100701 kooij.aesop space for innovation
TRANSCRIPT
8/6/2019 100701 Kooij.aesoP Space for Innovation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/100701-kooijaesop-space-for-innovation 1/3
book of AbstrActs
24th
AEsoP AnnuAl confErEncE 2010
YTK • AAlTo UniversiTY • FinlAnd • JUlY 7–10 2010
r
l
i l
i l
i il
8/6/2019 100701 Kooij.aesoP Space for Innovation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/100701-kooijaesop-space-for-innovation 2/3
237YTK • Aalto University
Urban Planning and Physical Form
The move from culturally unacceptable ideologically based Modernism, to supercially
similar yet acceptable Neo-modernism, is a subtext of the analysis, revealing how the
culture of an era informs the producon of architectural form and urban space. This
exposes the tension that exists between the desire to make ‘places’ and the drivers of
globalism. The value of place as dened by its icons is a key feature of this new (peculiarly)
heritage responsive context, throwing up unexpected and bizarre results, driven bythe desire to produce ‘statement’ buildings and ‘quality’ places. The past, present and
future value of these case studies is used to idenfy trajectories of use and themes for
a revaluaon of the role and value of urban (and built) space in urban regeneraon.
The basis for funconally dened built form and urban planning models is the idea
that funcon is a valid means of dening use. This paradigm starts to collapse when the
market distorts the funconal raonale for the producon of space. Crically use has to
map onto funcon or the underlying model breaks down. When does a dwelling space
become a dwelling style space, when does an urban space become and urban style space. The queson of how to dene a post funconalist and post formalist planning
paradigm will be discussed, along with the role of design in the regeneraon process.The legacy of urban strategies that rely on the idea of connuous growth appears
quesonable in the new climate of austerity and sustainability. Luxury depends on
exclusivity. When anything becomes ubiquitous it is no longer perceived as a luxury,
becoming either a right, or banal, or a problem. The inner city lo market has rapidly
moved through the cycle of luxury to ubiquity, what is the legacy that this has le Brish
cies?
ReferencesUrban Design Compendium Vol. 1 & 2 (Housing Corporaon/English Partnerships 2000 & 2007).
Kooij, Henk-Jan
Radboud University (Netherlands)
Space for Innovaton
Cies and regions in Europe struggle with nding and developing concrete policy-tools
for strenghtening their spaal-economic structure in the light of the knowledge-based
economy and the Lisbon Strategy. One policy-tool might be the spaal-economic concept
of campus development, which is increasingly iniated in the The Netherlands.
The use of spaal concepts in The Netherlands has a rich tradion in spaal planning,
but changed over me due to instuonal changes. Spaal concepts are seen as
normave and thus present images of a desired spaal structure. They are used to make
sense of the complex world we live in, and to structure that world. Originally, concepts in
The Netherlands were mostly developed by the naonal government as generic spaal
concepts. However, there has been a shi towards more regional and locally applied and
developed concepts. Moreover, the role of the concepts also broadened: from guiding
policy of lower ers of government with generic concepts, towards arculang identy
and posioning of regions. Apart from these shis in use, also the scope of concepts has
changed. Before, spaal concepts were only aimed at structuring spaal development,
but since the publicaon of the Spaal Strategy in 2004, also spaal-economic development is envisioned in concepts. As a result, spaal-economic concepts are moreconcerned with specic regions and places that contribute considerable to the economic
growth of the country.
8/6/2019 100701 Kooij.aesoP Space for Innovation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/100701-kooijaesop-space-for-innovation 3/3
238 AESOP 2010
Track 8
A well-known local spaal-economic concept is the Science Park concept, which had
been widely implemented throughout the world. A Science Park is generally seen as
a property-based development close to a place of learning and supplies high quality
premises, and is developed by a mix of private and public actors in the light of knowledge-
based regional development.
Recently, another spaal-economic concept can be seen throughout the Netherlandsunder the label of campus development. Seen as space for innovaon, this concept
shares much with the Science Park concept, however, this is not menoned by policy-
makers. Moreover, it is not clear to policy-makers what the campus concept is, yet it
seems highly popular among policy-makers. Therefore, the quesons addressed in this
paper are: what is the campus concept according to policy-makers? What is its relaon
with the science park concept? Can the campus concept be seen as a proliferaon of the
Science Park concept? How is this new concept being shaped in planning pracces?
Through a qualitave study on various actors in The Netherlands, this paper aims
at generang insight into the process of shaping the campus concept. Moreover, via
analysis of policy reports insight is gained into the with and extent of this developmentin The Netherlands. The paper ends with quesons for future research concerning the
exisng literature of spaal concepts, in which the capacity of concepts to structure
policy is underexposed.
ReferencesVan Duinen, L. (2004) Planning Imagery: the emergence and polical acceptance of planning concepts in
Dutch naonal planning. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Jensen, O. B. & Richardson, T. (2004) Making European Space. Mobility, power and territorial identy .
London and New York: Routledge.Zonneveld, W. (2005) Mulple visioning: New ways of construcng transnaonal spaal visions,
Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 23( 1), pp. 41–62.
Kotval, Zenia & Machemer, Patricia & Mullin, John
Michigan State University (United States)
Temporary Uses as Strategies for Urban Redevelopment
Many cies have experienced or are experiencing disinvestment. This trend has le
many cies with areas of underulized, or vacant, land and building space. Vacant land
is not only a signal of disinvestment but can also become a targeted area for acvies
that could threaten the health and safety of a community. Finding producve, temporary
uses for vacant land and buildings can reverse this trend and instead foster a sense of community. In addion, maintenance of vacant or abandoned lots and buildings can be
a signicant drain on a municipality’s resources.
In addion to creang a producve use, curbing crime, and saving on maintenance
costs, other possible benets of temporary uses include:
– revenue for a city
– income for businesses/residents in a city
– reducon of blight/crime
– development of interest/investment in an area
– increased standard of living
– market demand to incubate future permanent uses