1. the gooduep project: findings eair forum, vilnius, august 2009 paul temple centre for higher...

10
1

Upload: archibald-cummings

Post on 03-Jan-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1. the GOODUEP project: findings EAIR Forum, Vilnius, August 2009 Paul Temple Centre for Higher Education Studies

1

Page 2: 1. the GOODUEP project: findings EAIR Forum, Vilnius, August 2009 Paul Temple Centre for Higher Education Studies

the GOODUEP project:findings

EAIR Forum, Vilnius, August 2009

Paul Temple

Centre forHigher Education Studies

Page 3: 1. the GOODUEP project: findings EAIR Forum, Vilnius, August 2009 Paul Temple Centre for Higher Education Studies

3

the GOODUEP project

Project co-funded by the European Commission, DG/EAC

Objectives of the project: To map university/enterprise partnerships (UEPs) in 18 universities

in 6 European countries To analyse structures and governance of UEPs To identify success factors and examples of good practice

What kind of UEPs? All types of higher education institutions All type of business (public or private sector) All type of partnerships (high-level labs to sports facilities)

Page 4: 1. the GOODUEP project: findings EAIR Forum, Vilnius, August 2009 Paul Temple Centre for Higher Education Studies

4

levels of analysis

1 National level 6 countries: Germany, Spain, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, UK Desk research:

2 Institutional level 18 universities Empirical research

3 Partnership level 10 selected cases of good practices In-depth empirical research

4

Page 5: 1. the GOODUEP project: findings EAIR Forum, Vilnius, August 2009 Paul Temple Centre for Higher Education Studies

5

different national contexts: % of GDP spent on R&D, by source

5

Source: OECD, Main Science and Technology Indicators, 2007

Page 6: 1. the GOODUEP project: findings EAIR Forum, Vilnius, August 2009 Paul Temple Centre for Higher Education Studies

6

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

Pat

ents

per

mil

lio

n p

op

ula

tio

n

EPO patents 311,7 244,3 121,4 128 87,3 30,6 4,2

USPTO patents 129,8 84,2 50,6 52,2 30,8 6,5 0,6

Triad patents 53,8 47,4 15,8 20,8 8,3 2,7 0,2

DE NL UK EU IT ES PL

…which produce different outcomes

Page 7: 1. the GOODUEP project: findings EAIR Forum, Vilnius, August 2009 Paul Temple Centre for Higher Education Studies

7

provisional conclusions

• an enormous diversity of UEPs across Europe: an increasingly important university activity everywhere

• different approaches reflect contexts and policies (national, regional, institutional)

• key role of institutional governance: where very closely regulated, “shortcuts” in managing UEPs are apparent

• funding: financial incentives for the institution, financial or non-financial incentives for staff

• people: academic entrepreneurs, networks

Page 8: 1. the GOODUEP project: findings EAIR Forum, Vilnius, August 2009 Paul Temple Centre for Higher Education Studies

8

“embeddedness”

Mode 1

weak strong extent of organisational embeddedness

nature of knowledge transfer

Page 9: 1. the GOODUEP project: findings EAIR Forum, Vilnius, August 2009 Paul Temple Centre for Higher Education Studies

9

some policy implications

• create institutional processes which allow departments to embed the knowledge benefits of UEPs

• allow individuals to derive financial/other benefits from working on UEPs

• this may involve legal changes to facilitate UEP formation

Page 10: 1. the GOODUEP project: findings EAIR Forum, Vilnius, August 2009 Paul Temple Centre for Higher Education Studies

10

thank you for listening:

find out more at www.gooduep.eu

Institute of EducationUniversity of London20 Bedford WayLondon WC1H 0AL

Tel +44 (0)20 7612 6000Fax +44 (0)20 7612 6126Email [email protected] www.ioe.ac.uk