15.3.2013order(sp)

8/11/2019 15.3.2013ORDER(SP)

1/11

STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJABSCO NO. 84-85, SECTOR 17-C, CHANDIGARH

Visit us @ www.infocommpunjab.com

Sh.Ajaib Singh,S/o Bhinder Singh,

R/o Village Bishanpura, P.. Rajewas,!ehsil Samana, "istrict Patiala. #$omplainant

VersusPublic %nformation fficer/o Panjabi &ni'ersit(,Patiala.

# RespondentCOMPLAINT CASE NO.364 /!13

Present) *one on behalf of $omplainantSh. Vi+rant Sharma, Ad'ocate $ounsel for the Respondent -0123334

ORDER

!he $omplainant is absent toda( but he has sent intimation that he would not be

able to appear toda( and has sought adjournment. Accordingl( the case shall come

upon 5.4.!13 "# 1!.3! AM.

Sd/1$S"#%&'() P"* S%&+

5arch 3, 627. State %nformation $ommissioner
http://www.infocommpunjab.com/http://www.infocommpunjab.com/

8/11/2019 15.3.2013ORDER(SP)

2/11



Sh.Surinder 8umar BajajS/o Sh. 9arish 8umar $hhabra,

Street no., :obind *agari near 5.S. 8a+ar,5alout, "istrict 5u+atsar. #$omplainant

VersusPublic %nformation fficer/o "irector,Punjab State ;and "e'elopment < =inancial $orporationS$ *o. 2127, Sector > $,$handigarh. # Respondent

COMPLAINT CASE NO.4! /!13

Present) 5s. S. $handra, Ad'ocate counsel for the $omplainant5r. R.;. ;uthra, Ad'ocate, counsel for the Respondent.

ORDER

n behalf of the $omplainant 5s. S. $handra, Ad'ocate is appearing. =or the

Respondent Sh. R.;. ;uthra, Ad'ocate is appearing. !he ld. $ounsel for the

Respondent has stated that he needs some time to pro'ide the information which is

a'ailable with him. %n 'iew of the re?uest of the counsel for the Respondent the case is

adjourned to .0.627.

!o come up on 11.4.!13 "# 1!.3! AM.

Sd/1 $S"#%&'() P"* S%&+


8/11/2019 15.3.2013ORDER(SP)

3/11



Sh.Prem 8umar Rattan,9ouse *o. >/, Par+ road,*ew 5andi "huri #Appellant

Versus. Public %nformation fficer

/o =inancial $ommissioner $ooperationPunjab 5ini Secretariat,$handigarh.

6. =irst Appellate Authorit(/o =inancial $ommissioner $ooperation

Punjab 5ini Secretariat,$handigarh. # Respondents

APPEAL CASE NO.17/!13

Present) Sh.Prem 8umar Rattan, $omplainant in person ->666227-4Sh. 8ulwant Singh Superintendent ->66034

ORDER

RTI A*%"#%0& %*(' 0& 2 6..626

PIO R(*%(' 2 7.>.626

F%)# A("* F%*(' 2 .2.626

S(0&' A("* R((%(' 2 -..627

%& S#"#( I&0)"#%0& C0%%0& 0&

I&0)"#%0& S0+# )

R(+")'%&+ R*( &'() % #( ACR % )(0(&'('/")0('.

G)0&' 0) C0*"%/A("* ) *o information was supplied

$ont. Page16

8/11/2019 15.3.2013ORDER(SP)

4/11

161


R(*(" F"# E()+%&+ ')%&+ 2H(")%&+

!he respondent has stated that the A$R is written b( different officers +eeping in

'iew the wor+ of concerned officials, !he "eput( $ommissioner just gi'es his opinion in

the A$R form of the concerned officials wor+ing in his "istrict. 9"/ %ncharge of the

"epartment then writes his A$R, then the A$R1 goes to =$1 $ooperati'e.

!he Respondent has also stated in his repl( to the point *o.6 raised b( the

Appellant that there are no noting portions in which this specific A$R was attached in

the record. !he A$R form itself is sent directl( to different high officials, from the 9" to

=$1$ooperati'e in the "epartment. *ow the case is *0('.

DECISION)

!he case is, therefore, *0(' "&' '%0(' 0.

Announced in open $ourt,

!he copies of order be sent to the parties.

Sd/1 $S"#%&'() P"* S%&+


8/11/2019 15.3.2013ORDER(SP)

5/11



Sh.Prem 8umar Rattan,9ouse *o. >/, Par+ road,

*ew 5andi "huri #AppellantVersus

. Public %nformation fficer/o =inancial $ommissioner $ooperationPunjab 5ini Secretariat,$handigarh.

6. =irst Appellate Authorit(/o =inancial $ommissioner $ooperationPunjab 5ini Secretariat,$handigarh. # Respondents

APPEAL CASE NO.173 /!13

P)(( 2 Sh.Prem 8umar Rattan, $omplainant in personSh. 8ulwant Singh Superintendent

ORDER

RTI A*%"#%0& %*(' 0& 2 6..626

PIO R(*%(' 2 *il

F%)# A("* F%*(' 2 .2.626

S(0&' A("* R((%(' 2 -..627

%& S#"#( I&0)"#%0& C0%%0& 0&

I&0)"#%0& S0+# )

R(+")'%&+ R*( 0 P)00#%0&.

G)0&' 0) C0*"%/A("* ) *o information was supplied

C0. P"+(-

8/11/2019 15.3.2013ORDER(SP)

6/11

--

APPEAL CASE NO.173 /!13

R(*(" F"# E()+%&+ ')%&+ 2

H(")%&+

"uring the course of discussion it has transpired that the Appellant wants to

+now that in the case of Sh. Baljinder Singh $hief Auditor who lateron became

Additional $hief Auditor of Audit ing, while writing his A$R who were the three

authorities i.e. Reporting , Re'iewing and Accepting. !he Respondent has stated that in

this case, reporting authorit( was 9", while re'iewing and accepting authorit( was

=$1$ooperati'e who acted as Re'iewing cum Accepting Authorit(.

Since the needful has been done the case is closed.

DECISION)




Sd/1 $S"#%&'() P"* S%&+


8/11/2019 15.3.2013ORDER(SP)

7/11



Sh.Prem 8umar Rattan,

9ouse *o. >/, Par+ road,*ew 5andi "huri #Appellant

Versus

. Public %nformation fficer,/o "irector, Vigilance Bureau, PunjabS$ 21, Sector >1",$handigarh.

6. =irst Appellate Authorit(/o "irector, Vigilance Bureau, PunjabS$ 21, Sector >1",$handigarh # Respondents


Present) Sh.Prem 8umar Rattan, Appellant in personSh. P.8. $hibber, "eput( "istrict Attorne(, /o Vigilance Bureau, Punjab-0>23374

ORDER2

RTI A*%"#%0& %*(' 0& 2 0.0.626

PIO R(*%(' 2 *il

F%)# A("* F%*(' 2 *il

C0*"%/ S(0&' A("* R((%(' 2 -..627

%& S#"#( I&0)"#%0& C0%%0& 0&

I&0)"#%0& S0+# 2

D(%%0& #"(& FC 9%( %& #( :(") !! #0 !11.

$ont. Page16

8/11/2019 15.3.2013ORDER(SP)

8/11

161


DECISION

G)0&' 0) C0*"%/A("* 2 *o information was supplied

R(*(" F"# E()+%&+ ')%&+ 2H(")%&+

"uring the $ourse of discussion that it has transpired that the re?uisite

information has alread( been sent b( the Respondent to the appellantwhich the

Appellant has not recei'ed. !he Respondent was directed to suppl( a cop( of the repl(

alread( sent to the Appellant toda(. !he re?uisite documents ha'e been dul( handed

o'er to the Appellant in the $ourt itself. %n 'iew of the abo'e the case is *0('.

DECISION)




Sd/1 $S"#%&'() P"* S%&+


8/11/2019 15.3.2013ORDER(SP)

9/11



Sh.Vi+as Bhardwaj,A202, Ashiana :ardens, Bhiwadi,Rajasthan1722- #Appellant


/o Panjab !echnical uni'ersit(,8apurthala Road, Calandhar

6. =irst Appellate Authorit(/o Panjab !echnical uni'ersit(,8apurthala Road, Calandhar # Respondents


Present) Sh.Vija( "himan, on behalf of $omplainant5s. :eti+a Sood, ;egal fficer, P!&, -0>2-2034 for Respondent.

ORDER

n behalf of the Appellant, Sh.Vija( "himan is present alongwith authorit( letter.

"uring the course of discussion the Respondent has re?uested that the rele'ant record

is in the custod( of 5r. Ranjit Singh, $ontroller of DEamination Regular Branch4 P.!.&.,Calandhar. !he Respondent has re?uested that alongwith her the P% /o $ontroller of

DEamination , P.!.&. Calandhar be also ordered to be present in the court on the neEt

date of hearing, so that the information being sought b( the Appellant can be pro'ided.

Accordingl( alongwith the Respondent who is present toda( the P% /o $ontroller of

DEamination, P.!.&. be present in the court on the neEt date of hearing.

!o come up on 11.4.!13 "# 1!.3! A.M.

Sd/1 $S"#%&'() P"* S%&+5arch 3, 627. State %nformation $ommissioner

$$) P% /o C0)0**() 0 E;"%&"#%0&, P&

8/11/2019 15.3.2013ORDER(SP)

10/11



Sh.9.B.S. 9undalF 7026, Sector >,5ohali Pb4 #Appellant


/o "5, 5andi Board,5oga

6. =irst Appellate Authorit(/o "5, 5andi Board,5oga. # Respondents

APPEAL CASE NO.16>6/!1

Present ) Sh.9.B.S. 9undal, $omplainant in person ->322264Sh. Surinder Pal Singh, Gen, -3017-7-4

15.3.2013order(sp)

Documents