1 www. f allon r esearch.com methods telephone interviews performed by specially-trained opinion...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: 1 www. F allon R esearch.com Methods Telephone Interviews Performed by Specially-trained Opinion Research Interviewers Conducted with 800 Randomly-selected](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022072014/56649e885503460f94b8c7d8/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1www.FallonResearch.com
MethodsMethods
Telephone Interviews Performed by Specially-trained Opinion Research Interviewers
Conducted with 800 Randomly-selected General Election Voters within the State of Ohio, using a Combination of Valid Residential and Cellular
Telephone Listings
+/- 3.46% Overall Estimated Margin of Error, with a Confidence Interval of 6.92% Within Which the Results Could Vary
April 7 – April 10, 2014
Data was Stratified so that the Differences in Vital Characteristics, such as Age, Race, Gender and Geography are Represented in Proportion to Their
Percentages of the Electorate
Due to rounding, not all results add up to 100%, and the data is presented in a different order than the questions were asked
![Page 2: 1 www. F allon R esearch.com Methods Telephone Interviews Performed by Specially-trained Opinion Research Interviewers Conducted with 800 Randomly-selected](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022072014/56649e885503460f94b8c7d8/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2www.FallonResearch.com
The proposal to increase the cigarette tax, and use part of the funds for smoking prevention, has the support of nearly two-thirds of Ohio voters
surveyed and was well-received across the spectrum of partisanship
Do you favor or oppose Increasing the state cigarette tax by $1 dollar per pack, with part of the revenue dedicated to tobacco prevention, including programs to prevent kids
from smoking and help adults who want to quit?
Strongly favor49%
Strongly oppose24%
Somewhat oppose11%
Somewhat favor14%
Unsure2%
63% Total Favor63% Total Favor
61
36
65
34
64
33
0102030405060708090
100
Republicans Democrats Unaffiliated
Total favor Total oppose
OVERALL BY PARTY*
* Differences were not statistically significant
![Page 3: 1 www. F allon R esearch.com Methods Telephone Interviews Performed by Specially-trained Opinion Research Interviewers Conducted with 800 Randomly-selected](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022072014/56649e885503460f94b8c7d8/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3www.FallonResearch.com
The idea of establishing comparable rates of taxation for other types of tobacco products was highly popular, and it even garnered substantial support
among voters who oppose increasing the cigarette tax
As you may or may not know, Ohio currently taxes cigars, smokeless tobacco products such as chewing tobacco, and electronic cigarettes, at a lower rate than cigarettes. Regardless of how you feel about
increasing the cigarette tax, do you favor or oppose taxing these other types of tobacco products at the same rate as cigarettes?
67% Total Favor67% Total Favor
Strongly favor50%
Strongly oppose20%
Somewhat oppose9%
Somewhat favor17%
Unsure4%
81
16
43
55
0102030405060708090
100
Favor increasing cigarette tax Oppose increasing cigarette tax
Total favor Total oppose
OVERALL BY TAX PREFERENCES
![Page 4: 1 www. F allon R esearch.com Methods Telephone Interviews Performed by Specially-trained Opinion Research Interviewers Conducted with 800 Randomly-selected](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022072014/56649e885503460f94b8c7d8/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4www.FallonResearch.com
There is exceptionally high support for restoring tobacco prevention programs, which, very tellingly, received the greatest backing from those who have
firsthand experience to understand the effects of smoking
As you may or may not know, Ohio receives about $825 million dollars in revenue from tobacco taxes each year. Currently, none of this money is used to fund a tobacco prevention program to prevent kids
from smoking and help adults who want to quit. Would you favor or oppose dedicating $50 million dollars of the state’s tobacco tax revenue to tobacco prevention programs, which would restore funding cuts
made to the program in recent years?
69% Total Favor69% Total Favor
OVERALL
Strongly favor48%
Strongly oppose17%
Somewhat oppose10%
Somewhat favor21%
Unsure4%
67
28
76
23
71
24
0102030405060708090
100
Non-smokers Regular smokers Former smokers
Total favor Total oppose
BY SMOKING HABITS