1 topic 7: biogeochemistry – anaerobic respirations overview anaerobic respirations of inorganic...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Topic 7: BioGeoChemistry – Anaerobic Respirations
Overview
Anaerobic respirations of inorganic electron acceptors
Aerobic oxidation of the endproducts of anaerobic
respirations
Cycles (C, N, S, Fe)
Industrially and environmentally relevant reactions
2
Topic 7: BioGeoChemistry – Anaerobic Respirations
Examples of Examinable Material (will need own
complementation of knowledge gaps from internet)
The processes:
•Sulfate reduction, oxidation of sulfur/sulfides
•Nitrate reduction (denitrification), nitrification
•CO2 reduction (methanogenesis), methane oxidation
•Iron reduction (Geobacter), Iron oxidation
•Any others?
•Ecological role of the processes
•Economic, commercial, applied role of the processes
•Reaction, Organism,
3H+
CO2 + H2O <--> H2CO3<--> HCO3- <--> CO3
2-
H+
CO2 + H2O CH2O + O2
Electron donor: H2O (the oxygen atom)
Oxidation state from -II 0 Electron acceptor:
CO2 (the C atom) Oxidation state from +4 0 Reaction is endergonic. How does it work? Light energy to drive reaction “uphill” Terrestrial plants and marine microalgae
Simple carbon cycle R1: Photosynthesis
4
CH2O + O2 CO2 + H2O + new biomassElectron donor: organic carbon
Electron acceptor: O2
Exergonic, releasing energy (ATP) for growth
Reactions stoichiometrically reverts photosynthesis.
For mature ecosystems (e.g. rain forest) respiration balances exactly photosynthetic activity
Sustained Net O2 production (or CO2 consumption) needs
deposition of organics
Simple Carbon cycle R2: Respiration
Role of Bacteria in NatureCO2
CH2O O2
H2O
Electron AcceptorElectron
Donor
Energy
Oxygen cycle and simplified carbon cycle
More complex carbon cycle also involves:• Methane cycle• Anaerobic respirations
7
How Can Life without Oxygen Work?
O2 = principal electron acceptor of aerobic life.
Without O2 a different e- acceptor needs to be found.
Fermentations (e.g. lactic, ethanolic) have used internally
created e- acceptors for no gain in ATP (no respiration).
Now we will deal with e-acceptors that allow ATP
generation via respiration (ETC, proton gradient, ATP-
synthase)
Bacteria are the only life forms capable of using electron
acceptors other than O2 (anaerobic respiration).
The use of alternative electron acceptors dramatically
changes the chemistry of the environment
8
What are the Typical Electron Accepting Reactions?
O2 + H2O (aerobic respiration)
4e-
SO42- + H2S (sulfate reducing bacteria)
8e-
Fe3+ + Fe2+ (iron reducing bacteria)
1e-
9
What are the Typical Electron Accepting Reactions?
S + H2S (sulfur reducing bacteria)
2e-
NO3- + N2 (denitrifying bacteria)
5e-
NO3- + NH3 (nitrate ammonification)
8e-
CO2 + 8e- CH4 (methane producing bacteria)
10
What are the Typical Electron Accepting Reactions?
O2 + 4e- H2O (aerobic respiration)
SO42- + 8e- H2S (sulfate reducing bacteria)
Fe3+ + 1e- Fe2+ (iron reducing bacteria)
S + 2e- H2S (sulfur reducing bacteria)
NO3- + 5e- N2 (denitrifying bacteria)
NO3- + 8e- NH3 (nitrate ammonification)
CO2 + 8e- CH4 (methane producing bacteria)
11
What Happens with the Electron Acceptors after Accepting Electrons?
By accepting electrons, the acceptors they turn into
reduced species.
Reduced species are reducing agents that dramatically
change the chemistry of the environment
If in contact with O2 , reduced species can become electron
donors for specialised lithotrophic bacteria
The continued cycle of electron acceptors to reduced
species and back to electron acceptors is a typical part of
biogeochemical cycling.
The S, N, Fe cycle are typical examples.
12
Classification of Microbial Metabolic Types
Examples:
Algae: Photo-Litho-Autotroph,
Bacteria, Fish: Chemo-organo-heterotroph
Thiobacillus: Chemo-litho-autotroph
Photosynthetic bacteria: Photo-Organo-heterotroph
Our focus : Anaerobic Heterotophs and Aerobic
lithotrophs
Energy type Photo Chemo
Electron donor Organo Litho
Carbon source Hetero Auto
Electron acceptor Aerobic Anaerobic
13
Life without O2: Alternative Electron Acceptors 1
Electron Acceptors Measure for Energy Released with H2 as Electron Donor (log K)
O2 H2O 21 NO3
- N2 21
NO3- NH4- 15
Fe3+ Fe2+ 8
SO42- H2S 5
So H2S 3
CO2 CH4 2
CO2 Acetate ?
HumOx HumRed ? adapted from Stumm & Morgan
Observation: There is a sequence of use of electron acceptors which is according to the energetic usefulness (redox potential) O2 , nitrate, humic acids, ferric iron, sulfate, CO2
14
15
Electron Acceptors are Reduced and can become e- Donors
Electron Donors Electron Acceptors
organic O2 H2O
H2S So NO3- N2
So SO42- NO3- NH4
+
Fe2+ Fe3+ Fe3+ Fe2+
NO2- NO3- SO42- H2S
H2 H+ So H2S
CO CO2 CO2 Acetate
NH4 NO2- CO2 CH4
HumR HumOx HumOx HumR
16
Interconnection Between Different Electron Donors and Acceptors
Electron Donors
H2 H+
CH4 CO2
H2S So
So SO42-
Fe2+ Fe3+
NO2- NO3-
Electron Acceptors
CO2 CH4
So H2S
SO42- H2S
Fe3+ Fe2+
NO3- NH4
NO3- N2
O2 H2O
Simple Sulfur cycle
18
Competition for Electron Donor by Different Acceptor Systems
General observations with anaerobic respirations:
Threshold level for minimum degradable substrate concentrations decreases with the redox potential of the electron acceptor
CO2 CH4
SO4 2- H2S
NO3- NH4+
H2
Time
Using H2 as a model substrate(accounting for about 30 % of energy flow in anoxic environments):
Organisms with more “powerful” electron acceptor out-compete others by keeping the H2 concentration below “detection limit” of competitors.
This explains the apparent preference for using best electron acceptors (most positive redox potential) first.
What is the relationship between substrate concentration (S) and its uptake rate (v) ?
Effect of threshold (e.g. H2) because of back-reaction)
v = vmax -------kMS +S
v(h-1)
S (g/L)
substratelimitation
kM
vmax(h-1)
How does the threshold for electron donor (e.g. H2) affect the kinetics of uptake rate (not growth rate)?
Growth- Michaelis Menten model
And 1919
µ(h-1)
S(g/L)
The negative specific growth rate (µ) observed in the absence of substrate(when S = 0) (cells are starving, causing loss of biomass over time)
is the decay rate mS*Ymax
- mS*Ymax
0
Effect of Maintenance Coefficient (mS) on growth Rate
And 2020
21
22
Sulfate Reduction (SRB)
Sulfate is a suitable and abundant alternative electron acceptor
Typical reactions:4 H2 + SO4
2- + H+ HS- + 4 H2O
CH3-COO- + SO42- HS- + 2 HCO3-
Organisms: Sulfate Reducing Bacteria (SRB), strictly anaerobes, Desulfovibrio, Desulfobacter, etc.
Electron donors: small molecules (breakdown products from fermentations, or geologically formed, e.g. H2, acetate, organic acids, alcohols)
Reduce also elemental sulfur, sulfite and thiosulfate to H2S
Ubiquitous
23
Bacterial Sulfate Reduction When Does it Occur ?
In the presence of organic substances , after depletion of oxygen nitrate
and ferric iron sulfate reduction is next
Initially in sediments, Rates from 0.01 to 10 mM/day
Typically in sediments but also on surfaces (ships) underneath biofilms
Within flocs or intestines of marine animals
Sulfide reacts chemically as a reducing agent (e.g. with O2 or Fe3+)
elemental sulfur formation
Formation of FeS and FeS2 black color of sediment
In typical reduced sediments (e.g. mangroves, estuaries SR may be
higher than O2 use)
Thiosulfate disproportionation (SO32-) into sulfate and sulfide
24
Dissimilatory Sulfate Reduction by SRB
Organisms: Sulfate Reducing Bacteria (SRB), strictly anaerobe
Desulfovibrio, Desulfobacter, etc.
Use of small compounds (H2, acetate, other organic acids alcohols but
not polymers, proteins, carbohydrates, fats)
Cooperation with fermentative bacteria needed to degrade detritus
End product sulfide (H2S HS- + H+) is toxic, reactive, explosive
Typical reactions:
4 H2 + SO42- + H+ HS- + 4 H2O
CH3-COO- + SO42- HS- + 2 HCO3-
Reduce also elemental sulfur, sulfite and thiosulfate to H2S
25
SRB Significance in Marine Environments
Ecologically:
playing a major role in sulfur cycle and sediment activities
sulfide = O2 scavenger “negative oxygen concentration”
responsible for sulfur deposits (H2S + O2 S + H2O)
P-release from sediments
Economically:
End product H2S: poisonous, explosive, corrosive, malodorous
Corrosion of submersed steel structures (e.g. platforms, bridges)
Corrosion of oil pipelines (inside and outside)
Lethal gas emissions on offshore platforms
Petroleum degradation (burning sour gas: H2S + O2 SO2)
26
S-ox:
Volcanic Sulfur SpringsE.g. New ZealandYelllowstone National Park
27
SRB Morphology
Typical shape of sulfate reducing bacteria (SRB) of the type Desulfovibrio.
28
SRB Role in Corrosion of Steel
Electrons on the steel surface produce stabilising H2 layerbacteria use H2 as the electron donor for sulfate reductionthis removes electrons and leaves the iron positively chargedThe positive charge favours the release of Fe2+ into solutionOngoing process causes corroding electron flow and weight lossBacteria feed on electricityCathodic protection
H2
e-
H+
SO42-
HS-
Fe2+
FeS
Steel Corrosion current
SRB
29
SRB Damage to Pipeline
Microbially influenced corrosion of marine oil pipeline showing typical pitting corrosion.
30
“SRB in Petroleum Industry” Research at Murdoch
Q: Where do SRB in oil pipelines come from?A: Mostly as a biofilm attached inside the pipes. Method SRB monitoring during pig runs.
Q: Are SRB supported by corrosion ?A: SRB can grow on corroding iron. Cathodic protection enhances their growth.
Q: Are treatments effective against SRB?A: SRB can degrade organic biocides.
31
Dissimilatory Nitrate Reducing Bacteria
Dentrification (nitrate to N2) typically involves the aerobic bacteria
Organic electron donor + NO3- N2
Bacteria use complex substrates
Further details in lecture on N-cycle
In sediments nitrate ammonification can play important role
Organic electron donor + NO3- NH3
Nitrate ammonification is due to anaerobic bacteria (e.g. SRB)
32
Dissimilatory Iron Reducing Bacteria
Organisms: Various anaerobic bacteria, no specific group
e.g. Geobacter
e- donors: mainly small compounds
Typical reaction:
H2 + 2 Fe3+ 2 Fe2+ + 2 H+
Reaction results in lowering of redox potential
Reduce also Manganese, elemental sulfur and other metals (e.g. uranium)
End product is magnetite (Fe3O4) and other compounds (black precipitates)
Significance of iron reduction is still being underestimated
Recent research: electricity production using ferric iron reducing bacteria
33
CO2 or HCO3- Reduction(Methane Producing Bacteria)
CO2 is even more abundant than sulfate but difficult to use
By Methane Producing Bacteria (Archeae)
Strictly anaerobic requiring a redox potential of less than -350mV
Highly oxygen sensitive:
4 H2 + HCO3- + H+ CH4 + 3 H2O
Very limited substrate spectrum (H2, acetate, methanol)
Syntrophic associations are formed with fermenting bacteria
Because of poor solubility (bubble formation) some methane from
sediments escapes into atmosphere (greenhouse gas) True
removal of BOD from water.
34
Aerobic Re-oxidation Processes 1 - Sulfide and Fe2+
Contact of reduced (black sediments) with O2 :
bacterial oxidation of sulfide and Fe2+ occurs.
Beggiatoa: 2 H2S + O2 2 S0 + H2O (white algae)
Thiobacillus: H2S + 2 O2 H2SO4 (sulfuric acid)
very low local pH values of <1.
Further microbial pipeline corrosion.
Also insoluble species are re-oxidized e.g. pyrite (FeS2)
bio-leaching of minerals).
Elemental sulfur is often produced as intermediate
(white precipitate (“white smoker”, “white algae”)
35
NH4+ oxidation is energetically difficult and slow and
requires oxygen as electron acceptor.
Organisms: Nitrosomonas, Nitrobacter, two step process.
NH4 uptake also possible by assimilation of phytoplankton.
Aerobic Re-oxidation Processes 2 - Ammonia
36
Fate of Sulfide in the Presence of Oxygen
Contact of reduced sulfide (H2S or FeS) with air spontaneous oxidation (H2S) to insoluble S
Microbial Oxidation:
(a) Beggiatoa: 2 H2S + O2 2 So + H2O (“white algae”)
(b) Thiobacillus: H2S + 2 O2 H2SO4 (sulfuric acid)
very low local pH values of <1. Further microbial pipeline corrosion.
Also insoluble species are re-oxidized e.g. pyrite (FeS2) (bio-leaching of minerals).
Elemental sulfur is often produced as intermediate (white precipitate (“white smoker”, “white algae”)
Together, sulfate reduction and sulfide oxidation can close the sulfur cycle.
37
O2
HS-
Microbial S conversion
Highest chemical and biological activity at the interface (presence of electron donors and acceptors)
NO3-
NH4+
H2 , CH4
high Eh
Low Eh
Fe3+
Fe 2+
Concentration
Depth
Sulfate
Sulfide
Brown
Black
Depth Profile of Aerobic Anaerobic Interface
38
Scheme of Ocean Hydrothermal Ventfrom Ocean Ridges
www.jamstec.go.jp/jamstec-e/ bio/subext/thergane.html
Extreme Life Conditions:Anaerobic, hydrogen drivenStrong temperature gradientsHigh pressureOrigin of life is thought to have been thermophilic, with H2 and So from volcanic
sources as e-donor and acceptor.
39
Sulfur Cycle at Hydrothermal Vents
SO42-
H2S
Biological oxidation
H2S + O2 S, SO4
2-
Geochemical Reduction
Similar principle in sewer pipes
40
“Black Smokers” releasing reduced sufur and iron (e.g. FeS) as potential electron donors for bacteria.
41
White “snowblower” producing suspended sulfur bacteria in snow flake type aggregates during a volcanic eruption
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute East Pacific Rise.
•S oxidising Bacteria as primary producers
42
Tubeworms (Riftia) living in association with sulfur oxidising bacteria
43
Tubeworms (Riftia) living in association with sulfur oxidising bacteria
Micheal Degruy
Dark food-chainIndependent of Sunlight ?
44
Deep-sea mussel Bathymodiolus thermophilus using symbiotic sulfur bacteria.
Photo by Richard A. LutzPhoto by Richard A. Lutz
45
Galatheid crabs lining a fissure at a hot vent on the East Pacific Rise feeding on sulfur bacteria.Courtesy Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
46
Tubeworms (Riftia) living in association with sulfur oxidising bacteria
47
Anaerobic Oxidation of Sulfide
There are principally two conditions allowing sulfur cycle in the absence of oxygen:
1. Presence of light and phototrophic bacteria:Very colorful, play a role in microbial matsCan use light that is not suitable for algaeGreen sulfur bacteria (S outside, Chlorobium)Purple sulfur bacteria (S inside, Chromatium)
2. Presence of other “powerful e-acceptors (e.g. nitrate, Fe3+) are available
Thiomargareta a recent discovery
48
Thiomargareta namibiensis
49
Nitratestorage
50
Thiomargareta namibiensis
51
CH4 is a highly energetic e-donor (fuel) in aerobic areas
With electron acceptors O2, Nitrate, Fe3+ methane canbe re-oxidized by methylotrophic bacteria
Recently evidence has been found of CH4 oxidation linked to sulfate reduction.
Those electron acceptors are usually made available by bioturbation,thus CH4 usually does not reach the water column
Where benthic macrofauna has been killed methane productionforms large CH4 bubbles that can escape the water column (does not occur in the open ocean)
Under pressure, methane forms hydrates on the ocean floor around continental shelfes. These hydrates can be used as electron donors for aerobic bacteria food chain.
Aerobic Re-oxidation Processes 2 - Methane
52
Gas Hydrate Molecules (dusk.geo.orst.edu/ oceans/lec14.html)
53
Methane hydrate mount under flashlight
54
Methane hydrate outcrop from continental shelfMethane hydrate outcrop from continental shelf.. approximately 250 miles east of Charleston, S.Capproximately 250 miles east of Charleston, S.C
courtesy Carolin Ruppelcourtesy Carolin Ruppel
55
Tubeworms (Riftia) living in association with sulfur oxidising bacteria
Micheal Degruy
“Chemosynthetic mussel from methane hydrate
Methane hydrate outcrop
Tube worms
56
Methane hydrate sample
57
Tubeworms (Riftia) living in association with sulfur oxidising bacteria
Micheal Degruy
“Chemosynthetic mussel from methane hydrate
Tubeworm collected from gas hydrate seepage areas
58
Tubeworms (Riftia) living in association with sulfur oxidising bacteria
Micheal Degruy
Spider crab looking for food between the tubeworms growing on a methane hydrate outcrop
59
Tubeworms (Riftia) living in association with sulfur oxidising bacteria
Micheal Degruy
“Chemosynthetic mussel from methane hydrate
Mussels with bacterial slime living on methane hydrate
60
Tubeworms (Riftia) living in association with sulfur oxidising bacteria
Micheal Degruy
“Chemosynthetic mussel from methane hydrate”
61
Tubeworms (Riftia) living in association with sulfur oxidising bacteria
Micheal Degruy
“Chemosynthetic mussel from methane hydrate“Iceworm” living on gas hydrate by
ustilising methylotophic
bacteria
NOAA: The Deep East Expedition – Blake Ridge
Photos from NOAA Alvin dive Sept. 23-28,2001National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
62
Tubeworms (Riftia) living in association with sulfur oxidising bacteria
Micheal Degruy
“Chemosynthetic mussel from methane hydrate
Methane hydratewith ice worms
63
Tubeworms (Riftia) living in association with sulfur oxidising bacteria
Micheal Degruy
“Chemosynthetic mussel from methane hydrate
64
Gas Hydrate at the Surface
Under Atmospheric Conditions: gas hydrate separates into flammable CH4 and water
(here cooling hands)
65
Example Locations of Gas Hydrate
66
67
Methane Hydrate (Summary)
Methane hydrate, a curiosity or a significant global phenomenon?
Needed for formation: low temperature and high pressure
Why are hydrates mainly on the continental shelfes ?
Deep oceans lack organic material High biologic productivity (CH4) Rapid sedimentation rates (bury the organic
matter)
68
BioLeaching
Example pyrite ore Fe2S or FeS (Fe2+ S2-)
OS or Fe= +2, of S -2, both are reduced Bacteria oxidise both Example microbe:
Thiobacillus thio-oxidans, Thiobacillus ferro-oxidans
Initial steps: Oxidise sulfur to S0 and Fe2+ to Fe3+
Secondary steps: S0 to H2SO4 (pH to 1)
Indirect leaching 2 Fe3+ + S2- 2 Fe2+ S0
69
Indirect Reactions
As shown from the indirect effect of oxising ores via Fe3+
Also other metal ions can be oxidised
Heapleaching
70
Tank-leaching
Example ores:ChalcopyriteArsenopyrite
Example Metals:Gold, coppyer, Zinc,
Cobalt
What is Microbial Fuel Cell?What is Microbial Fuel Cell?
Chemical Fuel Cell (e.g. H2 FC) Microbial Fuel Cell
Anode Cathode
External electric circuit e- e-
Electric current
H2 2e- + 2H+2H+ + 1/2O2 + 2e- H2O
Electrolyte
Anode Cathode
External electric circuit e- e-
Electric current
H2 2e- + 2H+2H+ + 1/2O2 + 2e- H2O
Electrolyte
Cation
Exchange M
embrane
Cathode
Anode
H+
2 Acetate
2 Acetyl-CoA (16 e-)
4 ATP 2 CoA
TCA Cycle
O CH CH2 C
CH3
O
n
PHB (18 e-)
CH3 C S CoA
O
2 CoA
8 NADH + H+
24 ATP
2 CO2
BiomassETC
OR
Medox
Medred.
ETC
- +
1 NADH + H+
Fe(CN)63-
Fe(CN)64-
e-
O2
H2O
e-
External Resistor
V
e-
e-
Cation
Exchange M
embrane
Cation
Exchange M
embrane
Cathode
Anode
H+
2 Acetate
2 Acetyl-CoA (16 e-)
4 ATP 2 CoA
TCA Cycle
O CH CH2 C
CH3
O
n
O CH CH2 C
CH3
O
O CH CH2 CO CH CH2 C
CH3
O
n
PHB (18 e-)
CH3 C S CoA
O
CH3 C S CoA
O
2 CoA
8 NADH + H+
24 ATP
2 CO2
BiomassETC
OR
Medox
Medred.
ETC
-- +++
1 NADH + H+
Fe(CN)63-
Fe(CN)64-
e-
O2
H2O
e-
External Resistor
V
e-
External Resistor
V
e-
External Resistor
V
e-
e-
Bacteria
Applications for Microbial Fuel Cell
• Powering monitoring devices in remote locations
• Powering electronic devices with renewable energy sources
• Self-feeding “Gastrobots”- (Air Force ‘SPIDERS’ Project)
• Converting astronaut waste to electricity (NASA)
• Decentralized domestic power source
• Novel sensing devices
• Conversion of waste organic matter to electricity instead of methane
• Conversion of renewable biomass to electricity instead of ethanol
• Bioremediation of contaminated environments (DOE-NABIR field trial)
• Powering automobiles - collaboration with Toyota
Microbial Fuel Cells for energy efficient Waste Water Treatment
• Research interests are gaining momentums (Bullen et al., 2006; Davis and Higson, 2006; Logan and Regan, 2006; Lovley, 2006; Rabaey and Verstraete, 2005)
• Energy and water supply are among the biggest challenges we will face in the future.
• Recovery of valuable resources such as water, energy and nutrients. Adapted from Logan et al., 2006
ES&T
Our MFC Research Focuses on:
• Sophisticated computer process control of MFC
• Highest power density in 2007• Sustainable operation of MFC process To
overcome the problems of non-sustainable operation of MFC (e.g. pH imbalance)
• Practical application of MFC to solve problems of other bio-process (e.g. Anaerobic Digestion)
Application of Computer for MFC Process Control
Signal In
Signal Out
Laboratory Scale of the PC-Controlled MFCSystem Control and Monitoring: LabVIEW™ 7.1 / National Instrument Data Acquisition Card
5 mm
Conductive Granular Graphite
Acknowledgement:
The Reactor was designed by Dr. Korneel Rabaey
(Advanced Wastewater Management Centre, The University of Queensland, Australia)
Plate 1.
Plate 2.
Plate 3.
Bio-Electrochemical device for the Potentiodynamic Study(refer to v3p127)
PotentiostatCounter Working Reference
InflowOutflow
V
i
LabVIEW 7.1™
Proton exchange membrane (Nafion 117)Platinum foil1M potassium chloride solution Magnetic stirrer bar
Ag/AgCl reference electrode (3M KCl)
Graphite rod 5mm Ø (current collector)
Biofilm coated granular graphite electrode
Compare Different Volatile Fatty Acids
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Time (hour)
Cur
rent
(mA
)
AcetatePropionateButyrate
MFC for Microbial Biosensor Development
- Potential Component for Anaerobic Digestion Process Control -
Outcomes on MFC Research at Murdoch University in 2007-08
Journal Publications• Cheng, K. Y., Ho, G., Cord-Ruwisch, R. (2008). "Affinity of microbial fuel cell biofilm for the
anodic potential." Environ. Sci. Technol., 10.1021/es8003969.• Cheng, K. Y., Cord-Ruwisch, R., Ho, G. (under review). A novel method for in situ cyclic
voltammetric studies of a microbial fuel cell biofilm. J. Microbiol. Meth.• Cheng, K. Y., Cord-Ruwisch, R. Ho, G. (in preparation). Evidence for an optimum anodic
potential for maximum current production in microbial fuel cell biofilms.
Conference Presentations• Cheng, K. Y., Cord-Ruwisch, R., Ho, G. (2007). A mixed anodophilic biofilm exhibits
saturation behavior with anodic potential in a microbial fuel cell. Microbial Fuel Cells: First International Symposium, Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania State, USA, May 27-29, 2008
• Cheng, K. Y., Cord-Ruwisch, R., Ho, G. (2007). Computer-controlled microbial fuel cell enables efficient electricity production from activated sludge. IWA Specialist Conference: 11th World Congress on Anaerobic Digestion: Bioenergy for Our Future – Renewable Energy from Waste. 23-27 Sep 2007 at Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Award• Cheng, K. Y. Winner of Huber Technology Prize 2008 (Munich, Germany): Enhanced
Electricty Production from Wastewater in a Computer-Controlled Microbial Fuel Cell. (superivsors: Dr. Ralf Cord Ruwisch & Prof. Goen Ho)
81
Summary
• Anaerobic reduction processes and aerobic oxidation processes are increasingly found to go hand in hand.
O2
Sulfate
E-donor
H2S
82
Summary
• Anaerobic reduction processes and aerobic oxidation processes are increasingly found to go hand in hand.
O2
Fe3+
E-donor
Fe2+
83
Summary
• Anaerobic reduction processes and aerobic oxidation processes are increasingly found to go hand in hand.
O2
CO2
H2
CH4
84
Summary
• Anaerobic reduction processes and aerobic oxidation processes are increasingly found to go hand in hand.
O2
NO3-
Organics
NH3
85
Iron reducing bacteria flowing electrons to ferric iron
• Organisms: Geobacter and other anaerobic bacteria, no specific group
•E- donors: mainly small organic compounds
• Typical reaction:
H2 + 2 Fe3+ --> 2 Fe2+ + 2 H+
• Reaction results in lowering of redox potential.
• Reduce also Manganese, elemental sulfur and other metals (e.g... uranium).
• Endproduct is magnetite (Fe3O4) and other compounds (black precipitates)
• Significance of iron reduction is still being underestimated.
•Recent research: electricity production using ferric iron reducing bacteria
86
Magnetite formation as the endproduct of iron reduction
87
Ideas:•solubilise iron (complexing, acid dissolving, etc.)•physically attach to ferric iron•excrete electron shuttling species (mediators)
use e-carriers present in environment
humic acids (quinone, analogue to NADH)
How do IRB transfer electrons to insoluble iron ?
?
88
Ideas:
Geobacter transfers electrons to oxidised humic acid which diffuses to the iron to pass on the electrons (quinone, analogue to NADAH).
Humic acids as natural mediators ?
Red Humics
Ox Humics OH
OH
O
ORed. Ox.
89
By transferring electrons to chlorinated hydrocarbonsReductive dechlorination Bioremediation potential
“Chlorine respiration”?
Other fancy tricks of Geobacter ?
Cl
Cl
e-
90
Own work:
Interspecies electron transfer from Geobacter to other strains
How? Cytochromes?
Wires?
Other fancy tricks of Geobacter ?
Acetate
Geobacter
Wolinella
Nitrate
e-
e-
91
If Geobacter can transfer electrons to almost anything, why not to a carbon anode.
Electricity generation by Geobacter
Outback batteries
Driving force: Organic wastes
Key: Sugar degrading Geobacter type (Rhodoferax)
Geobacter Headlines (Geobacter.com) :Bioelectricity
92
93
94
Simple approach to bio-electricity
95
Geobacters capability of reducing other metal species includes uranium.
By reducing U(VI) to U(IV) which is less soluble limitation of contaminationhas been applied in situ (2003) Tod Anderson
Geobacter Headlines 2:Cleanup of Uranium
96
Geobacters presence of deep ocean vents (black smokers) has been shown.
Temperature tolerance to 121 (autoclave)
Interesting Genome.
Suggestions of iron reducing Archeae to be one of the oldest lifeforms rather then sulfur reducers.
Very old magnetite formations are seen to support this view.
Geobacter Headlines 3:Hottest Bug Strain 121
97
Strain 121
98
Lecture Summary
1. Sulfate reduction P- release from sediments,Sulfur deposits,
Corrosion of submerged steel, Lethal gas emissions
2. NO3- reduction to N2
black precipitate, magnetite (Fe3O4), is produced when Fe3+ is reduced to Fe2+
3. CO2 reduction to CH4
Methane - highly energetic e-donor (fuel) in aerobic areas
4. Prolific life at the anaerobic/aerobic interface High activity at chemocline, Black smokers,
Life on CH4
99
Lecture Summary
1. Sulfate reduction P- release from sediments,Sulfur deposits,
Corrosion of submerged steel, Lethal gas emissions
2. Fe3+ reduction to Fe2+ black precipitate, magnetite (Fe3O4), is
produced when Fe3+ is reduced to Fe2+
3. CO2 reduction to CH4
Methane - highly energetic e-donor (fuel) in aerobic areas
4. Prolific life at the anaerobic/aerobic interface High activity at chemocline, Black smokers,
Life on CH4
100
End of lecture, below only for personal interest
101
Methane hydrate
• Methane hydrate, a curiosity or a significant global phenomenon?
• Needed for formation: low temperature and high pressure
• Why are hydrates mainly on the continental shelfes ?
• Deep oceans lack • high biologic productivity (CH4) • rapid sedimentation rates (bury the organic matter)
102
Methane gas hydrate formation
Gas hydrate stability zone on deep-water continental margins.
A water depth of 1200 meters is
assumed.
103
Sea floor slopes on continental margins are stable if the slope is less than 5°. However, many continental margins with shallow slopes have scars from underwater landslides. A potential trigger for shallow slope landslides is sudden gas release from the sediments. This can occur if the methane hydrate layer in the sediment becomes unstable. The hydrate layer can melt if the temperature rises or there is a drop in the confining pressure (below). Melting suddenly releases the methane trapped in the hydrate along with any natural gas trapped below the hydrate layer. Twenty thousand years ago an ice age resulted in the formation of large ice cap that covered much of northern Europe and Canada, and resulted in a 120m drop in sea level. The drop in sea-level reduced the pressure at the sea floor (due to the fact that there was less overlying water). Consequently the methane hydrate layer melted, causing many underwater landslides on the North American continental margin – the scares of which are still visible today and perhaps submarine slide scars recently mapped off Wollongong.
104
Gas hydrates and bubbles in the bermuda triangle
^ A drop in sea-level reduces the pressure at the sea floor and causes the melting of methane hydrate. The sudden release of gas results in landslides and slumps. It can also result in a plume of gas rapidly rising to the ocean surface. Gas in the water reduces the density of water leading to the loss of buoyancy of ocean going craft. Is this what causes the mysterious sinking of ships in the Bermuda Triangle? When sea level dropped during the last ice age, the destabilisation of hydrate and the release of methane may have been sufficient to heat the atmosphere via greenhouse effects and turn back the ice age.
At atmospheric pressure the concentration of methane in hydrate is over 600 times greater than in the free gas form. Methane hydrate is also significantly denser than liquid natural gas. Methane hydrate may provide a cost effective way of transporting and storing methane.