1 vehicle emissions testing program legislative audit bureau may 2002
TRANSCRIPT
1
Vehicle Emissions Testing Program
Legislative Audit Bureau
May 2002
2
Overview
The federal Clean Air Act defines the program
The program seeks to reduce ozone pollution
In 2001
– 784,000 tests performed
– 12 testing stations
– 7 southeastern Wisconsin counties
3
Program Structure
FY 2000-01 costs of $11.2 million DNR administrative costs of $68,000 GPR DOT administers contract with a testing firm
– DOT’s administrative costs of $565,300 are from the Transportation Fund
– Contract payments were $10.5 million ($7.7 million from the Transportation Fund and $2.8 million in federal funds) in FY 2000-01
4
Air Quality Measurements
Air quality in southeastern Wisconsin has improved
There have been fewer violations of federal air quality standards
5
Air Quality Improvement
14
9
20
12
910
21
29
8
3
17
2 2
4
8
3 32
4
0
2
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
Days per Year in Which Southeastern Wisconsin Ozone Levels Exceeded the Federal Standard
6
Wisconsin’s Testing Program
Federal model allows some discretion Wisconsin’s program is generally more
stringent– more model years tested– more stringent testing technique
Wisconsin is less stringent on some parameters– biennial rather than annual testing
7
Failure Rates Have Increased
New vehicles rarely fail the test Testing for nitrogen oxide, begun in May 2001,
has increased failure rates – Rates increased from less than 10% in early 2001 to
more than 18% in November 2001 Vehicle repair costs have increased
– Costs ranged from $117 to $144 in January through April, then ranged from $142 to $180 during remainder of the year
8
The Testing Contract
DOT manages the contract with Envirotest Systems Corporation
Envirotest owns and operates the vehicle emissions testing stations
Current contract period is from November 1995 through November 2002
Annual payment was $10.6 million in CY 2001
9
Contract Management Concerns
Testing volumes have been 14 to 18 percent lower than anticipated
Waiting time standards were often exceeded A testing lane at one station was frequently closed Public information requirements were not fully
met Customer complaint procedure not clearly posted
at all stations
10
Future Considerations
Some program changes are at the state’s discretion– exempt 4 newest model years– increase emissions thresholds
Program changes constrained by federal law– decrease the cost waiver limit– exempt individual counties from the program– remove reformulated gasoline requirement
11
Future Considerations
Attainment/maintenance status expected in 2002 for six counties
Eight-hour ozone standard has a threshold of 85 parts per billion
12 counties are potentially nonattainment areas under the eight-hour standard – Door, Jefferson, Kewaunee, Manitowoc, Rock;
Kenosha, Milwaukee, Ozaukee, Racine, Sheboygan, Washington, and Waukesha
12
Vehicle Emissions Testing Program
Legislative Audit Bureau
May 2002