12-02-18: media (11-20): problem solving v. parasite leeching survey

20
Radical Honoursty P O Box 5042 George East, 6539 Tel: (071) 170 1954 CITY PRESS Editor: Ferial Haffajee Dear City Press Editor / Ms. Haffajee, Problem Solving Leadership Survey: Request for Information: Articles focussed on Problem Solving Leadership Individuals or Organisations I am in the process of researching Problem Solving Leadership, what it is, and is not; and how it is different from Parasite Leeching (Fake Problem Solving) Leadership. I am attempting to determine South African Media (Editors and Journalists) level of commitment, understanding, interest and reportage specifically focussed on Problem Solving leadership. ‘If I had one hour to save the world I would spend fifty-five minutes defining the problem and only five minutes finding the solution.’ – Albert Einstein Definition / Put Simply: Problem solving leadership only acts towards solving any problem to enable the problem to be clearly and succinctly defined. Fanclubs and followers are eschewed, advice and suggestions towards clearly defining the problem are accepted based purely on merit of the suggestions, irrespective of individuals social-standing.

Upload: andrea-muhrrteyn

Post on 29-Mar-2016

219 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

12-02-18: Media (11-20): Problem Solving v. Parasite Leeching Survey: | City Press | Daily Dispatch | Daily Maverick | Daily News | Financial Mail | Farmers Weekly | George Herald | The Herald | Independent on Saturday | Leadership Online |

TRANSCRIPT

Radical Honoursty

P O Box 5042 George East, 6539

Tel: (071) 170 1954

CITY PRESS Editor: Ferial Haffajee Dear City Press Editor / Ms. Haffajee,

Problem Solving Leadership Survey: Request for Information: Articles focussed on Problem Solving Leadership Individuals or Organisations I am in the process of researching Problem Solving Leadership, what it is, and is not; and how it is different from Parasite Leeching (Fake Problem Solving) Leadership. I am attempting to determine South African Media (Editors and Journalists) level of commitment, understanding, interest and reportage specifically focussed on Problem Solving leadership.

‘If I had one hour to save the world I would spend fifty-five minutes defining the problem and only five minutes finding the solution.’ – Albert Einstein

Definition / Put Simply: Problem solving leadership only acts towards solving any problem to enable the problem to be clearly and succinctly defined. Fanclubs and followers are eschewed, advice and suggestions towards clearly defining the problem are accepted based purely on merit of the suggestions, irrespective of individuals social-standing.

Parasitical Leeching Leadership generally choose some kind of ideology whereby they vaguely and ambiguously pretend to solve vague and abstract problems; while the predominant motive is to grow themselves a fan club/following, for their own socio-political or economic benefit. Their Parasite Leadership ‘problem solving’ deliberately avoids any focus on clearly defining any problem, or any investigation of the root cause of the problem. Their primary focus is to divert their fan clubs attention towards the symptoms of the problem, using emotional blame game language focussed on another Parasitical Leeching Leaders fan club. Such Parasitical Leeching leaders – like WWF Wrestlers – thereby entrench the Parasitical Leeching Leadership paradigm (Fake Left Wing v Right Wing Political Paradigm Explained1). Put differently: The bath is overflowing, Parasitical Leeching Leaders focus their fan club on endlessly mopping up the floor; who is mopping, who isn’t, etc. All attention towards defining the problem as the running tap is strictly avoided, including vilifying anyone who even mentions the possibility of a tap leaking being the source of the problem. The focus is to perpetuate the problem indefinitely while socio-politically exploiting the problem for personal gain, by means of manipulating the emotions of ‘followers’, related to the symptoms of the problem. Ninety-Nine percent of the worlds so-called ‘leadership’ is PARASITE LEECHING LEADERSHIP.

Survey Questions:

1. What is your Publication / Editorial definition of leadership?

2. Do you recognize the difference between Problem Solving Leadership and Parasitical Leeching Leadership?

3. Has your publication covered any individuals or organisations focussed on Problem Solving Leadership, and if so, a list of the articles that did so.

Respectfully Submitted,

Lara Johnstone Radical Honoursty SQ Worm Sosiety www.sqworms.co.nr

1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMPAfDHEFbQ

Radical Honoursty

P O Box 5042 George East, 6539

Tel: (071) 170 1954

DAILY DISPATCH Editor: Dear Daily Dispatch Editor,

Problem Solving Leadership Survey: Request for Information: Articles focussed on Problem Solving Leadership Individuals or Organisations I am in the process of researching Problem Solving Leadership, what it is, and is not; and how it is different from Parasite Leeching (Fake Problem Solving) Leadership. I am attempting to determine South African Media (Editors and Journalists) level of commitment, understanding, interest and reportage specifically focussed on Problem Solving leadership.

‘If I had one hour to save the world I would spend fifty-five minutes defining the problem and only five minutes finding the solution.’ – Albert Einstein

Definition / Put Simply: Problem solving leadership only acts towards solving any problem to enable the problem to be clearly and succinctly defined. Fanclubs and followers are eschewed, advice and suggestions towards clearly defining the problem are accepted based purely on merit of the suggestions, irrespective of individuals social-standing.

Parasitical Leeching Leadership generally choose some kind of ideology whereby they vaguely and ambiguously pretend to solve vague and abstract problems; while the predominant motive is to grow themselves a fan club/following, for their own socio-political or economic benefit. Their Parasite Leadership ‘problem solving’ deliberately avoids any focus on clearly defining any problem, or any investigation of the root cause of the problem. Their primary focus is to divert their fan clubs attention towards the symptoms of the problem, using emotional blame game language focussed on another Parasitical Leeching Leaders fan club. Such Parasitical Leeching leaders – like WWF Wrestlers – thereby entrench the Parasitical Leeching Leadership paradigm (Fake Left Wing v Right Wing Political Paradigm Explained1). Put differently: The bath is overflowing, Parasitical Leeching Leaders focus their fan club on endlessly mopping up the floor; who is mopping, who isn’t, etc. All attention towards defining the problem as the running tap is strictly avoided, including vilifying anyone who even mentions the possibility of a tap leaking being the source of the problem. The focus is to perpetuate the problem indefinitely while socio-politically exploiting the problem for personal gain, by means of manipulating the emotions of ‘followers’, related to the symptoms of the problem. Ninety-Nine percent of the worlds so-called ‘leadership’ is PARASITE LEECHING LEADERSHIP.

Survey Questions:

1. What is your Publication / Editorial definition of leadership?

2. Do you recognize the difference between Problem Solving Leadership and Parasitical Leeching Leadership?

3. Has your publication covered any individuals or organisations focussed on Problem Solving Leadership, and if so, a list of the articles that did so.

Respectfully Submitted,

Lara Johnstone Radical Honoursty SQ Worm Sosiety www.sqworms.co.nr

1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMPAfDHEFbQ

Radical Honoursty

P O Box 5042 George East, 6539

Tel: (071) 170 1954

DAILY MAVERICK Editor: Brkic Branko Dear Daily Maverick Editor / Mr. Branko,

Problem Solving Leadership Survey: Request for Information: Articles focussed on Problem Solving Leadership Individuals or Organisations I am in the process of researching Problem Solving Leadership, what it is, and is not; and how it is different from Parasite Leeching (Fake Problem Solving) Leadership. I am attempting to determine South African Media (Editors and Journalists) level of commitment, understanding, interest and reportage specifically focussed on Problem Solving leadership.

‘If I had one hour to save the world I would spend fifty-five minutes defining the problem and only five minutes finding the solution.’ – Albert Einstein

Definition / Put Simply: Problem solving leadership only acts towards solving any problem to enable the problem to be clearly and succinctly defined. Fanclubs and followers are eschewed, advice and suggestions towards clearly defining the problem are accepted based purely on merit of the suggestions, irrespective of individuals social-standing.

Parasitical Leeching Leadership generally choose some kind of ideology whereby they vaguely and ambiguously pretend to solve vague and abstract problems; while the predominant motive is to grow themselves a fan club/following, for their own socio-political or economic benefit. Their Parasite Leadership ‘problem solving’ deliberately avoids any focus on clearly defining any problem, or any investigation of the root cause of the problem. Their primary focus is to divert their fan clubs attention towards the symptoms of the problem, using emotional blame game language focussed on another Parasitical Leeching Leaders fan club. Such Parasitical Leeching leaders – like WWF Wrestlers – thereby entrench the Parasitical Leeching Leadership paradigm (Fake Left Wing v Right Wing Political Paradigm Explained1). Put differently: The bath is overflowing, Parasitical Leeching Leaders focus their fan club on endlessly mopping up the floor; who is mopping, who isn’t, etc. All attention towards defining the problem as the running tap is strictly avoided, including vilifying anyone who even mentions the possibility of a tap leaking being the source of the problem. The focus is to perpetuate the problem indefinitely while socio-politically exploiting the problem for personal gain, by means of manipulating the emotions of ‘followers’, related to the symptoms of the problem. Ninety-Nine percent of the worlds so-called ‘leadership’ is PARASITE LEECHING LEADERSHIP.

Survey Questions:

1. What is your Publication / Editorial definition of leadership?

2. Do you recognize the difference between Problem Solving Leadership and Parasitical Leeching Leadership?

3. Has your publication covered any individuals or organisations focussed on Problem Solving Leadership, and if so, a list of the articles that did so.

Respectfully Submitted,

Lara Johnstone Radical Honoursty SQ Worm Sosiety www.sqworms.co.nr

1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMPAfDHEFbQ

Radical Honoursty

P O Box 5042 George East, 6539

Tel: (071) 170 1954

DAILY NEWS Editor: Alan Dunn Dear Daily News Editor / Mr. Dunn,

Problem Solving Leadership Survey: Request for Information: Articles focussed on Problem Solving Leadership Individuals or Organisations I am in the process of researching Problem Solving Leadership, what it is, and is not; and how it is different from Parasite Leeching (Fake Problem Solving) Leadership. I am attempting to determine South African Media (Editors and Journalists) level of commitment, understanding, interest and reportage specifically focussed on Problem Solving leadership.

‘If I had one hour to save the world I would spend fifty-five minutes defining the problem and only five minutes finding the solution.’ – Albert Einstein

Definition / Put Simply: Problem solving leadership only acts towards solving any problem to enable the problem to be clearly and succinctly defined. Fanclubs and followers are eschewed, advice and suggestions towards clearly defining the problem are accepted based purely on merit of the suggestions, irrespective of individuals social-standing.

Parasitical Leeching Leadership generally choose some kind of ideology whereby they vaguely and ambiguously pretend to solve vague and abstract problems; while the predominant motive is to grow themselves a fan club/following, for their own socio-political or economic benefit. Their Parasite Leadership ‘problem solving’ deliberately avoids any focus on clearly defining any problem, or any investigation of the root cause of the problem. Their primary focus is to divert their fan clubs attention towards the symptoms of the problem, using emotional blame game language focussed on another Parasitical Leeching Leaders fan club. Such Parasitical Leeching leaders – like WWF Wrestlers – thereby entrench the Parasitical Leeching Leadership paradigm (Fake Left Wing v Right Wing Political Paradigm Explained1). Put differently: The bath is overflowing, Parasitical Leeching Leaders focus their fan club on endlessly mopping up the floor; who is mopping, who isn’t, etc. All attention towards defining the problem as the running tap is strictly avoided, including vilifying anyone who even mentions the possibility of a tap leaking being the source of the problem. The focus is to perpetuate the problem indefinitely while socio-politically exploiting the problem for personal gain, by means of manipulating the emotions of ‘followers’, related to the symptoms of the problem. Ninety-Nine percent of the worlds so-called ‘leadership’ is PARASITE LEECHING LEADERSHIP.

Survey Questions:

1. What is your Publication / Editorial definition of leadership?

2. Do you recognize the difference between Problem Solving Leadership and Parasitical Leeching Leadership?

3. Has your publication covered any individuals or organisations focussed on Problem Solving Leadership, and if so, a list of the articles that did so.

Respectfully Submitted,

Lara Johnstone Radical Honoursty SQ Worm Sosiety www.sqworms.co.nr

1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMPAfDHEFbQ

Radical Honoursty

P O Box 5042 George East, 6539

Tel: (071) 170 1954

FINANCIAL MAIL Editor: Mr. Duncan McLeod Dear Financial Mail Editor / Mr. McLeod,

Problem Solving Leadership Survey: Request for Information: Articles focussed on Problem Solving Leadership Individuals or Organisations I am in the process of researching Problem Solving Leadership, what it is, and is not; and how it is different from Parasite Leeching (Fake Problem Solving) Leadership. I am attempting to determine South African Media (Editors and Journalists) level of commitment, understanding, interest and reportage specifically focussed on Problem Solving leadership.

‘If I had one hour to save the world I would spend fifty-five minutes defining the problem and only five minutes finding the solution.’ – Albert Einstein

Definition / Put Simply: Problem solving leadership only acts towards solving any problem to enable the problem to be clearly and succinctly defined. Fanclubs and followers are eschewed, advice and suggestions towards clearly defining the problem are accepted based purely on merit of the suggestions, irrespective of individuals social-standing.

Parasitical Leeching Leadership generally choose some kind of ideology whereby they vaguely and ambiguously pretend to solve vague and abstract problems; while the predominant motive is to grow themselves a fan club/following, for their own socio-political or economic benefit. Their Parasite Leadership ‘problem solving’ deliberately avoids any focus on clearly defining any problem, or any investigation of the root cause of the problem. Their primary focus is to divert their fan clubs attention towards the symptoms of the problem, using emotional blame game language focussed on another Parasitical Leeching Leaders fan club. Such Parasitical Leeching leaders – like WWF Wrestlers – thereby entrench the Parasitical Leeching Leadership paradigm (Fake Left Wing v Right Wing Political Paradigm Explained1). Put differently: The bath is overflowing, Parasitical Leeching Leaders focus their fan club on endlessly mopping up the floor; who is mopping, who isn’t, etc. All attention towards defining the problem as the running tap is strictly avoided, including vilifying anyone who even mentions the possibility of a tap leaking being the source of the problem. The focus is to perpetuate the problem indefinitely while socio-politically exploiting the problem for personal gain, by means of manipulating the emotions of ‘followers’, related to the symptoms of the problem. Ninety-Nine percent of the worlds so-called ‘leadership’ is PARASITE LEECHING LEADERSHIP.

Survey Questions:

1. What is your Publication / Editorial definition of leadership?

2. Do you recognize the difference between Problem Solving Leadership and Parasitical Leeching Leadership?

3. Has your publication covered any individuals or organisations focussed on Problem Solving Leadership, and if so, a list of the articles that did so.

Respectfully Submitted,

Lara Johnstone Radical Honoursty SQ Worm Sosiety www.sqworms.co.nr

1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMPAfDHEFbQ

Radical Honoursty

P O Box 5042 George East, 6539

Tel: (071) 170 1954

FARMERS WEEKLY Producer: Mr. Chris Clugston Dear Farmers Weekly / Mr. Chris Clugston,

Problem Solving Leadership Survey: Request for Information: Articles focussed on Problem Solving Leadership Individuals or Organisations I am in the process of researching Problem Solving Leadership, what it is, and is not; and how it is different from Parasite Leeching (Fake Problem Solving) Leadership. I am attempting to determine South African Media (Editors and Journalists) level of commitment, understanding, interest and reportage specifically focussed on Problem Solving leadership.

‘If I had one hour to save the world I would spend fifty-five minutes defining the problem and only five minutes finding the solution.’ – Albert Einstein

Definition / Put Simply: Problem solving leadership only acts towards solving any problem to enable the problem to be clearly and succinctly defined. Fanclubs and followers are eschewed, advice and suggestions towards clearly defining the problem are accepted based purely on merit of the suggestions, irrespective of individuals social-standing.

Parasitical Leeching Leadership generally choose some kind of ideology whereby they vaguely and ambiguously pretend to solve vague and abstract problems; while the predominant motive is to grow themselves a fan club/following, for their own socio-political or economic benefit. Their Parasite Leadership ‘problem solving’ deliberately avoids any focus on clearly defining any problem, or any investigation of the root cause of the problem. Their primary focus is to divert their fan clubs attention towards the symptoms of the problem, using emotional blame game language focussed on another Parasitical Leeching Leaders fan club. Such Parasitical Leeching leaders – like WWF Wrestlers – thereby entrench the Parasitical Leeching Leadership paradigm (Fake Left Wing v Right Wing Political Paradigm Explained1). Put differently: The bath is overflowing, Parasitical Leeching Leaders focus their fan club on endlessly mopping up the floor; who is mopping, who isn’t, etc. All attention towards defining the problem as the running tap is strictly avoided, including vilifying anyone who even mentions the possibility of a tap leaking being the source of the problem. The focus is to perpetuate the problem indefinitely while socio-politically exploiting the problem for personal gain, by means of manipulating the emotions of ‘followers’, related to the symptoms of the problem. Ninety-Nine percent of the worlds so-called ‘leadership’ is PARASITE LEECHING LEADERSHIP.

Survey Questions:

1. What is your Publication / Editorial definition of leadership?

2. Do you recognize the difference between Problem Solving Leadership and Parasitical Leeching Leadership?

3. Has your publication covered any individuals or organisations focussed on Problem Solving Leadership, and if so, a list of the articles that did so.

Respectfully Submitted,

Lara Johnstone Radical Honoursty SQ Worm Sosiety www.sqworms.co.nr

1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMPAfDHEFbQ

Radical Honoursty

P O Box 5042 George East, 6539

Tel: (071) 170 1954

GEORGE HERALD Editor: Ms. Mandi Botha Dear George Herald Editor / Ms. Mandi Botha,

Problem Solving Leadership Survey: Request for Information: Articles focussed on Problem Solving Leadership Individuals or Organisations I am in the process of researching Problem Solving Leadership, what it is, and is not; and how it is different from Parasite Leeching (Fake Problem Solving) Leadership. I am attempting to determine South African Media (Editors and Journalists) level of commitment, understanding, interest and reportage specifically focussed on Problem Solving leadership.

‘If I had one hour to save the world I would spend fifty-five minutes defining the problem and only five minutes finding the solution.’ – Albert Einstein

Definition / Put Simply: Problem solving leadership only acts towards solving any problem to enable the problem to be clearly and succinctly defined. Fanclubs and followers are eschewed, advice and suggestions towards clearly defining the problem are accepted based purely on merit of the suggestions, irrespective of individuals social-standing.

Parasitical Leeching Leadership generally choose some kind of ideology whereby they vaguely and ambiguously pretend to solve vague and abstract problems; while the predominant motive is to grow themselves a fan club/following, for their own socio-political or economic benefit. Their Parasite Leadership ‘problem solving’ deliberately avoids any focus on clearly defining any problem, or any investigation of the root cause of the problem. Their primary focus is to divert their fan clubs attention towards the symptoms of the problem, using emotional blame game language focussed on another Parasitical Leeching Leaders fan club. Such Parasitical Leeching leaders – like WWF Wrestlers – thereby entrench the Parasitical Leeching Leadership paradigm (Fake Left Wing v Right Wing Political Paradigm Explained1). Put differently: The bath is overflowing, Parasitical Leeching Leaders focus their fan club on endlessly mopping up the floor; who is mopping, who isn’t, etc. All attention towards defining the problem as the running tap is strictly avoided, including vilifying anyone who even mentions the possibility of a tap leaking being the source of the problem. The focus is to perpetuate the problem indefinitely while socio-politically exploiting the problem for personal gain, by means of manipulating the emotions of ‘followers’, related to the symptoms of the problem. Ninety-Nine percent of the worlds so-called ‘leadership’ is PARASITE LEECHING LEADERSHIP.

Survey Questions:

1. What is your Publication / Editorial definition of leadership?

2. Do you recognize the difference between Problem Solving Leadership and Parasitical Leeching Leadership?

3. Has your publication covered any individuals or organisations focussed on Problem Solving Leadership, and if so, a list of the articles that did so.

Respectfully Submitted,

Lara Johnstone Radical Honoursty SQ Worm Sosiety www.sqworms.co.nr

1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMPAfDHEFbQ

Radical Honoursty

P O Box 5042 George East, 6539

Tel: (071) 170 1954

THE HERALD Editor: Ms. Heather Robertson Dear Herald Editor / Ms. Heather Robertson,

Problem Solving Leadership Survey: Request for Information: Articles focussed on Problem Solving Leadership Individuals or Organisations I am in the process of researching Problem Solving Leadership, what it is, and is not; and how it is different from Parasite Leeching (Fake Problem Solving) Leadership. I am attempting to determine South African Media (Editors and Journalists) level of commitment, understanding, interest and reportage specifically focussed on Problem Solving leadership.

‘If I had one hour to save the world I would spend fifty-five minutes defining the problem and only five minutes finding the solution.’ – Albert Einstein

Definition / Put Simply: Problem solving leadership only acts towards solving any problem to enable the problem to be clearly and succinctly defined. Fanclubs and followers are eschewed, advice and suggestions towards clearly defining the problem are accepted based purely on merit of the suggestions, irrespective of individuals social-standing.

Parasitical Leeching Leadership generally choose some kind of ideology whereby they vaguely and ambiguously pretend to solve vague and abstract problems; while the predominant motive is to grow themselves a fan club/following, for their own socio-political or economic benefit. Their Parasite Leadership ‘problem solving’ deliberately avoids any focus on clearly defining any problem, or any investigation of the root cause of the problem. Their primary focus is to divert their fan clubs attention towards the symptoms of the problem, using emotional blame game language focussed on another Parasitical Leeching Leaders fan club. Such Parasitical Leeching leaders – like WWF Wrestlers – thereby entrench the Parasitical Leeching Leadership paradigm (Fake Left Wing v Right Wing Political Paradigm Explained1). Put differently: The bath is overflowing, Parasitical Leeching Leaders focus their fan club on endlessly mopping up the floor; who is mopping, who isn’t, etc. All attention towards defining the problem as the running tap is strictly avoided, including vilifying anyone who even mentions the possibility of a tap leaking being the source of the problem. The focus is to perpetuate the problem indefinitely while socio-politically exploiting the problem for personal gain, by means of manipulating the emotions of ‘followers’, related to the symptoms of the problem. Ninety-Nine percent of the worlds so-called ‘leadership’ is PARASITE LEECHING LEADERSHIP.

Survey Questions:

1. What is your Publication / Editorial definition of leadership?

2. Do you recognize the difference between Problem Solving Leadership and Parasitical Leeching Leadership?

3. Has your publication covered any individuals or organisations focussed on Problem Solving Leadership, and if so, a list of the articles that did so.

Respectfully Submitted,

Lara Johnstone Radical Honoursty SQ Worm Sosiety www.sqworms.co.nr

1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMPAfDHEFbQ

Radical Honoursty

P O Box 5042 George East, 6539

Tel: (071) 170 1954

THE IND. ON SATURDAY Editor: Mr. Trevor Bruce Dear Ind. on Saturday Editor / Mr. Trevor Bruce,

Problem Solving Leadership Survey: Request for Information: Articles focussed on Problem Solving Leadership Individuals or Organisations I am in the process of researching Problem Solving Leadership, what it is, and is not; and how it is different from Parasite Leeching (Fake Problem Solving) Leadership. I am attempting to determine South African Media (Editors and Journalists) level of commitment, understanding, interest and reportage specifically focussed on Problem Solving leadership.

‘If I had one hour to save the world I would spend fifty-five minutes defining the problem and only five minutes finding the solution.’ – Albert Einstein

Definition / Put Simply: Problem solving leadership only acts towards solving any problem to enable the problem to be clearly and succinctly defined. Fanclubs and followers are eschewed, advice and suggestions towards clearly defining the problem are accepted based purely on merit of the suggestions, irrespective of individuals social-standing.

Parasitical Leeching Leadership generally choose some kind of ideology whereby they vaguely and ambiguously pretend to solve vague and abstract problems; while the predominant motive is to grow themselves a fan club/following, for their own socio-political or economic benefit. Their Parasite Leadership ‘problem solving’ deliberately avoids any focus on clearly defining any problem, or any investigation of the root cause of the problem. Their primary focus is to divert their fan clubs attention towards the symptoms of the problem, using emotional blame game language focussed on another Parasitical Leeching Leaders fan club. Such Parasitical Leeching leaders – like WWF Wrestlers – thereby entrench the Parasitical Leeching Leadership paradigm (Fake Left Wing v Right Wing Political Paradigm Explained1). Put differently: The bath is overflowing, Parasitical Leeching Leaders focus their fan club on endlessly mopping up the floor; who is mopping, who isn’t, etc. All attention towards defining the problem as the running tap is strictly avoided, including vilifying anyone who even mentions the possibility of a tap leaking being the source of the problem. The focus is to perpetuate the problem indefinitely while socio-politically exploiting the problem for personal gain, by means of manipulating the emotions of ‘followers’, related to the symptoms of the problem. Ninety-Nine percent of the worlds so-called ‘leadership’ is PARASITE LEECHING LEADERSHIP.

Survey Questions:

1. What is your Publication / Editorial definition of leadership?

2. Do you recognize the difference between Problem Solving Leadership and Parasitical Leeching Leadership?

3. Has your publication covered any individuals or organisations focussed on Problem Solving Leadership, and if so, a list of the articles that did so.

Respectfully Submitted,

Lara Johnstone Radical Honoursty SQ Worm Sosiety www.sqworms.co.nr

1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMPAfDHEFbQ

Radical Honoursty

P O Box 5042 George East, 6539

Tel: (071) 170 1954

LEADERSHIP ONLINE Editor: Mr. Piet Coertze Dear Leadership Online / Mr. Piet Coertze,

Problem Solving Leadership Survey: Request for Information: Articles focussed on Problem Solving Leadership Individuals or Organisations I am in the process of researching Problem Solving Leadership, what it is, and is not; and how it is different from Parasite Leeching (Fake Problem Solving) Leadership. I am attempting to determine South African Media (Editors and Journalists) level of commitment, understanding, interest and reportage specifically focussed on Problem Solving leadership.

‘If I had one hour to save the world I would spend fifty-five minutes defining the problem and only five minutes finding the solution.’ – Albert Einstein

Definition / Put Simply: Problem solving leadership only acts towards solving any problem to enable the problem to be clearly and succinctly defined. Fanclubs and followers are eschewed, advice and suggestions towards clearly defining the problem are accepted based purely on merit of the suggestions, irrespective of individuals social-standing.

Parasitical Leeching Leadership generally choose some kind of ideology whereby they vaguely and ambiguously pretend to solve vague and abstract problems; while the predominant motive is to grow themselves a fan club/following, for their own socio-political or economic benefit. Their Parasite Leadership ‘problem solving’ deliberately avoids any focus on clearly defining any problem, or any investigation of the root cause of the problem. Their primary focus is to divert their fan clubs attention towards the symptoms of the problem, using emotional blame game language focussed on another Parasitical Leeching Leaders fan club. Such Parasitical Leeching leaders – like WWF Wrestlers – thereby entrench the Parasitical Leeching Leadership paradigm (Fake Left Wing v Right Wing Political Paradigm Explained1). Put differently: The bath is overflowing, Parasitical Leeching Leaders focus their fan club on endlessly mopping up the floor; who is mopping, who isn’t, etc. All attention towards defining the problem as the running tap is strictly avoided, including vilifying anyone who even mentions the possibility of a tap leaking being the source of the problem. The focus is to perpetuate the problem indefinitely while socio-politically exploiting the problem for personal gain, by means of manipulating the emotions of ‘followers’, related to the symptoms of the problem. Ninety-Nine percent of the worlds so-called ‘leadership’ is PARASITE LEECHING LEADERSHIP.

Survey Questions:

1. What is your Publication / Editorial definition of leadership?

2. Do you recognize the difference between Problem Solving Leadership and Parasitical Leeching Leadership?

3. Has your publication covered any individuals or organisations focussed on Problem Solving Leadership, and if so, a list of the articles that did so.

Respectfully Submitted,

Lara Johnstone Radical Honoursty SQ Worm Sosiety www.sqworms.co.nr

1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMPAfDHEFbQ