10. epidemiology of oral diseases - ddental caries2

74
1.PREVENTIVE AND COMMUNITY DENTISTRY I EPIDEMIOLOGY OF ORAL DISEASES: DENTAL CARIES Dr. Caroline Piske de A. Mohamed

Upload: carolinepiske

Post on 15-Nov-2015

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

We discuss the epidemiology of oral diseases in a clear explanation.

TRANSCRIPT

  • 1.PREVENTIVE AND COMMUNITY DENTISTRY I

    EPIDEMIOLOGY OF ORAL DISEASES:

    DENTAL CARIES

    Dr. Caroline Piske de A. Mohamed

  • OBJECTIVES

    Students should be able to explain and discuss:

    1. Epidemiology of dental caries

    2. How do you measure dental caries?

    3. Epidemiology of dental caries A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE

    4. Dental caries and disparities

    5. Factors affecting the epidemiology of dental caries

    6. RISK FACTORS AND INDICATORS

    7. Nutrition and caries

    8. DIET AND CARIES

    9. Environmental factors that may affect caries

  • HOW DO YOU MEASURE DENTAL CARIES?

    Dental caries is an universal disease affecting all

    geographic regions, races, both the sexes

    and all ages groups.

    The prevalence of dental caries is generally

    estimated at the ages of 5, 12, 15, 35 to 44 and

    65 to 74 years for global monitoring of

    trends and international comparisons.

    The prevalence is expressed in terms of point

    prevalence ( percentage of population affected

    at any given point of time) as well as DMFT

    index ( number of decayed, missing and filled

    teeth in an individual and in a population)

  • MEASURING DENTAL CARIES

    WHO oral health surveys manual means of DMF-

    T Index:

    Very low = 0.0 1.0

    Low = 1.2 2.6

    Medium = 2.7 4.4

    High = 4.4 6.5

    Very high = 6.5 or more

  • The levels of dental caries are high

    in many countries and populations,

    was it the same in ancient times?

  • EPIDEMIOLOGY OF DENTAL CARIES

    A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE

    Dental caries was very uncommon amongst

    fossil hominids into the Paleolithic and

    Mesolithic era. The incidence of caries was less

    than 1%.

    From the Australopithecines (over a million years

    ago) to the Neolithic (since 10,000 years ago),

    carious lesions have been found in almost

    every population studied.

  • FROM HUNTERS TO CROPERS

    MORE CARIES....

    Several studies have shown an increase in

    caries rate associated with the change from a

    hunter-gatherer diet with meat and low

    carbohydrate to a diet heavy with starch-

    rich cereal.

    With maize agriculture, the dominant pattern

    was root surface caries or lesions at the

    cemento-enamel junction initiated in

    adulthood.

    Where sugars have been introduced into the

    diet, fissure and proximal surface cavities,

    particularly in children, became dominant.

  • ANCIENT EGYPT

    What do Egyptian dental patterns reveal

    about their lives and how to they compare

    to living populations today?

    Dental caries were far less frequently seen

    amongst ancient Egyptians and Nubians than in

    today's populations. Two reasons are cited.

    First, rapid wear literally wore away the

    sites of pit and fissure cavities. Second, was

    the lack of refined carbohydrates in their

    diet.

  • Ancient Egyptians and Nubians rarely had the

    dental crowding and abnormal molar

    relationships that are observed throughout

    the world today.

    Many anthropologists and some orthodontists

    suggest that vigorous chewing encourages

    development of robust, full sized lower jaws

    and some degree of wear minimized joint

    pain and crowding that are prevalent

    today.

  • In ancient Egypt, the greatest single problem was

    attrition, specifically the wear of the occlusal and proximal surfaces.

    The teeth were rapidly worn down throughout

    life by the consumption of a course diet. This was true for both pharaohs and commoners.

  • In time, the wear became so extensive that

    enamel and dentin were worn away, exposing the

    pulp.

    Painful chronic infection was the result. Dental

    surgeons of that time would drain the abscesses

    with the use of a hollow reed and had worked in

    teeth restoration and prostheses..

    High level of calculus accumulation were found

    and tooth loss for periodontal disease was

    moderately prevalent.

  • In European material, there is a gradual increase

    from very low rates through the Paleolithic,

    Neolithic, Bronze and Iron Age, to a rapid rise

    through Medieval and modern times.

  • GOING TO MODERN TIMES AND DENTAL

    CARIES AS AN ENDEMIC DISEASE

    5th to 6th centuries: MODERATE caries

    experience. More attrition, cervical & root caries.

    16 th century: MODERN pattern ( fissures &

    proximal surfaces caries), in HIGH-INCOME

    nations. ( Sugar crop at colonies)

  • DENTAL CARIES AS AN ENDEMIC DISEASE

    18 th century: dietary changes, increase in caries

    prevalence until 70s.

    The only break in this increase came during the mid 40s

    and early 50s and this coincided with the reduced

    availability of sucrose as a result of food rationing

    imposed during the World War II.

    19 th century: dental caries endemic disease.

  • NUMBER OF CARIOUS TEETH PER 100 TEETH

    IN FOUR EUROPEAN POPULATIONS, ADAPTED

    FROM KEAN, 1980

  • Increase in the number of caries is

    related to the:

    1. improvement of productivity (

    industrialization),

    2. the development of agriculture and

    3. food processing industry and

    4. increase of sugar intake amount.

  • ANCIENT X MODERN PEOPLE IN

    RELATION TO DENTAL CARIES

    Ancient people Modern people

    Proximal caries Occlusal pit &

    fissures caries

    Poor production

    tools and coarse

    food

    Industrialized

    refined food

    Low sugar

    comsumption

    High sugar

    comsuption

  • EPIDEMIOLOGY OF DENTAL CARIES

    GOING THROUGH THE 20S AND AFTER

    II WORLD WAR

    Most obvious reason: DIET

    For most of the 20 th century dental caries:

    Disease of the HIGH-INCOME countries

    Low prevalence in poorer countries

    By the late 20 century happened:

    Sharply RISING caries in some LOW INCOME countries after world war ( 1939-1945) especially urban areas.

    Significant caries reduction in HIGH-INCOME countries. Marked reduction among children and young adults eventhough caries remains the most common common chronic childhood disease.

    Most data: DMFT

  • CHANGING TRENDS IN DENTAL CARIES [DMFT

    OF 12 YR OLDS] IN DEVELOPED & DEVELOPING

    COUNTRIES

  • WHAT WERE THE CAUSES

    OF THE CHANGE OF

    DENTAL CARIES PATTERN

    IN THE LATE 20S IN

    DEVELOPED AND

    UNDEVELOPED

    COUNTRIES?

  • THIS WAS ATTRIBUTED TO:

    Dietary changes

    Fluorides

    Preventive programs

    (better oral hygiene)

  • file:///C:/Users/sony/Downloads/a01f01.gif

  • NUMBERS....

    Worldwide, approximately 2.43 billion people (36% of the population) have dental carries in their permanent teeth. In baby teeth it affects about 620 million people or 9% of the population.

    The disease is most prevalent in Latin American countries, countries in the Middle East, and South Asia, and least prevalent in China.

    Countries with good oral health programs decreased DMFT ( Brazil- Water fluoridation- Brazil Sorridente Oral Health Program)

    In the United States, dental caries is the most common chronic childhood disease, being at least five times more common than asthma.

    It is the primary pathological cause of tooth loss in children. Between 29 and 59% of adults over the age of fifty experience dental caries.

  • Caries continues to affects millions of

    adolescents and adults.

    Almost 94% of dentate adults showed

    evidence of coronal caries, and almost 23%

    root caries.

    The prevalence of caries in adults

    increase with age.

  • DENTAL CARIES AND DISPARITIES

    Developed countries (North America, Australia, Europe and Japan)......decreasing caries rate in children and increased number of retained teeth in older adults.

    There are disparities in this situation (developed countries) for:

    1. Developmentally disabled

    2. Mentally retarded

    3. Immigrant groups

    4. Low socioeconomic group individuals

    They present high levels of decay.

  • POLARIZATION

    Dental caries, in those countries, are largely a disease

    affecting the deprived section of the society.

    In many communities 60 to 80% of dental caries is

    occuring in 20 % of the population.

    of all affected teeth are found in of the

    population, constituting a small amount of people

    with the greatest severity of decay - polarization.

  • SIGNIFICANT CARIES INDEX SIC FOR 12

    YEAR OLD CHILDREN IN GERMANY

  • DENTAL CARIES, AN PANDEMIC DISEASE B.L. Edelstein (2006)

    Because: 1. those who are affected by caries and have litlle or no

    access to care number in the hundreds of millions,

    2. reside on all continents and in most societies,

    3. and experience significant consequences of pain and dysfunction that impair their most basic functions of eating, sleeping, speaking, being productive and enjoying general health as defined by the WHO.

  • FACTORS AFFECTING THE

    EPIDEMIOLOGY OF DENTAL CARIES

    Keyes triad ( carbohydrate (diet); bacteria ( dental

    plaque); susceptible teeth( the host)

    Modifying factors:

    Saliva, immune system, time, socioeconomical

    status, level of education, lifestyle behaviors,

    and the use of fluorides.

    The caries process can be described as loss of

    mineral (demineralization) when the pH of

    plaque drops below the critical value of 5.5.

    Redisposition of mineral ( remineralization) occurs

    when the pH of plaque rises.

    The presence of fluoride reduces the critical pH by 0.5

    pH units, thus exerting its protective effect.

  • Dr.Caroline Mohamed 33

  • HOST

    Susceptibility of different teeth: 1. Mandibular first and second molar

    2. Maxillary first and second molar

    3. Mandibular second bicuspids, maxilar

    first and second bicuspids, maxillary

    central and lateral incisors.

    4. Maxillary canines and mandibular first

    bicuspid.

    5. Mandibular central and lateral incisors,

    mandibular canines.

  • DEVELOPMENT OF CARIES WITHIN THE

    MOUTH/PERMANENT DENTITION

    First lesions: pits and fissures soon

    after eruption.

    The rapid onset of pit and fissures caries is

    expected because of the morphology of those

    pits and fissures where food debris is retained,

    and the enamel at the very depth of the fissures

    is often very thin or even absent.

  • IN CONTRAST, CARIES OF

    PROXIMAL SURFACES ARE

    SELDOM CLINICALLY EVIDENT

    UNTIL THE AFFECTED TOOTH

    HAS BEEN ERUPTED FOR TWO

    OR MORE YEARS.

  • CARIES OF CERVICAL

    AREAS OF TOOTH

    WHERE CEMENTUM

    HAS BEEN EXPOSED

    IS RELATED TO

    PROGRESSIVE

    CHANGE IN THE

    FREE MARGIN OF

    THE GINGIVA WHICH

    INCREASE

    SUSCEPTIBILITY TO

    PLAQUE FORMATION.

  • I. DEMOGRAPHIC RISK FACTORS

    1) AGE

    Mean DMF scores increase with age.

    The increase with age for children comes largely

    from an increase in number of restored teeth.(

    developed countries)

    Developing countries ( high levels of D, low levels of

    F). For the adult most of increase comes from

    missing teeth.

  • THE RELATION OF AGE AND CARIES

    In the past caries used to be considered a childhood

    disease ( as most susceptible surfaces were usually

    affected by the time the child reached adulthood).

    NOW ( developed countries) younger people reach

    adulthood with many surfaces free of caries, the

    carious attack is spread out more throughout life.

    Adults of ages can develop new coronal lesions, and

    caries has to be viewed as a lifetime disease.

  • 2) GENDER

    Females usually demonstrate higher

    DMF scores than males of the same

    age.

    WHY?

  • Women produce less saliva than do men,

    reducing the removal of food residue from the

    teeth, and during pregnancies the chemical

    composition changes, reducing salivas antimicrobial capacity.

    Food cravings, aversions (women crave high-

    energy, sweet foods related to pregnancy and in

    periodical hormonal changes).

    Undeveloped countries women normally

    have more pregnancies, less quality in

    nutrition, more caries.

  • THE RELATION BW GENDER AND DENTAL CARIES

    In children the different due to earlier eruption

    of the teeth in girls.

    In adults the treatment factor is more likely to

    be affecting the differences.

    In national surveys, males usually have more

    untreated decayed surfaces (D), and females

    have more restored teeth (F).

    The females are not more susceptible to

    caries than males, a combination of earlier

    tooth eruption plus, habits, hormonal

    changes and treatment factor is a more

    likely explanation for the observed

    difference.

  • WOMEN LOOK FOR TREATMENT MORE

    THAN MEN.

  • 3. RACE AND ETHNICITY

    Old observations showed that non-European

    races, such as those in Africa and India, enjoyed

    a greater freedom from caries.

    This global variation result more from

    environment rather than racial factors.

    Certain racial groups thought to be caries

    resistant, quicly developed caries when

    they migrate to areas with different culture

    and dietary pattern.

  • THE RELATION BW RACE & ETHNICITY AND

    DENTAL CARIES

    In the past there were wide DMF difference

    between whites and African-Americans ( W>AF),

    although the latter usually had more decayed

    teeth (D) as a result of lack to access to care.

    Now there is little difference in the total DMFs,

    although whites still had a higher filled (F)

    component and lower scores for decayed

    ( D) and missing surfaces (M).

  • THE RELATION BW RACE & ETHNICITY AND

    DENTAL CARIES

    There are NO inherent differences in susceptibility to

    dental caries bw different racial groups.

    Socio-economic differences ( i. e. Differences in

    education, self care practices, attitudes, value,

    income, and access to health care ) appear to be far

    more important.

  • 4. SOCIO-ECONOMIC STATUS SES

    SES is a broad measure of an individuals background in

    terms of such factors as education, income, occupation

    and attitude &values.

    SES usually measured by the annual income or years of

    education.

    SES is inversely related to the status of

    many diseases and to characteristics

    though to affect health.

    Lower SES groups had higher values of D and M,

    lower for F.

  • THE RELATION BW SES AND DENTAL CARIES

    Although fluoridation of water supplies reduces the

    difference bw the social classes, it doesnt entirely

    remove it.

    The greatest reduction in caries experience

    has been enjoyed by the upper social groups, where reduction is less in lower social groups.

    When planning treatment programs, caries

    experience expected to be more extensive and sever

    among low SES population.

  • 5) FAMILIAL AND GENETIC PATTERN

    Familial tendencies ( bad teeth run in families) are seen by

    many dentists and have been demonstrated by research.

    Such tendencies may have genetic basis such as:

    deep and narrow pits and fissures, and

    special arch form ( crowding) and/or

    salivary flow and composition

    o or from bacterial transmission or continuing familial

    dietary or behavioral traits.

  • THE RELATION BW FAMILIAL AND GENETIC PATTERN AND DENTAL CARIES

    Intrafamilial transmission of cariogenic flora

    especially from mother to infants is accepted as

    primary way for cariogenic bacteria to

    become established in children.

    Studies with identical twins concluded that

    whereas genetic factors could affect caries

    experience to some extent, the environmental

    variables were stronger.

  • WEB OF TRANSMISSION/

    PARENTS EDUCATION

    53

    Dr.C

    aro

    line M

    oh

    am

    ed

  • II. RISK FACTORS AND INDICATORS THE AGENT

    1) Bacterial infection

    Dental caries is a bacterial disease, bacteria is

    necessary for the disease to occur.

    The most important bacteria involved are:

    streptococos mutans and lactobacilli.

    These bacteria are normally present in the oral

    flora, so caries may be considered as an ecologic

    imbalance rather than an exogenous infection.

    Caries is described as a carbohydrate-modified

    bacterial infectious disease, in which cariogenic diet

    selectively favors cariogenic bacteria.

    Because infection with cariogenic bacteria is

    necessary condition for caries to occur, its considered as a

    risk factor for caries.

  • 2)NUTRITION AND CARIES Diet is the total oral intake of substances that provide nourishment and

    energy.

    Nutrition: refers to the absorption of nutrients.

    Inadequate Calcium intake for a prolonged period;

    Vitamin A, C and D deficiency,

    Iodine,

    fluoride,

    protein-energy malnutrition ( inadequate intake of protein, calories and micronutrients)

    have been associated to

    delays in tooth eruption,

    hypoplasia of the enamel,

    atrophy of the salivary glands, and

    impaired salivary antimicrobial activity;

    conditions that determine a greater susceptibility to caries and are causative factors in hypoplasia.

  • A specific type of enamel hypoplasia of primary

    teeth called linear enamel hypoplasia (LEH) is

    common in some economically

    underdeveloped countries.

    In children, who have signs of severe

    malnutrition (related to mal absorption,

    gastrointestinal disease and infection that

    may lead to hypocalcaemia), linear

    hypoplasia was present in up to 73% of the

    population.

  • VITAMIN D DEPENDENT RICKETS

    The structural damage can testify to the period

    in which the lack of nutrition occurred.

    The rate of enamel hypoplasia in primary teeth of

    children born prematurely is more than two fold (

    2X) that of controls.

  • Caries is found in countries where malnutrition

    during early childhood is common but where

    there is later exposure to cariogenic food; the

    malnutrition itself DOESNT produce dental

    caries whithout the later cariogenic challenge.

    Hypoplasia and pits on the surface of the

    enamel correlate to a lack of vitamin A.

  • 3) DIET AND CARIES

    In contrast with nutrition dietary factors have a

    clear influence on caries development.

    The relation bw the intake of refined CHO, and

    the prevalence and severity of caries is so strong

    that sugars are clearly a major etiologic

    factor in the causation of caries.

    Although the evidence that consumption of

    sugars is a major risk factor for caries, sugar

    arent the only food sources likely to be

    involved in the carious process.

  • Cooked or milled starches can be broken

    down to low molecular weight carbohydrates

    by the salivary amylase and thus act as a

    substrate for cariogenic bacteria.

    Large molecular weight CHO in uncooked or

    lightly cooked wegetables are considered non-

    cariogenic because little brekdown of these

    foods occurs in the mouth.

  • THE VIPEHOLM STUDY

    The Vipeholm Study was a study that dental researchers conducted on a group of mentally challenged residents of the Vipeholm Institution.

    Dental researchers fed mentally handicapped people lots of sugar for the purpose of studying tooth decay. Unfortunately, many of these patients ended up losing their teeth to cavities.

    Although the study is tragic and wouldn't be allowed to be done today due to ethics concerns, we learned a great deal about how foods cause cavities from this study.

    The participants in the study were all fed the same basic diet. The participants were divided up into seven groups to compare how subtle changes in the timing and quantity of sugar consumption affected their dental health.

  • THREE KEY GROUPS IN THE VIPEHOLM

    STUDY

    There are three key groups in the Vipeholm study that helped us understand

    more about how food affects the formation of a cavity on a tooth:

    1 - One group ate the original diet with an extra 300 grams

    of sugar dissolved in solution during their

    meals. That's the equivalent of drinking about five bottles of coke per day during meals!

    2 - Another group ate the basic diet with an extra 50

    grams of sugar mixed into their bread that

    they ate during mealtime.

    3 - The last group ate the basic diet, in between meals,

    this group also ate snacks of sugary toffee and

    candy.

  • WHICH GROUP ENDED UP

    GETTING THE MOST CAVITIES

    AND LOSING THE MOST

    TEETH?

  • The third group.

    When the sugar was consumed in between

    meals, it gave the bacteria more opportunities

    throughout the day to form cavities on the

    teeth.

    http://www.medicinhistoriskasyd.se/SMHS_bilder/thumbnail

    s.php?album=25&page=3

  • VIPEHOLM STUDY,( 1952), CONCLUDED THAT:

    1. Sugar consumption increase caries activity.

    2. The risk of increased caries activity is greater if the sugar

    is in a sticky form.

    3. The risk is greater if taken bw the meals and sticky

    form.

    4. The increase in caries under uniform conditions shows

    great individual variation.( 20 to 30% of the

    patients didnt have any caries although they

    consumed tofees bw meals)

    5. The increase in caries disappears upon withdrawl of

    sticky foodstuffs from the diet.

    6. Caries can still occur in the absence of refined sugar,

    natural sugars and total dietary CHO.

  • SUGAR CARIES RELATIONSHIP

    Are all the caries free children not consuming

    sugar or do other factors

    have a major influence?

  • SUGAR CARIES RELATIONSHIP

    Oral hygiene is an important co-variable in the

    sugar caries relationship.

    Consumption of sugars is not a major risk factor

    for many children ( those who were caries free

    and still ate a lot of sugar), but it is for these

    who are still clearly susceptible to caries (

    those presenting proximal caries)

    The caries is a multifactorial disease, and

    the caries risk is not always related to

    sugar consumption.

  • ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS THAT MAY

    AFFECT CARIES

    I) Climatological factors:

    Sunshine, temperature, relative humidity.

    Geographical disposition of developed and

    underdevelopment countries in temperate and

    tropical zones leads to this type of hypothesis.

  • Non-climatological factors:

    1) Fluoride

    The geologic formation as well as the distance from the sea coast affect the fluoride concentration in water supplies.

    2) Total water hardness

    It is measured in terms of calcium carbonate. There is inverse relationship bw caries and total water hardness.

    3) Trace elements

    They are elements found in water supplies and in common food. Such as Selenium which is a micronutrient element and it is capable of increasing caries particularly when consumed during the developmental period of teeth.

  • An overwhelming number of scientific studies

    conclude that cavity levels are falling

    worldwide even in countries which dont fluoridate water related possibly to good oral

    hygiene habits, fluoridated toothpaste and

    community OH programs.

    To Fluoridate or not fluoridate,

    thats the question

  • ACTIVITIES

    Make a resume about: The Vipeholm Dental

    Caries Study: recollections and reflections 50

    years later.

    How to find it:

    The Vipeholm Dental Caries Study: recollections

    and reflections 50 ...

    www.researchgate.net/.../11439564_The_Vipehol

    m_... -

    Right side of page click VIEW

    Read and make a 1 page resume.

  • THANK YOU