1 wasl mathematics: 2004-2008 grade 7. 2 wasl math: where are we now? questions to answer: how are...
TRANSCRIPT
1
WASL Mathematics: 2004-2008WASL Mathematics: 2004-2008
Grade 7Grade 7
Heatherwood Middle
2
WASL Math: Where are we now?WASL Math: Where are we now?
Questions to answer:Questions to answer:
• How are we doing?How are we doing?
• Compared to district & state?Compared to district & state?
• Compared to previous years?Compared to previous years?
3
Levels of Analyzing Our DataLevels of Analyzing Our Data
Broad findingsBroad findings
Specific findingsSpecific findings
Percent Meeting the Standard
• Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
• Performance Levels
• Strand Scores
4
Grade 7 WASL: Grade 7 WASL: Mathematics PerformanceMathematics Performance
Percent Meeting Math Standard
0
20
40
60
80
100
% M
eeti
ng
Sta
nd
ard
HeatherwoodMiddle
59 66 60 70 69
2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
5
Grade 7 WASL: Grade 7 WASL: Mathematics PerformanceMathematics Performance
Percent Meeting Math Standard School, District, & State
0
20
40
60
80
100
% M
eeti
ng
Sta
nd
ard
2003-04 59 48 37
2004-05 66 54 46
2005-06 60 49 51
2006-07 70 58 55
2007-08 69 53 50
Heatherwood Middle District State
6
Questions about Our Math PerformanceQuestions about Our Math Performance
• What do these comparisons seem to tell What do these comparisons seem to tell us?us?
– Celebrations:Celebrations:
– Challenges:Challenges:
• What do these comparisons What do these comparisons notnot tell us? tell us?
• What What elseelse do we need to know? do we need to know?Starting in spring 2010, students will be assessed on Starting in spring 2010, students will be assessed on the new 2008 standards.the new 2008 standards.
7
Levels of Analyzing Our DataLevels of Analyzing Our Data
Broad findingsBroad findings
Specific findingsSpecific findings
• Percent meeting the Standard
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
• Performance Levels
• Strand Scores
8
Adequate Yearly Progress: Math Adequate Yearly Progress: Math Annual Targets for Grades 6, 7 & 8Annual Targets for Grades 6, 7 & 8
MATHAdequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Targets
17.3
38.0
58.7
79.3
100.0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
Per
cen
t M
eeti
ng
Sta
nd
ard
9
AYP SubgroupsAYP Subgroups
• In addition to the all continuously enrolled students In addition to the all continuously enrolled students category, the subgroups include: the five major category, the subgroups include: the five major racial/ethnic groups, special education, English racial/ethnic groups, special education, English Language Learners, and low income students.Language Learners, and low income students.
• The performance of a subgroup is considered if there The performance of a subgroup is considered if there is a minimum of 30 continuously enrolled students, a is a minimum of 30 continuously enrolled students, a change from 2007. change from 2007.
• The next slide reflects your AYP status based on The next slide reflects your AYP status based on continuously enrolled students.continuously enrolled students.
10
Grade 7 WASL-Mathematics: Grade 7 WASL-Mathematics: Adequate Yearly Progress GoalsAdequate Yearly Progress Goals
7th Grade Math AYP
70
.9
0 0 0
73
.2
0
80
0
36
.4
0102030405060708090
100
All
Am
eric
anIn
dian Bla
ck
His
pani
c
Whi
te
Lim
ited
Eng
lish
Asi
an
Spe
cial
Edu
catio
n
Low
Inco
me
Margin of Error
Percent meeting standard (07-08 thru 09-10 Goal=58.7)
Goal
Heatherwood Middle
11
Questions aboutQuestions aboutOur Adequate Yearly ProgressOur Adequate Yearly Progress
• What do these data seem to tell us?What do these data seem to tell us?
– Celebrations:Celebrations:
– Challenges:Challenges:
• What do these data What do these data notnot tell us? tell us?
• What What elseelse do we need to know? do we need to know?
12
Levels of Analyzing Our DataLevels of Analyzing Our Data
Broad findingsBroad findings
Specific findingsSpecific findings
• Percent Meeting theStandard
• Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
Performance Levels
• Strand Scores
13
Results by Performance LevelsResults by Performance Levels
Four Levels in MathematicsFour Levels in Mathematics
““Meets the Standard”Meets the Standard”4. Well above the standard4. Well above the standard3. Above the standard3. Above the standard
““Does Not Meet the Standard”Does Not Meet the Standard”2. Below the standard2. Below the standard1. Well below the standard1. Well below the standard
14
Picture of Ideal Trends for LevelsPicture of Ideal Trends for Levels
Percent of Students at each Level
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
Per
cent
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Decrease these levels each year
Increase these levels each year
15
Grade 7 WASL Mathematics: Grade 7 WASL Mathematics: Performance Levels TrendsPerformance Levels Trends
Percent of Students Scoring in Each Performance Level Math Grade 7
1823
34
25
16 17
28
39
19 20
37
23
15 15
3337
11
1924
45
0
20
40
60
80
100
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
Performance Level
Per
cen
t in
Lev
el 2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
Meets StandardDoes Not Meet Standard
Heatherwood Middle
16
Levels of Analyzing Our DataLevels of Analyzing Our Data
Broad findingsBroad findings
Specific findingsSpecific findings
• Percent Meeting the Standard
• Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
• Performance Levels
Strand ScoresStarting in spring 2009 Starting in spring 2009 grades 3 to 8 students will grades 3 to 8 students will have shorter math tests, have shorter math tests, without strand scores.without strand scores.
17
7th Grade WASL Mathematics Strands7th Grade WASL Mathematics Strands
• Mathematical ContentMathematical Content– Number Sense Number Sense – MeasurementMeasurement– Geometric SenseGeometric Sense– Probability/StatisticsProbability/Statistics– Algebraic SenseAlgebraic Sense
• Mathematical ProcessesMathematical Processes– Solves Problems and Reasons LogicallySolves Problems and Reasons Logically– Communicates UnderstandingCommunicates Understanding– Makes ConnectionsMakes Connections
Defensible strand score analysis tracks the difference between school and state.
18
Grade 7 WASL: Grade 7 WASL: Mathematical Content – Strand #1Mathematical Content – Strand #1
Defining what we are Defining what we are measuringmeasuring
Number SenseNumber Sense Targets NS01-05 Targets NS01-05
Understand and apply concepts and procedures Understand and apply concepts and procedures from number sense:from number sense:
• number and numerationnumber and numeration• ration and proportionration and proportion• conceptual understanding of operationsconceptual understanding of operations• computationcomputation• estimationestimation
19
Grade 7 Number Sense:Grade 7 Number Sense:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State
Number Sense
0
20
40
60
80
100
% w
ith
sim
ilar
pe
rfo
rma
nc
e
% 69.4 43.5 50.9
Heatherwood Middle District State
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc
en
tSchool 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001Difference Between School and State Percents
1014
1
1319
-50
-25
0
25
50
2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
Pe
rce
nt
Po
int
Dif
fere
nc
e
20
Grade 7 WASL: Grade 7 WASL: Mathematical Content – Strand #2Mathematical Content – Strand #2
Defining what we are measuringDefining what we are measuring
MeasurementMeasurementTargets ME01-04Targets ME01-04
Understand and apply concepts and Understand and apply concepts and proceduresprocedures
from measurement:from measurement:• attributes and dimensionsattributes and dimensions• units and systemsunits and systems• proceduresprocedures• estimated measurementsestimated measurements
21
Grade 7 Measurement:Grade 7 Measurement:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State
Measurement
0
20
40
60
80
100
% w
ith
sim
ilar
per
form
ance
% 69.7 58.4 53.2
Heatherwood Middle District State
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc
en
tSchool 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001Difference Between School and State Percents
1318
13 1017
-50
-25
0
25
50
2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
Per
cen
t P
oin
t D
iffe
ren
ce
22
Grade 7 WASL: Grade 7 WASL: Mathematical Content – Strand #3Mathematical Content – Strand #3
Defining what we are Defining what we are measuringmeasuringGeometric SenseGeometric Sense
Targets GS01-02Targets GS01-02
Understand and apply concepts and proceduresUnderstand and apply concepts and procedures
from geometric sense:from geometric sense:• properties and relationshipsproperties and relationships• location and transformationslocation and transformations
23
Grade 7 Geometric Sense:Grade 7 Geometric Sense:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State
Difference Between School and State Percents
0
115
16 14
-50
-25
0
25
50
2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
Per
cen
t P
oin
t D
iffe
ren
ce 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc
en
tSchool 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001Geometric Sense
0
20
40
60
80
100
% w
ith
sim
ilar
per
form
ance
% 78.6 72.1 65.1
Heatherwood Middle District State
24
Grade 7 WASL:Grade 7 WASL:Mathematical Content – Strand #4Mathematical Content – Strand #4
Defining what we are Defining what we are measuringmeasuring
Probability and StatisticsProbability and StatisticsTargets PS01-03Targets PS01-03
Understand and apply concepts and proceduresUnderstand and apply concepts and procedures
from probability and statistics:from probability and statistics:• probabilityprobability• data collection and central tendenciesdata collection and central tendencies• data representation and interpretationdata representation and interpretation
25
Grade 7 Probability & Statistics:Grade 7 Probability & Statistics:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State
Difference Between School and State Percents
10 136 7
18
-50
-25
0
25
50
2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
Per
cen
t P
oin
t D
iffe
ren
ce 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc
en
tSchool 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001Probability & Statistics
0
20
40
60
80
100
% w
ith
sim
ilar
per
form
ance
% 74.9 61.9 56.8
Heatherwood Middle District State
26
Grade 7 WASL: Grade 7 WASL: Mathematical Content – Strand #5Mathematical Content – Strand #5
Defining what we are Defining what we are measuringmeasuring
Algebraic SenseAlgebraic SenseTargets AS01-03Targets AS01-03
Understand and apply concepts and procedures Understand and apply concepts and procedures
from algebraic sense:from algebraic sense:• patterns and functionspatterns and functions• symbols and notationssymbols and notations• evaluating and solvingevaluating and solving
27
Grade 7 Algebraic Sense:Grade 7 Algebraic Sense:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State
Difference Between School and State Percents
8 8
-2
11 10
-50
-25
0
25
50
2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
Per
cen
t P
oin
t D
iffe
ren
ce 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc
en
tSchool 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001Algebraic Sense
0
20
40
60
80
100
% w
ith
sim
ilar
per
form
ance
% 61.3 48.6 51.8
Heatherwood Middle District State
28
Grade 7 WASL: Grade 7 WASL: Mathematical Process – Strand #6Mathematical Process – Strand #6
Defining what we are Defining what we are measuringmeasuring
Solves Problems and Reasons Solves Problems and Reasons LogicallyLogically
Targets SR01-05Targets SR01-05
Uses mathematics to define and solve problems Uses mathematics to define and solve problems
and reason logically:and reason logically:• define problemsdefine problems• construct solutionsconstruct solutions• analyze informationanalyze information• concludeconclude• construct solutions and justifyconstruct solutions and justify
29
Grade 7 Solves Problems/Reasons Logically:Grade 7 Solves Problems/Reasons Logically:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State
Difference Between School and State Percents
1612 10 11
16
-50
-25
0
25
50
2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
Per
cen
t P
oin
t D
iffe
ren
ce 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc
en
tSchool 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001Solves Problems & Reasons Logically
0
20
40
60
80
100
% w
ith
sim
ilar
per
form
ance
% 68.3 55.5 52
Heatherwood Middle District State
30
Grade 7 WASL: Grade 7 WASL: Mathematical Process – Strand #7Mathematical Process – Strand #7
Defining what we are measuringDefining what we are measuring
Communicates UnderstandingCommunicates UnderstandingTargets CU01-02Targets CU01-02
Communicate knowledge and understanding in Communicate knowledge and understanding in bothboth
everyday and mathematical language:everyday and mathematical language:• gather informationgather information• organize, represent, and share organize, represent, and share
informationinformation
31
Grade 7 Communicates Understanding:Grade 7 Communicates Understanding:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State
Difference Between School and State Percents
15 128
12
24
-50
-25
0
25
50
2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
Per
cen
t P
oin
t D
iffe
ren
ce 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc
en
tSchool 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001Communicates Understanding
0
20
40
60
80
100
% w
ith
sim
ilar
per
form
ance
% 72.3 54.5 48.3
Heatherwood Middle District State
32
Grade 7 WASL:Grade 7 WASL:Mathematical Process – Strand #8Mathematical Process – Strand #8
Defining what we are measuringDefining what we are measuring
Makes ConnectionsMakes ConnectionsTargets MC01Targets MC01
Understand how mathematical ideas connectUnderstand how mathematical ideas connectwithin mathematics, to other subject areas, within mathematics, to other subject areas, and to real-life situations:and to real-life situations:
• connect within mathematicsconnect within mathematics
33
Grade 7 Makes Connections:Grade 7 Makes Connections:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State
Difference Between School and State Percents
4
24
3
15 15
-50
-25
0
25
50
2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
Per
cen
t P
oin
t D
iffe
ren
ce 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc
en
tSchool 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001Make Connections
0
20
40
60
80
100
% w
ith
sim
ilar
per
form
ance
% 68.6 58.0 53.4
Heatherwood Middle District State
34
Questions about Grade 7 Questions about Grade 7 Mathematics Strand Data and TrendsMathematics Strand Data and Trends
• What do these strand data seem to tell What do these strand data seem to tell us?us?– Celebrations:Celebrations:
– Challenges:Challenges:
• What do these trends What do these trends notnot tell us? tell us?
• What What elseelse do we need to know? do we need to know?
35
Our WASL Mathematics StrengthsOur WASL Mathematics Strengths
• List areas where students were proficient.List areas where students were proficient.
• How about the subgroups?How about the subgroups?
• What did we do What did we do to contributeto contribute to their to their successes?successes?
• What do we need to continue to do to ensure What do we need to continue to do to ensure success with our students in the future?success with our students in the future?
• Can we use these strategies to improve areas Can we use these strategies to improve areas where our students are not proficient?where our students are not proficient?
36
Our WASL Mathematics TargetsOur WASL Mathematics Targets
• List challenges.List challenges.
• What do we need What do we need to do differentlyto do differently to improve to improve student performance in these areas? student performance in these areas?
• What other data do we need to consider?What other data do we need to consider?
• What can we learn from our successes?What can we learn from our successes?