1 ts tte - university of kentuckynyx.uky.edu/dips/xt7pg44hn865/data/0162.pdf · iff. v...
TRANSCRIPT
iff .
V tsujggfglfiiyrie.zrn,ii 'Wimini-JUJ-r-M- r- t r
Volume XXIII. 'LEXINGTON, K. TUESDAY, JANUARY 16, 1810. I Number 1264.
Ma - ",i-- 1mttt --"' - -- T
r '
i
1is
!
I
THE KENTUCKY GAZETTE
IS FUBLISHKD EVER TUESDAY,
jjr THOMAS SMITH,
OUCCESSOU TO DANIEL BUADronD.
CONDITIONS. Two Dollars per
paid in advance or Three Dollars,:f paid at the expiration of the year.
addressed to03 The postage on letters
he Editor must be paid, or they will not be
attended to.(C?- - The Printing Office is kept at the ol
stand, onnosite the Branch Bank.
LEXINGTON PRICES CURRENT
Tobacco. - S 1 50 a 2 00
Hemp - - - - 6 00 a 7 00
Yarns - - - 9 00 a 10 00
Bees - - - - 2'OOd 2 50
Pork - - - 2 50 a 3 7 5
Flour - - - - 2'00 a 2 50
M(jicrbnsb.) 0 25 a 0 372 00Salt - -
Whiskey (per gal.) O 30 a 0 7
JOSEPH HAMILTON WAVEISS, Attor-
ney, will relume his practice He resides inLexington. All letters to him must be post-
paid. Feb'y. i5th,i8oo.
Wanted to contract for one thousand bushels
Stone Coals, .
delivered at this place Apply toCutbbcrt Banks.
Lexington Nov. 28 1808- -
J. 8r D. MaccounRequest those indebted to them to make pay.
inent before the 10th of July, as one of themintends to set out for Philadelphia and New-Yor-
at that time.Lexin glon, Jure 12th, 18C9.
Doctor James OvertonWILL piactice PHYSIC, in Lexington and
its neighbourhood ; he keeps his (hop on Main'treet, nearly opposite the court house ; wherehe has for file an ettenfive flock of
GENUINE MEDICINES;together with a complete alTbrtment of SUR-
GEON'S INSTllUMEN r.S, made aster theVatelr and molt approved models.
To the Public.THE subscriber having opened a shop on Ihe
comer of Limbstone and Water-street- wherehe does all kinds of WHIT SMITH'S WORK,hopes from his knowledge aud attention to busi.ness to meiit a share ot the public patronage.
All 4Bort, plain and ornamental Railings,Grates, Iron Doors, for file proof buildings,Screws of different kind9, and Smith's work in
general, executed with neatness and dispatch, on
the most reasonable terms.N- - B A journeyman and two apprentices
wanting to the above business.Thomas Studman.
just PUBLISHED,And for Sale at this Office,
Pricf 12. Cents,TWO SHOUT CATECHISMS,(DOCTRINAL & HISTORICAL J
Designed fur the religious instiuction of Chil-
dren in some of the most remaikable factsrecoided in the Sacred Scriptures, and inthe first piinciples of the Christian Religion.
BY JOHN ANDREWS.
JUST PUBLISHED,AND FOR SALE AT THIS OFFICE,
BRADFORD'S KFxNTUCKY
ALMANAC,For the vear of our Lord 1810 ;
"CQNTAIMJVG,The Lunations, Conjunctions and Eclip
ses ; ludirment ot the weather ; remarkable days aud nights, togetherwith useful tables and recipes, and agreat variety of entertaing pieces, inprose, and verse.
Frankfort Ware-Hous- e.
THE subscribers are ready to receive Storage of any description, at the usual tatts j
Their Uige and convenient STONE WARE-HOUSE is nearly completed, in the erection ofwhich great care has been taken to render it in-
accessible to sire. A WHARF AND SLIPlias also been made, between the ware houseandthe river, to facilitate the loading of boats in y
stage of the water, which, it is believed, hasthis situation equal, is not superior, to
most places in the uestirn country, for puttinga cargo on board with expedition ar.d in goodorder
Every attention will be paid to meet the wish-
es of their customeis, and punctual attendanceat all times.
WILLIAM HUNTER,JOHN 1NSTONE.
Frankfort, Nov. 29, 1809. ' -- tf
Tobacco, Hemp, Whiskey,Hog's Lap.d, White Beans,and Country made Linew,
WANTED BYLEW IS SANDERS.
Lexington, 1st Jan'y. 1809.
JUST PUBLISHED,AND FOR SALE AT THIS OFFICE,
price 55 centsA SERMON
ON REGENERATION,WITH AN '
APOLOGY and. as ADDRESSTo the Synod, of Kenktucky ;
TOGETHER WITH
AN APPENDIX.BY T.-B- . CRAIGHEAD, A. B. V D. M- -
Charles HumphreysPRACTICES Law in the Fayette and
Jessamine courts. May, 1809.
.JSMMgW't ' 1 'II
STILLS FOR SALE.A TTHE COlTEIt AND TIN MANUTACTO-lt- Y
OF THE SUBSCRIBE 11,
WHO has by the late arrivals received alarrre assortment of COPPER &'TIN. and hasengaged from the Eastward, some of the firstwoikmenin mi line ol trom which circumstance he cin with full confidence assuiehis friends and the public, that any woik doneby him will be executed in a superior manner,to any done in this State heretofore- -
M. FISHEL:N. B. Persons owing the firm of Fishel &
Gallaten,are requested te settle theiraccounts.orthey will aster tliie notice, (is not attended to)be forced. tf
Main street Lexington, 2d Jan'y. 1810. m
A LIST OF LETTERSRemaining in the Post-Offic- e at Lexington, on
the 31st December, 1809; winch is not takenout in three months, will be sent to the Gene-ral Post-Offic- e as dead letters.
AAyres, SamuelAllen, ElizaAllen, WilliamAnderson, John
Brandon, JosephBrandon, bbenezerBushnell, E.B'ach, Joseph
j Bradley, Robert 2Bird, MarkBird, Abraham 2Beaty, CorneliusBoone, SamuelBurton, WilliamBeirvman Samuel aBrumoaragor, Fred- -
eritkBush, William T.Benning, JamesBarbee, JosephBruce, TempeianceBernard, JohnBruce, Benjamin
Carter, Mary C. 3Crockett, Joseph 2Laun, JamesCair, WalterCar, JohnCnsman, JosephCarrick, WilliamColes, EdwardGary, JohnCecil, jr. WilliamClayton, GeorgeCrooks, RobertCarr, AnthonyCole, Le RoyCoffield, BenjaminLabel!, toward ii.
Daily, WilliamDeal, RichardDickenson, ElizabethDunlap, jr. lohnDuval,
Emriss, John
Faver, John 3Fisher,
H. JGardner,
Hill
Hendley,
Martin L.Henderson,
derSSusan
JohnHofkins,Harrison, JohnHunnecutt,Hodgson,
Jones, AsaJolly, Thomas
Kirtley, Francis
Lyforce,V tlliam
William2
Leach,Linsay, Wiljum
MM'Nutt,
business,
Ashby, SarahAndrews, JohnAnderson, James 2
BBadger, John H.Boyle, AdamBlass, AnthonyBell, Montgomery
JohnBryan, Louis
Robert 2
Berryman ThasH.Blaydes, WtilKfruuckanan, Josep hBaldwin, TylerBreckinridge, Mar
ry H.Isaac
Beaty, ElizabethBowler, John T.Bushnell, CharlesBliss, Anthony
C , --"
Comstock, DanielLarson, JamesChiles, Thomas CClinton, JohnChristopher, RobertCollins, LewisCoyle, RebecClark, GeorgeCaldwell, GeorgeCampbell, Dr. J. P,
Crothers, Samuel 3Cunningham, Rob-
ert M. 5Cunningham,ChurchhiII,Mary Hi
DD'Bell,Davis, J. H. 3
Edmondson, John 2
FFeatherhill, Andrew
Gibson, WilliamGanette, James
HHuston, WilliamHugh, John 3Hawkins, MosesHoward,Hall, JamesHarrison, RobertHodgson, JohnHoward, WilliamHuston, RobertHenry, JohnHenry, William 4
JJameson,Jones, William E.
Kerns, James 2
Lara, SamuelLewis, Thomas
JamesLewis, Warner W- - 3Laughlin, Jojin'4
Morrough, Christo
John Furgason, VivianFleming, Leonardi . Fryan, BenjaminFriar, James Fletcher, MaryFriar, Robert Frazer,' Charles C.Flornoy, Matthias .Foster, N.Foid, Thomas R, Fisher, JamesFaulkner, Nelson
Grimes, Linney Griffin, SamuelGrayson, Letitia P.2 Grimes, Chatles B.Guiltner, Barnard Groves! AnnaGreen, William Grubbs, HumphreyGohagan, Anthony Goodman,Gaines Catherine Gist, MordtcaiGraham, George Grimes, Benjamin 2Griffith, Ann Gains, SamuelGain, F. S. Green, Samuel ,
Gray, Jonathan 2 Gayle, Robert D.Goodlett, Adam 2 Gregory, JohnGains,
MaryGillam,
NelsonHammond, LarkinHawkins,
Alexan -
Hill,Harris,
James
JohnM..ry
Harrison, Mary H.Hornecher, John
Johnson, WilliamK
RobinsonLadd,Leuy,Lemon, James
James
Elizabeth
Bolton,
Bledsoe,
Baker,
Emily
George
Mary
George
Long,
M'Clure, James 2M'Kendre, Wil
liam 2
Maxwell, John 2
M'Clure, SamuelM'Lean, Robert DM'Nair, David D.Murphey, JohnMunay,Mrs. J. K.Milee, W illiamMartin, James 1.Morton, JohnMorton, LucyMiller, Robert 15Montague, ClementMurray, CateyMarshal, Marv h..Messick, SamuelMonroe, JohnMason, JohnM'Chm, SamuelM'Chard, PollyMcore, Rev.' James
NNicholas, Eliza R.Nicholas, James
OOutten, LevyOllendorf & Mason- -
Power, Thomas
Rev.
Phillips, Samuel JamesPorter, S. 2 Price, Philemon B.Pane, Fanny M.
Quarlcs,
Russel, Robert S.Runyan, FrancesKielm, Jacob 2Richarson, ThomasRomine. EliasRandol, John
Scott, WilliamSmith, John i- -
Smith, Abn. 1,Smith, Alexr.Smith, AbrahamSmith, GeorgeStong, JohnSayre, JosephSteele, BriceSteele, DavidSutton, William
T
Teirell, JohnThornton, JamesTurner, Lewis ETodd, RobertTegarden,Tarascon, JuA.
Wilson, ReedWilson, MaryWilson, TamesWilson, ThomasWilson, AbrahamvAr:i- - c 1
"Miawu, .jaiiiuciWoods, John.Woods, JamesWoods, WilljamWood, StephenWilliams, HenryWatson. Samuel E.
Mpraisea
State
phcrMatterson GeorgeAiinor,
JamesMinor, GeorgeM'lver.
Jr.Peart,
More, Benjamin
Magill, JamesM'Kee, JohnMarklev, lohn AdarrtMoffutt, CyrusMoss, John JMurdrough, SusanaMurray, JohnMinor, JohnM'Cally, AndrewM'Dowell,Mooney, SimpsonMarkle, Jacob
North, AbrahamNewman,
O'Farrel. lames
Pafiett, Dr.
Kogger
2Richardson, JamesRyan,Relev.Rankin, AdamRollins, Anthony W.
Ths.SSteward, RichardStark, AnnSullivan, GeorgeSteele, WilliamSechrest, WilliamSmith, Alexander S.Stout, PhilemonScott, ArthurScott, WilliamShrlds, John
TTracey, Edw.Tapp, LewisThornley, WilliamTrue, JamesTinsley, John
Walton. WilliamWeeden,NathanielWever, JamesWilkinson, Joseph
aWard, Jamesi..augliuci juacuu
Winters, ElishaWright, HillaryWright, AlexanderWilliams, P.Warner.WilliamWhitlock,
14 hich. an- -
RICH'd. LAFON.
Clarke Circuit,term, 1809.
motion of theit ordered
Lr.uette tor eight weeks
Williams, Wilson D. Wrigglesworth,Wallace, C. B. JohnWrigley, Warble, PhilipWoodson, Addison aWoinack, JohnWhaley, James
York, Bartlet.
NOTICE.ALL persons havirg demands against
estateof Charles Mason, dee'd. are requested toforward them adjusted And all
those indebted to said estate are alsoquested to make immediate pavment, or suitswill be commenced,
JOHN HIGBEE, Ex'r.POLLEY MASON, Exec's.
Fajette County, Jan'y 1810
Taken up by Haydon,in Jestamine county, on South ofcreek, one BLACK MARE, eleven earsold, a small in sorehead, both hindwhite, branded on,the near buttock' shoulder with about
to J uouars.
October 11th, 1809.
of Kentucky,September
W
M'Chord,
H.Tonh
N.
Dr.
Rev.
JoelSenr.
Richardson, H.
Rev
Joel
hands
set.
the
the
come and havethe
Thomasthe Clear
aboutstar feet
and
Joel Collins complainant,Against
Richard S. Hackley, Robeit Patton Greenhow, and Jacob Walsh, jv. defendants.
IN CHANCERY.THE defendants not having entered their
agreeably to law and the rulesthis couit, and itanpearincrto the satisfaction
tf the court they not inhabitants of thisaommonvvealth on theplainant by his counsel,
Gectee
defendants do appear here on.the third dayof our next March term, and answer
copy of this order he in- -- rtea the Kentuckynccessively.
'
2.
2
Banjamin
2
v
2
W
,
1
t 1.v ,
4
u
6
-
)her
J
.
f
s;the com-
plainant's hill j ain
A copy. I est,JAMES ANDERSON, d. c. c. c.
Ten Dollars Reward.STOLENfrom the subscriber, Claike Coun
ty, near Winchester, in the night of the 23da light coloured SORREL MARE,
three J ears old last spring, heavy with foal,about 14 hands 3 inches high, trots and pacesa slow travel on smooth road, walks uncom-monly w ell, star and snip on her sorehead, shewa cut on the ham stiing, ar.d in healing lesttwo lumps very perceivable to be seen, but notrecollected which leg it was on: 'he was docked last spring. Any person delivering said mare10 me snail receive mereasonaale charges paid
W. B.
P
tir
comthat
re.
8th,
fork
that are
id
that
lars more is accompanied by the illian.DONNALDSON
6, 1810. 3t
BLANKS OFFor Sale at
Jame3
Ninian
James
JOHNJanuary
aDOte reward, and alltogether with ten dol.
ALL KINDSthis Office.
. BOCUMEjYTSwhich accompanied the
MESSAGE OF THE PRESIDENT,CONCLUED.
Mr. Smith to Mr. Pinkney.Department of State, Nov. 23, 1809.
Sin,My letters, in the correspondence
with Mr. Jackson, already transmittedto you, sufficiently evince the disap-pointment that was felt, on finding thathe had not been charged to make tothis government either the frank ex-
planations or the liberal propositions,which the occasion manifestly required.Instead of this obvious course of pro-
ceeding, it was in the outset perceiv-ed that his object was to bring 113 to resume the subjects of the arrangementot April, in a way that would implythat we were aware that the arrange-ment was not binding on his govern-ment, because made with the knowledgeon our part that Mr. Erskinc had noauthority to make it, and thus to con-
vert the responsibility of his govern-ment for the disavowal injo a reproachon this for its conduct in the transactiondisavowed.
In the first instance it was deemedbest rather to repel his observations
than to meet them asan offensive insinuation." 'This forbear-ance had not the expected effect of re-
straining him from a repetition of theoffence. And even on his further in-
sinuations nothing more was done thantopremonish him of the inadrhissibiltyof s'o indecorous a course of proceed-ing. This also being without effect,nothing remained but the step finallytaken. And there was the less hesi-tation in shutting the door to furtheropportunities for insulting insinuations,as the disclosures he had made and thespirit of his discussions had So entirelyshut it to the hope of any favorable re-
sult from his mission.I will not dwell on his reluctance to
give up the uncertainties of verbal, forthe precision of written discussion, rot-o-
the manner or the time of hjs denialthat he had given any 100m at all for aStatement, which, in order to guard
the misconceptions incident tiverbal conferences, had placed beforthim in writing, with a request that hewould point out any inaccuracies, andto which he did not then object other-wise than by intimating, that he couldnot ha e the statement with the particu-lar view nbfeb seemed to be suppostdin or win 1 cnvcii on the various instances in which partial or inconsistentviews of the subject have taken placeof its real merits. But it may libt beamiss to make some observations onthe correspondence, as it relates to thejustification of bis government in havingaisavoweu tne act ot ins predecessor.
With respect to the orders in coun-cil, the ground of the disavowal ib thedifference between the arrangement andthe piinted despatch of Mr. Canningto Mr. Erskineof the 23d of January.According to this despatch, then, thearrangement sailed in three points :
I. In not relinquishing the trade ofthe United States with enemies' colo-nies.
With respect to this point it is neces-sary at this time to discuss the right tothat trade. It is sufficient to remark,1st. That as the trade is admitted tohave become in the yiew of Gieat Brit-ain of little practical importance, whyhas it been made a ground of the disa-vowal, and, especially, as importantconsiderations only could, upon princi-pie- s
ofpublic law, have justified a mea-sure of so serious a character I 2d.That as the colonial trade is a subjectnowise connected either with the or-
ders in council or with the affair of theChesapeake, why has it been permittedto frustrate an arrangement relating tothose subjects, Sc t6 those only ? 3d. Thatas this condition is alledged to have ori-ginated in a supposition that it wouldbe agreeable to the American govern-ment, why has it been persisted in as-
ter the error was made known by therepresentation of Mr. Erskine to hisgovernment, that neither this nor theother conditions of the despatch of the2 ?d of January, were attainable heiq?
2. Another point in the despatch andnot in the arrangement is, that the Brit-ish navy might capture our trade toports prohibited by the. United States.
This condi'tion too, appears to havehad its origin in a mistake of ypurmeaning in a conversation with Mr.Canning, as noted by yourself, and inan inference thence deduced as to thedisposition of this government. Butthis double mistake milst have beanbrought to light in time to have beencorrected in the new mission. Inurging it, Mr. Canning has "taken aground forbidden by those principlesof decorum which regulate and markthe proceedings of governments to-
wards ench othc. In his despatch the
cadition iS suted to be for the pur-pose of securing the bona side mte.ntr.itofLvmeiica to prevent her citizensfrmn tiading with France and certainotlret pou crs ; in other words, to se-cure. pledge to that effect against themalmie intention of the United Sute.Andftrib despatch too, was anthoiizedto beommunicated in cxtensto, to thegovernment of which (.such languagewas usid. M ight it no't have been
that such a conditionand such o6servations would ..t least,on suchn occasion, have been Rivenup by a gjvernment willing to smooththe way an amicable settlement ofexisting diYcrences ?
In his ztal to vindicate his govern-ment, Mr.sSickson too has attempteda gloss on thii most extraordinary ideaof calling oiifefoi-tig- soveieignty, notinueeci to mat- - jaws tor us, but whatis equivalent! principle, to supply aMjjjjiuseu iii.;uiiryHe calls suchhis government
to theiiAm:
11.
olan execution of tl. e
had taken place on
tw 01 congiess, out ot a 1 ompactbinding as a pubic law on both panic-- ,and which bodi Vuuld have a common
in seeingVluIy executed. Onhis own principleltheie ought to be areciprocity, nof onV j tiie executionof the compacts buU, the obligationand interest res ikinkfrom it. Besides,where there is a recVocily in com-pac- ts
between nitions touching attri-butes of soveieignty, tte is always asmuch of the sovereignty gained as isparted with, sq tint there be no loss orindignity on eitheride.
3. The remaininVpoint in the des-patch not secuicd by! the arrangement,is that which requiie that whilst ourprohibotory laws shouM be repealed asto Great Britain, they slouid be lest inforce as to 1 ranee aid the powersadopting or acting iindeKher decrees.
This is the conditionWliich aloneproperly belongs to the sulject, and itis to be remarked, in the'first place,that the British project, of vtfiich thiscondition makes a part, contemplatedtwo things in their nature incompati-ble ; one a repeal of the prohibitoryacts as to Great Biitam without waitingfor the conclusion of a regular treaty ;the other a pledge or engagement fortheir continuance as to the other
Now, from the nature of our con-stitution, which, in this particular,ought to have been attended to by theBritish government, it is manifest, thatthe executive could have given no sdehsledge, that the continuance of the
being a subject of legis-lative consideration, could not havebeen provided for until the meeting ofthe legislature, and tht the conditioncould not therefore but have sailed, ei-ther jin the immediate renewal of com-merce with Great Britain, or in theim-medik- e
engagement that it should notbe lehewed with France.
ThJ: British government ought tohave atquiesced in, and indeed oughtto hav been satisfied with, the attain-ment ohhe important object of an im-mediate repeal of our prohibitory laws,and with the consideration that the oth-er objcc, not immediately attainable,was unnecessary at the time, becausethe prohibition as to France was thenin force, and because there was everyreason to, infer, not only from thufact,but from the spirit of the communica-tions made from time to time, and fromthe ovrrturcs before submitted to theBritish government, that, without arepeal of the French decrees, our pro-hibotory laws would be continued inforce against Fiance, and especially inthe case of a repeal of the Britih orders,would necessarily render a continuanceof the French decrees doubly obnoxi-ous.
But is on this head doubts could havebeen entertained, instead of 1 ejectingthe arrangement, ought not the repeal-ing act on our part to have been metwith a suspension at least of the ordersin council until it could have been seenwhether the law wouldor would not have been continued
France. Such a suspensioncould not haiys given in any point ofview more advantage to the UnitedStates than was given to Great Britainby the repeal, which
execute
interest
pow-ers.
men part.Is this reasonable course could rjot
have been substituted for the disavowal,why was not a final disavowal suspend-ed with a proposition that the arrange,menr. would be executed by Great Brit,ain, in the event of a compliance on thepart of the United States with the con-dition required as to France.
I am not unaware, you may be told,that the law of the U.States did not extend to Holland,though so intimately connected withFrance, and so subservient to her decrees against neutral commerce.
It would not be improper on this oc-casion to observe, that this obj etion.. in be the less urged by Great B-l- f J(n,