140723 july 23rd meeting
DESCRIPTION
7/23/14 MeetingTRANSCRIPT
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA,
HASTINGS COLLEGE OF THE LAW 200 McALLISTER: KANE HALL PROGRAMMING + PLANNING
SPACE BLOCKING MEETING TWO OF TWO 07.23.14
proprietary and confidentialUC Hastings College of the Law Kane Hall Programming and Planning
AGENDA
2
REVIEW
1. GUIDING PRINCIPLES
2. FINALIZED CONCEPTUAL ORG. MODEL
3. MOVE-IN SPACES
DISCUSS
4. POTENTIAL PROGRAM BLOCKING SCENARIOS
GUIDING PRINCIPLES AND BOUNDARIES REVIEW
1.
proprietary and confidentialUC Hastings College of the Law Kane Hall Programming and Planning
4
PROCESS
• Engage all stakeholders in the project process. • Provide a range of options for optimal strategies. !LONG RANGE CAMPUS PLAN
• All strategies will support the LRCP 1.0 and preceding strategic reports. • Design for the needs of the students. • Leverage 100 McAllister for potential revenue-generating opportunities. • Increase student life and activity at 200 McAllister, and in particular the ground floor. Improve
first impressions of the campus.
GUIDING PRINCIPLESREVIEW
proprietary and confidentialUC Hastings College of the Law Kane Hall Programming and Planning
GUIDING PRINCIPLESREVIEW
5
CLINICS, CENTERS, AND JOURNALS PROGRAMS
• Design to serve the mission(s), teachings, services, and scholarship of each clinic, center, and journal.
• Serve the needs of both the individuals and the group for all programs. • Integrate programs into the intellectual life of the students and the College. • Provide opportunities for students and practitioners to work together and collaborate. • Maintain and strengthen the unique identity and brand of each program. • Maintain and improve the operations and physical relationships for each clinic, center, and
journal, as well as the inter-relationships between programs. • Design with flexibility in mind – grants and funding swings often cause staff fluctuation. • Design with clients in mind, which considers confidentiality and accessibility. • Remain cutting-edge and innovative with regard to tools and technology in order to remain
competitive. • Design with the consideration of economies of scale by maximizing staffing spaces and
developing common area spaces for similar or overlapping programs. • Improve wayfinding and path of travel to the clinics, centers, and journals. Make them easily
accessible to the broader community. • Ensure the security of students, faculty, staff, and the clinics, centers, and journals. • Employ sustainable design by considering the use of natural light, material choices, and
furniture selection. • Preserve the window line for shared and multi-functional space.
proprietary and confidentialUC Hastings College of the Law Kane Hall Programming and Planning
BOUNDARIESREVIEW
6
MOVE-OUT
• Relocate all programs in the 3rd, 4th, 22nd, and 23rd floor of 100 McAllister to 200 McAllister. • Consider the relocation of Health Services to a more private location on campus.
MOVE-IN
• Potential 200 McAllister relocation sites: 1st floor; 2nd floor health clinic; 4th and/or 6th floor library).
• Minimize cost of renovation and avoid changes that necessitate major changes to building systems.
• Preserve to the maximum extent possible previous investments in physical plant improvements.
• Preserve or increase the amount of student study space and classrooms on campus. • Preserve the special collections archive located on the 6th floor of 200 McAllister . • Maintain the amount of private faculty offices located on the 6th floor of 200 McAllister . • Journals must have 24 hour access. • Prioritize approaches and projects that minimize construction period disruptions to ongoing
academic operations. • All relocated programs will be moved in no later than January 2016.
FINALIZED CONCEPTUAL ORG. MODEL REVIEW
2.
proprietary and confidentialUC Hastings College of the Law Kane Hall Programming and Planning
8
CLASSROOM/SEMINAR
CLASSROOM/SEMINAR
CLASSROOM/SEMINAR
CLASSROOM/SEMINAR
CLASSROOM/SEMINAR
CLASSROOM/SEMINAR
CLASSROOM/SEMINAR
CED
OFFICE/ WORKSTATIONS
CGA
OFFICE/ WORKSTATIONS
SEEE
OFFICE/ WORKSTATIONS
IR
OFFICE/ WORKSTATIONS
SMALLMEETING
(2-6)
NEW CLINIC
OFFICE/ WORKSTATIONS
STUDENT WORKSTATIONS
RECEPTION/LOBBY
JOURNALOFFICE
JOURNALOFFICE
JOURNALOFFICE
JOURNALOFFICE
JOURNALOFFICE
JOURNALOFFICE
JOURNALOFFICE
JOURNALOFFICE
JOURNALOFFICE
PUBLISHINGOFFICE
MEETINGOFFICES/
WORKSTATIONS
RESOURCEW
LL
RECEPTION
IN2
MEETINGOFFICES/
WORKSTATIONS
RESOURCE
RECEPTION
CONS.
MEETINGOFFICES/
WORKSTATIONS
RESOURCE
RECEPTION
FU
TURE
MEETINGOFFICES/
WORKSTATIONS
RESOURCE
RECEPTION
CSLGL
MEETINGOFFICES/
WORKSTATIONS
RESOURCE
RECEPTION
CGRS
MEETINGOFFICES/
WORKSTATIONS
RESOURCE
RECEPTION
CN
DR / ME.
MEETINGOFFICES/
WORKSTATIONS
RESOURCE
RECEPTION
SMALLMEETING
(2-6)
BREAKOUT BREAKOUT
BREAKOUT
BREAKOUTBREAKOUT
BREAKOUT
COPYROOM/
STORAGE
LOUNGE
BREAK/ KITCHEN
MEDIUM MEETING ROOM /
BREAK-OUT(6-12)
COPYROOM/
STORAGE
RESOURCELIBRARY
LOUNGE
BREAK/KITCHEN
SMALLMEETING
(2-6)
SMALLMEETING
(2-6)
MEDIUM MEETING ROOM /
BREAK-OUT(6-12)
CLINICSCENTERS JOURNALS
GENERALFACULTY
MLPS
OFFICE/ WORKSTATIONS
RHRC
OFFICE/ WORKSTATIONS
FINALIZED ORG. MODELCONCEPTUAL ORGANIZATION MODEL – ALL PROGRAMS
MOVE-IN SPACES3.
proprietary and confidentialUC Hastings College of the Law Kane Hall Programming and Planning
UNDERSTANDING EXISTING CONDITIONSSPACE TEST FIT
10
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
Total Existing Space Program
Total PossibleRelocation Space
34,217 SF
25,346 SF
100 McAllister
198 McAllister
200 McAllister
1st Floor
6th Floor Opportunity
Classroomrs
Special Collections
Offices
Offices
Conf/Mtg/Resources
Instructional
Load/Circulation
proprietary and confidentialUC Hastings College of the Law Kane Hall Programming and Planning
11
OPPORTUNITY AREAS200 MCALLISTER– 6TH FLOOR
200 MCALLISTER 6TH FLOOR
6TH FLOOROF LIBRARYOpp.
OPPORTUNITY AREA
Opp.
***ANY MOVE WILL KEEP OR EXPAND EXISTING STUDENT STUDY SPACE
proprietary and confidentialUC Hastings College of the Law Kane Hall Programming and Planning
12
OPPORTUNITY AREASMCALLISTER 200 – 1ST FLOOR
200 MCALLISTER 1ST FLOOR
SCIENCE ANDTECHNOLOGYLAW JOURNAL
SLJTJOURNAL
FORMER BOOKSTORE, STUDENT CENTER,ANDBUSINESS CENTER
Opp.OPPORTUNITY AREA
Opp.
Opp.
Opp.
OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICE
FORMER BOOKSTORE
BUSINESS CENTER
CONF.
LOBBY
STUDENT INFO CENTER
200 MCALLISTER 1ST FLOOR
SCIENCE ANDTECHNOLOGYLAW JOURNAL
SLJTJOURNAL
FORMER BOOKSTORE, STUDENT CENTER,ANDBUSINESS CENTER
Opp.OPPORTUNITY AREA
Opp.
Opp.
Opp.
OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICE
FORMER BOOKSTORE
BUSINESS CENTER
CONF.
LOBBY
STUDENT INFO CENTER
proprietary and confidentialUC Hastings College of the Law Kane Hall Programming and Planning
13
UNDERSTANDING EXISTING CONDITIONSSPACE TEST FIT
DRAFT
Page 3 of 9
UC HASTINGS - KANE HALL PROGRAMMING & PLANNING
SPACE BLOCKING – Existing Square Footage Comparison7.23.2014
Centers
Clinics
Journals
CLINICSEXISTING ASF
CENTERSEXISTING ASF
JOURNALSEXISTING ASF
SPACE BLOCKING: THREE SCENARIOS
4.
proprietary and confidentialUC Hastings College of the Law Kane Hall Programming and Planning
15
SCENARIO 1: FLEXIBILITY OPTIMIZATION200 MCALLISTER 6TH FLOOR
DRAFT
Clinics / Centers / Journals
Interaction
Classroom / Seminar
General Offices
Student Study
Page 4 of 9
PROS: � Most flexible arrangement
maximizes ability for programs to expand and contract smartly and affordably
� Clear delineation between research programs and student spaces
CONS � Elongate space limits internal
layouts of programs; less opportunity for brand identity development
� No “grand entrance sequence”
UC HASTINGS - KANE HALL PROGRAMMING + PLANNING
FLEXIBILITY OPTIMIZATION – Scenario 1 of 3200 McAllister 6th Floor7.23.2014
PROS:
• Most flexible arrangement maximizes ability for all programs to expand and contract smartly and affordably
• Clear delineation between research programs and student spaces
CONS:
• Elongated space limits internal layouts of programs; less opportunity for brand identity development
• No "grand entrance sequence”
proprietary and confidentialUC Hastings College of the Law Kane Hall Programming and Planning
DRAFT
Clinics / Centers / Journals
Interaction
Classroom / Seminar
General Offices
Student Study
Page 5 of 9
CONS � Research programs are “landlocked”
which makes expansion difficult � Student-oriented programs
(e.g. classrooms) are distributed throughout potentially creating traffic through research programs
PROS: � Orientation of program massing
optimizes ability to develop unique identities within each program space
� Primary reception allows for “grand entrance sequence”
� Separation of front and back of the house operations
UC HASTINGS - KANE HALL PROGRAMMING + PLANNING
IDENTITY DEVELOPMENT OPTIMIZATION – Scenario 2 of 3200 McAllister 6th Floor7.23.2014
16
SCENARIO 2: IDENTITY OPTIMIZATION200 MCALLISTER 6TH FLOOR
PROS:
• Primary reception allows for “grand entrance sequence”
• Separation of front and back of the house operations
CONS:
• Research programs are “landlocked” which makes expansion difficult
• Student study space base limited amount of natural light exposure
proprietary and confidentialUC Hastings College of the Law Kane Hall Programming and Planning
17
SCENARIO 3: WITH JOURNALS200 MCALLISTER 6TH FLOOR
DRAFT
Clinics / Centers / Journals
Interaction
Classroom / Seminar
General Offices
Student Study
Page 6 of 9
PROS: � Locating a majority of classrooms
on the first floor may reduce traffic and noise
CONS � Need to occupy first floor of
building in order to incorporate all necessary programs
UC HASTINGS - KANE HALL PROGRAMMING + PLANNING
SPACE BLOCKING – Scenario 3 of 3200 McAllister 6th Floor7.23.2014
PROS:
• Primary reception allows for “grand entrance sequence”
• Locating a majority of classrooms on the first floor responds to goals of the LRCP and makes the first floor of 200 McAllister a more vibrant place on campus
CONS:
• Leaving the first floor open for the relocation of HR and Fiscal in the future also responds to the recommendations in the LRCP to consolidate all student services into one building
• Student study space base limited amount of natural light exposure
proprietary and confidentialUC Hastings College of the Law Kane Hall Programming and Planning
18
200 MCALLISTER 1ST FLOOR
DRAFT
Clinics / Centers / Journals
Interaction
Classroom / Seminar
General Offices
Student Study
Page 7 of 9
UC HASTINGS - KANE HALL PROGRAMMING + PLANNING
SPACE BLOCKING – Scenario 3 of 3200 McAllister 1st Floor7.23.2014
PROS: � Locating a majority of classrooms
on the first floor may reduce traffic and noise
CONS � Need to occupy first floor of
building in order to incorporate all necessary programs
PROS:
• Primary reception allows for “grand entrance sequence”
• Locating a majority of classrooms on the first floor responds to goals of the LRCP and makes the first floor of 200 McAllister a more vibrant place on campus
CONS:
• Leaving the first floor open for the relocation of HR and Fiscal in the future also responds to the recommendations in the LRCP to consolidate all student services into one building
• Student study space base limited amount of natural light exposure
SCENARIO 3: WITH JOURNALS
proprietary and confidentialUC Hastings College of the Law Kane Hall Programming and Planning
SCENARIO COMPARISONPROS AND CONS
19
DRAFT
Page 8 of 8
UC HASTINGS - KANE HALL PROGRAMMING & PLANNING
SPACE BLOCKING – Comparison
PROS: � Most flexible arrangement maximizes
ability for programs to expand and contract smartly and affordably
� Clear delineation between research programs and student spaces
PROS: � Primary reception allows for “grand entrance
sequence” � Separation of front and back of the house
operations
PROS: � Primary reception allows for “grand entrance
sequence” � Locating a majority of classrooms on the
first floor responds to goals of the Long Range Campus Plan and makes the first floor of 200 McAllister a more vibrant place on campus
CONS � Elongate space limits internal layouts
of programs; less opportunity for brand identity development
� No “grand entrance sequence”
CONS � Research programs are “landlocked” which
makes expansion difficult � Student Study Space has limited amount of
natural light exposure
CONS � Leaving the first floor open for the
relocation of HR and Fiscal in the future also responds to recommendations in the Long Range Campus Plan to consolidate all student services into one building
� Student Study Space has limited amount of natural light exposure
1. FLEXIBILITY OPTIMIZATION 2. IDENTITY OPTIMIZATION 3. 6TH FLOOR W/JOURNALS
1. FLEXIBILITY OPTIMIZATION !PROS:
• Most flexible arrangement maximizes ability for all programs to expand and contract smartly and affordably
• Clear delineation between research programs and student spaces !
CONS:
• Elongated space limits internal layouts of programs; less opportunity for brand identity development
• No "grand entrance sequence”
2. IDENTITY OPTIMIZATION !PROS:
• Primary reception allows for “grand entrance sequence”
• Separation of front and back of the house operations !
CONS:
• Research programs are “landlocked” which makes expansion difficult
• Student study space base limited amount of natural light exposure
3. 6TH FLOOR WITH JOURNALS !PROS:
• Primary reception allows for “grand entrance sequence”
• Locating a majority of classrooms on the first floor responds to goals of the LRCP and makes the first floor of 200 McAllister a more vibrant place on campus !
CONS:
• Leaving the first floor open for the relocation of HR and Fiscal in the future also responds to the recommendations in the LRCP to consolidate all student services into one building
• Student study space base limited amount of natural light exposure