14-1 passive smoking healthcare workers need to know about the effects of both active and passive...
TRANSCRIPT
14-1Passive smoking
Passive smoking
Healthcare
workers need to
know about the
effects of both
active and
passive smoking.
14-2Passive smoking
Streams of tobacco fume
Lateral stream or second hand
Main streamSmoker
Third stream
14-3Passive smoking
Tobacco smoke : Gas phaseType of toxicity
Amount in main stream / cig.
Ratio second/main stream
Carbon monoxid Toxic 26,8-61 mg 2,5-14,9
Benzene Carcinogen 400-500 µg 8-10.
Formaldehyde Carcinogen 1 500 µg 50
3-Vinylpyridine Suspected Carcinogen
300-450 µg 24-34
Hydrogen Cyanide Toxic 14-110 g 0, 06-0,4
Hydrazine Suspect Carcinogen
90 ng 3
Azote oxides (NOx) Toxic 500-2 000 µg 3,7-12,8
N-nitrosodimethylamine Suspect Carcinogen
200-1040 ng 20-130
N-nitrosopyrrolidine Suspect Carcinogen
30-390 ng 6-120
14-4Passive smoking
Particular phase
7,20, 72 µgCancerogenCadmium
1,243 ngSuspect CancerogenN-nitrosodiéthanolamine
1-220,2-1,4 µgSuspect Cancerogennor nitrosocotinine
0,5-50,15-1,7 µgSuspect CancerogenN-nitrosonornicotine
8-1115-20 µgCancerogenQuinoléine
2,5-2040-70 ngCancerogenBenzo(a)pyrene
2-440-200 ngCancerogenBenz(a)anthracene
3,1140 ngCancerogen4-Aminobiphenyl
3970 ngCancerogen2-Naphthylamine
18,73 µgCancerogenO-Toluidine
0,67-12,858-290 µgSuspect CancerogenCatechol
1,3-370-250 µgPromotorPhenol
1,3-212,1-46 mgToxicNicotine
1,1-15,714-30 mgCancerogenTars
Ratio second hand/ main stream
Amount in main stream / cig
toxicity
14-5Passive smoking
Discomfort from passive smoking is a reality
• Recent survey (Baromètre santé 2000) showed than 72 % of non-smokers are disturbed by second hand tobacco.
• These results demonstrate the need for non smokers to be totally protected from second hand tobacco.
• NB 53% of smokers also stated that they were disturbed by second hand tobacco. The request for a smoke-free environment is well accept by both non-smokers and smokers alike.
14-6Passive smoking
Discomfort from passive smoking in Europe
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
BelgiumDenmark
GermanyGreece
SpainFrance
EireItaly
LuxemburgNederland
PortugalUK
Sources: Europe against cancer, 1993 and WHO Europe, 1992.
Disturbance % smokers
14-7Passive smoking
Disturbance from passive smoking report by smokersin response to the question :
«are you disturbed by smoke from others? »
33,2 39,4 45,4 47,558,1 65,3
40,244,2
42,7 40,932,5 25,7
26,616,4 11,9 11,7 9,4 9
0
20
40
60
80
100 %
<1 cig/d 1 - 5cig/d
6 - 10cig/d
11 - 15cig/d
16 - 20cig/d
> 20cig/d
Not at all Yes, little Yes, stronglySource: Baromètre santé 2000, CFES
14-8Passive smoking
Exposure to tobacco smoke
Exposure to tobacco smoke in Europe (%)
86
85
82
63
55
43
84
82
78
56
54
40
0 20 40 60 80 100 %
Restaurants
Friends
Public place
Transports
Working place
At home 1995
1992
Eurobaromètre 1995 (12 european states)
14-9Passive smoking
Recent scientific data demonstrates the risk of second hand smoking for non-smokers.
• Smokers are the main victims of tobacco smoke (500 000 deaths annually in Europe)
• Recent scientific data, mainly published within last 15 years, provides clear evidence than second hand tobacco smoke is the cause of disease in children and adults.
• This evidence calls for responsible action in public places to prevent all exposure to second hand tobacco smoke.
14-10Passive smoking
Second hand tobacco smoke is associate with an increase risk of :
Lower tract respiratory infections in children (+ 72 % if mother smokes),
recurrent otitis media in children (+48 % if both parents smoke),
asthma attack and shyness in children,
intra-uterin growth defects and low birth weight (also occurs in non smoking mothers passively exposed to second hand tobacco),
suddent infant death (two fold increase)
Heart attack (+25 %, it is the main cause of second hand related death)
lung cancer (+ 26 %).
Apart from these well established effects, many other effects are suspected with regard to non malignant diseases and the aggravation of pre-existing conditions or malignous diseases, however new scientific data is needed to confirm these effects.
14-11Passive smoking
Cardiac disease (coronary disease)• Three meta-analysis including more than 25 epidemiologic studies
demonstrates that second hand smoke exposure is associate to an excess of coronary disease (angina and myocardial infarction).
• This effect is established for non-smokers exposed at home or in the working place.
• Biological data explains this excess of risk.
• The risk decreases when exposure stops.
• A dose/response relationship exists.
• The best estimate of this risk excess as compared to non exposed person is 25%.
• Because of the number of people concerned, cardiac risk is the main risk of mortality with regard to second hand tobacco exposure.
14-12Passive smoking
Lung carcinoma
• More than 40 epidemiological surveys included in 3 meta-analysis established that second hand tobacco is associated with an increase in lung carcinoma (25%).
• This effect is demonstrated in non-smokers exposed at home and in the working place.
• A dose/response relationship exists.
• The best estimate of risk as compared to a non exposed person is 26%.
14-13Passive smoking
Lung carcinomaIncreased risk 26%
Heart attacks25%
Disturbance Increase risk80 % for non-smokers 53% for smokers.
Two main risks of passive smoking in adults, in addition to those in pregnancy)
14-14Passive smoking
BronchitisIncreased risk of 72 % for a smoking mother and 29 % if an other family member smokes
Suddent infant death2 fold increased risk
Otitis media
Increased risk of 21%, 38% or 48 % according to whether father, mother or both are smokers
Asthma attack
Increased risk of 14%, 38% or 48% according whether father, mother or both are smokers
The four main risks of passive smoking in children
14-15Passive smoking
Number of workers exposed to respiratory carcinogens in France.
1162464
523971
410499
375461
307025
177949
0 200000 400000 600000 800000 1000000 1200000 1400000
Second hand tobacco smoke. (>75% of working time)
Radon and degradation product
Diesel exhaust fumes
Inorganic acid mists(sulf. ac. )
Formaldehyde
Wood dust
Source : CAREX
14-16Passive smoking
Percentage of people who report that non smokers are protect from second hand tobacco (%)
1993-1994 CFES
1995 CFES 1998 CREDOC
2000 CFES
Workplaces 53,8 56,8 61,9 60,3Transports 53,7 40,1 56,1 45,7Restaurants 36,1 44 40,1 41,2Bars 12,1 17,2 - 13,2Railway and undergrounds
- - 26,9 -
Public places in general 37,2 43,9 - 31,5
School, university 50,8
14-17Passive smoking
Indoor tobacco pollutionCompound Typical value in
clean areaSmoking room Limit value for pollution in
city
CO < 1 ppm 10 ppm 16mg/m3 (14,5 ppm) plan to decrease to 10mg/m3
(8,5 ppm) at /1/2005
Cotinine 0,34 ± 0,007 µg/m3 3,74 ± 0,52 µg/m3
Nicotine < 0,3 g/m3 1-10 g/m3 < limit of detection
Particul mater < 1 m (MMAD)
10-25 g/m3 18-95 g/m3 5000 g/m3 respirable USA
Benzene 3,6 g/m3 7,2 g/m3 10 g/m3 decreasing to 5 g/m3 at 1/1/2010
14-18Passive smoking
Decrease of nicotine in air according to tobacco control regulation
Source : Trout D, J Occup Environ Med 1998; 40:270-6 Hammond SK, JAMA 1995; 274:956-60
8,6
1,30,3
2,3
0,70,2
0
2
4
6
8
10
No policies Non-smoking area Non-smoking casino
nic
oti
ne
in a
ir (
mcg
/m3)
casino
Others workplaces
14-19Passive smoking
Benefit to employees of smoking prohibition in restaurants
Eisner M et coll., JAMA 1998, 280, 1909-1914
Nu
mb
e r o
f b
arm
en w
ith
sy m
pto
ms
Source:
10
20
30
40
Before prohibition After prohibition0
Symptoms in 67 barmen before and after smoking prohibition
DyspneaMorning coughDay coughSputumEyes irritationNose irritation
Throat irritation
,
14-20Passive smoking
Biological monitoring of passive smoking
39621,5 ± 28,77,47 ± 8,25Urinary (ng/ml)
2,49Plasmaic (ng/ml)
150,6 ± 15510–43,65,8 ± 4,35Nicotine Salive (ng/ml)
30Urin. (ng/mg creat.)
3 – 68100–2500,3 – 392Urinary (ng/ml)
15 –7,33undetectableundetectablePlasmatic (ng/ml)
0 – 83,6 – 31,30,4Salive (ng/ml)
Cotinine
RIACGRIACGRIACG
> 5 %2-3 %> 1,7 %HbCO
>10–20 ppm7–11 ppm3 ppm ± 1,5C0
smokerexposedNon-exposedCompound
CG = Gazeous chromatography RIA = radio-immuno-assay