1 the asian aerosol contribution to north american pm pollution: recognizing asian transport...
Post on 19-Dec-2015
216 views
TRANSCRIPT
1
The Asian Aerosol Contribution to The Asian Aerosol Contribution to North American PM Pollution:North American PM Pollution:
Recognizing Asian TransportRecognizing Asian TransportComposition and ConcentrationComposition and Concentration
Modeling Regional Aerosol BurdensModeling Regional Aerosol Burdens
Richard “Tony” VanCurenCalifornia Air Resources Board
ICAP October 22, 2004
3
The April 1998 Asian Dust Storms: The April 1998 Asian Dust Storms: a Natural Experimenta Natural Experiment
Image after Husar, 2000
VanCuren & Cahill, 2002
4
Asian Dust Frequency (% of days by month 1988-Asian Dust Frequency (% of days by month 1988-99)99)
Northeast Pacific BasinNortheast Pacific Basin
VanCuren & Cahill, 2002
5
Comparative Frequency and ConcentrationComparative Frequency and ConcentrationAsian Asian vsvs. African Dust in Eastern North . African Dust in Eastern North
AmericaAmerica
FREQUENCY CONCENTRATION|
VanCuren & Cahill, 2002
6
Composition of the Whole Asian Composition of the Whole Asian Plume:Plume:“Minimum Concentration” Hypothesis:• Lemma:
Asian pollutants in West are broadly distributed, and ~ equal;local pollutants are variable.
• Implications:Mean concentration = mean Asian + mean local concentrations. Lowest means imply least local pollutants - CRLA & LAVO.
Staged Analysis (Crater Lake & Lassen):• Selected Asian Days: First Approximation - composition
when Asian dust dominates and no local fires (low OC/S).• All Asian Days: Aerosol composition for all days with Asian
Dust - recognize local fire contribution.• All Days: Aerosol composition for all days in transport
season (March - October) - recognize local sources.
7
Cl-
Na Al
Ca
Fe Si
Ti H
OC
EC
Kn
on Br
Pb
Zn
SO
4=
NO
3-
0.00.10.20.30.4
PC
1
ASIAN DUST & COMBUSTION 0.93
Cl-
Na Al
Ca
Fe Si
Ti H
OC
EC
Kn
on Br
Pb
Zn
SO
4=
NO
3-
0.00.10.20.30.40.5
ASIAN DUST & COMBUSTION 0.79
Cl-
Na Al
Ca
Fe Si
Ti H
OC
EC
Kn
on Br
Pb
Zn
SO
4=
NO
3-
-0.10.00.10.20.30.4
CRLV_PCZ16_ALL
ASIAN DUST & COMBUSTION 0.87
Cl-
Na Al
Ca
Fe Si
Ti H
OC
EC
Kn
on Br
Pb
Zn
SO
4=
NO
3-
-0.4-0.2-0.00.2
PC
2
AGED SMOKE, REACTED SEA SALT 0.08
Cl-
Na Al
Ca
Fe Si
Ti H
OC
EC
Kn
on Br
Pb
Zn
SO
4=
NO
3-
-0.3-0.10.10.3
AGED SMOKE, REACTED SEA SALT 0.43
Cl-
Na Al
Ca
Fe Si
Ti H
OC
EC
Kn
on Br
Pb
Zn
SO
4=
NO
3-
-0.5-0.3-0.10.10.3
AGED SMOKE, REACTED SEA SALT 0.17
Cl-
Na
Al
Ca
Fe Si
Ti H
OC
EC
Kn
on
Br
Pb
Zn
SO
4=
NO
3--0.3
-0.00.30.6
PC
3
SEA SALT, NO SMOKE -0.05
Cl-
Na Al
Ca
Fe Si
Ti H
OC
EC
Kn
on
Br
Pb
Zn
SO
4=
NO
3--0.6
-0.3-0.00.3
FRESH SMOKE, NO SEA SALT 0.16
Cl-
Na Al
Ca
Fe Si
Ti H
OC
EC
Kn
on Br
Pb
Zn
SO
4=
NO
3-
-0.6-0.4-0.2-0.00.20.4 FRESH SMOKE, DUST, NO SALT 0.09
Cl-
Na Al
Ca
Fe Si
Ti H
OC
EC
Kn
on Br
Pb
Zn
SO
4=
NO
3-
-0.5-0.3-0.10.10.30.50.7
PC
4
AGRICULTURAL SMOKE (RICE) -0.03
Cl-
Na Al
Ca
Fe Si
Ti H
OC
EC
Kn
on Br
Pb
Zn
SO
4=
NO
3-
-0.4-0.20.00.20.40.60.8
AGRICULTURAL SMOKE (RICE), SOIL DUST -0.03
Cl-
Na Al
Ca
Fe Si
Ti H
OC
EC
Kn
on Br
Pb
Zn
SO
4=
NO
3-
-0.3-0.10.10.30.50.70.9
MOTOR VEHICLE, ROAD DUST 0.02
Cl-
Na Al
Ca
Fe Si
Ti H
OC
EC
Kn
on Br
Pb
Zn
SO
4=
NO
3-
LOW SMOKEHIGH CONFIDENCE ASIAN DUST
-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2-0.00.2
PC
5
AGRICULTURAL SMOKE (GRASS), SOIL DUST -0.06
Cl-
Na Al
Ca
Fe Si
Ti H
OC
EC
Kn
on Br
Pb
Zn
SO
4=
NO
3-
ALL DAYSHIGH CONFIDENCE ASIAN DUST
-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.20.00.20.4
SOIL DUST, REACTED SEA SALT -0.09
Cl-
Na Al
Ca
Fe Si
Ti H
OC
EC
Kn
on Br
Pb
Zn
SO
4=
NO
3-
ALL DAYSMARCH - OCTOBER
-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.20.00.20.4
PC
6
SOIL DUST, SEA SALT -0.03
Generalizing - known events to all Generalizing - known events to all daysdays
8
Regression-Derived Source & CompositionRegression-Derived Source & CompositionBreakdown for Crater Lake / Mt. Lassen AerosolBreakdown for Crater Lake / Mt. Lassen Aerosol
MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN % S.D. %
TOTAL MASS (PM10) 6.7 3.9 6.7 5.1 7.4 6.2 DUSTY ASIAN PLUME 6.4 4.2 4.9 4.3 4.5 4.0 60 54
AGED SMOKE & SEA SALT 0.15 0.10 1.7 1.2 0.46 1.2 6 16FRESH SMOKE & LOCAL DUST 0.02 0.25 1.5 1.7 20 23
SEA SALT 0.02 0.26ROAD VEHICLE & DUST 0.17 0.50 2 7AGRICULTURAL SMOKE 0.06 0.88 0.01 0.45SEA SALT & SOIL DUST 0.04 0.67 0.93 0.93 13 13
COARSE MASS (PM10-2.5) 2.9 1.9 2.9 2.9 3.8 3.9 51 52 DUSTY ASIAN PLUME 2.9 1.9 2.8 2.4 1.9 2.0 25 27
AGED SMOKE & SEA SALT 0 0 0 0.10 0 0.45 0 6FRESH SMOKE & LOCAL DUST 0 0.15 1.2 1.4 16 18
SEA SALT 0.01 0.06ROAD VEHICLE & DUST 0.17 0.47 2 6AGRICULTURAL SMOKE 0.05 0.81 0.01 0.05SEA SALT & SOIL DUST 0.04 0.57 0.88 0.86 12 12
FINE MASS (PM2.5) 3.8 2.0 3.8 2.3 3.6 2.4 49 32 DUSTY ASIAN PLUME 3.5 2.3 2.1 2.0 2.6 2.0 35 27
AGED SMOKE & SEA SALT 0.15 0.10 1.7 1.1 0.46 0.74 6 10FRESH SMOKE & LOCAL DUST 0.02 0.10 0.26 0.39 4 5
SEA SALT 0.02 0.20ROAD VEHICLE & DUST 0 0.03 0 0AGRICULTURAL SMOKE 0.01 0.07 0 0.41 0.07 0.18SEA SALT & SOIL DUST 0 0.11 0.05 0.07 1 1
All Days March-October 1989-1999
Low Smoke C/SO4 < 4
No Large Local Fires C/SO4 < 6
9
What is the temporal structure of Asian What is the temporal structure of Asian transport?transport?
• “SPRING” research model:– Based on data from Mauna Loa– Subsequent field studies have focused on spring
sampling
• “EPISODIC” research model:– A priori assumption based on experience with Asian
“Yellow Sand” dust storms– Bolstered by “mass = event” logic in studying Asian
outflow gas and aerosol chemistry and transport meteorology
– Reinforced by conservative receptor analyses (e.g. cluster analysis of 1998 dust storm)
• An unbiased measurement: – Continuous sampling during ITCT-2K2
11
Trinidad Head Aerosol Time Series - ITCT-2K2Trinidad Head Aerosol Time Series - ITCT-2K2
4/21 - 4/24
VanCuren et al., 2004
12
Trinity Alps Aerosol Time Series - ITCT-2K2Trinity Alps Aerosol Time Series - ITCT-2K2
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
X-R
ay M
ass
ng /
m3
10 - 5 um5 - 2.5 um2.5 - 1.1 um1.1 - .75 um.75 - .54 um.54 - .34 um.34 - .24 um.24 - .09 um
Trinity
4/1
4/2
002
4/2
1/2
002
4/2
8/2
002
5/5
/2002
5/1
2/2
002
5/1
9/2
002-10
0
10
20
PC
Score
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
ng /
m3
PC1Total ClTotal Si
4/21 - 4/24
VanCuren et al., 2004
13
Mt. Lassen Aerosol Time Series - ITCT-2K2Mt. Lassen Aerosol Time Series - ITCT-2K2
0
2000
4000
6000
X-R
ay M
ass
ng
/ m
3
10 - 5 um5 - 2.5 um2.5 -1.1 um1.1 - .75 um.75 - .54 um.54 - .34 um.34 - .24 um.24 - .09 um
Lassen
4/1
4/2
002
4/2
1/2
002
4/2
8/2
002
5/5
/2002
5/1
2/2
002
5/1
9/2
002-10
0
10
20
PC
Sco
re
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
ng
/ m
3
PC1Total ClTotal Si
4/21 - 4/24
VanCuren et al., 2004
14
ConcordantConcordant Montane Montane Aerosol:Aerosol:
Single dominant aerosol
Asian origin confirmed by soil element profiles
Concentration varies but continuously present
0 2000 4000 6000 8000TOTAL X-RAY MASS ng
-10
-5
-0
510
1520
PC
1
LASSEN
0 2000 4000 6000 8000TOTAL X-RAY MASS ng
-10-5-05
101520
PC
1
TRINITY
4/14 4/21 4/28 5/5 5/12 5/19 5/26
-10
0
10
20
PC
Sco
re
LASSENTRINITY
VanCuren et al., 2004
15
Asian aerosol persists even after rain Asian aerosol persists even after rain
VanCuren et al., 2004
Trinity Max
Lassen Max
16
Observational FindingsObservational Findings
• Asian Continental Aerosol Plume is persistent over western North America; detectable Alaska to Virgin Islands
• Average concentration is about 5 g/m3 PM10• Mass median diameter is 2-3 m• Average PM2.5 concentration is about 3 g/m3 • 1/2 of coarse, 3/4 of fines at CRLA & LAVO• Approximately ¼ of the new annual California AAQS
for PM10 and PM2.5• Approximately 1/10 of the new Federal annual PM10
NAAQS; 1/5 of the annual PM2.5 NAAQS• Asian aerosols are the regional “clean” background
in much of North America
17
Modeling Western U.S. PM Air QualityModeling Western U.S. PM Air QualityFailure Modes: Estimation Error and Process ErrorFailure Modes: Estimation Error and Process Error
YOSE SO4
PINN SO4
Expected uncertainty in regional models.
Systematic divergence between
model and reality.
18
Process error may be widespread:Process error may be widespread:Colorado Plateau fine soilColorado Plateau fine soil
GRBA BRCA MOZI
BRCA GRCA CANY
WEMI MEVE GRSA
19
Regional Aerosol Events are not Resolved by Regional Aerosol Events are not Resolved by CMAQ:CMAQ:
Feb 24, 1996 (Day 55)Feb 24, 1996 (Day 55)
20
Regional Aerosol Chemistry:Regional Aerosol Chemistry:Feb 21 & 24, 1996Feb 21 & 24, 1996
RE
DW
1
PO
RE
1
CR
LA
1
MO
RA
1
TH
SI1
LA
VO
1
SN
PA
1
PIN
N1
CO
RI1
BL
IS1
SO
LA
1
YO
SE
1
SE
QU
1
SA
GO
1
DE
VA
1
JA
RB
1
SA
WT
1
GR
BA
1
SA
LM
1
GL
AC
1
CR
MO
1
SC
OV
1
BR
CA
1
GR
CA
1
ING
A1
LO
PE
1
TO
NT
1
SA
GU
1
YE
LL
1
CA
NY
1
BR
ID1
PE
FO
1
CH
IR1
ME
VE
1
GIL
A1
WE
MI1
WH
RI1
MO
ZI1
BA
ND
1
RO
MO
1
RO
MO
2
GR
SA
1
GU
MO
1
BIB
E1
BA
DL
1
0.1
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
46
2346
2346
2346
2346
2346
23468
ng
/m3
MCMFIMPROVE_SOILSO4SEPB
2/24/962/21/96
21
Uncertainties in Modeling Uncertainties in Modeling Asian Impact on U.S. PMAsian Impact on U.S. PM
• Asian Emissions - timing and location– Desert dust (Takla Makan & Gobi)– Anthropogenic dust (Loess Plateau)– Urban / Industrial / Transportation Sources
• Global Transport - meteorology and process– Spatial resolution– Aerosol processing
• N.A. Regional Transport - emissions and meteorology– Source location and activity– Wind fields– Rough terrain
22
ConclusionsConclusions
• Asian aerosol is a dominant component of the “regional background” for rural PM in the Western U.S.
• The Asian “background” concentration is highly variable.
• Parsing the Asian aerosol flux into an “Airshed” model requires more than setting “boundary conditions.”
• Past contributions of Asian PM are a source of significant error in retrospective modeling.
• Projections of future “background” PM must include scenarios for Asian economic growth and evolving emission control programs.