10-year review diversity at msudiversity at msu. 2015 - 2016 student and workforce ... data report....

10
DIVERSITY AT MSU 2015 - 2016 Student and Workforce Data Report 10-YEAR REVIEW Valuing Differences

Upload: others

Post on 02-Jun-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 10-YEAR REVIEW DIVERSITY AT MSUDIVERSITY AT MSU. 2015 - 2016 Student and Workforce ... Data Report. 10-YEAR REVIEW Valuing Differences ~ 2~ Introduction: The 2015-16 data report is

D I V E R S I T Y A T M S U2015 - 2016 Student and Workforce

Data Report

1 0 - Y E A R R E V I E W

ValuingDifferences

Page 2: 10-YEAR REVIEW DIVERSITY AT MSUDIVERSITY AT MSU. 2015 - 2016 Student and Workforce ... Data Report. 10-YEAR REVIEW Valuing Differences ~ 2~ Introduction: The 2015-16 data report is

~2~

Introduction:The 2015-16 data report is a ten-year comparison of students and the workforce during 2006 and

2016. Data categories include race/ethnicity, gender, self-identified veterans, and people with dis-

abilities in the workforce. Workforce data highlights all employment categories including academic

and support staff. It is important to note that new federal guidelines for collecting and report-ing data on race and ethnicity became effective in 2010. The changes included the separation of

“Asian/Pacific Islander” category into two new categories: “Asian” and “Native Hawaiian or Other

Pacific Islander.” This is also the first time individuals had the opportunity to identify as belonging to

more than one race. These changes are in the report. We extend thanks to units that contributed to the report: Office of Planning and Budgets, Admissions Office, The Graduate School, Associate

Provost for Undergraduate Education, Associate Provost and Associate Vice President for Academ-

ic Human Resources, the Associate Vice President for Human Resources, the Resource Center for

Persons with Disabilities, and University Services.

Overall, data shows progress in several areas, particularly among Hispanic student populations

and Hispanic tenure system faculty. For students, recent efforts through the Neighborhood Student

Success Collaborative are beginning to show positive results. Although some challenges remain in

terms of the graduation rates, specifically among Black/African American students, MSU observed

fewer Black/African American students on academic probation after their first semester in 2016.

Similarly, while Native American/American Indian student enrollment numbers have dropped in the

past 10 years, their graduation rates have increased and probation rates have decreased. Despite

the strong commitment from campus to diversify the faculty, we continue to face hiring and reten-

tion challenges, not only with recruiting underrepresented faculty, particularly within STEM fields,

but also ensuring their retention over the long term. During the same review period, the declining

number of Black/African American tenure system faculty is of concern. New initiatives launched in fall 2016 to support faculty includes efforts of the Academic Advancement Network (www.aan.

msu.edu) and the Diversity Research Network (www.inclusion.msu.edu). Both provide strategic

opportunities to thrive in academe, which is intended to increase the retention rate of all faculty, in

particular women and faculty of color, at MSU.

Federal Guidelines and Definitions of Terms Used• American Indian or Alaska Native. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of North and

South America (including Central America), and who maintains tribal affiliation or community attach-ment.

• Asian. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia, or the In-dian subcontinent including, for example, Cambodia, China, India, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the Philippine Islands, Thailand, and Vietnam.

• Black or African American. A person having origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa. Termssuch as “Haitian” or “Negro” can be used in addition to “Black or African American.”

• Hispanic or Latino. A person of Cuban, Mexican, Puerto Rican, South or Central American, or otherSpanish culture or origin, regardless of race. The term, “Spanish origin,” can be used in addition to “His-panic or Latino.”

• Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of Ha-waii, Guam, Samoa, or other Pacific Islands.

• White. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa.

DATA REPORT

Page 3: 10-YEAR REVIEW DIVERSITY AT MSUDIVERSITY AT MSU. 2015 - 2016 Student and Workforce ... Data Report. 10-YEAR REVIEW Valuing Differences ~ 2~ Introduction: The 2015-16 data report is

~3~

81.9%76.7%

Whit

e

5.7% 5.8%

Asian

America

n Ind

ian/

Alaska

n Nati

ve

NA

3.1%

Two or M

ore Rac

es

NA

Native

Haw

aiian

/

Pacific I

sland

er

3.2%

4.8%

Hispan

ic/La

tino

8.4%

7.8%

Black/A

frica

n

America

n

0.7%310

0.1%57

2,3

88

2,4

91

3,5

23

3,3

40

34

,412

33

,05

8

1,3

48

1,3

60

2,0

76

0.3%127

3,3

31

7.8%

2,3

39

5.4%

2,0

32

4.7%

1,2

79

3.0%

33

,20

9

77.3%

1200.3%

46

This

bar

has

bee

n tr

unca

ted

to �

t on

this

pag

e

0.1%

Total US Students by Race/Ethnicity*

TOTAL STUDENT ENROLLMENT

Number of Students Enrolled

Total Minority Students

Total International Students

18.1% 21.9%7,581 9,439

7.7% 14.4%3,527 7,269

1.6

Between 2006 and 2016, MSU’s

Hispanic/Latino student population

increased by

0.4

Between 2006 and 2016, MSU’s

American Indian / Alaskan Native

student population decreased by

Number of Students Enrolled

45,520

50,344

2006 2016

2006 2016

2015: 50,543

2006 2015 2016

Women 24,825 26,067 26,039

54.5% 51.6% 51.7%

Men 20,695 24,476 24,305

45.5% 48.4% 48.3%

Total Students by Gender

2015: 9,147/21.3% 2015: 7,572/15.0%

* NA: Prior to 2010, federal guidelines for collecting and reporting of data on race and ethnicity did not include the separation of “Asian/Pacific Islander”, the addition of “Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander”, and belonging to more than one race. Percentages are out of domestic total. Blank or no response answers not represented in totals.

percentagepoints

percentagepoints

Page 4: 10-YEAR REVIEW DIVERSITY AT MSUDIVERSITY AT MSU. 2015 - 2016 Student and Workforce ... Data Report. 10-YEAR REVIEW Valuing Differences ~ 2~ Introduction: The 2015-16 data report is

~4~

81.9%76.8%

Whit

e

5.6% 5.7%

Asian

America

n Ind

ian/

Alaska

n Nati

ve

NA

3.4%

Two or M

ore Rac

es

NA

Native

Haw

aiian

/

Pacific I

sland

er

3.1%

4.8%

Hispan

ic/La

tino

8.7%

8.0%

Black/A

frica

n

America

n

0.7%255

0.1%36

1,9

34

1,9

46

2,9

94

2,7

24

28

,24

6

26

,16

9

1,15

5

1,0

59

1,6

29

0.3%88

This

bar

has

bee

n tr

unca

ted

to �

t on

this

pag

e

1,8

16

5.4%

2,7

00

8.0%

1,5

73

4.6%

1,0

75

3.2%

26

,23

1

77.4%

0.3%87

0.1%30

US Undergraduate Students by Race/Ethnicity*

UNDERGRADUATE ENROLLMENT

Number of Undergraduate Students Enrolled

35,82139,090

Undergraduate Minority Students

Undergraduate International Students

Undergraduate Gender

18.1% 22.3%6,242 7,578

3.7% 12.8%1,333 5,013

2006 2016

Between 2006 and 2016, MSU’s Undergraduate student population increased by

9.1%

2006 2016

0.7

Between 2006 and 2016, MSU’s Undergraduate

Black/African American student population decreased

1.7

Between 2006 and 2016, MSU’s Undergraduate Hispanic/Latino

student populationincreased

2006 2015 2016

Women 19,217 19,728 19,778

53.6% 50.4% 50.6%

Men 16,604 19,415 19,312

46.4% 49.6% 49.4%

2015: 39,143

2015: 7,281/21.5% 2015: 5,286/13.5%

* NA: Prior to 2010, federal guidelines for collecting and reporting of data on race and ethnicity did not include the separation of “Asian/Pacific Islander”, the addition of “Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander”, and belonging to more than one race. Percentages are out of domestic total. Blank or no response answers not represented in totals.

percentagepoints percentage

points

Page 5: 10-YEAR REVIEW DIVERSITY AT MSUDIVERSITY AT MSU. 2015 - 2016 Student and Workforce ... Data Report. 10-YEAR REVIEW Valuing Differences ~ 2~ Introduction: The 2015-16 data report is

~5~

79.4% 74.7%

Whit

e

6.2% 6.6%

Asian

America

n Ind

ian/

Alaska

n Nati

ve

NA

3.9%

Two or M

ore Rac

es

NA

Native

Haw

aiian

/

Pacific I

sland

er

3.1%

4.3%

Hispan

ic/La

tino

8.8%

7.8%

Black/A

frica

n

America

n

0.7%46

0.1%7

43

3

45

1

63

9

619

5,5

55

5,1

30

26

6

22

8

34

1

0.2%16

417

6.0%

65

6

9.4%

37

3

5.4%

23

8

3.4%

180.3%

This

bar

has

bee

n tr

unca

ted

to �

t on

this

pag

e5

,20

4

74.9%

.04%3

US First-Time Entering Class Students by Race/Ethnicity*

FIRST-TIME ENTERING CLASS ENROLLMENT

Number of First-Time Entering Class Students Enrolled

7,256

7,950

First-Time Entering Class Minority Students

First-Time Entering Class International Students

First-Time Entering Class Gender

19.2% 24.7%1,346 1,700

3.6% 13.6%263 1,080

1.0

Between 2006 and 2016,

MSU’s First Time Entering Class

Black/African American student population

decreased by

2006 2016

1.2

Between 2006 and 2016, MSU’s

First Time Entering Class Hispanic/Latino

student population increased by

2006 2016

2015: 7,967

2015: 1,705/24.5%

2006 2015 2016

Women 4,107 4,265 4,179

56.6% 53.5% 52.6%

Men 3,149 3,702 3,771

43.4% 46.5% 47.4%

2015: 1,016/12.8%

* NA: Prior to 2010, federal guidelines for collecting and reporting of data on race and ethnicity did not include the separation of “Asian/Pacific Islander”, the addition of “Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander”, and belonging to more than one race. Percentages are out of domestic total. Blank or no response answers not represented in totals.

percentagepoints

percentagepoints

Page 6: 10-YEAR REVIEW DIVERSITY AT MSUDIVERSITY AT MSU. 2015 - 2016 Student and Workforce ... Data Report. 10-YEAR REVIEW Valuing Differences ~ 2~ Introduction: The 2015-16 data report is

~6~

PERSISTENCE AND GRADUATION RATES FOR UNDERGRADUATES

First-Year Persistence Rate

Six-Year Graduation Rate

All Students

All Students

American Indian/ Alaskan Native

Asian/Hawaiian/ Pacific Islander

Asian/Hawaiian/ Pacific Islander

Black/African American

Black/African American

Hispanic/Latino

Hispanic/Latino

White

White

International

International

2006 2016

92.5%

82.9% 82.4%

73.8%

85.4%

84.2%84.1% 84.6%

77.9%

83.3%

90.9%

93.1%

82.2%

91.9%91.3%

75.5%

100%

95%

85%

90%

80%

100%

90%

80%

70%

60%

50%

90.4%

54.0%

59.6%

54.8%

67.3%57.5%

70.0%

89.9%

74.0%

78.1%

Entry year: 2000-2006 2010-2016

55.2%

69.2%

American Indian/ Alaskan Native

1.4

Between 2006 and 2016, MSU’s

undergraduate persistence rate for all

students increased

Between 2006 and 2016, MSU’s total

graduation rate for all students increased

4.1

12.5

Between 2006 and 2016, MSU’s Hispanic/Latino graduation rate

increased by

Students who are more successful during their first semester are far

more likely to graduate from

college than are their peers who struggle

in those first few months.

* NA: Prior to 2010, federal guidelines for collecting and reporting of data on race and ethnicity did not include the separation of “Asian/Pacific Islander”, the addition of “Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander”, and belonging to more than one race. Percentages are out of domestic total. Blank or no response answers not represented in totals.

*

*

percentagepoints

percentagepoints

percentagepoints

Page 7: 10-YEAR REVIEW DIVERSITY AT MSUDIVERSITY AT MSU. 2015 - 2016 Student and Workforce ... Data Report. 10-YEAR REVIEW Valuing Differences ~ 2~ Introduction: The 2015-16 data report is

~7~

STUDENT SUCCESS

71%

81%

19%Overall increase in use

since NSSC started tracking in 2013

Increase Use of Academic Services

Hispanic / Latino StudentsUse at least one academic resource

Black/African American StudentsUse at least one academic resource

Academic Probation StatusOf First-Time Freshmen

7244156

All Students

Black/African American Students

International Students

Hispanic/Latino Students

Fewer

Fewer

Fewer

Fewer

Decreasing the likelihood of academic probation after the first semester, increases the likelihood of graduation

from MSU.

Over the last five years, the number of freshman on academic probation at the end of their first semester in college has

dropped from the historic average of approximately 10

percent to 7 percent.

The Neighborhood Student Success Collaborative (NSSC) tracks the use

of resources including participation in academic advising, tutoring, study skills workshops, fitness classes,

University Activities Board events, and Multi-racial Unity Living

Experience discussions in the residence halls.

Page 8: 10-YEAR REVIEW DIVERSITY AT MSUDIVERSITY AT MSU. 2015 - 2016 Student and Workforce ... Data Report. 10-YEAR REVIEW Valuing Differences ~ 2~ Introduction: The 2015-16 data report is

~8~

57.3%76.7%

Whit

e

6% 6.1%

Asian

America

n Ind

ian/

Alaska

n Nati

ve

*NA

2.1%

Two or M

ore Rac

es

*NA

Native

Haw

aiian

/

Pacific I

sland

er

4.0%

5.0%

Hispan

ic/La

tino

7.0% 6.8%

Black/A

frica

n

America

n

0.7%55 0.2%

21

45

4

54

5

52

9

616

5,5

61

6,2

61

193

30

1

44

7

0.4%39

2.2%

52

3

5.7%

0.4%33

63

1

6.9%

45

9

5.0%

0.2%16

20

4

76.6%

6,8

89

This

bar

has

bee

n tr

unca

ted

to �

t on

this

pag

e

US Graduate and Graduate Professional Students by Race/Ethnicity*

GRADUATE AND GRADUATE PROFESSIONAL ENROLLMENT

Number of Graduate and Graduate Professional Students Enrolled

9,699

11,254

Graduate and Graduate Professional Minority Students

Graduate and Graduate Professional International Students

Graduate and Graduate Professional Gender

17.8% 20.7%1,339 1,861

22.6% 20.0%2,194 2,256

2006 2016

16.0%Between 2006 and 2016,

MSU’s graduate and graduate professional

student population increased by

2015: 11,400

2006 2016

2006 2015 2016

Women 5,561 6,339 6,261

57.3% 55.6% 55.6%

Men 4,138 5.061 4,993

42.7% 44.4% 44.4%

2015: 1,866/20.5% 2015: 2,304/20.2%

* NA: Prior to 2010, federal guidelines for collecting and reporting of data on race and ethnicity did not include the separation of “Asian/Pacific Islander”, the addition of “Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander”, and belonging to more than one race. Percentages are out of domestic total. Blank or no response answers not represented in totals.

Page 9: 10-YEAR REVIEW DIVERSITY AT MSUDIVERSITY AT MSU. 2015 - 2016 Student and Workforce ... Data Report. 10-YEAR REVIEW Valuing Differences ~ 2~ Introduction: The 2015-16 data report is

~9~

TOTAL FACULTY AND STAFF

Number of Faculty and Academic Staff

Number of Tenure System Faculty

Number of Support Staff

4,785

1,961

5,894

5,556

1,988

6,852

2006 2016

Faculty and Academic Staff

Tenure System Faculty

Support Staff

Race/Ethnicity 2006 2015 2016 2006 2015 2016 2006 2015 2016

American Indian/Alaskan Native

31 26 26 16 15 14 43 29 29

Asian 547 813 833 194 281 299 128 186 181

Black/African American

284 317 323 105 88 86 437 417 438

Hispanic/Latino 141 206 231 56 96 101 308 372 376

Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander

NA* 11 11 NA* 3 4 NA* 1 1

Two or More Races

NA* 26 24 NA* 11 7 NA* 44 46

Total Minorities 1,003 1,399 1,447 374 494 511 916 1,049 1,071

White 3,782 3,954 4,109 1,587 1,451 1,477 4,978 5,681 5,781

Women 2,037 2,414 2,540 616 669 709 3,845 4,136 4,192

2015: 5,353

2015: 1,945

2015: 6,730

Between 2006 and 2016

Asian faculty and academic staff increased by

Black/African American tenure system faculty decreased by

Hispanic/Latino tenure system faculty increased by

1.1%

2.2%

3.6%

Faculty and Staff by Race/Ethnicity

* NA: Prior to 2010, federal guidelines for collecting and reporting of data on race and ethnicity did not include the separation of “Asian/Pacific Islander”, the addition of “Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander”, and belonging to more than one race. Percentages are out of domestic total. Blank or no response answers not represented in totals.

Page 10: 10-YEAR REVIEW DIVERSITY AT MSUDIVERSITY AT MSU. 2015 - 2016 Student and Workforce ... Data Report. 10-YEAR REVIEW Valuing Differences ~ 2~ Introduction: The 2015-16 data report is

~10~

2015-2016 1-YEAR REVIEW:VETERANS, PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES, SERVICES OFFERED AND SUPPLIER DIVERSITYSelf-Identified Veteran Employees

Resource Center for Persons with DisabilitiesServices Offered

Self-Identified Employees with Disabilities

Total Veteran Employees Decreased by

23/8.3%

Total Employees with Disabilities Increased by

26/13.8%

Minority Veteran Employees Decreased by

1/2.6%

Minority Employees with Disabilities Increased by

3/7.9%

Women Veteran Employees Decreased by

3/5.3%

Women Employees with Disabilities Increased by

17/16.0%

2015-2016 % Increase Newly Registered Contact Hours

Students 1785 12 512 23,329

Employees 191 17 42 724

Supplier Diversity

$41,489,215 Total Diversity Spend

65% Women Owned

20% Total Minority Owned

1% Disabled Veteran Owned

6% Veteran Owned

RPCD Registered

The Michigan State University Supplier Diversity Program

encourages business opportunities for minority

business enterprises (MBE), woman-owned business

enterprises (WBE), small businesses and other disadvantaged businesses

255

38

54

214

41

123