1um cmos process baseline electrical test summary
DESCRIPTION
1um CMOS Process Baseline Electrical Test Summary. Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center. Summary Package Outline. Overall Summary - pages 3 - 8 Front End Summary - pages 9 - 65 test structure description and methodology theoretical expected value measured value results - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 1
1um CMOS Process BaselineElectrical Test Summary
Georgia Tech
Microelectronics Research Center
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 2
Summary Package Outline
• Overall Summary - pages 3 - 8
• Front End Summary - pages 9 - 65– test structure description and methodology
– theoretical expected value
– measured value results
• Back End Summary - pages 66 - 110– test structure description and methodology
– theoretical expected value
– measured value results
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 3
CMOS Baseline summary
• Overall Summary of CMOS baseline– NMOS transistor yield is 30% for 3um < L < 25um. Below 3um yield falls to 20% due to
punch-thru.– PMOS transistor yield is 25% for 3um < L < 25um. Below 3um yield falls to 5% due to
punch-thru.– Many front end parameters have median values close to target however standard
deviation is high as can be seen in % pass on summary page or in the raw data throughout the presentation.
– Contact parameters are the most off target and would be the first area to address in improving the CMOS line. (Contact experiment has since been completed. See separate presentation summary for results).
• What is the baseline?– The baseline consists of 5 batches with a total of 37 wafers. Each batch was processed
individually and separately between 2001 - 2003 timeframe in the MiRC cleanroom.– Batch 6 showed the best overall performance across all parameters and notably had a
60% NMOS transistor yield and 70% PMOS transistor yield.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 4
Front & Back End Summary
Contact parameters are the parameters which are most off target, followed by field oxide thickness, NMOS threshold voltage, and M1 serpentine Resistance.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 5
Overall Transistor Yield
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
PM
OS
% p
ass
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
L
5
10
50
W
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
% p
ass
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
L
5
10
50
W
NMOS PMOS
Note that transistor yield shows a dependency on channel length. For channel lengths = 3um and greater yield is fairly constant. For channel lengths 2um and lower, the yield degrades due to punchthru.
Transistor Yield is defined as threshold voltage, saturation current, and off current all being in control limits for a given die. The % of good die on a wafer can then be calculated and averaged over all of the batches.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 6
NMOS & PMOS Off Current (A)W=10 m, L=varying, Log10 scale
LOG
10(S
ourc
e Le
akag
e C
urre
nt)
-9
-8
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
1 1.3 1.5 2 3 5 10 25
L
LOG
10(S
ourc
e Le
akag
e C
urre
nt)
-10
-9
-8
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
1 1.3 1.5 2 3 5 10 25
L
punch-thru
Below channel length of 3um, the OFF state current increases rapidly. The current shown is the current from the source due to the bias at the drain. Therefore it is punch-thru. (This data is from batch 6 wafer 6 and is typical of the baseline.)
NMOS PMOS
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 7
NMOS & PMOS IDS VS. VDS CURVESW/L = 10um/3um
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
1.25
1.50ID
S (
mA
)
-8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
VDS
1
2
3
4
5
6
abs(VGS)
PMOS NMOS
IDS vs. VDS curves are shown from one of the better performing batches (Batch 6 wafer 1) from a W/L = 10um/ 3um transistor.At, VDS=VGS=5V, NMOS and PMOS saturation current is 1.14mA and 0.35mA respectively.Normalizing for transistor width (W=10um), NMOS and PMOS saturation currents are 0.114mA/um and 0.035mA/um respectively.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 8
Subthreshold Slope and Drain InducedBarrier Lowering (DIBL)
1e-8
1e-7
1e-6
1e-5
1e-4
LO
G S
CA
LE
IDS
.00 .20 .40 .60 .80 1.00
VGS
0.1
5
VDS
1e-9
1e-8
1e-7
1e-6
1e-5
abs(
ID)
-2.4 -2.2 -2 -1.8 -1.6 -1.4
VGS
-5
-0.1
VDS
PMOS NMOS
Sub-threshold curves are shown from one of the better performing batches (Batch 6 wafer 1).NMOS and PMOS sub-threshold slopes are both 150mV/decade.
NMOS and PMOS DIBL are 10mV/V and 20mV/V respectively.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 9
Front End Parameter Summary
• Front End Parameters which are analyzed in this presentation are listed below and are covered on slides 7-61.
– N+, P+, Poly sheet resistance– Poly CD– Poly COMB leakage– Poly serpentine resistance– NMOS & PMOS gate oxide thickness– N-Well & P-Well field oxide thickness– NMOS & PMOS
• Threshold Voltage• Saturation & Linear current• Off current
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 10
N+ Sheet Resistance Structure
1
2 4 6 8 10
3 5 7 9
“wide” structure (216.5 m long x 4.5 m wide)
Van der pauw structure
There are two N+ sheet resistance measurements made. One is made on the “wide” structure, the other is made on the Van der pauw structure. A maximum current of 100mA is forced (IF) between pads 9 and 1 with an applied 1V, and a voltage drop is measured (VM) at
pads given in the table below.
IFH IFL VMH VML Calc
Wide 9 1 6 3 RS = {(VMH - VML ) / IFH} / (216.5/4.5)
Van der pauw 9 1 4 2 RS = {(VMH - VML ) / IFH} * ( / ln 2 )
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 11
N+ Sheet Resistance Theoretical Value
The N+S/D As Implant has a dose of 5.74E19/cm3 and a junction depth of 1.6um after 1 hour of annealing at 950C.
Arsenic Diffusion
1.E+13
1.E+14
1.E+15
1.E+16
1.E+17
1.E+18
1.E+19
1.E+20
1.E+21
1.E+22
1.E-06 1.E-05 1.E-04 1.E-03 1.E-02
depth (cm)
do
se (
cm-3
)
As N+S/D (t=1sec)
As N+S/D (t=1hr)
B11 Vt (t=1sec)
B11 Vt (t=1hr)
p- substrate
p- substrate + Vt(1hr)
xj=1.6um
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 12
N+ Sheet Resistance Theoretical Value
= q(nn + pp)
for N-type material,
qnn
1/{(1.6E-19 C)(5.74E19 cm-3 )(~23* cm2/V-s)}
4.7E-3 cm
Rs = / xj
1/
For N+S/D, a 5E15, 160keV As implant is used, and a 1 hr anneal at 950C is performed
Therefore n = 5.74E19 cm-3 and xj = 1.6m
= (4.7E-3 cm) / (1.6E-4 cm)
Rs = 29.6 / �*P.M.Rousseau, et.al., ”A Model for Mobility Degradation in Highly Doped Arsenic Layers”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 43, p.2025, 1996.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 13
VD
P: N
+ sh
eet r
ho (
Ohm
s/sq
)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
11 13 16 24 25 3 4 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 6 7 8 M2 M4 M7
3 4 5 6 8
wafer within batch
N+ Sheet Resistance (/) Measured ValueVan der Pauw Method, Target = 30 /
VD
P: N
+ sh
eet r
ho (
Ohm
s/sq
)
1e-4
1e-2
1e+0
1e+2
1e+4
1e+6
1e+8
1e+10
1e+12
1e+14
11 13 16 24 25 3 4 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 6 7 8 M2 M7
3 4 5 6 8
wafer within batch
Full Scale
0 to 150 / Scale
Target = 30 / �
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 14
WID
E: N
+ sh
eet r
ho (
Ohm
s/sq
)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
11 13 16 24 25 3 4 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 6 7 8 M2 M4 M7
3 4 5 6 8
wafer within batch
N+ Sheet Resistance (/) Measured Value Wide structure method, Target = 30 /
WID
E: N
+ sh
eet r
ho (
Ohm
s/sq
)
1e-1
1e+1
1e+3
1e+5
1e+7
1e+9
1e+118e+11
11 13 16 24 25 3 4 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 6 7 8 M2 M7
3 4 5 6 8
wafer within batch
Full Scale
0 to 150/Scale
Target =
30 /
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 15
1e-4
1e-3
1e-2
1e-1
1e+0
1e+1
1e+2
1e+3
1e+4
1e+5
1e+6
1e+7
1e+8
1e+9
1e+10
1e+11
1e+12
1e+13
1e+14
VD
P: N
+ sh
eet r
ho (
Ohm
s/sq
)
1e-4 1e-2 1e+0 1e+2 1e+4 1e+6 1e+8 1e+10 1e+12 1e+14
WIDE: N+ sheet rho (Ohms/sq)
3
4
5
6
8
batch
N+ Sheet Resistance (/) Measured ValueVan der pauw Method compared to Wide Method
Unity line
The Van der pauw method data seems aberrant as it is several orders of magnitude higher than the Wide method and it appears to get worse with higher resistance values. It seems that the Wide method is more accurate as it produces more values closer to the theoretical target. In either case, both methods show there are many die with excessively high sheet resistance.
Theoretical
Target = 30 /
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 16
N+ Sheet Resistance (/ ) Measured ValueSummary
Mean = 47.8 / Target = 30 / Average % Pass = 63%
Using the Wide Method data, the mean of all the wafer medians is 47.8 /, excluding wafers with values marked in red.Using a LCL = 3 and UCL = 150, the average % of good die for a given wafer is 61% (no wafers excluded).
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 17
P+ Sheet Resistance Structure
1
2 4 6 8 10
3 5 7 9
“wide” structure (217 m long x 4.5 m wide)
Van der pauw structure
There are two P+ sheet resistance measurements made. One is made on the “wide” structure, the other is made on the Van der pauw structure. A maximum current of 100mA is forced (IF) between pads 9 and 1 with an applied 1V, and a voltage drop is measured (VM) at
pads given in the table below.
IFH IFL VMH VML Calc
Wide 9 1 6 3 RS = {(VMH - VML ) / IFH} / (217/4.5)
Van der pauw 9 1 4 2 RS = {(VMH - VML ) / IFH} * ( / ln 2 )
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 18
P+ Sheet Resistance Theoretical Value
= q(nn + pp)
for P-type material,
qpp
1/{(1.6E-19 C)(4.6E20 cm-3 )(~35* cm2/V-s)}
3.9E-4 cm
Rs = / xj
1/
For P+S/D, a 5E15, 30keV B11 implant is used,Therefore n = Cp = 4.6E20 cm-3 and xj = 0.100m
= (3.9E-4 cm) / (1E-5 cm)
Rs = 39 / �*G.Masetti, et.al., ”Modeling of Carrier Mobility Against Carrier Concentration in Arsenic-, Phosphorus-, and Boron-Doped Silicon”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 30, p.764, 1983.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 19
P+ Sheet Resistance (/)Van der Pauw Method, Target = 39 /
VD
P: P
+ sh
eet r
ho (
Ohm
s/sq
)
1e-4
1e-2
1e+0
1e+2
1e+4
1e+6
1e+8
1e+10
1e+12
1e+14
11 13 16 24 25 3 4 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 6 7 8 M2 M7
3 4 5 6 8
wafer within batch
Full Scale
0 to 120 /
Scale
VD
P: P
+ sh
eet r
ho (
Ohm
s/sq
)
0102030405060708090
100110120
11 13 16 24 25 3 4 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 6 7 8 M2 M7
3 4 5 6 8
wafer within batch
Target = 39 /
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 20
P+ Sheet Resistance (/)Wide structure method, Target = 39 /
WID
E: P
+ sh
eet r
ho (
Ohm
s/sq
)
1e-4
1e-2
1e+0
1e+2
1e+4
1e+6
1e+8
1e+10
11 13 16 24 25 3 4 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 6 7 8 M2 M7
3 4 5 6 8
wafer within batch
WID
E: P
+ sh
eet r
ho (
Ohm
s/sq
)
0102030405060708090
100110120
11 13 16 24 25 3 4 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 6 7 8 M2 M7
3 4 5 6 8
wafer within batch
Full Scale
0 to 120 /
Scale
Target = 39 /
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 21
P+ Sheet Resistance (/) Measured ValueVan der pauw Method compared to Wide Method
1e-4
1e-3
1e-2
1e-1
1e+0
1e+1
1e+2
1e+3
1e+4
1e+5
1e+6
1e+7
1e+8
1e+9
1e+10
1e+11
1e+12
1e+13
1e+14
VD
P: P
+ sh
eet r
ho (
Ohm
s/sq
)
1e-4 1e-2 1e+0 1e+2 1e+4 1e+6 1e+8 1e+10 1e+12 1e+14
WIDE: P+ sheet rho (Ohms/sq)
3
4
5
6
8
batch
Unity line
Theoretical Target = 39 /
The Van der pauw method data seems aberrant as it is several orders of magnitude higher than the Wide method and it appears to get worse with higher resistance values. It seems that the Wide method is more accurate as it produces more values closer to the theoretical target. In either case, both methods show there are many die with excessively high sheet resistance.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 22
P+ Sheet Resistance (/) Measured ValueSummary
Mean = 49.3 /Target = 39 /Average % Pass = 48%
Using the Wide Method data, the mean of all the wafer medians is 49.3 /, excluding wafers with values marked in red.Using a LCL = 3 and UCL = 120, the average % of good die for a given wafer is 48% (no wafers excluded).
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 23
Poly Sheet Resistance Structure
1
2 4 6 8 10
3 5 7 9
“wide” structure (217 m long x 6 m wide)
Van der pauw structure
“narrow 1 CD” structure (202.5 m long x 2 m wide)
“narrow 2 CD” structure (245 m long x 2 m wide)
IFH IFL VMH VML Calc
Wide 9 1 6 3 RS = {(VMH - VML ) / IFH} / (217/4.5)
Van der pauw
9 1 4 2 RS = {(VMH - VML ) / IFH} * ( / ln 2 )
Narrow 1 CD
9 1 7 5 CD = (202.5* RSWIDE) / {(VMH - VML ) / IFH}
Narrow 2 CD
9 1 10 8 CD = (245*RSWIDE) / {(VMH - VML ) / IFH}
“narrow 1 CD”
“narrow 2 CD”
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 24
Poly Sheet Resistance Theoretical Value
Rs = 49 / �
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 25
Poly Sheet Resistance (/)Van der Pauw Method, Target = 49 /
VD
P: P
L sh
eet r
ho (
Ohm
s/sq
)
1e-1
1e+1
1e+3
1e+5
1e+7
1e+9
1e+11
1e+13
11 13 16 24 25 3 4 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 6 7 8 M2 M7
3 4 5 6 8
wafer within batch
VD
P: P
L sh
eet r
ho (
Ohm
s/sq
)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
11 13 16 24 25 3 4 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 6 7 8 M2 M7
3 4 5 6 8
wafer within batch
Full Scale
0 to 150 /
Scale
Target = 49 /
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 26
Poly Sheet Resistance (/)Wide structure method, Target = 49 /
WID
E: P
L sh
eet r
ho (
Ohm
s/sq
)
1e-1
1e+1
1e+3
1e+5
1e+7
1e+9
1e+11
11 13 16 24 25 3 4 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 6 7 8 M2 M7
3 4 5 6 8
wafer within batch
WID
E: P
L sh
eet r
ho (
Ohm
s/sq
)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
11 13 16 24 25 3 4 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 6 7 8 M2 M7
3 4 5 6 8
wafer within batch
Full Scale
0 to 150 /
Scale
Target = 49 /
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 27
Poly Sheet Resistance (/) Measured ValueVan der pauw Method compared to Wide Method
1e-4
1e-3
1e-2
1e-1
1e+0
1e+1
1e+2
1e+3
1e+4
1e+5
1e+6
1e+7
1e+8
1e+9
1e+10
1e+11
1e+12
1e+13
VD
P: P
L sh
eet r
ho (
Ohm
s/sq
)
1e-4 1e-3 1e-2 1e-1 1e+01e+1 1e+21e+31e+4 1e+51e+61e+7 1e+81e+9 1e+11 1e+13
WIDE: PL sheet rho (Ohms/sq)
3
4
5
6
8
batchUnity line
Theoretical Target = 49 /
The Van der pauw method data seems aberrant as it is several orders of magnitude higher than the Wide method and it appears to get worse with higher resistance values. It seems that the Wide method is more accurate as it produces more values closer to the theoretical target. In either case, both methods show there are many die with excessively high sheet resistance.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 28
Poly Sheet Resistance (/) Measured ValueSummary
Mean = 44.3 /Target = 49 /Average % Pass = 53%
Using the Wide Method data, the mean of all the wafer medians is 44.3 /, excluding those wafers with values marked in red.Using a LCL = 3 and UCL = 150, the average % of good die for a given wafer is 53% (no wafers excluded).
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 29
Poly CD Narrow #1 & #2 (m)Target = 2m
CD
PLN
AR
R1
(um
)
1e-41e-3
1e-21e-1
1e+01e+1
1e+21e+3
1e+41e+51e+6
1e+7
11 13 16 24 25 3 4 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 6 7 8 M2 M7
3 4 5 6 8
wafer within batch
3
4
5
6
8
batchC
DP
LNA
RR
2 (u
m)
1e-41e-3
1e-11e+0
1e+2
1e+41e+5
1e+71e+8
11 13 16 24 25 3 4 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 6 7 8 M2 M7
3 4 5 6 8
wafer within batch
Full Scale
Full Scale
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 30
Poly CD Narrow #1 & #2 (m)Target = 2m
CD
PLN
AR
R1
(um
)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11 13 16 24 25 3 4 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 6 7 8 M2 M7
3 4 5 6 8
wafer within batch
3
4
5
6
8
batch
CD
PLN
AR
R2
(um
)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11 13 16 24 25 3 4 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 6 7 8 M2 M7
3 4 5 6 8
wafer within batch
0 to 10mScale
0 to 10mScale
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 31
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
CD
PLN
AR
R2
(um
)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
CDPLNARR1 (um)
3
4
5
6
8
batch
Poly CD Narrow #1 & #2 comparison
Unity line
Target = 2 m
There does not appear to be a printing bias between CD Narrow 1 & 2.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 32
Poly CD Narrow Summary
Mean = 3.4 mTarget = 2 mAverage % Pass = 56%
The mean of all the wafer medians is 3.4 m, excluding those wafers with values marked in red.Using a LCL = 0.1 m and UCL = 6 m, the average % of good die for a given wafer is 56% (no wafers excluded).
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 33
Poly COMB & Serpentine Structure
1 3 5 7 9
2 4 6 8 10
COMB & Serpentine #1 COMB & Serpentine #2
(duplicate of #1)
serpentineleftcomb
right comb
Poly CD = 2mSpace = 2mserpentine length = 6,764m
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 34
Poly COMB & SerpentineParameter Hi Lo Conditions Unit Valid Hi Valid Lo
RPLSERP1 1 6 Force 1V. Measure I. Calculate R. Compliance = 0.1A
Ohms Inf 10
IPLCOMB1U 3 1, 6 Force 1V. Measure I. Compliance = 0.1A
Amps 0.1 1E-12
IPLCOMB1L 4 1, 6 Force 1V. Measure I. Compliance = 0.1A
Amps 0.1 1E-12
RPLSERP2 5 10 Force 1V. Measure I. Calculate R. Compliance = 0.1A
Ohms Inf 10
IPLCOMB2U 7 5, 10 Force 1V. Measure I. Compliance = 0.1A
Amps 0.1 1E-12
IPLCOMB2L 8 5, 10 Force 1V. Measure I. Compliance = 0.1A
Amps 0.1 1E-12
The serpentine poly line is connected to pad 5 & 10 on structure #2 and pad 1 & 6 on structure #1. The purpose of the serpentine structure is to measure its resistance and monitor for “opens” due to incomplete patterning. The serpentine is long and winding in order to make it susceptible to lithography and etch patterning problems.
A poly comb lies on either side of the serpentine poly. The comb is electrically isolated from the serpentine line. The purpose of the comb is to measure leakage current between it and the poly serpentine and monitor for “shorts”. Shorts would be caused by remaining poly electrically connecting the comb to the poly serpentine line. On structure #2, pads 7 & 9 connect to the comb to the left of the serpentine and pad 8 connects to the comb to the right of the serpentine. On the structure #1, pad 3 connects to the comb on the left of the serpentine, and pads 2 & 4 connect to the comb on the right of the serpentine.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 35
Poly COMB leakage (A)Target = 1E-12 A
A good die from Batch 3, Wafer 4 was compared to a bad die from Batch 5 wafer 4. The findings are presented on the next slide.
IPLC
OM
B1L
1e-15
1e-13
1e-11
1e-9
1e-7
1e-5
1e-3
11 13 16 24 25 3 4 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 6 7 8 M7
3 4 5 6 8
wafer within batch
3
4
5
6
8
batch
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 36
Poly COMB Good vs. Bad comparison
BADGOODBatch 3, wafer 4, die (5,8) Batch 5, wafer 4, die (4,6)
Space visible betweenPoly lines.
Space not visible between Poly lines. Lines are shorted together. CONCLUSION: Polysilicon lithography either underdeveloped or underexposed. Not a problem with Etching.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 37
Poly COMB Summary
Mean = 1.3E-12 ATarget = 1E-12 AAverage % Pass = 66%
The mean of all the wafer medians is 1.3E-12A, excluding those wafers with values marked in red.Using a LCL = 0 and UCL = 1E-9, the average % of good die for a given wafer is 66% (not excluding any wafers).
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 38
Poly Serpentine Resistance ()Target = 166 k
RP
LSE
RP
1
1e+21e+31e+41e+51e+61e+71e+81e+9
1e+101e+111e+121e+131e+14
11 13 16 24 25 3 4 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 6 7 8 M7
3 4 5 6 8
wafer within batch
Poly CD = 2mserpentine length = 6,764m
6,764m /2m = 3,382 �
3,382 * (49 � /) = 166k
Target = 166k
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 39
Poly Serpentine Resistance () Summary
Median = 184 kTarget = 166 kAverage % Pass = 33%
The median of all the wafer medians is 184 k, excluding wafers whose values are marked in red.Using a LCL = 16 k and UCL = 497 k , the average % of good die for a given wafer is 47% (not excluding any wafers).
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 40
Gate & Field Oxide Structure
1 3 5 7 9
2 4 6 8 10
Gate S D Well Calc
NMOS Gate Oxide 5 3 4 10 Capacitance is measured at +/-5VDC (inversion/accumulation) with 25mVAC @ 100kHz. Thickness is calculated using C=A/t.
P-Well Field Oxide 6 7 8 10 “
PMOS Gate Oxide* 5 3 4 10 “
N-Well Field Oxide* 6 7 8 10 “
*The PMOS Gate & N-Well Field structures are in a row adjacent to the row shown above with an identical layout except for it is in an N-Well region and the S/D diffusion is P+.
100 m x 100 m
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 41
NMOS Inversion Gate Oxide Thickness (Å)Target = 300 Å
TIN
GO
X
1e+2
1e+36e+2
4e+2
2e+2
1e+46e+3
4e+3
2e+3
2e+4
3e+4
11 13 16 24 25 3 4 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9
3 4 5 6
wafer within batch
3
4
5
6
batch
TIN
GO
X
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
11 13 16 24 25 3 4 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9
3 4 5 6
wafer within batch
Full Scale
200 to 1000 ÅScale
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 42
NMOS Inversion Gate Oxide Thickness Summary
Mean = 320 ÅTarget = 300 ÅAverage % Pass = 37%
The mean of all the wafer medians is 320 Å, excluding the wafers with values in red.Using a LCL = 200 Å and UCL = 400 Å, the average % of good die for a given wafer is 37%, not excluding any wafers.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 43
PMOS Inversion Gate Oxide Thickness (Å)Target = 300 Å
TIP
GO
X
1e+2
1e+36e+2
4e+2
2e+2
1e+46e+3
4e+3
2e+3
2e+4
3e+4
11 13 16 24 25 3 4 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9
3 4 5 6
wafer within batch
TIP
GO
X
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
11 13 16 24 25 3 4 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9
3 4 5 6
wafer within batch
Full Scale
200 to 1000 ÅScale
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 44
PMOS Inversion Gate Oxide Thickness Summary
Mean = 304 ÅTarget = 300 ÅAverage % Pass = 22%
The mean of all the wafer medians is 304 Å, excluding the wafers with values in red.Using a LCL = 200 Å and UCL = 400 Å, the average % of good die for a given wafer is 22%, not excluding any wafers.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 45
N and P-Well Accumulation Field Oxide Thickness (Å)Target = 6500 Å
TAN
FO
X
1e+3
1e+4
7e+3
5e+3
3e+3
2e+3
2e+4
3e+4
4e+4
11 13 16 24 25 3 4 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9
3 4 5 6
wafer within batch
P-Well
N-Well
TAP
FO
X
1e+3
1e+46e+3
4e+3
2e+3
1e+5
6e+4
4e+4
2e+4
2e+5
11 13 24 25 3 4 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9
3 4 5 6
wafer within batch
6500 ÅTarget
6500 ÅTarget
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 46
N-Well Accumulation Field Oxide Thickness Summary
Mean = 2689 ÅTarget = 6500 ÅAverage % Pass = 2%
The mean of all the wafer medians is 2689 Å, excluding the wafers with values in red.Using a LCL = 5500 Å and UCL = 7500 Å, the average % of good die for a given wafer is 2%, not excluding any wafers.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 47
P-Well Accumulation Field Oxide Thickness Summary
Mean = 3173 ÅTarget = 6500 ÅAverage % Pass = 6%
The mean of all the wafer medians is 3173 Å, excluding the wafers with values in red.Using a LCL = 5500 Å and UCL = 7500 Å, the average % of good die for a given wafer is 6%, not excluding any wafers.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 48
Transistor Structure
1 3 5 7 9
2 4 6 8 10
All NMOS & PMOS transistors have the same basic layout as above for W= 5, 10, & 50 um.
Each row contains a unique L. Shown above is L = 25m. The variations of L are 1, 1.3, 1.5, 2, 3, 5, 10, 25 m.
So there are 2 (NMOS/PMOS) x 8(various L) = 16 rows. In each row there are 3 transistors, so there are 3 x 16 = 48 unique transistors.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 49
NMOS & PMOS Threshold Voltage (V)W=5 m, L=varying*
NM
OS
Vt
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
11
.31
.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25
L
11 24 25 3 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 7 8 wafer
3 4 5 6 8 batch
PM
OS
Vt
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
3 11
.31
.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.5 2 3 25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25
L
1
1
24 25 3 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 7 8 wafer
3 4 5 6 8 batch
*For each wafer L varies from left to right in the following order: 1, 1.3, 1.5, 2, 3, 5, 10, 25 m.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 50
NMOS & PMOS Threshold Voltage (V)W=10 m, L=varying*
NM
OS
Vt
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
11
.31
.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25
1.3 2 3 5 10
25 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25
L
11 24 25 3 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 7 8 wafer
3 4 5 6 8 batch
PM
OS
Vt
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
11
.31
.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1 2 3 5 10
25
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25
L
11 24 25 3 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 7 8 wafer
3 4 5 6 8 batch
*For each wafer L varies from left to right in the following order: 1, 1.3, 1.5, 2, 3, 5, 10, 25 m.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 51
NMOS & PMOS Threshold Voltage (V)W=50 m, L=varying*
NM
OS
Vt
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
11
.31
.5 2 3 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 10
25 1
1.3 2 3 10
25 2 3 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 10
25
1.3
1.5 2 3 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 10
25
L
11 24 25 3 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 7 8 wafer
3 4 5 6 8 batch
PM
OS
Vt
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
11
.31
.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3 2 3 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25
L
11 24 25 3 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 7 8 wafer
3 4 5 6 8 batch
*For each wafer L varies from left to right in the following order: 1, 1.3, 1.5, 2, 3, 5, 10, 25 m.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 52
NMOS Vt value and % Pass by Channel Width/Length
-0.2
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
NM
OS
Vt
Med
ian
valu
e
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
L
5
10
50
W
0.4
0.45
0.5
0.55
0.6
0.65
0.7
NM
OS
Vt
% p
ass
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
L
5
10
50
W
Yield degrades below L=3m
W=50m is offset towards 0
Mean = 147 mVTarget = 0.7 VAverage % Pass = 55%
The mean of all the wafer medians is 147 mV, excluding the wafers with values in red.Using a LCL = 0V and UCL = 3V, the average % of good die for a given wafer is 55%, not excluding any wafers.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 53
PMOS Vt value and % Pass by Channel Width/Length
-1.2
-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
PM
OS
Vt
Med
ian
valu
e
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
L
5
10
50
W
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
0.55
0.6
0.65
PM
OS
Vt
% p
ass
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
L
5
10
50
W
Yield degrades below L=3m
Mean = -608 mVTarget = -0.7VAverage % Pass = 48%
The mean of all the wafer medians is -608 mV.Using a LCL = -3V and UCL = 0V, the average % of good die for a given wafer is 48%. No wafers were excluded in either calculation.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 54
NMOS & PMOS Saturation Current (A)W=5 m, L=varying*, Log10 scale
NM
OS
ID
SA
T
-12-11-10-9-8-7-6-5-4-3-2-10
11
.31
.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25
L
11 24 25 3 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 7 8 wafer
3 4 5 6 8 batch
PM
OS
ID
SA
T
-13
-11
-9
-7
-5
-3
-1
11
.31
.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25
L
11 24 25 3 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 7 8 wafer
3 4 5 6 8 batch
*For each wafer L varies from left to right in the following order: 1, 1.3, 1.5, 2, 3, 5, 10, 25 m.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 55
NMOS & PMOS Saturation Current (A) W=10 m, L=varying*, Log10 scale
NM
OS
ID
SA
T
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
11
.31
.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25
L
11 24 25 3 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 7 8 wafer
3 4 5 6 8 batch
3
4
5
6
8
batch
PM
OS
ID
SA
T
-13
-11
-9
-7
-5
-3
-1
11
.31
.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25
L
11 24 25 3 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 7 8 wafer
3 4 5 6 8 batch
*For each wafer L varies from left to right in the following order: 1, 1.3, 1.5, 2, 3, 5, 10, 25 m.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 56
NMOS & PMOS Saturation Current (A) W=50 m, L=varying*, Log10 scale
NM
OS
ID
SA
T
-13
-11
-9
-7
-5
-3
-1
11
.31
.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25
L
11 24 25 3 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 7 8 wafer
3 4 5 6 8 batch
PM
OS
ID
SA
T
-13
-11
-9
-7
-5
-3
-1
11
.31
.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25
L
11 24 25 3 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 7 8 wafer
3 4 5 6 8 batch
*For each wafer L varies from left to right in the following order: 1, 1.3, 1.5, 2, 3, 5, 10, 25 m.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 57
NMOS IDsat value and % Pass by Channel Width/Length
-5
-4.5
-4
-3.5
-3
-2.5
NM
OS
Med
ian(
Log(
abs(
IDsa
t))
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
L
5
10
50
W
0.7
0.75
0.8
0.85
0.9
NM
OS
% p
ass
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
L 2
5
10
50
W
A % Pass was calculated using a LCL of 1E-6A.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 58
PMOS IDsat value and % Pass by Channel Width/Length
-4.5
-4
-3.5
-3
-2.5
-2
PM
OS
Med
ian(
Log(
abs(
IDsa
t))
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
L
5
10
50
W
0.75
0.8
0.85
0.9
PM
OS
% p
ass
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
L 2
5
10
50
W
A % Pass was calculated using a LCL of 1E-6A.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 59
NMOS & PMOS Off Current (A)W=5 m, L=varying*, Log10 scale
NM
OS
Dra
in L
ea
kag
e
-13
-11
-9
-7
-5
-3
-1
11
.31
.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25
L
11 24 25 3 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 6 7 8 wafer
3 4 5 6 8 batch
PM
OS
Dra
in L
eaka
ge
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
11
.31
.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25
L
11 24 25 3 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 6 7 8 wafer
3 4 5 6 8 batch
3
4
5
6
8
batch
*For each wafer L varies from left to right in the following order: 1, 1.3, 1.5, 2, 3, 5, 10, 25 m.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 60
NMOS & PMOS Off Current (A)W=10 m, L=varying*, Log10 scale
NM
OS
Dra
in L
ea
kag
e
-12-11-10-9-8-7-6-5-4-3-2-10
11
.31
.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25
L
11 24 25 3 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 6 7 8 wafer
3 4 5 6 8 batch
PM
OS
Dra
in L
ea
kag
e
-13
-11
-9
-7
-5
-3
-1
11
.31
.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25
L
11 24 25 3 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 6 7 8 wafer
3 4 5 6 8 batch
*For each wafer L varies from left to right in the following order: 1, 1.3, 1.5, 2, 3, 5, 10, 25 m.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 61
NMOS & PMOS Off Current (A)W=50 m, L=varying*, Log10 scale
NM
OS
Dra
in L
ea
kag
e
-13
-11
-9
-7
-5
-3
-1
11
.31
.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25
L
11 24 25 3 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 6 7 8 wafer
3 4 5 6 8 batch
PM
OS
Dra
in L
ea
kag
e
-13
-11
-9
-7
-5
-3
-1
11
.31
.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25 1
1.3
1.5 2 3 5 10
25
L
11 24 25 3 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 6 7 8 wafer
3 4 5 6 8 batch
*For each wafer L varies from left to right in the following order: 1, 1.3, 1.5, 2, 3, 5, 10, 25 m.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 62
NMOS IOFF value and % Pass by Channel Width/Length
-10
-9
-8
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
Med
ian(
Log1
0(ab
s(LD
)))
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
L
5
10
50
W
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
NM
OS
%p
ass
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
L
5
10
50
W
A % Pass was calculated using an UCL of 1E-6A.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 63
PMOS IOFF value and % Pass by Channel Width/Length
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
Med
ian(
Log1
0(ab
s(LD
)))
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
L
5
10
50
W
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
0.55
%pa
ss
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
L
5
10
50
W
A % Pass was calculated using an UCL of 1E-6A.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 64
Overall Transistor Yield
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
PM
OS
% p
ass
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
L
5
10
50
W
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
% p
ass
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
L
5
10
50
W
NMOS PMOS
Overall Transistor Yield was calculated by requiring each die to pass the control limits for Vt, Idsat, and Ioff simultaneously.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 65
W=10m Transistor Yield by Batch
NMOS
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
%pa
ss
0 5 10 15 20 25
L
3
4
5
6
8
batch
PMOS
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
%pa
ss
0 5 10 15 20 25
L
3
4
5
6
8
batch
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 66
Back End Parameter Summary
• Back End Parameters which are analyzed in this presentation are listed below and are covered on slides 63-106.
– N+, P+, Poly, single contact resistance
– N+, P+, Poly contact chain resistance
– Single VIA1 and chain VIA1 resistance
– M1 and M2 sheet resistance and CD’s
– M1 comb leakage and serpentine resistance
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 67
N+ Contact Resistance Structure
1 3 5 7 9
2 4 6 8 10
IFH IFL VMH VML Calc
N+ Contact Resistance 1
9 1 3 2 R = (VMH - VML ) / IFH
N+ Contact Resistance 2
9 1 5 4 R = (VMH - VML ) / IFH
N+ Contact Resistance 3
9 1 7 6 R = (VMH - VML ) / IFH
N+ Contact Resistance 4
9 1 10 8 R = (VMH - VML ) / IFH
3m x 3m contact
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 68
N+/P+ Contact Resistance Theoretical Value
DB NBc e
TqA
kR /)
**(
3
2*4**
h
kqmA
)(
)()(
2
2
cmA
cmRr cc
using ND=6E20cm-3 and B=0.72*
281.1 cmERc 289 cmEA
Then rc = 0.1 is the target N+ and Poly contact resistance. (Since Poly has
similar sheet resistance as N+, the Schottky Barrier height and doping is assumed to be close to the same and therefore the Poly Contact resistance is also assumed to be close to the same.)
*W.R.Runyan, K.E.Bean, Semiconductor Integrated Circuit Processing Technology, 1st edition, p.522-524, 1990.
using NA=4.6E20cm-3 and B=0.58*
Then rc = 1 is the target P+ contact resistance.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 69
N+ Contact Resistance ()Target = 0.1
RN
+CO
N1
1e-4
1e-2
1e+0
1e+2
1e+4
1e+6
1e+8
1e+10
1e+12
11 13 16 24 25 3 4 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 6 7 8 M2 M7
3 4 5 6 8
wafer within batch
N+ Contact Resistance is very high.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 70
N+ Contact Resistance Value and % Pass
Mean = 2E9 Target = 0.1 Average % Pass = 8%
The mean of all the wafer medians is 2E9 .Using a LCL = 0.001 and UCL = 100, the average % of good die for a given wafer is 8%.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 71
N+ Contact Chain Structure
1 3 5 7 9
2 4 6 8 10
VH, IH VL, IL Calc
N+ Contact Chain Resistance 1 1 2 R = (VH - VL ) / IH
N+ Contact Chain Resistance 2 3 4 R = (VH - VL ) / IH
N+ Contact Chain Resistance 3 5 6 R = (VH - VL ) / IH
N+ Contact Chain Resistance 4 7 8 R = (VH - VL ) / IH
N+ Contact Chain Resistance 5 9 10 R = (VH - VL ) / IH
104 contacts
There are 104 contacts, 100.2 squares of N+ diffusion, and 77.8 squares of M1. Using the theoretical values of N+ contact resistance, N+ sheet resistance and M1 sheet resistance found elsewhere in this document the theoretical target value for N+ contact chain is 5.0k.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 72
N+ Contact Chain Resistance ()Target = 5k
RN
+CC
1
1e+1
1e+2
1e+3
1e+4
1e+5
1e+6
1e+7
1e+8
1e+9
1e+10
1e+117e+11
11 24 25 3 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 6 7 8 M7
3 4 5 6 8
wafer within batch
3
4
5
6
8
batch
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 73
N+ Contact Chain Resistance Value and % Pass
Mean = 6E10 Target = 5 kAverage % Pass = 28%
The mean of all the wafer medians is 6E10 .Using a LCL = 1k and UCL = 100k , the average % of good die for a given wafer is 28%.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 74
P+ Contact Resistance Structure
1 3 5 7 9
2 4 6 8 10
IFH IFL VMH VML Calc
P+ Contact Resistance 1
9 1 3 2 R = (VMH - VML ) / IFH
P+ Contact Resistance 2
9 1 5 4 R = (VMH - VML ) / IFH
P+ Contact Resistance 3
9 1 7 6 R = (VMH - VML ) / IFH
P+ Contact Resistance 4
9 1 10 8 R = (VMH - VML ) / IFH
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 75
P+ Contact Resistance ()Target = 1
P+ Contact Resistance is very high.
RP
+CO
N1
1e-4
1e-2
1e+0
1e+2
1e+4
1e+6
1e+8
1e+10
1e+12
11 13 16 24 25 3 4 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 6 7 8 M2 M7
3 4 5 6 8
wafer within batch
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 76
P+ Contact Resistance Value & % Pass
Mean = 6E8 Target = 1Average % Pass = 15%
The mean of all the wafer medians is 6E8 .Using a LCL = 0.1 and UCL = 100 , the average % of good die for a given wafer is 15%.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 77
P+ Contact Chain Structure
1 3 5 7 9
2 4 6 8 10
VH, IH VL, IL Calc
P+ Contact Chain Resistance 1 1 2 R = (VH - VL ) / IH
P+ Contact Chain Resistance 2 3 4 R = (VH - VL ) / IH
P+ Contact Chain Resistance 3 5 6 R = (VH - VL ) / IH
P+ Contact Chain Resistance 4 7 8 R = (VH - VL ) / IH
P+ Contact Chain Resistance 5 9 10 R = (VH - VL ) / IH
There are 104 contacts, 100.2 squares of P+ diffusion, and 77.8 squares of M1. Using the theoretical values of P+ contact resistance, P+ sheet resistance and M1 sheet resistance found elsewhere in this document the theoretical target value for N+ contact chain is 4.0k.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 78
P+ Contact Chain Resistance ()Target = 4 k
RP
+CC
1
1e+1
1e+2
1e+3
1e+4
1e+5
1e+6
1e+7
1e+8
1e+9
1e+10
1e+116e+11
11 24 25 3 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 6 7 8 M7
3 4 5 6 8
wafer within batch
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 79
P+ Contact Chain Resistance Value and % Pass
Mean = 5.3E10 Target = 4 kAverage % Pass = 52%
The mean of all the wafer medians is 5E10 .Using a LCL = 1k and UCL = 100k , the average % of good die for a given wafer is 52%.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 80
Poly Contact Resistance Structure
1 3 5 7 9
2 4 6 8 10
IFH IFL VMH VML Calc
Poly Contact Resistance 1
9 1 3 2 R = (VMH - VML ) / IFH
Poly Contact Resistance 2
9 1 5 4 R = (VMH - VML ) / IFH
Poly Contact Resistance 3
9 1 7 6 R = (VMH - VML ) / IFH
Poly Contact Resistance 4
9 1 10 8 R = (VMH - VML ) / IFH
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 81
Poly Contact Resistance ()Target = 0.1
RP
LCO
N1
1e-4
1e-2
1e+0
1e+2
1e+4
1e+6
1e+8
1e+10
1e+12
11 13 16 24 25 3 4 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 6 7 8 M2 M7
3 4 5 6 8
wafer within batch
3
4
5
6
8
batch
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 82
Poly Contact Resistance Value and % Pass
Mean = 2.4E10 Target = 0.1Average % Pass = 11%
The mean of all the wafer medians is 2.4E10 .Using a LCL = 0.1 and UCL = 100 , the average % of good die for a given wafer is 11%.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 83
Poly Contact Chain Structure
1 3 5 7 9
2 4 6 8 10
VH, IH VL, IL Calc
Poly Contact Chain Resistance 1 1 2 R = (VH - VL ) / IH
Poly Contact Chain Resistance 2 3 4 R = (VH - VL ) / IH
Poly Contact Chain Resistance 3 5 6 R = (VH - VL ) / IH
Poly Contact Chain Resistance 4 7 8 R = (VH - VL ) / IH
Poly Contact Chain Resistance 5 9 10 R = (VH - VL ) / IH
There are 104 contacts, 100.2 squares of Poly, and 77.8 squares of M1. Using the theoretical values of Poly contact resistance, Poly sheet resistance and M1 sheet resistance found elsewhere in this document the theoretical target value for Poly contact chain is 4.9k.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 84
Poly Contact Chain Resistance ()Target = 4.9 k
RP
LCC
1
1e+11e+21e+31e+41e+51e+61e+71e+81e+9
1e+101e+111e+12
7e+12
11 24 25 3 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 6 7 8 M7
3 4 5 6 8
wafer within batch
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 85
Poly Contact Chain Resistance Value and % Pass
Mean = 1.3E11 Target = 4.9kAverage % Pass = 22%
The mean of all the wafer medians is 1.3E11 .Using a LCL = 1k and UCL = 100 k, the average % of good die for a given wafer is 22%.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 86
M1 Sheet Resistance Structure
1 3 5 7 9
2 4 6 8 10
“wide” structure (215 m long x 9 m wide)
Van der pauw structure
“narrow 1 CD”
“narrow 2 CD”
IFH IFL VMH VML Calc
Wide 9 1 6 3 RS = {(VMH - VML ) / IFH} / (217/4.5)
Van der pauw
9 1 4 2 RS = {(VMH - VML ) / IFH} * ( / ln 2 )
Narrow 1 CD
9 1 7 5 CD = (203* RSWIDE) / {(VMH - VML ) / IFH}
Narrow 2 CD
9 1 10 8 CD = (244*RSWIDE) / {(VMH - VML ) / IFH}
“narrow 1 CD” structure (203 m long x 3 m wide)
“narrow 2 CD” structure (244 m long x 3 m wide)
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 87
M1 & M2 Sheet Resistance Theoretical Value
3.4E-6 cm*
Rs = / xj
= (3.4E-6 cm) / (6000 E-8 cm)
Rs = 56.7 m/ for M1�
*W.R.Runyan, K.E.Bean, Semiconductor Integrated Circuit Processing Technology, 1st edition, p.535, 1990.
For Aluminum with 1% Silicon, the resistivity is
for M2, xj = 8000Åso Rs = 42.5 m/ �
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 88
M1 Sheet Resistance (m/ �)Van der Pauw Method, Target = 56.7 m/�
VD
P: M
1 sh
eet r
ho (
mO
hms/
sq)
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
11 13 16 24 25 3 4 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 6 7 8 M2 M7
3 4 5 6 8
wafer within batch
VD
P: M
1 sh
eet r
ho (
mO
hms/
sq)
1e+0
1e+2
1e+4
1e+6
1e+8
1e+10
1e+12
1e+14
11 13 16 24 25 3 4 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 6 7 8 M2 M7
3 4 5 6 8
wafer within batch
Full Scale
30 to 90 m/ �Scale
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 89
M1 Sheet Resistance (m/ �)Wide Structure Method, Target = 56.7 m/�
WID
E: M
1 sh
eet r
ho (
mO
hms/
sq)
1e-4
1e-2
1e+0
1e+2
1e+4
1e+6
1e+8
1e+10
1e+12
1e+14
11 13 16 24 25 3 4 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 6 7 8 M2 M7
3 4 5 6 8
wafer within batch
WID
E: M
1 sh
eet r
ho (
mO
hms/
sq)
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
11 13 16 24 25 3 4 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 6 7 8 M2 M7
3 4 5 6 8
wafer within batch
Full Scale
30 to 90 m/ �Scale
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 90
M1 VDP Sheet Resistance Value and % Pass
Mean = 57.2 m/�Target = 56.7 m/�Average % Pass = 70%
The mean of all the wafer medians is 57.2 m/, �excluding the wafers with values in red.Using a LCL = 10 m/ � and UCL = 100 m/ � , the average % of good die for a given wafer is 70%, not excluding any wafers.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 91
M1 CD Narrow #1 & #2 (m)Target = 3m
CD
M1N
AR
R1
(um
)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11 13 16 24 25 3 4 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 6 7 8 M2 M7
3 4 5 6 8
wafer within batch
CD
M1N
AR
R2
(um
)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11 13 16 24 25 3 4 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 6 7 8 M2 M7
3 4 5 6 8
wafer within batch
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 92
M1 CD Value and % Pass
Mean = 4.1 mTarget = 3 m Average % Pass = 47%
The mean of all the wafer medians is 4.1 m, excluding the wafers with values in red.Using a LCL = 1 m and UCL = 5.5 m , the average % of good die for a given wafer is 47%, not excluding any wafers.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 93
M1 COMB/SERP Structure
1 3 5 7 9
2 4 6 8 10
serpentineleftcomb
right comb
COMB & Serpentine #1
COMB & Serpentine #2 (duplicate of #1)
M1 CD = 3mSpace = 3mserpentine length = 4,504m
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 94
M1 COMB/SERP
Parameter Hi Lo Conditions Unit Valid Hi Valid Lo
RM1SERP1 1 6 Force 1V. Measure I. Calculate R. Compliance = 0.1A
Ohms Inf 10
IM1COMB1U 3 1, 6 Force 1V. Measure I. Compliance = 0.1A
Amps 0.1 1E-12
IM1COMB1L 4 1, 6 Force 1V. Measure I. Compliance = 0.1A
Amps 0.1 1E-12
RM1SERP2 5 10 Force 1V. Measure I. Calculate R. Compliance = 0.1A
Ohms Inf 10
IM1COMB2U 7 5, 10 Force 1V. Measure I. Compliance = 0.1A
Amps 0.1 1E-12
IM1COMB2L 8 5, 10 Force 1V. Measure I. Compliance = 0.1A
Amps 0.1 1E-12
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 95
M1 COMB leakage (A) Target = 1E-12A
IM1C
OM
B1L
1e-15
1e-13
1e-11
1e-9
1e-7
1e-5
1e-3
1e-1
11 13 16 24 25 3 4 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 6 7 8 M7
3 4 5 6 8
wafer within batch
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 96
M1 COMB leakage Value and % Pass
Mean = 1E-12ATarget = 1E-12AAverage % Pass = 82%
The median of all the wafer medians is 1E-12A.Using a LCL = 0 and UCL = 1E-9, the average % of good die for a given wafer is 82%.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 97
M1 Serpentine Resistance ()Target = 85
RM
1SE
RP
1
1e+0
1e+2
1e+4
1e+6
1e+8
1e+10
1e+12
1e+14
11 13 16 24 25 3 4 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 6 7 8 M7
3 4 5 6 8
wafer within batch
RM
1SE
RP
1
10
30
50
70
90
110
130
150
170
190
11 13 16 24 25 3 4 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 6 7 8 M7
3 4 5 6 8
wafer within batch
Full Scale
10 to 200 Scale
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 98
M1 Serpentine Resistance Value and %Pass
Mean = 200 Target = 85 Average % Pass = 63%
The mean of all the wafer medians is 200 , excluding the wafers with values in red.Using a LCL = 10 and UCL = 450 , the average % of good die for a given wafer is 63%, not excluding any wafers.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 99
M2 Sheet Resistance Structure
1 3 5 7 9
2 4 6 8 10
“wide” structure (216 m long x 9 m wide)
Van der pauw structure
“narrow 1 CD”
“narrow 2 CD”
“narrow 1 CD” structure (203 m long x 3 m wide)
“narrow 2 CD” structure (244 m long x 3 m wide)
IFH IFL VMH VML Calc
Wide 9 1 6 3 RS = {(VMH - VML ) / IFH} / (217/4.5)
Van der pauw
9 1 4 2 RS = {(VMH - VML ) / IFH} * ( / ln 2 )
Narrow 1 CD
9 1 7 5 CD = (203* RSWIDE) / {(VMH - VML ) / IFH}
Narrow 2 CD
9 1 10 8 CD = (244*RSWIDE) / {(VMH - VML ) / IFH}
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 100
M2 Sheet Resistance (m/ �)Van der Pauw Method, Target = 42.5 m/�
VD
P: M
2 sh
eet r
ho (
mO
hms/
sq)
1e-4
1e-2
1e+0
1e+2
1e+4
1e+6
1e+8
1e+10
1e+12
1e+14
1e+16
11 13 16 24 25 3 4 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 6 7 8 M2 M7
3 4 5 6 8
wafer within batch
VD
P: M
2 sh
eet r
ho (
mO
hms/
sq)
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
11 13 16 24 25 3 4 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 6 7 8 M2 M7
3 4 5 6 8
wafer within batch
Full Scale
30 to 90 m/ �Scale
Batch 4 & 5 did not receive M2 processing
Batch 4 & 5 did not receive M2 processing
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 101
M2 Sheet Resistance (m/ �)Wide Structure Method, Target = 42.5 m/�
WID
E: M
2 sh
eet r
ho (
mO
hms/
sq)
1e-4
1e-2
1e+0
1e+2
1e+4
1e+6
1e+8
1e+10
1e+12
1e+14
11 13 16 24 25 3 4 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 6 7 8 M2 M7
3 4 5 6 8
wafer within batch
WID
E: M
2 sh
eet r
ho (
mO
hms/
sq)
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
11 13 16 24 25 3 4 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 6 7 8 M2 M7
3 4 5 6 8
wafer within batch
Full Scale
30 to 90 m/ �Scale
Batch 4 & 5 did not receive M2 processing
Batch 4 & 5 did not receive M2 processing
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 102
M2 VDP Sheet Resistance Value and % Pass
Mean = 45.8 m/ �Target = 42.5 m/ �Average % Pass = 92%
The mean of all the wafer medians is 45.8 m/, �excluding batch 4 &5.Using a LCL = 10 m/ � and UCL = 100 m/ �, the average % of good die for a given wafer is 92%, excluding batch 4 &5.
Batch 4 & 5 did not receive M2 processing
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 103
M2 CD Narrow #1 & #2 (m)Target = 3m
CD
M2N
AR
R1
(um
)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11 13 16 24 25 3 4 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 6 7 8 M2 M7
3 4 5 6 8
wafer within batch
CD
M2N
AR
R2
(um
)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11 13 16 24 25 3 4 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 6 7 8 M2 M7
3 4 5 6 8
wafer within batch
Batch 4 & 5 did not receive M2 processing
Batch 4 & 5 did not receive M2 processing
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 104
M2 CD Narrow #1 Value and % Pass
Mean = 3.0 m
Target = 3 m
Average % Pass = 54%
The mean of all the wafer medians is 3.0 m, excluding the wafers with values in red.Using a LCL = 1 m and UCL = 5.5 m , the average % of good die for a given wafer is 54%, excluding batch 4 & 5 only.
Batch 4 & 5 did not receive M2 processing
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 105
M2 to M1 Via Structure
1 3 5 7 9
2 4 6 8 10
IFH IFL VMH VML Calc
VIA Resistance 1
9 1 3 2 R = (VMH - VML ) / IFH
VIA Resistance 2
9 1 5 4 R = (VMH - VML ) / IFH
VIA Resistance 3
9 1 7 6 R = (VMH - VML ) / IFH
VIA Resistance 4
9 1 10 8 R = (VMH - VML ) / IFH
M2 M1
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 106
M2 to M1 Via Resistance ()Target = 0.1
RM
1CO
N1
1e-1
1e+1
1e+3
1e+5
1e+7
1e+9
1e+11
1e+13
11 13 16 24 25 3 4 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 6 7 8 M2 M7
3 4 5 6 8
wafer within batch
3
4
5
6
8
batch
Batch 4 & 5 did not receive M2 processing
RM
1CO
N1
0
5
10
15
20
11 13 16 24 25 3 4 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 6 7 8 M2 M7
3 4 5 6 8
wafer within batch
Batch 4 & 5 did not receive M2 processing
Full Scale
0 to 20 Scale
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 107
M2 to M1 Via Resistance ()
Mean = 13.7 Target = 0.1 Average % Pass = 53%
The mean of all the wafer medians is 13.7 , excluding the wafers with values in red.Using a LCL = 0.1 and UCL = 100 , the average % of good die for a given wafer is 53%, excluding batch 4 & 5 only.
Batch 4 & 5 did not receive M2 processing
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 108
M2 to M1 Via Chain Resistance Structure
1 3 5 7 9
2 4 6 8 10
VH, IH VL, IL Calc
Via Chain Resistance 1 1 2 R = (VH - VL ) / IH
Via Chain Resistance 2 3 4 R = (VH - VL ) / IH
Via Chain Resistance 3 5 6 R = (VH - VL ) / IH
Via Chain Resistance 4 7 8 R = (VH - VL ) / IH
Via Chain Resistance 5 9 10 R = (VH - VL ) / IH
There are 104 VIA’s, 77.8 squares of M1, and 104 squares of M2. Using the theoretical values of VIA resistance, M1 & M2 sheet resistance found elsewhere in this document the theoretical target value for VIA chain is 19.
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 109
M2 to M1 Via Chain Resistance ()Target = 19
RM
1CC
1
1e+0
1e+2
1e+4
1e+6
1e+8
1e+10
1e+12
1e+14
11 24 25 3 10 16 21 4 6 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 1 12 2 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 6 7 8 M7
3 4 5 6 8
wafer within batch
D.K. Brown Georgia Tech Microelectronics Research Center 110
M2 to M1 Via Chain Resistance Value and % Pass
Mean = 4E11 Target = 19 Average % Pass = 0.4%
The mean of all the wafer medians is 13.7 , excluding the wafers with values in red.Using a LCL = 0.1 and UCL = 100 , the average % of good die for a given wafer is 53%, excluding batch 4 & 5 only.