1-s2.0-s092540051100236x-main

Upload: mridula-rishav-bansal

Post on 14-Apr-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/27/2019 1-s2.0-S092540051100236X-main

    1/7

    http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_1/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2011.03.040mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://www.elsevier.com/locate/snbhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09254005http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_1/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2011.03.040
  • 7/27/2019 1-s2.0-S092540051100236X-main

    2/7

    2 D.W.H. Fam et al. / Sensors and Actuators B 157 (2011) 17

    Table 1

    Various platforms for detection of chemical and biomolecules.

    Transducer platforms LOD Specificity Portability Commercialization

    efforts

    PSA DNA NOx CO DMMP

    Bulk acoustic wave ng/ml [17] fM [18] ppb [19] N.A. ppb [20] Receptor dependant Yes Successful [21]

    Surface acoustic wave fg/ml [22] nM [23] ppb [24] ppm [25] Sub ppm [26] Receptor dependant Yes On going [27]

    Mass spectrometry N.A. N.A. ppb [28] N.A. ppb [29] Highly specific Limited Successful [30]

    Opto-chemical sub n g/ml [31]

  • 7/27/2019 1-s2.0-S092540051100236X-main

    3/7

    D.W.H. Fam et al. / Sensors and Actuators B 157 (2011) 17 3

    Fig. 1. Trend of patents filed over the last decade [27].

    in length. They can essentially be thought of as a layer of graphite

    rolled up into a cylinder [47] and depending on the arrangement,

    they could either be single walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) ormulti-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs). SWCNT comprises one

    single layer which is favorable for the effective functionalization

    leading to high specificity to analytes while MWCNTs have many

    layers (approximately 50) [47].

    Ever since the discovery of CNTs, key milestones for sensor

    development have been reached. CNTs have a huge potential as

    sensors due to its high surface area to volume ratio that allows

    for high sensitivity,high thermal stabilitythat makes it viable to be

    deployed in most environmentsand yetthey canbe modified easily

    to imbue selectivity. There are many different types of CNT-based

    electronic sensors including ionization sensors, capacitors, resis-

    tors and transistors. In a review by Gruner, CNT based platforms

    were citedas biocompatiblesensors because of the similarityin size

    with analytes such as cells, proteins and even DNA [48]. Further-more, the electrostatic and electron transfer phenomena occurring

    on thetransducer surface as a consequence of thechemicaladsorp-

    tion or the biological recognition processes induces shifts in the

    sensor response that is readily detectable by the electronic device.

    Thus, there is a huge potential in monitoring these processes using

    CNT based electronic transducers.

    3.2. Morphology

    There are two different methods, to date, capable of fabricat-

    ing these CNT devices; the first being the dispersion of CNT on

    pre-patterned substrates and the second methodology is to syn-

    thesize CNT directly on the substrates. The latter is considered to

    be themost promising route in terms of outputand reproducibility.Efforts have been taken in controlling the growth morphology to

    improve the device performance. The initial growth of CNTs using

    chemical vapor deposition (CVD) was uncontrolled and resulted

    in a random bush-like network [49]. However, in recent years it

    has become apparent that the device performance could be signifi-

    cantlyimproved bycontrollingthe morphology of CNT. Rogerset al.

    demonstrated this by adopting a large-scale synthesis methodol-

    ogy to generate aligned nanotube architecture [50] on a ST (stable

    temperature) cut quartz wafer via CVD using patterned iron cat-

    alyst and methane as the feedstock for growth. The synthesis of

    aligned tubes improved the device performance in terms of a

    reduced device resistanceand improved signal to noiseratio, which

    ultimately lead to an increased sensitivity [51]. This formed the

    impetus for the synthesis and fabrication of devices with differ-

    ent morphologies for different applications. In another work by

    the Rogers group, crossbar devices, random network devices and

    high-density aligned nanotube devices were fabricated by combin-ing CVD growth on ST cut quartz with a two-step transfer process

    using poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) stamping. This gave a rela-

    tively good control over the CNT network morphology and opened

    an avenue for controlling CNT device characteristics.

    Although these methodologies proved useful in controlling the

    morphologies of CNTs, there are still concerns regarding the extent

    of surface area enlargement and morphological control, which are

    critical factors determining the performance of the devices. This

    led to a focus of research on single-CNT devices, as it would elim-

    inate the inter-tube resistance associated with random network

    devices. One of the significant contributions to the development of

    single-CNT devices was based on dielectrophoresis (DEP) to fabri-

    cate large-scaled (several millions per square meter), devices with

    electrodes bridged by a single nanotube [52]. Although the controlover the CNT morphology has increased, there are unfortunately

    substantial differences in performance between the batches; hence

    it is still a challenge to produce sensors with reproducible device

    characteristics. Therefore, there is a need to improve the synthesis

    protocol to accurately control the characteristics of each individ-

    ual nanotube including its contact resistances with the electrode

    materials.

    3.3. Controlled synthesis

    There are generally three techniques used for producing CNTs,

    namely, carbon arc-discharge technique [53,54], laser-ablation

    technique [55] and growth by either (CVD) [56,57] or other meth-

    ods [58]. Iijima was the first toobserve fine threads (MWCNT) in anelectron microscope image of a sample prepared by arc-discharge

    technique [46]. The arc-discharge technique was initially used for

    the production of fullerenes and is a relatively simple method for

    producing CNTs. This method involves passing a direct current

    between two carbon rods, which are biased to create an arc dis-

    charge at high temperature. This high temperature arc discharge

    would then melt and vaporize one of the carbon rods and the vapor

    would be collected as thread-like deposits on the other rod. The

    threads were very thin and long tubes of pure carbon. However,

    there is a lack of control in this method of synthesis as it produces

    soot and other forms of carbon apart from CNTs and therefore,

    chemical refinement is necessary to obtain the pure CNTs. In 1996,

    bundles of aligned SWCNTs were produced by the laser ablation

    technique [55]. This method of producing CNTs uses a pre-heated

  • 7/27/2019 1-s2.0-S092540051100236X-main

    4/7

    4 D.W.H. Fam et al. / Sensors and Actuators B 157 (2011) 17

    (1200 C) horizontal tube under a controlled pressure using a flow

    of inert gas with a target inside. This target consists of a composite,

    which is a mixture of graphite and metal catalysts such as Co or Ni.

    A laser is then introduced onto the target and this causes vaporiza-

    tion to occur. The plume from the vaporization is then collected at

    the cooler downstream end of the horizontal tube that is outside

    the heating zone forming the CNTs. However, this method of syn-

    thesis also produces soot and other carbon compounds apart from

    CNTs. Following this, Jose-Yacaman et al., producing MWCNTs by

    catalytically growing them using CVD [56]. MWCNTswere first dis-

    covered in the buildup on the cathode of the carbon arc that was

    used in a He environment to produce fullerenes such as C60. The

    outer diameter of MWCNTs varies between 2 and 20nm typically

    and the inner diameter is about 13 nm. The interlayer distance is

    similar to the one layer of graphite (0.30.4nm). SWCNT, however,

    have a smaller inner diameter of about 1.21.4 nm [54,58,59].

    Studies have shown that the chirality of the carbon nanotube

    plays an important role in determining the electronic structure

    of the nanotubes [60,61]. Although not much is known quantita-

    tively about the effects of the chirality, diameter and length of the

    nanotubes on the gas sensing properties of the CNTs, these physi-

    cal properties will affect the electronic properties of the CNTs, for

    instance, modulation of the workfunction thus changing its capa-

    bility for sensing. The chirality of the nanotube is the direction ofroll of the sheet of graphene to form a helical nanotube with the

    helix direction being defined by the Hamada vectors (n,m). Calcu-

    lations also have been done to show that the chiral armchair (n,n)

    tubes display a metallic behavior whereas all(n,m) tubes, withnm

    an integral multiple of 3 could be a small-gap semiconductor or

    semimetallic tube [61]. The tubes which do not fall within these

    categories should be semiconducting with a band gap roughly pro-

    portional to the reciprocal of the tube radius [62]. This was found

    to be qualitatively true for tubes with a large diameter where the

    sp interaction is negligible [63,64].

    Therefore, to obtain CNTs with reproducible electronic proper-

    ties, the synthesis and sorting steps of CNTs must be controlled.

    For example, considerable efforts have been devoted to sort the

    chirality and nanotube diameter in an effort to control its elec-tronic properties and several methodologies have been proposed

    including dielectrophoresis [65] or using DNA [66]. However, one

    of the most poignant strategies involved structure-discriminating

    surfactants for the separation of nanotubes (in powdered form) by

    their diameters, band gaps and electronic types (semiconducting

    or metallic) [67]. This methodology for production of pure (semi-

    conducting or metallic) solutions introduced by NanoIntegris Inc.

    constitutes a tool for the up-scale production of nanotubes. How-

    ever, complete refinement in separation of the different chiralities

    has yet to be achieved in this process [67]. Furthermore, as these

    nanotubes are wrapped with surfactants their sensing capabilities

    might be impeded. Accordingly, there is still a need to develop

    CVD based growth protocols in order to obtain the CNT layers of

    consistent thickness, required length, diameter and chirality forconsistent device fabrication.

    3.4. Fabrication of sensor devices

    CNT sensor device fabrication essentially integrates the CNT

    morphology obtained via the chirality, diameter and length sep-

    aration using controlled synthesis techniques with a supporting

    substrate and electrode interconnections in a transistor (Fig. 2) or

    resistor configuration.

    The ability to sense lies in the nature of the interaction

    between the sensitive material and the analyte; whether the ana-

    lyte molecules bind specifically to the sensitive material and hence

    change its intrinsic properties, electronic or mechanical. Due to the

    difficultyin optimization of such a device, commercialization is still

    Fig. 2. Schematic of CNT transistor device.

    elusive. However, one notable contribution to commercialization

    could be found in the works of Gruner and Star et al. [38,42,48,68].

    In their works they have successfully commercialized sensors to

    detect troponin, nitric oxide (NO) and various industrial gases. This

    was accomplished using assays of CNT transistors arranged in an

    array format. These CNT transistors are based on random network

    architectures that display relatively large tube-to-tube variations.

    However, in a network configuration, the difference is averaged

    and the device performance is defined by the mean properties ofthe CNT architecture. This would mean that the only difference

    between devices would be due to the density variations of the nan-

    otubes. Despite the apparent ease in fabrication there has not been

    a significant increase in number of sensors produced for different

    analytes. This might be due to the difficulty in achieving nanotubes

    that are uniformly functionalized and decorated with recognition

    molecules.

    In the recent years, sensors research has become more materi-

    als oriented and the emphasis has been on advanced functional

    nanomaterials that serve as specific sensing layers. These novel

    materials include organic and polymer complexes [16,6984] and

    different oxides of Sn, Zn and Ba [8592], amongst others. A recent

    work by our group demonstrates an electronic sensor based on Ag

    nanoparticles of mono-distributed size (4 nm) which are uniformlydecorated onto SWCNT for the purpose of selective and real-time

    detection of hydrogen sulfide in gaseous form (H2S) [93]. To date,

    much work has been done to improve the selectivity of CNT sen-

    sors and it could be observed that customizable CNT based sensors

    decorated with suitable selective receptors may become accessible

    on the market in the near future.

    3.5. Commercialization efforts

    Although the achievements in CNT based chemical, toxic and

    biosensors are remarkable, substantial research efforts are still

    needed to make commercialization possible. Over the recent years,

    much of the emphasis is being laid on controlling homogeneity of

    nanotube devices and monitoring their interaction with analytes.Though seemingly straight forward, the underlying sensing mech-

    anism of nanotube-based sensors is multifaceted and continues to

    be actively researched and debated. Interaction between various

    analytes and the CNT network may also be complicated for gen-

    eralization. Moreover, during real time sensing, various molecules

    other than the analyte of interest may also be physically adsorbed

    on to the CNTs thereby introducing non-specific binding (NSB).

    There have been some attempts to minimize NSB via substrate

    passivation using blocking agents that does not interfere with the

    molecular recognition event nor contribute to a sensor response.

    Studies have also reportedon theuse oflipidbilayers andliposomes

    that functionsas a bio-interface to achieve reliable sensing of trans-

    membrane and signaling phenomena [94]. These are particularly

    attractive systems to work with as they suppress NSB.

  • 7/27/2019 1-s2.0-S092540051100236X-main

    5/7

  • 7/27/2019 1-s2.0-S092540051100236X-main

    6/7

    http://www.freepatentsonline.com/y2010/0213954.htmlhttp://www.frost.com/prod/servlet/market-insight-top.pag%3Fdocid=104185353http://www.freepatentsonline.com./7598653.html
  • 7/27/2019 1-s2.0-S092540051100236X-main

    7/7

    http://www.nanointegris.com/en/semiconductinghttp://www.nanointegris.com/en/semiconducting