14-08-07 samsung filing on office action in reexamination of apple's '172 patent

8/12/2019 14-08-07 Samsung Filing on Office Action in Reexamination of Apple's '172 Patent

1/58

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 12-CV-00630-LHK

STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION L.R. 7-3 d

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &SULLIVAN, LLPCharles K. Verhoeven (Bar No. 170151)[email protected] A. Smith (Bar No. 250814)[email protected]

50 California Street, 22nd FloorSan Francisco, California 94111Telephone: (415) 875-6600Facsimile: (415) 875-6700

Kevin P.B. Johnson (Bar No. 177129)[email protected] F. Maroulis (Bar No. 202603)[email protected] Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th FloorRedwood Shores, California 94065Telephone: (650) 801-5000Facsimile: (650) 801-5100

William C. Price (Bar No. 108542)[email protected] L. Fazio (Bar No. 228601)[email protected] South Figueroa Street, 10th FloorLos Angeles, California 90017-2543Telephone: (213) 443-3000Facsimile: 213 443-3100

Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,INC. and SAMSUNGTELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION

APPLE INC., a California corporation,

Plaintiff,

vs.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., aKorean business entity; SAMSUNGELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a NewYork corporation; SAMSUNGTELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,

Defendants.

CASE NO. 12-CV-00630-LHK

STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION(L.R. 7-3(d))

Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951 Filed08/07/14 Page1 of 2


2/58

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2- Case No. 12-CV-00630-LHKSTATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION L.R. 7-3 d

Pursuant to Local Rule 7-3(d), Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung

Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively

Samsung) bring to the Courts attention an Office Action by the United States Patent and

Trademark Office (USPTO) in the ex partereexamination of U.S. Patent Number 8,074,172 (the

172 patent) dated August 5, 2014. This Office Action is relevant to Samsungs invalidity

defenses for the 172 patent, as described in Samsungs Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law

(Dkt. 1896-3, Section III) because the USPTO concluded that the prior art identified in the Office

Action is the same or in the same family as the prior art asserted by Samsung in this case. The

Office Action concluded that U.S. Patent Number 6,801,190 (Robinson) and International

Patent Number WO 2005/008899 (Ng/Xrgomics) anticipate claim 18 of the 172 patent. To

the best of Samsungs knowledge, this Office Action was published on the USPTOs Patent

Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) website on August 5, 2014. A copy of the Decision on

Petition is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

DATED: August 7, 2014 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &

SULLIVAN, LLP

By/s/ Patrick Curran

Charles K. VerhoevenKevin P.B. Johnson

Victoria F. Maroulis

Michael T. ZellerAttorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,

LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,

INC., and SAMSUNG

TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC

Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951 Filed08/07/14 Page2 of 2


3/58

Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page1 of 56


4/58



5/58



6/58



7/58


8/58



9/58



10/58



11/58



12/58



13/58



14/58



15/58



16/58



17/58



18/58



19/58



20/58



21/58



22/58



23/58



24/58



25/58



26/58



27/58



28/58



29/58



30/58



31/58



32/58



33/58



34/58



35/58



36/58



37/58



38/58



39/58



40/58



41/58



42/58



43/58



44/58


45/58



46/58



47/58



48/58



49/58



50/58


51/58


52/58



53/58



54/58



55/58



56/58



57/58



58/58


14-08-07 samsung filing on office action in reexamination of apple's '172 patent

Documents