1 unclassified naa8 3qa*9e o;/ hl4 schematic of orsat apparatus 6 5 schematic of particulate...

*D-*2O9 s O5 & O ETIG*-II

1 UNCLASSIFIED NAA8 3qA*9E O;/ HL

i~ 4 1- " 2.2

1111, 2 5 11111 4 U

W

AD-A209 500

AM,

#WON$T orpe sof Sec

-we.. ....

6, 0

When ~ l~tl$:oWr, ---#resed for anyethe' t* 4~Ift4Jt~ven~ow*~t oprton, the

l'r~l* ts -d~ iI#~pern.Th factImR. weyl supli tte drawi ng,

**~* .~h*~ ~erperson or~ w ~ ~ *t~s ~ ctuwe, use, or

stilaV~ p~~ttI 'het~4i ~yy ~related fhrto.

The 01ti, vfr Al rts inthis publication is forfor .41not t or Viecomendation

Thsrprthsbe rviee andr Fris prvdfrpbiain

Air~ ~~~~~~~~~I Forc intlali ydrc eussfrcpe ftis reportbl tothe Ocatianarol ndI Ehvro0na Heal hee irto will beL)vLibry Brookse

Tso rot ,ats ftred and s approhis for tubliDefeneTchia

ftIM c, s copies of this report f etioal

Tedhnlit Int* -%1iw 00te~(U). Port Itoyal Road, Springfield VA

,-. LASSiFIED ____

SE L iT c iFICTIO OFTI-.IS PAZIE

Fom ApprovedREPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE fM OMNo 0,10.4 0 d8

1 RPR fyRITY CLASSIFICATION lb RESTRICTIVE MARINGS

a~ss led N/A2aX RT LSIIAINAUTHORITY 3 DISTRIBUTION /AVA LABioTY OF REPORT

Approved for public release.2b DECLASSIFICATION /DOWNGRADING SCHEDULE Distribution is unl imi ted.N/A _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

4 PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER(S) 5 MONITORING ORGANiZA T ON REPORT NUMBER(S)AFOEHL Report 89-031EQ0079DEF

6a NAME OF PERFORMING ORGANIZATION 16b OFFICE SYMBOL 7a NAME OF MONITORING ORGANIZATION

AF Occupational and Environ- (if applicable)mental Health Laboratory. EC

6c. ADDRESS (City, State, and ZIP Cod.) 7b ADDRESS (City, State. and ZIP Code)

BrooksAFBTX_78235-5501 ___8b ____ OFFICE YMBOL 9PROCUREENT :NTR'______IDENTFICATIONUMBEBa. NAME OF FUNDING, SPONSORING 8bOICSYBL 9ROUEETNRUNTEflCTONUMR

ORGANIZATION f(if applicable)

Same as 6a ________ _________________________9c- ADDRESS (City, State and ZIP Code) 10 SOURCE OF FUNDING NoNMBERS

ELEGRMEN NO OA NOS AWO UNPROGEM PROEC NAS WCO UN

Same as 6c II I II11. TITLE (include Security Claw ification)

Source Emission Testingi of Classified Waste Incineratnr- r~riffi-z AFR MY12 PERSONAL AUTHOR(S)

Capt Paul T. Scott __3TM OEEI 3a. TYPE OF REPORT 1 b TMCOED114 O'ATE OF RE'IORT (Yea#r,. onth. a)I P AGE COUNT

Final FROM gpT9 April 1989 71 5316 SUPPLEMENTARY NOTATION

17 COSATi CODES 18 SUBIECT TERMS (Continue on reverse if neceuir) m(d identify by block number)FIELD GROUP iSUB-GROUP Emission Testing Comnli~2ncc Tcsting

Classified Waste Air Quality

19 ABSTRACT (Continue on crerie if necessary and identify by block number)

At the request of 416 Strategic Hospital/SGPB, personnel of the AFOEHL Air QualityFunction conducted source emission testing for particulates, AC1, and opacity on theclassified waste incinerator at Griffiss AFB. The New York Department of EnvironmentalConservation (NYDEC) required testing for permit compliance.

Particulate Emissions were well above the emission limits allowed by the State of NewYork. Action is recommended to bring the classified waste zncinerator into compliance.

20 DiSTRIBUTION/AVAiLABILiTY OF ABSTRACT 21 ABSTRACT SECuRiTy (A -SS.I CATION

fl UNCLASSIFsEDdJ!jiIMIfED [ SAME AS RPr 0J DrIC USERS Unclassified22a NAME OF RESPONSIBLE :NDIvIDUAL 22b TELEPHONE (include Area Code) F22c OFFICE SYMBOL

Capt Paul T. Scott (512) 536-289 AV209AOHIC00 Form 1473, JUN 86 Previous editions are obsolete SE, Ti Y (I ASS.FCATiO.N l'C.,

UNCLASSIFIED

CONTENTS

Page

DD Form 1473 iIllustrations iv

I. INTRODUCTION 1

11. DISCUSSION I

A. Background IB. Site Description 1C. Applicable StandardsD. Sampling Methods and Procedures 3

III. CONCLUSIONS 4

IV. RECOMMENDATIONS 5

References 9

Apcndix

A Test Participants 11B State Regulations 15C Sampling Port Locatien 210 Sampling Data and Calculations 25E Calibration Data 47

Distribution List 53

AccesioI F0,

J J DTIC TAL

".,..+._ I Jt'.+td1,'tiujL

By

Avl-J3blity Codes---] , +- - - --- -Avdii ,,d/or

iii

ILLUSTRATIONS

Figure Title Page

1 View of Classified Waste Incinerator Building and Stack 22 View of Incinerator 33 Schematic of Grab Bag Sampling Train 54 Schematic of ORSAT Apparatus 65 Schematic of Particulate Sampling Train 7

Table

1 Summary of Emission Data 82 Stack Emission Test Results 8

iv

I. INTRODUCTION

On 19-23 Sep 88, a stationary source sampling survey for opacity,particulate emissions, and hydrogen chloride emissions was conducted on thenew classified waste incinerator at Griffiss AFB NY by personnel from the AirQuality Function of the AF Occupational and Environmental Health Laboratory(AFOEHL). This survey was requested by the 416 Strategic Hospital/SGPB via HQSAC/SGPB to meet permit requirements established by the New York StateDepartment of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC). Personnel involved withon-site testing are listed in Appendix A.

II. DISCUSSION

A. Background: Griffiss AFB had an accumulated amount of classifiedwaste material which needed to be destroyed. A shredding machine had beenused, but was inadequate; and, the accumulation was considered a potentialsecurity risk. Before placing a new classified waste incinerator on line, theNYSDEC ordered compliance testing as a condition for obtaining an operatingpermit. Compliance testing included opacity, particulate emissions, andhydrogen chloride (HCl) emissions. HCl was a concern because of the potentialfor incinerating small percentages of classified microfiche and otherchlorinated plastics.

B. Site Description: The classified waste incinerator is located ,rseparate building approximately 50 yards east of bldg 19. Figure I is aphotograph of the incinerator building and stack. The incinerator, ModelCAI-750-MI, was manufactured by Advanced Combustion Systems, Bellingham,Washington and has no pollution control equipment. A view of the incineratorcan be seen in Figure 2. The following are operating parameters:

1. Two-chamber design

2. Fired by #2 fuel oil

3. Load capacity

a. 500 lbs/hr for type 0 waste

b. 750 lbs/hr for type 1 waste

C. Applicable Standards: The monitoring requirements and regulations foropacity and particulates are defined under Codes, Rules, and Regulations ofthe State of New York, Title 6, Chapter Ill--Air Resources, Subchapter A--Prevention and Control of Air Contamination and Air Pollution, Part 219.Appendix B has a copy of the applicable state laws. Particulate emissions arebased on a charge of 300 lbs per hour and are extrapolated from Figure I ofAppendix 2 in Part 219. There are no applicable standards for chlorideemissions but testing for chlorides was requested. Proposed new incineratoremission standards (Part-219.5) do not a.ply to existing Type 0 wasteincinerators. The following is a summary of the applicable standards:

1. Particulate emissions: 0.85 lbs/hr

2. Opacity: not to exceed 20% or No. 1 on the Ringleman Chart

Figure 1: Classified Waste Incinerator Building and Stack

2

Figure 2: Vim of Incinerator

D. Sampling Methods and Procedures

New York State Codes, Rules, and Regulations, Title 6, Chapter III--Air Resources, require that emission testing be conducted in accordance withAppendix A to Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 60 (40 CFR 60).Therefore, sample train preparation, sampling and recovery, calculations andquality assurance were done in accordance with the methods and proceduresoutlined in 40 CFR 60, Appendix A.

For testing purposes, the incinerator was operated with Type 0 wasteat a load rate of 300 lbs/hr, although the maximum rated load was 500 lbs/hr.Griffiss AFB personnel were unable to provide an estimate of the amount orfrequency in which they would burn, since they had not operated the

3

incinerator previously. It was determined that 300 lb/hr would more than asufficient charge. This change was coordinated with the State -h thestipulation that the load rate used for testing would be the ma, mum load ratefor future incinerator use.

Sampling ports were already in place approximately 4.5 duct diametersdownstream and 1.5 duct diameters upstream from any flow disturbance. Based onthe inside stack diameter, port locations, and type of sample (particulate), 24four traverse points (12 per diameter) were used to collect a representativeparticulate sample. Appendix C shows a typical stack cross section and theactual traverse point locations for each stack surveyed.

Prior to testing, cyclonic flow was determined and a velocity pressuretraverse was accomplished. A grab sample for Orsat analysis (measures oxygenand carbon dioxide for stack gas molecular weight determination) was takenduring each sample run. Orsat sampling and analysis equipment are shown inFigures 3 and 4. Flue gas moisture content, needed for determination of fluegas molecular weight determination, was obtained during particulate sampling.

Particulate samples were collected using the sampling train shown inFigure 5. The train consisted of a button-hook probe nozzle, heated stainlesssteel probe liner, heated glass filter, impingers, and a pumping and meteringdevice. The nozzle was sized prior to each sample run so that the gas streamcould be sampled isokinetically; in other words, the velocity at the nozzletip was the same as the stack gas velocity at each point sampled. Flue gasvelocity pressure was measured at the nozzle tip using a Type-S pitot tubeconnected to a 10-inch inclined-vertical manometer. Type K thermocouples wereused to measure flue gas as well as sampling train temperatures. The heated,stainless steel-lined probe was used due to the extremely high stacktemperature. The heated filter was used to collect particulates and passcondensable materials. The impinger train (first, third and fourth impingerswere modified Greenburg-Smith type; second impinger stdndard Greenburg-Smithdesign) was used as a condenser to collect stack gas moisture and condensableparticulates. The first and second impingers were filled with 200 ml each of0.100 N sodium carbonate to collect any HCl. The third and fourth impingerswere empty and contained 200 grams of indicating silica gel, respectively, tocollect any remaining moisture. The pumping and metering system was used tocontrol and monitor the sample gas flow rate. Each of the three tests were 84minutes in duration.

Emission calculations were done using "Source Test Calculation andCheck Programs for Hewlett-P~rkard 41 Calculators" (EPA-340/-85-018)developed by the EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, ResearchTriangle Park NC. All field data and resulting emission calculations arepresented in Appendix D. Calibration Data is presented in Appendix E.

Ill. CONCLUSIONS

The emission survey results did not satisfy the New York State's emissionlimits. Opacity was well within limits and did not exceed 5% at any timeduring the test. However, particulate emissions were well above the limit.

4

The high particulate emissions were somewhat of a surprise since the opacityaveraged near zero. The average particulate emission was 2.6677 lbs/hrcompared to the limit of 0.85 lbs/hr. The average HCl emission rate was0.01579 lbs/hr. The stack emission test results can be found in Table 2.

IV. RECOMWNDATIONS

The Classified Waste Incinerator is not in compliance with particulateemission limits. Considering the incinerator is new and of good design, it isnut obvious where the problem may lie. The particulate collected wasprimarily a white ash so incineration was complete. However, it was observedthat forced air to the primary chamber caused turbulence in the chamber andcould be sending ash up the stack. The design of the chamber should limitexit gas velocities such that nonoxidized particulate matter and ash are notentrained in the exhaust gases and carried up to the secondary chamber and outthe stack. Perhaps an adjustment here might alleviate the problem. Also,further reducing the charge rate may bring emissions below standards.Finally, we recommend a re-evaluation of the incinerator after NYSDEC actionor any procedural or equipment adjustments have been accomplished.

? r /r

Tet f

Figure 3: Schematic of Grab Bag Sampling Train

<t

, , /

IN.:. --- ________

2 ~r ~;

- ~

) -

I

I

Figure 4: Schematic of ORSAT Apparatus

6

LLLL

ZL

-J

u < LW

uj z0 0,

>C

I- -

LLI V)

41)0 L mU

LU C

LU Q)

UL<- LU0

LUJ

m z

00 a-

Ix7

TABLE 1

SUMMARY OF EMISSION DATA

RUN CHARGE PERCENT SAMPLE STACK GAS PARTICULATE CHIPRIDE# RATE ISOKINETICS VOLUME FLOW RATE CATCN CtiTCH(lbs/hr) M% (dscf) (dsctm) (mng) (g

1 300 P8.85 14. 161() 1255 681.5 .7 R Z4

2 30n q9c9.2 ro5.4670 12% 60.1.428'?

1 100 102.87 23.88() 1168 ~ 4 44 . I

V'ABLF: 2

STACK F.MISSrON TEST RESULTSGRIFFISS AFB CLASSIFIED WASTE INCINERATOR

RIIN STACK GAS PART I (111 ; 'l F3FM I S, I WlJ Fm I cS I IrQS ST A Nl);P1)S

4J~ 7((I( b'' hI I lbc:/hl (Y ot N)

1 8.7 1(K6 3.1,2 (.)1 3414 N

2 10) .1W 1 (W15 N

3 Q.5 6 (). 141 N

AVERAGE 2.66// 0.01 W9 N

REFERENCES

1. Code of Federal Regulations. Vol 40, Parts 53-60, The Office of theFederal Register National Archives and Records Service, General ServicesAdministration, Washington DC, July 1987.

2. Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems - VolumeIII, Stationary Source Specific Methods, US Environmental ProtectionAgency, EPA-600/4-77-027-b, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina,December 1984.

3. Source Test Calculation and Check Programs for Hewlett-Packard 41Calculators, US Environmental Protection Agency, EPA-340/1-85-O18,Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, May 1987.

9

(This page left blank)

10

APPENDIX A

Test Participants

11


12

L

1. AFOEHL Test Team

Maj James A. Garrison, Chief, Air Quality FunctionCapt Paul T. Scott, Consultant, Air Quality MeteorologistTSgt Benjamen Hernandez, Environmental Quality TechnicianSSgt Daniel Schillings, Industrial Hygiene Technician

AFOEHL/ECQBrooks AFB TX 78235-5501

Phone: AUTOVON 240-2891

Commercial (512) 536-2891

2. Griffiss AFB On-site Representatives

Capt Richard Tourjee 416 Strategic Hospital Griffiss/SGPBMSgt Donald Watkins AUTOVON 587-3617

Ms Gilda Bielba 416 CSG/DADMr Ryan Ziminski AUTOVON 587-7708

Mr Bruce Mero 416 CSG/DEEVMr Fred Conover AUTOVON 587-2098

Mr Walt Hyde 416 CSG/DEMM

3. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (Region 6)

Mr David Prosser, PE (via phone)Regional Air Pollution Engineer(315) 785-2513

Mr David HathawayPrincipal Engineering Technician(315) 793-2554

13


14

APPENDIX B

State Incinerator Regulations

15


16

461:0554 STATE AIR LAWS

V'ART 218X processing cargo. controlling cargo teCrM- 11 1-1cr 1Jt!:Cl N&Ii cisIctI cIs k% h 1 11 C 1 tfIn

~E11ICLES PROPELLED BY perature: construction; lumbering: oil or inciouril shicisr in Fieurt I'DIESEL ENGINFS gas well servicing: farming: or when oper- (C) No.i~c~~o ha% in2 a It-ipaciits t

ation of the engine is required for the 1,0(i lb/br ocr less aind hu it o'r installed(Effective Mal, 1, 1972; May 10, 19811 purpose of maintenance. hC1\%wei cApril 1. 1962, -,cid Jacnri 1.

(d) Fire. police and public utilit% trucks 1 96,1 shall be (ipera!tel .a ti produceS.cionj 21si.1 \ pplicalhiliry I his lPr or other chictcs are pcrforrrcing emergen- part calcite cmiscccc cc iskh e\scd 0.s,

skil~ll cIjlpkl tio 1l1 %chlies rrccpclled h ;I cy services. Ili hir icr ctrr IM)1 lb'hr ,! icicise ec:cre'cd.diesel crivi cc. c\,ciccclc cc niarine c ses (c) Trucks owAned or operated b% per- tin cc aes cc icii o irder h% fc! cnnisccc

son.s engaged in mining and quarrNing are prTo ki (s cohef r,\i, ic.231h.2 I ,hititrions. (a) No pro % used within the confines of such persons' (d) A nsi cnccmcritccr ha .in ri capcicitN I),nci ii p c s ,ic: I -Ichikhl prcopelled property. 2.000i Ih/hr ior less iccd t-il (,rcc iristalieci

h.\ ., diecc.- .iilif- k,%n' i Iris.(Las ori (I \ niuck i, it, rein ccl.> lo!' c prioir III April 1, 19)62 , sl> eitber miect III,,

dI,ci~'C1 LI;c 011 :.1, o :he ompr apparet of l if C \ pCe~llI! Ilk 1T.J1,d'Iui, requicremcents cif 21 9 4,cc or shall F,dt~f:JlII: 'I cotr,: w :,theopeatin o' %hlLI prtof lice ocrcblecct cellcpercciccre cs Ckuipped vit(. adei.-uate control devices or

t: %Ckl LIL cc.;'e lIed .. cdcelegncch cninw :ci 1% ohIc (ccc i\cenis ICc &cec red-escecced aiid rebijibt s,, : tic rnc thei, p1./icrr 2. shll ocprtc said IAlireclcect rcqccrciieflt, (,f 219.41,1 cI f\Jjnuar\ 1.%clccec or c;ik- I-c h c b1e crd Ited. - 1969.in tccch af iincr i e.. \ha~st cccccssioccs II c ol~ii-arLr-,rt-n10

.shade~l *l I(dccfi or ire% equal I,, (,r VAR T 219 cNicrccrt Iirrthn .01lb 1 cr h xrecr c ccl~\ t; hocili c -ce N A'-l 1.

ereccierIr tthiN nde Icice lcn IN(INI-R NI ORS I )t anrd .cias I )( l~h cthacr: o- cq jo ilLn s .cndkarclccpd hl to J'Lflective MIaN 1. 1972) operated No ais to pro'duLeL P~crtiCUIaJthe oc- cc'' prccdcced lcr a :,)I iccisscccins Mcicich cceed 0.3 lb 'hr for everyicnuoci- percod cc: ''ire th an fo e cee,'nd. Stection 219.1 l'itle. -[ ic ritle, htl : 0 1(1 ih 'icr of refuse Lh,11reecJ ules1cs ai hna'l%%hcencl t1c in utcon Isoic sccNi cr tierdst r-order h\ the cicnncmccccr cc ie

jl No ;,crscci cc'. 0%i fs. operites orT kcnt or polljiion from icc'er'ctors re poic

tici nu r trt,.. ihe mice pcower fcor 2119.2 \pplicahle geographical area. lli (III vl n cccccr.it or loerthan 2'.0cc~.ci~~jci~ riu cdei h dcseienoric r cba arts~ci clrto ltce encicre Sltte 'If Nc-cc lb'hJr Cjfaaci and tauit -.-cor to ..\rct 1.

kcc it. c ossir ocee_-;pies I.nd ccci h:cs, the Yiork i'c 2 sh-11 cilcr mreel the recuicemeniCts oflicc~~~ L:~o~2cccicdi c ,crIM" 219.3 Defiinitions, cci rlcccieraitiir. *\ic 2 )c9 4 kec or shalt he Vt 'ccr1_ it adC

I-rilil) f ! uortrk-, rven !rcceiicr or lccrccaece icc cc li ciicnicticcfl q;ac couccrol le\c- icr' rcdecincd onccc''cis cu til cccc~ie picieror ctcclc akes plce ;ind] Ispcfl. 1. 2. 3. ir .4 refusec is reluilt sic S tcc wncr'e the 'carmnso

5.1c! crc crtruk roc ided hc J dcese-l Ised afucel. alonce Ofccl cc onliccntcccc cith 2(19 -4(h) hi- Jianrr 1. 1-0.CfnLine. shaell ;dcc orpermit the die-I 'isc "' c

..... Irr t!c~ ic defrmr Weluc\lccc'itreci.ilcinc 219.5 Smoke vinis%jfs. (a) NO ifl-:11X f ccseeic micutcs scIcen the- hucs hut noit tccccc:tt It'. eioe ithsc c-viric, u;cccs~h le iu

ocr inc. I, m,: fli-. imikrro . except a,, eclroi r1iie stree .itinc.ccrc c.( rcardlcs' ,I s I. 0SIf I 'itciccercc. penicted h 0-ecccn21 3,Ndx Trt: ecleiini d.,i cck ifci c~et c'rt itr

21S.3 Exception%. The nroIHI'litions cif \kicrlacc cth I cctcle 1. .\prtnci\s2 e:crNc cttePi~cn ci:isubdicisicic (h) of scecicic: 21NS.2 shiall nit (ci Sinicke *\cc air eonrccimnil Lop- e'ic et cdrnrni ce tn 1il

appls ishez sisicsl of scriiill ensi,-borne particles nemild dciticicis

iJ Aan " IIN I ,),e t e ,:, l air c.ont ,iii;,it ii w icn in sial

n c c cz c n l e s b c i n s e o f , t r f h et o n d i t i o n s t 1 - e n t n u i c bl e r t o I e Iic c r c h i r cj. o fwei/ .I1 hill b e icic 5cc -. - . Icc:! s wIs ukcihrccli i-. oc a caccr thertcif has ro 219.4 Lms.o limits. (a %1 \ir ofc - i~c~ denser ihc- 40 percent or

rcr cciner~tr fii.rL ci ct 2.(' In i- c \ N0 O'' IL kitclri- i.r; or

cuircstcc:tccn re- d(~ hl ecsccnccl. lsccit,Ucc. U T 'C :jw ci j t'inct Wd ;C , I 'I L. r"Id opeCr~ctcd ti cice!t lie c:;'ic ccccccipr,! ire icr pissencce eccc''!crt TI. r(* 211)J., 1 ests. (,t) \ Ii ic. nrccirs, Ilaner

ilccI '- sf~l ' -d in sed h)scc o;~ (h No ineirirtur tzrccr n,!- '.! t 2.'lt hrc'lcc cipeICIc sill be testedsii ~~c ,~ ni %nr.~e hii: ccf ictc If cc iiiisai ul l ci cxscpcc te:ccniicc inirdiincct ii es; proedcrs ieep

,,lt::r,:~ x .c io Ic cl i !,h hi7 l~l e ciri:C(i sc i , ', ,i( 0,Icicle : icch theL prccccciccssccci

Ic A diesel engine is being used to %PcAl iniinceraitors built or insTcciledpr-ovide. poiser for nn aauccicars Purpose, ,illc Icxiizir.% 1. 196S. and t-tc in acuiisucb as le :5dn : dsI rgin. niixini or 'Sce. ckci~iic I, IJ 01)i tIIihr (if l 1ess scal b tested in

17

NEW YORK AIR POLLUTION RUL, S-729____________________________________________________461 .0555

oiccrdancet ss ith speCidl teS: proccdures rn,% hascv test, condu..ted The o" ner sh~:i C ItI Cor cmi :,swIi !V,! \ud,: ptpromnulgated by the commissioner. Units pros idc. at his expense. samiplinig hoales ino.r sckarq. rc_.,. :c:acdCMcmr o;jr It1IJ'Fss lich are rctpresentative nwdc) ni ' he pecrtinent allied facilities as needed. at the ;in% ekjji mcni or .oni ri; u,r.-:ncn:tes~ted instead of an actual in.tallation, in rcuues! of the commissioner. sh iCh ULse! , opcra tct No *is It' :JUSLaccordaricc %% ith special test procedures (h) If saIC) Icsts ifldjitc a cvfltra' eflt %I'dal~on

proniuhated lix the commissioner of) thc cnisioji limits. thc Coii,,wl

'IV.7 Abatement. (a) \\ hertz comn- cor, rol epUrlnient ut I, ma i scal I!,, - Id hr iiii.c i.x r

nilioner has. reason to btliese tha: on ir.- cincratr if suc:h equiplent I., nor t iC i'c ii.'c, in, rr11 rrc: or i:i'a

cineratior Installation is ' slatin! 't:e vsirhi, t time 1;nwi specd III% th cF--iirrl:5. '~-

etisr. taindards 0f setion 21'.)- he is'c '1,

APPENDIX 2

IN -NiFR : -,) r~uDEIPARTICU'ZA7E EWMSSION RATE VS REFUSE CH-'RCGED

-~~~ -i -__ -HI' I .-" -__-- __--

itt

fiti itT

I 5 .

____0 10 wp IWPiX~ ___

2-2 -E ,,: __ THESUF__ O NTIOA AI Pf INC Vvzismt c: r-

461 05516 STATE AIR LAWS

TABiLE 1

c1a.4s~iebofl of Uetum%~

L I-

PART 2:20 (1) For the purpose o this Part. the (21 Feed to tnei klin Tric %kreh, o'Z'V't'1 L-4NP CEM~ENT PLANTS foiio~ino detnitions also appl\ matcriiL excluding fuels znd .-zc,-

tE;rfv .'.iijrch 16, 197 3; NMN 10, 1984 (I ,Dr.% procss portiand cement, piant bined \\aic,. introduced into :nri 'Ki~r ,A portland ccmen: plan: uhere thc ra ing the time \4her 2 s.;nek sample is being

Sein U. Dehinitions. F - the matcrial kii feed enterinj ithe lkr Ir -- ta7 rer~ecmha~ ~: e

','U-POX: 0 In- Fa: r entr.j ef~ i- p..,'der fhrni hias a moisture COntent! Or One lions 22C and 220 31 of th" P.,-.

lti osf"a, ~t~. pcrcent: or, ies, L,. (si:3) L p~cr condi;tior n~ ",!I% u~.

Lrnnepn?

1 9


20

APPENDIX C

Sampling Port Location

21


22

DETERMINATION OF MINIMUM NUMBER OF TRAVERSE POINTS

Stack ID: ___.. .. __.__ _ Stack diameter at ports: j .j (ft)

Distance A (ft) -___, (duct diameters) /7<

Recommended number of traverse points as determined by

distance A:

Distance B (ft) _ (duct dianeters)

Recommended number of traverse points as determined by

distance B:

Number of traverse points used: -.

23


24

APPENDIX D

Sampling Data and Calculations

25


26

PRELIMINARY SURVEY DATA SHEET NO. I(Stack Geometry)

SOURE NIMBERINSIDE STACK DIAMETER

U ' .DV/ )*( '\(,. Inches

DERCENCEoFROM TANCE FROM TOTAL DISTANCESFDOMDOATSTDR

POINT DIAMETER INSIDE WALL OF NIPPLE TO SAMPLING POINT(Inches) (Inches)

47 1

-1 ---- 3

OE L ______' 1570 27 ____ _________

PRELIMINARY SURVEY DATA SHEET NO. 2(Velocity and Temperature Traverse)

BASE DTE

INSIDE STACK DIAMETER

STAI $ON PRESSURE

.2fi 3 In HVISTACK STATIC PRESSURE

-- 01 .5In 1120SAMPLING T.AM

TRAVERSE POINT NUMBER VELOCITY HEAD, Vp IN H 20 V' ,V STACK TEMPERATURE %OF)

fT_ _¢z,, _ :/. _ )

_,_._. ! A/. (1 ,-

-3 _ -7___... .. ___ .-

5I. ... .(71 _ /1":: ,___ _ _ _ _"q"S

7 •_ _ '- _ _ _ _,

/ I ___ ____ __ __ .----

AVERAGE

,..,,, PM 28 ..-

AIR POLLUTION PARTICULATE ANALYTICAL DATA

HA3E DATE RUN NUMBER

Aw45 AF 22 e." Oe +BUILDING NUMBER 'SOURCE NUMBER

. PARTICULATES

FINAL WEIGHT INITIAL WEIGHT WEIGHT PARTICLESITEM I0 ) ln') (t l

FILTER NUMBER

ACETONE WASHINGS (Probe. Fwnr

Half Filter) /2 (/'(, /4/H IF

BACK HALF I|1 r(eit ed)

Tot.l W .,ght of Paric.li es Collected

II, WATER

1 FINAL WEIGHT INITIAL WEIGHT WEItH"

WATERITEM

IMPINGER 2<..',, 2 2H ,1 07

,MPINGER 3 (D-.) ,

IMPIN:-ER 4 (Siibc. Gel)

Total Weiglht of Wote Collected I ( f

II. GASES (Dn)

ITEM ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS AVERAI 2 3 4 E

_ _ o _ - _ _ _ _ I. -' + * ,*,1

'.OL CO

VOL. N,

Vol % N? (100% - ,CO 2 % O 7 % CO)

AMD FEM84 651 REPLACES OEHL 20. MAY 78. WHICH IS OPSOLETE

29

(. br0 - uP-

0 Vz _ _ _ _ -- -

__C~

Z M x J 4W % V2n w -w -

wZ L..... 0 C). z -

U) >At-

I-. .

-j~

UAa 0us > r-r

uu

(NZ00

LL Wa

-~el ---- -

II

\Vu r-S A~ ~ __ - -

30

. - - t

-I LH

W

J X -I.-

<1j La

I- *?- In IJ

- (n C7G OL (Y -.

-~ -i

C~ 4

-I I'CL +. UL

w

- -u I

<3

PUN NUMSEP

M:-TCF BOXA 7Ap PI,,

fF

nrTF -Ei,

IlbII F

4 2 *5

T'

32

VISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION FORM 4 No.

CMPANY NAME O B S E R V A T IO N

D END TIME

STREET ADDRESS SEC 0 is 30 45 COMMENTS

MIN C OIMENS

0 07 F 3o.~ &~2fI/ A EI3 0 C. 0 0 5IJIt I IAT (." ,,r: ;

PHONE (KEY CONTACT) SOURCE ID NUMBERC--/-.-- , w ',,yrc,e',/,, 4 0 0 0 J) 6°/?-',/ , FC.

PROESSEQUIPMENT OPERATING MODE 5 CD C TV rvC, ,.-/- (/ JL

~T~*57 cit Zi-TC &illrj 6 T CICONTROL EQUIPMENT OPERATING MODE t YL. - ___

/0 0 !0 F-f/ ' :,7/'

DESCRIBE EMISSION POINT 8 O o ) 05 jLkEL.. D~ 72 C~ AWit r/4 I 2 c ________C)O O C,

1 i. .c I- _ -" 10 -

HEIGHT ABOVE GROUND LEVEL HEIGHT RELATIVE TO OBSERVER 0

J2! (Start Z). 1 End ~ C) 0 0 _ _ _ _ _

DISTANCE FROM OBSERVER DIRECTION FROM OBSERVER 12 C ) C)s ta / Z, ' r _ E nd S tart d E1d 0 0

DESCRIBE EMISSIONS -- 14 r' /) iTT" 0Start End _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

EMISSION COLOR IF WATER DROPLET PLUME 15 0 o 0 ("Stan fVC A L End V" Attached 0 - Detached []POINT IN THE PLUME AT WHICH OPACITY WAS DETERMINED 16 G 0 0 (Stant S',C 'C 571/3C'- End V'" 17 O oDESCRIBE PLUMEBACKGROUND C L F- & L 18 0 ) CStart End ~'- _ _

BACKGROUND COLOR SKY CONDITIONS 19 G ( 0 (Stanrti3,,'cLI6f)yEnd 7Start C/fl7Wi&) End - ~ 20 -

WIND SPEED WIND DIRECTION C)

Start 3 k End Startn~ End 21 f( _______

AMBIENT TEMP WET BULB TEMP RH. percent 22 C)

Start(C. End .. 51o

Stack SOURCE LAYOUT SKETCH Draw North Arrow 2

with 24Plume ____ _____-,l

Sun + 25 C, 0 /-/ fn:, ,,,./2:./'Wind I

/A-

5 L3 Sr-4L 6 At r

,o 0 () 0 o i

OBSERVER'S NAME (PRINT. ,

Observers Position ,,S /. ,S Z2,-OBERVER'S SIGNATURE DATE

Sun-- - -2- '2 4_ _-~ ....- " ,- - ',GANIZATION '7L-2 -$77/

I ~ ~ u Loc.ti. me6~,9pE1LE 6L ~ 7~-~I A.ODTIONAL INFORMATION CERTIFIED BY DATE

iv 'A1 ~r ./t- ~

A/C ~.- ~. A~t~ C/ C~mNTI ED E FORM NUMBER f~K), r. 7, e"3

33

7' 2 LAIEIOA CA " EPrrOQMINZ; ANA. ' -CFSAPE ,

L063116- • . i " 29

17SA'VPLE ZOLLECIC INPA'-N CO- I' ~* L E IC

CO ,L E F. IF

I GAL 4' . I 3%;T S

'.Il[o. CLLL VSK'A . RIE. U C .*l .. ' T r $*210E t.A SSA-. -A4F ING -E. m. F: L L,

: r .. c O x e r -0 RE Sr_ A I L. AFI AIS P t O W (6N Ar(F22AI- T C" FTL 7

tu5 Org-- ,1 A Ri BORON.

A- "_ I, _ 9_ _ ON D , 01020

'::.' . . .- CHLC.RIDE 00 40 ) /7A.. .. , j "

. ...__ __ - - IK"it. *.* "3 . 4 ,C O tt085,'t*j & L- ,{" TC*... G u -- _ __ _ _ _ _ ___•_ _ _I LA r .qIE I r.:

' G is

AMMON0IA a. N 0061,' jEI 4,4, Residue 00S0,

N: 7RATE a. N a R - H. du 009Cd Red.,ct Method 0 6 2 k! AN C.' NI S;I , St 010"5 UColt-0505

ITTE .. N 0N i '

,47AL KJELDAH LT F 0.

_ -__ _ _ _ _ _ I I..-I...U - . : __. _ __. ,, _, __3

A, A Ts6

FC, FlN!1 41 1011', 1 %. flA"

•i"; F - •

A\ dUM eto 0(' , PCSA-, S I l{ ,O0 'olth 00

F; E S____ E Ro , VATIO4 CRC1Ar

!E L' ;..h

/ - ci . . t

TA ] L L AU F TN A Y!,

S' 4 3. 14 ,C F A NALYSI


BASE 01,TE RUN NUMBER

BUILOING NUMBER SOURCE NUMBER

COC4 k _T1. PARTICULATES

ITEM FINAL WEIGHT INITIAL WEIGHT WEIGHT PARTICLESIT M(gnr) (got) (m

FILTER NUMBER

ACETONE WASHINGS (Probe, Front

He It Filter)I(€ 76/5 , -// 3

BACK HALF (if needed)

!-tul Weightt of Particulates Collected

If. WATER

ITEM FINAL WEIGHT INITIAL WEIGHT WEIGHT WATER

((g-) (9m)

IMPINGER I (H20)

IM IG R2 (H-f20)LI

IMPINGER 3 (Dr )

IMIGR4 (SII ,,l 07t . 72- 'o '72

Totl Weight of Watef Collected

GASES (Dry)

ITEM ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS AVERAGEVO2 3 4

VOL 02 i9_ _ _ / 1/_ _ _

VOL CO

VOL % N 2

Vol %N 2 (100%-%CO2 . %02 . % CO)

AMD FE 651 REPLACES OEHL 20, MAY 78, WHICH IS OBSOLETE.

35

0 c

0 F-

0 .4

IL

LI -L

0n -CI

w 0

0 v~~ 0El w

LI _

-LU 0

L:

7- 1,- 4'K 4 0 - - -a.--

CL 9

w I-

SW > r -4

CLix o.

'r4

(N-I'-2 -- -

II

0 c .

K w

cl 4

'tZ aj. P

~ '-'36

0 m w c W0 a.

-j 3z V.V

( : z L~~ki 0 w,

x o < z It <:

co m LD< 0 0 14 . Iw T: i 0 06 : ~ 'x IL 0. 0 Z u 0 0

ND 0

I U

I.- 0 " 4,

Mr k-. . .4

0 '4

W-

ri >i

w '4C'

aV7

m 'A 4r;4 o -K

0 IX -,-it w E

- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ k C3j.P ~ I - - - - ~ ~ - --- 2a:w

37

PINN'?E

BAP Fp~l:

7, C

4;. Po LII,

a, 7

T'r-

38

VISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION FORM No. eu N 2...

CrAANY NAME OBSERVATION DATE START TIME END TIME9j)/ A~r /)C :> 1> .P3-__ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ , 2.LL-L- II )L/STREET ADORLS SEC-

0 15 30 45 COMMENTSMIN

1 0 C 0 ) 300 i- C 1+0f, 14CI ' TATE ~ZIP 2 Q C) LL

PHONE (KEY CONTACT) SOURCE ID NUMBER Q 0 Q 1 C.

CLJ~6,Lc4 D _'/ ~S -5I -1 ~.ROCESS EQPMEN OPERATING MODE , ,5 55 PLus 1 a- oN ?I ..

- TO.o oi E' 6- O -,,i ,D 7 - S J;~ ~ rc.

DESCRIBE EMISSION POINT 8 6 0.57{( ,- om '3,*,'C/c &&'/,,,,~f/ 9 0 0 D0

HEIGHT ABOVE GROUND LEVEL HEIGHT RELATIVE TO OBSERVERstll 2-S'' End 7 0 !

DISTANCE FROM OBSERVER DIRECTION FROM OBSERVER 12( Q i

Star / 0 End start N V' End 13 0 C

DESCRIBE EMISSIONS /'/' cp'.L V/LJIT(r- - f'/ C,

EMISSION COLOR IIF WATER DROPLET PLUME 15-,1 &tr li-, .,,A I"'.,A d,3L( I Q 0 ,

Start End V I Attached 0 0 jfl. Delached 0 -

POINT IN THE PLUME AT WHICH OPACITY WAS DETERMINED 1 . 0 0

Start .- 1 7'F,o,2I) 1r nd 17 0 C) 0 O )

DESCRIBE PLUME BACKGROUND Is Ai',9 0 1

Start_1c fCFS End fL0 0 o ________

BACKGROUND COLOR SKY CONDITIONS 19 o0 0

start .00 End Star IEd 20WIND SPEED WIND DIRECTION --.- _"__

Stan. - End I,' Start / End '7 2 0 210

AMBIENT TEMP LZ WET BULB TEMP H. percent 22 0 o I

Start 2 c- End

Stack SOURCE LAYOUT SKETCH Draw North Arow 2

w th cr -i.C: 24 Q ( 9 ( r)~ )CVt(,,

Sun+ 2 . 0 I/kJA,6.- /+,.,,PV ')Wind 2 5 D 0 0c

44 Ot" mission Point 27 ' 0 l/ S

28fhC 0 _________

29 5 /jv7t7/

30 0 0 0 5, ,OBSERVER'S NAME (PRINT)

Observer's Position jE:r6 ,~ %~1~~jQ,~OBSERVER'S SIGNATURE DATES1, ," a -

Sun Location Line 41cAeO1 7~ f-rv

A*DTOA INFORMATION CEIRnIFIED BY DATE

FL . VO 2 F'F'L. OIL_ 7"e tA C ,7.LL-,(1) I/ ,

i4 aV4 CNTINUE" ON VEO FORM NUMBER IIII39

2LABORATOPY PERFOQMING ANAL-t SAPEN

,Eq063 112/

r.,mQE. COLLECTICN INrORMA-10O, c

7. S. TL DLSCR,- rICN - ~ 2 _ _ _ _ _ _

b. SITE 16,*~~.,O & F-01PATE A7 C~l.3-

00 -..i 0

11. COLLECTION :)ATE/; f-IO:) A 1, ~ f ~ . LT- TI _____

3. SAMPLING 7EC-QI0E

5. RE ASONI FOR, S A4F_ $5 S MISSIOIN

N-DES*

________________ _;-',ALI__ REU-'-SE AJ5 FESLJLTS tIPRESE R ATI ,i uN.6OU P A P'QESER,A7IZJl GrDLP F NCRj

0; A -E T F CAL IC L - Tt . Il 4. Ra- rp ,AE LR 7 *. .7-

D-a1 d g~ AFISENIC i EORON 0 10.1 2

C A. ROrgrN as ~ C HA RINI ' 01020

A~)I . 11 .~~ 2- CHLORIDEr 00940

PR SER\ ATICN /,QOUF 8 I

-AF AMET LR TO' MGl = . 31- f~.I34 COLOR 0008c,

OIL & GREASIE ... ,be TS

PAAMLr. 1 1 L M GOL IRON, '" I ' :::l~l5 IE (

AkMONIA as N 00t I., L LAD LJIU4- 01051 Residue. 00500

NMTRA TE 0. N RoolduCd Red,.,c. Method 006 2 N MA N A NL5E ('1056 01055 1'oleflJ. 00505

NITRITE a.a N 00615 MERCURY 71S9C, 71000 Sp-cI(ic 00095IC -- , c LW. e,OTAL KIELDAMI 5ro SULFA TE 094

NtT, ROGEN e. N 00t2~ k N ICK E I ~ , .so, 00__4 1 ______

PHOSPHORUS 70( F IEFN*IIl. . 130 S'R FACTANTS1O,!:jrP04. &It_ P 0: _ MH55AS .,LAS e

P"i PH R S 06t. \:I VL ulc,'. *10. T1R D1\0

________ ~~~~ ~ TRBD 7N_ 00__ ___ . _ __ 76_ ___

a_ _ _ p ~ S 0' T . R L~~02-

'IINJ.

0 Y A 7 ' .I zL V , P O T A S I-'. I I e I

AN:, RFLETN reLSI 7~P~~L~N, 0 1. "z

AFS Forv 315 tD; .8 toIA8AM~62 MA88 eHCIOS~l IO~OA EWE ~AYIS, IU r,( , 40


BASE DATE RUN NUMBER

BUILDING NUMBER SOURCE NUMBER

Cl!5S-4iea Wa) 54- MtO~ vcdeif C479 -PARTICULATES

ITEM FINAL WEIGHT INITIAL WEIGHT WEIGHT PARTICLES(a-) (am) (0-m)

FILTER NUMBER 142-7s .14/1ACETONE WASHINGS (Probe, FrontHiall Filter) /03,/077 102-+V 3 30:-4BACK HALF (it needed)

Total Weight of Particulates Collected

/I. WATER

ITEM FINAL WEIGHT INITIAL WEIGHT WEIGHT WATER(ian) (an) (gi)

IMPINGER 1 (1120) q.,

IMPINGER 2 (H20) 2 .~

IMPINGER 3 (Dry)0.

IMPINGER 4 (Silic Gel) 2;_0__________Total Weight of Water Collected 5o '

III. GASES (Dry)

ITEM ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS AVERAGEI 2 3 4

VOL COZ 7L 4_ _ _

VOL 02__ _ _ _ _ _5 5

VOL % CO

VOL % NZ

Vol% N2 (100%. C0 2 . %02. CO)

AMD 84 651 REPLACES OEHL 20, MAY 7S, WHICH IS OBSOLETE.

41

RUN NUMBER xo ~P ~4j

METER VOL -E

DELTH'E H c;

MER HOl: E

ML. WTER

V t:T P :T

wlI)., W

tT AWE. -

-: 7 %h !

242

0C 0 mw

01

0i 0 W

A4 -

iw x 0w

0 LL 0L a.M

luJ

Vrr4-)~

WI.

----------------------------------------------

I- . I

de,- \r SN

II ~ '1\r

~I

x 0 -K> 0

44

tw'

Z f

z 0

< z mm M-

w w.1- m jJ N

-K 0 0 N

4 a: 00 - -

IL zl

IL

VI

.4,.

wU,:

CL.

.4

I.--

4-. .

r, 'A

ul~ --t_

IL)43

I0r

m 0 la L

J U) 1

44

VISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION FORM No. Zj gb 3COMPANY NAMEI OBSERVATION DATE START TIME ENID TIME

_____________________ 13s-' (jLV) / /10STREET ADDRESS SEC

MN 0 15 30 45 COMMENTS

1 300 t& 3O~C7)C'f

CITY STATE IZIP 2S SR kN y 13

PHONE (KEY CONTACT) SOURCt 10 NUMBER7-

C1) 5- , f TEC/ Cff7R Ye 1, 545- .9ooIPROCESS EUIPMENTA OPERATING MODE -5 C)CONTOEOINE4 OPERATING MODE0

DECRIBE EMISSION POINT 8 6) 0 0

5rr,-ftq y,4e()f2vv 2),~g 10o o _______

HEIGHT ABOVE CiRCUNDI LEVEL HEIGHT RELATIVE TO OBSERVER- _ ___ -____________

-2 i ( LZSatZ '? IEnd I 1 _ Q I _ _ _

DISTANCE FROM OBSERVER DIRECTION FROM OBSERVER 12 ~____________S"- /0 End VStart - ~ End V __3__ _ _

DESCRIBE EMISSIONS

EMISSION COLOR IF WATER DROPLET PLUME 15 0 0 ~ '

Srart s- End A---aed 0Deahd0 1POINT IN THE PLUME AT WHICH OPACITY WAS DETERMINED16Q Q ___________

Stan 0t3V)~aorn 5 rWCk.End L.-' 17 Q 0 ___________

DESCRIBE PLUME BACKGROUND 1

BAKRUDCOLOR -- SKY CONDITIONS -19 7 00 ___________

Start End L.X 5 1 ~~~c End 20 C) C ) ___________

Wv.,. SPCtFC) WIND DIRECTION

Start 5', End Stan Vf-~5 rFEnd 21 Q CAMBIENT TEMP End iBUTEMP RH~ percen

23 0 0_____Slack SOURCE LAYOUT SKETCH Draw North Anew 2

Sun + 13 L& 25 0 0C 0 FC. r<W'A. 26r?- -kc

X~ mission Poin 21 C) I0C 0 6) Vpy1 ,Sr28 C ~ c 'Siir~"

V' I-orN LO29 19f0 ~ p' Sini

1430

Sun Location Line kfAMOTKONAL INFORMATION 1ETFF YDT

C09PA17Yf -00t//f,)41 1CONTIItFn ON VFO FCA NIIL14C

2. LABORtATORY PERFORMING ANAL" 4 OESO SMLEN

063118 ~ ~

SAMPLE COLLECTICN INPOR"AT IONTE

. ITE DIESCRIPTION': 1;;* -~ , -\ j - e Yx .o

It. COLLECTION DATE ; RIOD t2, r-cL ', .'I -Es. v C 7' E'- 0-517ITE ANAL vSL S

13. SAMPLING 7E -- NII4

15. RE ASO-4 FDR 5 AP - S SUBMISSIONt

NPOES

4NA 5 ES RQL tS7 ED ANqD ESULTS Lit 3

PRESERPA IIC,,N .OuPA ____ PFSEPATION C.DUP~ F___0__ V I,

PARAMETRTTOA GC/L IVAI;A',fS *1* -A AETF OTA

Cl-rn:,.a Ox~vgen Oi1f ARSENIC (.LiBR N 12

P_ _ A _ _ I_ _ -!,I I _ _ _ _ _ _0ARSOON s

____ ________ __CILORIDE 0094-0PRESERVATION____GROUP!1. 30 Q 'I1('0I14 COLOR 00080 U1

.AP-E E A TCA -G L A_____

OIL & 6R Ai7E 0c.'. I. W Wil FLUORIDEi 00951

FR E OD'-IR klIho' fP~e.4R -,.e il 0 '

PRL$ERVA7I' CRDUP 'C IRON~i N 005 30V

r A RA " E! TOwA 0G1- Filt (~

AAOOA *a N 00t LAI' ko4c 01051 R.eI&.* 00500

IV!TREA TEa.a N R.41de 0.0Cd Rod~,ct. M.Ihod 0062r A MA N0.A NES 1 01056 frIOSS Volatile000

NITRITE an N 00615 * MERCL:R% 71ftv' 7190 sp-Cific ODD95 m.

OT7AL KIELDAN SVF ' 04N17POGEIV as N 0062; NICKEL I. ic 010 fC1017 SO, 0 04

PHOSPHuRUJS 75-SEI ENI1II.? 4 0114', SURACTNT

Ortho P04 p9 P __ I_____ MPAS sLAS ________

PHOSPHORUS (,06t SILVER 1l( 1 I-7 TI' B; DIT N 0007A

P 105SEQ'.' AT-- _____________00_5_"09

CYAIE M ~1AGNLS!, %1 _______ --

PARAMETER TO T A. PAAG/LE

PHENOLS j3273(

1. OPIs.IZATIOh RE-,LrSTiNG ANALYS!S :ES±___

R EV- E VED 6

AP PCsZP

AFSC Form 3145, DEC 85 REPACES AMDFORM 2CI MAF3 WH~IS081 OSOLETE NON-POTABLE WATER ANALYSIS46

APPENDIX E

Calibration Data

47


48

NOZZLE CALIBRATION DATA FORM

Wri ght Pta te rsom

Date Dec 8') Calibrated by _C7_

Nozzle Nozzle Diametera bidentification D1 , D, D, AD, Davg

number mm (In.) m mnin.) mmin.) mm (in.)

where:

aD 1,2, three di fferent nozzles diameters, mm (iii. ); each1,2,3, diameter must be within (0.025 irm) 0.001 in.

b AD maximum difference between any two diameters, mm (in.),

AD <(0.10 mm) 0.004 in.

C avg average of DI , D and D3 .

Quality Assurance Handbook M5-2.6

49

M4ETER BOX CALIBRATION DATA AND CALCULATION FORM

(English units)

Date 12-. JLAA 68 C>eter box number ;0[0fit/jfC

Barometric pressure, Pb=____ in. HS Calibrated by ql-I5(f

Gas volume T_________

Orifice Wet test Dry gas Wet test Dvismetermanometer meter meter meter Inlet Outlet Avg Time

V,, in. H20 ft3 ft3 OrA/ 0/~F/ Km 1 .10

t~ ~ ~ -- 71b -& w -~ -X i i~l

4 0.5 5 ___5_b71 -63? 7'5, 539 13, L.0 0 . 0QIDL~1.0 5 75__ 53~ i p, %5 v 7 553_31,- 1.o0

1.5 10 __ '_ 5 38 gLI. 2cO2.01 7f 1(553 1154 -351o. ,5tv j' 155 082fL-

2.0 107 9

,

3. 10a W)17 0. '1(059 q3 5T 5. 557,5 o,1 ,08I 1O4.0 10 5q I Iq t 755-5 1,41"3 I' 1'098- 2.135

Avg /.0772.070

&HV ( + 460) 037 (t + 460) ]2

in AHY w Pb d - AH 0.1 A60)

li20 36xV()+ AH(t./+ 460) i b (td + L60 1 V

0.5 0.0368 '

1.0 0.0737 ___

1.5 0.11'0( L ai 1"'f

2.0 0.147 (17 .4I -- 3.V

3.0 0.221 97q, k.:-i e~[~ c

4.0 0.294 - : X /9/4S It'~ ~~T Sf

aIf there is only one thermometer on the dry gas meter, record the temperatureunder t d.

Quality Assurance Handbook M4-2.3A (front side)

50

0 +

-4-4-00

b..44

j 0

"4 $4 00Cl 1 0 Lfl

.00

0

Q4j 4-4

$-4 0 -

00 00 co4) .I'4 4) 00~U i a

44 PC. -0 v1- *-4 a4) G41 > o4- -4 1:4 r .*443 0 K)4 04-) 4

WO - -.0. 9)O-4 4 0S-4. . ca td 0Aj4 C 0 , c (3 vi (S to~ 4

~4) 00 ( ) co

41~~C COEn O 14

4) 4-j 'a o 0.4.olm)~ 4)

M- 144 C4 u041

10 di


52

Distribution List

Copies

HQ AFSC/SGPB 1Andrews AFB DC 20334-5000

HQ USAF/SGPA 1Boiling AFB DC 20332-6188

HQ SAC/SGPB 1Offutt AFB NE 68113-5001

USAF Regional Medical Center Wiesbaden/SGB 1APO New York 09220-5300

OL AD, AFOEHL 1APO San Francisco 96274-5000

USAFSAM/TSK 1Brooks AFB TX 78235-5301

USAFSAM/EDH 1Brooks AFB TX 78235-5301

Defense Technical Information Center(DTIC) 2Cameron StationAlexandria VA 22319

HSD/XAE 1Brooks AFB TX 78235-5000

HQ USAF/LEEV 1Bolling AFB DC 20330-5000

HQ AFESC/RDV 1Tyndall AFB FL 32403-6001

HQ SAIC/DE 1Offutt AFB NE 68113-5001

USAF Hospital Griffiss/SGPB 5Griffiss AFB NY 13441-5300

53SUS GO\,ERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1989-661-041 00025

1 unclassified naa8 3qa*9e o;/ hl4 schematic of orsat apparatus 6 5 schematic of particulate...

Documents