17 g triebig sensory irritation in human volunteers

39
UniversityHospital Heidelberg Formaldehyde and chemosensory effects in hyper- and hyposensitive volunteers G. Triebig, J. U. Mueller, T. Bruckner Formaldehyde Science Conference 19-20 April 2012 Madrid, Spain Institute and Outpatient Clinic for Occupational and Social Medicine University of Heidelberg

Upload: egdlabs

Post on 18-Apr-2015

1.201 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

G Triebig Sensory irritation in human volunteers

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 17 G Triebig Sensory Irritation in Human Volunteers

UniversityHospital Heidelberg

Formaldehyde and chemosensory effects in hyper- and hyposensitive

volunteers

G. Triebig, J. U. Mueller, T. Bruckner

Formaldehyde Science Conference

19-20 April 2012

Madrid, Spain

Institute and Outpatient Clinic forOccupational and Social Medicine

University of Heidelberg

Page 2: 17 G Triebig Sensory Irritation in Human Volunteers

UniversityHospital Heidelberg

Objectivesto examine chemosensory effects of formaldehyde

� on hyper- and hyposensitive healthy, non smoking men

� symptoms and findings on eyes, nose and olfactory function

� exposed to concentrations typical for workplaces: up to 0.8 ppm

Page 3: 17 G Triebig Sensory Irritation in Human Volunteers

UniversityHospital Heidelberg

Subjects

� 41 men

� 32 +/- 10 years old

� students and unemployed persons

� exclusion criteria:

� severe illness, insufficient German language skills, use of contact lens, exposure to formaldehyde

The Study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the

Medical Faculty of the University of Heidelberg

Page 4: 17 G Triebig Sensory Irritation in Human Volunteers

UniversityHospital Heidelberg

Exposure

� Exposed on 5 consecutive days (Monday to Friday)

� 4 hours daily

� five randomized formaldehyde concentrations / double-blinded

– A: 0.0 ppm (control group)

– B: 0.3 ppm with 0.6 ppm peak (4 x 15 min)

– C: 0.4 ppm with 0.8 ppm peak (4 x 15 min)

– D: 0.5 ppm

– E: 0.7 ppm

cumulative exposure: 8.3 ppm

Page 5: 17 G Triebig Sensory Irritation in Human Volunteers

UniversityHospital Heidelberg

Exposure chamber

�Total capacity about 30 m³ (Length: 4.3 m, Width: 2.9 m, Height: 2.4 m)

�Three ventilation fans were placed to generate homogenous concentrations

�To avoid a decrease of the formaldehyde concentration, the subjects had to cross a floodgate for entering the chamber.

Page 6: 17 G Triebig Sensory Irritation in Human Volunteers

UniversityHospital Heidelberg

exposure chamber

(Exposure chamber)

(Volunteers on cycle ergometer in exposure chamber)

Page 7: 17 G Triebig Sensory Irritation in Human Volunteers

UniversityHospital Heidelberg

Determination of Unspecific nasal Sensitivity (CO2)

� CO2 offers possibility to determine irritation of trigeminal nerve (=sensible nerve supply

e.g. of the nose)

� CO2-application at nasal mucosa evokes stinging, painful sensations (concentration- and

sensitivity-dependent)

� provoked subjective pain intensities - marked on a VA-scale - were used for evaluation of

“individual sum score”, mean value, median and quartiles.

� Separation on basis “of the individual sum score”

� at median 20 hyposensitive and 21 hypersensitive volunteers

� at upper/lower quartile 10 resp. 11 extremely hypo- /hypersensitive subjects

CO2-threshold measurement / Separation into „Sensitivity Groups“

100 mm

none at all unbearable

„Sensation of Pain“

I I

Example of the visual analogue scale (VAS) used for measurement of CO2 threshold

Page 8: 17 G Triebig Sensory Irritation in Human Volunteers

UniversityHospital Heidelberg

Page 9: 17 G Triebig Sensory Irritation in Human Volunteers

UniversityHospital Heidelberg

Determination of Unspecific nasal Sensitivity (CO2)

� CO2 offers possibility to determine irritation of trigeminal nerve (=sensible nerve supply

e.g. of the nose)

� CO2-application at nasal mucosa evokes stinging, painful sensations (concentration- and

sensitivity-dependent)

� provoked subjective pain intensities - marked on a VA-scale - were used for evaluation of

“individual sum score”, mean value, median and quartiles.

� Separation on basis “of the individual sum score”

� at median 20 hyposensitive and 21 hypersensitive volunteers

� at upper/lower quartile 10 resp. 11 extremely hypo- /hypersensitive subjects

CO2-threshold measurement / Separation into „Sensitivity Groups“

100 mm

none at all unbearable

„Sensation of Pain“

I I

Example of the visual analogue scale (VAS) used for measurement of CO2 threshold

Page 10: 17 G Triebig Sensory Irritation in Human Volunteers

UniversityHospital Heidelberg

Examinations:

� Subjective rating

→ Swedish Performance Evaluation System (SPES)

by Gamberale et al. 1989, German version by Seeber et al. 2002

� Photographs of the conjunctival redness

→ grading scale according to Cornea and Contact Lens Research Unit (CCLRU)

� Measurement of blinking frequency

→ new developed method by Ziegler et al. 2007

� Tear film break up time (stopwatch measurement)

� Olfactory function (n-butanol threshold, Sniffin-Sticks)

� Active anterior rhinomanometry

→ nasal flow and resistance

� PANAS (Positive and negative affectivity schedule)

Page 11: 17 G Triebig Sensory Irritation in Human Volunteers

UniversityHospital Heidelberg

SPES I1. Blurred Sight 0 1 2 3 4 5

2. Feeling of fainting or vertigo 0 1 2 3 4 5

3. Pain or pressure over the chest 0 1 2 3 4 5

4. Bad taste in the mouth 0 1 2 3 4 5

5. Sensation of bad air (quality) 0 1 2 3 4 5

6. Irritation of the throat 0 1 2 3 4 5

7. Headache 0 1 2 3 4 5

8. Coughing spells 0 1 2 3 4 5

9. Sensation of unpleasant taste 0 1 2 3 4 5

10. Nasty smell 0 1 2 3 4 5

11. Irritation of the skin 0 1 2 3 4 5

12. Dizziness 0 1 2 3 4 5

13. Shortness of breath 0 1 2 3 4 5

14. Nasty taste 0 1 2 3 4 5

15. Palpitations 0 1 2 3 4 5

16. Sensation of unpleasant smell 0 1 2 3 4 5

17. Nausea 0 1 2 3 4 5

18. Stink 0 1 2 3 4 5

19. Irritation of the nose 0 1 2 3 4 5

20. Itching nose 0 1 2 3 4 5

21. Dry nose 0 1 2 3 4 5

22. Running nose 0 1 2 3 4 5

23. Smarting nose 0 1 2 3 4 5

24. Diplopic images 0 1 2 3 4 5

25. Eyestrain 0 1 2 3 4 5

26. Itching eyes 0 1 2 3 4 5

27. Smarting eyes 0 1 2 3 4 5

28. Irritation of the eyes 0 1 2 3 4 5

29. Dry eyes 0 1 2 3 4 5

30. Watering eyes 0 1 2 3 4 5

31. Redness of the eyes 0 1 2 3 4 5

• 0 = not at all

• 1 = hardly at all

• 2 = somewhat

• 3 = rather much

• 4 = considerably

• 5 = very, very much

Page 12: 17 G Triebig Sensory Irritation in Human Volunteers

UniversityHospital Heidelberg

SPES II

S y m p to m g ro u p S y m p to m sO lfa c to ry s y m p to m s S e n s a t io n o f b a d a ir (q u a lity )

N a s ty s m e ll

S e n s a t io n o f u n p le a s a n t s m e ll

S t in k

N a s a l ir r ita t io n s Irr ita t io n o f th e n o s e

Itc h in g n o s e

D ry n o s e

R u n n in g n o s e

S m a rt in g n o s e

O c u la r ir r ita t io n s E y e s tra in

I tc h in g e y e s

S m a rt in g e y e s

Irr ita t io n o f th e e y e s

D ry e y e s

W a te ry e y e s

R e d n e s s o f th e e y e s

S h a m e s y m p to m s P a lp ita t io n s

D ip lo p ic im a g e s

Page 13: 17 G Triebig Sensory Irritation in Human Volunteers

UniversityHospital Heidelberg

SPES III

Symptom group SymptomsUnspecific symptoms Feeling of fainting or vertigo

Dizziness

Nausea

Not classified Blurred sight

Irritation of the throat

Irritation of the skin

Taste symptoms Bad taste in the mouth

Sensation of unpleasant taste

Nasty taste

Respiratory symptoms Pain or pressure over the chest

Coughing spells

Shortness of breath

Page 14: 17 G Triebig Sensory Irritation in Human Volunteers

UniversityHospital Heidelberg

Examinations:

� Subjective rating

→ Swedish Performance Evaluation System (SPES)

by Gamberale et al. 1989, German version by Seeber et al. 2002

� Photographs of the conjunctival redness

→ grading scale according to Cornea and Contact Lens Research Unit (CCLRU)

� Measurement of blinking frequency

→ new developed method by Ziegler et al. 2007

� Tear film break up time (stopwatch measurement)

� Olfactory function (n-butanol threshold, Sniffin-Sticks)

� Active anterior rhinomanometry

→ nasal flow and resistance

� PANAS (Positive and negative affectivity schedule)

Page 15: 17 G Triebig Sensory Irritation in Human Volunteers

UniversityHospital Heidelberg

Eye redness according to CCLRU

1 = very slight 2 = slight

3 = moderate 4 = severe

Page 16: 17 G Triebig Sensory Irritation in Human Volunteers

UniversityHospital Heidelberg

Examinations:

� Subjective rating

→ Swedish Performance Evaluation System (SPES)

by Gamberale et al. 1989, German version by Seeber et al. 2002

� Photographs of the conjunctival redness

→ grading scale according to Cornea and Contact Lens Research Unit (CCLRU)

� Measurement of blinking frequency

→ new developed method by Ziegler et al. 2007

� Tear film break up time (stopwatch measurement)

� Olfactory function (n-butanol threshold, Sniffin-Sticks)

� Active anterior rhinomanometry

→ nasal flow and resistance

� PANAS (Positive and negative affectivity schedule)

Page 17: 17 G Triebig Sensory Irritation in Human Volunteers

UniversityHospital Heidelberg

examinations and volunteers

(Video recording of eye-blinking frequency)

(Test of olfactory function - „Sniffin Sticks“)

Page 18: 17 G Triebig Sensory Irritation in Human Volunteers

UniversityHospital Heidelberg

Examinations:

� Subjective rating

→ Swedish Performance Evaluation System (SPES)

by Gamberale et al. 1989, German version by Seeber et al. 2002

� Photographs of the conjunctival redness

→ grading scale according to Cornea and Contact Lens Research Unit (CCLRU)

� Measurement of blinking frequency

→ new developed method by Ziegler et al. 2007

� Tear film break up time (stopwatch measurement)

� Olfactory function (n-butanol threshold, Sniffin-Sticks)

� Active anterior rhinomanometry

→ nasal flow and resistance

� PANAS (Positive and negative affectivity schedule)

Page 19: 17 G Triebig Sensory Irritation in Human Volunteers

UniversityHospital Heidelberg

PANAS

Positive affectivity Negative affectivity

Interested

Excited

Strong

Enthusiastic

Proud

Alert

Inspired

Determined

Attentive

Active

Distressed

Upset

Guilty

Scared

Hostile

Irritable

Ashamed

Nervous

Jittery

Afraid

Feelings and emotions were rated as follows: 1 = very slightly or not at

all, 2 = a little, 3 = moderately, 4 = quite a bit, and 5 = extremely

Page 20: 17 G Triebig Sensory Irritation in Human Volunteers

UniversityHospital Heidelberg

Positive and Negative Affectivity Schedule (PANAS)

� Participants offer a higher score for positive PANAS than for negative PANAS.

� PANAS parameters are comparable with published data in general population

� ´Negative affect´ (negative PANAS) was additionally used for statistical evaluation

as covariate

� No relevant influences on subjective or objective findings could be detected

� Therefore the displayed results are based on the statistical calculation without

considering ´negative affect´ as statistically covariate

Statistical Evaluation of the PANAS (= self description tool/questionnaire to characterise positive and negative personal patterns and traits of individuals)

Observations PANAS Mean ± SD Median (Range)

n = 41 positive affect (PA) 3.31 ± 0.60 3.50 (1.80 – 4.50)

n = 41 negative affect (NA) 1.46 ± 0.41 1.40 (1.00 – 2.90)

Page 21: 17 G Triebig Sensory Irritation in Human Volunteers

UniversityHospital Heidelberg

Explanation of box whisker plots

Page 22: 17 G Triebig Sensory Irritation in Human Volunteers

UniversityHospital Heidelberg

Results:

SPES sum score

Page 23: 17 G Triebig Sensory Irritation in Human Volunteers

UniversityHospital Heidelberg

Results:

Eye Irritation

Page 24: 17 G Triebig Sensory Irritation in Human Volunteers

UniversityHospital Heidelberg

Results:

Nasal Irritation

Page 25: 17 G Triebig Sensory Irritation in Human Volunteers

UniversityHospital Heidelberg

Results:

Olfactory Symptoms

Page 26: 17 G Triebig Sensory Irritation in Human Volunteers

UniversityHospital Heidelberg

SPES II

S y m p to m g ro u p S y m p to m sO lfa c to ry s y m p to m s S e n s a t io n o f b a d a ir (q u a lity )

N a s ty s m e ll

S e n s a t io n o f u n p le a s a n t s m e ll

S t in k

N a s a l ir r ita t io n s Irr ita t io n o f th e n o s e

Itc h in g n o s e

D ry n o s e

R u n n in g n o s e

S m a rt in g n o s e

O c u la r ir r ita t io n s E y e s tra in

I tc h in g e y e s

S m a rt in g e y e s

Irr ita t io n o f th e e y e s

D ry e y e s

W a te ry e y e s

R e d n e s s o f th e e y e s

S h a m e s y m p to m s P a lp ita t io n s

D ip lo p ic im a g e s

Page 27: 17 G Triebig Sensory Irritation in Human Volunteers

UniversityHospital Heidelberg

Results:

Perception of Impure Air

Page 28: 17 G Triebig Sensory Irritation in Human Volunteers

UniversityHospital Heidelberg

Results:

Conjunctival Redness

Page 29: 17 G Triebig Sensory Irritation in Human Volunteers

UniversityHospital Heidelberg

Results:

Conjunctival Redness

Page 30: 17 G Triebig Sensory Irritation in Human Volunteers

UniversityHospital Heidelberg

Results:

Blinking Frequency

Page 31: 17 G Triebig Sensory Irritation in Human Volunteers

UniversityHospital Heidelberg

Results:

Tear film Break-Up Time

Page 32: 17 G Triebig Sensory Irritation in Human Volunteers

UniversityHospital Heidelberg

Results:

Nasal Flow

Page 33: 17 G Triebig Sensory Irritation in Human Volunteers

UniversityHospital Heidelberg

Results:

n-Butanol threshold

Page 34: 17 G Triebig Sensory Irritation in Human Volunteers

UniversityHospital Heidelberg

Results:

Sniffin‘Sticks

Page 35: 17 G Triebig Sensory Irritation in Human Volunteers

UniversityHospital Heidelberg

Conclusions

� Formaldehyde concentrations of 0.7 ppm (constant) and 0.8 ppm

(peak) are not associated with chemosensory effects on males

hypo-and hypersensitive to CO2

� Eye and olfactory symptoms occur at concentrations of 0.3 ppm

(constant)

� Our results are in accordance with former review articles of Paustenbach et al. (1997) (1) and Arts et al. (2006) (2)

� Our results confirm the findings of Lang et al. (2008) (3), if the methodologic differences are considered

1 J.Toxicol.Environ.Health 50 (1997) 217-263

2 Regul.Toxicol.Pharmacol. 44 (2006) 144-160

3 Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 50 (2008) 23-36

Page 36: 17 G Triebig Sensory Irritation in Human Volunteers

UniversityHospital Heidelberg

Differences to Lang et al. (2008)

� Varying FA concentrations: higher concentrations up to 1.0 ppm at peaks with Lang et al.

� Different examination times: SPES questionnaire (subjective symptoms) and eye blinking

frequency performed - directly / with interval - after peak exposure or cycle ergometer unit.

� Statistically significant higher ´negative affectivity´

in the study of Lang et al. compared to present study.

� Different rating scales: visual analogue scale (VAS) vs. numerical rating scale (NRS)

� Good correlation between the scales

� VA scales are generally marked with lower values

FA_I FA_II

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

p_neg

studie

* P < 0.02

PA

NA

S „

neg

ati

ve a

ffecti

vit

y“

Trial by Lang et al. Present study

Page 37: 17 G Triebig Sensory Irritation in Human Volunteers

UniversityHospital Heidelberg

Publications

� Isabelle Lang, Thomas Bruckner, Gerhard Triebig: Formaldehyde and chemosensory irritation in humans: A controlled human exposure study, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 50 (2008) 23- 36.

� Joerg U. Mueller, Thomas Bruckner, Gerhard Triebig: Exposure study to examine chemosensory effects of formaldehyde on hyposensitive and hypersensitive males, International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, DOI 10.1007/s00420-012-0745-9.

Page 38: 17 G Triebig Sensory Irritation in Human Volunteers

UniversityHospital Heidelberg

Acknowledgement

We gratefully acknowledge the volunteers for their participation and the following

colleagues for assistance and study advice: Lutz Buchholz, Heinz-Peter Gelbke,

Joerg Haisser, Thomas Hummel, Michael Kentner, Christoph Klingmann, Jutta

Martin, Benno Schuster, Guenter Speit, Rho Thiel, Andrea Vinzens.

The authors thank the FormaCare sector group of CEFIC, Brussels, the European

Panel Federation, Brussels, and the Verband der Deutschen

Holzwerkstoffindustrie e.V., Gießen, for their financial support of this study.

Page 39: 17 G Triebig Sensory Irritation in Human Volunteers

UniversityHospital Heidelberg

Thank you for your attention!Thank you for your attention!Thank you for your attention!Thank you for your attention!