1 sustainable tourism: travel groups and intervention strategies susanne böhler, wuppertal...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Sustainable Tourism:Travel Groups and Intervention Strategies
Susanne Böhler, Wuppertal Institute for Climate Environment EnergySylvie Grischkat, University of LüneburgSonja Haustein, Ruhr-University BochumMarcel Hunecke, Ruhr-University Bochum
UNIVERSITÄT LÜNEBURGFachbereich IV
Institut für Umweltstrategien
Projekt: MOBILANZ In Cooperation with
Wuppertal Institute University of LüneburgRuhr-University Bochum
Financed by
2
Facts and Trends of Tourism
80 % of persons in Germany (>14 years of age) made at least one holiday trip in 2003.
An increase from 720 million tourists worldwide in 2004 to 1600 million in 2020 is predicted.
Most trips are conducted by car. 80 % of European air travel is due to tourism. Aviation has shown the highest growth rate. The majority of the greenhouse gases of domestic tourism is emitted
during travel to and from the holiday destination (60 %).
3
Research Questions
What is travel behaviour like? How is the environmental impact? Do individual characteristics explain travel behaviour? What are the strategies and obstacles to reduce environmental
impact of holiday mobility?
4
Research Questions
What is travel behaviour like? How is the environmental impact? Do individual characteristics explain travel behaviour? What are the strategies and obstacles to reduce environmental
impact of holiday mobility?
5
ActivitiesTrips per year and person
Km travelled per year and person
Average km travelled per trip
and person
Working 286.4 4482 15.6
Shopping 241.6 487 2.0
Private Errands 137.2 577 4.2
Leisure time 390.2 4053 10.4
Short stay trip 4.0 1055 263.8
Holiday 3.2 3839 1199.7
Description of the MOBILANZ Sample (N=1991): Mobility purposes
6
ActivitiesTrips per year and person
Km travelled per year and person
Average km travelled per trip
and person
Working 286.4 4482 15.6
Shopping 241.6 487 2.0
Private Errands 137.2 577 4.2
Leisure time 390.2 4053 10.4
Short stay trip 4.0 1055 263.8
Holiday 3.2 3839 1199.7
Description of the MOBILANZ Sample (N=1991): Mobility purposes
7
Holiday Trips [%]
Short Stay Trips [%]
Non-motorized Travel 0.3 0.4
Car Travel 60.7 77.1
Public Transport Travel (local) 9.1 9.2
Public Transport Travel (long distance) 7.4 11.6
Air Travel 22.5 1.7
Modal Split of Holiday and Short Stay Trips (N=1991)
8
Description of the Sample by Travel Groups (N=1984)
Travel Group Kilometer categories
n %
Non-Traveller
Local Traveller
Mid-distance Traveller
Long-haul Traveller
0
1 to 600
601 to 3000
> 3000
491
523
757
213
24.7
26.4
38.2
10.7
9
Non-Traveller
Local Traveller
Mid-distance Traveller
Long-haul Traveller
Number of holiday trips (means)
0.0 1.8 2.3 2.7
Number of short stay trips (means)
1.2 2.1 2.3 2.7
Travel Groups: Number of holiday trips and short-stay trips per year
10
Transport Modes [%]Local
TravellerMid-distance
TravellerLong-haul Traveller
Non-motorized Travel 0.5 0.3 0.0
Car Travel 80.7 56.6 27.6
Public Transport Travel (local)
9.7 10.1 3.9
Public Transport Travel (long distance)
8.7 7.1 4.6
Air Travel 0.4 25.9 63.9
Travel Groups: Transportation Mode Choice
11
Travel Groups: Description by Main IndicatorsTravel Group Age and Household Educa
-tionIncome Psychological Dimension
Non-Traveller
high share of unemployment -- --
Low openness to change, high rating for public transport-
excitement and public transport-control
Local Traveller
30 to 60 years old, married couples,
children in household- -
Mid-distance Traveller
Middle-aged, double income households + ++ High self-enhancement
Long-haul Traveller
26 to 35 or 51-65 years old, no children ++ +
High openness to change and self-enhancement, low rating for public transport-excitement and
public transport-control
12
Research Questions
What is travel behaviour like? How is the environmental impact? Do individual characteristics explain travel behaviour? What are the strategies and obstacles to reduce environmental
impact of holiday mobility?
13
Travel Groups: Ecological Impact of Holiday Travel
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Local-traveller Mid-distance traveller Long-haul traveller all (average)
Car travel Public transport travel (local) Public transport travel (long-distance) Air travel
CO
2-e
quiv
alen
t in
kg p
er y
ear
and
pers
on
14
Travel Groups: Ecological Impact of Daily Mobility
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
Non-traveller Local-traveller Mid-distance traveller Long-haul traveller all (average)
working shopping private errands leisure time short-stay holiday
CO
2-eq
uiv
alen
t in
kg
per
yea
r an
d p
erso
n
CO2-e
quviv
alen
t in
kg p
er y
ear a
nd p
erso
n
15
Research Questions
What is travel behaviour like? How is the environmental impact? Do individual characteristics explain travel behaviour? What are the strategies and obstacles to reduce environmental
impact of holiday mobility?
16
Variables B SE ß
Income 0.45 0.04 0.32 ***
Household size -0.45 0.05 -0.21 ***
Higher education 0.80 0.13 0.14 ***
Living-apart-together relationship 0.58 0.20 0.07 **
Openness to change 0.25 0.04 0.14 ***
Public transp ort excitement -0.18 0.06 -0.07 **
Note. R2 = .17 adjusted R2 = .17 **p < .01; ***p < .001
Stepwise Regression to Predict Greenhouse Gas Emissions
17
Summary
There are significant differences between travel groups. Travel Groups’ behaviour differs concerning number of holiday
trips and transportation mode. The smallest group (10.7%) is responsible for most emissions of
greenhouse gases. Socio-demographic variables are important factors for holiday
pattern. Values like “Openess für Chance” have an effect on number of
trips and distances travelled. A contradiction between ecological awareness and holiday
behaviour is identified within all travel groups.
18
Research Questions
What is travel behaviour like? How is the environmental impact? Do individual characteristics explain travel behaviour? What are the strategies and obstacles to reduce
environmental impact of holiday mobility?
19
Strategies for Sustainable TourismConcerning Travel behaviour
Change of Holiday Destination – Reduction of Distances Transportation Mode Shift to Long-distance Train and Coach Compensation Opportunities Economic Instruments Communication
20
Intervention Strategies for Travel GroupsTravel Group
Characteristics Choice of Destination
Transportation Mode Choice
Compensation Information Pricing instruments / mechanism
Long-haul Travellers10.7%
High rate of mobilityImportance of air travelNo childrenEcological impactPotential for reduction
+/-
+
+
Mid-distance Travellers38.2%
60% of the trips by carFamilies + + +
Local Traveller26.4%
Short distances80% of the trips by carPositive ecological balanceAttitudes towards public transport
+
+
+
Non-Travellers24.7%
Financial constrainsLess interest in travelling
+
21
Perspectives for Sustainable Tourism
Limited possibilities to change holiday travel behaviour and to reduce environmental impact under current conditions.
Coaches and long-distance trains are options for a more sustainable holiday travel, but
interviews proved especially less experience with train travelling for holiday and a high extent of refusal of train travelling due to choice of destination, time money and complicity.
More knowledge about individual motivation of choice of destination and the acceptance and effects of intervention strategies are necessary.
Intervention strategies and the development of services should consider different target groups.
22
Thank you for your attention!
[email protected]@uni-lueneburg.de
For further information check the Internet for MOBILANZ
http://eco.psy.ruhr-bochum.de/mobilanz