1-s2.0-s1352231003010677-main.pdf

Upload: marcelo-de-cicco

Post on 02-Jun-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/11/2019 1-s2.0-S1352231003010677-main.pdf

    1/2

    Atmospheric Environment 38 (2004) 12311232

    New Directions: The role of bioaerosols in atmospheric

    chemistry and physics

    Bioaerosols, a group of organic aerosols ranging from

    B10 nm to 100 mm, are airborne particles or large

    molecules that are either alive, carry living organisms

    or are released from living organisms (e.g., bacteria,

    fungi, virus, pollen, cell debris, and biofilms;Fig. 1). The

    presence of various types of bioaerosols in indoor air, in

    the troposphere and even in the stratosphere has long

    been established (e.g., Gidlen, 1948, Biological Reviews23, 109126). Although most research on bioaerosols

    has focused on issues related to health hazards, there is a

    substantial body of work in progress on the importance

    of bioaerosols as (a) ice nuclei (IN) and (b) cloud

    condensation nuclei (CCN), and implicating them in the

    alteration of cloud coverage and hence the global

    climate. In this communication, in addition to their IN

    and CCN capability, we would like to briefly discuss the

    potential role of bioaerosols (c) in altering the chemistry

    of the atmosphere via microbiological degradation, (d)

    in modifying the chemical composition of other organic

    compounds upon collision or contact, and hence

    inducing changes in the IN or CCN ability of organics

    in atmosphere, and (e) in driving the chemistry (includ-

    ing photochemistry) at environmental interfaces such as

    air/snow interface.

    It was during the late 1950s (Soulage, 1957, Ann.

    Geophys. 13, 103134) that bioaerosols were initially

    identified within ice nuclei. Soon after, they were

    recognized as active IN at near 0C (e.g., TIN(Pseudomonas syringae bacteria) =2C). Within the

    atmosphere bioaerosols can be dead, dormant or

    actively reproducing (Fuzzi et al., 1997, Atmospheric

    Environment 31(2), 287290; Sattler et al., 2001,

    Geophysical Research Letters 28(2), 239242). See-mingly, some airborne taxa are quite resilient against

    harsh atmospheric conditions such as UV radiation and

    low H2O concentration. Clouds and fogs can attenuate

    some of these environmental stressors and provide a

    medium for growth. Although the observed mass of

    bioaerosols is minute compared to other aerosols in

    atmosphere, their density (e.g.,B103104 bacteria/m3) is

    approximately the same order of magnitude as that of

    ice nuclei, hinting to the potential significance of

    bioaerosols as effective IN. Several types of biological

    organisms (e.g., fungi, bacteria, and algae) and their

    debris have been identified as effective CCN. Note that

    the measured number density of microorganism in cloud

    water appear to be a few orders of magnitude lower than

    the average number of cloud droplet (e.g.;B1500 bacteria ml1 in contrast to typical cloud droplet

    density ofB2 108 ml1). This has led some researchers

    to conclude that bacteria are not an important source

    for cloud nuclei. A caveat should be noted that since

    physical processes rendering bacteria (or other types of

    bioaerosols) effective CCN have yet to be understood,

    the role of bioareosols in general, and bacteria in

    particular, in CCN formation, deserves further studies.

    Recently, we observed evidence for chemical reactions

    induced by bioaerosols. We discovered that several

    atmospherically measured dicarboxylic acids (DCA),

    one of the predominant groups of organic aerosols, can

    efficiently be transformed by airborne bacteria and fungi

    (Ariya et al., 2002, Geophysical Research Letter 29(22),

    20772081). Isotopic studies indicated that microbiolo-

    gical entities can transform and use DCA as nutrients.

    Several observed products were relatively benign (e.g.,

    butanoic acid), and several were toxicants or pathogens

    (e.g., kojic acid). Identified volatile products indicate

    that newly deposited DCA can be recycled back to the

    atmosphere via microbiological processes. Our addi-

    tional unpublished data indicate that DCA are not the

    only chemicals that can undergo microbiological degra-

    dation. Several other dominant atmospherically mea-

    sured organic functional groups can be transformed viabioaerosols. We also measured, isolated, and identified

    over 38 airborne taxa. We carried out kinetic experi-

    ments to determine the degradation rates of model

    organics in presence of each type of bioaerosol, along

    with products. We observed a wide range of variation in

    degradation lifetimes depending on the given taxum, as

    well as factors like pH and temperature. Besides the

    microbiological degradation, bioaerosols can alter the

    chemical composition of atmospheric organic com-

    pounds while they are in contact with them, through

    processes such as cell lysis, and desorption. Once the

    chemical composition of organics along with particle

    ARTICLE IN PRESS

    $Something to say? Comments on this article, or suggestions

    for other topics, are welcome. Please contact: new.directions@

    uea.ac.uk, or go to www.uea.ac.uk/Be044/apex/newdir2.html

    for further details.

    1352-2310/$- see front matterr 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.12.006

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://www.uea.ac.uk/~e044/apex/newdir2.htmlhttp://www.uea.ac.uk/~e044/apex/newdir2.htmlhttp://www.uea.ac.uk/~e044/apex/newdir2.htmlhttp://www.uea.ac.uk/~e044/apex/newdir2.htmlmailto:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 8/11/2019 1-s2.0-S1352231003010677-main.pdf

    2/2

    size and density are changed, their CCN capability will

    also be affected. Note that the lifetime of organic

    aerosols in the atmosphere can vary from days to weeks,

    and that several types of airborne taxa are attached to

    other aerosols such as dust or sea salt. Hence, the

    interactions between organics and bioaerosols (which are

    also organic) are likely. Interestingly, we observed that

    organic compounds can also be transformed in snow by

    microbiological processes (at the snowair interface, taxa

    were dominantly airborne), while producing several

    condensed and volatile compounds. Snow can therefore

    be a source for the atmosphere of biologically produced

    volatile compounds. On speculative ground, the presence

    of photosynthetic organisms may contribute to the

    photochemical reactions in snowpack.

    Current knowledge regarding the physics and chem-

    istry of bioaerosols is not very advanced. Definitely,

    bioaerosol chemistry is very complex and at its early

    stages of evolution. There are more questions than

    answers, namely (a) what is the contribution of airborne

    taxa on transformation of inorganic compounds (or

    pollutants such as heavy metals), in atmosphere or at

    environmental interfaces? (b) How does the chemical

    heterogeneity of bioaerosols influence their ability to actas CCN or IN? (c) Can microbiological degradation

    occur as aerosols are suspended, or are surfaces always

    required? (d) What factors dictate the relative impor-

    tance of chemistry driven by contact vs. microbiological

    degradation (such as temperature, pH, humidity, irra-

    diation)? (e) What are the roles of biofilms, viruses and

    other airborne taxa? (f) What types of chemical

    feedbacks, microbiological activities at air/snow/water

    interface, supply to the atmosphere? There are a few

    major challenges ahead including accurate and selective

    measurement of various forms of bioaerosols. Most

    available techniques provide information on cultur-

    able taxa, which include only a small fraction of the

    total bioaerosols. There have been promising advance-

    ments in techniques to measure bioaerosols in recent

    years, such as femtosecond adaptive spectroscopy for

    coherent antistoke Raman spectroscopy or time-of-flight

    mass spectrometry. However, methods capable of

    accurate measurements of a wide range of bioaerosols

    are yet to be developed. Moreover, further fundamental

    laboratory chemical-biological research is required to

    provide an understanding of the kinetics and mechanism

    for chemical transformation including nature of sur-

    faces, environmental conditions, enzymatic and non-

    enzymatic transformations. Clearly, we also foresee

    some need for modeling studies that will ultimately

    evaluate whether bioaerosols significantly contribute to

    the chemistry and physics of atmosphere, or not!

    Parisa A. Ariya1

    Departments of Chemistry, and Atmospheric and Oceanic

    Sciences, McGill University, 801 Sherbrooke Street West,

    Montreal, PQ, Que., Canada

    E-mail address: [email protected]

    Marc Amyot2

    Department of Biological Sciences, University of Montreal,

    90 Vincent DIndy, D-223, Montreal, PQ, Que.,

    Canada H3A 2K6 H2 V 2S9

    ARTICLE IN PRESS

    Fig. 1. Simplified schematic of bioaerosols cycling in the Earths ecosystem.

    1Parisa Ariya is a professor of Chemistry and Atmospheric

    and Oceanic Sciences at McGill University, Canada. Her

    research entails understanding atmospheric transformation of

    selected organic compounds and trace metals.2Marc Amyot is a professor of biological sciences at

    Universit!e de Montreal, Canada. His research focuses on

    biogeochemistry of heavy metals in aquatic environment.

    New Directions / Atmospheric Environment 38 (2004) 123112321232