1m ounce mt bundy gold project

28
Investor Presentation September 2013 MT BUNDY GOLD PROJECT NORTHERN TERRITORY Recommence Mining and Processing Operations Toms Gully ASX Code: PGO and PGOO For personal use only

Upload: others

Post on 22-Dec-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1M ounce Mt Bundy Gold Project

Investor Presentation

September 2013

MT BUNDY GOLD PROJECT

NORTHERN TERRITORY

Recommence Mining and Processing Operations

Toms Gully

ASX Code: PGO and PGOO

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

Page 2: 1M ounce Mt Bundy Gold Project

Statements and material contained in this Presentation, particularly those regarding possible or assumed future performance, production

levels or rates, resources or potential growth of Primary Gold Limited (PGO), industry growth or other trend projections are, or may be,

forward looking statements. Such statements relate to future events and expectations and, as such, involve known and unknown risks and

uncertainties. Although PGO believes that the expectations contained in any forward looking statements in this presentation are, as at the

date of this presentation, made on a reasonable basis, such statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results and the

timing of such results may differ materially from those herein described. Factors which may impact on future performance and cause actual

results to differ materially from those contained in forward looking statements include, without limitation, changes in commodity prices,

exchange rates, PGO’s access to capital and general and market conditions.

This presentation may describe Measured, Indicated and/or Inferred Resources. Inferred Resources have a greater amount of uncertainty as

to their existence and greater uncertainty as to their economic feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of any Inferred Resource

will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Exploration is an inherently risky proposition and investors are advised that most exploration

projects fail to identify economic resources. The Company has at present not confirmed the economic viability of any resources at the project.

The company plans further drilling programs and studies with the objective of confirmation of any deposits and ultimately completing a

feasibility study to demonstrate the economics of the resources.

The information contained in this presentation is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer to issue, or arrange to issue,

securities or other financial products. The information contained in this presentation is not investment or financial product advice and is not

intended to be used as the basis for making an investment decision. The presentation has been prepared without taking into account the

investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any particular person.

No representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to the fairness, accuracy, completeness or correctness of the information,

opinions and conclusions contained in this presentation. To the maximum extent permitted by law, none of PGO, their directors, employees or

agents, nor any other person accepts any liability, including, without limitation, any liability arising out of fault of negligence, for any loss

arising from the use of the information contained in this presentation. In particular, no representation or warranty, express or implied is given

as to the accuracy, completeness or correctness, likelihood of achievement or reasonableness or any forecasts, prospects or returns

contained in this presentation nor is any obligation assumed to update such information. Such forecasts, prospects or returns are by their

nature subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies.

Before making an investment decision, you should consider, with or without the assistance of a financial adviser, whether an investment is

appropriate in light of your particular investment needs, objectives and financial circumstances.

Disclaimer and Important Information

2

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

Page 3: 1M ounce Mt Bundy Gold Project

Gold focus in Northern Territory, Australia

Listed March 2013

‒ Acquired Mt Bundy Gold Project, including Toms Gully & Rustlers

Roost

‒ 2,900 km2 under-explored tenure, advanced projects

Current resources 1.2m ounces, reserves 175k oz

Toms Gully - Targeting first production 2014

‒ Maiden Ore Reserve 175k oz Au (refer to ASX announcement 27

August 2013)

‒ Feasibility Study completed - low capital, low op & total costs, rapid

start-up, fast payback

‒ Current reserve supports 3 year plan targeting 65,000 p.a. at C3 costs

of A$903/oz (less once-off start-up capital)

Growth potential

‒ Toms Gully remains open, Feasibility includes $3m for extension

drilling

‒ Rustlers Roost - JORC Resource 875k oz Au (refer to ASX

announcement 3 July 2013)

‒ Significant greenfields exploration potential

Strong and experienced Board, established gold credentials

Attractive valuation metrics:

‒ $11 EV/Measured + Indicated oz compared to peer avg. of $32/oz

‒ $52 EV/Reserve oz compared to $382/oz (avg.) for Producers

Introducing Primary Gold

3

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

Page 4: 1M ounce Mt Bundy Gold Project

Corporate Overview

4

ASX Codes PGO, PGOO

Ordinary shares 72 million

Options (listed & unlisted) 42 million

Market cap (undiluted) at

$0.13/sh≈ $9.4 million

Cash (end of June Qtr) ≈ $1.7 million

Average daily volume ≈ 17K

Directors and Senior Management

Dale Rogers Non-Exec Chairman

Clay Gordon Managing Director

Tim Manners Non-Exec Director

Mike Hendriks Non-Exec Director

Philip Gray Non-Exec Director

Simon Durack Company Secretary

Shareholder Structure

Directors 19%

Crocodile Gold 16%

Number of shareholders 763

Top 20 shareholders 64%

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

Mar-13 Apr-13 May-13 Jun-13 Jul-13 Aug-13 Sep-13

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

Price ($)Share Price Performance and VolumeVolume ('000)

$0.18

$0.07

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

Page 5: 1M ounce Mt Bundy Gold Project

Dale Rogers

Non Executive

Chairman

Dale has a Bachelor of Engineering (Mining) and over 25 years’ experience in the mining industry, commencing in Kalgoorlie and Kambalda in

the 1980’s where he managed several underground mines for WMC before moving to the new project development of WMC’s Mt Keith

Operations during the pre-strip and the first year of ore production in the mid-1990’s. At the time, this was the largest contractor earthmoving

operation by volume in the Southern Hemisphere. He has developed and managed operations in Australia and overseas, including taking

Albidon Limited as Managing Director from a junior explorer with a market capitalisation of $40m in 2005 to a market capitalisation of almost

$1 billion in 2008. Mr Rogers is currently non executive Chairman of Phoenix Gold Limited.

Clay Gordon

Managing

Director

Clay has a Bachelor of Applied Science (Geology) and a Master of Science (Mineral Economics) and has over 25 years’ experience in the

resources industry in senior operational and management positions with various mining companies in a range of commodities, including

precious and base metals and industrial minerals. Clay founded and operated Mining Assets Pty Ltd (between 2004 and 2012), which is a

private consultancy involved in the assessment and marketing of mineral projects and was a founding Director of Phoenix Gold, resigning in

May 2013 in order to concentrate on PGO. Clay is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and the Australian Institute

of Geoscientists.

Tim Manners

Non Executive

Director

Tim has over 20 years’ experience in senior finance roles within the Australian and International resources sector. He is a Fellow of the

Institute of Chartered Accountants of Australia and a qualified Company Secretary. Mr Manners has significant experience in the fields of

accounting, taxation, treasury and financial risk management in companies spanning all stages of corporate growth, from exploration activities,

project development through to producing companies. Having obtained his professional qualifications with Ernst & Young, Mr Manners has

focussed his career in the resources industry with exposure to both base and precious metals businesses and bulk commodities. Mr Manners

has held Chief Financial Officer roles at both Western Areas NL , Perilya Ltd and Bathurst Resources Ltd and is currently CFO gold explorer

and miner Phoenix Gold Limited.

Philip Gray

Non Executive

Director

Philip, a founding shareholder of Hydrotech, is an Investment Banker with over 35 years of international experience, with an emphasis on

Emerging Markets in Asia. In the course of his extensive career, he has been Chairman/Director of several listed operating entities on a

number of Exchanges, Chairman of several professional bodies, and has been involved with Australian Capital Markets for over 20 years, first

as Chairman of GT Management (Australia) and later on as Chairman of HSBC James Capel (Australia) Limited. He holds an MA in Marketing

and amongst his other qualifications; Philip is a Fellow of The Institute of Directors and a Member of The Society of Trust and Estate

Practitioners.

Mike Hendriks

Non Executive

Director

Mike is a Chartered Accountant and is a member of the Financial Services Institute of Australia and of the Australian Institute of Company

Directors. He started his career with Price WaterhouseCoopers in 1979. Since then he has gained extensive experience in the financial

services sector in various roles in the banking and stockbroking industries. From 1998 to 2007 he was the national sales and distribution

manager for ITC (now Elders Forestry). Mr Hendriks is on the advisory board of a private WA company, Chrystal and Co Pty Ltd and is a non

executive director of an unlisted UK company Carlton Resources Plc.

Experienced Team

5

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

Page 6: 1M ounce Mt Bundy Gold Project

Delivering on Key Promises

6

Since listing, the focus has been on advancing the high-grade Toms Gully mine towards production:

‒ Successfully grown Resources

‒ Delivered a maiden ore Reserve

‒ Completed a Feasibility Study with assistance from independent industry experts

‒ Announced a robust business plan for recommencement of gold mining and milling operations

ObjectiveAt listing,

March 2013

Current position,

August 2013Achievements (over past 6 months)

Mineral

Resources0.514mt at 8.4g/t 140,000 oz 1.065mt at 9.0g/t for 310,000 oz

122% increase in Resources as announced

to ASX 3 July 2013. Significant potential for

further growth.

Ore Reserves - 775kt at 6.9g/t for 175,000 oz

Underpinning first 3 years of operations plan

with good growth potential ($3m included in

feasibility for infill & extension drilling).

Feasibility

study-

5 year plan, targeting 65k oz p.a.,

at low costs (C1 = A$663,

C3=A$903)

Rapid start-up & payback, robust margins at

Au A$1,444 generating up to $40m p.a., total

A$121m EBITDA over 5 year plan.

Market Cap $14.4m (at $0.20/sh) $9.4m (at $0.13/sh) Recent recognition on back of Feasibility.

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

Page 7: 1M ounce Mt Bundy Gold Project

$0

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

$1,600

$1,800

$2,000

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Gold PriceAUD USD

Renison Consolidated

Mines Ltd

2005-Mar‘07GBS

July-Sept ‘08

Croc. Gold

March-August ’10

Incl. Plant upgrade

& $2.5m diamond

drilling

Mt Bundy – History

7

Toms Gully

open pit,

Rustlers

Roost pit &

heap leach

PGO

Delivers Toms

Gully Feasibility

August 2013

US$ Gold

Carpentaria, ‘88-91 Toms Gully Open pit, 105k oz at 9.3g/t $350-$450/Oz

RRMPL, ‘96-98 Rustlers Roost heap-leach 110k oz $300-$400/Oz

Renison, ‘99-03 Quest, heap-leach, ~ 10koz $300-$400/Oz

Renison, ‘07 Toms Gully UG, ~ 6koz < $700/Oz

GBS,’08 Toms Gully UG, ~ 4koz ~ $800/Oz

CRK, ‘10 Toms Gully UG < $1,100/Oz

Primary, August 2013 Toms Gully Feasibility announced ~ $1,400/Oz

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

Page 8: 1M ounce Mt Bundy Gold Project

Toms Gully – History

8

Company Issue Situation Solution

Carpentaria

Gold P/L

(1991)

Geotechnical

Following very successful open pit,

underground decline access

commenced but encountered difficult

ground associated with a known fault

zone on eastern side of orebody.

Decline has since been rehabilitated

by subsequent operators & is now

useable. Second decline access

established within areas of good

ground conditions, avoiding the fault

zones.

Rension Cons.

Mines Ltd

(2007)

Flooding

Flood prevention strategy based on

max. monthly rainfall average,

however, mine received monthly quota

in 24 hours. Pumping capacity too

small, mine floods and is eventually

sold.

Primary’s strategy based on max. 24

hour average, consequently pumping

capacity is 10 times that of Renison.

GBS &

Crocodile

Gold,

(‘08-10)

Poor ore

grades

Decline was heading to higher grade

ore, but majority of mining situated in

lower grade zone. Mining method

resulted in excessive dilution (≈

200%). Both contribute to lower than

planned grades.

Primary to specifically target higher

grade zones. Also use different mining

method to control dilution (split-face

firing of ore & waste separately).

Several episodes of underground mining, various technical challenges

Solutions built into PGO Feasibility Study

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

Page 9: 1M ounce Mt Bundy Gold Project

Toms Gully (310k oz) estimated & reported by Cube Consulting in accordance with the 2012 Edition of JORC Code.

‒ Estimation vetted by second independent geology/resource consultant, Quatitative Group.

Rustlers Roost (80% PGO) reported by Cube Consulting in accordance with the 2004 Edition of JORC Code.

Targeting review of Rustlers Roost & introduction of Quest resource.

Maiden ore reserve estimated and reported by independent consultants, Golder Associates in accordance with the

2012 Edition of JORC Code.

Primary Gold - Resources &

Reserves

9

Tonnes Grade Au Tonnes Grade Au Tonnes Grade Au

(kt) (g/t) (kOz) (kt) (g/t) (kOz) (kt) (g/t) (kOz)

815 9.1 240 250 8.7 70 1,065 9.0 310

Tonnes Grade Au Tonnes Grade Au Tonnes Grade Au

(kt) (g/t) (kOz) (kt) (g/t) (kOz) (kt) (g/t) (kOz)

19,920 0.9 573 10,320 0.9 302 30,240 0.9 875

Tonnes Grade Au Tonnes Grade Au Tonnes Grade Au

(kt) (g/t) (kOz) (kt) (g/t) (kOz) (kt) (g/t) (kOz)

775 6.9 175 775 6.9 175

Mineral

Resources

Ore

Reserves

Toms Gully

(PGO 100%)

Proved Probable Total

Rustlers

Roost

(PGO 80%)

Indicated Inferred Total

Toms Gully

(PGO 100%)

Indicated Inferred Total

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

Page 10: 1M ounce Mt Bundy Gold Project

Toms Gully Gold Mine & Mill

10

100% owned Toms Gully within Mt Bundy Gold Project

Located 100km from Darwin, capital city of NT

Low operational & political risk

Access via sealed highway

22kv to mine & mill

Granted mining lease

High-grade production history

115k oz at 8.2 g/t (’88-’08)

High-grade resource

310k oz at 9.0 g/t

Significant infrastructure:

‒ 250k tpa processing plant (recently refurbished)

‒ Open pit with 2 declines accessing underground

orebody

‒ Decline developed 1km down length of underground

orebody

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

Page 11: 1M ounce Mt Bundy Gold Project

Dip extensive, shallow dipping, high-grade quartz + sulphide vein

Gold grades 3 to 30g/t

Mineralisation up to 4m thick

Mining guided by grade

Drilled 1.5km down dip

Toms Gully - ResourceF

or p

erso

nal u

se o

nly

Page 12: 1M ounce Mt Bundy Gold Project

12

Tonnes Range (kt) 300 350 750 1,000

Grade Range (g/t) 8.0 9.0 8.0 9.0

Ounces Range (kOz Au) 75 100 200 300

Target 1 Target 2

Resource &

Reserve Area

Proposed holes

(Target 1)

TGD321

TGD327

TGDDH006

TGDDH007

TGDDH027

Note: ranges are

approximations only

Proposed holes

(Target 2)

Toms Gully - Resource Growth

Two priority targets:

‒ Target 1 Extending the resource down dip -

potential for 100k ounces per 200m extension

‒ Target 2 Repeat structure - potential for up to 300k

ounces in repeat structure

A$3m included in Feasibility budget

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

Page 13: 1M ounce Mt Bundy Gold Project

Exploration Target – Cautionary

Statements

13

All references to Exploration Targets are made with the following clarifications & disclosures in accordance with JORC 2012 clauses 17,

18, 19:

• Potential quantities and grades are conceptual in nature, that there has been insufficient exploration to estimate a Mineral Resource

and that it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the estimation of a Mineral Resource.

• Targets are based on proposed exploration drilling programmes.

• The Company intends to commence these proposed drilling programmes within 2 years.

• Exploration activity will aim to test the validity of geological models.

• Exploration Targets based on a geological model which incorporates:

• Style of mineralisation similar to existing Resource, i.e. structurally controlled, quartz vein hosted, gold deposit.

• Approximations of tonnes and grade assumes grades, dimensions and orientation similar to those estimated for Toms Gully

Resource.

• Existing exploration data which indicates the potential for repetitions and extensions to the Resource.

• Minimal Exploration drilling activities completed to date :

• Target 1 located down dip of current Resource – only 2 drill holes, one of which intersected anomalous gold mineralisation, the

other drilled outside the target zone (see slide 10 for drill details),

• Target 2 located in footwall of current Resource – only 3 drill holes, one intersected anomalous gold mineralisation, one not

deep enough, one not sampled (see slide 10 for drill details).

• See slide 17 for Competent Persons Statement .

HoleNumber

Drill Type Northing Easting RL dip azimuth depth from to intersection comment

Target 1 TGD321 diamond 3577.5 14168.8 1042.2 -90 360 316.0m 285.15m 285.8m 0.65m @ 3.7g/t

TGD327 diamond 3134.7 14005.9 1068.6 -90 360 340.1m N/A outside target zone

Target 2 TGDDH006 diamond 4051.1 14550.0 1054.9 -85 360 840.0m 605.2m 607.0m 1.8m at 4.4g/t incl. 0.35 @ 14.2g/t

TGDDH007 diamond 4050.0 14399.0 1039.8 -85 358 568.2m N/A not drilled to target zone

TGDDH027 diamond 4246.9 14550.9 1045.0 -85 358 750.0m N/A target zone not sampled

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

Page 14: 1M ounce Mt Bundy Gold Project

14

Toms Gully Feasibility Study

Aim: assess viability of recommencing

mining and gold processing at Toms Gully

Managed by PGO executives (geologist &

engineer), with major works completed by

independent expert consultants:

‒ Cube Consulting - resource estimate

‒ Quantitative Group - reviewed

resource

‒ Golder Associates - ore reserve

estimate

‒ Independent Metallurgical Operations

- testwork, processing flow sheet,

capital & operating cost estimates

‒ Como Engineering - mill

refurbishment plan and capital cost

estimates

Feasibility Study outcomes and business

plan announced to ASX 27 August 2013.

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

Page 15: 1M ounce Mt Bundy Gold Project

15

Targeting 350,000 t at 6.9g/t & 65,000 recovered

ounces gold per annum

22 months to steady-state including start-up

A$19m working capital (incl. $2m contingency)

5 year plan, with first 3 years in ore reserve

C1 Costs: A$663/oz

C3 Costs: A$1,020/oz

C3 less once-off capital costs: A$903/oz

Generating A$121 million EBITDA (at spot

A$1,444/oz)

Cashflow positive – 10 months

Payback of start-up capital - 24 months

Feasibility Study – Outcomes

Note: Primary confirms that all the material

assumptions underpinning the production

target and/or forecast financial information

derived from a production target, in the

initial public report of 27 August 2013

continue to apply and have not materially

changed.

The potential quantity and grade of an

exploration target is conceptual in nature,

there has been insufficient exploration to

determine a mineral resource and there is

no certainty that further exploration work

will result in the determination of mineral

resources or that the production target itself

will be realised.

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

Page 16: 1M ounce Mt Bundy Gold Project

16

Feasibility Study – Working Capital

Start-up Working Capital (AUD)

General $1.5

Electrical $1

Fixed plant $1

Contingency $2

Mill refurb & upgrade $5

Dewatering/mine refurb $6

Mine development to 1st ore $2.5

Total $19m

250ktpa processing plant included in Mt Bundy acquisition

Replacement cost ≈A$20m

Original strategy (on listing) contemplated toll treatment &

mill refurbishment to be paid out of cashflow

Current strategy includes upgrade to 350ktpa for 65koz p.a

A$19m start-up working capital, including $2m contingency

‒ Dewatering & refurbishment of mine

‒ Mill upgrade (complete installation of tower mill,

install gravity circuit, intense leach reactor,

improvements

to floatation)

Mine & mill refurbishment and Stage 1 mill upgrade

completed

concurrently - months 1 to 8

Stage 2 mill upgrade to 350ktpa (≈A$4m)

‒ paid out of cashflow

‒ Months 17 to 20

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

Page 17: 1M ounce Mt Bundy Gold Project

17

Utilises existing mine & mill infrastructure

Room & pillar, 85% recovery

Minimum ore criteria - 1.2m wide and + 6.5g/t

Dilution - 0.6m at 0.0g/t Au (approx. 45%)

2 x twin boom jumbos

Split-face (resue) firing

Ramping-up to 350ktpa over 18 month period

Ore Reserve 775kt, 5yr Feasibility total 1.4Mt

Feasibility Study – Mine PhysicalsF

or p

erso

nal u

se o

nly

Page 18: 1M ounce Mt Bundy Gold Project

Current capacity 250ktpa

Pre-production refurbishment &

Stage 1 Upgrade (months 1-8)

‒ complete installation of tower

mill, add gravity & intense leach

reactor (acacia)

‒ Increase recoveries from 85%

to 88.6%

Stage 2 Up-grade 350kt & 65k oz

pa

‒ Completed months 17-20

‒ Increase capacity at primary

mill, floatation & leaching

‒ Recoveries increase to 89.6%

Steady state production - month 24

Targeting 277k oz total over initial 5

year life

18

Feasibility Study – Mill PhysicalsF

or p

erso

nal u

se o

nly

Page 19: 1M ounce Mt Bundy Gold Project

19

Feasibility Study - Financials

$/t $/oz

Mining 69.9 353

Processing 47.4 239

Maintenance 2.9 15

Admin 11.2 56

C1 131.4 663

Croc Gold Royalty1 1.8 9

Croc Gold Qrtly Payments2 1.1 7

NT Government Royalty3 11.2 55

C2 14.1 71

Sustaining Capital 8.9 45

Capital development - mine 24.5 124

C3 33.3 168

C3 Total Cash Costs $185/t $903/oz

Financials (AUD) Ore ReserveFeasibility

Study

Start-up working capital A$19m A$19m

C1 A$673/oz A$663/oz

C2 A$731/oz A$734/oz

C3 A$1,105/oz A$1,020/oz

C3 (less once-off start-up

costs)A$913/oz A$903/oz

Gold price US$1,300 US$1,300

AUD-USD exchange 0.90 0.90

Revenue A$222m A$401m

EBITDA A$52m A$121m

Note 1: Croc Gold Royalty $10/oz capped at $2.5m

Note 2: Croc Gold Qtrly payments – 4 equal payments capped at

$1.55m

Note 3: NT Government Royalty “profit” based, therefore moves with

gold price

NT royalty “Profit” based, after:

‒ carried-forward losses,

‒ Mining studies/evaluations

‒ Capital deductions

‒ Allowance for corporate costs

‒ paid 6 monthly

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

Page 20: 1M ounce Mt Bundy Gold Project

20

Feasibility Study - Financials

Cashflow positive 10 months

Payback 24 months

Initial 5 year mine life

A$121m EBITDA

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

Page 21: 1M ounce Mt Bundy Gold Project

Toms Gully - Next 12 Months

21

Mine Refurb & Stage 1 Mill upgrade

Commence production

Stage 2 Mill Upgrade

Steady state production

Cash flow positive

Payback

Toms Gully Exploration

20192013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Transition to “miner” status

Regain access to mine – 1st ore production, mid 2014

Re-commission mill – 1st gold production, mid 2014

Cashflow positive – Q3, 2014

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

Page 22: 1M ounce Mt Bundy Gold Project

Large-scale mineralised system of close-spaced, strataform, quartz-sulphide veins.

Current Resource 30Mt at 0.9g/t for 875k Ounces. (Primary 80%).

2012 Scoping Study supports the potential for large-scale, low strip, open cut, mining operation likely production

costs below $A1,100 per ounce.

Potential to increase inventories by upgrading the Inferred material to Indicated / Measured and extending

mineralisation at depth.

Results warrant further studies. Critical path - metallurgical testwork to ascertain effectiveness of heap leach and

select optimal process flowsheet and recovery.

22

Rustlers Roost DepositF

or p

erso

nal u

se o

nly

Page 23: 1M ounce Mt Bundy Gold Project

Very large system.

Remains open at depth and along strike.

Shallow drill intercepts to west include

illustrate further oxide potential:

‒ 36m at 1.27g/t (from 33m) in RRC260,

and

‒ 24m at 1.24g/t (from 48m) in RRC262

‒ Refer to Appendix 2 of HTI

announcement 14 November 2012 for

full details

Approximately 50 strike-km remains to be

explored.

Last explored 2003

Rustlers Roost – Resource Upside

23

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

Page 24: 1M ounce Mt Bundy Gold Project

Resource Upside – New Discoveries

24

Project contains all key attributes of Pine Creek-style, quartz-hosted gold mineralisation:

‒ Favourable stratigraphic units (Mount Bonnie, Burrell Creek, Koolpin).

‒ Structural setting (anticlines and shear zones) and,

‒ Proximity to granite intrusions (Mount Bundy, Mount Goyder intrusive).

History of success with basic

mapping and geochem techniques.

E.g. first 11 samples of outcropping

Toms Gully quartz reef averaged

9.6g/t.

Full details of sampling provided in

Appendix 2 of HTI’s ASX

announcement of 14 November 2012

All Resources (TG, RR, Quest) have

strong surface expression.

Minimal Regional exploration since

1990’s

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

Page 25: 1M ounce Mt Bundy Gold Project

Resource Upside – New Discoveries

25

Large drill & geochemical surface databases - Mine the db!

‒ 2,700 drill holes; 180km drilling;

‒ Rock-chips: 2,691 values; 69 values above 5g/t. max 88.2g/t Au

‒ Soils: 42,696 values ; 2,200 values above 1.0g/t., max 159g/t Au

‒ Full details of sampling provided in Appendix 2 of HTI’s ASX announcement of 14 November 2012

‒ ~ 60 targets identified but, drilling and geochem is clustered around the known deposits…

Toms Gully – surprisingly poor coverage; Priority

Rustlers Roost

‒ Several large (to 1.5km x 400m), 100ppb soil anomalies remain to be drill tested

‒ Rock-chips include: 26.1g/t 16.4g/t, 5.2g/t, and 4.0g/t.

‒ ~ 50km strike remains untested

Quest

‒ Several large (to 2km x 800m), +10ppb anomalies remain to be drill tested.

‒ Rock-chips include: 7.2g/t (and 1,600g/t Ag), 3g/t, and 3.3g/t.

MAJORITY OF PROJECT REMAINS UN-EXPLORED USING MODERN EXPLORATION TECHNIQUES

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

Page 26: 1M ounce Mt Bundy Gold Project

Primary Gold – Investment Summary

26

Delivering on promises

Targeting first production Sept Qtr 2014 – Toms Gully

‒ Low cost, rapid start-up, fast payback

‒ C1 costs A$663/oz, C3 costs A$903/oz, spot Au A$1,444/oz

‒ Ramping-up to 65k ounces p.a., 5 year mine life

‒ project cash flow: A$40million EBITDA p.a., A$121million over 5 years

Growth potential

‒ Toms Gully remains open down dip

‒ A$3m allocated to follow priority targets

‒ Rustlers Roost – positive scoping study, not drilled since 2003, geochem targets identified

‒ Lack of regional exploration, multiple targets to follow-up

Strong and experienced Board, established credentials in gold sector

Attractive investment proposition:

‒ $11 EV/Measured + Indicated oz compared to peer avg. of $32/oz

‒ $52 EV/Reserve oz compared to $382/oz (avg.) for Producers

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

Page 27: 1M ounce Mt Bundy Gold Project

JORC Statements

27

Toms Gully - The information in this market announcement is extracted from the reports entitled July 2013 Toms Gully Resource Estimate, announced 3

July 2013 and Toms Gully Ore Reserve Estimate Summary Report, August 2013, announced 27 August 2013. Both reports are available to view on

www.primarygold.com.au.

Primary Gold Limited confirms it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information in the original market announcements

relating to Toms Gully mineral resources and ore reserves, that all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the Toms Gully mineral

resource estimate continue to apply and have not materially changed. The company confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person’s

findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcement.

The information in this announcement that relates to Toms Gully exploration targets and associated exploration results are based on, and fairly represent,

information and supporting documentation compiled and prepared by Mr Clay Gordon who is a Member of The Australasian Institute of Mining and

Metallurgy and Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Mr Gordon is a full-time employee and shareholder of Primary Gold Limited.

Mr Gordon has sufficient experience which is relevant to the styles of mineralisation and types of deposit under consideration and to the activity being

undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral

Resources and Ore Reserves’.

Mr Gordon has provided prior written consent as to the form and context in which the Exploration Targets and the supporting information are presented in

this market announcement.

Rustlers Roost - Represents Primary Gold’s 80% interest. The information in this announcement that relates to the regional exploration results and

Rustlers Roost Mineral Resource is based on information reviewed and compiled by Mr Brian Fitzpatrick, who is a Member of The Australasian Institute

of Mining and Metallurgy with Chartered Professional accreditation. Mr Fitzpatrick is a full-time employee of Cube Consulting Pty Ltd and has sufficient

experience which is relevant to the styles of mineralisation and types of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify

as a Competent Person as defined in the 2004 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore

Reserves’. Mr Fitzpatrick consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

Primary Gold Mineral Resources & Ore Reserves, Competent Person’s Statements:

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

Page 28: 1M ounce Mt Bundy Gold Project

Contacts

Clay Gordon Sarah Geall

Primary Gold Limited

Managing Director

+61 8 9488 8874

[email protected]

FTI Consulting

+61 8 9485 8888

[email protected]

28

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y