1 scope of the proposed directives (distance sales (odsdir) + supply of digital content (dcdir))...
DESCRIPTION
3 Specific rules ODSGDir -Object: -only goods (excl. carriers of digital content), no service contracts or service part of sales contracts, but incl. goods to be manufactured -Consideration: -in exchange for a price < only sales -Sales method : -only distance sales (incl. online sales) defined in art. 2(e) > further fragmentation of sales law (CISG, national B2B, P2P, B2C offline (distance sales now excluded from other consumer Directives, ….). Especially criticized is difference between distance and non-distance B2C sales of the same goods. Higher protection allowed in non-distance sales !? -excluding sales by way of execution or otherwise by the authority of law (2(d))TRANSCRIPT
1
Scope of the proposed Directives
(distance sales (ODSDir) + supply of digital content
(DCDir))Prof. Matthias E. Storme
Institute for commercial and insolvency law
KU Leuven
2
Common characteristics
- Both deal with ‘contracts’ (with a classical definition of ‘contract’)
- Presuppose that the applicable law is the law of a MS- No cross-border requirement, includes domestic contracts- Only B2C contracts:
- > lack of protection of SME’s, non-profit organisations, etc.- > does not apply in P2P (or C2C) transactions – new sharing economy !??- Definition of consumer unclear as to mixed/dual purpose acquisitions
(only a recital)- Unilaterally mandatory (in favour of the consumer) (art. 18
ODSDir and art. 19 DCDir)- However art. 16 ODSDir and art. 17 DCDir grant the supplier
a ‘right of redress’ against earlier links, - but rules left to national law …: does it say anything ? Naked
and to be vested ... (last slide)
3
Specific rules ODSGDir
- Object:- only goods (excl. carriers of digital content), no service contracts or
service part of sales contracts, but incl. goods to be manufactured
- Consideration:- in exchange for a price < only sales
- Sales method :- only distance sales (incl. online sales) defined in art. 2(e) > further
fragmentation of sales law (CISG, national B2B, P2P, B2C offline (distance sales now excluded from other consumer Directives, ….). Especially criticized is difference between distance and non-distance B2C sales of the same goods. Higher protection allowed in non-distance sales !?
- excluding sales by way of execution or otherwise by the authority of law (2(d))
4
Specific rules SDCDir- Object:- ‘supply’ digital content irrespective of the carrier/medium of
transmission, incl. digital services; incl. services in relation to content created by the consumer itself
- > Art. 2 (1)(a) enumerates 3 types of (supply of) digital content- a) data produced in digital form, eg video (photos, movies etc.), audio
(music etc.), applications, digital games and any other software (incl. databases, e-books, …)
- b) service allowing creation, processing or storage of digital data provided by the consumer
- c) service allowing sharing of / interaction with digital data provided by other users of the service
- > irrespective of the method: durable medium, download, streaming, cloud, host providing, …
- Excluded / not considered as digital content: e-communication healthcare, gambling, financial services , and other services with significant human intervention (eg non-machine translation) where only the output is delivered digitally (art. 3(5))
- Excluded: ‘smart goods’
5
Specific rules SDCDir
- Irrespective of the qualification of the contract- > sales, licensing, rental, service contract, ….: regardless of
temporary or definitive character of the right acquired; including product designed according to consumers’s specifications (art. 3(2))
- But qualification will remain relevant under national law for non-harmonised aspects
- Covering also the service level agreement concerning the digital content itself, but not covering services not functioning as carrier (such as telecommunication services)
6
Specific rules SDCDir
- Consideration:- Supplied in exchange for a price and/or for personal data (except
where data collected only to meet legal requirements, art. 3 (4))
- Sales method:- Not limited to distance sales
7
“Full” harmonisation- “Full” harmonisation: raises the question of what exactly
is regulated and what not (as with the CRD 2011/83). - < does not exclude that the consumer acquires from the eller a direct action
against an earlier chain- Within the scope: no place for overriding mandatory law
nor public policy exception- Some national rules on aspects not regulated may
interfere- eg avoidance for mistake may lead to higher protection- Is the good faith exception in or out ? If out > disparity- right to damages for non-performance (only “economic damage to
the digital environment” is “in”)- No full harmonisation for commercial guarantees: higher
level of protection possible (art. 15 ODSDir)
8
“Full” harmonisation- Matters not regulated: apply principles of equivalence and
effectiveness (duty to give full effect, art. 4(3) TFEU)- quid granting consumers more rights on the basis of extracontractual
liability (concurrency of actions) ? Unlimited concurrency against effet utile ?
- National language rules ? (for unfair contractual langage requirements, see Unfair Terms Directive)
- Or regulated only in principle: idem (apply principles of equivalence and effectiveness (duty to give full effect, art. 4(3) TFEU)
- > They need some national dressing by national law- Some matters not fully harmonised, ag liability for “economic damage to
the digital environment” in art. 14 DCDir- Right of redress
- > Limitation periods are governed by national law, but may not be shorter than 2 years from the time “relevant for establishing conformity” (as determined by art. 8 ODSDir) ((art. 14 in fine ODSDir)