17-laboratory evaluation of urinary tr act infection v1- 3

Upload: shaoran-aulia

Post on 09-Apr-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/8/2019 17-Laboratory Evaluation of Urinary Tr Act Infection v1- 3

    1/33

    Laboratory Evaluation of

    Urinary Tract InfectionDr. John R. Warren

    Department of Pathology

    Northwestern UniversityFeinberg School of Medicine

    June 2007

  • 8/8/2019 17-Laboratory Evaluation of Urinary Tr Act Infection v1- 3

    2/33

    Essential Elements of Urine

    Cultures Pathophysiology of urinary tract

    infection

    Microbiology of urinary tract infection

    Clinical signs and symptoms of urinarytract infection

  • 8/8/2019 17-Laboratory Evaluation of Urinary Tr Act Infection v1- 3

    3/33

    Essential Elements of Urine

    Cultures Technical variables in specimen

    collection and transport

    Interpretation of urine cultures

    Quality management

  • 8/8/2019 17-Laboratory Evaluation of Urinary Tr Act Infection v1- 3

    4/33

    Pathophysiology of urinary tract

    infection Ascending route of infection most common Colonization of urethra and periurethral tissue by

    uropathogens the initial event in urinary tract infection

    Urinary tract infection more common in women than men dueto short female urethra with distention and turbulent flow that

    washes urethral organisms into the bladder during micturitionand in close proximity to perianal areas

    Hospital infection associated with lower urinary tractinstrumentation (catheterization, cystoscopy)

    Once in the bladder uropathogens multiply, then pass up theureters (especially if vesicoureteral reflux present) to the renal

    pelvis and parenchyma Source of uropathogens: enteric bacteria

  • 8/8/2019 17-Laboratory Evaluation of Urinary Tr Act Infection v1- 3

    5/33

    Pathophysiology of urinary tract

    infection Cystitis: localized infection of the bladder with superficialneutrophilic inflammation of the mucosa (lower urinary tractinfection)

    Pyelonephritis: infection of the kidney with acute suppurativeinflammation of the pelvis, medullary and cortical tubules, and

    corticomedullary intersititum (upper urinary tract infection) Urosepsis: bacteremia due to pyelonephritis

    Papillary necrosis: complication of pyelonephritis in diabetesand urinary tract obstruction with coagulative necrosis of renalpyramids and an intense inflammatory response betweenpreserved and necrotic tissue

    Sloughing of necrotic pyr

    amids: complication of papillarynecrosis that can cause urinary tract obstruction (in some

    instances sloughed portions voided and recovered in urine)

    Perinephricabscess: associated with obstruction of an infectedkidney with abscess formation in the pernephric space due toextension of bacterial infection across the renal capsule

  • 8/8/2019 17-Laboratory Evaluation of Urinary Tr Act Infection v1- 3

    6/33

    Pathophysiology of urinary tract

    infection Uncomplicated urinary tract infection:

    Bacterial or yeast infection in a

    structurally and neurologically normalurinary tract

    Complicated urinary tract infection:

    Bacterial or yeast infection in a urinary

    tract with functional or structuralabnormalities

  • 8/8/2019 17-Laboratory Evaluation of Urinary Tr Act Infection v1- 3

    7/33

    Risk factors in complicated

    urinary tract infection Indwelling catheters

    Urinary calculi

    Neurogenic bladder Prostatic enlargement

    Uterine prolapse

    Urologic instrumentation or surgery

    Renal transplantation

    Diabetes mellitus

  • 8/8/2019 17-Laboratory Evaluation of Urinary Tr Act Infection v1- 3

    8/33

    Bacterial virulence factors in

    urinary tract infection Escherichia colistrains expressing O-antigens O1,

    O2, O4, O6, O7, O8, O75, O150, and O18ab causehigh proportion of infections

    Capsular K1, K5, and K12 antigens ofE. coli

    associated with clinical severity (antiphagocytic) P-fimbriae enhance mannose-resistant attachment ofE. colito globoseries glycosphingolipid receptors(gal-gal) of uroepithelial cells (P-fimbriated E. colidominant as cause of pyelonephritis and urosepsis)

    Type 1 fimbriae enhance mannose-susceptibleadherence ofE. colito uroepithelial cells (virtually allcystitis-producing E. colistrains express type 1fimbriae)

    Motile bacteria ascend the ureter against urine flow

  • 8/8/2019 17-Laboratory Evaluation of Urinary Tr Act Infection v1- 3

    9/33

    Bacterial virulence factors in

    urinary tract infection Bacterial urease (Proteus, Corynebacterium

    urealyticum) splits urinary urea with generation ofammonium ion that alkalinizes urine with loss of acidpH as natural defense barrier against infection, stoneformation with ureteral obstruction and survivial ofbacteria deep within stones resisting eradication byantibiotic, and alkaline-encrusted cystitis

    Gram-negative endotoxin decreases ureteralperistalsis

    Hemolysin produced by many uropathogens

    damages renal tubular epithelium and promotesinvasive infection

    Aerobactin (a siderophore) present at increasedfrequency in uropathogenic strains ofE. colipromoting intracellular iron accumulation for

    bacterial replication

  • 8/8/2019 17-Laboratory Evaluation of Urinary Tr Act Infection v1- 3

    10/33

    Host protective factors in urinary

    tract infection Flushing mechanism of micturition a major

    protective factor

    Low vaginal pH (3.5-4.5) (due to lactic acid producedby action ofLactobacillion glycogen of sloughed

    vaginal epithelial cells) suppresses colonization byuropathogens

    Normal acid pH of urine (4.6-6) anti-bacterial

    Urinary Tamm-Horsefall protein (secreted byascending loop of Henle) binds to mannose-sensitive fimbriae and blocks E. coliattachment touroepithelial cells

    Chemotactic interleukin-8 released upon bacterialattachment to uroepithelial cells with recruitment ofphagocytic neutrophils and eradication of bacteriuria

  • 8/8/2019 17-Laboratory Evaluation of Urinary Tr Act Infection v1- 3

    11/33

    Immune responses in urinary

    tract infection Large numbers of submucosal IgA-

    producing plasma cells in bacterial cystitis

    IgM and/or IgG antibodies produced against

    O-antigen, K antigen, type 1 and P fimbriae,and lipid A

    Protective role of antibodies unclear, may

    limit damage within the kidney and preventpersistent colonization and thus recurrence

    of infection

  • 8/8/2019 17-Laboratory Evaluation of Urinary Tr Act Infection v1- 3

    12/33

    Pathophysiology of urinary tract

    infection Hematogenous seeding of renal cortex less

    frequent than ascending infection

    Kidney a common site of abscess formationin Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, lessoften in candidemia, rarely with gram-negative bacteremia

    Hematogenous seeding of kidney alsooccurs with Salmonella(typhoid) and

    Mycobacterium tuberculosis Evidence for a role of periureteral and renal

    lymphatics in urinary infection lacking

  • 8/8/2019 17-Laboratory Evaluation of Urinary Tr Act Infection v1- 3

    13/33

    Common Uropathogens

    Escherichia coli

    OtherEnterobacteriaceae (Klebsiella, Enterobacter,Proteus, Citrobacter)

    Pseudomonas aeruginosa

    Enterococcus

    Staphylococcus saprophyticus

    Staphylococcus aureus1

    Streptococcus agalactiae (group B)2

    Candida1Associated with staphylococcemia2Denotes vaginal colonization in pregnant women

  • 8/8/2019 17-Laboratory Evaluation of Urinary Tr Act Infection v1- 3

    14/33

    Uncommon Uropathogens

    Corynebacterium urealyticum1

    Haemophilus influenzae and H. parainfluenzae2

    Blastomyces dermatitidis3

    Neisseria gonorrhaeae4

    Mycobacterium tuberculosis51Colistin nalidixic acid (CNA) agar2Chocolate agar3Brain heart infusion, inhibitory mold, or Sabourad

    dextrose agar4Enhanced recovery with chocolate agar5Lowenstein-Jensen medium, Middlebrook broth or

    agar

  • 8/8/2019 17-Laboratory Evaluation of Urinary Tr Act Infection v1- 3

    15/33

    Commensal Microflora of the

    Urethra Coagulase-negative staphylococci

    (except S. saprophyticus)

    Viridans and non-hemolyticstreptococci

    Lactobacilli

    Diphtheroids (Corynebacteriumexcept

    C. urealyticum) Saprophytic Neisseria

    Anaerobic bacteria

  • 8/8/2019 17-Laboratory Evaluation of Urinary Tr Act Infection v1- 3

    16/33

    Common Risk Factors for

    Urinary Tract Infection: Women Urinary tract obstruction (including calculi)

    Catheterization (straight, indwelling)

    Pregnancy

    Urologic instrumentation or surgery

    Neurogenic bladder

    Renal transplantation

    Sexual intercourse Estrogen deficiency (loss of vaginal

    lactobacilli)

  • 8/8/2019 17-Laboratory Evaluation of Urinary Tr Act Infection v1- 3

    17/33

    Common Risk Factors for

    Urinary Tract Infection: Men Urinary tract obstruction (including calculi)

    Catheterization (straight, indwelling)

    Prostatic enlargement

    Urologic instrumentation or surgery

    Neurogenic bladder

    Renal transplantation

    Insertive rectal intercourse Lack of circumcision (children and young

    adults)

  • 8/8/2019 17-Laboratory Evaluation of Urinary Tr Act Infection v1- 3

    18/33

    Signs and Symptoms of Lower

    Urinary Tract Infection Inflammatory irritation of urethral and

    bladder mucosa

    Frequent and painful urination of smallvolumes of turbid urine

    Occasional suprapubic pain or

    sensation of heaviness

    Fever generally absent

  • 8/8/2019 17-Laboratory Evaluation of Urinary Tr Act Infection v1- 3

    19/33

    Signs and Symptoms of Upper

    Urinary Tract Infection Fever and chills (systemic reaction)

    Flank pain

    Lower urinary tract signs andsymptoms (frequency, urgency, and

    dysuria)

  • 8/8/2019 17-Laboratory Evaluation of Urinary Tr Act Infection v1- 3

    20/33

    Asymptomatic Bacteriuria

    Presence of uropathogens by culture without

    signs or symptoms of urinary tract infection

    Clinically significant (should be treated) with

    preschool children (? vesicoureteral reflux,congenital urinary tract anomaly), pregnant

    women, and adults with obstructive uropathy

    Without clinical significance (should not be

    treated) for adults in absence of urinary tract

    obstruction

  • 8/8/2019 17-Laboratory Evaluation of Urinary Tr Act Infection v1- 3

    21/33

    Urinary Tract Specimens

    First-voided morning urine optimal (generallybacteria have been proliferating in bladder urine forseveral hours)

    Midstream urine specimens (initially voided urine

    contains urethral commensals) Indwelling catheters (freshly placed, urine aspirated

    by needle inserted into catheter) (Foley catheter tipsnot acceptable)

    Straight catheter specimens

    Suprapubic aspirates (infants or children, recoveryof anaerobes)1

    Cystoscopic collection of urine1Contamination-free specimen

  • 8/8/2019 17-Laboratory Evaluation of Urinary Tr Act Infection v1- 3

    22/33

    Collection of Urine Specimens

    Urine collected in sterile specimen

    container must be processed within 2

    hours, or refrigerated and processed

    within 24 hours

    Urine collected in sterile specimen

    container with borate preservative

    should be processed within 24 hours(no refrigeration required)

  • 8/8/2019 17-Laboratory Evaluation of Urinary Tr Act Infection v1- 3

    23/33

    Inoculation of Urine

    Inoculation of urine for quantitative culture (colonyforming unitscfus) performed with a calibrated0.001 mL and 0.01 mL plastic or wire loop

    Sheep blood agar (SBA) utilized for quantitative

    urine culture With 0.001 ml loop, 1 colony on SBA equivalent to

    1,000 cfus per mL of urine

    With 0.01 ml loop, 1 colony on SBA equivalent to 100cfus per mL of urine

    MacConkey agar utilized as selective differentialagar for gram-negative bacteria, colistin nalidixicacid agar as selective agar for gram-positivebacteria, and chocolate agar for fastidious gram-negative bacteria (Haemophilus)

  • 8/8/2019 17-Laboratory Evaluation of Urinary Tr Act Infection v1- 3

    24/33

    Interpretation of Urine Cultures:

    General Guidelines A single species ofEnterobacteriaceae recovered at

    >105 cfus/mL urine: with patients symptomatic forurinary tract infection, 95% probability of truebacteriuria

    A single species ofE

    nteroba

    cteriaceae recovered at104-105 cfus/mL urine: with patients symptomatic for

    urinary tract infection, 33% probability of truebacteriuira

    Gram-positive, fungal, and fastidious uropathogensoften present in lower numbers (104-105 cfus/mL

    urine) Urethral commensals recovered at

  • 8/8/2019 17-Laboratory Evaluation of Urinary Tr Act Infection v1- 3

    25/33

    Cumitech Guidelines for

    Inoculation of Urine Cultures1

    Routine: uncomplicated urinary tract infection inambulatory outpatients (0.001 mL loop, SBA, MAC;24 hr incubation)

    Surveillance: neurogenic bladder, indwelling

    catheter, geriatric patents (0.001 mL loop, SBA,MAC, CNA; 24 hr incubation)

    Special: suprapubic aspirates or straight catheterspecimens where previous cultures negative,unresponsive to therapy, or possibility of unusualurinary tract pathogen (0.001 and 0.01 mL loop, BA,

    MAC, CHOC; minimum 48 hr incubation)1Clarridge, Johnson, Pezzlo, and Weissfeld, ASM

    Cumitech 2B, November 1998.

  • 8/8/2019 17-Laboratory Evaluation of Urinary Tr Act Infection v1- 3

    26/33

    Cumitech Guidelines for

    Interpretation of Routine Urine

    Cultures1

    One isolate at >104: Full ID and Susceptibility

    One or two gram-negative isolates at >105

    and other isolates at least 10X less: Full IDand Susceptibility of gram-negative isolates

    Other patterns of isolates at >104:Presumptive ID only

    Ignore mixed urethral flora at

  • 8/8/2019 17-Laboratory Evaluation of Urinary Tr Act Infection v1- 3

    27/33

    Cumitech Guidelines for

    Interpretation of Surveillance

    Urine Cultures1

    One isolate at >104: Full ID and Susceptibility

    One gram-negative isolate at >105 with others

    at least 10X less: Full ID and Susceptibility Other patterns of isolates at >104:

    Presumptive ID only

    Ignore mixed urethral flora at

  • 8/8/2019 17-Laboratory Evaluation of Urinary Tr Act Infection v1- 3

    28/33

    Cumitech Guidelines for

    Interpretation of Special Urine

    Cultures1

    One or two isolates at >102 to 105: Full

    ID and Susceptibility

    1Clarridge, Johnson, Pezzlo, and

    Weissfeld, Cumitech 2B, November1998

  • 8/8/2019 17-Laboratory Evaluation of Urinary Tr Act Infection v1- 3

    29/33

    ASM Manual Guidelines for Urine

    Culture Results Likely to Be

    Significant1 Midstream, female with cystitis, >102 with positive urine

    leukocyte esterase

    Midstream, female with pyelonephritis, >105 with positive urineleukocyte esterase

    Midstream, asymptomatic, >105 with negative urine leukocyteesterase (usually)

    Midstream, male with UTI: >103 with leukocyte with urineleukocyte esterase positive

    Straight catheter: >102 with urine leukocyte esterase positive

    Indwelling catheter: >103 with urine leukocyte esterase positiveor negative

    1Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 8th Edition, ASM, 2003

  • 8/8/2019 17-Laboratory Evaluation of Urinary Tr Act Infection v1- 3

    30/33

    NMH Guidelines for

    Interpretation of Urine Cultures1

    Urine leukocyte esterase positive

    One or two organisms at >103: FullID and Susceptibility

    One organism at >104

    with others (2 ormore) at least 10X less: Full ID andsusceptibility of predominantorganism

    Report all group B -hemolytic

    streptococci for women < 50 years1Modified from ASM Cumitech, ASM Manual,

    and CDC MMWR 2002;51 (RR-11):1-22

  • 8/8/2019 17-Laboratory Evaluation of Urinary Tr Act Infection v1- 3

    31/33

    NMH Guidelines for

    Interpretation of Urine Cultures1

    Urine leukocyte esterase negative

    One or two organisms at >105: Fulland Susceptibility

    One gram-negative organism (pure culture) at

    >10

    4

    : Full ID and SusceptibilityYeast in pure culture: ID as Candida

    albicans or not C.albicans

    Report all group B -hemolytic streptococci forwomen

  • 8/8/2019 17-Laboratory Evaluation of Urinary Tr Act Infection v1- 3

    32/33

    Quality Monitor for Urine

    Cultures

    104/mL

  • 8/8/2019 17-Laboratory Evaluation of Urinary Tr Act Infection v1- 3

    33/33

    References

    Sobel and Kaye. Urinary Tract Infections. InMandell, Douglas, and Bennetts Principles andPractice of Infectious Diseases, 6th edition, Elsevier,2005, pp. 975-905.

    Clarride, Johnson, Pezzlo, and Weissfeld.Laboratory Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infections.Cumitech 2B, ASM Press, 1998, pp. 2-19.

    Thomson, Jr. and Miller. Specimen Collection,Transport, and Processing: Bacteriology. In Manualof Clinical Microbiology, 8th edition, ASM Press,

    2003, pp. 286-330. Chapter 60. Infections of the Urinary Tract. In Bailey

    & Scotts Diagnostic Microbiology, 11th edition,Mosby, pp. 927-938,