovered that after ABA treatment, OsDREB2A gene was up-regulated, 297
while OsABI4 gene was down-regulated. These results suggest that both wild-type and es1-1 298
were sensitive to ABA (Figure 5E). 299
300
The es1-1 Plants Showed Higher Water Loss Rates than Wild Type 301
In vitro, the rate of water loss of es1-1 was higher than that of NPB at the seedling 302
stage (Figure 6A), as the detached leaves of es1-1 shrunk into a line at 30 min, but the NPB 303
leaves remained nearly normal in width (Figure 6A). To confirm this phenomenon, we also 304
measured water loss per unit of time (g cm-2.10-3) at the tillering stage in vivo and in vitro 305
(Figures 6B and 6C), which gave similar results: the water loss per unit of time in vitro 306
(detached leaves) in different periods was uniformly higher in es1-1 than in NPB (Figure 6B). 307
The water loss per unit of time in vivo was also uniformly higher in es1-1 than in NPB at 4, 8, 308
and 14 days after tillering (Figure 6C). 309
To verify excessive water loss in es1-1, we performed a guttation experiment, where we 310
www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
12
looked for the exudation of drops of xylem sap on the leaf periphery in plants grown at 311
different humidities. Hydroponic seedlings were cultured in light, in an incubator at different 312
humidities, from 30% and 90%, and the es1-1 and wild-type plants were examined for 313
guttation. At the seedling stage (two-leaf), both the wild-type plants and es1-1 were capable 314
of guttation at 30% humidity. However, higher humidity was required for guttation with plant 315
growth. Until the strong seedling stage (two-tiller), guttation was observed in wild-type 316
plants but not in es1-1 (Supplemental Figure 2). This result indicated that water loss occurred 317
more rapidly in es1-1 mutants than in the wild-type plants. 318
319
Water Absorption and Transport Capacity was Increased in es1-1 320
Mutants 321
It is unknown whether excessive water loss through leaves affects water absorption in 322
the root. To address this, we measured root traits in es1-1 and wild-type plants (Figures 7A, 323
7B, 7C, and 7D). The es1-1 plants had smaller primary and total root lengths (Figures 7E and 324
7F) but higher average root diameters, total root volumes, and total numbers of fibrous roots, 325
compared with the wild-type plants (Figures 7G, 7H, 7I, and 7J). As fibrous roots are a major 326
tissue for water adsorption in rice (Smith et al., 2012), an increase in fibrous root number 327
indicated an increase in the water absorption capacity of the roots in es1-1 mutants. 328
329
Examination of cross sections of the culm and primary root from es1-1 and NPB showed 330
that the es1-1 stems had 3–4 additional vascular bundles (Figures 8A, 8B, and 8C) and the 331
es1-1 primary roots had 2 to 3 additional conduits, compared with NPB (Figures 8D, 8E, and 332
8F). Vascular bundles and conduits are necessary for water transport (Kim et al., 2014). 333
Moreover, the water potential values were all higher in es1-1 than that in wild-type in various 334
tissues, including roots, stems, leaves, and sheath, which indicated that the ability to transport 335
water was stronger in es1-1 than in WT (Figure 8G) (Silva et al., 2011). Therefore, our results 336
indicate that es1-1 mutants have an enhanced ability to transport water. 337
338
Excessive Water Loss Causes in Situ Enrichment of Minerals in es1-1 339
In es1-1 mutants, excessive water loss through the leaves enhances the water absorption 340
www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
13
capacity of the roots and the water transportation capacity of the roots and culms. This in turn 341
accelerates water circulation in the plant, thus leading to predicted in situ enrichment of metal 342
ions cotransported with water (Kim et al., 2014). To test this hypothesis in this mutant, we 343
determined the mineral concentrations of different tissues of es1-1 and wild-type plants at the 344
mature stage. Consistent with the hypothesis, the concentrations of all four minerals tested 345
(Cu, Fe, Mn, and Zn) in the examined tissues were much higher in es1-1, especially in the 346
roots and new leaves, than in wild-type plants (Table 1). The manganese (Mn) concentration 347
in es1-1 leaves (719 mg kg-1) was seven times higher than that in wild-type plants (100 mg 348
kg-1). The concentrations of the four minerals were also higher in es1-1 seeds than in NPB 349
(Table 1). These results suggested that mutation in ES1 promoted the accumulation of 350
minerals in plants. The substantial accumulation of metal ions in es1-1 plants was likely due 351
to excessive water loss and higher transpiration pull in the upper part of the plant. 352
DISCUSSION 353
In this study, we characterized es1-1, an early senescence mutant that experienced 354
excessive water loss. Map-based cloning showed that ES1 encodes a SCAR-like protein 2, a 355
component of the SCAR/WAVE complex that is involved in actin polymerization. This 356
suggests that a mutation in ES1 affects polymerization of actin and causes an abnormality in 357
the cytoskeleton that promotes a higher stomatal density (Huang et al., 2000; Xiao et al., 358
2003; Yu et al., 2001; Zhang et al., 2012), thus leading to excessive water loss. 359
Under stress conditions, plants develop a wax layer on the leaf surface or moderately roll 360
their leaves to reduce transpiration, thereby protecting themselves from excessive water loss 361
(Hu et al., 2012; Jäger et al., 2014). Although stomata account for only 1–2% of the leaf area, 362
approximately 90% of water loss occurs through stomata (Buckley et al., 2005). Under 363
drought conditions, rice cultivars that can maintain relatively high water potential and low 364
transpiration rate in their leaves have strong drought resistance (Luo et al., 2001). These 365
drought-resistant cultivars commonly retain water in the plant body by closing their stomata. 366
Small stomatal aperture and large diffusion resistance can jointly reduce water loss due to 367
transpiration, thus avoiding the adverse effects of drought. Grill and Ziegler (1998) proposed 368
that controlling the stomata is the most important way to improve the efficiency of water use 369
in plants. In the present study, scanning electron microscopy showed that the es1-1 mutants 370
had substantially more stomata than wild-type plants. The expression level of OsTMM, 371
OsSCRM and OsSDD1 were significantly higher in es1-1 than that in the wild-type (Figure 372
www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
14
5E), which was closely related to stomatal density. Stomatal density was significantly higher 373
in es1-1 than that in the wild-type. While both stomatal conductance and transpiration were 374
also significantly higher in es1-1 than that in the wild-type (Figure 5B), these data suggested 375
that es1-1 definitely lose water more quickly than wild-type. Nearly all stomata of both wild-376
type and es1-1 were closed after ABA treatment, and the vitro RWL value in the wild-type 377
was reduced after ABA treatment, the value in es1-1 was also reduced after ABA treatment, 378
but it was not so obvious compared with the wild-type (Figure 5D). Moreover, the wax layer 379
on the leaf surface of es1-1 mutants was considerably degraded. So, we thought the excessive 380
water loss in es1-1 mainly due to increased stomatal density, meanwhile the degradation of 381
waxy layer and leaves hair may aggravate the rate of water loss. 382
Excessive water loss in the leaves inevitably depletes water from the body of es1-1 383
plants. Thus, more water needs to be absorbed through the roots to meet the metabolic 384
requirements of es1-1 plants. In this study, we analyzed the roots of es1-1 and found that the 385
total volume of root and the number of fibrous roots increased compared to wild type 386
(Figures 7I and 7J), indicating that the water absorption capacity of the roots was enhanced in 387
es1-1. Cross-sections of the primary root and stems also showed that the number of vascular 388
bundles in the stems increased by four (Figure 8C) and those in the roots increased by two to 389
three in es1-1 compared to the wild-type plants (Figure 8F). Moreover, the water potential 390
values were all higher in es1-1 than in wild-type in various tissues (Figure 8G). These 391
observations confirmed that the water transport capacity of the roots was enhanced in es1-1. 392
All the above changes inevitably accelerate water circulation and cause minerals 393
commonly cotransported with water to accumulate in the various tissues of es1-1 plants. 394
Indeed, in different tissues, the concentrations of four minerals were higher in es1-1 than in 395
NPB (Table 1). For example, the Cu concentration in es1-1 (446.3 mg kg-1) was 18-times 396
higher than in wild-type plants (23.5 mg kg-1), which could cause Cu overload in es1-1 397
plants. Enrichment of low-mobility metal elements (e.g., Cu, Fe, Mn, and Zn) in various 398
tissues of es1-1 may in turn accelerate the onset of senescence. Moreover, the higher 399
concentrations of mineral nutrients in seeds from the es1-1 mutants might produce more-400
nutritious food; however, the accumulation of toxic elements such as arsenic might produce 401
food that could adversely affect human health. 402
In our study, we found that actin filaments were shorter in es1-1, and the continuity was 403
poor compared with wild-type (Figures 3C and 3D). Actin filaments function in many 404
endomembrane processes, such as endocytosis of plasma membrane, vacuole formation, 405
plasma membrane protrusion in crawling cells, and vesicle transport from the Golgi complex 406
www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
15
(Svitkina et al., 1999; Eitzen et al., 2002; Kaksonen et al., 2003; Mathur et al., 2003; Chen et 407
al., 2004). The ARP2/3 complex functions as a key regulator of actin filament nucleation in 408
plants (Zhang et al., 2008). The ARP2/3 is inactive by itself, as actin polymerization requires 409
activation by the SCAR/WAVE complex, formed by proteins of the SCAR family. The 410
SCAR/WAVE complex is highly conserved in plants. A deficiency of the SCAR/WAVE 411
complex often leads to morphological changes in leaf trichomes and epidermal cells. This 412
phenomenon has been reported in several studies in Arabidopsis (Li et al., 2003; Mathur et 413
al., 2003; Saedler et al., 2004) but not in rice. In our study, es1-1 showed evident 414
morphological changes in leaf trichomes (Figures 3A, 3B, and 5C), confirming that the 415
function of the SCAR/WAVE complex is conserved in different species. Additional 416
components of the SCAR/WAVE complex can be identified by screening for mutants that 417
affect the leaf trichomes of the es1-1 mutant. 418
Actin polymerization occurs in the cytoplasm. In the present study, the fluorescent 419
signal of eGFP-ES1 was detected in the cytoplasm and plasma membrane of tobacco and 420
onion epidermal cells, a localization consistent with the predicted function of ES1 in affecting 421
the actin cytoskeleton. After fusing the ES1 promoter with the GUS reporter gene, GUS 422
staining was observed in various tissues, including the roots, root hairs, stems, leaves, leaf 423
sheath, and vascular bundles, which are associated with water absorption, transportation, and 424
loss. The ES1 expression level was relatively high in the leaves and leaf sheaths—the two 425
major tissues involved in water loss. All these results are consistent with the proposed 426
function of ES1. 427
The increased number of stomata would increase water loss and induce drought stress 428
in es1-1 plants. Drought stress affects photosynthetic capacity, respiration, membrane 429
permeability, osmotic adjustment, enzyme activity, and hormone levels in rice leaves, thus 430
reducing leaf area, leaf area index, and dry weight. Drought stress also prevents the 431
accumulation of dry matter and accelerates senescence (Hu et al., 2010; Ding et al., 2014; 432
Sellammal et al., 2014). In the present study, es1-1 plants showed early senescence 433
characterized by yellowish leaf color and wilting of leaf margins at the seedling stage. 434
Transmission electron microscopy showed that the volume percentage of chloroplasts in the 435
es1-1 cells was lower than that in wild-type cells; however, the number of chloroplasts 436
(irregular and fine prolate) was higher in es1-1 cells than in wild-type cells (Figure 1H). This 437
might have caused the decline in chlorophyll content in es1-1, causing the leaves to turn 438
yellowish. In es1-1, the chloroplasts contained disorganized thylakoids (Figure 1H) as 439
www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
16
opposed to the well-organized thylakoids in wild-type plants. The disordered thylakoids may 440
have reduced the capacity to absorb light energy, which in turn would decrease the 441
photosynthetic rate, thus causing early senescence in plant leaves. 442
Early senescence in rice (especially in functional leaves) is extremely unfavorable for 443
rice growth and production because of its serious effects on yield and quality (Zhu et al., 444
2012). Therefore, rice breeders generally avoid lines showing early senescence. Similarly, the 445
stay-green trait in rice also does not improve yield; although the stay-green trait promotes the 446
ability of source tissues to fix carbon, it does not necessarily enhance the contents of sink 447
tissues in plants. For example, a study on a stay-green mutant of rice (sgr[t]) reported that 448
late photosynthesis and yield traits (seed-setting rate and thousand-grain weight) were not 449
enhanced in sgr[t] mutants (Cha et al., 2002). In the present study, the early senescing mutant 450
es1-1 showed other phenotypes such as decreased number of tillers and substantially reduced 451
seed-setting rate. Our data provide new insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying 452
early senescence in plants, which will help genetically improve rice yield. 453
MATERIALS AND METHODS 454
Plant Growth and Sampling 455
The es1-1 and es1-2 mutants were isolated from the japonica variety Nipponbare that 456
was subjected to EMS treatment. After multiple generations of inbreeding, the phenotypes of 457
these two mutants were stably inherited, and homozygous mutant strains were obtained. The 458
homozygous mutant es1-1 was directly and reciprocally crossed with two typical japonica 459
cultivars (Zhonghua 11 and Chunjiang 06) and one typical indica rice cultivar (Nanjing 6) 460
providing a relatively clear genetic background to construct the genetic population. The 461
obtained seeds of the F1 generation were sown and transplanted as individual plants to 462
generate the F2 generation by inbreeding. The numbers of individuals showing wild-type and 463
early senescence phenotypes were counted at the seedling stage. The segregation ratio was 464
calculated using statistical methods. Genetic analysis was performed on es1-1, and recessive 465
individuals were retrieved for preliminary mapping of the mutation. Plant materials were bred 466
in experimental field of the China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou, China. 467
www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
17
Detection of Reactive Oxygen Species and Malondialdehyde 468
H2O2 and O2•- were detected using nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) and diaminobenzidine 469
(DAB), respectively, according to (Li et al., 2010; Wi et al., 2010) with some modifications. 470
Leaves of 3-week-old plants that were grown in growth chambers were incubated in 0.05% 471
NBT (Duchefa) or 0.1% DAB (Sigma) at room temperature in darkness with gentle shaking 472
for 12 hrs. Chlorophyll was cleared by treating with 90% ethanol at 80°C. The concentration 473
of malondialdehyde (MDA) was measured according to the method described by Moradi and 474
Ismail (2007) with minor modifications (Moradi et al., 2007). 475
Determination of Water Potential 476
Ten seeds of NPB and es1-1 were selected, germinated for 3 days, then cultured in an 477
incubator at 28°C for 60 days. The WP4-T Dewpoint PotentiaMeter was preheated for 30 478
min until the temperature remained stable. Various tissues such as leaf, sheath, culm, and root 479
of NPB and es1-1 were harvested from the same position on each plant and cut into short 480
pieces. After making sure the sample temperature was lower than room temperature, the 481
samples were put in the measuring apparatus, which showed the water potential value of the 482
sample. Every sample measurement had six independent repeats, and the weight of the 483
samples was equal. 484
Map-Based Cloning of ES1 485
The mutation in es1-1 was mapped in the F2 population of a cross between es1-1 and the 486
indica variety NJ6. To finely map the ES1 locus, new molecular markers were developed 487
using public databases (Supplemental Table 4). Further, ES1 was sequenced using specific 488
primers (Supplemental Table 4). 489
490
Fluorescence Microscopy of Actin Filaments 491
For F-actin observation, plants were grown in a culture chamber with 16/8 hrs 492
photoperiod at 30°C. Seedling roots were used to observe actin organization. F-actin was 493
stained using the previously described method (Olyslaegers and Verbelen, 1998; Zhang et al., 494
www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
18
2011). Seven-day-old roots were fixed in PEM buffer (100 mM PIPES, 10 mM EGTA, 0.3 M 495
mannitol, 5 mM MgSO4, pH 6.9) with 3% paraformaldehyde for 30 min and washed 3 times 496
with PEM. After washing, roots were incubated in PEM buffer with 0.66 mM Alexa Fluor 497
488-phalloidin (Life Technologies). After overnight incubation at 4°C, samples were washed 498
three times with PEM buffer and then observed in 50% glycerol with a confocal microscope 499
(Olympus FLUOVIEW FV1000). 500
501
Phylogenetic Analyses 502
A BLAST search of the SCAR-like 2 amino acid sequence was performed 503
against the database (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/sss/ncbiblast/). The phylogenetic tree was 504
constructed based on the amino acid sequences. Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic 505
analysis was performed by MEGA6.0 (Tamura et al., 2013). ML analysis of the SCAR-like 2 506
family was based on the amino acid sequences using the Jones-Taylor-Thornton model, 507
which was chosen after model testing. Support for the ML trees was evaluated by 1000 508
bootstrap replicates. 509
510
Plasmid Construction and Plant Transformation 511
The cDNA sequence of ES1 was amplified using the primers cES1-F and cES1-R (Table 512
S3). This cDNA was fused in frame with eGFP in pCambia1300 (http://www.cambia.org) 513
with minor modifications to generate the transient expression vector 35S::eGFP:cES1. The 514
35S::eGFP-cES1 plasmids were transferred into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105 515
by electroporation; the cells of rice ES1, Nicotiana tabacum, and onion were transformed 516
according to a previously described method (Hiei et al., 1994; Lv, 2010). 517
For the molecular complementation assay, a 10.6-kb genomic fragment comprising the 518
ES1 promoter region, coding sequence, and 3′ untranslated region was PCR amplified from 519
the genomic DNA of wild-type plants using pES-F and pES-R primers (Table S3). The PCR 520
amplification product was cloned into pCAMBIA1300 to generate the ES1:ES1 construct. 521
Briefly, the pCambia1300::ES1 vector was first digested with the restriction enzymes PstI 522
and XbaI. Next, the fragment containing ES1 was digested with restriction enzymes Sse83871 523
www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
19
and NheI. All the restriction enzymes used above are isocaudomers. The pCambia1300::ES1 524
plasmids were transformed into A. tumefaciens strain EHA105 by electroporation. The es1-1 525
and es1-2 plants were transformed according to a published method (Hiei et al., 1994). 526
To generate the ES1:GUS fusion construct, a 2.0-kb upstream genomic region of the 527
ES1 start codon was amplified with the primers ES1-gus-F and ES1-gus-R (Table S3). The 528
amplified fragment was linked with the reporter GUS gene and together inserted in the 529
pCambia1305 vector (http://www.cambia.org). 530
GUS Staining 531
Samples (proES1::GUS) were stained with a solution containing 50 mM NaPO4 buffer, 1 532
mM 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-d-glucuronic acid, 0.4 mM K3Fe(CN)6 , 0.4 mM 533
K4Fe(CN)6, and 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100. The samples were then incubated at 37°C in the 534
dark for 10 hrs. Chlorophyll was removed with 70% ethanol for observation. 535
RNA Extraction and RT-qPCR 536
Total RNA was extracted from the roots, culms, leaves, sheaths, and spikelets of wild-537
type and es1-1 plants at the seedling, tillering and heading stages using an RNeasy Plant Mini 538
Kit (Qiagen). Reverse transcription was handled with the ReverTra Ace qPCR-RT Kit 539
(TOYOBO), the primers are described in Supplemental Table 4. RT-qPCR analysis was 540
conducted with the StepOnePlus System (ABI) using THUNDERBIRD qPCR Mix 541
(TOYOBO), reaction procedure was 95°C 30 s; 95°C 5 s, 55°C 10 s, 72°C 15s for 40 cycles. 542
OsActin was used as a control. The 2-ΔΔCt method was used for quantification (Livak et al., 543
2001). 544
Microscopy 545
In different periods, especially at the noon when the sunlight was the strongest (and thus 546
the stomata are likely to be closed), fresh leaf specimens were collected from the same 547
position ( 1/4, 1/2 and 3/4 of leaf blade ) in the mutant es1-1 and the control Nipponbare, 548
from plants that showed consistent growth. The specimens were cut into approximately 1 × 2 549
www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
20
mm pieces and processed as follows for microscopic examination. 550
Dual fixation: The specimens were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde solution, vacuumed in a 551
vacuum apparatus for approximately 20–30 min (which allowed the specimens to be 552
immersed in the fixative as completely as possible), and kept at 4°C overnight. Thereafter, 553
the fixative was discarded, and the specimens were rinsed with 0.1 M phosphate-buffered 554
saline (PBS), pH 7.0. The specimens were rinsed 3–4 times (15 min each). The specimens 555
were then fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide for at least 1 h. The fixative was discarded, and the 556
specimens were rinsed with 0.1 M PBS three times (15 min each) as described above. 557
Dehydration: The specimens were first dehydrated with a gradient of ethanol (50%, 70%, 558
80%, 90%, and 95%; 15 min to 20 min at each gradient), processed in anhydrous ethanol for 559
20 min, and treated in pure acetone for 20 min. 560
After dehydration, the specimens were immersed in a mixture of ethanol and isoamyl 561
acetate esters (volume ratio 1:1) for 30 min and were then treated with pure isoamyl acetate 562
for 1-2 h. The specimens were dried, coated, and examined using a Hitachi TM-1000 563
scanning electron microscope. 564
For transmission electron microscopy of the leaves and cross-sectional examination of 565
the leaves and roots, the specimens were pretreated as described above. After dehydration, 566
the specimens were treated with a mixture of embedding agent and pure acetone at a volume 567
ratio of 1:1 for 1 h, followed by treatment with a mixture of embedding agent and pure 568
acetone at a volume ratio of 3:1 for 3 h and pure embedding agent overnight. The specimens 569
were then embedded in small boxes and heated at 70°C for approximately 9 h. The obtained 570
embedded samples were sliced into 70-90 nm sections using a Reichert ultramicrotome and 571
stained with lead citrate solution and saturated uranyl acetate solution in 50% ethanol for 15 572
min each. The sections were examined and photographed using a Hitachi H-7650 type 573
transmission electron microscope. 574
Determination of Minerals 575
Wild-type and es1-1 plants were cultured in complete hydroponic nutrient solution up 576
to the heading stage. Tissue specimens were taken from the roots, stems, old leaves, leaf 577
sheaths, and new leaves. The weight of fresh specimens was more than 10 g for the different 578
www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
21
tissues. The specimens were oven dried at 80°C for 3 days to achieve a constant weight. After 579
grinding, the dry samples (0.25 g for es1-1 and NPB, respectively) were digested with a 580
mixture of concentrated nitric acid and perchloric acid (volume ratio 1:3). The volume of the 581
digestion solution was adjusted to 25 ml with single-distilled water. The treated samples were 582
then used for elemental analysis. Concentrations of elements were determined using a full-583
spectrum direct reading inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy (IRIS 584
Intrepid II XSP ICP-OES PE-2100; Thermo Electron Co., Ltd, USA; Shao et al., 2008). 585
Detection of the Rate of Water Loss 586
In vitro detection: The same leaf parts were selected from NPB and es1-1 plants at the 587
seedling stage. These leaf parts were left at room temperature and observed and photographed 588
every 10 min to examine their dehydration. At the tillering stage, the same leaf parts of NPB 589
and es1-1 were quickly weighed (W1), and the total area (S) was measured. Moreover, the 590
weights of the leaf blade (W2, W3, and W4) were also measured every 1 h. The formula 591
(W1-W2) S-1 was used to calculate the rate of water loss. Accordingly, the rate of water loss 592
at different time points was obtained. 593
In vivo detection: After accelerating germination, the wild-type and es1-1 seeds were 594
cultured in fine sand and watered twice a day (in the morning and evening). At the 1–2-leaf 595
stage, rice seedlings were washed off and wrapped in a long sponge, then placed in a closed 596
bottle with clean water. At the 3-leaf stage, clean water was replaced by complete nutrient 597
solution. After the seedlings developed new roots, all the bottles were filled with a sufficient 598
volume of nutrient solution, and the level was marked for subsequent measurement. The 599
leaves were weighed on days 1 (W1), 4 (W2), 8 (W3), and 14 (W4). The corresponding leaf 600
areas were also measured (S2, S3, and S4). Water loss per unit of time in 4 days was 601
calculated as (W1 − W2) S2-1. Six plants were used for every time interval measurement (the 602
results are presented as mean values). Analogously, (W1 − W3) S3-1 was the amount of water 603
loss per unit of time in 8 days, and (W1 − W4) S4-1 was the amount of water loss per unit of 604
time in 14 days. 605
www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
22
Measurement of Root Traits 606
Hydroponic experiments were conducted using the wild-type and es1-1 plants. The seeds 607
were soaked for two days, during which time the water was changed once. Next, the seeds 608
were transferred into a germination box to accelerate germination. Three days later, seeds 609
with radicals breaking through the testa were transferred into fine sand for cultivation. After 610
incubation for 7 days, the seedlings were washed carefully to avoid damage to the roots. The 611
plants were transferred into a black bucket containing tap water. After the transition, the 612
plants were supplied with complete nutrient solution. The seedlings entered the two-leaf stage 613
after three days. At the 5-leaf stage, seedlings of the mutant and wild-type plants (10 each) 614
were taken out for root measurements. The hydroponic seedlings were rinsed and placed in a 615
transparent rectangular box containing single-distilled water and loaded onto a scanner 616
(ScanWizard Pro: ScanMarker 1000XL) for transparent scanning. The obtained images were 617
loaded into Win-RHIZO. Pro. V. 2002c for data analysis, and the results were exported to 618
MS Excel 2011 (Microsoft, USA) for analysis. 619
620
www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
23
621 Accession Numbers 622
Sequence data from this article are available at the NBCI website 623
(http:www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) with the accession numbers: LOC_Os01g11040 624
(NP_001172227.1), OB01G1689 (XP_006643892.1), Bradi2g06610(XP_003565325.1), 625
Oryza_sativa_indica (OsI_00845), Setaria italica (Si000056m.g), Hordeum vulgare var. 626
distichum (M0XEC2), Aegilops tauschii (F775_07293), Triticum aestivum (W5CZS7), Zea 627
mays (ZEAMMB73_679274), Triticum urartu (TRIUR3_31093), Musa acuminata subsp. 628
Malaccensis (M0UB73), Medicago truncatula (MTR_8g086300), Theobroma cacao 629
(TCM_029698), Phaseolus vulgaris (PHAVU_002G238500g), Jatropha curcas 630
(JCGZ_21566), Glycine max (I1K3Z5), Populus trichocarpa (POPTR_0004s05600g), 631
Prunus persica (PRUPE_ppa000443mg), Citrus sinensis (CISIN_1g001053mg), Citrus 632
clementina (CICLE_v10014081mg), Eucalyptus grandis (EUGRSUZ_D00489), Solanum 633
lycopersicum (Solyc02g076840.2), Erythranthe guttata (MIMGU_mgv1a000504mg), Vitis 634
vinifera (VIT_10s0003g01270), Ricinus communis (RCOM_0850090), Amborella trichopoda 635
(AMTR_s00021p00061660), Morus notabilis (L484_002198), Arabidopsis lyrata 636
subsp.(Lyrata ARALYDRAFT_903078). 637
638
Supplemental Data 639
Supplemental Table 1. Allelic analysis of es1-1 and es1-2. 640
Supplemental Table 2: Phenotypic data of NPB and es1-1. 641
Supplemental Table 3. Reciprocal cross experiments between es1-1 and three crop strains 642
(ZH11, CJ06, and NJ6). 643
Supplemental Table 4. Primers used for PCR in this study. 644
Supplemental Figure 1. Phenotype of allelic mutants. 645
A, wild-type; bar = 10 cm. B, allelic mutants; bar = 10 cm (left, es1-1; right, es1-2). C, 646
Leaves of allelic mutants; bar = 5 cm (left, es1-1; right, es1-2). D, Difference in tiller number 647
between es1-1 and es1-2. E, Difference of plant height between es1-1 and es1-2. F-G, 648
Expression level of SGR and esl85 between NPB and es1-1. The results are given as means of 649
three independent assays, and error bars indicate SD. *, ** significant at the level of 5% and 650
1%, respectively. 651
Supplemental Figure 2. Comparison of guttation between wild-type and es1-1 plants. NPB 652
leaf showing guttation drops at the point of emergence (adaxial side). 653
www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
24
654
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 655
We sincerely thank Prof.Jianru Zuo (Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, 656
Chinese Academy of Sciences) for sharing unpublished data. This work was supported by 657
grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31201183, 31221004, 658
31171531, 31171520, 91435105) and the State Key Basic Research Program 659
(2013CBA01403), the Ministry of Agriculture of China for transgenic research 660
(No.2013ZX08009003-001), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2014M561108). 661
662
LITERATURE CITED 663
664
Basu D, Le J, El-Essal SE, Huang S , Zhang C, Mallery EL, Koliantz G, Staiger CJ, 665
Szymanski DB (2005) DISTORTED3/SCAR2 is a putative Arabidopsis WAVE complex 666
subunit that activates the Arp2/3 complex and is required for epidermal morphogenesis. 667
Plant Cell 17: 502-524 668
Boonrueng N, Anuntalabhochai S, Jampeetong A (2013) Morphological and anatomical 669
assessment of KDML 105 (Oryza sativa L. spp. indica) and its mutants induced by low-670
energy ion beam. Rice Sci 20(3): 213-219 671
Bouman B, Humphreys E, Tuong T, Barker R (2007) Rice and water. Adv Agron 92:187-672
237 673
Bruce A, Merle M, Maria A, Rufus L, L.Lanier N, Eliete F, Chris V (2014) Reducing 674
greenhouse gas emissions, water use, and grain arsenic levels in rice systems. Global 675
change biol 21:407-417 676
Buckley TN (2005) The control of stomata by water balance. New Phytol 168:275-292 677
Buschhaus C, Jetter R (2012) Composition and physiological function of the wax layers 678
coating Arabidopsis leaves: β-Amyrin negatively affects the intracuticular water barrier. 679
Plant Physiol 160: 1120-1129 680
Cha K-W, Lee Y-J, Koh H-J, Lee B-M, Nam Y-W, Paek N-C (2002) Isolation, 681
characterization, and mapping of the stay green mutant in rice. Theor Appl Genet 104: 682
526-532 683
Chen J, Lacomis L, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Stamnes M (2004) Cytosol-684
derived proteins are sufficient for Arp2/3 recruitment and ARF/coatomer-dependent actin 685
polymerization on Golgi membranes. FEBS Lett 566: 281–286 686
www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
25
Ding L, Li Y, Li Y, Shen Q, Guo S (2014) Effects of drought stress on photosynthesis and 687
water status of rice leaves. Chin J Rice Sci 28: 65-70 (in Chinese with English abstract) 688
Du H, ChangY, Huang F, Xiong L (2014) GID1 modulates stomatal response and 689
submergence tolerance involving abscisic acid and gibberellic acid signaling in rice. J 690
Integr Plant Biol doi: 10.1111/jipb.12313 691
Dyachok J, Zhu L, Liao F, He J, Huq E, Blancaflor E (2011) SCAR mediates light-692
induced root elongation in Arabidopsis through photoreceptors and proteasomes. Plant 693
Cell 23: 3610-3626 694
Eitzen G, Wang L, Thorngren N, Wickner W (2002) Remodeling of organelle-bound actin 695
is required for yeast vacuole fusion. J Cell Biol 158: 669–679 696
Jäger K, Fábián A, Eitel G, Szabó L, Deák C, Barnabás B, Papp I (2014) A morpho-697
physiological approach differentiates bread wheat cultivars of contrasting tolerance under 698
cyclic water stress. Plant Physiol 171: 1256-1266 699
Grill E, Ziegler H (1998) A plant’s dilemma. Science 282, 252 –253. 700
Hiei Y, Ohta S, Komari T, Kumashiro T (1994) Efficient transformation of rice (Oryza 701
sativa L.) mediated by Agrobacterium and sequence analysis of the boundaries of the T-702
DNA. Plant J 6: 271-282 703
Hu L, Wang Z, Huang B (2010) Diffusion limitations and metabolic factors associated with 704
inhibition and recovery of photosynthesis from drought stress in a C3 perennial grass 705
species. Physiol Plant 139: 93-106 706
Huang R, Wang X, Lou C (2000) Cytoskeletal inhibitors suppress the stomatal opening of 707
Vicia faba L. Induced by fusicoccin and IAA. Plant Sci 156:65-71 708
Huang X, Chao D, Gao J, Zhu M, Shi M, Lin H (2009) A previously unknown zinc finger 709
protein, DST, regulates drought and salt tolerance in rice via stomatal aperture control. 710
Genes Dev 23: 1805-1817 711
Islam MA, Du H, Ning J, Ye H, Xiong L (2009) Characterization of Glossy1-homologous 712
genes in rice involved in leaf wax accumulation and drought resistance. Plant Mol Biol 713
70: 443-456 714
Kaksonen M, Sun Y, Drubin DG (2003) A pathway for association of receptors, adaptors, 715
and actin during endocytic internalization. Cell 115: 475–487 716
Kanaoka M, Pillitteri L, Fujii H, Yoshida Y, Bogenschutz N, Takabayashi J, Zhu J, 717
Torii K (2008) SCREAM/ICE1 and SCREAM2 specify three cell-state transitional steps 718
www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
26
leading to Arabidopsis stomatal differentiation. Plant Cell 20: 1775-1785 719
Kim H, Park J, Hwang (2014) Investigating water transport through the xylem network in 720
vascular plants. J Exp Bot 65:1895-1904 721
Konrad W, Burkhardt J, Ebner M, Roth-Nebelsick R (2015) Leaf pubescence as a 722
possibility to increase water use efficiency by promoting condensation. Ecohydrol 8:480-723
492 724
Le J, Mallery EL, Zhang C, Brankle S, Szymanski DB (2006) Arabidopsis 725
BRICK1/HSPC300 is an essential WAVE-Complex subunit that selectively stabilizes the 726
Arp2/3 activator SCAR2. Curr Biol 16: 895-901 727
Lee R, Wang C, Huang L, Chen S (2001) Leaf senescence in rice plants: cloning and 728
characterization of senescence up-regulated genes. J Exp Bot 52: 1117-1121 729
Li J, Pandeya D, Nath K, Zulfugarov IS, Yoo S-C, Zhang H, Yoo J-H, Cho S-H., Koh 730
H-J., Kim D-S, Seo HS, Kang B-C, Lee C-H, Paek N-C (2010) ZEBRA-NECROSIS, a 731
thylakoid-bound protein, is critical for the photoprotection of developing chloroplasts 732
during early leaf development. Plant J 62: 713-725 733
Li S, Blanchoin L, Yang Z, Lord EM (2003) The putative Arabidopsis Arp2/3 complex 734
controls leaf cell morphogenesis. Plant Physiol 132: 2034–2044 735
Li Z, Zhang Y, Liu L, Liu Q, Bi Z, Yu N, Cheng S, Cao L (2014) Fine mapping of the 736
lesion mimic and early senescence 1(lmes1) in rice (Oryza sativa). Plant Physiol Biochem 737
80: 300-307 738
Livak K, Schmittgen T (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time 739
quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCt method. Methods 25: 402-408. 740
Luo L, Zhang Q (2001) The status and strategy on drought resistance of rice (Oryza sativa 741
L.) Chin J Rice Sci 15: 209-214 (in Chinese with English abstract) 742
Lv F (2010) Optimization for Agrobacterium Tumefaciens-mediated transformation system 743
for exogenous genes of tobacco. J Anhui Agri Sci 38: 10065-10066 (in Chinese with 744
English abstract) 745
Mathur J, Spielhofer P, Kost B, Chua N-H (1999) The actin cytoskeleton is required to 746
elaborate and maintain spatial patterning during trichome cell morphogenesis in 747
Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 126: 5559–5568 748
Mathur J, Mathur N, Kernebeck B, Hülskamp M (2003) Mutations in actin-related 749
www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
27
proteins 2 and 3 affect cell shape development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 15: 1632–1645 750
Moradi F, Iamail A.(2007)Responses of photosynthesis, chlorophyII fluorescence and 751
ROS-scavenging systems to salt stress during seedling and reproductive stages in rice. 752
Ann Bot 99:1161-1173 753
Nguyen HT, Babu RC, Blum A (1997) Breeding for drought resistance in rice: physiology 754
and molecular genetics considerations. Crop Sci 37: 1426-1434 755
Park S, Yu J, Park J, Li J, Yoo S, Lee N, Lee S, Jeong S, Seo H, Koh H, Jeon J, Park Y, 756
Paek N (2007) The senescence-induced staygreen protein regulates chlorophyII 757
degradation. Plant Cell 19: 1649-1664 758
Qiu J-L, Jilk R, Marks MD, Szymanski DB (2002) The Arabidopsis SPIKE1 gene is 759
required for normal cell shape control and tissue development. Plant Cell 14: 101-118 760
Riederer M, Schreiber (2001) Protecting against water loss: analysis of the barrier 761
properties of plant cuticles. J Exp Bot 52: 2023-2032 762
Saedler R, Mathur N, Srinivas BP, Kernebeck B, Hülskamp M, Mathur J (2004) Actin 763
control over microtubules suggested by DISTORTED2 encoding the Arabidopsis ARPC2 764
subunit homolog. Plant Cell Physiol 45: 813–822 765
Sellammal R, Robin S, Raveendran M (2014) Association and heritability studies for 766
drought resistance under varied moisture stress regimes in backcross inbred population of 767
rice. Rice Sci 21: 150-161. 768
Shang Y, Yan L, Liu Z, Cao Z, Mei C, Xin Q, Wu F, Wang X, Du S, Jiang T, Zhang X, 769
Zhao R, Sun H, Liu R, Yu Y, Zhang D (2010) The Mg-chelatase H subunit of 770
Arabidopsis antagonizes a group of WRKY transcription repressors to relieve ABA-771
responsive genes of inhibition. Plant Cell 22: 1909-1935 772
Shao G, Chen M, Wang D, Xu C, Mou R, Cao Z, Zhang X (2008) Iron manure regulation 773
of cadmium accumulation in rice. Chin Sci Bull (C): Life Sci 38: 180-187 774
Silva D, Favreau R, Auzmendi I, Dejong T(2011) Linking water stress effects on carbon 775
partitioning by introducing a xylem circuit into L-PEACH. Ann Bot 108:1135-1145 776
Smith S, Smet I (2012) Root system architecture: insights from Arabidopsis and cereal 777
crops. Phil.Trans.R.Soc.B 367:1441-1452 778
Svenningsson M (1988) Epi- and intracuticular lipids and cuticular transpiration rates of 779
primary leaves of eight barley (Hordeum vulgare) cultivars. Plant Physiol 73: 512-517 780
Svitkina TM, Borisy GG (1999) Arp2/3 complex and actin depolymerizing factor/cofilin in 781
www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
28
dendritic organization and treadmilling of actin filament array in lamellipodia. J Cell Biol 782
145: 1009–1026 783
Szymanski DB, Marks MD, Wick SM (1999) Organized F-Actin is essential for normal 784
trichome morphogenesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 11: 2331–2347 785
Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA6:Molecular 786
evolutionary genetics analysis version6.0. Mol Bio Evol 30:2725-2729 787
Tsuzuki T, Takahashi K, Tomiyama M, Inoue S, Kinoshita T (2013) Overexpression of 788
the Mg-chelatase H subunit in guard cells confers drought tolerance via promotion of 789
stomatal closure in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front Plant Sci 4: 440 790
Von G, Berger D, Altmann T (2002) The subtilisin-like serine protease SDD1 mediates 791
cell-to-cell signaling during Arabidopsis stomatal development. Plant Cell 14: 1527-1539 792
Wang Y, Wan L, Zhang L, Zhang Z, Zhang H, Quan R, Zhou S, Huang R (2012) An 793
ethylene response factor OsWR1 responsive to drought stress transcriptionally activates 794
wax synthesis related genes and increases wax production in rice. Plant Mol Biol 78: 275-795
288 796
Wi SJ, Jang SJ, Park KY (2010) Inhibition of biphasic ethylene production enhances 797
tolerance to abiotic stress by reducing the accumulation of reactive oxygen species in 798
Nicotiana tabacum. Mol Cells 30: 37-49 799
Xiao Y, Chen Y, Wang X (2003) Filaments skeleton in guard cell. Chin Bull Bot 20: 489-800
494 801
Xu H, Gauthier L, Gossenlin A (1995) Stomatal and cuticular transpiration of greenhouse 802
tomato plants in response to high solution electrical conductivity and low soil water 803
content. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 120: 417-422 804
Yang M, Sack F (1995) The too many mouths and four lips mutations affect stomatal 805
production in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 7: 2227-2239 806
You J, Zong W, Li X, Ning J, Hu H, Li X, Xiao J, Xiong L (2013) The SNAC1-targeted 807
gene OsSRO1c modulates stomatal closure and oxidative stress tolerance by regulating 808
hydrogen peroxide in rice. J Exp Bot 64: 569-583 809
Yu R, Huang R, Wang X, Yuan M (2001) Microtubule dynamics are involved in stomatal 810
movement of Vicia faba L. Protoplasma 216:113-118 811
Zhang C, Mallery EL, Schlueter J, Huang S, Fan Y, Brankle S, Staiger CJ, Szymanski 812
DB (2008) Arabidopsis SCARs function interchangeably to meet actin-related protein 2/3 813
activation thresholds during morphogenesis. Plant Cell 20: 995-1011 814
www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
29
Zhang Q, Lin F, Mao T, Nie J, Yan M, Yuan M, Zhang W (2012) Phosphatidic Acid 815
Regulates Microtubule Organization by Interacting with MAP65-1 in Response to Salt 816
Stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 24:4555-4576 817
Zhang X, Dyachok J, Krishnakumar S, Smith LG, Oppenheimer DG (2005) 818
IRREGULAR TRICHOME BRANCH1 in Arabidopsis encodes a plant homolog of the 819
actin-related protein2/3 complex activator Scar/WAVE that regulates actin and 820
microtubule organization. Plant Cell 17: 2314-2326 821
Zhou L, Ni E, Yang J, Zhou H, Liang H, Li J, Jiang D, Wang Z, Liu Z, Zhuang C 822
(2013) Rice OsGL1-6 is involved in leaf cuticular wax accumulation and drought 823
resistance. PLoS One 8: e65139 1-12 824
Zhu LF, Yu SM, Jin QY (2012) Effects of aerated irrigation on leaf senescence at late 825
growth stage and grain yield of rice. Rice Sci 19(1): 44-48. 826
Zhu X, Xiong L (2013) Putative megaenzyme DWA1 plays essential roles in drought 827
resistance by regulating stress-induced wax deposition in rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 828
110: 17790-17795 829
830
831
832
www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
30
833
Table 1. Comparison of mineral contents between wild-type and es1-1 plants. 834
Cu(mg kg-1) Fe(mg kg-1) Mn(mg kg-1) Zn(mg kg-1)
root NPB 23.5±3.83 3757.7±122.55 17.75±1.75 28.49±1.12 es1-1 446.3±18.52** 18155.3±326.27** 58.97±3.88** 91.26±5.88**
culm NPB 8.61±1.21 35.52±3.7 32.19±1.3 28.75±1.81 es1-1 20.18±4.7** 46.05±3.54** 147.99±10.06** 85.83±6.35**
shealth NPB 6.59±1.15 136.2±8.59 92.331±5.9 42.52±3.4 es1-1 16.88±2.43** 240.2±14.65** 582.2±13.22** 65.36±7.92**
old leaf
NPB 9.32±2.1 228.8±15.1 100.01±7.1 29.89±2.56 es1-1 18.27±3.88** 358.3±21.94** 719.05±34.8** 64.04±7.5**
young leaf
NPB 8.02±1.16 102.1±6.78 27.51±3.32 30.48±3.44 es1-1 17.07±2.91** 223.1±11.4** 175.81±12.24** 62.22±4.28**
seed NPB 4.26±0.64 4.05±0.35 31.62±2.86 24.23±2.6 es1-1 5.91±0.72** 6.98±1.06** 50.36±4.1** 53.13±8.12**
The results are given as mean ± SD of three independent assays. 835
*, ** significant at the level of 5% and 1%, respectively 836
837
Figures and Legends 838
Table 1. Comparison of mineral contents between wild-type and es1-1 plants. 839
Figure 1. Phenotypes of wild-type and es1-1 plants. 840
A, Plants in the seedling stage. Wild-type (NPB, left) and es1-1 (right) plants; bar = 3 cm. B, 841
Plants at the heading stage. Wild-type (NPB, left) and es1-1 (right) plants; bar = 10 cm. C, 842
Nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) staining (up: NPB, left; es1-1, right); Diaminobenzidine (DAB) 843
staining (down: NPB, left; es1-1, right). D, Malondialdehyde (MDA) contents at the seedling 844
stage. (NPB, left; es1-1, right). E, Panicle rachis (NPB, left; es1-1, right); bar = 5 cm. F, Leaf 845
at different parts (NPB, left; es1-1, right); from left to right, internode length of the first to 846
top, internode length of the second to top, internode length of third to top, and internode 847
length of fourth to top; bar = 3 cm. G, Grain size (NPB, up; es1-1, down); bar = 1 mm. H, 848
Chloroplasts, observed by transmission electron microscopy; (NPB, up; es1-1, down); bar = 849
0.5 μm. 850
851
Figure 2. Map-based cloning of ES1, and phenotype of es1-1 complementation transgenic 852
line. 853
www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
31
A, Location of es1-1 on rice chromosome 1. B, Coarse linkage map of es1-1. C, es1-1 gene 854
structure. D, Reverse transcription of es1-1. E, Schematic diagram of es1-1 and mutated 855
proteins encoded by es1-1 and es1-2. F, Phenotype of complementation transgenic lines; es1-856
1 plant (left), Wild-type (NPB, middle) and transgenic line (right), bar = 10 cm. 857
858
Figure 3. ES1 is a SCAR homolog. 859
A, Leaf margin (left, NPB; right, es1-1). B, Trichome phenotype (macro hairs; upper, NPB; 860
down, es1-1). C, D, F-actin organization was visualized with Alexa Fluor 488-phalloidin in 861
root cells of wild type and es1. Over 40 roots were used in this analysis. Bar =5 μm (C, NPB; 862
D, es1-1). Arrows indicate the continuity of F-actin. E, Phylogenetic tree of SCAR-like 2 863
protein in several species. 864
865
Figure 4. Expression of ES1 and subcellular localization of ES1. 866
A–E, GUS staining of leaf (A), leaf sheath (B), fibrous root (C), stamen (D), and culm 867
vascular bundles (E). F, Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of ES1 expression in different 868
tissues at the tillering stage (T) and heading (H) stage. The results are given as means of three 869
independent assays, and each error bar represents the percent standard deviation of the mean. 870
G–L, GFP fluorescence visualized by confocal microscopy. Transient expression of eGFP 871
(G) and eGFP–ES1 cDNA (H) in epidermal cells of onion. 35S::eGFP::ES1 cDNA and 872
35S::GFP were transiently expressed in onion epidermal cells. Transient expression of eGFP 873
in epidermal cells (I) and protoplasts (K) and expression of eGFP–ES1 in epidermal cells (J) 874
and protoplasts (L) of Nicotiana benthamiana leaves. 35S::eGFP::ES1 and 35S::GFP were 875
transiently expressed in N. benthamiana leaves. 876
877
Figure 5. Observation of stomata between NPB and es1-1. 878
A, Stomata density of the wild-type (left) and es1-1 (right) leaves. Bar = 30 µm. the red 879
triangle indicate the position of stomata. B, Statistical analysis of stomatal parameters, such 880
as stomata density, partially-open stomata, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate. C, 881
Morphological characteristics (left) and maximum opening size (right) of stomata between 882
wild-type (up) and es1-1 (down) plants. Bar = 5 µm D, Comparison of water loss rate 883
between wild-type and es1-1 plants with and without 300um ABA treatment at the 3-leaf-884
stage. E, qRT-PCR analysis of stomata density related genes (OsTMM, OsSCRM, OsSDD1, 885
OsYODA2), ES1, and some ABA response-related genes (OsDREB1A, OsDREB2A, 886
OsMYB2,OsABI4, OsABI5, OsABF4) in WT and es1-1 leaves before and after 300um ABA 887
www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
32
treatment at the 3-leaf-stage. The values were normalized to the Actin1 gene. ** indicates 888
significance (t-test) at the P<0.01. Different letters indicate significant difference at the 1% 889
level (Duncan multiple range test) 890
891
892
Figure 6. Observation of water loss rate between wild-type and es1-1 plants. 893
A, Water loss rate of detached leaves at the seedling stage (left, NPB; right, es1-1). B, Water 894
loss rate of detached leaves at the tillering stage. C, Water loss per unit of time of living 895
leaves between NPB and es1-1 plants at the tillering stage. Error bars indicate SD (n = 15). 896
Asterisks indicate the significance of differences between NPB and es1-1 plants, as 897
determined by t-test. *0.01 ≤ P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. 898
899
Figure 7. Phenotype comparison of the roots between NPB and es1-1 plants. 900
A, Root scanning of NPB plants; bar = 5 cm. B, Root scanning of es1-1 plants; bar = 5 cm. 901
C, Enlarged figure of roots in NPB plants; bar = 5 cm. D, Enlarged figure of root in es1-1 902
plants; bar = 5 cm. E–J, Statistical analysis of the main root length (E), total root length (F), 903
total area of the root (G), average diameter of the root (H), total volume of the root (I), total 904
number of fibrous roots (J) of NPB and es1-1 plants. The results are given as means of three 905
independent assays, and error bars indicate SD. Asterisks indicate the significance of 906
differences between NPB and es1-1 plants, as determined by t-test. *0.01 ≤ P < 0.05, **P < 907
0.01. 908
909
Figure 8. Number of vascular bundles and conduits in wild-type and es1-1 plants. 910
A, Number of vascular bundles in NPB plants. B, Number of vascular bundles in es1-1 911
plants. C, Comparison of the number of vascular bundles between NPB and es1-1 plants. D, 912
Number of conduits in NPB plants. E, Number of conduits in es1-1 plants. F, Comparison of 913
the number of conduits between NPB and es1-1 plants. G, Detection of the water potential 914
value in WT and es1-1. Relative water potential value in different tissues at seedling stage of 915
WT and es1-1 analyzed by WP4-T Dewpoint PotentiaMeter. The results are given as means 916
of three independent assays, and error bars indicate SD. *, ** significant at the level of 5% 917
and 1%, respectively. 918 919
www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
1
Figure 1. Phenotypes of wild-type and es1-1 plants.
A, Plants in the seedling stage. Wild-type (NPB, left) and es1-1 (right) plants; bar = 3 cm. B,
Plants at the heading stage. Wild-type (NPB, left) and es1-1 (right) plants; bar = 10 cm. C,
Nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) staining (up: NPB, left; es1-1, right); Diaminobenzidine (DAB)
staining (down: NPB, left; es1-1, right). D, Malondialdehyde (MDA) contents at the seedling
stage. (NPB, left; es1-1, right). E, Panicle rachis (NPB, left; es1-1, right); bar = 5 cm. F, Leaf
at different parts (NPB, left; es1-1, right); from left to right, internode length of the first to top,
internode length of the second to top, internode length of third to top, and internode length of
fourth to top; bar = 3 cm. G, Grain size (NPB, up; es1-1, down); bar = 1 mm. H, Chloroplasts,
observed by transmission electron microscopy; (NPB, up; es1-1, down); bar = 0.5 μm.
www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
1
Figure 2. Map-based cloning of ES1, and phenotype of es1-1 complementation transgenic
line.
A, Location of es1-1 on rice chromosome 1. B, Coarse linkage map of es1-1. C, es1-1 gene
structure. D, Reverse transcription of es1-1. E, Schematic diagram of es1-1 and mutated
proteins encoded by es1-1 and es1-2. F, Phenotype of complementation transgenic lines;
es1-1 plant (left), Wild-type (NPB, middle) and transgenic line (right), bar = 10 cm.
www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
1
Figure 3. ES1 is a SCAR homolog.
A, Leaf margin (left, NPB; right, es1-1). B, Trichome phenotype (macro hairs; upper, NPB;
down, es1-1). C, D, F-actin organization was visualized with Alexa Fluor 488-phalloidin in
root cells of wild type and es1. Over 40 roots were used in this analysis. Bar =5 μm (C, NPB;
D, es1-1). Arrows indicate the continuity of F-actin. E, Phylogenetic tree of SCAR-like 2
protein in several species.
www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
1
Figure 4. Expression of ES1 and subcellular localization of ES1.
A–E, GUS staining of leaf (A), leaf sheath (B), fibrous root (C), stamen (D), and culm
vascular bundles (E). F, Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of ES1 expression in different
tissues at the tillering stage (T) and heading stage (H). The results are given as means of three
independent assays, and each error bar represents the percent standard deviation of the mean.
G–L, GFP fluorescence visualized by confocal microscopy. Transient expression of eGFP (G)
and eGFP–ES1 cDNA (H) in epidermal cells of onion. 35S::eGFP::ES1 cDNA and
35S::GFP were transiently expressed in onion epidermal cells. Transient expression of eGFP
in epidermal cells (I) and protoplasts (K) and expression of eGFP–ES1 in epidermal cells (J)
and protoplasts (L) of Nicotiana benthamiana leaves. 35S::eGFP::ES1 and 35S::GFP were
www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
2
transiently expressed in N. benthamiana leaves.
www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
1
Figure 5. Observation of stomata between NPB and es1-1.
A, Stomata density of the wild-type (left) and es1-1 (right) leaves. Bar = 30 µm. the red
triangle indicate the position of stomata. B, Statistical analysis of stomatal parameters, such
as stomata density, partially-open stomata, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate. C,
Morphological characteristics (left) and maximum opening size (right) of stomata between
wild-type (up) and es1-1 (down) plants. Bar = 5 µm D, Comparison of water loss rate
between wild-type and es1-1 plants with and without 300um ABA treatment at the
3-leaf-stage. E, qRT-PCR analysis of stomata density related genes (OsTMM, OsSCRM,
OsSDD1, OsYODA2) and ES1, and some ABA response-related genes (OsDREB1A,
OsDREB2A, OsMYB2,OsABI4, OsABI5, OsABF4) in WT and es1-1 leaves before and after
300um ABA treatment at the 3-leaf-stage. The values were normalized to the Actin1 gene. **
www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
2
indicates significance (t-test) at the P<0.01. Different letters indicate significant difference at
the 1% level (Duncan multiple range test)
www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
1
Figure 6. Observation of water loss rate between wild-type and es1-1 plants.
A, Water loss rate of detached leaves at the seedling stage (left, NPB; right, es1-1). B, Water
loss rate of detached leaves at the tillering stage. C, Water loss per unit of time of living
leaves between NPB and es1-1 plants at the tillering stage. Error bars indicate SD (n = 15).
Asterisks indicate the significance of differences between NPB and es1-1 plants, as
determined by t-test. *0.01 ≤ P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.
www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
1
Figure 7. Phenotype comparison of the roots between NPB and es1-1 plants.
A, Root scanning of NPB plants; bar = 5 cm. B, Root scanning of es1-1 plants; bar = 5 cm.
C, Enlarged figure of roots in NPB plants; bar = 5 cm. D, Enlarged figure of root in es1-1
plants; bar = 5 cm. E–J, Statistical analysis of the main root length (E), total root length (F),
total area of the root (G), average diameter of the root (H), total volume of the root (I), total
number of fibrous roots (J) of NPB and es1-1 plants. The results are given as means of three
independent assays, and error bars indicate SD. Asterisks indicate the significance of
differences between NPB and es1-1 plants, as determined by t-test. *0.01 ≤ P < 0.05, **P <
0.01.
www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
1
Figure 8. Number of vascular bundles and conduits in wild-type and es1-1 plants.
A, Number of vascular bundles in NPB plants. B, Number of vascular bundles in es1-1 plants.
C, Comparison of the number of vascular bundles between NPB and es1-1 plants. D, Number
of conduits in NPB plants. E, Number of conduits in es1-1 plants. F, Comparison of the
number of conduits between NPB and es1-1 plants. G, Detection of the water potential value
in WT and es1-1. Relative water potential value in different tissues at seedling stage of WT
and es1-1 analyzed by WP4-T Dewpoint PotentiaMeter. The results are given as means of
three independent assays, and error bars indicate SD. *, ** significant at the level of 5% and
1%, respectively.
www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
1
Table 1. Comparison of mineral contents between wild-type and es1-1 plants. Cu(mg kg-1) Fe(mg kg-1) Mn(mg kg-1) Zn(mg kg-1)
root NPB 23.5±3.83 3757.7±122.55 17.75±1.75 28.49±1.12 es1-1 446.3±18.52** 18155.3±326.27** 58.97±3.88** 91.26±5.88**
culm NPB 8.61±1.21 35.52±3.7 32.19±1.3 28.75±1.81 es1-1 20.18±4.7** 46.05±3.54** 147.99±10.06** 85.83±6.35**
shealth NPB 6.59±1.15 136.2±8.59 92.331±5.9 42.52±3.4 es1-1 16.88±2.43** 240.2±14.65** 582.2±13.22** 65.36±7.92**
old leaf
NPB 9.32±2.1 228.8±15.1 100.01±7.1 29.89±2.56 es1-1 18.27±3.88** 358.3±21.94** 719.05±34.8** 64.04±7.5**
young leaf
NPB 8.02±1.16 102.1±6.78 27.51±3.32 30.48±3.44 es1-1 17.07±2.91** 223.1±11.4** 175.81±12.24** 62.22±4.28**
seed NPB 4.26±0.64 4.05±0.35 31.62±2.86 24.23±2.6 es1-1 5.91±0.72** 6.98±1.06** 50.36±4.1** 53.13±8.12**
The results are given as mean ± SD of three independent assays.
*, ** significant at the level of 5% and 1%, respectively
www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Parsed CitationsBasu D, Le J, El-Essal SE, Huang S , Zhang C, Mallery EL, Koliantz G, Staiger CJ, Szymanski DB (2005) DISTORTED3/SCAR2 is aputative Arabidopsis WAVE complex subunit that activates the Arp2/3 complex and is required for epidermal morphogenesis. PlantCell 17: 502-524
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Boonrueng N, Anuntalabhochai S, Jampeetong A (2013) Morphological and anatomical assessment of KDML 105 (Oryza sativa L.spp. indica) and its mutants induced by low-energy ion beam. Rice Sci 20(3): 213-219
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Bouman B, Humphreys E, Tuong T, Barker R (2007) Rice and water. Adv Agron 92:187-237Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Bruce A, Merle M, Maria A, Rufus L, L.Lanier N, Eliete F, Chris V (2014) Reducing greenhouse gas emissions, water use, and grainarsenic levels in rice systems. Global change biol 21:407-417
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Buckley TN (2005) The control of stomata by water balance. New Phytol 168:275-292Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Buschhaus C, Jetter R (2012) Composition and physiological function of the wax layers coating Arabidopsis leaves: ß-Amyrinnegatively affects the intracuticular water barrier. Plant Physiol 160: 1120-1129
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cha K-W, Lee Y-J, Koh H-J, Lee B-M, Nam Y-W, Paek N-C (2002) Isolation, characterization, and mapping of the stay green mutantin rice. Theor Appl Genet 104: 526-532
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Chen J, Lacomis L, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Stamnes M (2004) Cytosol-derived proteins are sufficient for Arp2/3recruitment and ARF/coatomer-dependent actin polymerization on Golgi membranes. FEBS Lett 566: 281-286
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ding L, Li Y, Li Y, Shen Q, Guo S (2014) Effects of drought stress on photosynthesis and water status of rice leaves. Chin J RiceSci 28: 65-70 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Du H, ChangY, Huang F, Xiong L (2014) GID1 modulates stomatal response and submergence tolerance involving abscisic acidand gibberellic acid signaling in rice. J Integr Plant Biol doi: 10.1111/jipb.12313
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Dyachok J, Zhu L, Liao F, He J, Huq E, Blancaflor E (2011) SCAR mediates light-induced root elongation in Arabidopsis throughphotoreceptors and proteasomes. Plant Cell 23: 3610-3626
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Eitzen G, Wang L, Thorngren N, Wickner W (2002) Remodeling of organelle-bound actin is required for yeast vacuole fusion. J CellBiol 158: 669-679
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jäger K, Fábián A, Eitel G, Szabó L, Deák C, Barnabás B, Papp I (2014) A morpho-physiological approach differentiates breadwheat cultivars of contrasting tolerance under cyclic water stress. Plant Physiol 171: 1256-1266
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Grill E, Ziegler H (1998) A plant's dilemma. Science 282, 252 -253. www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hiei Y, Ohta S, Komari T, Kumashiro T (1994) Efficient transformation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) mediated by Agrobacterium andsequence analysis of the boundaries of the T-DNA. Plant J 6: 271-282
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hu L, Wang Z, Huang B (2010) Diffusion limitations and metabolic factors associated with inhibition and recovery of photosynthesisfrom drought stress in a C3 perennial grass species. Physiol Plant 139: 93-106
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Huang R, Wang X, Lou C (2000) Cytoskeletal inhibitors suppress the stomatal opening of Vicia faba L. Induced by fusicoccin andIAA. Plant Sci 156:65-71
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Huang X, Chao D, Gao J, Zhu M, Shi M, Lin H (2009) A previously unknown zinc finger protein, DST, regulates drought and salttolerance in rice via stomatal aperture control. Genes Dev 23: 1805-1817
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Islam MA, Du H, Ning J, Ye H, Xiong L (2009) Characterization of Glossy1-homologous genes in rice involved in leaf waxaccumulation and drought resistance. Plant Mol Biol 70: 443-456
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kaksonen M, Sun Y, Drubin DG (2003) A pathway for association of receptors, adaptors, and actin during endocytic internalization.Cell 115: 475-487
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kanaoka M, Pillitteri L, Fujii H, Yoshida Y, Bogenschutz N, Takabayashi J, Zhu J, Torii K (2008) SCREAM/ICE1 and SCREAM2specify three cell-state transitional steps leading to Arabidopsis stomatal differentiation. Plant Cell 20: 1775-1785
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim H, Park J, Hwang (2014) Investigating water transport through the xylem network in vascular plants. J Exp Bot 65:1895-1904Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Konrad W, Burkhardt J, Ebner M, Roth-Nebelsick R (2015) Leaf pubescence as a possibility to increase water use efficiency bypromoting condensation. Ecohydrol 8:480-492
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Le J, Mallery EL, Zhang C, Brankle S, Szymanski DB (2006) Arabidopsis BRICK1/HSPC300 is an essential WAVE-Complex subunitthat selectively stabilizes the Arp2/3 activator SCAR2. Curr Biol 16: 895-901
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee R, Wang C, Huang L, Chen S (2001) Leaf senescence in rice plants: cloning and characterization of senescence up-regulatedgenes. J Exp Bot 52: 1117-1121
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J, Pandeya D, Nath K, Zulfugarov IS, Yoo S-C, Zhang H, Yoo J-H, Cho S-H., Koh H-J., Kim D-S, Seo HS, Kang B-C, Lee C-H, PaekN-C (2010) ZEBRA-NECROSIS, a thylakoid-bound protein, is critical for the photoprotection of developing chloroplasts duringearly leaf development. Plant J 62: 713-725
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li S, Blanchoin L, Yang Z, Lord EM (2003) The putative Arabidopsis Arp2/3 complex controls leaf cell morphogenesis. Plant Physiol132: 2034-2044
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from
Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Li Z, Zhang Y, Liu L, Liu Q, Bi Z, Yu N, Cheng S, Cao L (2014) Fine mapping of the lesion mimic and early senescence 1(lmes1) inrice (Oryza sativa). Plant Physiol Biochem 80: 300-307
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Livak K, Schmittgen T (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-??Ct method.Methods 25: 402-408.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Luo L, Zhang Q (2001) The status and strategy on drought resistance of rice (Oryza sativa L.) Chin J Rice Sci 15: 209-214 (inChinese with English abstract)
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lv F (2010) Optimization for Agrobacterium Tumefaciens-mediated transformation system for exogenous genes of tobacco. JAnhui Agri Sci 38: 10065-10066 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mathur J, Spielhofer P, Kost B, Chua N-H (1999) The actin cytoskeleton is required to elaborate and maintain spatial patterningduring trichome cell morphogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 126: 5559-5568
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mathur J, Mathur N, Kernebeck B, Hülskamp M (2003) Mutations in actin-related proteins 2 and 3 affect cell shape development inArabidopsis. Plant Cell 15: 1632-1645
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moradi F, Iamail A.(2007)Responses of photosynthesis, chlorophyII fluorescence and ROS-scavenging systems to salt stressduring seedling and reproductive stages in rice. Ann Bot 99:1161-1173
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Nguyen HT, Babu RC, Blum A (1997) Breeding for drought resistance in rice: physiology and molecular genetics considerations.Crop Sci 37: 1426-1434
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Park S, Yu J, Park J, Li J, Yoo S, Lee N, Lee S, Jeong S, Seo H, Koh H, Jeon J, Park Y, Paek N (2007) The senescence-inducedstaygreen protein regulates chlorophyII degradation. Plant Cell 19: 1649-1664
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Qiu J-L, Jilk R, Marks MD, Szymanski DB (2002) The Arabidopsis SPIKE1 gene is required for normal cell shape control and tissuedevelopment. Plant Cell 14: 101-118
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Riederer M, Schreiber (2001) Protecting against water loss: analysis of the barrier properties of plant cuticles. J Exp Bot 52: 2023-2032
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Saedler R, Mathur N, Srinivas BP, Kernebeck B, Hülskamp M, Mathur J (2004) Actin control over microtubules suggested byDISTORTED2 encoding the Arabidopsis ARPC2 subunit homolog. Plant Cell Physiol 45: 813-822
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sellammal R, Robin S, Raveendran M (2014) Association and heritability studies for drought resistance under varied moisturestress regimes in backcross inbred population of rice. Rice Sci 21: 150-161.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shang Y, Yan L, Liu Z, Cao Z, Mei C, Xin Q, Wu F, Wang X, Du S, Jiang T, Zhang X, Zhao R, Sun H, Liu R, Yu Y, Zhang D (2010) TheMg-chelatase H subunit of Arabidopsis antagonizes a group of WRKY transcription repressors to relieve ABA-responsive genes www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from
Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
of inhibition. Plant Cell 22: 1909-1935Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shao G, Chen M, Wang D, Xu C, Mou R, Cao Z, Zhang X (2008) Iron manure regulation of cadmium accumulation in rice. Chin SciBull (C): Life Sci 38: 180-187
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Silva D, Favreau R, Auzmendi I, Dejong T(2011) Linking water stress effects on carbon partitioning by introducing a xylem circuitinto L-PEACH. Ann Bot 108:1135-1145
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith S, Smet I (2012) Root system architecture: insights from Arabidopsis and cereal crops. Phil.Trans.R.Soc.B 367:1441-1452Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Svenningsson M (1988) Epi- and intracuticular lipids and cuticular transpiration rates of primary leaves of eight barley (Hordeumvulgare) cultivars. Plant Physiol 73: 512-517
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Svitkina TM, Borisy GG (1999) Arp2/3 complex and actin depolymerizing factor/cofilin in dendritic organization and treadmilling ofactin filament array in lamellipodia. J Cell Biol 145: 1009-1026
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Szymanski DB, Marks MD, Wick SM (1999) Organized F-Actin is essential for normal trichome morphogenesis in Arabidopsis. PlantCell 11: 2331-2347
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA6:Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version6.0. Mol BioEvol 30:2725-2729
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Tsuzuki T, Takahashi K, Tomiyama M, Inoue S, Kinoshita T (2013) Overexpression of the Mg-chelatase H subunit in guard cellsconfers drought tolerance via promotion of stomatal closure in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front Plant Sci 4: 440
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Von G, Berger D, Altmann T (2002) The subtilisin-like serine protease SDD1 mediates cell-to-cell signaling during Arabidopsisstomatal development. Plant Cell 14: 1527-1539
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y, Wan L, Zhang L, Zhang Z, Zhang H, Quan R, Zhou S, Huang R (2012) An ethylene response factor OsWR1 responsive todrought stress transcriptionally activates wax synthesis related genes and increases wax production in rice. Plant Mol Biol 78:275-288
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wi SJ, Jang SJ, Park KY (2010) Inhibition of biphasic ethylene production enhances tolerance to abiotic stress by reducing theaccumulation of reactive oxygen species in Nicotiana tabacum. Mol Cells 30: 37-49
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Xiao Y, Chen Y, Wang X (2003) Filaments skeleton in guard cell. Chin Bull Bot 20: 489-494Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Xu H, Gauthier L, Gossenlin A (1995) Stomatal and cuticular transpiration of greenhouse tomato plants in response to highsolution electrical conductivity and low soil water content. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 120: 417-422
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from
Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Yang M, Sack F (1995) The too many mouths and four lips mutations affect stomatal production in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 7: 2227-2239
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
You J, Zong W, Li X, Ning J, Hu H, Li X, Xiao J, Xiong L (2013) The SNAC1-targeted gene OsSRO1c modulates stomatal closure andoxidative stress tolerance by regulating hydrogen peroxide in rice. J Exp Bot 64: 569-583
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu R, Huang R, Wang X, Yuan M (2001) Microtubule dynamics are involved in stomatal movement of Vicia faba L. Protoplasma216:113-118
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang C, Mallery EL, Schlueter J, Huang S, Fan Y, Brankle S, Staiger CJ, Szymanski DB (2008) Arabidopsis SCARs functioninterchangeably to meet actin-related protein 2/3 activation thresholds during morphogenesis. Plant Cell 20: 995-1011
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Q, Lin F, Mao T, Nie J, Yan M, Yuan M, Zhang W (2012) Phosphatidic Acid Regulates Microtubule Organization by Interactingwith MAP65-1 in Response to Salt Stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 24:4555-4576
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang X, Dyachok J, Krishnakumar S, Smith LG, Oppenheimer DG (2005) IRREGULAR TRICHOME BRANCH1 in Arabidopsisencodes a plant homolog of the actin-related protein2/3 complex activator Scar/WAVE that regulates actin and microtubuleorganization. Plant Cell 17: 2314-2326
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou L, Ni E, Yang J, Zhou H, Liang H, Li J, Jiang D, Wang Z, Liu Z, Zhuang C (2013) Rice OsGL1-6 is involved in leaf cuticular waxaccumulation and drought resistance. PLoS One 8: e65139 1-12
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhu LF, Yu SM, Jin QY (2012) Effects of aerated irrigation on leaf senescence at late growth stage and grain yield of rice. Rice Sci19(1): 44-48.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhu X, Xiong L (2013) Putative megaenzyme DWA1 plays essential roles in drought resistance by regulating stress-induced waxdeposition in rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110: 17790-17795
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
www.plantphysiol.orgon September 4, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.