1 ts tte - university of kentuckynyx.uky.edu/dips/xt7pg44hn865/data/0162.pdf · iff. v...

1
iff . V tsujggfglfiiyrie.zrn,ii ' Wimini-JUJ-r-M- r- t r Volume XXIII. 'LEXINGTON, K. TUESDAY, JANUARY 16, 1810. I Number 1264. Ma - ",i-- 1 mttt --"' - -- T r ' i 1 is ! I THE KENTUCKY GAZETTE IS FUBLISHKD EVER TUESDAY, jjr THOMAS SMITH, OUCCESSOU TO DANIEL BUADronD. CONDITIONS. Two Dollars per paid in advance or Three Dollars, :f paid at the expiration of the year. addressed to 03 The postage on letters he Editor must be paid, or they will not be attended to. (C?- - The Printing Office is kept at the ol stand, onnosite the Branch Bank. LEXINGTON PRICES CURRENT Tobacco. - S 1 50 a 2 00 Hemp - - - - 6 00 a 7 00 Yarns - - - 9 00 a 10 00 Bees - - - - 2'OOd 2 50 Pork - - - 2 50 a 3 7 5 Flour - - - - 2'00 a 2 50 M(jicrbnsb.) 0 25 a 0 37 2 00 Salt - - Whiskey (per gal.) O 30 a 0 7 JOSEPH HAMILTON WAVEISS, Attor- ney, will relume his practice He resides in Lexington. All letters to him must be post- paid. Feb'y. i5th,i8oo. Wanted to contract for one thousand bushels Stone Coals, . delivered at this place Apply to Cutbbcrt Banks. Lexington Nov. 28 1808- - J. 8r D. Maccoun Request those indebted to them to make pay. inent before the 10th of July, as one of them intends to set out for Philadelphia and New-Yor- at that time. Lexin glon, Jure 12th, 18C9. Doctor James Overton WILL piactice PHYSIC, in Lexington and its neighbourhood ; he keeps his (hop on Main 'treet, nearly opposite the court house ; where he has for file an ettenfive flock of GENUINE MEDICINES; together with a complete alTbrtment of SUR- GEON'S INSTllUMEN r.S, made aster the Vatelr and molt approved models. To the Public. THE subscriber having opened a shop on Ihe comer of Limbstone and Water-street- where he does all kinds of WHIT SMITH'S WORK, hopes from his knowledge aud attention to busi. ness to meiit a share ot the public patronage. All 4Bort, plain and ornamental Railings, Grates, Iron Doors, for file proof buildings, Screws of different kind9, and Smith's work in general, executed with neatness and dispatch, on the most reasonable terms. N- - B A journeyman and two apprentices wanting to the above business. Thomas Studman. just PUBLISHED, And for Sale at this Office, Pricf 12. Cents, TWO SHOUT CATECHISMS, (DOCTRINAL & HISTORICAL J Designed fur the religious instiuction of Chil- dren in some of the most remaikable facts recoided in the Sacred Scriptures, and in the first piinciples of the Christian Religion. BY JOHN ANDREWS. JUST PUBLISHED, AND FOR SALE AT THIS OFFICE, BRADFORD'S KFxNTUCKY ALMANAC, For the vear of our Lord 1810 ; "CQNTAIMJVG, The Lunations, Conjunctions and Eclip ses ; ludirment ot the weather ; re markable days aud nights, together with useful tables and recipes, and a great variety of entertaing pieces, in prose, and verse. Frankfort Ware-Hous- e. THE subscribers are ready to receive Stor age of any description, at the usual tatts j Their Uige and convenient STONE WARE- HOUSE is nearly completed, in the erection of which great care has been taken to render it in- accessible to sire. A WHARF AND SLIP lias also been made, between the ware houseand the river, to facilitate the loading of boats in y stage of the water, which, it is believed, has this situation equal, is not superior, to most places in the uestirn country, for putting a cargo on board with expedition ar.d in good order Every attention will be paid to meet the wish- es of their customeis, and punctual attendance at all times. WILLIAM HUNTER, JOHN 1NSTONE. Frankfort, Nov. 29, 1809. ' -- tf Tobacco, Hemp, Whiskey, Hog's Lap.d, White Beans, and Country made Linew, WANTED BY LEW IS SANDERS. Lexington, 1st Jan'y. 1809. JUST PUBLISHED, AND FOR SALE AT THIS OFFICE, price 55 cents A SERMON ON REGENERATION, WITH AN ' APOLOGY and. as ADDRESS To the Synod, of Kenktucky ; TOGETHER WITH AN APPENDIX. BY T.-B- . CRAIGHEAD, A. B. V D. M- - Charles Humphreys PRACTICES Law in the Fayette and Jessamine courts. May, 1809. .JSMMgW't ' 1 'II STILLS FOR SALE. A TTHE COlTEIt AND TIN MANUTACTO-lt- Y OF THE SUBSCRIBE 11, WHO has by the late arrivals received a larrre assortment of COPPER &'TIN. and has engaged from the Eastward, some of the first woikmenin mi line ol trom which cir cumstance he cin with full confidence assuie his friends and the public, that any woik done by him will be executed in a superior manner, to any done in this State heretofore- - M. FISHEL: N. B. Persons owing the firm of Fishel & Gallaten,are requested te settle theiraccounts.or they will aster tliie notice, (is not attended to) be forced. tf Main street Lexington, 2d Jan'y. 1810. m A LIST OF LETTERS Remaining in the Post-Offic- e at Lexington, on the 31st December, 1809; winch is not taken out in three months, will be sent to the Gene- ral Post-Offic- e as dead letters. A Ayres, Samuel Allen, Eliza Allen, William Anderson, John Brandon, Joseph Brandon, bbenezer Bushnell, E. B'ach, Joseph j Bradley, Robert 2 Bird, Mark Bird, Abraham 2 Beaty, Cornelius Boone, Samuel Burton, William Beirvman Samuel a Brumoaragor, Fred- - eritk Bush, William T. Benning, James Barbee, Joseph Bruce, Tempeiance Bernard, John Bruce, Benjamin Carter, Mary C. 3 Crockett, Joseph 2 Laun, James Cair, Walter Car, John Cnsman, Joseph Carrick, William Coles, Edward Gary, John Cecil, jr. William Clayton, George Crooks, Robert Carr, Anthony Cole, Le Roy Coffield, Benjamin Label!, toward ii. Daily, William Deal, Richard Dickenson, ElizabethDunlap, jr. lohn Duval, Emriss, John Faver, John 3 Fisher, H. J Gardner, Hill Hendley, Martin L. Henderson, derS Susan John Hofkins, Harrison, John Hunnecutt, Hodgson, Jones, Asa Jolly, Thomas Kirtley, Francis Lyforce, V tlliam William 2 Leach, Linsay, Wiljum M M'Nutt, business, Ashby, Sarah Andrews, John Anderson, James 2 B Badger, John H. Boyle, Adam Blass, Anthony Bell, Montgomery John Bryan, Louis Robert 2 Berryman ThasH. Blaydes, WtilKfr uuckanan, Josep h Baldwin, Tyler Breckinridge, Mar ry H. Isaac Beaty, Elizabeth Bowler, John T. Bushnell, Charles Bliss, Anthony C , -- " Comstock, Daniel Larson, James Chiles, Thomas C Clinton, John Christopher, Robert Collins, Lewis Coyle, Rebec Clark, George Caldwell, George Campbell, Dr. J. P, Crothers, Samuel 3 Cunningham, Rob- ert M. 5 Cunningham, ChurchhiII,Mary Hi D D'Bell, Davis, J. H. 3 Edmondson, John 2 F Featherhill, Andrew Gibson, William Ganette, James H Huston, William Hugh, John 3 Hawkins, Moses Howard, Hall, James Harrison, Robert Hodgson, John Howard, William Huston, Robert Henry, John Henry, William 4 J Jameson, Jones, William E. Kerns, James 2 Lara, Samuel Lewis, Thomas James Lewis, Warner W- - 3 Laughlin, Jojin'4 Morrough, Christo John Furgason, Vivian Fleming, Leonardi . Fryan, Benjamin Friar, James Fletcher, Mary Friar, Robert Frazer,' Charles C. Flornoy, Matthias .Foster, N. Foid, Thomas R, Fisher, James Faulkner, Nelson Grimes, Linney Griffin, Samuel Grayson, Letitia P.2 Grimes, Chatles B. Guiltner, Barnard Groves! Anna Green, William Grubbs, Humphrey Gohagan, Anthony Goodman, Gaines Catherine Gist, Mordtcai Graham, George Grimes, Benjamin 2 Griffith, Ann Gains, Samuel Gain, F. S. Green, Samuel , Gray, Jonathan 2 Gayle, Robert D. Goodlett, Adam 2 Gregory, John Gains, Mary Gillam, Nelson Hammond, Larkin Hawkins, Alexan - Hill, Harris, James John M..ry Harrison, Mary H.Hornecher, John Johnson, William K Robinson Ladd, Leuy, Lemon, James James Elizabeth Bolton, Bledsoe, Baker, Emily George Mary George Long, M'Clure, James 2 M'Kendre, Wil liam 2 Maxwell, John 2 M'Clure, Samuel M'Lean, Robert D M'Nair, David D. Murphey, John Munay,Mrs. J. K.Milee, W illiam Martin, James 1. Morton, John Morton, Lucy Miller, Robert 15 Montague, Clement Murray, Catey Marshal, Marv h.. Messick, Samuel Monroe, John Mason, John M'Chm, Samuel M'Chard, Polly Mcore, Rev.' James N Nicholas, Eliza R. Nicholas, James O Outten, Levy Ollendorf & Mason- - Power, Thomas Rev. Phillips, Samuel James Porter, S. 2 Price, Philemon B. Pane, Fanny M. Quarlcs, Russel, Robert S. Runyan, Frances Kielm, Jacob 2 Richarson, Thomas Romine. Elias Randol, John Scott, William Smith, John i- - Smith, Abn. 1, Smith, Alexr. Smith, Abraham Smith, George Stong, John Sayre, Joseph Steele, Brice Steele, David Sutton, William T Teirell, John Thornton, James Turner, Lewis E Todd, Robert Tegarden, Tarascon, JuA. Wilson, Reed Wilson, Mary Wilson, Tames Wilson, Thomas Wilson, Abraham vAr:i- - c 1 "Miawu, .jaiiiuci Woods, John. Woods, James Woods, Willjam Wood, Stephen Williams, Henry Watson. Samuel E. M praisea State phcr Matterson George Aiinor, James Minor, George M'lver. Jr.Peart, More, Benjamin Magill, James M'Kee, John Marklev, lohn Adarrt Moffutt, Cyrus Moss, John J Murdrough, Susana Murray, John Minor, John M'Cally, Andrew M'Dowell, Mooney, Simpson Markle, Jacob North, Abraham Newman, O'Farrel. lames Pafiett, Dr. Kogger 2Richardson, James Ryan, Relev. Rankin, Adam Rollins, Anthony W. Ths. S Steward, Richard Stark, Ann Sullivan, George Steele, William Sechrest, William Smith, Alexander S. Stout, Philemon Scott, Arthur Scott, William Shrlds, John T Tracey, Edw. Tapp, Lewis Thornley, William True, James Tinsley, John Walton. William Weeden,Nathaniel Wever, James Wilkinson, Joseph aWard, James i.. augliuci juacuu Winters, Elisha Wright, Hillary Wright, Alexander Williams, P. Warner.William Whitlock, 14 hich. an- - RICH'd. LAFON. Clarke Circuit, term, 1809. motion of the it ordered Lr.uette tor eight weeks Williams, Wilson D. Wrigglesworth, Wallace, C. B. John Wrigley, Warble, Philip Woodson, Addison aWoinack, John Whaley, James York, Bartlet. NOTICE. ALL persons havirg demands against estateof Charles Mason, dee'd. are requested to forward them adjusted And all those indebted to said estate are also quested to make immediate pavment, or suits will be commenced, JOHN HIGBEE, Ex'r. POLLEY MASON, Exec's. Fajette County, Jan'y 1810 Taken up by Haydon, in Jestamine county, on South of creek, one BLACK MARE, eleven ears old, a small in sorehead, both hind white, branded on,the near buttock' shoul der with about to J uouars. October 11th, 1809. of Kentucky, September W M'Chord, H. Tonh N. Dr. Rev. Joel Senr. Richardson, H. Rev Joel hands set. the the come and have the Thomas the Clear about star feet and Joel Collins complainant, Against Richard S. Hackley, Robeit Patton Green how, and Jacob Walsh, jv. defendants. IN CHANCERY. THE defendants not having entered their agreeably to law and the rules this couit, and itanpearincrto the satisfaction tf the court they not inhabitants of this aommonvvealth on the plainant by his counsel, Gectee defendants do appear here on.the third day of our next March term, and answer copy of this order he in- - - rtea the Kentucky nccessively. ' 2 . 2 Banjamin 2 v 2 W , 1 t 1. v , 4 u 6 - ) her J . f s; the com- plainant's hill j a in A copy. I est, JAMES ANDERSON, d. c. c. c. Ten Dollars Reward. STOLENfrom the subscriber, Claike Coun ty, near Winchester, in the night of the 23d a light coloured SORREL MARE, three J ears old last spring, heavy with foal, about 14 hands 3 inches high, trots and paces a slow travel on smooth road, walks uncom- monly w ell, star and snip on her sorehead, she wa cut on the ham stiing, ar.d in healing lest two lumps very perceivable to be seen, but not recollected which leg it was on: 'he was dock ed last spring. Any person delivering said mare 10 me snail receive me reasonaale charges paid W. B. P tir com that re. 8th, fork that are id that lars more is accompanied by the illian. DONNALDSON 6, 1810. 3t BLANKS OF For Sale at Jame3 Ninian James JOHN January aDOte reward, and all together with ten dol. ALL KINDS this Office. . BOCUMEjYTS which accompanied the MESSAGE OF THE PRESIDENT, CONCLUED. Mr. Smith to Mr. Pinkney. Department of State, Nov. 23, 1809. Sin, My letters, in the correspondence with Mr. Jackson, already transmitted to you, sufficiently evince the disap- pointment that was felt, on finding that he had not been charged to make to this government either the frank ex- planations or the liberal propositions, which the occasion manifestly required. Instead of this obvious course of pro- ceeding, it was in the outset perceiv- ed that his object was to bring 113 to re sume the subjects of the arrangement ot April, in a way that would imply that we were aware that the arrange- ment was not binding on his govern- ment, because made with the knowledge on our part that Mr. Erskinc had no authority to make it, and thus to con- vert the responsibility of his govern- ment for the disavowal injo a reproach on this for its conduct in the transaction disavowed. In the first instance it was deemed best rather to repel his observations than to meet them as an offensive insinuation." 'This forbear- ance had not the expected effect of re- straining him from a repetition of the offence. And even on his further in- sinuations nothing more was done than topremonish him of the inadrhissibilty of s'o indecorous a course of proceed- ing. This also being without effect, nothing remained but the step finally taken. And there was the less hesi- tation in shutting the door to further opportunities for insulting insinuations, as the disclosures he had made and the spirit of his discussions had So entirely shut it to the hope of any favorable re- sult from his mission. I will not dwell on his reluctance to give up the uncertainties of verbal, for the precision of written discussion, rot-o- the manner or the time of hjs denial that he had given any 100m at all for a Statement, which, in order to guard the misconceptions incident ti verbal conferences, had placed befort him in writing, with a request that he would point out any inaccuracies, and to which he did not then object other- wise than by intimating, that he could not ha e the statement with the particu- lar view nbfeb seemed to be suppostd in or win 1 cnvcii on the various instan ces in which partial or inconsistent views of the subject have taken place of its real merits. But it may libt be amiss to make some observations on the correspondence, as it relates to the justification of bis government in having aisavoweu tne act ot ins predecessor. With respect to the orders in coun- cil, the ground of the disavowal ib the difference between the arrangement and the piinted despatch of Mr. Canning to Mr. Erskineof the 23d of January. According to this despatch, then, the arrangement sailed in three points : I. In not relinquishing the trade of the United States with enemies' colo- nies. With respect to this point it is neces- sary at this time to discuss the right to that trade. It is sufficient to remark, 1st. That as the trade is admitted to have become in the yiew of Gieat Brit- ain of little practical importance, why has it been made a ground of the disa- vowal, and, especially, as important considerations only could, upon princi-pie- s of public law, have justified a mea- sure of so serious a character I 2d. That as the colonial trade is a subject nowise connected either with the or- ders in council or with the affair of the Chesapeake, why has it been permitted to frustrate an arrangement relating to those subjects, Sc t6 those only ? 3d. That as this condition is alledged to have ori- ginated in a supposition that it would be agreeable to the American govern- ment, why has it been persisted in as- ter the error was made known by the representation of Mr. Erskine to his government, that neither this nor the other conditions of the despatch of the 2 ?d of January, were attainable heiq? 2. Another point in the despatch and not in the arrangement is, that the Brit- ish navy might capture our trade to ports prohibited by the. United States. This condi'tion too, appears to have had its origin in a mistake of ypur meaning in a conversation with Mr. Canning, as noted by yourself, and in an inference thence deduced as to the disposition of this government. But this double mistake milst have bean brought to light in time to have been corrected in the new mission. In urging it, Mr. Canning has "taken a ground forbidden by those principles of decorum which regulate and mark the proceedings of governments to- wards ench othc. In his despatch the cadition iS suted to be for the pur- pose of securing the bona side mte.ntr.it ofLvmeiica to prevent her citizens frmn tiading with France and certain otlret pou crs ; in other words, to se- cure. pledge to that effect against the malmie intention of the United Sute. Andftrib despatch too, was anthoiized to beommunicated in cxtensto, to the government of which (.such language was usid. M ight it no't have been that such a condition and such o6servations would ..t least, on suchn occasion, have been Riven up by a gjvernment willing to smooth the way an amicable settlement of existing diYcrences ? In his ztal to vindicate his govern- ment, Mr.sSickson too has attempted a gloss on thii most extraordinary idea of calling oiifefoi-tig- soveieignty, not inueeci to mat- - jaws tor us, but what is equivalent! principle, to supply a Mjjjjiuseu iii.;uiiry He calls such his government to the iiAm: 11. ol an execution of tl. e had taken place on tw 01 congiess, out ot a 1 ompact binding as a pubic law on both panic-- , and which bodi Vuuld have a common in seeingVluIy executed. On his own principleltheie ought to be a reciprocity, nof onV j tiie execution of the compacts buU, the obligation and interest res ikinkfrom it. Besides, where there is a recVocily in com-pac- ts between nitions touching attri- butes of soveieignty, tte is always as much of the sovereignty gained as is parted with, sq tint there be no loss or indignity on eitheride. 3. The remaininVpoint in the des- patch not secuicd by! the arrangement, is that which requiie that whilst our prohibotory laws shouM be repealed as to Great Britain, they slouid be lest in force as to 1 ranee aid the powers adopting or acting iindeKher decrees. This is the conditionWliich alone properly belongs to the sulject, and it is to be remarked, in the'first place, that the British project, of vtfiich this condition makes a part, contemplated two things in their nature incompati- ble ; one a repeal of the prohibitory acts as to Great Biitam without waiting for the conclusion of a regular treaty ; the other a pledge or engagement for their continuance as to the other Now, from the nature of our con- stitution, which, in this particular, ought to have been attended to by the British government, it is manifest, that the executive could have given no sdeh sledge, that the continuance of the being a subject of legis- lative consideration, could not have been provided for until the meeting of the legislature, and tht the condition could not therefore but have sailed, ei- ther jin the immediate renewal of com- merce with Great Britain, or in theim-medik- e engagement that it should not be lehewed with France. ThJ: British government ought to have atquiesced in, and indeed ought to hav been satisfied with, the attain- ment ohhe important object of an im- mediate repeal of our prohibitory laws, and with the consideration that the oth- er objcc, not immediately attainable, was unnecessary at the time, because the prohibition as to France was then in force, and because there was every reason to, infer, not only from thufact, but from the spirit of the communica- tions made from time to time, and from the ovrrturcs before submitted to the British government, that, without a repeal of the French decrees, our pro- hibotory laws would be continued in force against Fiance, and especially in the case of a repeal of the Britih orders, would necessarily render a continuance of the French decrees doubly obnoxi- ous. But is on this head doubts could have been entertained, instead of 1 ejecting the arrangement, ought not the repeal- ing act on our part to have been met with a suspension at least of the orders in council until it could have been seen whether the law would or would not have been continued France. Such a suspension could not haiys given in any point of view more advantage to the United States than was given to Great Britain by the repeal, which execute interest pow- ers. men part. Is this reasonable course could rjot have been substituted for the disavowal, why was not a final disavowal suspend- ed with a proposition that the arrange, menr. would be executed by Great Brit, ain, in the event of a compliance on the part of the United States with the con- dition required as to France. I am not unaware, you may be told, that the law of the U. States did not extend to Holland, though so intimately connected with France, and so subservient to her de crees against neutral commerce. It would not be improper on this oc- casion to observe, that this obj etion .. in be the less urged by Great B-l- f J(n,

Upload: truongkhanh

Post on 30-Jul-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

iff .

V tsujggfglfiiyrie.zrn,ii 'Wimini-JUJ-r-M- r- t r

Volume XXIII. 'LEXINGTON, K. TUESDAY, JANUARY 16, 1810. I Number 1264.

Ma - ",i-- 1mttt --"' - -- T

r '

i

1is

!

I

THE KENTUCKY GAZETTE

IS FUBLISHKD EVER TUESDAY,

jjr THOMAS SMITH,

OUCCESSOU TO DANIEL BUADronD.

CONDITIONS. Two Dollars per

paid in advance or Three Dollars,:f paid at the expiration of the year.

addressed to03 The postage on letters

he Editor must be paid, or they will not be

attended to.(C?- - The Printing Office is kept at the ol

stand, onnosite the Branch Bank.

LEXINGTON PRICES CURRENT

Tobacco. - S 1 50 a 2 00

Hemp - - - - 6 00 a 7 00

Yarns - - - 9 00 a 10 00

Bees - - - - 2'OOd 2 50

Pork - - - 2 50 a 3 7 5

Flour - - - - 2'00 a 2 50

M(jicrbnsb.) 0 25 a 0 372 00Salt - -

Whiskey (per gal.) O 30 a 0 7

JOSEPH HAMILTON WAVEISS, Attor-

ney, will relume his practice He resides inLexington. All letters to him must be post-

paid. Feb'y. i5th,i8oo.

Wanted to contract for one thousand bushels

Stone Coals, .

delivered at this place Apply toCutbbcrt Banks.

Lexington Nov. 28 1808- -

J. 8r D. MaccounRequest those indebted to them to make pay.

inent before the 10th of July, as one of themintends to set out for Philadelphia and New-Yor-

at that time.Lexin glon, Jure 12th, 18C9.

Doctor James OvertonWILL piactice PHYSIC, in Lexington and

its neighbourhood ; he keeps his (hop on Main'treet, nearly opposite the court house ; wherehe has for file an ettenfive flock of

GENUINE MEDICINES;together with a complete alTbrtment of SUR-

GEON'S INSTllUMEN r.S, made aster theVatelr and molt approved models.

To the Public.THE subscriber having opened a shop on Ihe

comer of Limbstone and Water-street- wherehe does all kinds of WHIT SMITH'S WORK,hopes from his knowledge aud attention to busi.ness to meiit a share ot the public patronage.

All 4Bort, plain and ornamental Railings,Grates, Iron Doors, for file proof buildings,Screws of different kind9, and Smith's work in

general, executed with neatness and dispatch, on

the most reasonable terms.N- - B A journeyman and two apprentices

wanting to the above business.Thomas Studman.

just PUBLISHED,And for Sale at this Office,

Pricf 12. Cents,TWO SHOUT CATECHISMS,(DOCTRINAL & HISTORICAL J

Designed fur the religious instiuction of Chil-

dren in some of the most remaikable factsrecoided in the Sacred Scriptures, and inthe first piinciples of the Christian Religion.

BY JOHN ANDREWS.

JUST PUBLISHED,AND FOR SALE AT THIS OFFICE,

BRADFORD'S KFxNTUCKY

ALMANAC,For the vear of our Lord 1810 ;

"CQNTAIMJVG,The Lunations, Conjunctions and Eclip

ses ; ludirment ot the weather ; remarkable days aud nights, togetherwith useful tables and recipes, and agreat variety of entertaing pieces, inprose, and verse.

Frankfort Ware-Hous- e.

THE subscribers are ready to receive Storage of any description, at the usual tatts j

Their Uige and convenient STONE WARE-HOUSE is nearly completed, in the erection ofwhich great care has been taken to render it in-

accessible to sire. A WHARF AND SLIPlias also been made, between the ware houseandthe river, to facilitate the loading of boats in y

stage of the water, which, it is believed, hasthis situation equal, is not superior, to

most places in the uestirn country, for puttinga cargo on board with expedition ar.d in goodorder

Every attention will be paid to meet the wish-

es of their customeis, and punctual attendanceat all times.

WILLIAM HUNTER,JOHN 1NSTONE.

Frankfort, Nov. 29, 1809. ' -- tf

Tobacco, Hemp, Whiskey,Hog's Lap.d, White Beans,and Country made Linew,

WANTED BYLEW IS SANDERS.

Lexington, 1st Jan'y. 1809.

JUST PUBLISHED,AND FOR SALE AT THIS OFFICE,

price 55 centsA SERMON

ON REGENERATION,WITH AN '

APOLOGY and. as ADDRESSTo the Synod, of Kenktucky ;

TOGETHER WITH

AN APPENDIX.BY T.-B- . CRAIGHEAD, A. B. V D. M- -

Charles HumphreysPRACTICES Law in the Fayette and

Jessamine courts. May, 1809.

.JSMMgW't ' 1 'II

STILLS FOR SALE.A TTHE COlTEIt AND TIN MANUTACTO-lt- Y

OF THE SUBSCRIBE 11,

WHO has by the late arrivals received alarrre assortment of COPPER &'TIN. and hasengaged from the Eastward, some of the firstwoikmenin mi line ol trom which circumstance he cin with full confidence assuiehis friends and the public, that any woik doneby him will be executed in a superior manner,to any done in this State heretofore- -

M. FISHEL:N. B. Persons owing the firm of Fishel &

Gallaten,are requested te settle theiraccounts.orthey will aster tliie notice, (is not attended to)be forced. tf

Main street Lexington, 2d Jan'y. 1810. m

A LIST OF LETTERSRemaining in the Post-Offic- e at Lexington, on

the 31st December, 1809; winch is not takenout in three months, will be sent to the Gene-ral Post-Offic- e as dead letters.

AAyres, SamuelAllen, ElizaAllen, WilliamAnderson, John

Brandon, JosephBrandon, bbenezerBushnell, E.B'ach, Joseph

j Bradley, Robert 2Bird, MarkBird, Abraham 2Beaty, CorneliusBoone, SamuelBurton, WilliamBeirvman Samuel aBrumoaragor, Fred- -

eritkBush, William T.Benning, JamesBarbee, JosephBruce, TempeianceBernard, JohnBruce, Benjamin

Carter, Mary C. 3Crockett, Joseph 2Laun, JamesCair, WalterCar, JohnCnsman, JosephCarrick, WilliamColes, EdwardGary, JohnCecil, jr. WilliamClayton, GeorgeCrooks, RobertCarr, AnthonyCole, Le RoyCoffield, BenjaminLabel!, toward ii.

Daily, WilliamDeal, RichardDickenson, ElizabethDunlap, jr. lohnDuval,

Emriss, John

Faver, John 3Fisher,

H. JGardner,

Hill

Hendley,

Martin L.Henderson,

derSSusan

JohnHofkins,Harrison, JohnHunnecutt,Hodgson,

Jones, AsaJolly, Thomas

Kirtley, Francis

Lyforce,V tlliam

William2

Leach,Linsay, Wiljum

MM'Nutt,

business,

Ashby, SarahAndrews, JohnAnderson, James 2

BBadger, John H.Boyle, AdamBlass, AnthonyBell, Montgomery

JohnBryan, Louis

Robert 2

Berryman ThasH.Blaydes, WtilKfruuckanan, Josep hBaldwin, TylerBreckinridge, Mar

ry H.Isaac

Beaty, ElizabethBowler, John T.Bushnell, CharlesBliss, Anthony

C , --"

Comstock, DanielLarson, JamesChiles, Thomas CClinton, JohnChristopher, RobertCollins, LewisCoyle, RebecClark, GeorgeCaldwell, GeorgeCampbell, Dr. J. P,

Crothers, Samuel 3Cunningham, Rob-

ert M. 5Cunningham,ChurchhiII,Mary Hi

DD'Bell,Davis, J. H. 3

Edmondson, John 2

FFeatherhill, Andrew

Gibson, WilliamGanette, James

HHuston, WilliamHugh, John 3Hawkins, MosesHoward,Hall, JamesHarrison, RobertHodgson, JohnHoward, WilliamHuston, RobertHenry, JohnHenry, William 4

JJameson,Jones, William E.

Kerns, James 2

Lara, SamuelLewis, Thomas

JamesLewis, Warner W- - 3Laughlin, Jojin'4

Morrough, Christo

John Furgason, VivianFleming, Leonardi . Fryan, BenjaminFriar, James Fletcher, MaryFriar, Robert Frazer,' Charles C.Flornoy, Matthias .Foster, N.Foid, Thomas R, Fisher, JamesFaulkner, Nelson

Grimes, Linney Griffin, SamuelGrayson, Letitia P.2 Grimes, Chatles B.Guiltner, Barnard Groves! AnnaGreen, William Grubbs, HumphreyGohagan, Anthony Goodman,Gaines Catherine Gist, MordtcaiGraham, George Grimes, Benjamin 2Griffith, Ann Gains, SamuelGain, F. S. Green, Samuel ,

Gray, Jonathan 2 Gayle, Robert D.Goodlett, Adam 2 Gregory, JohnGains,

MaryGillam,

NelsonHammond, LarkinHawkins,

Alexan -

Hill,Harris,

James

JohnM..ry

Harrison, Mary H.Hornecher, John

Johnson, WilliamK

RobinsonLadd,Leuy,Lemon, James

James

Elizabeth

Bolton,

Bledsoe,

Baker,

Emily

George

Mary

George

Long,

M'Clure, James 2M'Kendre, Wil

liam 2

Maxwell, John 2

M'Clure, SamuelM'Lean, Robert DM'Nair, David D.Murphey, JohnMunay,Mrs. J. K.Milee, W illiamMartin, James 1.Morton, JohnMorton, LucyMiller, Robert 15Montague, ClementMurray, CateyMarshal, Marv h..Messick, SamuelMonroe, JohnMason, JohnM'Chm, SamuelM'Chard, PollyMcore, Rev.' James

NNicholas, Eliza R.Nicholas, James

OOutten, LevyOllendorf & Mason- -

Power, Thomas

Rev.

Phillips, Samuel JamesPorter, S. 2 Price, Philemon B.Pane, Fanny M.

Quarlcs,

Russel, Robert S.Runyan, FrancesKielm, Jacob 2Richarson, ThomasRomine. EliasRandol, John

Scott, WilliamSmith, John i- -

Smith, Abn. 1,Smith, Alexr.Smith, AbrahamSmith, GeorgeStong, JohnSayre, JosephSteele, BriceSteele, DavidSutton, William

T

Teirell, JohnThornton, JamesTurner, Lewis ETodd, RobertTegarden,Tarascon, JuA.

Wilson, ReedWilson, MaryWilson, TamesWilson, ThomasWilson, AbrahamvAr:i- - c 1

"Miawu, .jaiiiuciWoods, John.Woods, JamesWoods, WilljamWood, StephenWilliams, HenryWatson. Samuel E.

Mpraisea

State

phcrMatterson GeorgeAiinor,

JamesMinor, GeorgeM'lver.

Jr.Peart,

More, Benjamin

Magill, JamesM'Kee, JohnMarklev, lohn AdarrtMoffutt, CyrusMoss, John JMurdrough, SusanaMurray, JohnMinor, JohnM'Cally, AndrewM'Dowell,Mooney, SimpsonMarkle, Jacob

North, AbrahamNewman,

O'Farrel. lames

Pafiett, Dr.

Kogger

2Richardson, JamesRyan,Relev.Rankin, AdamRollins, Anthony W.

Ths.SSteward, RichardStark, AnnSullivan, GeorgeSteele, WilliamSechrest, WilliamSmith, Alexander S.Stout, PhilemonScott, ArthurScott, WilliamShrlds, John

TTracey, Edw.Tapp, LewisThornley, WilliamTrue, JamesTinsley, John

Walton. WilliamWeeden,NathanielWever, JamesWilkinson, Joseph

aWard, Jamesi..augliuci juacuu

Winters, ElishaWright, HillaryWright, AlexanderWilliams, P.Warner.WilliamWhitlock,

14 hich. an- -

RICH'd. LAFON.

Clarke Circuit,term, 1809.

motion of theit ordered

Lr.uette tor eight weeks

Williams, Wilson D. Wrigglesworth,Wallace, C. B. JohnWrigley, Warble, PhilipWoodson, Addison aWoinack, JohnWhaley, James

York, Bartlet.

NOTICE.ALL persons havirg demands against

estateof Charles Mason, dee'd. are requested toforward them adjusted And all

those indebted to said estate are alsoquested to make immediate pavment, or suitswill be commenced,

JOHN HIGBEE, Ex'r.POLLEY MASON, Exec's.

Fajette County, Jan'y 1810

Taken up by Haydon,in Jestamine county, on South ofcreek, one BLACK MARE, eleven earsold, a small in sorehead, both hindwhite, branded on,the near buttock' shoulder with about

to J uouars.

October 11th, 1809.

of Kentucky,September

W

M'Chord,

H.Tonh

N.

Dr.

Rev.

JoelSenr.

Richardson, H.

Rev

Joel

hands

set.

the

the

come and havethe

Thomasthe Clear

aboutstar feet

and

Joel Collins complainant,Against

Richard S. Hackley, Robeit Patton Greenhow, and Jacob Walsh, jv. defendants.

IN CHANCERY.THE defendants not having entered their

agreeably to law and the rulesthis couit, and itanpearincrto the satisfaction

tf the court they not inhabitants of thisaommonvvealth on theplainant by his counsel,

Gectee

defendants do appear here on.the third dayof our next March term, and answer

copy of this order he in- -- rtea the Kentuckynccessively.

'

2.

2

Banjamin

2

v

2

W

,

1

t 1.v ,

4

u

6

-

)her

J

.

f

s;the com-

plainant's hill j ain

A copy. I est,JAMES ANDERSON, d. c. c. c.

Ten Dollars Reward.STOLENfrom the subscriber, Claike Coun

ty, near Winchester, in the night of the 23da light coloured SORREL MARE,

three J ears old last spring, heavy with foal,about 14 hands 3 inches high, trots and pacesa slow travel on smooth road, walks uncom-monly w ell, star and snip on her sorehead, shewa cut on the ham stiing, ar.d in healing lesttwo lumps very perceivable to be seen, but notrecollected which leg it was on: 'he was docked last spring. Any person delivering said mare10 me snail receive mereasonaale charges paid

W. B.

P

tir

comthat

re.

8th,

fork

that are

id

that

lars more is accompanied by the illian.DONNALDSON

6, 1810. 3t

BLANKS OFFor Sale at

Jame3

Ninian

James

JOHNJanuary

aDOte reward, and alltogether with ten dol.

ALL KINDSthis Office.

. BOCUMEjYTSwhich accompanied the

MESSAGE OF THE PRESIDENT,CONCLUED.

Mr. Smith to Mr. Pinkney.Department of State, Nov. 23, 1809.

Sin,My letters, in the correspondence

with Mr. Jackson, already transmittedto you, sufficiently evince the disap-pointment that was felt, on finding thathe had not been charged to make tothis government either the frank ex-

planations or the liberal propositions,which the occasion manifestly required.Instead of this obvious course of pro-

ceeding, it was in the outset perceiv-ed that his object was to bring 113 to resume the subjects of the arrangementot April, in a way that would implythat we were aware that the arrange-ment was not binding on his govern-ment, because made with the knowledgeon our part that Mr. Erskinc had noauthority to make it, and thus to con-

vert the responsibility of his govern-ment for the disavowal injo a reproachon this for its conduct in the transactiondisavowed.

In the first instance it was deemedbest rather to repel his observations

than to meet them asan offensive insinuation." 'This forbear-ance had not the expected effect of re-

straining him from a repetition of theoffence. And even on his further in-

sinuations nothing more was done thantopremonish him of the inadrhissibiltyof s'o indecorous a course of proceed-ing. This also being without effect,nothing remained but the step finallytaken. And there was the less hesi-tation in shutting the door to furtheropportunities for insulting insinuations,as the disclosures he had made and thespirit of his discussions had So entirelyshut it to the hope of any favorable re-

sult from his mission.I will not dwell on his reluctance to

give up the uncertainties of verbal, forthe precision of written discussion, rot-o-

the manner or the time of hjs denialthat he had given any 100m at all for aStatement, which, in order to guard

the misconceptions incident tiverbal conferences, had placed beforthim in writing, with a request that hewould point out any inaccuracies, andto which he did not then object other-wise than by intimating, that he couldnot ha e the statement with the particu-lar view nbfeb seemed to be suppostdin or win 1 cnvcii on the various instances in which partial or inconsistentviews of the subject have taken placeof its real merits. But it may libt beamiss to make some observations onthe correspondence, as it relates to thejustification of bis government in havingaisavoweu tne act ot ins predecessor.

With respect to the orders in coun-cil, the ground of the disavowal ib thedifference between the arrangement andthe piinted despatch of Mr. Canningto Mr. Erskineof the 23d of January.According to this despatch, then, thearrangement sailed in three points :

I. In not relinquishing the trade ofthe United States with enemies' colo-nies.

With respect to this point it is neces-sary at this time to discuss the right tothat trade. It is sufficient to remark,1st. That as the trade is admitted tohave become in the yiew of Gieat Brit-ain of little practical importance, whyhas it been made a ground of the disa-vowal, and, especially, as importantconsiderations only could, upon princi-pie- s

ofpublic law, have justified a mea-sure of so serious a character I 2d.That as the colonial trade is a subjectnowise connected either with the or-

ders in council or with the affair of theChesapeake, why has it been permittedto frustrate an arrangement relating tothose subjects, Sc t6 those only ? 3d. Thatas this condition is alledged to have ori-ginated in a supposition that it wouldbe agreeable to the American govern-ment, why has it been persisted in as-

ter the error was made known by therepresentation of Mr. Erskine to hisgovernment, that neither this nor theother conditions of the despatch of the2 ?d of January, were attainable heiq?

2. Another point in the despatch andnot in the arrangement is, that the Brit-ish navy might capture our trade toports prohibited by the. United States.

This condi'tion too, appears to havehad its origin in a mistake of ypurmeaning in a conversation with Mr.Canning, as noted by yourself, and inan inference thence deduced as to thedisposition of this government. Butthis double mistake milst have beanbrought to light in time to have beencorrected in the new mission. Inurging it, Mr. Canning has "taken aground forbidden by those principlesof decorum which regulate and markthe proceedings of governments to-

wards ench othc. In his despatch the

cadition iS suted to be for the pur-pose of securing the bona side mte.ntr.itofLvmeiica to prevent her citizensfrmn tiading with France and certainotlret pou crs ; in other words, to se-cure. pledge to that effect against themalmie intention of the United Sute.Andftrib despatch too, was anthoiizedto beommunicated in cxtensto, to thegovernment of which (.such languagewas usid. M ight it no't have been

that such a conditionand such o6servations would ..t least,on suchn occasion, have been Rivenup by a gjvernment willing to smooththe way an amicable settlement ofexisting diYcrences ?

In his ztal to vindicate his govern-ment, Mr.sSickson too has attempteda gloss on thii most extraordinary ideaof calling oiifefoi-tig- soveieignty, notinueeci to mat- - jaws tor us, but whatis equivalent! principle, to supply aMjjjjiuseu iii.;uiiryHe calls suchhis government

to theiiAm:

11.

olan execution of tl. e

had taken place on

tw 01 congiess, out ot a 1 ompactbinding as a pubic law on both panic-- ,and which bodi Vuuld have a common

in seeingVluIy executed. Onhis own principleltheie ought to be areciprocity, nof onV j tiie executionof the compacts buU, the obligationand interest res ikinkfrom it. Besides,where there is a recVocily in com-pac- ts

between nitions touching attri-butes of soveieignty, tte is always asmuch of the sovereignty gained as isparted with, sq tint there be no loss orindignity on eitheride.

3. The remaininVpoint in the des-patch not secuicd by! the arrangement,is that which requiie that whilst ourprohibotory laws shouM be repealed asto Great Britain, they slouid be lest inforce as to 1 ranee aid the powersadopting or acting iindeKher decrees.

This is the conditionWliich aloneproperly belongs to the sulject, and itis to be remarked, in the'first place,that the British project, of vtfiich thiscondition makes a part, contemplatedtwo things in their nature incompati-ble ; one a repeal of the prohibitoryacts as to Great Biitam without waitingfor the conclusion of a regular treaty ;the other a pledge or engagement fortheir continuance as to the other

Now, from the nature of our con-stitution, which, in this particular,ought to have been attended to by theBritish government, it is manifest, thatthe executive could have given no sdehsledge, that the continuance of the

being a subject of legis-lative consideration, could not havebeen provided for until the meeting ofthe legislature, and tht the conditioncould not therefore but have sailed, ei-ther jin the immediate renewal of com-merce with Great Britain, or in theim-medik- e

engagement that it should notbe lehewed with France.

ThJ: British government ought tohave atquiesced in, and indeed oughtto hav been satisfied with, the attain-ment ohhe important object of an im-mediate repeal of our prohibitory laws,and with the consideration that the oth-er objcc, not immediately attainable,was unnecessary at the time, becausethe prohibition as to France was thenin force, and because there was everyreason to, infer, not only from thufact,but from the spirit of the communica-tions made from time to time, and fromthe ovrrturcs before submitted to theBritish government, that, without arepeal of the French decrees, our pro-hibotory laws would be continued inforce against Fiance, and especially inthe case of a repeal of the Britih orders,would necessarily render a continuanceof the French decrees doubly obnoxi-ous.

But is on this head doubts could havebeen entertained, instead of 1 ejectingthe arrangement, ought not the repeal-ing act on our part to have been metwith a suspension at least of the ordersin council until it could have been seenwhether the law wouldor would not have been continued

France. Such a suspensioncould not haiys given in any point ofview more advantage to the UnitedStates than was given to Great Britainby the repeal, which

execute

interest

pow-ers.

men part.Is this reasonable course could rjot

have been substituted for the disavowal,why was not a final disavowal suspend-ed with a proposition that the arrange,menr. would be executed by Great Brit,ain, in the event of a compliance on thepart of the United States with the con-dition required as to France.

I am not unaware, you may be told,that the law of the U.States did not extend to Holland,though so intimately connected withFrance, and so subservient to her decrees against neutral commerce.

It would not be improper on this oc-casion to observe, that this obj etion.. in be the less urged by Great B-l- f J(n,