1001msc-sec-104795-3151-1-1 (1)

Student Experience of Course (SEC) - Detail ReportProduced on 15 Jun 2015, 3:10 pm by Billy Williams-Noonan (s2720416). Survey ID: 104795-3151-1-1

School: School of Medical Science Course: Essentials of Chem and Physics - 1001MSC Campus/MoD: GC / P

Group: Griffith Health Semester: Semester 1 2015 (3151) Course size: 837

Convenor(s): William Wen Participation: 40.3% (337 of 837)

Class(es): EXM/E101, LAB/B101, LAB/B102, LAB/B103, LAB/B104, LAB/B105, LAB/B106, LAB/B107,LAB/B108, LAB/B109, LAB/B110, LAB/B111, LAB/B112, LAB/B113, LAB/B114, LAB/B115,LEC/L101, LEC/L102, LEC/L103, TUT/T101, TUT/T102, TUT/T103, TUT/T104, TUT/T105,TUT/T106, TUT/T107, TUT/T108, TUT/T109, TUT/T110, TUT/T111, TUT/T112, TUT/T113,TUT/T114, TUT/T115

Size/part: 837 / 40.3% (337)

Quantitative Summary:

Question

#

Score

Quartile BandComparison

%+ve%-ve

Median

Stddev

Mean

QuartileBandRank

Comparativemean

25% 50% 75%

Q1 This course waswell-organised.

10816943104

SAAND

SD

32.3%50.6%

12.9%3%1.2%

32.6%48.3%

12.8%4.9%

1.4%

+82.9-4.2

4 0.82 4.1 3.8 4.0 4.3 3

Q2 The assessment was clearand fair.

12016037161

SAAND

SD

35.9%47.9%

11.1%4.8%

0.3%

30.7%46%

14.7%6.4%

2.1%

+83.8-5.1

4 0.82 4.1 3.7 4.0 4.2 3

Q3 I received helpful feedbackon my assessment work.

63110121345

SAAND

SD

18.9%33%36.3%

10.2%1.5%

23.4%36.5%

29.3%8.2%

2.7%

+51.9-11.7

4 0.96 3.6 3.5 3.7 3.9 2

Q4 This course engaged me inlearning.

7413880375

SAAND

SD

22.2%41.3%

24%11.1%

1.5%

30.1%41.9%

18%7.4%

2.6%

+63.5-12.6

4 0.98 3.7 3.7 3.9 4.2 2

Q5 The teaching (lecturers,tutors, online etc) on thiscourse was effective inhelping me to learn.

12213950157

SAAND

SD

36.6%41.7%

15%4.5%2.1%

34.7%42.8%

15.1%5.4%2.1%

+78.3-6.6

4 0.94 4.1 3.8 4.0 4.3 3

Q6 Overall I am satisfied withthe quality of this course.

8717650163

SAAND

SD

26.2%53%

15.1%4.8%

0.9%

28.9%47.3%

16%5.6%

2.1%

+79.2-5.7

4 0.83 4.0 3.7 3.9 4.2 3

Legend

5pt Likert scale: SD - Strongly Disagree, D - Disagree, N - Neutral, A - Agree, SA - Strongly Agree QUARTILE BANDING SCORING: A score 1, 2, 3, or 4 will be assigned depending on which quartile band your mean score falls within. Quartile scores are based on aggregate datacalculated from a matrix of Group x Course/Class Size. The comparison is made between courses within the SAME group and of the SAME size (<21, 21-50, 51-200, 200+). A score will onlybe assigned if more than three courses exist (from any semester) within the same category. # This is a custom question.

'Griffith Student Experience of Courses and Teaching' Survey System /55






Size/part: 837 / 40.3% (337)

Qualitative Responses:

Q7 What did you find particularly good about this course? Resp#: 227 / Class

1 Most of the information and knowledge is well presented in the lecture manual LEC/L101, TUT/T103,EXM/E101, LAB/B112

2 Well organised lecture notes Constant reminder of what was ahead LEC/L101, TUT/T104,EXM/E101, LAB/B106

3 The support by the lab teachers (or assistants), the additional questions/resources in Blackboard. Great assistance. LEC/L101, TUT/T104,EXM/E101, LAB/B109

4 could be interesting content LEC/L101, TUT/T104,EXM/E101, LAB/B112

5 Assessment was well set out and expectations clear. The online video's and assistance made understanding the materialeasier. Having extra tutorials and review questions prior to exams was a tremendous help.

LEC/L101, LAB/B102,EXM/E101, TUT/T112

6 The videos available by Brock Grant assisted my learning substantially and I would accredit for the reason I achieved a65% pass on the mid-semester


7 Exam questions structured so 60% easier, and then just 15-20% difficult, enables weaker students to do well. Lecturecontent well covered and re-emphasised in lectures.


8 Brock and his videos were especially helpful, having his assistance I'm sure helped many including myself, a credit tohimself, and the university how much effort he puts into helping others succeed. Tutorials were always imformative, and alllecturers had time to answer any and all questions, even repeatedly.

LEC/L101, LAB/B111,TUT/T103, EXM/E101

9 The labs were fun LEC/L101, LAB/B113,EXM/E101, TUT/T114

10 Most concepts were clear and concise. LEC/L101, LAB/B114,EXM/E101, TUT/T102

11 I found that the lecturers and lab tutors were very good with helping when i needed LEC/L101, LAB/B114,EXM/E101, TUT/T106

12 Brock Grants assistance with the course LEC/L101, LAB/B114,EXM/E101, TUT/T108

13 The laboratories. LEC/L101, EXM/E101,TUT/T101, LAB/B101

14 The extra help from online tutorials and that the lecturers/tutors responded to student enquiries. LEC/L101, EXM/E101,TUT/T105, LAB/B108

15 Chemistry, but would have liked a pass class for this course LEC/L101, EXM/E101,TUT/T106, LAB/B105

16 That i can apply it to other courses such as anatomy in order to understand certain aspects of that course's theory better. LEC/L101, EXM/E101,TUT/T108, LAB/B105

17 teachers are patient to help provided practical questions before each quiz or exam facebook page and L@G discussionboard online tutorials

LEC/L101, EXM/E101,TUT/T109, LAB/B105

18 lectures and tutors where well equipped and helpful LEC/L101, EXM/E101,LAB/B106, TUT/T102

19 The tutors who took the weekly tutorials were very helpful and understanding LEC/L101, EXM/E101,LAB/B106, TUT/T106

20 The additional support this year via the FB page and the videos that Brock did was amazing. I found these two tools morebeneficial than the lectures. I hope that Brock is recognised within the faculty for his contribution to this course. He is amamazing teacher and mentor.

LEC/L101, EXM/E101,LAB/B107, TUT/T101

21 im not sure LEC/L101, EXM/E101,LAB/B114, TUT/T106

22 The well planned spacing between assessments LEC/L101, EXM/E101,LAB/B115, TUT/T106

LEC/L102, EXM/E101,

Legend








Size/part: 837 / 40.3% (337)

23 The lecturers taught the content well and made it easy to understand for those who had never done chemistry or physicsbefore. The labs were also fun and engaging.

TUT/T104, LAB/B113

24 giving plenty of resources to learn, such as Brock's videos TUT/T101, LEC/L102,LAB/B101, EXM/E101

25 I received a useful introduction to an understanding of physics and chemistry TUT/T101, LEC/L102,EXM/E101, LAB/B103

26 Everyone involved was very willing and qualified to answer any questions I had. All the content was explained clearly andeffectively.

TUT/T101, LAB/B113,EXM/E101, LEC/L101

27 The addition of Brock Grants assistance was incredibly helpful. His videos were fantastic and he was always available toanswer questions. 10/10 for Brocks efforts and extra assistance.

TUT/T101, EXM/E101,LEC/L101, LAB/B108

28 It was fun and interesting. TUT/T101, EXM/E101,LEC/L102, LAB/B106

29 I found the order in which we learnt some of the chemistry was better than the order in which I learnt it in Highschool TUT/T101, EXM/E101,LEC/L102, LAB/B107

30 The content covered was interesting, and lecturers/tutors helped in explaining anything that was unclear. TUT/T101, EXM/E101,LEC/L103, LAB/B104

31 Everything topic was explained really well . TUT/T102, LAB/B110,EXM/E101, LEC/L102

32 Good lecturers, tutorials make everything clear TUT/T102, LAB/B111,LEC/L102, EXM/E101

33 good teaching team, helpful lab tutours TUT/T102, LAB/B113,LEC/L102, EXM/E101

34 i found a lot of the information i had already covered in high school therefore it was easy for me to understand the newinformation as well


35 William Wen is amazing TUT/T102, EXM/E101,LEC/L102, LAB/B103

36 William Wen is a great lecturer. Easy to listen to and remember things because he makes them funny so you do rememberit.

TUT/T102, EXM/E101,LAB/B102, LEC/L102

37 lecture notes were organised TUT/T103, LAB/B114,EXM/E101, LEC/L102

38 online videos and Mr Williams teaching. TUT/T103, EXM/E101,LEC/L102, LAB/B109

39 The two lecturers, who were able to give different explanations/views for the topics. TUT/T106, LEC/L102,LAB/B109, EXM/E101

40 Multiple revision sheets TUT/T106, LEC/L102,EXM/E101, LAB/B114

41 Content was easy to understand especially after doing high school chemistry and the lecturers revisiting these topics TUT/T106, LEC/L102,EXM/E101, LAB/B115

42 Really easy, both Andrew and William are extremely helpful TUT/T106, LEC/L103,EXM/E101, LAB/B115

43 Covered the basics of Chemistry and Physics in a logical, interesting and concise way. It was easy to follow and the labsoften added value to the course by applying what we learnt in theory. The assessment was consistent in fairness anddifficulty. I liked the extra resource of online videos/tutorials was very helpful when I had trouble with some concepts.

TUT/T106, LAB/B110,LEC/L102, EXM/E101

44 Lecturer William Wen very engaging TUT/T106, LAB/B110,EXM/E101, LEC/L102

45 the course was good, just the right amount of work TUT/T106, LAB/B111,EXM/E101, LEC/L103

46 - TUT/T106, LAB/B113,LEC/L102, EXM/E101

47 Brock's videos were exceptionally helpful in revision and lecture notes were clear and succinct. TUT/T106, EXM/E101,LAB/B113, LEC/L102

Legend








Size/part: 837 / 40.3% (337)

48 I Find it easy TUT/T106, EXM/E101,LAB/B113, LEC/L102

49 Lecturers related topics to everyday life making it easier to grasp concepts. Lecture notes, questions and exam preparationis well organised and very much helpful for succeeding in this course.

TUT/T107, LEC/L102,EXM/E101, LAB/B104

50 Good use of time and staff always happy to help students. Always very friendly and approachable TUT/T107, EXM/E101,LAB/B113, LEC/L102

51 Decent spacing between assessment. Allows you to plan and prepare for exams aswell as juggling other subjects. Succintinformation in lecture notes yet still detailed and clear Numerous exercises allowing to practice questions and understandthe topics Tutorials Brocks Tutorials


52 Lectures were clear and concise. TUT/T108, LAB/B110,EXM/E101, LEC/L101

53 Lecture Note and organisation of weekly exercises and review questions TUT/T108, LAB/B110,EXM/E101, LEC/L101

54 Online tutorials TUT/T108, EXM/E101,LEC/L103, LAB/B104

55 Online Lecture Notes TUT/T108, EXM/E101,LEC/L103, LAB/B109

56 The Facebook page is legendary. Got a question? Facebook. Need to ask a question? Facebook. Need to cry aboutscience? Facebook.


57 The online videos and tutes that Brock did were outstanding. It was great to be able to watch those videos when you needto touch up on a few skills.


58 lectures were interesting an engaging TUT/T109, LEC/L102,LAB/B104, EXM/E101

59 Was easy after completing high school chemistry TUT/T109, EXM/E101,LEC/L103, LAB/B104

60 Professor Wen's extreme passion definitely helped with the learning process and his examples were always helpful andefficient


61 Tutorials for chemistry were really good. TUT/T109, EXM/E101,LEC/L103, LAB/B109

62 Awesome teaching staff. I liked the pace of the content. The labs and the lab staff were excellent. TUT/T111, LEC/L103,LAB/B104, EXM/E101

63 It was straight forward and easy to understand TUT/T111, LEC/L103,LAB/B107, EXM/E101

64 ability to talk to teachers who are nice and approachable and tutors are helpful TUT/T111, LAB/B110,LEC/L102, EXM/E101

65 As chemistry being a confusing subject in general, I found when Dr. Andrew Pearson took the lectures on biologicalmolecules the lectures and concepts were very clearly taught and that made a huge difference coming up to exams.


66 This course was the most organised ever. Lecturers and lab tutors were also excellent. They always explain in a familiarand easier way, so I could feel very engaged.


67 The lecturer (william wen) made everything interesting to learn TUT/T111, LAB/B113,EXM/E101, LEC/L102

68 I really enjoyed the videos that both Brock and Andrew Pearson uploaded to learning at griffith, as they were short, snappy,to the point, but still extremely helpful. They were also easy to access and simplified and slowed things down for those ofus who had never studied chemistry before.


69 William and Andrew were great lecturers and always willing the provide feedback. TUT/T111, EXM/E101,LEC/L102, LAB/B102

70 Tutorials were very helpful TUT/T111, EXM/E101,LEC/L103, LAB/B107

71 The organisation of the course TUT/T111, EXM/E101,LEC/L103, LAB/B108

Legend








Size/part: 837 / 40.3% (337)

72 William Wen as the lecturer - he makes learning entertaining and enjoyable TUT/T111, EXM/E101,LAB/B101, LEC/L101

73 Dr William Wei lectures TUT/T112, LAB/B110,EXM/E101, LEC/L103

74 The tutorial videos Brock creates are very helpful. It was clear and straight to the point. It helped me alot with this course. TUT/T112, LAB/B114,EXM/E101, LEC/L101

75 I enjoyed William's teaching method ( I liked his jokes) TUT/T112, EXM/E101,LEC/L102, LAB/B103

76 I found it relatively easy and the help found on the Facebook group was great TUT/T112, EXM/E101,LEC/L102, LAB/B104

77 The amount of content was appropriate and provided a good 'refresh' of yr 11 and 12 content. The online videos providedby Brock are fantastic.


78 The lectures were good, although I don't see how physics will be useful for me again. Having multiple assessments duringthe semester was beneficial to study the subject throughout the semester, in order to stay up to date with the material.


79 Having lots of small weighted assessment throughout semester. TUT/T112, EXM/E101,LEC/L103, LAB/B108

80 It really pushed me to teach myself chemistry, it was very rewarding to get good marks after putting in a lot of effort TUT/T112, EXM/E101,LEC/L103, LAB/B109

81 I found this course to provide good, quality information that we could take and study, there wasn't much excess informationthat served no use. I liked that during the lectures we would revise previous content before starting new content.


82 the online tutorials were quite good TUT/T113, LEC/L102,LAB/B114, EXM/E101

83 We were always really well prepared for the assessment pieces. The content was taught really well during the lectures, andthen that was really well reinforced during the tutorials. What was really a standout of this course was the online tutorialsand the online support that we received from both Grant and Andrew, they were constantly available to answer anyquestions or queries, and keep us up to date with our studies through the online tutorials.

TUT/T113, LEC/L103,LAB/B102, EXM/E101

84 tutorials to go through the questions was very helpful TUT/T113, LEC/L103,LAB/B104, EXM/E101

85 The tutorials and Brock Grant's tutorial (Youtube videos)! TUT/T113, LEC/L103,EXM/E101, LAB/B105

86 I LOVE WILLIAM WEN TUT/T113, LEC/L103,EXM/E101, LAB/B105

87 The order of content and incorporation of the lecture content in with the laboratories. And the tutorials are good. TUT/T113, LEC/L103,EXM/E101, LAB/B112

88 'Bones' the lab tutor was engaging and a good teacher, and william wen's jokes kept me going throughout the semester TUT/T113, LEC/L103,EXM/E101, LAB/B112

89 The lectures started late and finished early TUT/T113, LAB/B110,EXM/E101, LEC/L103

90 Love this course Staff are amazing (lecturers, tutors, Brock Grant (videos) etc) TUT/T113, LAB/B111,EXM/E101, LEC/L103

91 i loved how it was complicated and fun to learn TUT/T113, LAB/B111,EXM/E101, LEC/L103

92 I found order in which the content was taught very helpful in building up my knowledge. TUT/T113, LAB/B113,LEC/L102, EXM/E101

93 We were given lots of review questions to attempt ourselves. And there were more questions to do if we felt we neededmore practice. Brock's online tutorials were awesome and really helped to clarify things when studying at home and youdidn't get time to ask the tutor.tutor . William Wen is just the cutest thing ever!


94 The tutorials were smaller groups compared to other courses. TUT/T113, EXM/E101,LEC/L103, LAB/B104

95 I found Brock and Andrew explained things in a manner I could understand. Brock in particular broke things down reallywell.


Legend








Size/part: 837 / 40.3% (337)

96 Content was very clear in the lecture book and was easy to follow TUT/T113, EXM/E101,LAB/B105, LEC/L101

97 Brock grants videos were fantastic. TUT/T113, EXM/E101,LAB/B112, LEC/L101

98 The various online videos explaining how to work out various problems. I enjoyed William Wen's jokes, which kept a lot ofus engaged. Labs were interesting, and tutorials were supportive of the theory. I think this combination of classes workedtogether quite well.


99 - The abundance of tutorials & workshops was excellent in breaking down the course content & enhancing learning. TUT/T114, LAB/B113,LEC/L102, EXM/E101

100 The online tutorials done by Brock Grant, and the practice quizzes and modules like Biological Molecules that hadinteractive online components


101 It wasn't rushed TUT/T114, EXM/E101,LAB/B113, LEC/L102

102 The online video tutorials were fantastic additions to the teaching of the content. Occasionally the lectures felt disjointed,regularly losing structure and going back and forth between concepts. Whilst they were still taught effectively, it could besomething to consider improving in the future Practical aspects were a tad unexciting, but directions from lab tutors wereclear and concise.


103 All lecturers and tutors are excellent. TUT/T115, LEC/L101,LAB/B107, EXM/E101

104 The extensive variety and methods of help given to those struggling with the content. TUT/T115, LEC/L102,LAB/B101, EXM/E101

105 Good introduction for students without a background in those areas TUT/T115, LAB/B102,LEC/L101, EXM/E101

106 Brock's online tutorials TUT/T115, LAB/B110,LEC/L101, EXM/E101

107 This course was well organised and the assessment was completely transparent in its requirements. I personally feltinterested in many of the broad topics that were presented in the course, and the lectures provided a good ground forfurther learning.


108 William is funny TUT/T115, LAB/B110,LEC/L103, EXM/E101

109 The organisation of it all was very good. The physics part of the course was AMAZINGLY more interesting than theChemistry.


110 The tutors were very helpful, also the videos brock made for us were excellent TUT/T115, EXM/E101,LAB/B102, LEC/L101

111 a lot of support for this course from lecturers LAB/B101, LEC/L102,TUT/T103, EXM/E101

112 The help provided LAB/B101, LEC/L102,TUT/T107, EXM/E101

113 The extra online videos were very helpful which allowed me to gain a greater knowledge. LAB/B101, LEC/L102,EXM/E101, TUT/T108

114 Can I premise my next statements with telling you I have not done any maths (beyond calculating interest on my credit cardor mortgage) for over 20 years! Chemistry and Physics are incredibly difficult for me!! Yet every time I walked out of thelecture I thought, "yes, I've got that". Unfortunately I would quickly forget and hence watch Brock's videos over and overand over again. All staff in this subject are incredibly patient and helpful.

LAB/B103, TUT/T105,EXM/E101, LEC/L101

115 I found the tutors incredibly helpful and the online videos/tutorials by Brock and Andrew Pearson were great learningresources.

LAB/B103, EXM/E101,LEC/L102, TUT/T108

116 1001MSC facebook group was fantastic - q&a with both students and teachers LAB/B104, EXM/E101,LEC/L102, TUT/T103

117 william wen LAB/B104, EXM/E101,TUT/T105, LEC/L102

LAB/B104, EXM/E101,

Legend








Size/part: 837 / 40.3% (337)

118 Interesting content. TUT/T105, LEC/L103

119 How you use content from year 12, so it comes together. LAB/B105, LEC/L101,EXM/E101, TUT/T107

120 The organisation and flow of the lectures and material. Also the technological components of online videos. LAB/B105, LEC/L102,TUT/T108, EXM/E101

121 Nothing. I hate chemistry LAB/B105, LEC/L103,TUT/T111, EXM/E101

122 It's simplicity LAB/B105, LEC/L103,EXM/E101, TUT/T108

123 I studied chemistry and physics in Years 11 and 12, so I did not really learn anything new but this was a good reviewsubject.

LAB/B105, LEC/L103,EXM/E101, TUT/T109

124 Labs LAB/B105, TUT/T105,LEC/L102, EXM/E101

125 Learning new things LAB/B105, TUT/T105,LEC/L103, EXM/E101

126 Having the lecture notes available to purchase as a book was seriously fantastic! Saved so much time and money printingout lecture slides every week. Brock Grant video tutorials are amazing, very helping in explaining topics in language that iseasy to understand, sometimes the other teachers use big words and don't seem to remember what it's like to beginchemistry and not know the meanings for any big words.


127 Brock's online tutorials - to say that they helped me to understand the content would be an understatement. His time andenergy was invaluable to me.


128 No comment. LAB/B106, LEC/L101,EXM/E101, TUT/T108

129 I found the actual way we were taught the information and content was so good because I understood everything although Inormally find new information that we have to learn difficult.


130 andrew was very helpful when problems arise LAB/B106, EXM/E101,LEC/L103, TUT/T107

131 The 2 lecturers (Andrew and William) were very effective and interesting in the way they taught. It was easy to learn fromthem and approach them with any questions. I also like that they took the time to go over all (I think) of the assessment wedid. This was super beneficial. I also really appreciate the review Q sheets that they provide as revision material. I enjoyeddoing small pieces of assessment regularly rather than heaps of big ones, and we did that in chemistry (every 2nd labsession).


132 the tutorials this course offered really helped me to understand each topics LAB/B106, EXM/E101,TUT/T104, LEC/L102

133 I do feel that Andrew in particular went above and beyond in trying to get people to pass this course. I really have struggledwith it and wonder why I am doing it but do feel there was support. Brock Grants videos have been amazing and havereally complimented the course. He has worked tirelessly to get the videos to us on time. P. Madge in the labs and tutorialshas been fantastic too. He has stayed behind and gone through things for us.


134 It was an interesting course that focused on the basis of chemistry and physics. Was well done LAB/B111, LEC/L101,EXM/E101, TUT/T111

135 Content was delivered in an interesting way LAB/B111, LEC/L102,TUT/T103, EXM/E101

136 Constant quizzes and clear outline of what needed to be revised. LAB/B111, LEC/L102,EXM/E101, TUT/T114

137 Having prior knowledge of the information. LAB/B111, LEC/L102,EXM/E101, TUT/T114

138 the learning was straight forwrd LAB/B111, LEC/L103,TUT/T102, EXM/E101

139 The tutorials were a great way to ensure that I knew how to complete certain questions. Also the online tutorials were agreat help also.


LAB/B112, LEC/L101,

Legend








Size/part: 837 / 40.3% (337)

140 Chem EXM/E101, TUT/T107

141 The questions were all relative to the topics rather than out of the box. LAB/B112, LEC/L103,EXM/E101, TUT/T106

142 The range of topics, including both chemistry and physics. Also that it began with relatively basic chemistry to begin with torefresh

LAB/B112, TUT/T105,LEC/L101, EXM/E101

143 Brock Grant's videos and help. Without him I wouldn't have gotten a decent mark so far. LAB/B112, TUT/T105,LEC/L103, EXM/E101

144 the content organization was easy to follow and I was able to know which areas were assessable. LAB/B112, EXM/E101,LEC/L101, TUT/T111

145 Brock's videos and explanation's are the only reason I am passing this course so far. LAB/B112, EXM/E101,LEC/L102, TUT/T102

146 William Wen and Brock Grant LAB/B112, EXM/E101,TUT/T103, LEC/L101

147 The Physics component of the course was the most interesting for me and it was what i enjoyed the most. LAB/B115, TUT/T103,LEC/L101, EXM/E101

148 the relationship to real life scenarioa LAB/B115, TUT/T104,LEC/L103, EXM/E101

149 Tutors LAB/B115, EXM/E101,LEC/L103, TUT/T107

150 Great amount of additional resources such as the facebook group and Brock's videos which both really helped studentsengage with the course content.

EXM/E101, LEC/L101,TUT/T108, LAB/B114

151 made a bad subject a little more interesting EXM/E101, LEC/L101,TUT/T111, LAB/B106

152 Brock was one of chemistry tutors and he made a couple of video clips. I found it very useful. EXM/E101, LEC/L101,TUT/T111, LAB/B115

153 The lectures were very in depth and were very slow to ensure maximum understanding. The individual lectures were easyto understand content wise as it was taken at a good pace.


154 Lecture notes where well set out. EXM/E101, LEC/L101,TUT/T112, LAB/B106

155 some of the content tied in well with anatomy and physiology 1 and cells, tissues and regulation which made it interesting EXM/E101, LEC/L101,LAB/B103, TUT/T112

156 Good lecturers, very helpful people. Also the content was well taught, it's a hard subject to teach but the lecturers did agreat job (as well as Brock Grant!)

EXM/E101, LEC/L101,LAB/B103, TUT/T114

157 Tutorials and them giving us sample questions EXM/E101, LEC/L101,LAB/B108, TUT/T101

158 The fact that there were multiple assessment items so that if you stuffed up one, you could make up for it with anotherpiece.


159 Online videoa by brock grant and active staff participation on facebook EXM/E101, LEC/L101,LAB/B108, TUT/T114

160 The well informed lecturers and assisting academics were great. The use of Brock Grants Students Success programshould be used across all subjects as it is a great help and his work on it has had a tremendous impact.


161 Tutorials EXM/E101, LEC/L102,TUT/T107, LAB/B103

162 The lecturers were clear and helpful EXM/E101, LEC/L102,TUT/T107, LAB/B106

163 good online tutorials EXM/E101, LEC/L102,LAB/B101, TUT/T103

164 Everyone, the lecturers, tutors, lab tutors were all helpful. EXM/E101, LEC/L102,LAB/B101, TUT/T111

165 Its chemistry and physics. EXM/E101, LEC/L102,

Legend








Size/part: 837 / 40.3% (337)

LAB/B103, TUT/T111

166 resources EXM/E101, LEC/L102,LAB/B104, TUT/T114

167 it was very interesting and engaging in all aspects of class work. EXM/E101, LEC/L102,LAB/B107, TUT/T114

168 The teaching style was easy to follow and learn. EXM/E101, LEC/L102,LAB/B108, TUT/T107

169 The way that each section was divided up and that we were directed to the problems out of the textbook that we should becompleting.


170 Online Tutorials were a life saver! Brock's Online tutes helped me exponentially during the semester EXM/E101, LEC/L102,LAB/B109, TUT/T102

171 Brock's help, and the openness of the facebook group. Also the griffith customised textbook. EXM/E101, LEC/L102,LAB/B109, TUT/T107

172 The online tutorials and videos EXM/E101, LEC/L103,TUT/T102, LAB/B107

173 It was all presented in a very effective manor and made it easy to learn EXM/E101, LEC/L103,TUT/T103, LAB/B104

174 The people who lead the classes (lecturers and laboratory heads) were very good! EXM/E101, LEC/L103,TUT/T103, LAB/B108

175 The labs were well run and taught EXM/E101, LEC/L103,TUT/T103, LAB/B108

176 Brock's online tutorials helped a lot EXM/E101, LEC/L103,TUT/T108, LAB/B106

177 It covers all aspects of chemistry and physics in a short amount of time efficiently EXM/E101, LEC/L103,TUT/T109, LAB/B112

178 good intro, to get you started. pretty hard if you have never done chem or physics before EXM/E101, LEC/L103,TUT/T114, LAB/B111

179 Interesting content that can be understood by someone who hasn't done chemistry before. EXM/E101, LEC/L103,LAB/B104, TUT/T109

180 My best subject but somehow I gettingg horible marks :( EXM/E101, LEC/L103,LAB/B104, TUT/T109

181 The tutors were fantastic and very helpful when needed, the labs were very clearly set out and easy to follow, lecturecontent was well set out with all the necessary information


182 Easy to use lecture notes to revise. Lectures really well presented so I never got behind or felt confused. EXM/E101, LEC/L103,LAB/B104, TUT/T113

183 The support that the lectures and tutors provided was outstanding. It was always easy to approach them and ask for help. The tutorials were particularly helpful in consolidating the content and applying it to questions.


184 great course, just difficult EXM/E101, LEC/L103,LAB/B105, TUT/T113

185 I learnt most of the content at school, good for refreshing EXM/E101, LEC/L103,LAB/B107, TUT/T109

186 The online tutorials, and especially Brock's videos, were amazing! EXM/E101, LEC/L103,LAB/B108, TUT/T102

187 The videos by Brock Grant which provided a better understanding of the topics covered in the course EXM/E101, LEC/L103,LAB/B108, TUT/T112

188 The online tutorials , Brock's contributions were wonderful . The only way i've been able to do this course EXM/E101, LEC/L103,LAB/B108, TUT/T112

189 William Wen who made re-learning chemistry interesting along with Andrew EXM/E101, LEC/L103,LAB/B109, TUT/T107

190 The labs EXM/E101, LEC/L103,LAB/B115, TUT/T106

Legend








Size/part: 837 / 40.3% (337)

191 none EXM/E101, LEC/L103,LAB/B115, TUT/T115

192 There were lots of videos uploaded and the teachers were interesting EXM/E101, TUT/T102,LEC/L101, LAB/B107

193 the review questions and going over the assessment after being assessed. EXM/E101, TUT/T103,LEC/L101, LAB/B111

194 The lecturer (William Wen) is very good at teaching and makes the content clear and understandable. EXM/E101, TUT/T103,LEC/L101, LAB/B115

195 The lecture notes were extremely useful in following along and made it more convenient in revising as the different topicswere clearly separated. The revision lectures before the mid semester exam and course quiz were very beneficial intostudying for the pieces of assessment.

EXM/E101, TUT/T104,LEC/L101, LAB/B106

196 I found the information within this course to be very interesting. EXM/E101, TUT/T104,LEC/L101, LAB/B108

197 Content was explained clearly with practicle examples. EXM/E101, TUT/T104,LAB/B114, LEC/L101

198 All the online help from facebook and YouTube videos. Also liked the review questions and how much they helped with theexams.

EXM/E101, TUT/T104,LAB/B114, LEC/L103

199 The lecture notes made it easy to follow along. EXM/E101, TUT/T104,LAB/B114, LEC/L103

200 the availability of teaching staff in time of need, and the extra videos by Brock Grant EXM/E101, TUT/T105,LEC/L101, LAB/B105

201 the lecturers EXM/E101, TUT/T105,LEC/L101, LAB/B111

202 Lots of resources available, Brock's video were excellent as revision. Tutes were extremely helpful. Facebook group wasalso good.


203 Nothing I am disappointed. EXM/E101, TUT/T105,LEC/L102, LAB/B103

204 The content was thorough and it allowed those students who hadn't done chemistry previously to gain a completeunderstanding of the basics


205 i love dis stufffff EXM/E101, TUT/T105,LEC/L102, LAB/B105

206 Lecturers have real passion for what they teach EXM/E101, TUT/T105,LEC/L102, LAB/B107

207 Good foundation, EXM/E101, TUT/T105,LEC/L102, LAB/B108

208 I think the extra on line videos by Brock Grant are very helpful. I also found the lab tutor James Bone extremely helpful andmade my learning of this very difficult course easier. He is a credit to this course.


209 The use of engage students with images and interactive lessons with clear re-emphasis on key points EXM/E101, TUT/T111,LAB/B106, LEC/L101

210 The lecturers were great and were able to clearly communicate what was expected for each assessment piece as well asteach the content in an efficient, easy to understand way.

EXM/E101, LAB/B101,LEC/L102, TUT/T101

211 The tutorials, going through questions, using examples when presenting content in lectures, clear content, use ofresources- review questions and online videos for students


212 Interesting content EXM/E101, LAB/B101,LEC/L103, TUT/T102

213 I liked that it didn't feel like we rushed through and there were plenty of examples demonstrated how to apply the content.Also the lecturer was engaging and made it easy to follow what was being said.

EXM/E101, LAB/B103,TUT/T114, LEC/L101

214 the lecture is very knowledgeable EXM/E101, LAB/B109,LEC/L103, TUT/T111

EXM/E101, LAB/B109,

Legend








Size/part: 837 / 40.3% (337)

215 Many tutorial videos were available online which was accessible and easy to understand. LEC/L103, TUT/T115

216 The lecturers were helpful and supportive EXM/E101, LAB/B110,LEC/L101, TUT/T107

217 I like the lectures and the theory to this course. EXM/E101, LAB/B110,LEC/L101, TUT/T113

218 I quite enjoyed how this first semester has been kind of an overall recap for someone like me who has previously donechemistry in high school and refreshed my memory on certain theories that haven't come natural as opposed to learningthem in class.


219 Interesting content EXM/E101, LAB/B110,LEC/L102, TUT/T107

220 The lecturers were very thorough and explained the concepts clearly and succinctly. Additionally, the facebook group reallyhelped in the learning process as we could ask specific questions quickly and at any time.


221 Brock's online videos were particularly helpful and dr pearson's pre-lab video EXM/E101, LAB/B110,TUT/T115, LEC/L101

222 Everyone was so helpful and willing to listen EXM/E101, LAB/B111,LEC/L103, TUT/T103

223 Its well structured and explained well EXM/E101, LAB/B113,LEC/L102, TUT/T107

224 The highlight of this course was the lecturers. They made the course more enjoyable. EXM/E101, LAB/B113,TUT/T114, LEC/L101

225 There were a lot of resources to provided extra help to students. eg online videos EXM/E101, LAB/B114,LEC/L102, TUT/T114

226 The pracs were very engaging and provided a good hands on way of learning. EXM/E101, LAB/B114,LEC/L103, TUT/T103

227 It was particularly good in this course having a copy of the lecture notes as well as having example questions that we couldlook at in practice to gain assistance to make sure we were understanding everything before going on to complete weeklyexercises and before exam study.


Q8 How could this course be improved? Resp#: 203 / Class

1 It would have been great to see the equations demonstrated on the board, captured on lecture capture. LEC/L101, TUT/T103,EXM/E101, LAB/B112

2 I think it is doing the best it can do (considering the large number of students who are enrolled) LEC/L101, TUT/T104,EXM/E101, LAB/B109

3 delivery of content was hard to follow LEC/L101, TUT/T104,EXM/E101, LAB/B112

4 The tutor's and laboratory assistants could be more organised and have correct working out and answers for questions.Multiple times we were presented with incorrect answers or working out. Occasionally it seemed that the lab assistant wereno completely qualified to teach the material or to run a class. Answers and results to lab quiz's should be made availableonline for students to learn from their mistakes. I found that a lot of the lecture captures where not properly recorded. Someof them would show only the first 5 minutes of the lecture. Would be great if the lecture capture could also incorporate whatis being written on the white board during the lecture.


5 The range of content and prior knowledge is not in line with the cohort intake. As well many of the labs and tutorials werecut short not by the students but the tutors who seemed to just want to get out of there and really not overly interested inteaching first year health students. I find it perplexing when the failure rate of this course is almost tagged as anachievement which is deplorable and unnecessary. The mid-semester exam was a fair and equitable assessment whereasthe second course exam was not - being that a student was able to demonstrate their comprehension of the content in themid-semester through the use of long-answer responses which were marked individually, whereas the second courseexam was 10mc questions which for all intensive purposes, compared to the mid-semester much more heavy duty mathswise and yet this was via a mark sense card so regardless of whether you comprehended the content, if you didn'tcalculate the answer accurately you received no marks full-stop which therefore becomes more of a maths exam than achemistry content comprehension exam.


Legend








Size/part: 837 / 40.3% (337)

6 Tutorial at end of Lab doesn't work that well and found the actual tutorials, 1 hour not long enough to cover manyquestions.


7 less saturday exams LEC/L101, LAB/B113,EXM/E101, TUT/T114

8 In particular the mercury/pressure laboratory was quite shoddy in comparison to the others, it was less explained than theothers, and constituted most of my struggle with the course. Also, most of the course was the same as year 12 chemistry.Because of this, much of my engagement and enjoyment was lost.


9 Make labs appropriate time length didn't like sitting around for an hour waiting after all my stuff was done LEC/L101, LAB/B114,EXM/E101, TUT/T106

10 I had difficulty understanding the course content. The jump in difficulty from week 7 onwards was very difficult and made ithard to keep up with the content. The way the content was taught made it hard to understand.


11 It's already quite good. LEC/L101, EXM/E101,TUT/T105, LAB/B108

12 PASS CLASS !!!! More access for help with Tutors or other Teachers ! LEC/L101, EXM/E101,TUT/T106, LAB/B105

13 Not enough time in course quiz, mid semester exam. Not enough teaching time of physics LEC/L101, EXM/E101,TUT/T106, LAB/B112

14 The course is laid out well as it is. LEC/L101, EXM/E101,TUT/T108, LAB/B105

15 lecture captures white board writing LEC/L101, EXM/E101,TUT/T109, LAB/B105

16 it was pretty good LEC/L101, EXM/E101,LAB/B106, TUT/T102

17 Take it easy on students that have no experience with chemistry. Your killing me here. LEC/L101, EXM/E101,LAB/B106, TUT/T106

18 I did not benefit from the lectures at all. The content was covered way too quick and was not explained in a way that couldbe easily understood.


19 Not combing Chemistry with Physics, would give us more time to cover content more thoroughly LEC/L101, EXM/E101,LAB/B107, TUT/T111

20 1. By taking away the physics element, at least for those studying degrees to which physics is not relevant; 2. Creating aphysics bridging course so that those who have already studied organic chemistry can just do a short course to tick off thephysics component, without repeating the entire course again; or 3. Exempt students who have already completed organicchemistry from the lab work (except potentially the last one or two labs that relate to physics)


21 be more appealing LEC/L101, EXM/E101,LAB/B114, TUT/T106

22 Feedback provided on failed assessment LEC/L101, EXM/E101,LAB/B115, TUT/T106

23 Longer tutorial times instead of 50 minutes an hour and 50 minutes would be better even if it finished early - just so thatthere is more time to go over content and ask extra questions until you can fully understand the content

LEC/L102, EXM/E101,TUT/T104, LAB/B113

24 Maybe creating a PASS session, to help those who didn't do chemistry and physics as subjects at school TUT/T101, LEC/L102,EXM/E101, LAB/B103

25 Not entirely sure because I have learnt chemistry before, but based on the speed and vagueness of details, I wouldimagine that this course would be very challenging for students who haven't done chemistry before. Perhaps a widerselection of questions to help us further understand our knowledge would be helpful.


26 If PASS was available I would have attended. TUT/T101, EXM/E101,LEC/L101, LAB/B108

27 Make concepts more clear so they able to be better understood. TUT/T101, EXM/E101,LEC/L102, LAB/B106

28 I can't think of any improvements TUT/T101, EXM/E101,LEC/L102, LAB/B107

Legend








Size/part: 837 / 40.3% (337)

29 nothing TUT/T101, EXM/E101,LEC/L103, LAB/B104

30 Labs are very poorly run. Perhaps more experienced/knowledgable instructors and more of them would be beneficial. TUT/T101, EXM/E101,LAB/B101, LEC/L101

31 By working out more problems during lecture . TUT/T102, LAB/B110,EXM/E101, LEC/L102


33 not very thrilling content, once you fall behind, you stay behind, difficult to catch up. TUT/T102, LAB/B113,LEC/L102, EXM/E101

34 Some of the student tutors for the labs weren't that confident and weren't that easy to understand when they tried to explainexperiments and calculations to us.


35 more help with problem solvng questions TUT/T103, LAB/B114,EXM/E101, LEC/L102

36 please arrange pass for this subject because sometime some topics are difficult to understand and tutorial are not enoughfor students. so please arrange pass.


37 Not have the end of semester exam include all 12 topics covered in the semester; just the ones after mid-semesters. Alsoinclude the white-board workings in lecture capture.


38 Better tutorial sessions TUT/T106, LEC/L102,EXM/E101, LAB/B114

39 More revision sheets identical to the level of difficulty being assessed in the exam for better preparation. TUT/T106, LEC/L102,EXM/E101, LAB/B114

40 Some more challenging and more medically relevant content could be included TUT/T106, LEC/L102,EXM/E101, LAB/B115

41 N/A TUT/T106, LEC/L103,EXM/E101, LAB/B115

42 I feel because the course covered so much in so little time, it moved too fast in some area and too slow in others. Forexample, less time should have been spent on the introduction/basics into chemistry (elements etc) and more time on moredifficult concepts such as Redox later into the semester. Those who had not done chemistry in high school may strugglewith these more advanced concepts and should be given more time. Probably not directly related to problems of the courseso to speak but this was too easy content wise for those who had taken physics and chemistry in high school...


43 Tutorials are messy- only time to go through a couple of questions. Would be good to have answers/ working- leaving timein tuts to go over concepts


44 make it more interesting TUT/T106, LAB/B111,EXM/E101, LEC/L103


46 I think it would have been helpful if all lectures were captured and William did his workings on the screen as opposed to theboard for the purposes of re-watching lectures to understand concepts.


47 Clearer explanations of key concepts (old and new) TUT/T107, LEC/L102,EXM/E101, LAB/B104

48 Less math TUT/T107, EXM/E101,LAB/B113, LEC/L102

49 Lab Tutors need improving! Multiple times in labs, the tutors were difficult to understand. Not very well at explaining topicsand in most instances confused me more. E.g in the labs would try and do a question from the lab manual and would getthe answer wrong, thus further confusing me. Also the labs tutorials were rushed as people wanted to get home. Maybemake the tutorials compulsory? However some tutors were ok. Majority i found hard to learn from. Lab manual questionswith working and answers would be a useful resource.


50 Teach all tutors in labs and tutorial the same method of doing things. As well as do some questions from textbook in thelecture as we are learning the content.


Legend








Size/part: 837 / 40.3% (337)

51 have harder examples in the lecture notes so that when we come to the weekly exercises they are not as foreign TUT/T108, LAB/B110,EXM/E101, LEC/L101

52 More online videos working through exam type questions. TUT/T108, EXM/E101,LAB/B109, LEC/L101

53 more interesting labs TUT/T109, LEC/L102,LAB/B104, EXM/E101

54 lab guide questions more suited to what me need to know TUT/T109, EXM/E101,LEC/L103, LAB/B104

55 I didn't go to tutes because i found them very overcrowded when i did go. Less people in the class would have been muchbetter. I didn't enjoy the physics section. I found the content in the lecture notes wasn't particularly clear. I feel that thelecture notes could benefit from a formula sheet at the end of each topic or a learning objectives page so you can reallyunderstand what exactly you need to know. It would make the lecture notes clearer.


56 More engaging activities in labs, it felt like a waste of time coming in for the 3 hours when we were only doing such basictasks that could have been read and understood out of a textbook instead of doing them.


57 more convenient tutorial times. It's difficult for me to attend the online tutorial because of the time as I am not as local as anumber of the other students


58 Dr. William Wen I found was hard to understand, quite hard to follow and didn't present the content in an engaging way. Ihave a background in chemistry and the way the concepts were presented made it very confusing I found it was better notto attend the lectures and learn the content on my own. I did not find the tutorial sessions helpful either, they were setup ina way that you took the tutorial questions you had difficulty with and asked them to show you how to do it, this became abad idea as majority of the class (all expect two) didn't bring any questions with them evidently causing the class to finishearly on a regular basis and it being a waste of time. Maybe a PASS session or an engaging tutorial session with morepractice questions would be more suitable.


59 It would be great, if tutors (not lab tutors, but normal tutors) are consistently organised and more time effective. Some areexcellent, but some of them sometimes didn't seem to be keen to teach, or talk about something else and run out of time tocover the important content of the week.


60 I think the lectures could definitely be improved, as a lot of the time I would feel they were pointless as it was essentiallyreading things out of the lecture notes etc. They also were very full of revision and I found that this took up a lot of time thatcould have been used to learn or study other things.


61 It would be helpful if the lecture capture could somehow record that which was written on the whiteboard. TUT/T111, EXM/E101,LEC/L102, LAB/B102

62 Making lectures more structured and clear to follow TUT/T111, EXM/E101,LEC/L103, LAB/B107

63 Make physics a separate course or make it more relevant to health since this course is a part of the School of MedicalScience. Lab tutors weren't always the most helpful in explaining answers to questions.


64 I loved Andrew's video with answers he did before last lab test, and I wished if we can have such version for weeklyexercise as well. I also liked him using over head projector to work out answers for questions, so it is lecture captured.


65 Labs need to be much better. My lab (Monday 5-7pm) instructors did not provide clear instruction or explanation. Two ofthe three mumbled and I often struggled to follow their thought process. They also made little effort to write lab/tutequestion responses (on the white board) legibly and often skipped several steps without clear explanation of why.


66 By having lab demonstrators who firstly explained what we were about to do in that weeks lab, who would go throughdifficult concepts, and not confuse us (the students) even more when they would go through the lab questions only todiscover, that they were doing the calculations wrong. Some weeks the lab demonstrators wouldn't even do the labquestions, they said "you can do them in your own time". Having to leave the lab rooms, to go to a different room oncampus, in order to do the lab quizzes, was frustrating at the least.The lab demonstrators were unorganised, and moststudents in my lab felt the same frustrations with how they explained concepts. I think the labs we did in this course werepointless, I feel like I have taken nothing away from this subject, and its not because I haven't tried to enjoy the subject. Ithink having an end of semester exam worth 55% of the course grade put far too much pressure on students.


67 Better more interesting labs. TUT/T112, EXM/E101,LEC/L103, LAB/B108

68 I wish we had PASS TUT/T112, EXM/E101,LEC/L103, LAB/B109

Legend








Size/part: 837 / 40.3% (337)

69 I found it hard to understand a lecturer who doesn't speak english very well, whilst great at teaching, I struggle tocomprehend what was said, so I end up coming to lectures less and less because there was no use in me being there andnot following along because I couldn't understand. I found that I needed to teach myself a lot of things and do it on my ownto achieve better results.


70 this course should be mandatory only for people with no chemistry or physics background TUT/T113, LEC/L102,LAB/B114, EXM/E101

71 Nothing I could suggest TUT/T113, LEC/L103,LAB/B102, EXM/E101

72 Availability of more review tutorials/questions/materials TUT/T113, LEC/L103,EXM/E101, LAB/B105

73 MORE WILLIAM WEN TUT/T113, LEC/L103,EXM/E101, LAB/B105

74 More time on physics TUT/T113, LEC/L103,EXM/E101, LAB/B112

75 can't really make chemistry more interesting TUT/T113, LEC/L103,EXM/E101, LAB/B112

76 Clearer explanation of the content- in relation to the practice and exam questions TUT/T113, LAB/B110,EXM/E101, LEC/L103

77 Make Brock Grant a lecturer/ tutorer/lab man Have different times for tutorials (not 8am and 6pm) TUT/T113, LAB/B111,EXM/E101, LEC/L103

78 There was a huge difference between the difficulty of questions taught in lectures and those in exams. I think the level atwhich the content is taught needs to be more in sync with the level of which the content is tested. Also I didn't find goingthrough the exams/quizes in lectures very helpful, it wastes a whole hour in which we can actually be taught how to do thequestions rather than quickly going through the answers.


79 More emphasis on the tutorial after the laboratory. Maybe even have it before hand to finish off the work from the previousweek so we can ask questions.


80 The labs are boring as h***, and the tutors weren't very helpful in the labs. TUT/T113, EXM/E101,LEC/L103, LAB/B104

81 Some of the labs were on content we hadn't covered yet, making it hard for some students TUT/T113, EXM/E101,LEC/L103, LAB/B104

82 More revision. TUT/T113, EXM/E101,LEC/L103, LAB/B104

83 The course content moved too quickly for me to follow (not having any prior knowledge of Chemistry. It took me the wholesemester to understand William Wens accent and style of teaching. I was really confused prior to this. There was also notenough teachers to assist all the students. Tutorials were always really full, in Labs the teachers either were not able toanswer questions properly or there were not enough to help everyone.


84 Get tutors for the labs who actually know the content of the labs. My class struggled with the lab content every now andthen because the tutors often did not know how to answer the lab questions in the lab manual. Also, make available onlinenot just answers but working out on all the questions that the students have to do from textbook 1 and textbook 2 as well astowards the end of the lecture book where there are questions. Working out helps us follow the steps we should be doing toachieve the right answer! This would be a huge help!!


85 Less writing on the white board for recorded lectures as these are not visible from home. TUT/T113, EXM/E101,LAB/B112, LEC/L101

86 Often, when I listen to lecture capture I am lost, because I have only William Wen's voice to understand the content, as heuses the whiteboard to illustrate his points during lectures, which are not recorded on lecture capture. If somehow, bothparts could be integrated, it would be easier to learn and revise content. Sometimes, I got lost finding what content I wassupposed to learn for each exam.


87 - Lecture capture could incorporate white-board working, if possible. TUT/T114, LAB/B113,LEC/L102, EXM/E101

88 The level of questions we are supposed to attempt on our own after lectures and laboratories are really difficult, so I getdisheartened, then on the quizzes and exams the questions are of a quite reasonable level that I would have been fine withif I had some more practice questions of that level.


Legend








Size/part: 837 / 40.3% (337)

89 Labs should cover the content from the lectures at the same time, tutorials (more explaining the questions rather than justwriting down the answers)


90 Better organisation of content. Sometimes lecturers lessons do not actually reflect the slides delivered. TUT/T114, EXM/E101,LAB/B113, LEC/L102

91 easier assessment for students straight out of school, it is a bit daunting. TUT/T115, LEC/L101,LAB/B107, EXM/E101

92 The lecture capture is sub-par and seems to have some issues. TUT/T115, LEC/L102,LAB/B101, EXM/E101

93 better ways of explaining things TUT/T115, LEC/L102,EXM/E101, LAB/B106

94 Bit mundane for students who already have a background in these subjects TUT/T115, LAB/B102,LEC/L101, EXM/E101

95 Not sure TUT/T115, LAB/B110,LEC/L101, EXM/E101

96 More real life examples and diagrams relating the course content to the medical field would be a good addition to thelectures.


97 Give harder content in lectures so there better preparation for exam TUT/T115, LAB/B110,LEC/L103, EXM/E101

98 More Physics TUT/T115, EXM/E101,LAB/B101, LEC/L102

99 The lectures and the content expected to know beyond the lectures was too high. TUT/T115, EXM/E101,LAB/B102, LEC/L101

100 n/a LAB/B101, LEC/L102,TUT/T103, EXM/E101

101 Either more time to learn basic chemistry - lots of us have no chemistry background and had difficulty following the contentat the beginning

LAB/B101, LEC/L102,TUT/T107, EXM/E101

102 Tutorials explain topics more rather then just answering questions throughout the textbook. Much preferred Brock's onlinetutorials


103 A math summary of re-arranging. I would have loved to have done the math catch-up prior starting but we got very littlenotice and for those of us who are not post school with a flexible/free timetable it was an impossibility. If there were eveningmath tutes or something alike that could help those students with poor math skills, I feel there would be a greater feeling ofunderstanding.


104 Lecture notes reviewed for typos LAB/B103, TUT/T105,EXM/E101, LEC/L102

105 Lecture was mainly presented using the whiteboard so it was hard when I couldn't attend the lecture to lecture capture itbecause I couldn't see what he was doing.


106 The lectures were difficult to focus and stay attentive in. LAB/B103, EXM/E101,LEC/L102, TUT/T108

107 go into more detail about things that are confusing LAB/B104, EXM/E101,TUT/T105, LEC/L102

108 More links to the other health courses so the information seems more relevant. Also more interesting delivery of topics. LAB/B104, EXM/E101,TUT/T105, LEC/L103

109 Not going into overly extensive detail (some detail is fine) that is unrelated and not tested. This was the case for biologicalmolecules.


110 N/A LAB/B105, LEC/L102,TUT/T108, EXM/E101

111 I do not understand how calculating how many joules it takes to melt a block of ice, how long it will take a bear to catch arunning camper, how many litres of water it will take to fill a fish tank 3 feet by 1 foot e.t.c will help me as a healthprofessional. A complete waste of time.


112 Engage the students who have already done year 12 chemistry by teaching them new things LAB/B105, LEC/L103,

Legend








Size/part: 837 / 40.3% (337)

EXM/E101, TUT/T108

113 I don't really understand why we covered biological molecules as we were only assessed in 1-2 questions on this entiretopic. I feel that because we jumped from basic chemistry, to biological molecules, and then back again, it felt disjointed. Also, perhaps more questions should be included in assessment so as to decrease the weighting of each question (if youget one question wrong, it can decrease your overall mark significantly). Although I studied Chemistry and Physics in years11 and 12, and therefore understood all of the content, I feel that the delivery and structure of the course may be confusingfor some students new to these concepts. The laboratory component in this course was not very interesting. Most of theexperiments were quite boring compared to labs from school. Perhaps this could be changed. The tutors and lab tutorscould perhaps undergo more training in TEACHING - most of the time, they know the content very well. However,conveying this information to students was at some times a little confusing. I also find it very annoying how students areallowed to leave during exams, quizzes and lab quizzes (even though I was under the impression people were not allowedto leave during lab quizzes). It is very distracting to have invigilators constantly rushing around collecting papers, and thenstudents getting up and leaving - it makes a lot of noise and can affect other student's train of thought. It would be muchbetter to make all students stay for the duration of all assessment (including exams - 2-3 hours it is not that long).


114 this course could be improved if there was a pass LAB/B105, TUT/T105,LEC/L103, EXM/E101

115 Pass sessions for chemistry would be beneficial. Also would be good if echo capture was able to actually capture what theteachers write on the white board. Some of us have to work to pay for mortgages and can't attend every lecture and shouldnot be penalized for watching lectures at home instead of physically attending uni.


116 I felt as though some of the tutors were not particularly clear when explaining things, this often left me confused, andworried that if I asked for help, I would be left more confused.


117 No comment. LAB/B106, LEC/L101,EXM/E101, TUT/T108

118 I believe that if the labs were more engaging and actually were a lot more beneficial and actually taught us a lot more fromthe applied knowledge then the course would be very good.


119 the lecturer need to explain how he works out equations step by step not skip things and just write it on board- eg william LAB/B106, EXM/E101,LEC/L103, TUT/T107

120 having chem as one subject shouldnt have to be completed just because you havent done physics LAB/B107, TUT/T105,EXM/E101, LEC/L103

121 It's very heavy in content and I did feel it a bit rushed but again Andrew Pearson really worked very hard in trying to get usall to pass.


122 Questions be improved for physics for example thus making them more engaging. Make physics fun. Currently, it's not andit's straight forward as ever.


123 Better explanation of content rather than enforce assumed knowledge on students LAB/B111, LEC/L102,EXM/E101, TUT/T114

124 Easier to understand, not rushing through information as others did't understand topics LAB/B111, LEC/L102,EXM/E101, TUT/T114

125 the tutorials could be organised better LAB/B111, LEC/L103,TUT/T102, EXM/E101

126 Due to mutiple lecture streams it was difficult to find the lecture that you wanted to relisten to on echo. Also they weren'tnamed and my lecture stream never was the one recorded so it was even harder to find. Would be good to name thelectures on echo


127 As of now I do not see any improvements that need to be made to this course. LAB/B112, LEC/L103,EXM/E101, TUT/T106

128 PASS would help some students a lot. LAB/B112, TUT/T105,LEC/L103, EXM/E101

129 no improvements needed LAB/B112, EXM/E101,LEC/L101, TUT/T111

130 The lab schedule is ridiculous. It is poorly designed to have practical exercises before any content is covered leading tostudent confusion. I also found methods of how things were taught inconsistent which makes it quite difficult for someonelike me who has never done any science before. Also it was very difficult to follow on lecture capture when my scheduledoubled up as everything is done on the board.


Legend








Size/part: 837 / 40.3% (337)

131 The lab sessions are not that interesting, I found some of them quite boring especially the ones where we made saltsolutions and measured water in a measuring cylinder.


132 Elaboration in lectures LAB/B115, EXM/E101,LEC/L103, TUT/T107

133 The tutes (not including Andrews) could be better organized. - encourage participation more, The Lab tutors were average,some were okay. others were not. compared to other courses they were not as engaging, and some didnt know how toexplain the content in a clear concise way.


134 the lab quiz in week 13 could be swapped to a different week as that week is generally very hectic and overwhelming forsome students. The examples within the lecture notes could of explained some of the harder content as i found theexamples in the lecture notes did not match the level of difficulty to the textbook/assessments.


135 The lecturer, Dr. Wen should allow enough time for students to ask questions at the end of his lecture. He is alwaysimpatient, in turn lowering the quality of education.


136 The organisation of the course and the way the lecture content jumped around from week to week was quite disorientating.Also sometimes the lectures focused on the easier details and the harder parts were skimmed over.


137 reduce the laboratory and the course content to hard for some students who have not done chemistry and physics EXM/E101, LEC/L101,TUT/T112, LAB/B106

138 More practice questions with more variety in the questions. EXM/E101, LEC/L101,TUT/T112, LAB/B106

139 content was really geared towards people with previous background in chemistry, more background and basics would havebeen useful before harder content, in laboratories tutors would have better spent time explaining concepts to the wholegroup instead of everyone struggling with the same concept/idea and few tutors having to go to each individual group andsort out problems


140 I found that the tutors were bad at teaching, I stopped going to mine and started going to Andrew's tutorials instead. Noother subject has students teaching other students, and whilst this is good for the PhD students, they weren't as good atteaching as qualified teachers.


141 If the white board can be recorded as well and not just the screen on echo centre EXM/E101, LEC/L101,LAB/B108, TUT/T101

142 Have the lecture capture record the content displayed on the whiteboard please! EXM/E101, LEC/L101,LAB/B108, TUT/T111

143 Less labsw EXM/E101, LEC/L101,LAB/B108, TUT/T114

144 if its possible to receive more constructive feedback on results and assessment, it would help greatly. EXM/E101, LEC/L102,TUT/T103, LAB/B107

145 This course is a bit of a waste for someone who did high school chemistry and physics, so maybe credits could be given tostudents who achieve certain grades in high school chemistry or physics. Just repeated too much easy content we did inschool More advance labs, a bit boring just doing simple stuff like measuring volume or weight of a beaker etc.


146 By going through more worked exercises in the lectures EXM/E101, LEC/L102,TUT/T107, LAB/B106

147 more brock grant tutorials EXM/E101, LEC/L102,LAB/B101, TUT/T103

148 its a good course. EXM/E101, LEC/L102,LAB/B103, TUT/T111

149 make exams not so heavily weighted and with a small number of questions (eg. an exam where itsworth 10% but has only10 questions, a small mistake could cost you 1 %)


150 it can't be, its great EXM/E101, LEC/L102,LAB/B107, TUT/T114

151 Implementing more worksheets or practice questions to work on so that I am prepared for the exam. EXM/E101, LEC/L102,LAB/B108, TUT/T107

152 Lecture capture the working out on the whiteboard as well as the screen. EXM/E101, LEC/L102,LAB/B109, TUT/T102

Legend








Size/part: 837 / 40.3% (337)

153 Perhaps, more hours a week for less crammed physics component. EXM/E101, LEC/L102,LAB/B109, TUT/T107

154 More active interactive sections to the course EXM/E101, LEC/L103,TUT/T103, LAB/B104

155 I think the laboratories could use the full amount of time allotted better - I found that every week I finished the assignedtasks after half an hour or an hour.


156 The lectures could be run at a faster pace. He spent a lot of time going over small concepts EXM/E101, LEC/L103,TUT/T103, LAB/B108

157 More lecture capture interaction because most of the work is done on the board and we cant understand when we lecturecapture


158 The lecture capture for this course should be recorded better. During study week I was unable to go back and watchlectures because the lectures weren't recorded. Very disappointing


159 Bit slower, not so much cramming during lectures. More confident tutors during tutorials. EXM/E101, LEC/L103,TUT/T114, LAB/B111

160 go to high school before hand EXM/E101, LEC/L103,LAB/B104, TUT/T107

161 1) The amount of waiting around time that occurs in lectures is ridiculous and I know I'm not the only person to have thisview. A typical 2 hour lecture starts, on average, 7 minutes late, broken in the middle by a 15-25 minute break. On a badday thats an extra 32 minutes sitting in the lecture theatre doing nothing, time that could be well spent elsewhere. Iunderstand this is a first year course but its a little over the top. For me, I have commitments outside Uni, as I'm sure mostpeople do, and often find myself having to leave this lecture early to be punctual to those commitments which is highlyannoying when you've just spent 25-30 minutes sitting in a lecture theatre doing nothing. The lecture should start on time,and have a 5-10 minute break like most other lectures. It feels like the lecture is being dragged out just so that it fills thewhole 2 hours rather than there being 2 hours worth of content. 2) Talking of other students in the lectures is highlyannoying when you are trying to learn the content. The large amount of school leavers sit there chatting the whole waythrough. More needs to be done about teaching them to shut-up..they are not in high school anymore.


162 Nothing subject = legennd EXM/E101, LEC/L103,LAB/B104, TUT/T109

163 Don't believe there is anything that really needs to be improved EXM/E101, LEC/L103,LAB/B104, TUT/T109

164 More tutorials would be fantastic. Needs to be a greater emphasis on answering the questions rather than content. EXM/E101, LEC/L103,LAB/B104, TUT/T113

165 Condense content more or make the lectures shorter, a lot of time wasted in class due to big breaks! -->some as long as25 mins!!!!!


166 More explanation , slower pace . EXM/E101, LEC/L103,LAB/B108, TUT/T112

167 Making the labs more interesting not just dissolving salt in water. EXM/E101, LEC/L103,LAB/B109, TUT/T107

168 Pass lessons EXM/E101, LEC/L103,LAB/B115, TUT/T106

169 none EXM/E101, LEC/L103,LAB/B115, TUT/T115

170 If assessment was given feedback (note form, email, talking about it) as there was a Quiz i completed and I did not receivea satisfactory mark and still do not know where I went wrong.


171 the theory to be a little bit more interacting and having this mid sem exam on the same day as the other subject wasoverwhelming.


172 The course is well set out but one key area to improve on is in the labs, have the lab demonstrators go more into depthwith the focus of the lab (the theory part before heading into the experiment) as some labs, i felt like i didn't reallyunderstand what we were doing even though i had already asked a lab demonstrator.


173 The teaching staff could provide more feedback on our assessment. EXM/E101, TUT/T104,LEC/L101, LAB/B108

Legend








Size/part: 837 / 40.3% (337)

174 The late evening chemistry lab with the assessment in the tutorials that same evening very difficult. It would have beenbetter to do the assessment tasks first then the lab after.


175 Instead of just providing answers, proving working out would be helpful as the questions require a lot of working out andwant to see where i went wrong.


176 More options for tutorials, and feedback on exams. More emphasis on helping students who have not done chemistrybefore.


177 more video style lectures and online tutorials. I found the tutorials to be too fast with limited time and the groups too large toask specific questions. The lab tutorial staff were not good at their job, they could not explain concepts - very frustrating(thank goodness for you tube). More time for exams. The time allowed is ok for people who are quick at the concepts, butnot for those who need to slowly digest the problems presented and go through maths. The last lab quiz is not fair andequitable with concepts being taught and then tested straight away. Maybe the lectures could be presented online and the3 hour lecture becomes tutorials where students work through the problems together with an academic present to assist asneed be.


178 have answers to text book 2 EXM/E101, TUT/T105,LEC/L101, LAB/B111

179 I felt quiz 13 was very rushed and did not felt prepared compared to quiz 3 and 5. More time should be spent on thephysics section as that was more difficult than chemistry. More revision lessons on physics would be excellent


180 The instructors expect you to know chem and physics before you take it the text books are horrible and I might as well bewasting my money and time because the only resources that helped me were paying for tutors or teaching myself.


181 The content is quite long and drilling perhaps breaking it up with in class experiments or Pracs or even visuals may help EXM/E101, TUT/T105,LEC/L102, LAB/B104

182 more willy wen EXM/E101, TUT/T105,LEC/L102, LAB/B105

183 Labs after the content is taught in the lectures, not before EXM/E101, TUT/T105,LEC/L102, LAB/B107

184 The lecturers teach the course as if it is only revision, quickly skimming over each topic as if all students have learnt itbefore. This could be improved


185 Nothing really EXM/E101, TUT/T105,LEC/L102, LAB/B108

186 Possibly more classes run by Mr Pearson as he simplifies extensive work well EXM/E101, TUT/T111,LAB/B106, LEC/L101

187 occasionally summarize the lecture at the end, and going through some concepts slower. EXM/E101, LAB/B101,LEC/L102, TUT/T114

188 Explanations EXM/E101, LAB/B101,LEC/L103, TUT/T102

189 . EXM/E101, LAB/B103,TUT/T114, LEC/L101

190 I am very satisfied with what it is now EXM/E101, LAB/B109,LEC/L103, TUT/T111

191 The course could have been organise better. I found that some harder topics were mixed with easier ones so the layoutwas slightly difficult to follow with. For example, stoichiometry was much later in the course than electron orbitals etc. but Ifeel calculations/ easier parts should have been at the beginning.


192 add a PASS class EXM/E101, LAB/B110,LEC/L101, TUT/T107

193 I thought that the theory we learnt wasn't all very relevant when we only really do calculations in the exams. I wish therewas more time spent on the calculations in lectures instead of the theory which we hardly get assessed on. I also felt thelabs to be quite boring and irrelevant to the course content.


194 For this course to be improved i feel as though if more time was spent on step by step break downs of more HD stylequestions that will be assessed, as thats what i am finding most difficult to grasp at the moment.


195 The organisation of content and more cohesion with lecturing EXM/E101, LAB/B110,

Legend








Size/part: 837 / 40.3% (337)

LEC/L102, TUT/T107

196 Maintaining the current management. EXM/E101, LAB/B110,TUT/T103, LEC/L101

197 The lecture capture was not recorded for many sessions making study and catch ups VERY difficult. Also I'd rather theworking out be drawn for lecture capture then on the white board


198 More organisation. EXM/E101, LAB/B111,LEC/L102, TUT/T106

199 take more time at explaining in the lectures for equations, it can be hard for people who haven't studied this subject before. EXM/E101, LAB/B111,LEC/L103, TUT/T103

200 I found it difficult that the examinations for this course all seemed to be purely mathematic. I think more theory basedconcepts should've been examined. I also didn't enjoy the labs for this course. They were not very engaging.


201 Make the lectures more interactive. EXM/E101, LAB/B114,LEC/L102, TUT/T114

202 A lot of stuff was covered very quickly and at times I found it hard to keep up. EXM/E101, LAB/B114,LEC/L103, TUT/T103

203 N/A EXM/E101, LAB/B115,TUT/T106, LEC/L101

Legend







Class(es): EXM/E101 Size/part: 837 / 40.3% (337)


Question

#

Score


%+ve%-ve

Median

Stddev

Mean

QuartileBandRank

Comparativemean

25% 50% 75%


10816943104

SAAND

SD

32.3%50.6%

12.9%3%1.2%

32.6%48.3%

12.8%4.9%

1.4%

+82.9-4.2

4 0.82 4.1 3.8 4.0 4.3 3


12016037161

SAAND

SD

35.9%47.9%

11.1%4.8%

0.3%

30.7%46%

14.7%6.4%

2.1%

+83.8-5.1

4 0.82 4.1 3.7 4.0 4.2 3


63110121345

SAAND

SD

18.9%33%36.3%

10.2%1.5%

23.4%36.5%

29.3%8.2%

2.7%

+51.9-11.7

4 0.96 3.6 3.5 3.7 3.9 2


7413880375

SAAND

SD

22.2%41.3%

24%11.1%

1.5%

30.1%41.9%

18%7.4%

2.6%

+63.5-12.6

4 0.98 3.7 3.7 3.9 4.2 2


12213950157

SAAND

SD

36.6%41.7%

15%4.5%2.1%

34.7%42.8%

15.1%5.4%2.1%

+78.3-6.6

4 0.94 4.1 3.8 4.0 4.3 3


8717650163

SAAND

SD

26.2%53%

15.1%4.8%

0.9%

28.9%47.3%

16%5.6%

2.1%

+79.2-5.7

4 0.83 4.0 3.7 3.9 4.2 3

Legend







Class(es): LAB/B101 Size/part: 52 / 36.5% (19)


Question

#

Score


%+ve%-ve

Median

Stddev

Mean

QuartileBandRank

Comparativemean

25% 50% 75%


411220

SAAND

SD

21.1%57.9%

10.5%10.5%

0%

32.6%48.3%

12.8%4.9%

1.4%

+79-10.5

4 0.88 3.9 3.8 4.0 4.3 2


610300

SAAND

SD

31.6%52.6%

15.8%0%0%

30.7%46%

14.7%6.4%

2.1%

+84.2-0

4 0.69 4.2 3.7 4.0 4.2 4


26730

SAAND

SD

11.1%33.3%38.9%

16.7%0%

23.4%36.5%

29.3%8.2%

2.7%

+44.4-16.7

3 0.92 3.4 3.5 3.7 3.9 1


310420

SAAND

SD

15.8%52.6%

21.1%10.5%

0%

30.1%41.9%

18%7.4%

2.6%

+68.4-10.5

4 0.87 3.7 3.7 3.9 4.2 2


97300

SAAND

SD

47.4%36.8%

15.8%0%0%

34.7%42.8%

15.1%5.4%2.1%

+84.2-0

4 0.75 4.3 3.8 4.0 4.3 4


511300

SAAND

SD

26.3%57.9%

15.8%0%0%

28.9%47.3%

16%5.6%

2.1%

+84.2-0

4 0.66 4.1 3.7 3.9 4.2 3

Legend









Question

#

Score


%+ve%-ve

Median

Stddev

Mean

QuartileBandRank

Comparativemean

25% 50% 75%


77211

SAAND

SD

38.9%38.9%

11.1%5.6%5.6%

32.6%48.3%

12.8%4.9%

1.4%

+77.8-11.2

4 1.14 4.0 3.8 4.0 4.3 3


86310

SAAND

SD

44.4%33.3%

16.7%5.6%

0%

30.7%46%

14.7%6.4%

2.1%

+77.7-5.6

4 0.92 4.2 3.7 4.0 4.2 4


51930

SAAND

SD

27.8%5.6%

50%16.7%

0%

23.4%36.5%

29.3%8.2%

2.7%

+33.4-16.7

3 1.10 3.4 3.5 3.7 3.9 1


65340

SAAND

SD

33.3%27.8%

16.7%22.2%

0%

30.1%41.9%

18%7.4%

2.6%

+61.1-22.2

4 1.18 3.7 3.7 3.9 4.2 2


76212

SAAND

SD

38.9%33.3%

11.1%5.6%11.1%

34.7%42.8%

15.1%5.4%2.1%

+72.2-16.7

4 1.34 3.8 3.8 4.0 4.3 2


57150

SAAND

SD

27.8%38.9%

5.6%27.8%

0%

28.9%47.3%

16%5.6%

2.1%

+66.7-27.8

4 1.19 3.7 3.7 3.9 4.2 2

Legend









Question

#

Score


%+ve%-ve

Median

Stddev

Mean

QuartileBandRank

Comparativemean

25% 50% 75%


118301

SAAND

SD

47.8%34.8%

13%0%4.3%

32.6%48.3%

12.8%4.9%

1.4%

+82.6-4.3

4 1.00 4.2 3.8 4.0 4.3 3


117230

SAAND

SD

47.8%30.4%

8.7%13%

0%

30.7%46%

14.7%6.4%

2.1%

+78.2-13

4 1.06 4.1 3.7 4.0 4.2 3


311621

SAAND

SD

13%47.8%

26.1%8.7%

4.3%

23.4%36.5%

29.3%8.2%

2.7%

+60.8-13

4 0.99 3.6 3.5 3.7 3.9 2


412610

SAAND

SD

17.4%52.2%

26.1%4.3%

0%

30.1%41.9%

18%7.4%

2.6%

+69.6-4.3

4 0.78 3.8 3.7 3.9 4.2 2


812201

SAAND

SD

34.8%52.2%

8.7%0%4.3%

34.7%42.8%

15.1%5.4%2.1%

+87-4.3

4 0.92 4.1 3.8 4.0 4.3 3


710411

SAAND

SD

30.4%43.5%

17.4%4.3%4.3%

28.9%47.3%

16%5.6%

2.1%

+73.9-8.6

4 1.04 3.9 3.7 3.9 4.2 3

Legend







Class(es): LAB/B104 Size/part: 56 / 50% (28)


Question

#

Score


%+ve%-ve

Median

Stddev

Mean

QuartileBandRank

Comparativemean

25% 50% 75%


1016110

SAAND

SD

35.7%57.1%

3.6%3.6%

0%

32.6%48.3%

12.8%4.9%

1.4%

+92.8-3.6

4 0.70 4.3 3.8 4.0 4.3 4


1115020

SAAND

SD

39.3%53.6%

0%7.1%

0%

30.7%46%

14.7%6.4%

2.1%

+92.9-7.1

4 0.80 4.3 3.7 4.0 4.2 4


411760

SAAND

SD

14.3%39.3%

25%21.4%

0%

23.4%36.5%

29.3%8.2%

2.7%

+53.6-21.4

4 1.00 3.5 3.5 3.7 3.9 2


1010710

SAAND

SD

35.7%35.7%

25%3.6%

0%

30.1%41.9%

18%7.4%

2.6%

+71.4-3.6

4 0.88 4.0 3.7 3.9 4.2 3


1510300

SAAND

SD

53.6%35.7%

10.7%0%0%

34.7%42.8%

15.1%5.4%2.1%

+89.3-0

5 0.69 4.4 3.8 4.0 4.3 4


1115101

SAAND

SD

39.3%53.6%

3.6%0%3.6%

28.9%47.3%

16%5.6%

2.1%

+92.9-3.6

4 0.84 4.3 3.7 3.9 4.2 4

Legend









Question

#

Score


%+ve%-ve

Median

Stddev

Mean

QuartileBandRank

Comparativemean

25% 50% 75%


814300

SAAND

SD

32%56%

12%0%0%

32.6%48.3%

12.8%4.9%

1.4%

+88-0

4 0.65 4.2 3.8 4.0 4.3 3


1111210

SAAND

SD

44%44%

8%4%

0%

30.7%46%

14.7%6.4%

2.1%

+88-4

4 0.79 4.3 3.7 4.0 4.2 4


78712

SAAND

SD

28%32%

28%4%8%

23.4%36.5%

29.3%8.2%

2.7%

+60-12

4 1.18 3.7 3.5 3.7 3.9 3


88810

SAAND

SD

32%32%32%

4%0%

30.1%41.9%

18%7.4%

2.6%

+64-4

4 0.91 3.9 3.7 3.9 4.2 3


912310

SAAND

SD

36%48%

12%4%

0%

34.7%42.8%

15.1%5.4%2.1%

+84-4

4 0.80 4.2 3.8 4.0 4.3 3


712510

SAAND

SD

28%48%

20%4%

0%

28.9%47.3%

16%5.6%

2.1%

+76-4

4 0.82 4.0 3.7 3.9 4.2 3

Legend









Question

#

Score


%+ve%-ve

Median

Stddev

Mean

QuartileBandRank

Comparativemean

25% 50% 75%


1010410

SAAND

SD

40%40%

16%4%

0%

32.6%48.3%

12.8%4.9%

1.4%

+80-4

4 0.85 4.2 3.8 4.0 4.3 3


716200

SAAND

SD

28%64%

8%0%0%

30.7%46%

14.7%6.4%

2.1%

+92-0

4 0.58 4.2 3.7 4.0 4.2 4


512620

SAAND

SD

20%48%

24%8%

0%

23.4%36.5%

29.3%8.2%

2.7%

+68-8

4 0.87 3.8 3.5 3.7 3.9 3


211840

SAAND

SD

8%44%

32%16%

0%

30.1%41.9%

18%7.4%

2.6%

+52-16

4 0.87 3.4 3.7 3.9 4.2 1


611620

SAAND

SD

24%44%

24%8%

0%

34.7%42.8%

15.1%5.4%2.1%

+68-8

4 0.90 3.8 3.8 4.0 4.3 2


415420

SAAND

SD

16%60%

16%8%

0%

28.9%47.3%

16%5.6%

2.1%

+76-8

4 0.80 3.8 3.7 3.9 4.2 2

Legend









Question

#

Score


%+ve%-ve

Median

Stddev

Mean

QuartileBandRank

Comparativemean

25% 50% 75%


415200

SAAND

SD

19%71.4%

9.5%0%0%

32.6%48.3%

12.8%4.9%

1.4%

+90.4-0

4 0.54 4.1 3.8 4.0 4.3 3


712200

SAAND

SD

33.3%57.1%

9.5%0%0%

30.7%46%

14.7%6.4%

2.1%

+90.4-0

4 0.62 4.2 3.7 4.0 4.2 4


25860

SAAND

SD

9.5%23.8%

38.1%28.6%

0%

23.4%36.5%

29.3%8.2%

2.7%

+33.3-28.6

3 0.96 3.1 3.5 3.7 3.9 1


34851

SAAND

SD

14.3%19%

38.1%23.8%

4.8%

30.1%41.9%

18%7.4%

2.6%

+33.3-28.6

3 1.11 3.1 3.7 3.9 4.2 1


59430

SAAND

SD

23.8%42.9%

19%14.3%

0%

34.7%42.8%

15.1%5.4%2.1%

+66.7-14.3

4 1.00 3.8 3.8 4.0 4.3 2


412401

SAAND

SD

19%57.1%

19%0%4.8%

28.9%47.3%

16%5.6%

2.1%

+76.1-4.8

4 0.91 3.9 3.7 3.9 4.2 3

Legend









Question

#

Score


%+ve%-ve

Median

Stddev

Mean

QuartileBandRank

Comparativemean

25% 50% 75%


812300

SAAND

SD

34.8%52.2%

13%0%0%

32.6%48.3%

12.8%4.9%

1.4%

+87-0

4 0.67 4.2 3.8 4.0 4.3 3


613310

SAAND

SD

26.1%56.5%

13%4.3%

0%

30.7%46%

14.7%6.4%

2.1%

+82.6-4.3

4 0.77 4.0 3.7 4.0 4.2 3


59810

SAAND

SD

21.7%39.1%

34.8%4.3%

0%

23.4%36.5%

29.3%8.2%

2.7%

+60.8-4.3

4 0.85 3.8 3.5 3.7 3.9 3


613220

SAAND

SD

26.1%56.5%

8.7%8.7%

0%

30.1%41.9%

18%7.4%

2.6%

+82.6-8.7

4 0.85 4.0 3.7 3.9 4.2 3


811300

SAAND

SD

36.4%50%

13.6%0%0%

34.7%42.8%

15.1%5.4%2.1%

+86.4-0

4 0.69 4.2 3.8 4.0 4.3 3


612400

SAAND

SD

27.3%54.5%

18.2%0%0%

28.9%47.3%

16%5.6%

2.1%

+81.8-0

4 0.68 4.1 3.7 3.9 4.2 3

Legend









Question

#

Score


%+ve%-ve

Median

Stddev

Mean

QuartileBandRank

Comparativemean

25% 50% 75%


616210

SAAND

SD

24%64%

8%4%

0%

32.6%48.3%

12.8%4.9%

1.4%

+88-4

4 0.70 4.1 3.8 4.0 4.3 3


814210

SAAND

SD

32%56%

8%4%

0%

30.7%46%

14.7%6.4%

2.1%

+88-4

4 0.75 4.2 3.7 4.0 4.2 4


29842

SAAND

SD

8%36%

32%16%

8%

23.4%36.5%

29.3%8.2%

2.7%

+44-24

3 1.08 3.2 3.5 3.7 3.9 1


513511

SAAND

SD

20%52%

20%4%4%

30.1%41.9%

18%7.4%

2.6%

+72-8

4 0.96 3.8 3.7 3.9 4.2 2


1110211

SAAND

SD

44%40%

8%4%4%

34.7%42.8%

15.1%5.4%2.1%

+84-8

4 1.03 4.2 3.8 4.0 4.3 3


715120

SAAND

SD

28%60%

4%8%

0%

28.9%47.3%

16%5.6%

2.1%

+88-8

4 0.81 4.1 3.7 3.9 4.2 3

Legend









Question

#

Score


%+ve%-ve

Median

Stddev

Mean

QuartileBandRank

Comparativemean

25% 50% 75%


119420

SAAND

SD

42.3%34.6%

15.4%7.7%

0%

32.6%48.3%

12.8%4.9%

1.4%

+76.9-7.7

4 0.95 4.1 3.8 4.0 4.3 3


138230

SAAND

SD

50%30.8%

7.7%11.5%

0%

30.7%46%

14.7%6.4%

2.1%

+80.8-11.5

4.5 1.02 4.2 3.7 4.0 4.2 4


57

1400

SAAND

SD

19.2%26.9%

53.8%0%0%

23.4%36.5%

29.3%8.2%

2.7%

+46.1-0

3 0.80 3.7 3.5 3.7 3.9 3


59732

SAAND

SD

19.2%34.6%

26.9%11.5%

7.7%

30.1%41.9%

18%7.4%

2.6%

+53.8-19.2

4 1.17 3.5 3.7 3.9 4.2 1


811421

SAAND

SD

30.8%42.3%

15.4%7.7%

3.8%

34.7%42.8%

15.1%5.4%2.1%

+73.1-11.5

4 1.07 3.9 3.8 4.0 4.3 2


614510

SAAND

SD

23.1%53.8%

19.2%3.8%

0%

28.9%47.3%

16%5.6%

2.1%

+76.9-3.8

4 0.77 4.0 3.7 3.9 4.2 3

Legend









Question

#

Score


%+ve%-ve

Median

Stddev

Mean

QuartileBandRank

Comparativemean

25% 50% 75%


811400

SAAND

SD

34.8%47.8%

17.4%0%0%

32.6%48.3%

12.8%4.9%

1.4%

+82.6-0

4 0.72 4.2 3.8 4.0 4.3 3


911300

SAAND

SD

39.1%47.8%

13%0%0%

30.7%46%

14.7%6.4%

2.1%

+86.9-0

4 0.69 4.3 3.7 4.0 4.2 4


86900

SAAND

SD

34.8%26.1%

39.1%0%0%

23.4%36.5%

29.3%8.2%

2.7%

+60.9-0

4 0.88 4.0 3.5 3.7 3.9 4


710420

SAAND

SD

30.4%43.5%

17.4%8.7%

0%

30.1%41.9%

18%7.4%

2.6%

+73.9-8.7

4 0.93 4.0 3.7 3.9 4.2 3


98600

SAAND

SD

39.1%34.8%

26.1%0%0%

34.7%42.8%

15.1%5.4%2.1%

+73.9-0

4 0.81 4.1 3.8 4.0 4.3 3


711500

SAAND

SD

30.4%47.8%

21.7%0%0%

28.9%47.3%

16%5.6%

2.1%

+78.2-0

4 0.73 4.1 3.7 3.9 4.2 3

Legend









Question

#

Score


%+ve%-ve

Median

Stddev

Mean

QuartileBandRank

Comparativemean

25% 50% 75%


57301

SAAND

SD

31.3%43.8%

18.8%0%6.3%

32.6%48.3%

12.8%4.9%

1.4%

+75.1-6.3

4 1.06 3.9 3.8 4.0 4.3 2


46420

SAAND

SD

25%37.5%

25%12.5%

0%

30.7%46%

14.7%6.4%

2.1%

+62.5-12.5

4 1.00 3.8 3.7 4.0 4.2 2


45610

SAAND

SD

25%31.3%37.5%

6.3%0%

23.4%36.5%

29.3%8.2%

2.7%

+56.3-6.3

4 0.93 3.8 3.5 3.7 3.9 3


35260

SAAND

SD

18.8%31.3%

12.5%37.5%

0%

30.1%41.9%

18%7.4%

2.6%

+50.1-37.5

3.5 1.20 3.3 3.7 3.9 4.2 1


39310

SAAND

SD

18.8%56.3%

18.8%6.3%

0%

34.7%42.8%

15.1%5.4%2.1%

+75.1-6.3

4 0.81 3.9 3.8 4.0 4.3 2


36420

SAAND

SD

20%40%

26.7%13.3%

0%

28.9%47.3%

16%5.6%

2.1%

+60-13.3

4 0.98 3.7 3.7 3.9 4.2 2

Legend









Question

#

Score


%+ve%-ve

Median

Stddev

Mean

QuartileBandRank

Comparativemean

25% 50% 75%


813200

SAAND

SD

34.8%56.5%

8.7%0%0%

32.6%48.3%

12.8%4.9%

1.4%

+91.3-0

4 0.62 4.3 3.8 4.0 4.3 4


813200

SAAND

SD

34.8%56.5%

8.7%0%0%

30.7%46%

14.7%6.4%

2.1%

+91.3-0

4 0.62 4.3 3.7 4.0 4.2 4


47

1020

SAAND

SD

17.4%30.4%

43.5%8.7%

0%

23.4%36.5%

29.3%8.2%

2.7%

+47.8-8.7

3 0.90 3.6 3.5 3.7 3.9 2


611510

SAAND

SD

26.1%47.8%

21.7%4.3%

0%

30.1%41.9%

18%7.4%

2.6%

+73.9-4.3

4 0.82 4.0 3.7 3.9 4.2 3


1010300

SAAND

SD

43.5%43.5%

13%0%0%

34.7%42.8%

15.1%5.4%2.1%

+87-0

4 0.70 4.3 3.8 4.0 4.3 4


812300

SAAND

SD

34.8%52.2%

13%0%0%

28.9%47.3%

16%5.6%

2.1%

+87-0

4 0.67 4.2 3.7 3.9 4.2 4

Legend









Question

#

Score


%+ve%-ve

Median

Stddev

Mean

QuartileBandRank

Comparativemean

25% 50% 75%


412410

SAAND

SD

19%57.1%

19%4.8%

0%

32.6%48.3%

12.8%4.9%

1.4%

+76.1-4.8

4 0.77 3.9 3.8 4.0 4.3 2


610320

SAAND

SD

28.6%47.6%

14.3%9.5%

0%

30.7%46%

14.7%6.4%

2.1%

+76.2-9.5

4 0.92 4.0 3.7 4.0 4.2 3


46920

SAAND

SD

19%28.6%

42.9%9.5%

0%

23.4%36.5%

29.3%8.2%

2.7%

+47.6-9.5

3 0.93 3.6 3.5 3.7 3.9 2


312411

SAAND

SD

14.3%57.1%

19%4.8%4.8%

30.1%41.9%

18%7.4%

2.6%

+71.4-9.6

4 0.96 3.7 3.7 3.9 4.2 2


86421

SAAND

SD

38.1%28.6%

19%9.5%

4.8%

34.7%42.8%

15.1%5.4%2.1%

+66.7-14.3

4 1.20 3.9 3.8 4.0 4.3 2


413310

SAAND

SD

19%61.9%

14.3%4.8%

0%

28.9%47.3%

16%5.6%

2.1%

+80.9-4.8

4 0.74 4.0 3.7 3.9 4.2 3

Legend







Class(es): LAB/B115 Size/part: 53 / 34% (18)


Question

#

Score


%+ve%-ve

Median

Stddev

Mean

QuartileBandRank

Comparativemean

25% 50% 75%


48411

SAAND

SD

22.2%44.4%

22.2%5.6%5.6%

32.6%48.3%

12.8%4.9%

1.4%

+66.6-11.2

4 1.07 3.7 3.8 4.0 4.3 1


58401

SAAND

SD

27.8%44.4%

22.2%0%5.6%

30.7%46%

14.7%6.4%

2.1%

+72.2-5.6

4 1.02 3.9 3.7 4.0 4.2 2


37710

SAAND

SD

16.7%38.9%38.9%

5.6%0%

23.4%36.5%

29.3%8.2%

2.7%

+55.6-5.6

4 0.84 3.7 3.5 3.7 3.9 3


35730

SAAND

SD

16.7%27.8%

38.9%16.7%

0%

30.1%41.9%

18%7.4%

2.6%

+44.5-16.7

3 0.98 3.4 3.7 3.9 4.2 1


67221

SAAND

SD

33.3%38.9%

11.1%11.1%

5.6%

34.7%42.8%

15.1%5.4%2.1%

+72.2-16.7

4 1.20 3.8 3.8 4.0 4.3 2


311310

SAAND

SD

16.7%61.1%

16.7%5.6%

0%

28.9%47.3%

16%5.6%

2.1%

+77.8-5.6

4 0.76 3.9 3.7 3.9 4.2 3

Legend







Class(es): LEC/L101 Size/part: 241 / 43.2% (104)


Question

#

Score


%+ve%-ve

Median

Stddev

Mean

QuartileBandRank

Comparativemean

25% 50% 75%


35461841

SAAND

SD

33.7%44.2%

17.3%3.8%1%

32.6%48.3%

12.8%4.9%

1.4%

+77.9-4.8

4 0.87 4.1 3.8 4.0 4.3 3


39431471

SAAND

SD

37.5%41.3%

13.5%6.7%

1%

30.7%46%

14.7%6.4%

2.1%

+78.8-7.7

4 0.93 4.1 3.7 4.0 4.2 3


213530153

SAAND

SD

20.2%33.7%

28.8%14.4%

2.9%

23.4%36.5%

29.3%8.2%

2.7%

+53.9-17.3

4 1.06 3.5 3.5 3.7 3.9 2


194422163

SAAND

SD

18.3%42.3%

21.2%15.4%

2.9%

30.1%41.9%

18%7.4%

2.6%

+60.6-18.3

4 1.05 3.6 3.7 3.9 4.2 1


31411795

SAAND

SD

30.1%39.8%

16.5%8.7%

4.9%

34.7%42.8%

15.1%5.4%2.1%

+69.9-13.6

4 1.11 3.8 3.8 4.0 4.3 2


23512081

SAAND

SD

22.3%49.5%

19.4%7.8%

1%

28.9%47.3%

16%5.6%

2.1%

+71.8-8.8

4 0.89 3.8 3.7 3.9 4.2 2

Legend







Class(es): LEC/L102 Size/part: 313 / 39% (122)


Question

#

Score


%+ve%-ve

Median

Stddev

Mean

QuartileBandRank

Comparativemean

25% 50% 75%


50551032

SAAND

SD

41.7%45.8%

8.3%2.5%1.7%

32.6%48.3%

12.8%4.9%

1.4%

+87.5-4.2

4 0.84 4.2 3.8 4.0 4.3 3


5354850

SAAND

SD

44.2%45%

6.7%4.2%

0%

30.7%46%

14.7%6.4%

2.1%

+89.2-4.2

4 0.77 4.3 3.7 4.0 4.2 4


23394872

SAAND

SD

19.3%32.8%

40.3%5.9%

1.7%

23.4%36.5%

29.3%8.2%

2.7%

+52.1-7.6

4 0.92 3.6 3.5 3.7 3.9 2


34542381

SAAND

SD

28.3%45%

19.2%6.7%

0.8%

30.1%41.9%

18%7.4%

2.6%

+73.3-7.5

4 0.91 3.9 3.7 3.9 4.2 3


58461132

SAAND

SD

48.3%38.3%

9.2%2.5%1.7%

34.7%42.8%

15.1%5.4%2.1%

+86.6-4.2

4 0.86 4.3 3.8 4.0 4.3 4


42641031

SAAND

SD

35%53.3%

8.3%2.5%0.8%

28.9%47.3%

16%5.6%

2.1%

+88.3-3.3

4 0.76 4.2 3.7 3.9 4.2 4

Legend







Class(es): LEC/L103 Size/part: 283 / 39.2% (111)


Question

#

Score


%+ve%-ve

Median

Stddev

Mean

QuartileBandRank

Comparativemean

25% 50% 75%


23681531

SAAND

SD

20.9%61.8%

13.6%2.7%0.9%

32.6%48.3%

12.8%4.9%

1.4%

+82.7-3.6

4 0.74 4.0 3.8 4.0 4.3 3


28631540

SAAND

SD

25.5%57.3%

13.6%3.6%

0%

30.7%46%

14.7%6.4%

2.1%

+82.8-3.6

4 0.73 4.0 3.7 4.0 4.2 3


193643120

SAAND

SD

17.3%32.7%39.1%

10.9%0%

23.4%36.5%

29.3%8.2%

2.7%

+50-10.9

3.5 0.90 3.6 3.5 3.7 3.9 2


214035131

SAAND

SD

19.1%36.4%

31.8%11.8%

0.9%

30.1%41.9%

18%7.4%

2.6%

+55.5-12.7

4 0.96 3.6 3.7 3.9 4.2 1


33522230

SAAND

SD

30%47.3%

20%2.7%0%

34.7%42.8%

15.1%5.4%2.1%

+77.3-2.7

4 0.78 4.0 3.8 4.0 4.3 3


22612051

SAAND

SD

20.2%56%

18.3%4.6%

0.9%

28.9%47.3%

16%5.6%

2.1%

+76.2-5.5

4 0.80 3.9 3.7 3.9 4.2 3

Legend







Class(es): TUT/T101 Size/part: 61 / 27.9% (17)


Question

#

Score


%+ve%-ve

Median

Stddev

Mean

QuartileBandRank

Comparativemean

25% 50% 75%


68210

SAAND

SD

35.3%47.1%

11.8%5.9%

0%

32.6%48.3%

12.8%4.9%

1.4%

+82.4-5.9

4 0.86 4.1 3.8 4.0 4.3 3


610100

SAAND

SD

35.3%58.8%

5.9%0%0%

30.7%46%

14.7%6.4%

2.1%

+94.1-0

4 0.59 4.3 3.7 4.0 4.2 4


18620

SAAND

SD

5.9%47.1%

35.3%11.8%

0%

23.4%36.5%

29.3%8.2%

2.7%

+53-11.8

4 0.80 3.5 3.5 3.7 3.9 2


212201

SAAND

SD

11.8%70.6%

11.8%0%5.9%

30.1%41.9%

18%7.4%

2.6%

+82.4-5.9

4 0.88 3.8 3.7 3.9 4.2 2


610010

SAAND

SD

35.3%58.8%

0%5.9%

0%

34.7%42.8%

15.1%5.4%2.1%

+94.1-5.9

4 0.75 4.2 3.8 4.0 4.3 3


411101

SAAND

SD

23.5%64.7%

5.9%0%5.9%

28.9%47.3%

16%5.6%

2.1%

+88.2-5.9

4 0.94 4.0 3.7 3.9 4.2 3

Legend









Question

#

Score


%+ve%-ve

Median

Stddev

Mean

QuartileBandRank

Comparativemean

25% 50% 75%


99211

SAAND

SD

40.9%40.9%

9.1%4.5%4.5%

32.6%48.3%

12.8%4.9%

1.4%

+81.8-9

4 1.06 4.1 3.8 4.0 4.3 3


98320

SAAND

SD

40.9%36.4%

13.6%9.1%

0%

30.7%46%

14.7%6.4%

2.1%

+77.3-9.1

4 0.97 4.1 3.7 4.0 4.2 3


67810

SAAND

SD

27.3%31.8%36.4%

4.5%0%

23.4%36.5%

29.3%8.2%

2.7%

+59.1-4.5

4 0.91 3.8 3.5 3.7 3.9 3


77530

SAAND

SD

31.8%31.8%

22.7%13.6%

0%

30.1%41.9%

18%7.4%

2.6%

+63.6-13.6

4 1.05 3.8 3.7 3.9 4.2 2


1010110

SAAND

SD

45.5%45.5%

4.5%4.5%

0%

34.7%42.8%

15.1%5.4%2.1%

+91-4.5

4 0.78 4.3 3.8 4.0 4.3 4


710320

SAAND

SD

31.8%45.5%

13.6%9.1%

0%

28.9%47.3%

16%5.6%

2.1%

+77.3-9.1

4 0.93 4.0 3.7 3.9 4.2 3

Legend







Class(es): TUT/T103 Size/part: 60 / 45% (27)


Question

#

Score


%+ve%-ve

Median

Stddev

Mean

QuartileBandRank

Comparativemean

25% 50% 75%


915300

SAAND

SD

33.3%55.6%

11.1%0%0%

32.6%48.3%

12.8%4.9%

1.4%

+88.9-0

4 0.64 4.2 3.8 4.0 4.3 3


817200

SAAND

SD

29.6%63%

7.4%0%0%

30.7%46%

14.7%6.4%

2.1%

+92.6-0

4 0.58 4.2 3.7 4.0 4.2 4


49

1031

SAAND

SD

14.8%33.3%37%

11.1%3.7%

23.4%36.5%

29.3%8.2%

2.7%

+48.1-14.8

3 1.01 3.4 3.5 3.7 3.9 1


513621

SAAND

SD

18.5%48.1%

22.2%7.4%

3.7%

30.1%41.9%

18%7.4%

2.6%

+66.6-11.1

4 0.99 3.7 3.7 3.9 4.2 2


814311

SAAND

SD

29.6%51.9%

11.1%3.7%3.7%

34.7%42.8%

15.1%5.4%2.1%

+81.5-7.4

4 0.96 4.0 3.8 4.0 4.3 3


618210

SAAND

SD

22.2%66.7%

7.4%3.7%

0%

28.9%47.3%

16%5.6%

2.1%

+88.9-3.7

4 0.68 4.1 3.7 3.9 4.2 3

Legend









Question

#

Score


%+ve%-ve

Median

Stddev

Mean

QuartileBandRank

Comparativemean

25% 50% 75%


712300

SAAND

SD

31.8%54.5%

13.6%0%0%

32.6%48.3%

12.8%4.9%

1.4%

+86.3-0

4 0.66 4.2 3.8 4.0 4.3 3


911200

SAAND

SD

40.9%50%

9.1%0%0%

30.7%46%

14.7%6.4%

2.1%

+90.9-0

4 0.65 4.3 3.7 4.0 4.2 4


48910

SAAND

SD

18.2%36.4%40.9%

4.5%0%

23.4%36.5%

29.3%8.2%

2.7%

+54.6-4.5

4 0.84 3.7 3.5 3.7 3.9 3


511420

SAAND

SD

22.7%50%

18.2%9.1%

0%

30.1%41.9%

18%7.4%

2.6%

+72.7-9.1

4 0.89 3.9 3.7 3.9 4.2 3


107500

SAAND

SD

45.5%31.8%

22.7%0%0%

34.7%42.8%

15.1%5.4%2.1%

+77.3-0

4 0.81 4.2 3.8 4.0 4.3 3


612310

SAAND

SD

27.3%54.5%

13.6%4.5%

0%

28.9%47.3%

16%5.6%

2.1%

+81.8-4.5

4 0.79 4.0 3.7 3.9 4.2 3

Legend









Question

#

Score


%+ve%-ve

Median

Stddev

Mean

QuartileBandRank

Comparativemean

25% 50% 75%


1213101

SAAND

SD

44.4%48.1%

3.7%0%3.7%

32.6%48.3%

12.8%4.9%

1.4%

+92.5-3.7

4 0.87 4.3 3.8 4.0 4.3 4


1212120

SAAND

SD

44.4%44.4%

3.7%7.4%

0%

30.7%46%

14.7%6.4%

2.1%

+88.8-7.4

4 0.86 4.3 3.7 4.0 4.2 4


79731

SAAND

SD

25.9%33.3%

25.9%11.1%

3.7%

23.4%36.5%

29.3%8.2%

2.7%

+59.2-14.8

4 1.11 3.7 3.5 3.7 3.9 3


911430

SAAND

SD

33.3%40.7%

14.8%11.1%

0%

30.1%41.9%

18%7.4%

2.6%

+74-11.1

4 0.98 4.0 3.7 3.9 4.2 3


1310211

SAAND

SD

48.1%37%

7.4%3.7%3.7%

34.7%42.8%

15.1%5.4%2.1%

+85.1-7.4

4 1.01 4.2 3.8 4.0 4.3 3


1210401

SAAND

SD

44.4%37%

14.8%0%3.7%

28.9%47.3%

16%5.6%

2.1%

+81.4-3.7

4 0.96 4.2 3.7 3.9 4.2 4

Legend









Question

#

Score


%+ve%-ve

Median

Stddev

Mean

QuartileBandRank

Comparativemean

25% 50% 75%


813500

SAAND

SD

30.8%50%

19.2%0%0%

32.6%48.3%

12.8%4.9%

1.4%

+80.8-0

4 0.71 4.1 3.8 4.0 4.3 3


812420

SAAND

SD

30.8%46.2%

15.4%7.7%

0%

30.7%46%

14.7%6.4%

2.1%

+77-7.7

4 0.89 4.0 3.7 4.0 4.2 3


96

1010

SAAND

SD

34.6%23.1%

38.5%3.8%

0%

23.4%36.5%

29.3%8.2%

2.7%

+57.7-3.8

4 0.95 3.9 3.5 3.7 3.9 4


710630

SAAND

SD

26.9%38.5%

23.1%11.5%

0%

30.1%41.9%

18%7.4%

2.6%

+65.4-11.5

4 0.98 3.8 3.7 3.9 4.2 2


99620

SAAND

SD

34.6%34.6%

23.1%7.7%

0%

34.7%42.8%

15.1%5.4%2.1%

+69.2-7.7

4 0.96 4.0 3.8 4.0 4.3 3


715400

SAAND

SD

26.9%57.7%

15.4%0%0%

28.9%47.3%

16%5.6%

2.1%

+84.6-0

4 0.65 4.1 3.7 3.9 4.2 3

Legend









Question

#

Score


%+ve%-ve

Median

Stddev

Mean

QuartileBandRank

Comparativemean

25% 50% 75%


911620

SAAND

SD

32.1%39.3%

21.4%7.1%

0%

32.6%48.3%

12.8%4.9%

1.4%

+71.4-7.1

4 0.92 4.0 3.8 4.0 4.3 3


813610

SAAND

SD

28.6%46.4%

21.4%3.6%

0%

30.7%46%

14.7%6.4%

2.1%

+75-3.6

4 0.82 4.0 3.7 4.0 4.2 3


412921

SAAND

SD

14.3%42.9%

32.1%7.1%

3.6%

23.4%36.5%

29.3%8.2%

2.7%

+57.2-10.7

4 0.96 3.6 3.5 3.7 3.9 2


612541

SAAND

SD

21.4%42.9%

17.9%14.3%

3.6%

30.1%41.9%

18%7.4%

2.6%

+64.3-17.9

4 1.10 3.6 3.7 3.9 4.2 1


109621

SAAND

SD

35.7%32.1%

21.4%7.1%

3.6%

34.7%42.8%

15.1%5.4%2.1%

+67.8-10.7

4 1.10 3.9 3.8 4.0 4.3 2


711621

SAAND

SD

25.9%40.7%

22.2%7.4%

3.7%

28.9%47.3%

16%5.6%

2.1%

+66.6-11.1

4 1.05 3.8 3.7 3.9 4.2 2

Legend









Question

#

Score


%+ve%-ve

Median

Stddev

Mean

QuartileBandRank

Comparativemean

25% 50% 75%


810120

SAAND

SD

38.1%47.6%

4.8%9.5%

0%

32.6%48.3%

12.8%4.9%

1.4%

+85.7-9.5

4 0.91 4.1 3.8 4.0 4.3 3


118110

SAAND

SD

52.4%38.1%

4.8%4.8%

0%

30.7%46%

14.7%6.4%

2.1%

+90.5-4.8

5 0.80 4.4 3.7 4.0 4.2 4


37820

SAAND

SD

15%35%40%

10%0%

23.4%36.5%

29.3%8.2%

2.7%

+50-10

3.5 0.89 3.6 3.5 3.7 3.9 2


49701

SAAND

SD

19%42.9%

33.3%0%4.8%

30.1%41.9%

18%7.4%

2.6%

+61.9-4.8

4 0.96 3.7 3.7 3.9 4.2 2


89211

SAAND

SD

38.1%42.9%

9.5%4.8%4.8%

34.7%42.8%

15.1%5.4%2.1%

+81-9.6

4 1.07 4.0 3.8 4.0 4.3 3


612210

SAAND

SD

28.6%57.1%

9.5%4.8%

0%

28.9%47.3%

16%5.6%

2.1%

+85.7-4.8

4 0.77 4.1 3.7 3.9 4.2 3

Legend









Question

#

Score


%+ve%-ve

Median

Stddev

Mean

QuartileBandRank

Comparativemean

25% 50% 75%


713100

SAAND

SD

33.3%61.9%

4.8%0%0%

32.6%48.3%

12.8%4.9%

1.4%

+95.2-0

4 0.56 4.3 3.8 4.0 4.3 4


811200

SAAND

SD

38.1%52.4%

9.5%0%0%

30.7%46%

14.7%6.4%

2.1%

+90.5-0

4 0.64 4.3 3.7 4.0 4.2 4


45

1020

SAAND

SD

19%23.8%

47.6%9.5%

0%

23.4%36.5%

29.3%8.2%

2.7%

+42.8-9.5

3 0.93 3.5 3.5 3.7 3.9 2


66900

SAAND

SD

28.6%28.6%

42.9%0%0%

30.1%41.9%

18%7.4%

2.6%

+57.2-0

4 0.85 3.9 3.7 3.9 4.2 3


98400

SAAND

SD

42.9%38.1%

19%0%0%

34.7%42.8%

15.1%5.4%2.1%

+81-0

4 0.77 4.2 3.8 4.0 4.3 3


613200

SAAND

SD

28.6%61.9%

9.5%0%0%

28.9%47.3%

16%5.6%

2.1%

+90.5-0

4 0.60 4.2 3.7 3.9 4.2 4

Legend







Class(es): TUT/T110 Size/part: 2 / 0% (0)


Question

#

Score


%+ve%-ve

Median

Stddev

Mean

QuartileBandRank

Comparativemean

25% 50% 75%


00000

SAAND

SD

0%0%0%0%0%

32.6%48.3%

12.8%4.9%

1.4%

+-

- - - 3.8 4.0 4.3 -


00000

SAAND

SD

0%0%0%0%0%

30.7%46%

14.7%6.4%

2.1%

+-

- - - 3.7 4.0 4.2 -


00000

SAAND

SD

0%0%0%0%0%

23.4%36.5%

29.3%8.2%

2.7%

+-

- - - 3.5 3.7 3.9 -


00000

SAAND

SD

0%0%0%0%0%

30.1%41.9%

18%7.4%

2.6%

+-

- - - 3.7 3.9 4.2 -


00000

SAAND

SD

0%0%0%0%0%

34.7%42.8%

15.1%5.4%2.1%

+-

- - - 3.8 4.0 4.3 -


00000

SAAND

SD

0%0%0%0%0%

28.9%47.3%

16%5.6%

2.1%

+-

- - - 3.7 3.9 4.2 -

Legend









Question

#

Score


%+ve%-ve

Median

Stddev

Mean

QuartileBandRank

Comparativemean

25% 50% 75%


816311

SAAND

SD

27.6%55.2%

10.3%3.4%3.4%

32.6%48.3%

12.8%4.9%

1.4%

+82.8-6.8

4 0.93 4.0 3.8 4.0 4.3 3


1115201

SAAND

SD

37.9%51.7%

6.9%0%3.4%

30.7%46%

14.7%6.4%

2.1%

+89.6-3.4

4 0.86 4.2 3.7 4.0 4.2 4


713450

SAAND

SD

24.1%44.8%

13.8%17.2%

0%

23.4%36.5%

29.3%8.2%

2.7%

+68.9-17.2

4 1.02 3.8 3.5 3.7 3.9 3


513740

SAAND

SD

17.2%44.8%

24.1%13.8%

0%

30.1%41.9%

18%7.4%

2.6%

+62-13.8

4 0.94 3.7 3.7 3.9 4.2 2


913511

SAAND

SD

31%44.8%

17.2%3.4%3.4%

34.7%42.8%

15.1%5.4%2.1%

+75.8-6.8

4 0.98 4.0 3.8 4.0 4.3 3


517700

SAAND

SD

17.2%58.6%

24.1%0%0%

28.9%47.3%

16%5.6%

2.1%

+75.8-0

4 0.65 3.9 3.7 3.9 4.2 3

Legend









Question

#

Score


%+ve%-ve

Median

Stddev

Mean

QuartileBandRank

Comparativemean

25% 50% 75%


511421

SAAND

SD

21.7%47.8%

17.4%8.7%

4.3%

32.6%48.3%

12.8%4.9%

1.4%

+69.5-13

4 1.05 3.7 3.8 4.0 4.3 1


510530

SAAND

SD

21.7%43.5%

21.7%13%

0%

30.7%46%

14.7%6.4%

2.1%

+65.2-13

4 0.96 3.7 3.7 4.0 4.2 2


26960

SAAND

SD

8.7%26.1%

39.1%26.1%

0%

23.4%36.5%

29.3%8.2%

2.7%

+34.8-26.1

3 0.94 3.2 3.5 3.7 3.9 1


27860

SAAND

SD

8.7%30.4%34.8%

26.1%0%

30.1%41.9%

18%7.4%

2.6%

+39.1-26.1

3 0.95 3.2 3.7 3.9 4.2 1


311522

SAAND

SD

13%47.8%

21.7%8.7%8.7%

34.7%42.8%

15.1%5.4%2.1%

+60.8-17.4

4 1.12 3.5 3.8 4.0 4.3 1


211460

SAAND

SD

8.7%47.8%

17.4%26.1%

0%

28.9%47.3%

16%5.6%

2.1%

+56.5-26.1

4 0.99 3.4 3.7 3.9 4.2 1

Legend









Question

#

Score


%+ve%-ve

Median

Stddev

Mean

QuartileBandRank

Comparativemean

25% 50% 75%


719600

SAAND

SD

21.9%59.4%

18.8%0%0%

32.6%48.3%

12.8%4.9%

1.4%

+81.3-0

4 0.65 4.0 3.8 4.0 4.3 3


818330

SAAND

SD

25%56.3%

9.4%9.4%

0%

30.7%46%

14.7%6.4%

2.1%

+81.3-9.4

4 0.86 4.0 3.7 4.0 4.2 3


57

1532

SAAND

SD

15.6%21.9%

46.9%9.4%6.3%

23.4%36.5%

29.3%8.2%

2.7%

+37.5-15.7

3 1.06 3.3 3.5 3.7 3.9 1


5111051

SAAND

SD

15.6%34.4%31.3%

15.6%3.1%

30.1%41.9%

18%7.4%

2.6%

+50-18.7

3.5 1.05 3.4 3.7 3.9 4.2 1


1014530

SAAND

SD

31.3%43.8%

15.6%9.4%

0%

34.7%42.8%

15.1%5.4%2.1%

+75.1-9.4

4 0.93 4.0 3.8 4.0 4.3 3


617630

SAAND

SD

18.8%53.1%

18.8%9.4%

0%

28.9%47.3%

16%5.6%

2.1%

+71.9-9.4

4 0.86 3.8 3.7 3.9 4.2 2

Legend









Question

#

Score


%+ve%-ve

Median

Stddev

Mean

QuartileBandRank

Comparativemean

25% 50% 75%


711410

SAAND

SD

30.4%47.8%

17.4%4.3%

0%

32.6%48.3%

12.8%4.9%

1.4%

+78.2-4.3

4 0.82 4.0 3.8 4.0 4.3 3


109310

SAAND

SD

43.5%39.1%

13%4.3%

0%

30.7%46%

14.7%6.4%

2.1%

+82.6-4.3

4 0.85 4.2 3.7 4.0 4.2 4


49910

SAAND

SD

17.4%39.1%39.1%

4.3%0%

23.4%36.5%

29.3%8.2%

2.7%

+56.5-4.3

4 0.82 3.7 3.5 3.7 3.9 3


610340

SAAND

SD

26.1%43.5%

13%17.4%

0%

30.1%41.9%

18%7.4%

2.6%

+69.6-17.4

4 1.04 3.8 3.7 3.9 4.2 2


910300

SAAND

SD

40.9%45.5%

13.6%0%0%

34.7%42.8%

15.1%5.4%2.1%

+86.4-0

4 0.70 4.3 3.8 4.0 4.3 4


810400

SAAND

SD

36.4%45.5%

18.2%0%0%

28.9%47.3%

16%5.6%

2.1%

+81.9-0

4 0.73 4.2 3.7 3.9 4.2 4

Legend









Question

#

Score


%+ve%-ve

Median

Stddev

Mean

QuartileBandRank

Comparativemean

25% 50% 75%


68200

SAAND

SD

37.5%50%

12.5%0%0%

32.6%48.3%

12.8%4.9%

1.4%

+87.5-0

4 0.68 4.3 3.8 4.0 4.3 4


76210

SAAND

SD

43.8%37.5%

12.5%6.3%

0%

30.7%46%

14.7%6.4%

2.1%

+81.3-6.3

4 0.91 4.2 3.7 4.0 4.2 4


34720

SAAND

SD

18.8%25%

43.8%12.5%

0%

23.4%36.5%

29.3%8.2%

2.7%

+43.8-12.5

3 0.97 3.5 3.5 3.7 3.9 2


56410

SAAND

SD

31.3%37.5%

25%6.3%

0%

30.1%41.9%

18%7.4%

2.6%

+68.8-6.3

4 0.93 3.9 3.7 3.9 4.2 3


85300

SAAND

SD

50%31.3%

18.8%0%0%

34.7%42.8%

15.1%5.4%2.1%

+81.3-0

4.5 0.79 4.3 3.8 4.0 4.3 4


59200

SAAND

SD

31.3%56.3%

12.5%0%0%

28.9%47.3%

16%5.6%

2.1%

+87.6-0

4 0.66 4.2 3.7 3.9 4.2 4

Legend



1001msc-sec-104795-3151-1-1 (1)

Documents