154 icrera2013 spain
DESCRIPTION
TehnicTRANSCRIPT
A PHOTOVOLTAIC PANEL MODEL IN
MATLAB/SIMULINK
Shivananda Pukhrem ,MSc.
[email protected],[email protected] Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Program: Renewable Energy System
Wroclaw University of Technology, 27 Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego St., 50-370 Wrocław, Poland
Abstract- A circuit based simulation model for
a PV cell for estimating the IV characteristic
curves of photovoltaic panel with respect to
changes on environmental parameters
(temperature and irradiance) and cell
parameters (parasitic resistance and ideality
factor).This paper could be used to analyze in
the development of MPPT (maximum power
point tracking) algorithm. Using a Shockley
diode equation, an accurate simulink PV
panel model is developed. 60W Solarex
MSX60 PV panel is chosen for evaluating the
developed model.
Index terms -Photovoltaic (PV), Shockley
diode, irradiance, Matlab/Simulink, IV and
PV curves & MPPT
I. Introduction
Photovoltaic (PV) energy has become one of
the promising technologies to use as
distributed generators [1].In PV plant, the
optimum efficiency is affected mainly by
three factors: the efficiency of the PV panel
(in commercial PV panels it is between 8-15
%[2]), the efficiency of the inverter (95-
98%[3]) and the efficiency of the maximum
power point tracking (MPPT) algorithm
(which is over 98%[4]).Improving the
efficiency of panels and inverter is not easy
as it depends on the technology availability
and expenses, however improving the MPPT
algorithm is an inexpensive way. This paper
allows a researcher to develop a better
MPPT algorithm by understanding the PV
panel behavior under different conditions
(environmental as well as the cell
parameters).
II. Physics of Photovoltaic cell
A simple solar cell consist of solid state p-n
junction fabricated from a semiconductor
material (usually silicon).In dark, the IV
characteristic of a solar cell has an
exponential characteristic similar to that of a
diode[5]. However when the solar energy
(photons) hits on the solar cell, energy
greater than the band gap energy of the
semiconductor, and release electrons from
the atoms in the semiconductor material,
creating electron-hole pairs [6].The charged
carrier are moved apart under the influence
of internal electric fields of the p-n junction
and hence a current proportional to the
incident photon radiation is developed. This
phenomenon is called photovoltaic effect,
first observed by A.E Becquerel in
1839.When the cell is short circuited, these
current flows in the external circuit but when
open circuited, this current is shunted
internally by the intrinsic p-n junction diode.
In this paper, a variable load is connected in
the external short circuit. The complete
model is available in [8].
A. A PV cell model
A simplest equivalent circuit of a solar cell
is a current source in parallel with a diode.
The output of the current source is directly
proportional to the solar energy (photons)
that hits on the solar cell (photocurrent ).
During darkness, the solar cell is not an
active device; it works as a diode, i.e. p-n
junction. It produces neither a current nor a
voltage. However, if it is allowed to connect
to an external source (large voltage) it
978-1-4799-1464-7/13/$31.00 ©2013 IEEE
2nd International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Applications Madrid, Spain, 20-23 October 2013
ICRERA 2013
generates a current , called diode (D)
current or diode current. The diode
determines IV characteristic.
Fig: 1 Circuit diagram of a PV cell [9].
The circuit diagram of a PV cell is shown
above in Fig 1.Accurate simulation is
obtained after considering the following
parameters:
Temperature dependence of the
diode reserved saturation current Is.
Temperature dependence of the
photo current Iph.
Series resistance Rs [9] (internal
losses due to the current flow) which
gives a more accurate shape between
the maximum power point and the
open circuit voltage.
Shunt resistance Rsh [9], in parallel
with the diode, this corresponds to
the leakage current to the ground.
Equations which define the model of a PV
cell are given below [9], [10]:
1.
(1)
2.
(2)
3.
(3)
4.
(4)
5.
(5)
6.
(6)
7. (7)
8. (8)
Used V. Nomenclature from page-6 for the
(1)-(8) equations variables.
Fig 2 shows the characteristic of IV curve.
The net current I is obtained from the photo
current Iph and the diode current Id [11].
Fig: 2 Characteristic of IV curve from Iph and [11].
B. IV curve for a PV cell
Fig: 3 Current-Voltage (IV) curve for a PV cell [9].
A general I-V characteristic of the solar cell
for a given ambient irradiation ‘G’ and fixed
cell temperature ‘T’ is shown in Fig 3.For a
certain resistive load, the load characteristic
is a straight line with slope
. Power
delivered to the load depends on the value of
the resistance only. In some cases if the R
load is very small; the PV cell operates in
the M-N region of the IV curve (Fig3), the
PV cell act as a constant current source,
which is almost equivalent to a short circuit
current.
2nd International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Applications Madrid, Spain, 20-23 October 2013
ICRERA 2013
However, if the R load is large, the PV cell
operates in the P-S region of the IV curve,
the PV cell act as a constant voltage source
almost equivalent to the open circuit voltage
[9].A PV cell is characterized by the
following fundamental parameters w.r.t Fig3
1. Short circuit current: = (Greatest
value of the current generated by a PV
cell, which is produced by the short
circuit condition: V=0.
2. Open circuit voltage is a voltage drop
across the diode D when the generated
current I=0.It presumes the voltage of the
PV cell in the night and it is expressed by
(2).
3. Maximum power point is the operating
point in Fig 3,where the
power dissipated in the resistive load is
maximum:
4. Maximum efficiency is the ratio of the
maximum power and the incident solar
energy (photons).
where is the ambient irradiation and A
is the PV cell area.
5. Fill factor (FF) is the ratio of the
maximum power that can be delivered to
the load and the theoretical maximum
power which is the product of
and
.FF is a
measure of real I-V characteristic which
value much be higher than 0.7 for a good
PV cell.
However FF decreases as the cell
temperature increases. The open circuit
voltage increases logarithmically with the
ambient irradiation where as the short circuit
current is a linear function of the ambient
irradiation. The prominent effect with
increasing the PV cell’s temperature is the
linear decrease of the open circuit voltage,
hence making the PV cell less efficient. The
short circuit current slightly increases with
the cell temperature.
C. Consideration of environmental
parameters and cell parameters in PV cell
model
i. Environmental parameters (temperature
and irradiance): The influence of the cell
temperature T and the ambient irradiation
G on the cell characteristics can be
obtained from the model equations. From
equation (7) photo current (A) is a
function of the ambient irradiation G
(W/ ) and from equation (2) cell
temperature (K) is linear decrease of
the . At STC (Standard Test
Condition, G= 1 kW/m at spectral
distribution of AM =1.5; = 25ºC)
= from (7) which is the greatest
current, since = 25ºC for all test
conditions. From (7) as G increases the
increases but from (2) as the
increases the decreases. Influence
of , which is the change in panel per
ºC at temperatures other than 25°C, in (7)
is greater when changes from
(=25°C).
ii. Cell parameters (parasitic resistance and
ideality factor): Resistive effects in solar
cells reduce the efficiency of the solar cell
by dissipating power in the resistances.
The most common parasitic resistances
are series resistance and shunt resistance
whose key impact is to reduce the fill
factor. Both the magnitude and impact of
series and shunt resistance depends on the
geometry of the solar cell, at the
operating point of the solar cell. It is
measured in Ω . For an ideal condition
(ideal diode characteristic), and
[10]. Series resistance in a
solar cell has three causes: the movement
of current through the emitter and base of
the solar cell; the contact resistance
between the metal contact and the silicon;
and the resistance of the top and rear
metal contacts. A straight forward of
estimating the series resistance from a
2nd International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Applications Madrid, Spain, 20-23 October 2013
ICRERA 2013
solar cell is to find the slope of the IV curve
at the point [12]. Significant power
losses caused by the presence of a shunt
resistance are typically due to
manufacturing defects, rather than poor solar
cell design. An estimate for the value of the
of a solar cell can be determined from the
slope of the IV curve near the point [12].
The ideality factor n of a diode is a measure
of how closely the diode follows the ideal
diode equation. The ideal diode equation
assumes that all the recombination occurs
via band to band or recombination via traps
in the bulk areas from the device (i.e. not in
the junction).However recombination does
occur in other ways and in other areas of the
device. This recombination’s produce
ideality factors n that deviate from the ideal
[12].
D. A PV panel simulation model
Considering the environmental and cell
parameters, a PV panel (Solarex MSX 60 W)
model based on equations (1)-(8) and
Tables. (1, 2) is developed in
MATLAB/SIMLINK with a variable load
resistance at the output. To begin, typical
electrical characteristics of 60W Solarex
MSX60 [13] shown in Table 1.is used as an
initial declaration value before simulating.
Table 1: Typical Electrical Characteristics [13]
Parameters Panel MSX-60
Max. power Pmpp,at STC 60 W
Voltage @Pmax(Vmpp) ,at STC 17.1 V
Current @ Pmax(Impp) ,at STC 3.5 A
Guaranteed minimum Pmax 58 W
Short-circuit current (Isc) 3.8 A
Open-circuit voltage (Voc) 21.1 V
Temperature coefficient of
open-circuit voltage, KV
-(80±10)mV/°C
Temperature coefficient of
short-circuit current, KI
(0.065±0.015)%/°C
Temperature coefficient of power,
KP
–(0.5±0.05)%/°C
No. of polycrystalline silicon
solar cells, C
36
Band-gap energy of the
cell(silicon)
1.12eV
Now in Fig: 4 depict the set up of PV panel
simulation model.
Fig: 4 A PV cell simulation set up
Also some calculated data for Solarex MSX-
60W [13] which is important for initial
declaration and is shown in Table.2
Table 2: The calculated data of the parameters for the
Solarex MSX-60 at 25°C,A.M 1.5, and 1 kW/ [14]
Parameters Calculated Values
2.002 x A
3.8 A
0.18 Ω
360.002 Ω
n 1.36
III. Simulation results
After changing , and n
different results are obtained. Table.3 shows
the calculated data from the simulated model
[8] at STC.Table.3 can be compared with
Table.1 for evalating the simulation
results.And Fig: 5 and Fig: 6 shows the
validation of the simulated model.
Table 3: The calculated data from the simulated model for
Solarex MSX-60 at STC
Parameters Calculated values
Peak Power (Pmpp) 59.39 W
Peak Voltage (Vmpp) 16.65 V
Peak Current (Impp) 3.568 A
Fig: 5 Power vs Voltage curve showing the Pmpp and
Vmpp as Y and X coordinate respectively at STC.
0 5 10 15 200
10
20
30
40
50
60
Volatge V
Pow
er W
Power vs Voltage curve at STC
X: 16.65
Y: 59.39
Power vs Voltage
2nd International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Applications Madrid, Spain, 20-23 October 2013
ICRERA 2013
Fig: 6 Current vs Voltage curve showing the Impp
and Vmpp as Y and X coordinate respectively at STC.
Fig: 7 shows the IV curves at different
irradiance G (W/ ) with constant
=25ºC and AM=1.5.
Fig: 7 IV curves at different G
Fig: 8 shows the IV curves at different
(ºC) with constant G=1000 W/ and
AM=1.5.
Fig: 8 IV curves at different Top
Fig: 9 shows the IV curves at different
under STC with =360 ohm.
Fig: 9 IV curves at different
Fig: 10 shows the IV curves at different
under STC with =0.18 ohm.
Fig: 10 IV curves at different
Fig: 11 shows the IV curves at different
under STC with =0.18 ohm and =360
ohm.
Fig: 11 IV curves at different n
0 5 10 15 20 250
1
2
3
4
X: 16.65
Y: 3.568
Volatge V
Curr
ent
A
Current vs Voltage curve at STC
Current vs Voltage
0 5 10 15 20 250
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
Volatge V
Curr
ent
A
Top=25°C and different Irradiance
G=1000 W/m2
G=800 W/m2
G=600 W/m2
G=400 W/m2
G=200 W/m2
0 5 10 15 20 250
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
Volatge V
Curr
ent
A
Under G=1000 W/sq.m and different Top
Top=0°C
Top=25°C
Top=50°C
Top=75°C
Top=100°C
0 5 10 15 20 250
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
Volatge V
Curr
ent
A
Under STC with Rp=360 ohm and diff. parasitic series resistor(Rs)
Rs=0 ohm
Rs=0.18 ohm
Rs=0.36 ohm
Rs=0.54 ohm
Rs=0.72 ohm
0 5 10 15 20 250
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
Volatge V
Curr
ent
A
Under STC with Rp=360 ohm and diff. parasitic shunt resistor(Rp)
Rp=5 ohm
Rp=10 ohm
Rp=50 ohm
Rp=360 ohm
Rp=1000 ohm
0 5 10 15 20 250
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
Volatge V
Cur
rent
A
Under STC with Rs=0.18 ohm Rp=360 ohm and at different n
n=1.18
n=1.36
n=1.54
n=1.72
n=1.90
2nd International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Applications Madrid, Spain, 20-23 October 2013
ICRERA 2013
IV. Conclusion
From the simulation results which are
depicted in figures (9)-(11), the
variables , , , and n which affects
the performance of a PV panel is studied
thoroughly. In addition to it, these results
could be used to develop the MPPT
algorithm by understanding how these
variables work. The ideal condition for
obtaining the maximum power from the PV
panel are =25ºC,
A.M=1.5, =0.18 ohm,
and n=1.36 which are shown in Fig: 5, Fig:
6 and Fig: 7 (with legend G=1000 W/ ,
blue color). This ideal condition is also
specified in the Solarex MSX-60 datasheet
[13].Every manufacture intends to produce
their PV panel in the ideal condition as
mentioned above. Hence this paper is a
summary for understanding the behavior of
PV panel with change of the said variables
and also in estimating the IV curves under
such changes.
V. Nomenclature
STC: Standard Test Condition, G= 1kW/ at spectral
distribution of AM=1.5 =25ºC
: Solar irradiance ratio =
,
: Thermal Voltage, V
: Boltzmann’s constant, 1.38e-23
: Cell operating temperature in ºC
: Cell temperature at 25ºC
: Electron Charge constant, 1.6e-19 C
: Diode reversed saturation current, A
: Diode reversed saturation current at
I: Output current from the PV panel, A
: Shunt current, A
V: Output voltage from the PV panel, V
n: Diode ideality factor,1.36
C: No of cells in a PV panel, 36
: No of PV panel in series & parallel
A.M= Air mass coefficient.
VI. References
[1] Gudimetla, B. Katiraei, F. ; Aguero, J.R. ; Enslin,
J.H.R. ; Alatrash, H. “Integration of micro-scale
photovoltaic distributed generation on power
distribution systems: Dynamic analyses”,
Transmission and Distribution Conference and
Exposition (T&D), 2012 IEEE PES.
[2] “Trends in photovoltaic applications. Survey
report of selected IEA countries between 1992 and
2009”, International Energy Agency, Report IEA-
PVPS Task 1 T1-19:2010, 2010
[3] “Sunny Family 2010/2011 - the Future of Solar
Technology”, SMA product catalogue,2010
[4] L. Piegari, R. Rizzo, "Adaptive perturb and
observe algorithm for photovoltaic maximum
power point tracking," Renewable Power
Generation, IET, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 317-328, July
2010.
[5] G. Walker, "Evaluating MPPT converter
topologies using a MATLAB PV model,” Journal
of Electrical & Electronics Engineering,
Australia,IEAust, vol.21, No. 1, 2001, pp.49-56.
[6] Lorenzo, E. (1994), “Solar Electricity Engineering
of Photovoltaic Systems”, Artes Graficas Gala,
S.L., Spain.
[7] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A._E._Becquerel
[8] http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexch
ange/41537-a-photovoltaic-panel-model-in-
matlabsimulink
[9] Francisco M. González-Longat - 2do congreso
iberoamericano de estudiantes de ingeniería
eléctrica, electrónica y computación, “Model of
Photovoltaic Module in Matlab” (II CIBELEC
2005).
[10] J.A. Ramos-Hernanz,J.J. Campayo ,J. Larranaga ,
E. Zulueta ,O. Barambones ,J. Motrico ,U.
Fernandez Gamiz, I. Zamora, “Two photovoltaic
cell simulation models in Matlab/Simulink ”-
(IJTPE), Iss. 10, Vol. 4, No. 1, Mar. 2012
[11] Marcelo Gradella Villalva, Jonas Rafael Gazoli,
and Ernesto Ruppert Filho. “Comprehensive
Approach to Modeling and Simulation of
Photovoltaic Arrays” -IEEE Transactions on
power electronics, vol. 24, no. 5, May 2009
[12] http://www.pveducation.org/pvcdrom/solar-cell-
operation/
[13] http://californiasolarcenter.org/ssh.html/newssh/pd
fs/Solarex-MSX64.pdf
[14] Dominique Bonkoungou, Zacharie
Koalaga,Donatien Njomo, “Modeling and
Simulation of photovoltaic module considering
single-diode equivalent circuit model in
MATLAB”- (IJETAE), Iss.3 Vol. 3, March 2013
2nd International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Applications Madrid, Spain, 20-23 October 2013
ICRERA 2013
Report on general overview of the implemented simulation model
I. Introduction
A simulation PV panel model based on 60W
Solarex MSX60 is developed using a single
diode design. Many research papers on
single diode designed are presented []. In
this report, a detailed construction and
analysis of the said PV panel will present.
To begin, typical electrical characteristics of
60W Solarex MSX60 [1]-[4] shown in Table
1.is used as an initial declaration value
before simulating.
Table 1: Typical Electrical Characteristics []
Parameters Panel MSX-60 Max. power Pmax 60 W
Voltage @Pmax(Vmp) 17.1 V
Current @ Pmax(Imp) 3.5 A
Guaranteed minimum Pmax 58 W
Short-circuit current (Isc) 3.8 A
Open-circuit voltage (Voc) 21.1 V
Temperature coefficient of
open-circuit voltage, KV
-(80±10)mV/°C
Temperature coefficient of
short-circuit current, KI
(0.065±0.015)%/°
C
Temperature coefficient of
power, KP
–(0.5±0.05)%/°C
No. of polycrystalline silicon
solar cells, C
36
Band-gap energy of the
cell(silicon)
1.12eV
II. Modeling
From the said research paper [1]-[4], an
important equation to model a PV panel with
reference to 60W Solarex MSX60 is given
below. They are:
1.
(1)
2.
(2)
3.
(3)
4.
(4)
5.
(5)
6.
(6)
7. (7)
8. (8)
Nomenclature for the above variables in
equations are given below,
STC: Standard Test Condition, G= 1kW/ at spectral
distribution of AM=1.5 =25ºC
: Solar irradiance ratio =
,
: Thermal Voltage, V
: Boltzmann’s constant, 1.38e-23
: Diode current
: Cell operating temperature in ºC
: Cell temperature at 25ºC
: Electron Charge constant, 1.6e-19 C
: Diode reversed saturation current, A
: Diode reversed saturation current at
I: Output current from the PV panel, A
: Shunt current, A
: Phase Current, A
V: Output voltage from the PV panel, V
n: Diode ideality factor,1.36
C: No of cells in a PV panel, 36
: No of PV panel in series & parallel
Following figures depict the corresponding
equations as given above .They are shown
below:
Fig: 1 Thermal voltage (eqn 1)
Thermal Voltage Eqn
[q]
[k]
[Vt][Top]
2nd International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Applications Madrid, Spain, 20-23 October 2013
ICRERA 2013
Fig: 2 Diode current (eqn 3)
Fig: 3 Diode reversed saturation current (eqn 4)
Fig: 4 Diode reversed saturation current at , (eqn 5)
Fig: 5 Shunt Current (eqn 6)
Fig: 6 Phase Current (eqn 7)
Fig: 7 Output current from the PV panel I (eqn 8)
The voltage V (shown in green) is developed
by loading variable resistor across the PV
panel terminal. Hence the output current I
(shown in green) flow through this variable
resistor which allows in obtaining the most
important I-V characteristics of a PV panel.
The connection arrangement is given in [4].
Fig: 8 Mode of connection [4].
The connection arrangement of the simulation model
is shown below.
Fig: 9 A Complete model for simulation.
Diode Current Eqn
[n]
[C]
[Vt]
[Rs]e
u
[Np]
[Is]
[Ns]
[V]
[I]
[Id]
Diode current1
Reversed saturation Current Eqn
[k]
[q]
[Eg]
eu
[Tref]
[Top]
[Tref]
[Top]
[Irs]
1
1
[Is]
Reversed saturation current
[n]
Reversed Saturation Current at Top Eqn
[n]
[Top]
[C]
[q]
[k]
[Voc]
eu
[Isc][Irs]
Irs
1
Shunt Current Eqn
[Ish]
Shunt current[Rs]
[Rp]
[V]
[I]
Phase Current Eqn
[Iph]
Phase current
[Isc]
[Tref]
[Top]
[KI]
[Gk]
Load Current Eqn
[Np]
[Ish]
[Id]
[Iph]
[I]
1.36
n
V+
-
Voltage Sensor
PS+
-
Variable Resistor
25+273.15
Temperature_op
f(x)=0
Solver
Configuration
PSS
PSS
0.18
Rs
360.002
Rp
Ramp
V
G
Top
Rs
Rp
n
I
PV panel
PS S
PSS
G
Irradiance(p.u)
(W/m2)
[V]
[V]
Electrical Reference
+ -
Diode
I+
-
Current Sensor
Controlled Current
Source
2nd International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Applications Madrid, Spain, 20-23 October 2013
ICRERA 2013
The signal routing GOTO and FROM is
used for the above models from Simulink
library browser. A SimElectronics library is
used to model the complete simulation
scheme shown in Fig 9. The complete .mdl
file of the above simulation can be
downloaded from [5].
III. Simulation model validation
As mention in the paper “A
PHOTOVOLTAIC PANEL MODEL IN
MATLAB/SIMULINK” following
simulation results is obtaining which could
be compared with the Solarex MSX 60 PV
panel. For an instance comparison on the
basis of variation of I-V characteristic curve
under the change of operating temperature at
STC is given below.
Fig: 10 Solarex MSX-60 I-V Characteristic curves at STC.
Fig: 11 Simulated Solarex MSX-60 I-V Characteristic
curves at STC
From the figures 9 and 10, it can be
concluded that at 25°C under STC both the
characteristic curve behaves the same. And it
also be noted that at 25°C under STC, from
figure 10 the = 21.06 V which is closed
to 21.1 V as mentioned in table .1
Table.2 shows the calculated data from the
simulated model [6] at STC.Table.2 can be
compared with Table.1 for evalating the
simulation results.
Table. 2 The calculated data from the simulated model for
Solarex MSX-60 at STC Parameters Calculated values
Peak Power (Pmpp) 59.39 W
Peak Voltage (Vmpp) 16.65 V
Peak Current (Impp) 3.568 A
The following figures are obtained after
simulation of the model for Solarex MSX-60
at STC.
Fig: 12 Power vs Voltage curve showing the Pmpp and
Vmpp.as Y and X coordinate respectively.
Fig: 13 Current vs Voltage curve showing the Impp and
Vmpp as Y and X coordinates respectively.
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 220
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
X: 21.06
Y: 0.0372
Volatge V
Curr
ent
A
Under G=1000 W/sq.m and different Top
Top=100°C
Top=75°C
Top=50°C
Top=25°C
Top=0°C
0 5 10 15 200
10
20
30
40
50
60
Volatge V
Pow
er
WPower vs Voltage curve at STC
X: 16.65
Y: 59.39
Power vs Voltage
0 5 10 15 20 250
1
2
3
4
X: 16.65
Y: 3.568
Volatge V
Curr
ent
A
Current vs Voltage curve at STC
Current vs Voltage
2nd International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Applications Madrid, Spain, 20-23 October 2013
ICRERA 2013
VI. References
[1] Francisco M. González-Longat - 2do congreso
iberoamericano de estudiantes de ingeniería
eléctrica, electrónica y computación, “Model of
Photovoltaic Module in Matlab” (II CIBELEC
2005).
[2] J.A. Ramos-Hernanz,J.J. Campayo ,J. Larranaga ,
E. Zulueta ,O. Barambones ,J. Motrico ,U.
Fernandez Gamiz, I. Zamora, “Two photovoltaic
cell simulation models in Matlab/Simulink ”-
(IJTPE), Iss. 10, Vol. 4, No. 1, Mar. 2012
[3] Dominique Bonkoungou, Zacharie
Koalaga,Donatien Njomo, “Modeling and
Simulation of photovoltaic module considering
single-diode equivalent circuit model in
MATLAB”- (IJETAE), Iss.3 Vol. 3, March 2013
[4] Rajesh Gupta, Gaurang Gupta, Dharmendra
Kastwar, Amir Hussain and Hars Ranjan,
“Modeling and Design of MPPT Controller for a
PV Module using PSCAD/EMTDC”.
[5] http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexch
ange/41537-a-photovoltaic-panel-model-in-
matlabsimulink
[6] http://californiasolarcenter.org/ssh.html/newssh/pd
fs/Solarex-MSX64.pdf
(IC- UC3844) PWM charging technique”.
Shivananda Pukhrem, is Master of
Science under the program “Renewable
Energy System” from Wroclaw University of
Technology, Poland. He passed out in 2013,
July with a master thesis in “Investigation
into algorithms of photovoltaic array
maximum power point tracking.” He is
specializing in Solar PV system and has
strong interest on it. He did his bachelor of
“Electrical and Electronics Engineering”
from Visvesvaraya Technological
University, India. His bachelor final year
project was “12 Volt-10 Ampere solar
charge controller using current mode
2nd International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Applications Madrid, Spain, 20-23 October 2013
ICRERA 2013