1 the intercomparison of tropical tropospheric compositions measured from satellite jae kim 1,...

22
1 The intercomparison of tropical tropospheric compositions measu red from satellite Jae Kim 1 , Somyoung Kim 1 , and M. J. Newchurch 2 1: Pusan National Univ, Korea 2: University of Alabama in Huntsville, USA

Upload: peter-lloyd

Post on 12-Jan-2016

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 The intercomparison of tropical tropospheric compositions measured from satellite Jae Kim 1, Somyoung Kim 1, and M. J. Newchurch 2 1: Pusan National

1

The intercomparison of tropical tropospheric compositions measured from satellite

Jae Kim1, Somyoung Kim1, and M. J. Newchurch2

1: Pusan National Univ, Korea

2: University of Alabama in Huntsville, USA

Page 2: 1 The intercomparison of tropical tropospheric compositions measured from satellite Jae Kim 1, Somyoung Kim 1, and M. J. Newchurch 2 1: Pusan National

2

Contents

1. Cloud-induced OMI total ozone error and its impact on tropospheric ozone

2. Empirical Orthogonal Function (EOF) method for evaluating satellite products

Page 3: 1 The intercomparison of tropical tropospheric compositions measured from satellite Jae Kim 1, Somyoung Kim 1, and M. J. Newchurch 2 1: Pusan National

3

Cloud-induced OMI total ozone error and its impact on tropospheric ozone

Page 4: 1 The intercomparison of tropical tropospheric compositions measured from satellite Jae Kim 1, Somyoung Kim 1, and M. J. Newchurch 2 1: Pusan National

4

OMI-MLS tropospheric ozone map March

April September

May

August

October

Page 5: 1 The intercomparison of tropical tropospheric compositions measured from satellite Jae Kim 1, Somyoung Kim 1, and M. J. Newchurch 2 1: Pusan National

5

OMI reflectivity

OMI total ozone

MODIS cloud fraction

Ozone hole

Marine stratocumulus regions

Convective cloudy regions

Ozone fountain

Page 6: 1 The intercomparison of tropical tropospheric compositions measured from satellite Jae Kim 1, Somyoung Kim 1, and M. J. Newchurch 2 1: Pusan National

6

OMI total O3 (all) – total O3 (clear)

Jan (2005.01-2007.12) Feb (2005.01-2007.12)

Mar (2005.01-2007.12) April (2005.01-2007.12)

Page 7: 1 The intercomparison of tropical tropospheric compositions measured from satellite Jae Kim 1, Somyoung Kim 1, and M. J. Newchurch 2 1: Pusan National

7

May (2005.01-2007.12) Jun (2005.01-2007.12)

Jul (2005.01-2007.12) Aug (2005.01-2007.12)

OMI total O3 (all) – total O3 (clear)

Page 8: 1 The intercomparison of tropical tropospheric compositions measured from satellite Jae Kim 1, Somyoung Kim 1, and M. J. Newchurch 2 1: Pusan National

8

Sep (2005.01-2007.12) Oct (2005.01-2007.12)

Nov (2005.01-2007.12)

Dec (2005.01-2007.12)

OMI total O3 (all) – total O3 (clear)

Page 9: 1 The intercomparison of tropical tropospheric compositions measured from satellite Jae Kim 1, Somyoung Kim 1, and M. J. Newchurch 2 1: Pusan National

9

OMI-MLS tropospheric ozone before and after correction for cloud

Dec

Jan

April

Page 10: 1 The intercomparison of tropical tropospheric compositions measured from satellite Jae Kim 1, Somyoung Kim 1, and M. J. Newchurch 2 1: Pusan National

10

OMI-MLS tropospheric ozone before and after correction for cloud

Aug

Sep

Oct

Page 11: 1 The intercomparison of tropical tropospheric compositions measured from satellite Jae Kim 1, Somyoung Kim 1, and M. J. Newchurch 2 1: Pusan National

11

Tried to evaluate satellite product quantitatively by calculating correlation, STD, etc. with ground-based measurements and other satellite product. However, there is limitation in spatial and temporal coverage for ground-based data, and we don’t know how good the other satellite product is.

Seek a different point of view in evaluating satellite products qualitatively by answering to the question: “Are satellite products self-consistent in chemical and dynamical point of view?

Accomplish this objective by analyzing the spatial-temporal pattern of satellite products with the statistical tool, Empirical Orthogonal Function (EOF).

The EOF method is the method of choice for analyzing the variability of a single filed. The method finds the spatial patterns of variability, their time variation, and gives a measure of the “importance” of each field.

2. Empirical orthogonal function (EOF) method for evaluating satellite products

Page 12: 1 The intercomparison of tropical tropospheric compositions measured from satellite Jae Kim 1, Somyoung Kim 1, and M. J. Newchurch 2 1: Pusan National

12

Page 13: 1 The intercomparison of tropical tropospheric compositions measured from satellite Jae Kim 1, Somyoung Kim 1, and M. J. Newchurch 2 1: Pusan National

13

EOF for test 1 case

Spatial pattern; Blue: negative, red:positive value

Time series; Principle Component

Page 14: 1 The intercomparison of tropical tropospheric compositions measured from satellite Jae Kim 1, Somyoung Kim 1, and M. J. Newchurch 2 1: Pusan National

14

Cloud fraction EOF mode 1

ATSR fire EOFMODIS AOD EOF

OMI NO2 EOF

MOPITT CO EOF

Page 15: 1 The intercomparison of tropical tropospheric compositions measured from satellite Jae Kim 1, Somyoung Kim 1, and M. J. Newchurch 2 1: Pusan National

15

OMI-MLS tropospheric O3 EOF

SAM tropospheric O3 EOF

TES tropospheric O3 EOF

GOME tropospheric O3 EOF

Page 16: 1 The intercomparison of tropical tropospheric compositions measured from satellite Jae Kim 1, Somyoung Kim 1, and M. J. Newchurch 2 1: Pusan National

16

OMI-MLS tropospheric O3 EOF

SAM tropospheric O3 EOF

TES tropospheric O3 EOF

GOME tropospheric O3 EOF

Page 17: 1 The intercomparison of tropical tropospheric compositions measured from satellite Jae Kim 1, Somyoung Kim 1, and M. J. Newchurch 2 1: Pusan National

17

SAM is not available in latitude higher than 20º

GOME tropo O3 EOFTES tropos O3 EOF OMI-MLS tropo O3 EOF

Page 18: 1 The intercomparison of tropical tropospheric compositions measured from satellite Jae Kim 1, Somyoung Kim 1, and M. J. Newchurch 2 1: Pusan National

18

Cloud fraction EOF mode 1 OMI-MLS EOF mode 2

Page 19: 1 The intercomparison of tropical tropospheric compositions measured from satellite Jae Kim 1, Somyoung Kim 1, and M. J. Newchurch 2 1: Pusan National

19

OMI-MLS over western Pacific Ocean

mode 1 mode 2

OMI-MLS over central Pacific Ocean

mode 1 mode 2

GOME tropo O3 over western Pacific Ocean

mode 1 mode 2

GOME tropo O3 over central Pacific Ocean

mode 1 mode 2

Page 20: 1 The intercomparison of tropical tropospheric compositions measured from satellite Jae Kim 1, Somyoung Kim 1, and M. J. Newchurch 2 1: Pusan National

20

GOME tropo O3 over W. Pacific mode 3 GOME tropo O3 over C. Pacific mode 3

OMI-MLS tropo O3 over W. Pacific mode 3 OMI-MLS tropo O3 over C. Pacific mode 3

Page 21: 1 The intercomparison of tropical tropospheric compositions measured from satellite Jae Kim 1, Somyoung Kim 1, and M. J. Newchurch 2 1: Pusan National

21

Camp et al. (2003, JGR)

Page 22: 1 The intercomparison of tropical tropospheric compositions measured from satellite Jae Kim 1, Somyoung Kim 1, and M. J. Newchurch 2 1: Pusan National

22

Summary

1. OMI total ozone appears to have cloud related error. We found total ozone is overestimated over marine stratocumulus cloud and underestimated over convective cloud. This leads discontinuous tropospheric ozone distribution between ocean and continent.

2. Empirical Orthogonal Function (EOF) method can be effectively used to evaluate satellite products qualitatively.