1 special librarians association annual meeting toronto, on june 7, 2005 generic pharmaceuticals...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Special Librarians Association Annual Meeting
Toronto, ON
June 7, 2005
Generic PharmaceuticalsDeveloping a Crystal Ball to Craft Product Portfolio
2
US Generic Pharmaceutical Sector – Agenda Trends & Analysis
•A 50,000 ft. view of the generic market
•Basic template for examining a generics portfolio Typical information sources
Atypical information sources
Timing
Information into analysis
•Salient industry trends
•Discussion
Copyright 2005 Cardinal HealthAll Rights Reserved
3
2004 Total Market Revenues 2004 Unit Market Share
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
USA France Germany Italy Spain UK
2004 Rx Drug Units1 (%)
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
USA Western Europe
Rx Drug 2004 Revenues ($B)
~$230B
~$120B~$17B
~$1B
~$7B
<$1B~$1B
~$3B
France
Germany
Italy
Spain
UK
Sources: IMS Health; Marakon Associates -- Excludes some branded generics units
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
USA FranceGermany Italy Spain UK
Branded
Generics
US & EU Generic Sector Significant and Growing Percentage of Prescription Drug Volume
Copyright 2005 Cardinal HealthAll Rights Reserved
4
•API sourcing strength
•Uncanny predictive capabilities
•Speed to develop
•Appetite for risk
•Speed to market
•Ultra low cost
It’s Better to be First than it is to be Better
Being First is Everything ! Significant and Growing Percentage of Prescription Drug Volume
•Fast & severe generic penetrationGeneric penetration >50% in first 30
days
Managed care driving hard
•Price erosion a function of the number of competitors
2nd wave entrants have a non-linear impact
Generic price at < 50% in the 1st 6 months
•Still a significant upside for generics
Current Market TrendsCurrent Market Trends
Copyright 2005 Cardinal HealthAll Rights Reserved
5
A Typical Generic Development Cycle Non-Litigation SODF Example
BrandBrand
ProducProductt
File DMFFile DMFFileFile
ANDAANDA
FileFilePatentPatentCertCert
Validation &Validation &ApprovalApprovalPrepPrep
ANDAANDAApprovalApproval
PatentPatentReviewReview
SourcingSourcingPre-FormPre-Form
Form &Form &Pilot BioPilot Bio
StabilityStabilityPK StudyPK Study
PortfolioPortfolioReviewReview
9 mo.9 mo. 2 mo.2 mo. 6-12 mo.6-12 mo. 12 mo.12 mo. 5 mo.5 mo. 12-18 mo.12-18 mo.
Outside CounselOutside Counsel
API SuppliersAPI Suppliers
Business DevBusiness Dev
KeyKey
InfluencesInfluences
• API suppliers wield significant power…Early
Access to difficult to develop API
Access to potential Paragraph IV opportunity
Access to sufficient quantities for development
API SuppliersAPI Suppliers
CROCRO
API SuppliersAPI Suppliers
Supply ChainSupply Chain
Copyright 2005 Cardinal HealthAll Rights Reserved
6
Just Because You CAN File… Don’t Believe Everything You Read
JP Morgan – Generic Industry Update, July-2004
Source: JP Morgan – Generic Process; USFDA Orange Book (on-line)Copyright 2005 Cardinal Health
All Rights Reserved
7
Four Types of ANDA Filings Non-Litigation SODF Example
Source: JP Morgan – Generic Process
•Lower Risk
•Low to medium return
•High risk
•Significant cost
•Potentially massive return
180-days generic market exclusivity
1st mover typically retains share past 180 days
Copyright 2005 Cardinal HealthAll Rights Reserved
8
A Litigation Generic Development Cycle Paragraph IV SODF Example
Timeline is 66
to 72 months
If successful, 1st generic is granted 180 days of generic market exclusivity
FDA Starts30-month
Stay of Approval
File DMF
FileANDA
FilePatentCert
Generic Development Generic Development ProgramProgram
BrandFiles
InfringementSuit
LowerCourt
Decision
AppellateCourt
Decision
ANDAApproval
34 - 40 mo. 3 mo. 30 mo. 6-12 mo.
Launch
Copyright 2005 Cardinal HealthAll Rights Reserved
9
Paragraph IV Cases are Messy & Expensive It NEVER Goes Smoothly
• Brand is not required to sue 30-month stay starts when suit is filed Generic can request declaratory judgment
• Exclusivity only granted for the 1st to file Paragraph IV
Exclusivity can be split
• Typically an appeal Lately a trend to launch “at risk”
• NOT a “1 size fits all” strategy
Source: Adapted from Bear Stearns Bottle Report, Aug 31, 2004
Copyright 2005 Cardinal HealthAll Rights Reserved
10
High Level Portfolio Decision Inputs The Magic Triangle
•What do you really want?Accuracy
Flexibility
Speed
Process or 1-off
•What do you have to work with?Basic product information
Innovator organization information
Therapeutic information
Market data
IP Assessments
API Intelligence
GoodGood
CheapCheapFastFast
QualityQuality
CostCostSpeedSpeed
Copyright 2005 Cardinal HealthAll Rights Reserved
11
Basic Information
Innovator Organization
Therapeutic Classification
Market Information
Molecule
Dose form
Brand product
Brand intro date
Strengths
Packaging
Indication
Other dose forms
Organizational expertise
IP Assessment
API Intelligence
Brand developer
Manufacturer
Marketer
Co-Pro ?
LCM behavior
In-house Generic
Franchise ?
Parent-child
Other countries
Relevant strategies
Therapeutic class
Drug class
Key brand competitors
Concomitant meds?
Dosing regimen
Chronic or acute
Unit volumes
Sales volumes
Pricing
Channel %
Primary channel
OB patents
Exclusivities
Dates
Patent types
Abstracts
# of sources
Consistency
Cost
PDRPublic ReportsNews/Press
SEC (Edgar)WebsiteIntelligence
PDRFacts & Comparisons
IMS, NDC, et alFirst Data Bank
FDA Orange BookIP Counsel
NewportOPD Buyers GuideFDAINTERACTION
Mid-Level Portfolio Decision Inputs API Sourcing is Key
Expertise
ExpenseCopyright 2005 Cardinal Health
All Rights Reserved
12
•Dose form•Brand sales•Brand unit volume•Expected erosion model•Company advantage•Strategic fit
•Dose form•Brand sales•Brand unit volume•Expected erosion model•Company advantage•Strategic fit
•Lead / opportunity ID•Requests within Org•News / market intel•API opportunities•Partner opportunities
•Lead / opportunity ID•Requests within Org•News / market intel•API opportunities•Partner opportunities
•Database screening criteria
•Financial models•Company advantage
•Database screening criteria
•Financial models•Company advantage
Base PortfolioBase PortfolioPre-Screening Hopper
Pre-Screening Hopper
High Level Screen
High Level Screen
Pharmaceutical Universe
Pharmaceutical Universe
Consistent ReviewConsistent ReviewConsistent ReviewConsistent Review
Balanced PortfolioBalanced Portfolio
Stepwise Screens Enable a Flexible Portfolio
•Periodic review•Review prior to significant expenditures
•Review per significant changes/events in market
•Periodic review•Review prior to significant expenditures
•Review per significant changes/events in market
Copyright 2005 Cardinal HealthAll Rights Reserved
13
A Typical Generic Development Cycle Non-Litigation SODF Example
BrandBrand
ProducProductt
File DMFFile DMFFileFile
ANDAANDA
FileFilePatentPatentCertCert
Validation &Validation &ApprovalApprovalPrepPrep
ANDAANDAApprovalApproval
PatentPatentReviewReview
SourcingSourcingPre-FormPre-Form
Form &Form &Pilot BioPilot Bio
StabilityStabilityPK StudyPK Study
PortfolioPortfolioReviewReview
9 mo.9 mo. 2 mo.2 mo. 6-12 mo.6-12 mo. 12 mo.12 mo. 5 mo.5 mo. 12-18 mo.12-18 mo.
Outside CounselOutside Counsel
API SuppliersAPI Suppliers
Business DevBusiness Dev
KeyKey
InfluencesInfluences
• API suppliers wield significant power…Early
Access to difficult to develop API
Access to potential Paragraph IV opportunity
Access to sufficient quantities for development
API SuppliersAPI Suppliers
CROCRO
API SuppliersAPI Suppliers
Supply ChainSupply Chain
Copyright 2005 Cardinal HealthAll Rights Reserved
14
•To qualify the opportunity (build the model) we need:
Market data (Dollars & Units)Market data (Dollars & Units)
Understanding of the IP situationUnderstanding of the IP situation
Perspective on API availabilityPerspective on API availability
Market trends & expected competitionMarket trends & expected competition
Therapeutic class trendsTherapeutic class trends
Pharmacokinetic & pharmacology informationPharmacokinetic & pharmacology information
Regulatory requirementsRegulatory requirements
Perspective on resident capabilitiesPerspective on resident capabilities
Basic Inputs for a Predictive Generic Model Beware the Point of Diminishing Returns
Copyright 2005 Cardinal HealthAll Rights Reserved
15
I. The size of the Advair® market is staggering
II. Follow on COPD pipe-lines are mostly early stage
III. Generics have had some limited success in challenging UK patents
III. US patents have not yet been challenged
Generic version of Advair for US Market could be lucrative
Build a forecast model
Hypothesis
Portfolio Intelligence Example Prospectively Qualifying an Opportunity
Portfolio Example
Sources: Factiva, Pharma Marketletter, M2 Presswire, Bull Int. Inform Droit et Pharmacie, Bernstein Research Call, FDA
Copyright 2005 Cardinal HealthAll Rights Reserved
16
I. If IMS (et al) data is unavailable, other references can be used
II. For IPI. FDA Orange Book
II. US PTO
III. FDA Paragraph IV site
Advair forecast supports assumption of large market
P-IV filing is uncertain
Dose form will have legs
Interim Conclusion
III. DPI Dose Forms can be expected to remain prevalent
Portfolio Intelligence Example, cont. Prospectively Qualifying an Opportunity
Portfolio Example
Sources: Lehman Brothers, USFDA Orange Book, USPTO, Express Scripts
Copyright 2005 Cardinal HealthAll Rights Reserved
17
I. API is available but limitedI. It will be expensive OR
II. It will be unobtainable
II. Generic market trends favor technology challenges, etc.
Cost prohibitive
GSK will vigorously protect
Smaller numbers of generics
Interim Conclusion
III. Generics have wide adoption for pulmonary indications
IV. Advair is priced lower than the sum of its “parts”
Portfolio Intelligence Example, cont. Prospectively Qualifying an Opportunity
Portfolio Example
Sources: USFDA, Thomson Newport Strategies, Lehman Brothers, Express Scripts
Copyright 2005 Cardinal HealthAll Rights Reserved
18
I. Product doses b.i.d. and has asthma & COPD indications
II. GSK has a pediatric extension for Advair
Longer market life
Market entry will be later
Non-standard regulatory path
Highly differentiated technology
Interim Conclusion
III. FDA has codified the regulatory pathway
Portfolio Intelligence Example, cont. Prospectively Qualifying an Opportunity
IV. DPI technology is becoming more scarce
Portfolio Example
Sources: Thomson Micromedix PDR, Adis R&D Insight, USFDA, Pfizer Website
Copyright 2005 Cardinal HealthAll Rights Reserved
19
Advair® Enjoys Significant US Market GrowthFluticasone/Salmeterol DPI Forecast Through 2013
Portfolio Example
• Forecast the brand Linear regression vs. othersLinear regression vs. others
Usually a WAG
Depends on quantity of historical info
Stick with unitsStick with units Dollars useless after generic launch
Gut testGut test
• Enormous market potential at 2009 peak
• GSK transitioning volume from Flovent®
• Technical challenges limit generic competition
• Thin innovative pipeline for asthma & COPD
• UK patent resolution alludes to at least 3 generics in US market at patent expiry
Copyright 2005 Cardinal HealthAll Rights Reserved
20
# of Generic Competitors
2nd+ Wave
1st Wave
Portfolio Intelligence Example, cont. Prospectively Qualifying an Opportunity
• Number of generic entrants
• Which entry wave
• Who are the generics (and from where)
• Dose form (channel)
Price ErosionPrice Erosion
Portfolio Example
• Managed care diving much of this
• CMS vs. 3PP
•Who is the brand
• Indication
Generic PenetrationGeneric Penetration
Copyright 2005 Cardinal HealthAll Rights Reserved
21
Limited API – DMF TalleyLimited API – DMF TalleyLimited API – DMF TalleyLimited API – DMF Talley
AbbottChemagisCiplaHovioneSicorSterling (It)
Fluticasone Fluticasone Fluticasone Fluticasone SalmeterolSalmeterol SalmeterolSalmeterol
66
Cipla
11
Key Technical ChallengesKey Technical ChallengesKey Technical ChallengesKey Technical Challenges
• API source
• DPI device access
• Legal resources & wherewithal
• Manufacturing capabilities
Generics Face Significant HurdlesCan it be Done ?
• Most US generic manufacturers are configured for solid orals Ivax, Cipla most capable for pulmonary deliveryIvax, Cipla most capable for pulmonary delivery
• Limited sources of Salmeterol = limited # of generics
• Limited generic organizations with sufficient resources
• Access to a DPI device and manufacturing know-how will be scarce
Portfolio Example
Copyright 2005 Cardinal HealthAll Rights Reserved
22
• Electricity
• Food
• Entertainment
• Rent
$100
$300
$400
$1,200
Average
$50
$150
$150
$1,200
$400
$500
$1000
$1,200
HighLow
$1,550Monthly Total $2,000 $3,100
$400$400
$700$700
$1,200$1,200
$75$75
$2,375$1,770 $2,900
$290$290
$902$902
$1,200$1,200
$52$52
Monte Carlo SimulationsEmploying a Quantitative Measure of Risk
Copyright 2005 Cardinal HealthAll Rights Reserved
23
Quantifying RiskProbability for Year 3 EBITProbability for Year 3 EBIT
Portfolio Example
Copyright 2005 Cardinal HealthAll Rights Reserved
24
Quantifying RiskVariable SensitivityVariable Sensitivity
Portfolio Example
Copyright 2005 Cardinal HealthAll Rights Reserved
PerceivedPerceivedRisk Risk
Actual Risk
Generic Portfolio Modeling PitfallsPerfectionists Need Not Apply…
Assumption Assumption VariabilityVariability
Access to API
Authorized Generics
Price Erosion Assumptions
Life Cycle ManagementIMS Data
Shifting Reimbursement Landscape
Off-Shore Competition
Market Share Assumptions
Copyright 2005 Cardinal HealthAll Rights Reserved
26
Portfolio Intelligence An Easy Way and a Hard Way
Source: Thomson Newport Strategies
Copyright 2005 Cardinal HealthAll Rights Reserved
27
Key Generic Sector Trends Boom Times
• Significant industry consolidation Pricing stability
• Brand protection strategies continue to evolve
• New entrants from low-cost geographies Pricing IN-stability
• API strategic sourcing
• Follow-on Proteins
• Authorized generics Very
Copyright 2005 Cardinal HealthAll Rights Reserved
28
•Significant industry consolidation
Stratification into very large and very small organizations
Many of the mid-tier are API mfgs who have crossed over to make dose
Key Current Generic Sector Trends Continued Consolidation Will Create a Caste System
Source: ABN-AMRO Healthcare Banking – The Changing Competitive Landscape – IRR Generics Summit – Sep-2004
Copyright 2005 Cardinal HealthAll Rights Reserved
29
•Brand protection evolves Authorized generics
Generic subsidiaries
ReformulationsDose form
Isomers
Strengths
PatentsMetabolite
Polymorph
Late-listings
FDA mechanismsCitizens petition
Label changes
Legislation
Key Current Generic Sector Trends Brand Protection is Constantly Evolving
Source: Bear Stearns Bottle Report, Aug 31, 2004
Innovator Generic SubsidiaryMerck WestPoint Pharma
Schering Warrick
Pfizer Greenstone
Novartis Sandoz
J&J Patriot
Sanofi-Aventis ?????
Copyright 2005 Cardinal HealthAll Rights Reserved
30
Low Cost Countries Penetrating US Market The Profile of Indian API Has Risen Sharply in the Past 5 Years
Source: Arthur D. Little Benelux
•Lax IP protection created API development haven WTO patent adherence kicked in Jan-2005
•Most API firms now make finished dose Cipla, Reddy Cheminor, Ranbaxy & Wockhardt are the largest
•India now has the greatest number of FDA approved manufacturing sites outside of the U.S.
Copyright 2005 Cardinal HealthAll Rights Reserved
31
•Backward integration into API production Ivax – Chemsource; Sandoz – Lek; Actavis – Fako
•Forward integration Ranbaxy, Reddy Cheminor, Glenmark
•Bus Dev alliances with API/dose companies
Cipla – Watson; Cipla – Ivax
•SPCs (EU) limit competition No Bolar provision
•Fewer independent, high caliber API mfgs. are available today
Strategic relationships
Organic pursuit of finished dose
•Increasing use of licensing & alliances vs. simple purchasing
Success attracts partners
Alliances are struck much earlier
Generics & API are Inexorably Linked As Consolidation Diminishes Sourcing Options, Relationships Prevail
Sources: Q Street Advisors
Copyright 2005 Cardinal HealthAll Rights Reserved
32
Generic BiologicsNow a Question of WHEN (and HOW)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
19
82
19
83
19
84
19
85
19
86
19
87
19
88
19
89
19
90
19
91
19
92
19
93
19
94
19
95
19
96
19
97
19
98
19
99
20
00
20
01
20
02
New Biotech Drug and Vaccine Approvals/New Indication Approvals by Year
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002
U.S. Biotech Revenues•Biopharmaceuticals growing at 2x the rate of total pharmaceuticals
•Marketed (US) biologics are approx. $30 billion 12% of total pharmaceuticals
Growing 20% annually
By 2010, will reach $60 billion (US)
• Over 850 biotech products & vaccines currently in clinical trials
250 Products: Phase III
600 Products: Phase I & II
•The average 1-Day Cost (2003) for Biotech is $45
All other drugs = $1.66
Source: Ernst & Young; http://www.bio.org/er/approveddrugs.asp
Copyright 2005 Cardinal HealthAll Rights Reserved
33
Authorized GenericsStrange Bedfellows
•An NDA brand product which is re-labeled and marketed under the generic drug name Can license to another company or self market through subsidiary
•PhRMA companies are motivated to launch an AG to : Settle patent litigation
Maximize profit at or after generic competition hits their brand
Address manufacturing capacity issues
•Generic companies are motivated to accept an AG to : Settle litigation
Enter an otherwise prohibitive market / sector
Drive incremental revenue
Copyright 2005 Cardinal HealthAll Rights Reserved
34
Key Take Aways
•The Generic sector will continue to grow… …more fiercely competitive !
•Consolidation will continue Key differentiation will be speed, flexibility
•Sector will polarize into an Oligopoly Morphing into Specialty organizations &
•Generic Biologicals will happen Cost pressures will force the issue
TrendsTrends
•API sourcing strength Early awareness
Strong relationships
•Accurate predictive capabilities
•Sector situational awareness Regulatory & legislative
M&A
•Speed to develop / to market
•Understanding your appetite for risk
•Ultra-efficient
RequireRequire
Copyright 2005 Cardinal HealthAll Rights Reserved