1 the ewing public schools 2011-12 overview of nclb results presented by dr. danita ishibashi...

33
1 The Ewing Public Schools 2011-12 Overview of NCLB Results presented by Dr. Danita Ishibashi Assistant Superintendent

Upload: robin-cockett

Post on 14-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

1

The Ewing Public Schools

2011-12

Overview of NCLB Resultspresented by

Dr. Danita Ishibashi

Assistant Superintendent

2

Public Presentation of the Formal Report on NCLB

Submitted to the Board on

November 26, 2012

What Is Our Status?

All Ewing Public Schools are

Non-Categorized

Revised NCLB Waiver

The State of New Jersey was awarded an NCLB waiver in the spring of 2012. The revised NCLB waiver:

Redefines a new Accountability Metric (Priority, Focus, Reward and Non-Categorized Schools)

Revises ‘School Score Card’ to a new Performance Report

Transitions from AYP/Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) to Performance Targets

Utilizes Growth Model to define student progress

Creates new data collection and analysis systems

Accountability Metric

The NCLB Waiver categorizes schools as:

Priority FocusReward

Non-Categorized

Accountability Metric

Priority Schools:

The lowest performing schools across the State with regard to absolute achievement or graduation outcomes (<60%) and those that are persistently low achieving (approximately 75 across the State)

Focus Schools:

The schools who demonstrate large within-district variance in between the highest and lowest performing subgroups

Accountability MetricReward Schools:

Recognizes, celebrates and rewards schools with high overall and subgroup achievement levels and those that are demonstrating great progress

Non-Categorized Schools:

Schools who do not fall into the other categories

Performance Targets

The revised NCLB waiver transitions fromAnnual Measurable Targets toPerformance Targets:

Equal annual increments are established, reducing by 50% the

partially-proficient students in 6 years with 2011 results serving as baseline data

Performance Targets

Equal increments are established by:

English Language Arts and MathSchoolDistrictStateSubgroups

Performance Target

Established the Statewide goal of:

95% Participation Rate

90% Attendance Rate

90% Performance Target (95% in 2015)

Sample AMO TablePROCESS: DETERMINING SIX-YEAR GOALS

SubjectSub

Population

2011 Partially

Proficient

2011 Partially

Proficient divided by

2

Current 2011 %

Proficient

Annual Equal

Increments

2012 P%

Target

2013 P%

Target

2014 P%

Target

2015 P%

Target

2016 P%

Target

2017 P%

Target

ELA T 15 7.5 85 1.25 86.3 87.5 88.8 90.0 91.3 92.5

ELA SE 44 22 56 3.67 59.7 63.3 67.0 70.7 74.3 78

ELA EC 16 8 84 1.33 85.3 86.7 88.0 89.3 90.7 92

ELA LEP 25 12.5 75 2.08 77.1 79.2 81.3 83.3 85.4 87.5

ELA W 5 2.5 95 0.42 95.4 95.8 96.3 96.7 97.1 97.5

ELA B 15 7.5 85 1.25 86.3 87.5 88.8 90.0 91.3 92.5

ELA H 22 11 78 1.83 79.8 81.7 83.5 85.3 87.2 89

ELA A 0 0 100 0.00 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100

ELA N 100 50 0 8.33 8.3 16.7 25.0 33.3 41.7 50

ELA O 33 16.5 67 2.75 69.8 72.5 75.3 78.0 80.8 83.5

Sample Data

SubjectSubject ELAELA

Sub Population Schoolwide

2011 Proficient 56

2011 Partially Proficient 44

2011 Partially Proficient divided by 2 22

Current 2011 % Proficient 56

Annual Equal Increments 3.67

2012 P% Target 59.67

2012 Result 57.67

Meet Target NO

2013 P% Target 63.34

Performance Determination

Met Performance Goal of 90%MET GOAL

YES

YES*

NO

Met Progress Target

Met Progress Target (Confidence Interval applied)

Missed Progress Target

14

Good News

Ewing High School

English Language Arts Exceeded the 90% State Performance Target

Subgroups: Schoolwide, White, African American and

Economically Disadvantaged

15

Good News

Students with DisabilitiesExceeded

Performance Targets at the Elementary Schools

16

Good News

Antheil, Lore and Parkway Elementary Schools

Exceeded their 2012-13 Performance Targets in all subgroups across English

Language Arts and Mathematics

Good News

Math scores continue to increase across the district

Elementary schools’ Mathematics scores exceed/meet English Language Arts scores in all subgroups

District Overview by Building

19

Parkway Elementary School

Language Arts

Exceeded/Met Performance Target in all subgroups

Mathematics

Exceeded/Met Performance Target in all subgroups

20

Parkway Elementary SchoolEnglish Language Arts

Total Students increased 4.6%

White Students decreased 3%

African-American Students increased 5.7%

Hispanic Students increased 15.5%

Students with Disabilities increased 11.8%

Economically Disadvantaged Students increased 5.3%

Mathematics

Total Students increased 8.5%

White Students increased 4.6%

African-American Students increased 10.7%

Hispanic Students increased 10.5%

Students with Disabilities increased 10.8%

Economically Disadvantaged Students increased 8.5%

21

Lore Elementary School

Language Arts

Exceeded/Met Performance Target in all subgroups

Mathematics

Exceeded/Met Performance Target in all subgroups

22

Lore Elementary School

English Language Arts

Total Students increased 11%

White Students increased 4%

African-American Students increased 9.9%

Students with Disabilities increased 9.3%

Economically Disadvantaged Students increased 17.7%

Mathematics

Total Students increased 13.5%

White Students increased 6.6%

African-American Students increased 14.7%

Students with Disabilities increased 5.6%

Economically Disadvantaged Students increased 21.2%

23

Antheil Elementary School

Language Arts

Exceeded/Met Performance Target in all subgroups

Mathematics

Exceeded/Met Performance Target in all subgroups

24

Antheil Elementary School

English Language Arts

Total Students increased 6%

White Students increased 6.4%

African-American Students increased 6.5%

Students with Disabilities increased 5.9%

Economically Disadvantaged Students increased 10%

Mathematics

Total Students increased 18.8%

White Students increased 16.4%

African-American Students increased 21.4%

Students with Disabilities increased 24.4%

Economically Disadvantaged Students increased 24.6%

25

Fisher Middle School

Language Arts

Met* Performance Target, White, Hispanic, Asiansubgroups

Did not meet Performance Target Schoolwide, African American, Students with Disabilities and Economically Disadvantaged

Mathematics

Demonstrated growth across White, Hispanic, Asian subgroups

Students with Disabilities did not meet the Performance Target

26

Fisher Middle SchoolEnglish Language Arts

Total Students decreased 3.3%

White Students decreased 1.9%

African-American Students decreased 1.6%

Hispanic Students increased 3.9%

Students with Disabilities decreased 1.9%

Economically Disadvantaged Students decreased 3%

Mathematics

Total Students increased 1%

White Students increased 4.4%

African-American Students increased .4%

Hispanic Students increased 2%

Students with Disabilities decreased .3%

Economical Disadvantaged Students increased .5%

27

Ewing High School

Language Arts

Exceeded/Met Performance Target in all subgroups

Mathematics

Demonstrated growth across most subgroups

Students with Disabilities did not meet the Performance Target

28

Ewing High School

English Language Arts

Total Students increased 3%

White Students increased 4%

African-American Students increased 3%

Students with Disabilities increased 1.5%

Economically Disadvantaged Students increased 6.5%

Mathematics

Total Students increased 1%

White Students increased 2%

African-American Students increased 3%

Next Steps 2012-13

District Focus includes:New Common Core Standards in English

Language Arts and MathematicsTeaching and LearningTeacher Evaluation SystemUsing data to inform instructionClosing the achievement gapStudent Success in MathematicsStudent Success in Language ArtsFisher Middle School

Next Steps 2012-13All district and building level school improvement plans addressmath curriculum and instruction concerns and the achievementgap

School Professional Development (SPDC - all 5 buildings) Local Professional Development (LPDC - district) Title I (elementary schools) CAPA Recommendations SIA Recommendations Curriculum and Achievement Gap recommendations

Offer professional development aligned with all district and buildinglevel school improvement plans with a focus on the Common CoreStandards in English Language Arts and Mathematics

Establish common benchmark assessments and data analysis processes in all content areas

Priority #1 Student Success in Mathematics

Targeted Subgroups

Total Population African AmericanStudents with DisabilitiesEconomically Disadvantaged

Priority #1Student Success in Mathematics

SMART Goals

• Eighty percent of kindergarten-second grade students will show a 10% increase in grade level benchmark assessments in Number Sense and Numerical Operations by the end of the 2012-13 school year as measured by pre- and post-assessments which are specific to each grade level

• To increase students’ achievement on the NJ ASK 3-8, HSPA Math by 10%, or meet Performance Targets across Total Population (Grades 3-8, 11), African-American (Grades 3-8, 11), Economically Disadvantaged (Grades 3-8, 11) Students with Disabilities (Grades 3-8, 11)

Questions?