14 cancer questions

8/12/2019 14 Cancer Questions

1/43


2/43

Question #1:If there were cures for cancer in Mother Nature, wouldn't the mass mediatell me about these cures?

Answer #1:Consider the words to this popular hit song:

And when you trust your televisionWhat you get is what you gotCause when they own the informationOh, they can bend it all they wantJohn Mayer: "Waiting on the World to Change"

Think of the media as a handful of giant corporations which generate massive amountsof revenue and profits by selling things for other giant corporations. It is a "good oldboys" club. The goal of the media is to make money, and lots of it.

Their money comes primarily from their advertisers. This means they have a hugeloyaltyto their advertisers. But that is not all. There is a lot of cross-ownership betweenthe media and the giant corporations which advertise in the media. It is literally abrotherhood.

One of the biggest advertising clients of the television industry is the pharmaceuticalindustry. The pharmaceutical industry pumps billions of dollars into the major mediaevery year. Have you ever seen a news program that did not show at least onepharmaceutical ad?

On the other hand, Mother Nature doesn't have a checkbook, so the media doesn't get

any money from Mother Nature. Thus, "Big Pharma" (i.e. the pharmaceutical industry)pays the media billions of dollars, every year, more than Mother Nature pays. Do youthink that that much money would influence what you see and hear on television??This is a quote from a famous journalist in the 1880s after he retired from thenewspaper business. He is speaking to other journalists:

"We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are thejumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, ourpossibilities and our lives are all the property of other men. We areintellectual prostitutes."John Swinton (1829-1901) pre-eminent New York journalist & head

of the editorial staff at the New York Tribune. Quoted one nightbetween 1880-1883.Quoted by Upton Sinclair in his 1919 book:The Brass Check: A Study of American Journalism, page 400Even though Upton Sinclair was famous by 1919, because he wascriticizing corruption in the media, the media would not support hisbook and he had to self-publish.


3/43

The key phrase in this quote is "rich men behind the scenes." The richest and mostcorrupt people on this planet let the politicians have the publicity; they are onlyinterested in money and power and like to stay in the background.In fact, many of them spend millions of dollars a year hiring full-time staffs to providethem good public images, even though most of them avoid publicity themselves.The politicians are more than happy to get the glory of the world, get rich, and do whatthey are told to do.

Absolutely nothing has changed since the 1880s except that the tactics of the mediahave become far more effective than they used to be.

If the media were to tell the general public that carrot juice and a special diet(as one ofmany examples) can cure many cases of newly diagnosed cancer, the pharmaceuticalindustry would lose billions of dollars every year in revenues. And the media wouldultimately lose billions of dollars in revenues. And many people would survive theircancer!!

The truth will never be told because the media has always sold their opinions to thehighest bidder and has always been controlled by the ultra-wealthy who lust after evengreater fortunes.

The media makes billions of dollars every year by totally blacklistinginformation aboutalternative medicine. By blacklisting alternative medicine, people assume thatprescription drugs are far more effective against cancer than natural substancesbecause they trust what they see on television.

It is a highly profitable deception which takes advantage of people's assumptions andtrust. As John Mayer said: when you trust your television (i.e. giant corporations): "What

you get is what you got."

What people trust is ultra-wealthy businessmen; notMother Nature.

The more the media can convince the general public that there are no cures for cancerin Mother Nature, the more people will run to their doctor to get drugs when they getsickand thus the more money the pharmaceutical industry will makeand the moremoney the ultra-wealthy will make, and the more money the media will make!!!

Ponder that carefully because that is the precise reason you know absolutely nothingtruthful about the more than 600 cancer treatments in Mother Nature!!

By blacklisting the truth about alternative medicine, the media forges a strongrelationship with the pharmaceutical industry that results in billions of dollars in revenueevery year by selling advertisements to the drug industry.

The truth is that the medical cartel, the media, the pharmaceutical industry, and sometypes of chemical companies, have no more integrity than the tobacco industry, whichknew in the 1930s that tobacco caused lung cancer. The tobacco industry tried for


4/43

many years to cover-up the obvious truth that tobacco caused lung cancer.It wasn't the media, the President, the Congress, the Food and Drug Administration orthe other federal agencies that brought down the tobacco industry; it was the state ofMinnesota.

The media, the medical cartel, almost every government on earth, ad nauseum,continue to totally blacklist the truth about alternative cancer treatments because thereis no money in telling the truth.


5/43

Question #2:Why do television shows glorify medical doctors so much?

Answer #2:They glorify medical doctors because real medical doctors are the oneswho prescribe the drugs that are sold by their advertisers. In other words, they glorifymedical doctors because their advertisers want them to.

Because the media glorifies medical doctors on their television shows, when someonegets cancer, or any other serious disease, they immediately head for their doctor'sofficebecause television has conditioned them. Then they buy prescription drugs by thebucket. Do you see the connection?

The problem is not so much that what the media says is false; the bigger problem is thatthe media does not tell you the whole story. This is called blacklisting. What the mediatells you is like a puzzle with half of the pieces missing.

You would not believe how fanatical the media is that NO MENTION of the missingpieces ever gets on the air!! The main job of "producers" is to make sure none of themissing pieces is ever discussed.

They don't tell you both sides of the story, they only tell you one side of the story- the most profitable side. They blacklist the other side of the story. This leads toassumptions by the general public and these assumptions are precisely what thepharmaceutical industry and media want people to make.

These puzzle pieces are missing by careful design!! The fact that there are cures forcancer, AIDS, malaria and many other diseases are just some of the many missingpieces. Many of the missing pieces have nothing to do with medicine.

Watching the media is more like watching a carefully directed play with professionalactors than it is watching a group of people looking to uncover the real truth.

Because the media says nothing about alternative medicine, the general publicautomatically believes that alternative medicine is useless. Blacklisting is an incrediblypowerful brainwashing tool!!

Neither Pavlov, nor Hitler's brainwashing machine, were in the same league as today'smodern media at manipulating the minds of the public. The media has mastered the artof suppressing the things they do not want the public to hear without the public even

knowing anything important is missing!!

And that is the key. The general public has absolutely no clue that massively importantfacts, life-saving facts, are intentionally missing from their television sets. The powersthat be do not want the "worthless eaters," as they call us, to know their options.

"No one understood better than Stalin that the true object ofpropaganda is neither to convince nor even to persuade, but to


6/43

produce a uniform pattern of public utterancein which the first traceof unorthodox thought immediately reveals itself as ajarringdissonance."

Alan Bullock, Hitler and Stalin: Parallel Lives

Has the media created a "uniform pattern of public utterance?" The truth is that morethan 99% of all Americans, when they are first diagnosed with cancer, run to theirmedical doctor to use chemotherapy, radiation and surgery!! Americans can't beslashed, burned and poisoned fast enough.

Now thatis a "uniform pattern of public utterance," especially considering that MotherNature's cancer treatments are far, far more effective than those of orthodox medicine!!Furthermore, whenever I tell someone that modern medicine is totally corrupt and thatMother Nature can cure cancer, they look at me as if I had just escaped from a mentalinstitution!! That is an example of the "jarring dissonance" created by the "uniformpattern of public utterance" created by the media!!

The media has achieved this "uniform pattern of public utterance," notby attackingalternative medicine, but by uniformly and universally blacklisting it.

The media has created a fantasyland of false information which does not exist in thereal world, but by using enough repetition it has become "reality" to those who arehypnotized by its propaganda.

Isn't that the definition of "brainwashed?"

This is exactly how all dictators gain control of their subjects. They control everythingthe public hears and everything the public hears is a carefully orchestrated fantasy of

deceit.

But the key is absolute and total control over what people hear. Any conflicting voicemust be totally shut down and blocked out of the media. Hitler had people tortured andexecuted for handing out pamphlets which were critical of what he was doing.

Some people think the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) exists to guaranteefreedom of speech in America. Nothing could be further from the truth. The FCC existsto crushfreedom of speech. But you don't hear the truth about the FCC because themedia are puppets of the same "rich men behind the scenes" as the FCC!!

The media, medical cartel, etc. all have huge financial interests in keeping you sick aslong as possible. They have no interest in your survival!!

I have found it virtually impossible to convince anyone that Mother Nature is smarterthan their medical doctor. The media has created a nation of walking zombies who thinkthat God is too stupid to cure cancer.

If you want to know who the "rich men behind the scenes" are, read the book: Murder


7/43

By Injection -The Story of the Medical Conspiracy Against America, by Mr. EustaceMullins, 1988


8/43

Question #3:Can Mother Nature's "natural cancer treatments" really cure cancer?

Answer #3:The late Dr. William D. Kelley, a dentist by training, and probably someoneyou have never heard of, used natural cancer treatments to treat more than 33,000cancer patients.

Dr. Kelley used special diets, proteolytic enzymes, and other natural substances. Hewas able to cure more than 90%of the newly diagnosed cancer patients who went tohim instead of "orthodox medicine" (i.e. chemotherapy, radiation, surgery, etc.).Compare Dr. Kelley's cure rate of 90% to the overall cure rate of less than 3% oforthodox medicine.

Dr. Kelley's treatments are well documented and are more than 30 times more effectivethan those of "modern medicine" which uses man-made molecules which can bepatented.

What is wrong with the medical community?They could have a 90% cure rate onnewly diagnosed cancer patients if they used the highly documented approach of Dr.Kelley.

But instead they use treatments from the pharmaceutical industry which have cure ratesof less than 1% for almost all kinds of cancer.

If the people in orthodox medicine were REALLY looking for cures for cancer theywould be looking in Mother Nature. They wouldn't have to look very far because thereare already hundreds of known cures for cancer in Mother Nature. All they have to do isask us and we will be happy to tell them all about these cures.

Don't believe orthodox medicine when they pretend they are "looking" for cures forcancer!!

The only thing they are looking for is more profitable treatments. They want to maximizetheir profits before the patient dies. Curing cancer will never be as profitable as treatingcancer as a chronic disease.

There are many reasons Mother Nature's treatments are far superior to those of BigMedicine. One reason is that scientists and medical doctors are not as smart, compared

to Mother Nature, as you might think they are. This makes perfect sense if you happento believe that God created Mother Nature's genius.

For example, no scientist in the world has the slightest clue how the algorithms, builtinto the nucleotides on our DNA, control the morphing of a fertilized egg, which has oneDNA strand, but morphs into a human baby who has 100 billion brain cells and 100trillionsynaptic connections which connect its brain cells!!


9/43

Furthermore, this brain morphs in the fetus at the same time the liver, heart, kidneys,arteries, toes, eyes, hair, etc. are morphing!! How this happens is far beyond the abilityof a human being to even remotely grasp. The same genius who designed DNA is thevery intelligence behind Mother Nature!!

"If the brain were simple enough to understand, we would be toosimple to understand it."Quoted in: Listening to Prozac by Peter D. Kramer

Do you think the being who designed DNA is smart enough to cure cancer??

Do our medical doctors (who don't use Mother Nature) cure cancer as well as the late

Dr. Kelley and many other experts in natural medicine? It's not even close.

Pieces of Dr. Kelley's protocol are frequency used in alternative cancer treatments, butthe entire protocol is rarely used because there are better treatments now.

While medical doctors do have intelligence, intelligence without integrity is the worstpossible combination. Medical doctors clearly have the intelligence to use MotherNature's cures for cancer, but they choose not to use them.

But to be fair to individual medical doctors, it should be mentioned that individualmedical doctors don't have the freedom that people may think they have. Our modernmedical establishment is so corruptthat if a medical doctor integrated a single treatmentof Mother Natureinto a cancer treatment (as opposed to using Mother Nature to treatsymptoms), they could lose their medical license!!

Think about that for a minute. Medical doctors are not even allowed to find out, diseaseby disease, whether natural treatments are more effective than worthless mutateddrugs!! They must always use worthless mutated drugs unless they are dealing with thesymptoms of disease.

It is "fish or cut bait" for individual medical doctors; meaning they have to chooseorthodox medicine or alternative medicine. There is nothing in between. Many medicaldoctors have switched to alternative medicine.

Oh, it gets worse. Just in case someone with integrity gets a position of power in theAMA (the American Medical Association, the labor union of medical doctors), or the

AMA loses a court case because of their corruption, the federal government can alsoyank a medical doctor's license.

Public Law 92-603 (i.e. PSRO), signed by President Nixon in 1972, authorizes agovernment agency, the Department of Health, Education and Welfare to create"standards" and yank the license of any medical doctor who does not obey these"standards."


10/43

The reason the medical cartel can persecute its own members is that Mother Nature is"unapproved" for treating cancer by the equally corrupt Food and Drug Administration.This does not mean Mother Nature does not know how to cure cancer, it only meansthat using Mother Nature's treatments are not profitable enough to satisfy the greed andcorruption of the medical cartel, Big Government and others who have their finger in thepie.

Big Pharma pays far better than Mother Nature. But that is because corruption in ourgovernment gives Big Pharma the right to "patent" their mutated molecules. More willbe said about patents in the next question.

When someone tells you that Mother Nature's cancer treatments are "unproven," justremember to translate the word "unproven" into the word: "unprofitable." MotherNature's cures are unprofitable because they cannot be patented plus they cure cancerinstead of creating a chronic patient.

The corruption which yields massive amounts of profits is the underlying trigger thatprevents the average person from knowing the truth about Mother Nature. It is patentsthat create massive profits for Big Pharma and it is these profits which controleverything you hear in the media, the government, the universities and at your doctor'soffice.

The fantasyland that the media, drug companies and medical cartel have painted wascarefully designed by many, many businessmen who lust after power and profits andwho couldn't care less about your health or life!! Mother Nature cares about your healthand life and has put hundreds of cures for cancer in her plants.


11/43

Question #4:Is the United States federal government totally corrupt or do they act inmy best interests?

Answer #4:Starting in roughly 1910 (when the Flaxner Report came out under theumbrella of Rockefeller and Carnegie), foundations (controlled by ultra-wealthy families)started controlling the medical schools by using "charitable contributions."

These tax-free foundations, which were really nothing more than a tax haven for theultra-rich, started forcing the medical schools, which they individually favored, to convertover to "modern medicine" (i.e. synthetic drugs).

At about the same time these same families also took over the "research" of theAmerican Medical Association.

It didn't take long before all medical "research" done at medical schools and the AMAwere "looking" solely for medical treatments which used synthetic drugs which could bepatented.

Furthermore, these cartels controlled who was on the faculty of these medical schoolsand thus all medical schools eventually converted over to teaching nothing but drugmedicine to their students. Natural medicine was totally dropped from their curriculum.Today, the average housewife knows more about natural medicine than the averagemedical doctor.

The U.S. Government was certainly no obstacle to the plans of Big Pharma and evenhanded the pharmaceutical industry its own police force (which is now called the FDA).In other words, the FDA is the police force for the pharmaceutical industry and the

chemical industry. The ubiquitous phrase "FDA Approved" means absolutely nothingabout the safety or effectiveness of a product. In fact, "FDA Approved" really means"Highly Profitable to the Pharmaceutical Industry."

The FDA has the police powers that the pharmaceutical industry needs and uses. TheFDA will do whatever the pharmaceutical industry tells it to do.

The FDA uses their police powers to proactively crush alternative medicine. The FDAhas shut down many medical clinics which were curing cancer. They have also jailedmany vendors of products which cured cancer. Many state governments have also shutdown clinics which were curing cancer.

This is actually a worldwide problem for alternative medicine. It seems that thegovernments of almost all nations have sold-out to pharmaceutical industry money. Forexample, the governments of Australia and Canada are just as corrupt as the UnitedStates. Only one nation in the world has "Freedom of Choice in Medicine" as part oftheir constitution.

In the United States the government has made it impossible for vendors of natural


12/43

substances to mount any competition against the pharmaceutical industry. They havedone this in several ways.

First, natural substances cannot be patented. Thus, vendors of natural substancescannot make very much money selling their products because they cannot create amonopoly generated by patents.

Second, vendors of natural substances cannot make any "medical claims" about theirproducts until they are "FDA Approved." However, due to a lack of profits because theycannot get patents and due to their inability to make truthful "medical claims," vendorsof natural substances cannot raise enough money to get "FDA Approval."

Vendors of natural substances are in a paradoxical situation, they need to have moneyto make money. Thus, only huge corporations (which will always be controlled by ultra-wealthy families, directly or indirectly, due to a wide variety of tactics) can get something"FDA Approved."

The cost of getting a substance "FDA Approved" is gigantic. This is not because theFDA cares about human life; it is partly to price the cost of getting "FDA Approval" out ofrange of any entity which is not controlled by the "ultra-wealthy."

To pamper the pharmaceutical industry, the FDA has prohibited vendors of naturalproducts from making medical claims about their products, even if those medical claimsare based on solid scientific evidenceand extensive testimonials.

So what if one of these vendors of natural products did have hundreds of millions ofdollars to get a product which cures cancer "FDA Approval?"

Not to worry, the FDA has rigged their regulatory process to make it impossible for anatural product, which cures cancer, to get FDA approval, no matter how much moneythey have.

The uniform behavior of Congress, the media, the FDA, ad nauseum, is notcoincidental. All of these entities are totally controlled by the same money pie. It seemsour government and media are nothing but whores who sell us out for personal profit.In summary, while the media blocks the general public from learning that alternativecancer treatments even exist, the job of the FDA is to block the general public fromhearing the truth from vendorsabout their products which can cure cancer. Plus theFDA has blocked the availabilityof many natural cancer treatments.

Congress and the White House, as always, are in the hip pocket of any industry withenough money to control them. They are like children looking for free candy.So what happens when the rich and famous get cancer? They will frequently go toGermany or some other country to get natural cancer treatments.Here is a quote from a medical doctor in Germany, who exclusively used natural cancertreatments, who treated many, many rich and famous people, including one president ofthe United States:


13/43

"You wouldnt believe how many FDA officials or relatives oracquaintances of FDA officials come to see me as patients inHanover. You wouldnt believe this, or directors of the AMA, or ACS[American Cancer Society], or the presidents of orthodox cancerinstitutes. Thats the fact."Hans Nieper M.D. (1928-1998 - Hanover, Germany)

But there is another reason the FDA makes sure that all alternative cancer treatmentsare rated as "unproven treatments." By rigging their regulations they allow the media,the corrupt charities (e.g. the American Cancer Society, and many others), the healthinsurance companies, etc. etc. to ignore and persecute alternative medicine.

I personally have communicated by email with thousandsof cancer patients. You wouldnot believe how many times I have seen someone write: "we just can't afford that[alternative cancer treatment]." These patients (or their health insurers) have givenhundreds of thousands of dollars to Big Medicine, but don't have $3,000 left forsomething that may cure them.

The health insurance companies will gladly plop down a quarter of a million dollars sosomeone can die of cancer, but they won't spend a dime for someone to get cured byMother Nature.

Mother Nature is not corrupt, orthodox medicine is corrupt. This is just one of the manytruths that people who are new to alternative medicine must get used to.

All of this is what makes the Cancer Tutor website (www.cancertutor.com), and othersuch websites, so important. Nothing is sold from this website, nor do I sell anythingfrom any other website.

On this website, in a few days, a person can go from knowing nothing about alternativemedicine, to understanding many of their options with alternative medicine. That isbecause this website has dozens of articles on highly effective alternative cancertreatments and related issues.

In other words, because I don't sell anything, I can make medical claims for productswhich the vendors cannot make. That is why it is so important that the reader study theCancer Tutor website in addition to the vendor websites (even though they cannot makemedical claims, they do provide some information).

Actually, the FDA works for the largepharmaceutical companies. For example, if asmall pharmaceutical company wants a highly effective drug to be approved, whichdrug would cut into the profits of the large pharmaceutical companies, the FDA mayharass this small company (such as by not approving their studies) until they "sell out"to the large pharmaceutical company or close their doors. If they choose to "sell out,"the large pharmaceutical company will almost certainly "bury" the treatment.

Some federal judges also seem to be on the payroll of the pharmaceutical industry.


14/43

When the FDA is persecuting people who know how to cure cancer, some federaljudges intentionally run "Kangaroo Courts" which will not allow the defense team toproduce evidence regarding the effectiveness of the product or device. Helping peoplesurvive deadly diseases is irrelevant to these judges, only their level in the court systemmatters to them.

Only the Internet still has some semblance of freedom of speech (as long as you arenot a vendor). However, the pharmaceutical industry controls so many large websitesthat even the Internet is largely useless to cancer patients.

But of far more importance is that because the media blacklists alternative medicine,people think alternative medicine is useless and they are not likely to search theInternet for alternative medicine websites. That is why people have to "stumble" acrosswebsites which speak the truth about alternative medicine.

Many "cancer researchers" are also in bed with Big Pharma. The National Institutes ofHeath, the National Cancer Institute, etc. all exist to pretendto look for cures for cancer,but it is also important that they pretend that curing cancer is difficult(e.g. by claiming itis DNA damage that causes cancer) and they also make alternative cancer treatmentslook weak and ineffective (partly because they have no idea how to use alternativecancer treatments).

Ditto for all large cancer charities and almost all small cancer charities which claim theyare "looking" for cures for cancer.

University-based researchers would lose the bulk of their funding if they released a curefor cancer or even claimed that cancer could be cured.

Let us, for a moment, assume that DNA damage did cause cancer (which it DOESN'T).Does that mean someone could not cure cancer by safely and gently targeting andkillingthe cancer cells. Laetrile is a natural molecule in apple seeds and apricot seedsand some grains. Laetrile safely and gently targets and kills cancer cells. Laetrile,especially when used in clinics, has cured many cancer patients. But it is an element ofsome of the best alternative cancer treatments for home use.

What the general public hears in the media is a well-orchestrated fantasyland of badscience and the complete blacklisting of people who know how to cure cancer. Thefantasy is driven by massive amounts of money.

The Savior of the world described what is going on in two words: "whited sepulcher."(See Matthew 23:27) Those people outside of the sepulcher (e.g. the general public)have no clue what is going on inside the sepulcher because the media has"whitewashed" the outside of the sepulcher by distracting their attention from what isreally going on inside the sepulcher.

Outside of the sepulcher is a fantasyland created by the artistry of the media. The insideof the sepulcher is the real world that the average person knows nothing about and may


15/43

become a victim of.

Many books have been written by people who have not been deceived. These booksdiscuss the corruption of the FDA, the pharmaceutical industry, orthodox medicine, etc.One of the best of these books is: "World Without Cancer - The Story of Vitamin B17,by G. Edward Griffin. This book is about laetrile (i.e. Vitamin B17) and starting withChapter 13 it gets into the behind-the-scenes events that have led to our currentsituation.


16/43

Question #5:Chemotherapy is so toxic and powerful, how can natural medicine bemore effective against cancer?

Answer #5:Let me borrow a story from one of my other articles:

Suppose you own an antique dining room table which is worth many tens of thousandsof dollars. Suppose your butler tells you that there are dozens of cockroaches crawlingaround on your priceless table and you will be having dinner guests in one hour.Your butler informs you that his job description does not include killingcockroaches and as he is leaving your house he suggests four options for gettingrid of the cockroaches:

1) He suggests you use a chainsaw to "slash" the little critters to pieces,2) He suggests you use a large and powerful flamethrower to "burn" the critters topieces,3) He suggests you pour 2 gallons of a highly, highly toxic liquid chemical on the tableto "poison" the critters, and4) He suggests you use an old $1 flyswatter.

Which of the four options would you use to get rid of the cockroaches? Would youchoose one of the first three options (slash, burn and poison) because they are highlypotent at killing cockroaches or would you choose the cheap, wimpy flyswatter?

Think about why you would make your choice.

Most likely you would pick the flyswatter because the other three items (which are farmore powerful than a flyswatter at killing cockroaches) are also massively powerful atdestroying your priceless table!!

Chemotherapy (the toxic chemical above), surgery (the chainsaw above) and radiation(the flamethrower above) do kill cancer cells, but they also kill healthycells (the pricelessantique table), damage the immune system, damage the ability of your digestive tract toprocess nutrients, etc. because they do not target cancer cells. Thus, these treatmentscannot cure cancer (which has spread) without killing the patient first.

By comparison, alternative cancer treatments (the flyswatter), while not as powerful asthe other items, are far more effectiveat treating cancer because these treatments

either target cancer cells or do not damage your healthy cells, Thus they can be givenin much higher dosesthan any of the "orthodox" cancer treatments.

For example, a person can drink a quart of carrot juice but they would die if they drank aquart of chemotherapy!!

But this is only part of the story. In addition to treatments which can safely kill cancercells, alternative cancer treatments typically build the immune system (instead of


17/43

destroying the immune system), multiple alternative cancer treatments can generally becombined, and so on.


18/43

Question #6:Can alternative cancer treatments cure someone who has had extensivechemotherapy, radiation and surgery?

Answer #6:That is the key question because most people who look into alternative

medicine have already had extensive orthodox cancer treatments!! Many of them havebeen sent home die before they even begin looking for an alternative cancer treatment.As already mentioned, the cure rate of natural medicine (i.e. alternative medicine), forpeople who are newly diagnosed, can be over 90% if the patient works with an expertwho knows what he or she is doing.

For alternative medicine experts, the cure rate for advanced cancer patients, who hadhad significant chemotherapy, radiation and surgery, used to be about 50%.Even though alternative cancer treatments are getting better and stronger, the cure ratehas probably dropped slightly in the past few years because medical doctors arekeeping their patients on chemotherapy and radiation longer and longer.Do not assume your doctor's estimate of how long you have to live is correct, especiallyif you start using alternative cancer treatments. If you work with an expert, your chanceof survival is about 50%, but even those who die can have a more comfortable life andcan life longer.

One very, very important thing to understand about alternative cancer treatments is thatnot all alternative cancer treatments are equally st rong!!! This is true especially forcancer patients who have had a lot of orthodox cancer treatments!!

For example, carrot juice and a different diet can easily cure most newly diagnosedcancer patients, but it would probably not be strong enoughfor a cancer patient senthome to die by orthodox medicine.

However, carrot juice can be part of a highly potent protocol designed specifically foradvanced cancer patients. For example, the Cellect-Budwig protocol, which wasdesigned specifically for advanced cancer patients, includes carrot juice but it alsoincludes several other treatments.

When a cancer patient is first diagnosed, there are usually hundredsof alternativecancer treatments which can cure them, if they are combined with a good diet.However, by the time a cancer patient is sent home to die by orthodox medicine, thenumber of natural cancer treatments which can give them a real chance of survival hasdwindled to only a handful of treatments. This is because not all alternative cancer

treatments are equally strong.

Most cancer patients begin their cancer treatment with orthodox medicine and whenthey are sent home to die they simply go home and die.

Those sent home to die who look into alternative medicine at least have a fightingchance.


19/43

An "advanced cancer patient" (i.e. someone who has had extensive orthodox cancertreatments or someone who has a very nasty type of cancer) MUST work with an expertin alternative cancer treatments to even have a hope of survival. Helping an advancedcancer patient survive is an extremely complex process.

One option is to work with someone by telephone and another option is to go to analternative cancer treatment clinic in the U.S. or another country. Do not assume that allclinics are better than all home treatments. Some home treatments (with experttelephone support) are far better than some clinics.

Since 2002 I have been researching alternative cancer treatments. I know I have seenmore than 600 alternative cancer treatments. But since 2004 I have been sorting outthese treatments, as time permits, to find the most potent treatments for advancedcancer patients.

It is this research which has allowed the Cancer Tutor website to help so many cancerpatients. And I have never charged one cancer patient a single penny. But other cancerresearchers work full-time to help cancer patients and by necessity these people doneed to charge for their services and material.


20/43

Question #7:What kinds of alternative cancer treatments have and do exist?

Answer #7:M.D. run alternative medicine clinics in Germany are currently usinghyperthermia to allow small amounts of chemotherapy to target and safely kill cancercells.

Some clinics in the U.S. (in the states they are allowed to operate) are using insulin toallow small amounts of chemotherapy to target and safely kill cancer cells. This is called"Insulin Potentiation Therapy" or IPT.

In the 1930s, Dr. Royal Rife, a microbiologist, was curing cancer with very gentleelectromedicine called "Rife Machines." Like more recent "electromedicine" protocols,the treatment was so gentle that the patient barely knew the device was turned on.The American Medical Association, the labor union of medical doctors, tried to buyRife's technology; but Rife refused to sell because he knew they only wanted to "bury"his technology.

Because he would not sell-out, the FDA came in and shut down Dr. Rife. It was not until2008 and 2010 that two of his technologies were completely replicated by alternativemedicine cancer researchers.

The modern "Rife Machines" which replicated Rife's original technology are part of theGB-4000 family of devices. Each has the same frequencies and "carrier waves" of theoriginal Rife devices.

The GB-4000 actually comes in two different versions. First, is the GB-4000 with SR-410 watt linear amplifier. While this is an excellent protocol for cancer, a newer and more

powerful device has come out, the GB-4000 with M.O.P.A.

Basically, the GB-4000 creates the frequencies and the SR-4 or M.O.P.A. amplifies thefrequencies. These two devices replicate what Royal Rife's most famous devicesaccomplished, but using modern technology.

The Cancer Tutor website (www.cancertutor.com) was actually the first website toprovide step--by-step instructions on how to use the 2008 device (the GB-4000 with SR-4 amplifier) and the much more powerful 2010 device (the GB-4000 with M.O.P.A.).

However, for legal reasons these instructions have been moved to another website (the

Cancer Tutor website links to this article in the "electromedicine" protocols article).Some other brands of Rife Machines today, such as the Rife-Bare, do not have a carrierfrequency but yet are very effective at treating cancer.

The protocol of the late Dr. Bob Beck (he had a PhD in physics) for AIDS and canceralso used a "frequency generator" technology, but in an entirely different way as Rife.While the focus of Rife's technology was to revert cancer cells into normal cells, thefocus of the Bob Beck Protocol was to kill the microbes in the bloodstream and


21/43

elsewhere in the body. By doing this the immune system was supercharged and theimmune system was able to cure the cancer.

Actually, it was not so much that the immune system was "supercharged" as much asthat the immune system was able to perform at its full potential by not being burdenedby the presence of two pounds of microbes in the body.

Clearly, in my research since 2002, the direction of highly effective cancer treatments isin the direction of vibrational medicine, which includes both gentle electrical vibrationsand lightwaves.

It is microbes insidethe cancer cells which make a cell cancerous because they blockthe production of ATP molecules in the mitochondria (technically, these microbes blockthe production of pyruvate, which in turn blocks the production of ATP) and flood thecell with acidic mycotoxins.

(Note: See the answer to Question #13 for a detailed discussion on how microbescause cancer and why DNA damage does not cause cancer.)

Killing these microbeswas how Dr. Rife cured cancer in 100% of the cases.

And it is microbes in the bloodstream and throughout the bodythat heavily suppressesthe immune system. Killing these microbes was the way that Dr. Bob Beck (PhD inphysics) cured cancer in 95% of the cases.

ONLY vibrational medicine can safely get rid of these microbes. Microbes are very, verysmall compared to a human cell and can easily be killed or attenuated(i.e. made unable to breed) by electromedicine.

Some electromedicine treatments work by vibrating the microbes (at the correctfrequency) until they burst. Other electromedicine protocols work by breaking theenzymes off of the outside surface of the microbes so that they cannot breed. Otherslack finesse and simply electrocute the microbes.

But do not confuse the very gentle "electromedicine" of alternative medicine with thecrude, barbaric, painful and worthless "radiation" therapy of orthodox medicine.Radiation therapy is like using a rifle to put out a carpet fire, but "electromedicine" inalternative medicine is more like using a flyswatter because it is so easy to killmicrobes.

In the 1950s, Dr. Robert C. Olney, M.D. was curing cancer with ultraviolet bloodirradiation therapy (UVBI). He would extract some blood from the patient, useUltraviolet-A light to irradiate the blood and then he would put the blood backinto the patient's body. See the book: Into the Light - Tomorrow's MedicineToday by William Campbell Douglass II, M.D. (Chapter 12).

UVBI is considered an "oxygen" treatment, meaning it floods the body with oxygen.


22/43

However, it is not known whether this oxygen kills the cancer cells or it kills themicrobes inside the cancer cells or if it works in some other manner. It may actually bea vibrational medicine treatment.

Currently, some clinics in Mexico and other countries are using this technology(Google: UVBI cancer ultraviolet clinic).

While many alternative cancer treatments have solid cancer theory behind them, mostalternative cancer treatments were designed by exchanging notes with otherresearchers and by using their own experiences and research. All of them use specialdiets. All of them try to build the immune system. All of them try to protect the non-cancerous cells, and so on.

Most highly potent alternative cancer treatments (i.e. protocols) combine severalsupplements (and may include gentle electromedicine) to accomplish all of the neededtasks. Some of the top alternative cancer treatments today, which can be done at home,include:

Cellect-Budwig (nutrients),GB-4000 Protocols - i.e. Rife Machines (electromedicine, reverts cancer cells intonormal cells),Cesium Chloride (minerals and nutrients),Bob Beck Protocol (electromedicine, builds immune system),Bill Henderson Protocol (nutrients and immune builders),LifeOne Protocol (nutrients),various Oleander protocols (nutrients),Brandt Grape Cure (nutrients), etc., etc.

In some cases these protocols can be combined and in some cases they cannotbe combined.

See the left side-bar on any page on the Cancer Tutor website for links to these andother protocols after you read the rest of the questions and answers.

Of course, any alternative cancer treatment expert will give you a different list. This isbecause no single alternative cancer treatment expert has experience with every type ofalternative cancer treatment. We do the best we can with the limited time and resourceswe have.

Some new alternative cancer treatments could restore and even improve on the old50% cure rate on advanced cancer patients. Electromedicine, combined with one of thetop nutritional protocols, has by far the best chance of doing that.

In fact, the GB-4000 with M.O.P.A., combined with the Cellect-Budwig, is likely alreadyat or above the 50% cure rate on very advanced cancer patients. Some of the clinicsare also at or above the 50% cure rate on advanced cancer patients.


23/43

But the most important keyto survival is working with an expert, either at a clinic, overthe phone or by Internet. All of the treatments listed above, except the Bob BeckProtocol and Brandt Grape Cure (which have limited support), have expert supportavailable.

See the "Clinics" link on the left side-bar of any page on the Cancer Tutor website formore information about clinics.


24/43

Question #8:What Is the approach of alternative medicine?

Answer #8:Every human being has cancer cells in their body!! Anyone who can readthis sentence has many cancer cells in their body. However, our bodies were designedto have a very, very sophisticated immune system which, among other things, wasdesigned to safely target and kill cancer cells.

When a person is "diagnosed" with cancer it means there is an imbalancein their bodybetween the strength of their immune systemand the number of cancer cellsin theirbody. In other words, something has damaged their immune system and/or somethinghas caused a high number of cancer cells to form.

The result of this imbalance is an abnormally high number of cancer cells which thrive intheir body. The number of cancer cells may grow out of control and eventually theperson may be diagnosed with cancer.

The approach of many alternative or natural health practitioners is four-fold:

First, change the diet and lifestyle of the person to change their "inner terrain" to makethe body hostile to cancer cells (e.g. change to an alkaline diet),

Second, strengthen the immune system with very gentle electromedicine and/or naturalnutrients,

Third, use very gentle treatments that safely target and kill the cancer cells or revert thecancer cells into normal cells,

Fourth, use supplements to protect and energize the non-cancerous cells damaged byorthodox treatments.

As to the third item, if you kill all of the microbes which are inside of a cancer cell it willbe able to restore its metabolism, start creating ATP molecules again (without usingfermentation) and will revert into a normal cell. Dr. Royal Rife knew this in the 1930s buthis discoveries have been ignored by orthodox medicine.

By doing all four of the above things the cancer patient has the balance between theirimmune system and the number of cancer cells restored without damaging the body.They are cured because the balance has been restored back to normal!!

The approach of orthodox medicine, however, severely damages the immune systemwith chemotherapy, radiation and surgery. This makes the imbalance even worse.Orthodox cancer treatments also kill many healthy cells and can damage organs andthe lining of the stomach and colon; which can make it difficult for the patient to extractnutrients from healthy foods and supplements.

One of the reasons alternative medicine cancer researchers are so interested in


25/43

developing electromedicine protocols is because so many cancer patients havedamage to the lining of their stomach and colon (due to chemotherapy or surgery).Electromedicine becomes their only hope for survival because these things workwithout the abilityof the stomach and colon to digest nutrients from foods.

Is it any wonder that alternative cancer treatments, when used on newly diagnosedcancer patients and when administered by experts, have a massively higher cure ratethan orthodox medicine? Alternative cancer treatments build-up the person's body(especially the immune system) and gently deals with getting rid of the cancer cells.

However, even when orthodox medicine puts someone into "remission" (i.e. theircancer appears to be gone), their treatments have damaged the immune system sobadly that they have made the imbalance even worse, so even if orthodox medicineclaims they have put someone into remission, it is almost certain the cancer will comeback!! This is called: regression.


26/43


27/43


28/43

Question #10:Does chemotherapy and radiation extend life?

Answer #10:Study this quote:

A German epidemiologist from the Heidelberg/Mannheim Tumor Clinic, DrUlrich Abel, has done a comprehensive review and analysis of every majorstudy and clinical trial of chemotherapy ever done. His conclusions should beread by anyone who is about to embark on the Chemo Express.

To make sure he had reviewed everything ever published on chemotherapy,Abel sent letters to over 350 medical centers around the world, asking them tosend him anything they had published on the subject. Abel researchedthousands of articles: it is unlikely that anyone in the world knows more aboutchemotherapy than he.

"The analysis took him several years, but the results are astounding: Abelfound that the overall worldwide success rate of chemotherapy was 'appalling'because there was simply no scientific evidence available anywherethatchemotherapy can 'extend in any appreciable way the lives of patients sufferingfrom the most common organic cancers'.

Abel emphasizes that chemotherapy rarely can improve the quality of life. Hedescribes chemotherapy as 'a scientific wasteland' and states that at least 80per cent of chemotherapy administered throughout the world is worthless and isakin to the 'emperor's new clothes'--neither doctor nor patient is willing to giveup on chemotherapy, even though there is no scientific evidence that it works!(Lancet, 10 August 1991)

No mainstream media even mentioned this comprehensive study: it was totallyburied.Tim O'Shea, The Doctor Within


29/43

Question #11:What is the true cure rate of orthodox medicine?

Answer #11:Among the many types of cancer, there are a very small number ofcancers for which chemotherapy can actually keep a cancer patient in remissionindefinitely. However, for most types of cancer, in fact the vast majority of types ofcancer, chemotherapy is worthless and does more harm than good as was discussedabove.

Thus, their overall 3% cure rate is somewhat deceptive because for most kinds ofcancer the true cure rate is less than 1%. But even that number is deceptive because ofthe way they define "cure," the way they define "cancer," and so on.

The American Cancer Society is in charge of deceiving the general public as to theeffectiveness of orthodox cancer treatments. They use a wide range of verysophisticated statistical tricks to make chemotherapy look far more effective than itreally is. My first college degree was in mathematics so I understand their tricks.The board of the ACS is controlled by medical doctors, medical school executives, etc.and the ACS has absolutely no interest in curing cancer. Nor do most other "cancerresearch" organizations.

A "Non Sequitur" cartoon said it best (Friday, October 1, 2010). A dragon and a dragon-killing knight are talking to each other. The dragon says: "Look ... You're dead if youlose and out of a job if you win, so what I propose is a win-win that can be summed upin 3 words ... Dragon-slaying research."The caption says: "Birth of the perpetual fundraising industry."

Yes, there are a few very small cancer research organizations that really are looking for

cures for cancer (and if they are truly looking you can rest assured they have alreadyfound many cures), such as the Independent Cancer Research Foundation in Missouriand Utah and the American Anti-Cancer Institute in Washington state, but theseorganizations are blacklisted by the media and very few people know about them.


30/43

Question #12:Why do medical doctors use chemotherapy and radiation?

Answer #12:Medical doctors are onlytrained to use chemotherapy and radiation.

While they are expected to use these protocols, there are also financial reasons thatthey use these protocols.

Back in the mid-1960s, in Scotland (we know this from the writings of Linus Pauling); ifmedical doctors knew they could not significantly benefit a cancer patient they wouldsimply send the patient home to die without any treatments!!

They realized that the treatments of modern medicine caused a great deal of sufferingbut did not extend life.

These doctors had integrity because they did what was best for their patient's well-being. Such integrity is the subject of history books now.

"My studies have proved conclusively that untreated cancer victims live up tofour times longerthan treated individuals. If one has cancer and opts to donothing at all, he will live longer and feel better than if he undergoes radiation,chemotherapy or surgery ..."Prof Jones. (1956 Transactions of the N.Y. Academy of Medical Sciences, vol6)

Now consider this quote:

"In 1975, the respected British medical journal Lancet reported on a study

which compared the effect on cancer patients of (1) a single chemotherapy, (2)multiple chemotherapy, and (3) no treatment at all. 'No treatment' proved asignificantly better policy for patients' survival and for quality of remaining life.'"Barry Lynes, The Healing of Cancer - The Cures - the Cover-ups and theSolution Now! - page 9

Today, about 20% of cancer patient who die are still taking chemotherapy!! If medicaldoctors had any integrity they would stop giving a cancer patient chemotherapy as soonas they knew the patient could not be significantly benefited by orthodox treatments(which is typically the day they meet the patient). The integrity of the 1960s is goneforever.

It seems that today no one considers quality of life or life-expectancy to be important.As already mentioned, if medical doctors today used the best of the alternative cancertreatments their patients would have a 90% survival rate and their patients would havezero pain and suffering from their treatment!!

The mother of one of my son-in-laws had a type of cancer which medical doctors knewthey could not cure, but they did not send her home to die until they had all of her


31/43

insurance money and the money from 50 acres of her family's farm, which was theinheritance of her children.

Many medical doctors have seen this corruption and have moved from orthodoxmedicine to alternative medicine. Frequently they leave the United States and treatcancer patients in another country in order to avoid persecution by the AMA or theirstate medical board. Many of their patients are Americans!


32/43

Question #13:Why does a healthy cell become cancerous and is this knowledgeimportant?

Answer #13:You have probably been taught over and over again that it is DNAdamage that causes cancer. This is scientifically absurd. Whether this belief is whatsome people actually believe or whether it is nothing but a scam to convince thegeneral public that cancer cannot be cured, I do not know.

The truth is that once a person understands what really causes cancer they willunderstand why it can be so easy to cure a newly diagnosed cancer patient of cancer.But even very advanced cancer patients can benefit from a clear understanding of whatcauses cancer.

When talking about what causes cancer we need to talk about it at two different levels.One level to talk about cancer is at the systemic level, meaning what causes cancer atthe level of the entire body.

The other level of talking about what causes cancer is at the cellular level. In otherwords, why does an individual normal cellbecome cancerous?These two subjects are totally different subjects!! In this article we will also talk aboutthe immune system and why it is so important.

We can compare these two levels by talking about a flood. We could talk all day longabout the damage a rain storm caused, such as the flooding of rivers, the damage tocrops caused by heavy rain, the damage to roads that have flooded, etc. But that is onlyone level to talk about rain. We could also ask what weather conditions cause rain toform in the clouds.

Thus, a scientist might talk about what causes rain up in the clouds, but a newscastermight talk about the flooding of a river caused by the rain.

The same is true about cancer. A discussion about what causes cancer at the cellularlevelis a totally different subject than talking about what causes cancer at the systemiclevel. And a discussion of the immune system is also critical.

Let us start by talking about cancer at the systemic level:

Part 1 of 3: What Causes Cancer At the Systemic Level

Every human being has cancer cells in their body!! Anyone who can read this sentencehas many cancer cells in their body. However, God has designed our bodies to have avery, very sophisticated immune system which, among other things, was designed tosafely target and kill cancer cells.

When a person is "diagnosed" with cancer it means there is an imbalancein their bodybetween the strength of their immune system and the number of cancer cells in their


33/43

body. In other words, something has damaged their immune system and/or somethinghas caused a high number of cancer cells to form.

The result of this imbalance is an abnormally high number of cancer cells which thrive intheir body. The number of cancer cells may grow out of control and eventually theperson may be diagnosed with cancer.

The approach of many alternative or natural health practitioners is four-fold:

First, change the diet and lifestyle of the person to change their "inner terrain" to makethe body hostile to cancer cells (e.g. change to an alkaline diet),Second, strengthen the immune system with electromedicine and/or natural nutrients,Third, use very gentle treatments that safely target and kill the cancer cells or revertthem into normal cells,Fourth, use supplements to protect and energize the non-cancerous cells damaged byorthodox treatments.

Of course, in many cases other things are needed, but these are the most commonaspects of an alternative cancer treatment.

Note that in this process no damage is done to the body (except in rare cases whereorthodox medicine is needed to deal with a special situation).

By doing these things the balance (between their immune system and the number ofcancer cells) has been restored. They are cured!!

The approach of orthodox medicine, however, is to severely damage the immunesystem with chemotherapy, radiation and surgery. This makes the imbalance even

worse. Orthodox cancer treatments also kill many healthy cells and can damageorgans.

Ponder this carefully: even when orthodox medicine puts someone into "remission" (i.e.their cancer appears to be gone), they have made the imbalance even worse, so it isalmost certain the cancer will come back!! This is called: regression.

Is it any wonder that alternative cancer treatments, when administered by experts, havea massively higher cure rate than orthodox medicine?

Part 2 of 3: What Causes Cancer At the Cellular Level

So far we have only talked about what causes cancer at the systemic level. So whatcauses an individual cell to become cancerous? Many cancer cells form by a priorcancer cell dividing and creating two cancer cells. But how does a normal cell becomecancerous?

In a normal cell, molecules called ATP (adenosine triphosphate) provide the energy ofthe cell. ATP molecules are created inside the mitochondria which are inside of every


34/43

human cell. In fact, there are thousands of mitochondria inside of every human cell.

The normal process of creating ATP molecules is this (this is highly simplified):

1) Glucose gets inside of the cell,2) Some of the glucose is converted into pyruvate [this is a 10 step process],3) Pyruvate gets inside of the mitochondria,4) Once inside the mitochondria, pyruvate is at the beginning of two sequential chemicalreactions (the Citric Acid Cycle and then the Electron Transport Chain which spins-offabout half-way through the Citric Acid Cycle).

It is these two cycles which normally create the ATP molecules in the cell.

Cancer cells consume 15 times more glucose than a normal cell. Thus, a person wouldlogically expect a cancer cell to create 15 times more ATP molecules than a normal cell.

But in reality, cancer cells create virtually zero ATP molecules!! Cancer cells are ATPmolecule starved and they have to revert to fermentation to create what little ATPmolecules they create.

With so much glucose there should be an abundance of ATP molecules!! Why in theworld do cancer cells consume 15 times more glucose and yet not be able to create any

ATP molecules in the normal way?

The thing that blocks the production of ATP molecules is a very special pleomorphicbacteria, which some alternative cancer treatment researchers believe is HelicobacterPylorior H. pylori. However, it is not quite as simple as naming one bacteria as a causeof cancer, but I won't get into that.

So how does a bacteria block the production of ATP molecules and thus turn a cellcancerous?

The bacteria blocks ATP production in two different ways:

First, bacteria eat glucose so as the bacteria proliferates inside the cell (by the way, abacteria is roughly the same size as a mitochondria) it intercepts more and moreglucose. This means less and less pyruvate is made. With less pyruvate there is less

ATP.

Secondly, microbes excrete mycotoxins, which are highly acidic and totally worthlessmolecules. This also blocks the mitochondria from getting the key molecules it needs tocreate ATP.

The bottom line is that the mitochondria, instead of "swimming" in a sea of pyruvate areswimming in a sea of mycotoxins!!

This blocks the mitochondria from obtaining any pyruvate and thus blocks both the


35/43


36/43


37/43

In the book: Cancer & Natural Medicine - A Textbook of Basic Science and ClinicalResearch, author John Boik identifies a dozen substances which have been shown invitro to be able to revert cancer cells into normal cells(he calls it "differentiation")!! Alltwelve of these items are anti-microbial.

DMSO also reverts cancer cells into normal cells, but is so important it is mentioned inits own table, Table 2.3!!

If cancer was caused by DNA damage, it would be impossible to revert cancer cells intonormal cells. But several very effective alternative cancer treatments were designed todo just that.

There are likely many natural molecules in nature which cure cancer by killing themicrobes inside the cancer cells, but which have not yet been identified as working inthis manner. It is much easier to kill microbes than to kill cancer cells, if the substancecan get inside of the cancer cell.

The Independent Cancer Research Foundation, Inc. (ICRF) researches bothelectromedicine protocols (such as Rife developed) and has also designed severalcancer treatments using DMSO or MSM as carriers to get microbe killing substances(such as colloidal silver) inside of cancer cells. These treatments have been verysuccessful, but research is still very preliminary.

In fact, for several years, the ICRF has been involved in researching ways to revertcancer cells into normal cells. The reason for this research is that these protocols canwork much fasterthan protocols which kill cancer cells because there is no debris fromdead cancer cells. This is the ideal way to cure cancer, along with building the immune

system.

Part 3a of 3: The Immune System

A normal person will not be diagnosed with cancer in their lifetime. The reason is thatthere is enough of a balance between their immune system and the number of cancercells that the cancer cells do not get out of control.

However, what most people do not understand is how sophisticated and potent theimmune system is if it is fully functioning. In fact, it is extremely rare when someone'simmune system is fully functioning, that is why so little is known about the power of the

immune system.

It is a fact that if a person's immune system was fully functional no one would ever getcancer.

The immune system creates two key molecules called: interleukin and interferon. Thesemolecules are called neuropeptides or nerve proteins. There are more than 2,000neuropeptides in the body, but the cancer-fighting effects of most of them are unknown.


38/43

Interleukin and interferon, and likely several other neuropeptides, are absolutely deadlyto cancer cells!!

The problem is that the human body generally does not produce an optimal amount ofthese neuropeptides.

The reason is that microbes (but notthe same microbes that live inside of cancer cells)block the effectiveness of the immune system.

The average person has about 2 poundsof microbes in their bloodstream and in otherplaces in their body. It is these microbes which interfere with the immune system'sability to create these key neuropeptides.

How do we know this?

The reason is an alternative cancer treatment called the Bob Beck Protocol. Thisprotocol is a simple electromedicine device which completely cleans the blood of

microbes within a few weeks. It was originally designed as a cure for AIDS, which it is,but it also turns out to be a cure for cancer and I mean very advanced cancer cases!!

The question is this: how does this simple protocol cure cancer?

The reason is that when the body has no microbes in the bloodstream the immunesystem becomes supercharged as it can in no other way!! The body makes theneuropeptides in "large" amounts (this is a relative term, not an absolute term).The neuropeptides, when the immune system is supercharged by getting rid of themicrobes, quickly destroys the cancer cells.

It takes about 3 weeks for the Bob Beck Protocol to get rid of all of the microbes in thebloodstream [Note: the protocol should continue for life or the microbes will comeback!!!]. Exactly how long it takes the immune system to be fully recharged is unknown,but likely the immune system starts to become effective against cancer within three orfour weeks of starting the protocol.

The contribution of Dr. Bob Beck, PhD (his PhD was in physics and he taught physics atUSC) should not be underestimated!!

The point is that the Bob Beck Protocol should be used by every cancer patient who isNOT on chemotherapy or other toxic drugs or another electromedicine protocol (there

are also a few alternative cancer treatments which should not be used with the BeckProtocol because of electroporation).

Drugs cannot be used with electromedicine because of "electroporation," which is aphenomenon which would allow the drugs to get inside of the wrong cells.

Another absolutely forbidden substance when using this protocol is garlic. Garlic shouldnever be used by any human being because it kills brain cells.


39/43

Part 3b of 3: The Immune System

It has been known for many years that some plants and other natural substances helpbuild the immune system without getting rid of all of the microbes in the bloodstream.Certain mushrooms have been particularly identified as being helpful for the immunesystem.

Here is a list of some of the supplements that claim to help build the immunesystem.

The 4Life brand of Transfer Factor Plus may be the best immune building productavailable to cancer patients. It consists of:Beta Glucans polysaccharides, immune builder, anti-cancer, anti-tumor Maitake andShiitake Mushrooms antiviral, antifungal, antibacterial, cellular function (immunesystem) Cordyceps polysaccharides, sterols (immune system and many otheractions) Inositol Hexaphosphate (IP6) - anticancer Beta Sitosterol phytosterol(immune system and anti-inflammatory) Olive Leaf Extract antiviral, antifungal,antibacterial (even used for AIDS/HIV)

Here is a list of other excellent immune builders:

1) Organic Germanium [Recommended] See:http://www.positivehealth.com/permit/Articles/Nutrition/Germanium/chapter3.htm Seefor vendors: Article and Vendors of Germanium

2) IP6 (Inositol hexaphosphate) [Recommended]

3) A Beta Glucan Supplement: "Beta-1,3D Glucan" [made by Transfer Point] (*)[Recommended]4) MGN3 / MGN-3 (available in the U.S. under the brand name: BioBran)5) An AHCC Supplement: Immpower, ImmunoKinoko, Immune-Assist includes AHCC6) Immune Fx7) Zeolites (heavy metals interfere with the immune system, zeolites remove heavymetals)8) Aloe Immune glyconutrient product (see my Stage IV article for information about thisproduct)9) Moducare (a sterols and sterolins supplement)10) Garlic - whole bulbs or a supplement designed for immune system (use only during

active cancer treatment)11) RM-10 Ultra [Garden of Life] (*)12) Oncolyn (www.bellayre.com) (*)(*) means the product is endorsed by cancer researcher Bill Henderson

There are many other products designed to build the immune system (e.g. Lentinan,PSK, PSP, Coriolan, D-Fraction, Mushroom Immunity Complex, etc.)!!


40/43

Be aware that every vendor claims their product is the best and also remember thatalternative cancer researchers do not have lab facilities to test their claims!!

MGN-3 or BioBran has a single manufacturer, and has been studied in labs, and is alsorecommended. However, MGN-3 or MGN3 has been severely persecuted by the FDAand its availability and brand name changes from time to time.

In summary, there are several natural ways to cure cancer:

1) You can safely and gently kill the cancer cells with nutrients, oxygen therapies,etc.,

2) You can safely and gently kill the microbeswhich are inside the cancer cellswith electromedicine, DMSO or other tactics and thus revert the cancer cells intonormal cells,

3) You can safely and gently kill the microbes which are in the bloodstream and thussupercharge the immune system to create interleukin and interferon and otherneuropeptides, which in turn kill the cancer cells,

4) You can supercharge the immune system with nutrients. This can also cure cancerthough it does not work as fast as some of the other treatments. Many natural plantshave been identified which can build the immune system without killing all of themicrobes in the bloodstream (or perhaps some of them work by killing microbes in thebloodstream and no one realizes that that is the way they work),

5) You can block the "lactic acid cycle" with hydrazine sulphate (a.k.a hydrazine sulfate)(this is not a direct cure, but it extends the life of the patient so other treatments have

longer to work), 6) You can supercharge the non-cancerous cells with nutrients andminerals. Note: this is not a direct cure, but is very commonly used to extend the life ofthe patient until other treatments can become effective. In fact, it is frequently the firstthing that is done in a treatment.

A typical cancer treatment will actually do three or four of the above things and maybeall six of them.

If I were going to use the Bob Beck Protocol I would certainly also use plant and herbalprotocols which also help build the immune system, however, I would not use thesupplements and herbal products within two hours of each other.


41/43

Question #14:What are the best Alternative Cancer Treatments?

Answer #14:The reader might wonder about which of the roughly 600 alternativecancer treatments is the strongest, safest and fastest-acting for advanced cancerpatients.

The answer is that no one knows because none of us has the time to work with morethan a few dozen of the protocols.

For newly diagnosed cancer patients, there are hundreds of effective alternative cancertreatments if the patient does not have a fast-growing type of cancer or a cancer whichhas already spread significantly.

Thus, I will only address the question for those who have had significant orthodoxcancer treatments.

For clinic use, the German clinics have the best reputation (especially the ones that usehyperthermia), but the German clinics are very busy and do not always keep up withnew technologies so I am not sure if they are still the best.

The German cancer clinics also have a fairly significant rate of "regression" becausefew people realize that a cancer patient is NOT CURED by simply getting rid of thecancer cells. They are cured ONLY when the balance between there immune systemand the number of cancer cells are in balanceAT NORMAL LEVELS.

For those who have had chemotherapy it generally takes 2 or 3 years to rebuild theimmune system back to normal levels. Chemotherapy has destroyed the normal level

of the immune system, and you CANNOT restore the immune system in three weekswhile at a clinic.

Every alternative cancer clinic sends their patients home with a list of supplements totake, but they do not seem to grasp what it takes to fully restore the immune system.

Anyone who has been to a clinic actually needs to go on a full alternative cancertreatment after they are home. This protocol should include a nutritional protocol plusimmune builders (immune builders could include the Bob Beck Protocol and nutritionalnutrition builders).

As far as home treatmentsare concerned, for advanced cancer patients who have beensent home to die; it is highly recommendedto combine an electromedicine protocol(which either reverts cancer cells into normal cells or supercharges the immune system)with a nutritional protocol which includes immune builders.

A "not-so-advanced" cancer patient can get by with just a nutritional protocol.

An electromedicine protocol is required when the person has had a lot of chemotherapy


42/43

(which damages the cells in the stomach or colon, thus the patient cannot properlydigest supplements) OR they have had stomach or colon surgery.

In other words, if their stomach or colon are damaged, a nutritional protocol will likelynot be enough.

In the experience of the cancer researchers of the Independent Cancer ResearchFoundation, the best electromedicine protocol is the GB-4000 M.O.P.A. plasmamachine which was originally designed by Royal Rife, but has been replicated usingmodern technology.

However, there are scores of different brands of Rife Machines and we are only familiarwith several of them. However, clearly the GB-4000 family is the most authentic brandbecause original Rife machines were carefully studied by the manufacturer (in fact heowns an original Rife machine).

However, this does not mean it is the most effective electromedicine device, only that itis the most authentic.

Electromedicine protocols do no harm to the body, but are able to revert cancer cellsinto normal cells. We know this because they workand because there is no way anelectromedicine protocol can differentiate a cancer cell from a normal cell (which wouldbe required for them to kill cancer cells and leave healthy cells alone). Nor were theydesigned to make that differentiation.

Unfortunately the GB-4000 with M.O.P.A. device costs close to $5,000, and as alreadymentioned, many cancer patients don't have any money left. The GB-4000 with SR-4amplifier costs about $2,500.

A far less expensive device, which we know is very effective, but don't know if it is aseffective as the M.O.P.A., is the Bob Beck Protocol.

While the GB-4000 (which also has a little brother, the SR-4) reverts cancer cells intonormal cells, the Bob Beck Protocol builds the immune system and lets the immunesystem take care of the cancer.

Those with a little electronics background can actually build the Bob Beck Protocol forless than $200 if they watch the Bob Beck videos on YouTube (watch the Ventura andGranada videos as a minimum). However, these devices can also be purchased on theInternet.

So what should be combined with the electromedicine device? Here is a short list ofcandidates:1) Cellect-Budwig (a complete protocol by itself),2) Bill Henderson Protocol (also a complete protocol by itself),3) A quality Limu Juice,4) Brandt Grape Cure,


43/43

5) and many, many others.

For those with considerable funds, they might combine the GB-4000 with M.O.P.A withthe Cellect-Budwig. For those with more modest funds they may combine the Bob BeckProtocol (especially if it is made at home) with the Bill Henderson Protocol, which isvery inexpensive.

Note that I have not mentioned the Kelley protocol. It is best used at a clinic, not athome, though it can be used at home. Like the Gerson protocol, it is a lot of work.

For a list of other excellent websites on alternative cancer treatments, go to the homepage of the Cancer Tutor website (www.cancertutor.com) and search for the string:"Links To Other Cancer Websites"

R. Webster Kehr

www.cancertutor.comMay, 2011

14 cancer questions

Documents