1990 cooke - classification of audiometric results

2
J. Soc. Occup. Med. (1990) 40, 117 Letter to the Editor Classification of Audiometric Results Sir, A number of classification systems have been proposed for assessment of hearing loss from audiograms, which is of particular importance in the context of assessment of disability, for example as a result of occupational noise exposure. Among the systems currently used are that proposed by the British Association of Otolaryngologists 1 , which expresses hearing loss as a percentage disability, and the simple numerical system put forward in the Health and Safety Executive Discussion Document Audiometry in Industry 1 . This document never progressed beyond the discussion stage, although the classification system has been widely discussed in occupational health circles since it was published. It classifies audiograms into five groups as below, the low frequencies being 0.5, 1 and 2 kHz, and the high frequencies being 3, 4 and 6 kHz. Category I. The first category applies if the sum of the hearing levels for either high or low frequencies shows an increase of 30 dB or more when compared with the immediately preceding audiogram, or 45 dB when the interval since the preceding examination exceeds 3 years. Category 2. This applies when the difference of the sums of hearing levels between the two ears exceeds 45 dB for the low frequencies or 60 dB for the high frequencies. Category 3. The third category is the 'warning level'. Category 4. This is the 'referral level'. Each of these categories is calculated from a table of hearing levels for different age ranges, thereby taking into account the effects of presbyacusis. Category 5. This applies to the rest, i.e. normal audio- grams. However, the use of a single numerical classification system does not allow for situations where the result might fall into more than one category, as for example the individual showing a unilateral 'referral level' hearing loss, which has progressed since the last audiogram. It is suggested that three sets of parameters need to be recorded, i.e. whether or not (a) a previous audiogram has been performed, and, if so, whether there has been any change in the successive audiogram; (b) there is any significant difference in the hearing thresholds of the two ears; (c) there is any significant hearing loss, i.e. category 3 or 4 in the proposed HSE classification. Use of the following three digit system enables simple classification of audiometric results, using the same criteria as in the HSE Discussion Document, without the loss of information associated with the use of a single digit system. First Digit 0 No change from previous audiogram, using HSE criteria 1 Significant change from previous audiogram, using HSE criteria 6 No previous audiogram Second Digit 0 No difference between the two ears, using the HSE criteria 2 Significant difference between the two ears, using HSE criteria Third Digit 3 HSE 'Referral level' 4 HSE 'Warning level' 5 No significant loss Hence, for example, an individual who has no previous audiogram, and shows no significant hearing deficit will be coded as 605. An individual with a previous audio- gram, significantly changed, with a different threshold in each ear, and falling into the referral category will be coded 123. The system is presented as a simple extension of the HSE proposal, and our experience has shown that computerized audiometry systems can be programmed to undertake the classification without difficulty. It has the advantage of being simpler than most other systems currently in use, without the loss of information that is inevitable with a single digit system. R. A. COOKE Chief Medical Officer, GKN pic, Redditch, Worcestershire, UK REFERENCES 1. Method for Assessment of Hearing Disability. Br Assoc Otolaryngol and Br Soc Audiology, 1983. 1 Health & Safety Executive Discussion Document, Awllometry in Industry, 1978. 'i~, 1990 Butterworth-Heinemunn for SOM 0301-0023/90/0301 17-01

Upload: marcela-cortes

Post on 27-Apr-2015

31 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1990 Cooke - Classification of Audiometric Results

J. Soc. Occup. Med. (1990) 40, 117

Letter to the Editor

Classification of Audiometric Results

Sir,

A number of classification systems have been proposedfor assessment of hearing loss from audiograms, whichis of particular importance in the context of assessmentof disability, for example as a result of occupational noiseexposure. Among the systems currently used are thatproposed by the British Association of Otolaryngologists1,which expresses hearing loss as a percentage disability,and the simple numerical system put forward in theHealth and Safety Executive Discussion DocumentAudiometry in Industry1. This document never progressedbeyond the discussion stage, although the classificationsystem has been widely discussed in occupational healthcircles since it was published. It classifies audiograms intofive groups as below, the low frequencies being 0.5, 1 and2 kHz, and the high frequencies being 3, 4 and 6 kHz.

Category I. The first category applies if the sum of thehearing levels for either high or low frequencies showsan increase of 30 dB or more when compared with theimmediately preceding audiogram, or 45 dB when theinterval since the preceding examination exceeds 3 years.

Category 2. This applies when the difference of the sumsof hearing levels between the two ears exceeds 45 dB forthe low frequencies or 60 dB for the high frequencies.

Category 3. The third category is the 'warning level'.

Category 4. This is the 'referral level'.

Each of these categories is calculated from a table ofhearing levels for different age ranges, thereby taking intoaccount the effects of presbyacusis.

Category 5. This applies to the rest, i.e. normal audio-grams.

However, the use of a single numerical classificationsystem does not allow for situations where the resultmight fall into more than one category, as for examplethe individual showing a unilateral 'referral level' hearingloss, which has progressed since the last audiogram. Itis suggested that three sets of parameters need to berecorded, i.e. whether or not

(a) a previous audiogram has been performed, and, ifso, whether there has been any change in the successiveaudiogram;

(b) there is any significant difference in the hearingthresholds of the two ears;

(c) there is any significant hearing loss, i.e. category 3or 4 in the proposed HSE classification.

Use of the following three digit system enables simpleclassification of audiometric results, using the samecriteria as in the HSE Discussion Document, without theloss of information associated with the use of a singledigit system.

First Digit0 No change from previous audiogram, using HSE

criteria1 Significant change from previous audiogram, using

HSE criteria6 No previous audiogram

Second Digit0 No difference between the two ears, using the HSE

criteria2 Significant difference between the two ears, using HSE

criteria

Third Digit3 HSE 'Referral level'4 HSE 'Warning level'5 No significant loss

Hence, for example, an individual who has no previousaudiogram, and shows no significant hearing deficit willbe coded as 605. An individual with a previous audio-gram, significantly changed, with a different threshold ineach ear, and falling into the referral category will becoded 123. The system is presented as a simple extensionof the HSE proposal, and our experience has shown thatcomputerized audiometry systems can be programmedto undertake the classification without difficulty. It hasthe advantage of being simpler than most other systemscurrently in use, without the loss of information that isinevitable with a single digit system.

R. A. COOKEChief Medical Officer,GKN pic,Redditch,Worcestershire, UK

REFERENCES1. Method for Assessment of Hearing Disability. Br Assoc Otolaryngol

and Br Soc Audiology, 1983.1 Health & Safety Executive Discussion Document, Awllometry in

Industry, 1978.

'i~, 1990 Butterworth-Heinemunn for SOM0301-0023/90/0301 17-01

Page 2: 1990 Cooke - Classification of Audiometric Results

The British Occupational Hygiene Society

Seventh International Symposiumon Inhaled Particles

Edinburgh, 16-20 September

The Seventh International Symposium on Inhaled Particles will be held at the new Edinburgh ConferenceCentre on the Heriot Watt University Campus in Edinburgh. The Proceedings of the Symposium will againbe refereed, edited and published.

The Symposium will be concerned primarily with advances in understanding the basic mechanisms ofdeposition and clearance of dusts, their biological reactions and epidemiological studies. Topics will include:

Factors affecting the measurement of inhaled fraction;New models of deposition;Biological reactions of dusts in the lung;Synergistic effects of gases and dusts;Exposure - response studies of fibres, silica and other dusts;The role of different minerals in mixed dust pneumoconiosis;Dust or chemical exposure in relation to occupational asthma; andEffects of radon exposure and indoor air quality.

For further information please contact: Dr A. Robertson, Organising Secretary, Institute of Occupational Medicine, RoxburghPlace, Edinburgh, EH8 9SU, UK.

Occupational Health PracticeThird Edition

E d i t e d b y H . A . W a l d r o n PhD MD MRCP FFOM, Consultant Occupational Physician, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK

+ A leading team of contributors for the third edition• Reflects the many changes that have taken place since the last edition

•k Fully revised, updated and well-illustrated

Occupational Health Practice - Third Edition has been virtually re-written to take into account the many changes since the last editionand has been completely restructured. Although there are others in the field, this book is aimed specifically at occupational healthprofessionals and not those in other specialties and covers all aspects of occupational health practice from pre-employmcnt screening, todetecting adverse effects in those at work and any harmful effects in the working environment. In addition the comprehensive coverage

includes individuals, working populations, and the workplace itself.

March 1989 544 pages 234 x 165 mm Hardcover lltustrated-23 half tones and 91 line drawings 0 407 33702 4 £35.00

ORDER THIS COMPLETE GUIDE TO PRACTICE NOW!

Order from your bookseller or return Ihc coupon to: Felicity Davie, Butlerworths, PO Box 63. Wcstbury House. Bury Street, Guildford,Surrey GU2 5BH, UK

• Please send me copy(s) of Occ«pallon«l He»lth Practice 3/e 0 407 33702 4 @ £35.00

• I enclose remittance for £ Cheques made payable to Butterwonh & Co (Publishers) Ltd

Q P l e a s e d e b i t m y c r e d i t c a r d : A c c e s i / B a r d a y c a r d / V i s a / A m e r i c a n E x p r e s s C a r d n u m b e r I B a H I I I I H I l t l l i n l l H a B l

Expiry Dale Signature

Name Address

. Pos tcode .Ftcuc allow 28 day! for delivery in the UK Rc|iucrcd office. 88 Kinpwiy, London WC2B 6AB Registered in En|land No. 115354

Butterworths