17 february 2011 future shape: learning in sheffield changes in government policy and our response...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: 17 February 2011 Future Shape: Learning in Sheffield Changes in Government Policy and Our Response DRAFT](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071717/56649e315503460f94b2261a/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
17 February 2011
Future Shape: Learning in Sheffield
Changes in Government Policy and Our Response
DRAFT
![Page 2: 17 February 2011 Future Shape: Learning in Sheffield Changes in Government Policy and Our Response DRAFT](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071717/56649e315503460f94b2261a/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Purpose of today’s briefing
• (1) Set out the key points from the changing direction of national policy and the new legislation
• (2) Highlight the crucial implications for the city’s education system and progress in developing a new relationship with schools
![Page 3: 17 February 2011 Future Shape: Learning in Sheffield Changes in Government Policy and Our Response DRAFT](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071717/56649e315503460f94b2261a/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
(1) The Schools White Paper set out significant changes to every aspect of the education system
Teaching and Leadership
Behaviour
Curriculum and assessment
Accountability
School Improvement
Funding
Key changes from The importance of Teaching
• Determination to focus on quality of teachers and teaching
• More emphasis on quality of new entrants - reform teacher training, new network of Teaching Schools, expand Teach First, raise entry bar
• Good behaviour as a key driver of good teacher retention – strengthen powers and deregulate
• Focus OFSTED more on behaviour, particularly bullying, and improve alternative provision
• Introduction of the English Baccalaureate and reviews of National Curriculum, Foundation Stage, vocational learning and and continued commitment to Raising Participation Age
• Raise primary and secondary floor targets and more emphasis on progression. Higher expectations for disadvantaged pupils the underlying objective behind scrapping CVA
• Schools much more in control of improvement (Teaching Schools, National, Local Leaders) – Councils trading services if demand is there
• Pupil Premium for disadvantaged pupils – significant part of future funding framework
• Consultation on new NATIONAL Funding Formula Spring 2011; much greater transparency over school spend
![Page 4: 17 February 2011 Future Shape: Learning in Sheffield Changes in Government Policy and Our Response DRAFT](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071717/56649e315503460f94b2261a/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
(1) Redefining the roles of schools and councils by setting a clear ambition around academies
“It is our ambition that Academy status should be the norm for all state schools…….”
New Roles
“local authorities will have a strong strategic role as champions for parents and families …….
• Restore Academy freedoms
• Rapid expansion at secondary and primary and legislate for PRUs
• Lower threshold for conversion
• Including open to lower performing if in partnership – e.g. Academy Chains
• Councils continue to coordinate admissions
• Champion for vulnerable pupils, particularly SEND
• Define own role in school improvement
• Move towards strategic commissioner role
“As champions of excellence, local authorities will be expected to take action if there are concerns about the performance of any school…….”
“if you have a school that is performing well and is happy with its arrangement with the local authority then why muck around…….” (M Gove, interview to FT, Nov 2010)
![Page 5: 17 February 2011 Future Shape: Learning in Sheffield Changes in Government Policy and Our Response DRAFT](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071717/56649e315503460f94b2261a/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
(1) The Education Bill provides the legal base, although for Academies this is largely in place
School Organisation/Academies
Behaviour
Inspection, intervention and improvement
Infrastructure and influence
• Presumption that all new schools academies and for creation/conversion of PRUs and 16-19 Academies, easier to leave federations
• Education Secretary already can convert schools that are failing
• Outstanding schools and FE colleges exempt from inspection
• SoS can direct a school causing concern to close
• No longer requirement for SIP
Details of selected key clauses
• Significant extension to search pupils without consent
• Restrict power of Exclusion Appeals Panels to reinstate
• Repeal of Behaviour and Attendance partnerships
• Increasingly, direct relationship between schools (Academies) and Department for Education
• Removal of duty to cooperate and have regard to Children’s Plan
• Abolition of 4 Education Quangos – functions back to DfE
![Page 6: 17 February 2011 Future Shape: Learning in Sheffield Changes in Government Policy and Our Response DRAFT](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071717/56649e315503460f94b2261a/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
(2) There are three overall reasons why we need to think carefully about the future
Standards of education in Sheffield need to continue to rise faster than the national average if all young people are to be prepared for the future economy and for life – and the gap between rich and poor is not getting
any narrower
The education system is about to experience its greatest change for a generation alongside major reductions in public service funding for
children’s services
We need a creative and collective Sheffield response to these changes and challenges
![Page 7: 17 February 2011 Future Shape: Learning in Sheffield Changes in Government Policy and Our Response DRAFT](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071717/56649e315503460f94b2261a/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
(2) We have made a good start in redefining the relationship with schools
• 78% of head teachers from Sheffield’s schools met to discuss the future of learning and support services for children and young people
• Consensus to avoid school system becoming fragmented, but that services needed to improve
• Concluded by proposing some broad models for future collaboration – majority of schools wanted some form of partnership
20 OctoberDon Valley
9-10 NovemberChaucer School
• 2 days intensive work with head teachers, SASGB, council officers, young people and parents
• Developed collective vision and three models:– New model for delivering services to children and families– Groups of schools collaborating on school improvement and shaping services– Development of a City Wide Learning Body
19 November and beyond
• Further event at Don Valley (57% of heads) led to broad agreement that the 3 models developed further
• Work divided up into 3 strands to be taken forward jointly with heads
![Page 8: 17 February 2011 Future Shape: Learning in Sheffield Changes in Government Policy and Our Response DRAFT](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071717/56649e315503460f94b2261a/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
(2) Including looking at a system that fosters collaboration at every level alongside autonomy….
Structure and accountability
[DfE]
city wide learning body City wide
Community level responsibility 0-16
(Groups of schools and children centres)
Strong institutional accountability (school level)
Based on proposals from Don Valley and Chaucer school events
National
Learners and families at the centre of the system
![Page 9: 17 February 2011 Future Shape: Learning in Sheffield Changes in Government Policy and Our Response DRAFT](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071717/56649e315503460f94b2261a/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
(2) …and enables a secure transition to a world where schools have greater choice over services
Therapies + health related support
Sims
Financial servicesPremises
ICT Management
Human resource
Insurance
Governors service
Study support
School improvementHospital and home education
CPDSchool workforce developmentE-learning Vocational learning Early Years
Educational Psychology
Home/school travel service Inclusion Service Independent special schools fees/out of city placements
Specialist learning support
Mental health services
Admissions
Youth work and positive activities
Connexions
Travellers’ service
Community cohesion
Youth justice Family support
MAST
Bu
sin
ess
S
erv
ice
sS
up
po
rt
Le
arn
ing
Ad
diti
on
al
ne
ed
sE
xte
rna
l Su
pp
ort
fo
r yo
un
g p
eo
ple
a
nd
fa
mili
es
Examples of services (not exhaustive)
Currently the council is a significant provider of services to schools
This will change over time - schools will purchase from a mix of providers and play an active role in shaping services locally in partnership with others
![Page 10: 17 February 2011 Future Shape: Learning in Sheffield Changes in Government Policy and Our Response DRAFT](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071717/56649e315503460f94b2261a/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
(2) Central to our vision is a City Wide Body – with form and functions under development
Likely form
POSSIBLE Functions
•With the following partners central to setting direction
-Schools
-Council
-Parents
-Young people
-Governors
Executive and delegated functions
Some form of legal status
• Key strategic body for education for 0-19 year olds in the city
• Commissioning of specialist services for greater efficiency and impact
• Monitoring, tracking and challenging performance – spreading best practice and innovation
Design principles
• Focuses on world class education for all and on closing attainment gap
• Enables greater school autonomy while providing framework for collaboration
• Creates equal partnership across education institutions, services, parents and young people
• Not a talking shop - “with teeth”
![Page 11: 17 February 2011 Future Shape: Learning in Sheffield Changes in Government Policy and Our Response DRAFT](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071717/56649e315503460f94b2261a/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
(2) We will continue to develop these proposals over a transitional period
Interim Board
• Oversee transition to new model of service delivery
• Act as representative body for schools, parents, young people and services in responding to pressing policy and resource changes now
• Act as prototype for new framework of collaboration across the key partners involved in education
• Advisory in first instance
Timeline
• Establishment of Interim Board – February 2011
• Transition period for council run services – move to commercialised approach (now – April 2012)
• Agreement on precise form and function of City Wide Learning Body – September 2011
• Formal establishment of a City Wide Body – April 2012