2. review of literature 2.1. preambleshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/13005/7/07_chapter...
TRANSCRIPT
25
2. REVIEW OF LITERATURE
2.1. PREAMBLE
Antioxidants have possibly been used to preserve fats long before recorded
history. In prehistoric times, it is conceivable that aromatic plants were used to give
fats, to be used for medicinal purposes and foods, pleasant odors and flavors.
Retardation of oxidative reactions by certain compounds was first recorded by
Berthollet in 1926. Early workers explain the phenomenon as “catalysts poisoning”.
In the mid-nineteenth century, Chevreul observed that linseed oil dried much more
slowly in oak wood than on glass or natural surfacing; other woods had the same
effect but not to the same extent and observed that oak wood was an anti-drying agent
for linseed oil. The course of rancidification of fats remained unknown until Duclaux
demonstrated that atmospheric oxygen was the major causative agent of free fatty acid
oxidation. Several years later, perhaps, the first report of antioxidants used in fat was
by Deschamps observed that gum benzoin and poplar tree extracts could retard
rancidity of ointments made with lard. Wright observed that American Indians in the
Ohio Valley preserved bear fat using bark of the slippery elm and found that elm was
effective to preserve lard and butter fat. Elm bark was patented as an antioxidant 30
years later. Present knowledge of the properties of various chemicals to prevent
oxidative breakdown of fats and fatty foods began with the classic studies by Moureu
and Dufraise. During World War I and shortly thereafter these workers tested more
than 500 compounds for AA1. This basic research, combined with the vast importance
of oxidation in practically all manufacturing operations, triggered a search for
chemical additives to regulate oxidation.
According to The Mitochondrial Free Radical Theory of Aging2, free radicals
are a class of molecule with a very simple definition. The nature of atomic structure
26
and of the covalent chemical bond (the features that give an atom its valency) are
fixed by the rule that electrons occupy orbitals of atoms, such that an orbital can
contain zero, one or two electrons, and that electrons carry less energy when they are
one of a pair in an orbital than when they are unpaired. A molecule is only a free
radical if it possesses one or more unpaired electrons (Fig. 2.1).
Fig.2.1. Free Radical Molecule
AA is a fundamental property important for life. Many of the biological
functions, such as antimutagencity, anticarcinogencity, and antiaging, among others,
originate from this property3,4. Many of the natural antioxidants, especially
flavonoids, exhibit a wide range of biological effects, including antibacterial,
antiviral, anti-inflammatory, antiallergic, antithrombotic, and vasodilatory actions.
The AA of several plant materials has recently been reported5,6,7,8,9 & 10 however,
information on the relationship between AA and phenolic content and composition of
many food plants is not available.
2.2. ANTIOXIDANTS AND FREE RADICALS
Numerous antioxidants are plant-based and play a fundamental role in
protecting plants that are open to the elements such as sunlight and severe oxygen
stress. It has been suggested that antioxidants may amend cellular oxidative status and
prevent biologically significant molecules such as DNA, proteins, and membrane
27
lipids from oxidative damage and as a result lessen the risk of several chronic diseases
including cancer and cardiovascular disease11. A sufficient ingestion of natural
antioxidants in food is, therefore, of great consequence for the defense of
macromolecules against oxidative damage 12, 13. According to Stratil14 (2006), the
cells most frequently damaged by oxidative stress are unsaturated fatty acids in lipids,
cholesterol, different functional polypeptides, proteins and nucleic acids.
Some antioxidants provide increased protection with increasing concentration,
while others have optimal levels after which higher levels exert prooxidant effects15.
Moure16(2001) reported that there is a general trend for AA to increase with the
concentration of the antioxidant up to a certain limit, depending on the antioxidant
and the test used, most natural extracts and tests have shown a maximum AA at a
0.05% concentration. Various phenolic extracts from plant sources have been shown
to increase in AA with increasing concentration of the extract17, 18. Gordon19 (1992)
showed that IP of lard samples increased as concentration of hexane extracts of
powdered tanshen (Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge) increases. Onyeneho17 (1992) also
found that increasing the concentration of freeze dried extracts from the bran of
durum wheat led to increase AA showed by a decrease in PVs of soy oil. Similarly,
ethanolic extracts from red grape marc, peels and seed showed increased AA with
increased extract concentration18. Gamez-Meza20 (1999) showed that AA of extracts
of Thompson grape Bagasse increased as the concentration increased which was
shown by the increased stability of soybean oil. The increase in AA of phenolic
compounds due to increase in their concentration could be due to an increase in the
concentration of potential sites for radical scavenging. On the other hand, at high
concentrations, prooxidant effects could arise due to the involvement of the phenolic
compounds in initiation reactions (i.e., formation of radicals) 21.
28
2.3. EXTRACTION METHODS
Plant-derived antioxidants, especially, the phenolics have gained considerable
importance due to their potential health benefits. Epidemiological studies have shown
that consumption of plant foods containing antioxidants is beneficial to health because
it down-regulates many degenerative processes and can effectively lower the
incidence of cancer and cardio-vascular diseases22. Recovery of antioxidant
compounds from plant materials is typically accomplished through different
extraction techniques taking into account their chemistry and uneven distribution in
the plant matrix. For example, soluble phenolics are present in higher concentrations
in the outer tissues (epidermal and sub-epidermal layers) of fruits and grains than in
the inner tissues (mesocarp and pulp).
Solvent extraction is more frequently used for isolation of antioxidants; both
extraction yield and AA of extracts are strongly dependent on the solvent due to
different antioxidant potential of compounds with different polarity. Julkunen-Tiitto23
(1985) found a different behaviour in the extraction of different compounds and total
extractable polyphenols (TEP). Maximum total phenolic extraction yields were
attained with methanol, where as 50% acetone extracted more selectively
leucoanthocyanins and no significant effects were observed in the extraction of
glycosides. Also for extracts from burdock roots, water yielded the greatest amount of
extract and exhibited the strongest AA24. Aziza25 (1999) reported maximum AA from
cocoa by products in the methanol followed by mixtures of chloroform, ether and
dichloroethane or chloroform, methanol and dichloroethane. Also Przybylski26 (1998)
reported that the AA of buckwheat extracts varied with the polarity of the solvent,
those extracted with methanol being the most active.
29
Literature suggests limitations on reporting antioxidant capacity in cereals
based on the various extraction methods. First, the procedure used to extract
antioxidants may be incomplete. However, the extract yields and resulting antioxidant
activities of the plant materials are strongly dependent on the nature of extracting
solvent, due to the presence of different antioxidant compounds of varied chemical
characteristics and polarities that may or may not be soluble in a particular solvent23.
Polar solvents are frequently employed for the recovery of polyphenols from a
plant matrix. The most suitable of these solvents are (hot or cold) aqueous mixtures
containing methanol, ethanol, acetone, and ethyl acetate. Methanol and ethanol have
been extensively used to extract antioxidant compounds from various plants and
plant-based foods (fruits, vegetables etc.) such as plum, strawberry, pomegranate,
broccoli, rosemary, sage, sumac, rice bran, wheat grain and bran, mango kernel,
mango, citrus and many other fruit peels. In most of these experiments, the most
commonly employed solvent is absolute ethanol27, 28 or ethanol: water in different
proportions29, 30, 31&32 although the extraction of phenolic compounds could be
improved by using more polar solvents such as methanol33.
Some authors use methanol: water as an extraction solvent34, but the solvent
dilution is not regularly acidified, which has shown to improve the extraction35. The
solid-liquid extraction is a heterogeneous, multi component operation involving the
non-steady transfer of solutes from a solid to a fluid. Vegetable materials include
different solutes that can be extracted simultaneously at different rates depending on
the location (outer surface, pores, vacuoles, etc.) and their partition coefficients36.
30
Stability of different extracts from same material was dependent on extracting
solvent used for solubilization and removal of polyphenolic compounds. Methanol
extracts from cocoa by-products were stable up to 500C where as other extracts were
less stable25. Bonoli37 (2004) reported that maximum phenolic compounds were
obtained from barley flour with mixtures of ethanol and acetone. Similarly, aqueous
methanol was found to be more effective in recovering highest amounts of phenolic
compounds from rice bran and Moringa oleifera leaves38. Anwar39 (2003) extracted
antioxidant compounds from various plant materials including rice bran, wheat bran,
oat grouts and hull, coffee beans, citrus peel and guava leaves using aqueous 80%
methanol (methanol: water, 80:20 v/v). A study conducted by Peschel40 (2006) on
some fruits and vegetable by-products showed that apple, strawberry, cucumber,
chicory showed highest phenolic content in methanol extract than water, ethanol,
acetone and hexane. It was found that methanol extract was also having high AA
when tested by superoxide anion scavenging activity, FTC, DPPH and Rancimat
methods40.
The AA also depends on the type and polarity of the extracting solvent, the
isolation procedures, purity of active compounds, as well as the test system and
substrate to be protected by the antioxidant41. It has been suggested that the
determining factor for the AA is the lipophilic nature of the molecules and the affinity
of the antioxidant for the lipid42, 43. A close dependency on the AA of phenolic
acids44 has been reported for phenolic compounds, and even the recommended
concentration of synthetic antioxidants has been indicated for some tests45. The
antioxidant potential of a compound is different according to different antioxidant
assays or, for the same assay when the polarity of the medium differs, since the
interaction of the antioxidant with other compounds play an important role in the
31
activity, dramatic difference in the relative antioxidant potential of model compounds
were observed when one model compound is strongly antioxidant with one method
and prooxidant with another44. A phenomenon known as “polar paradox’ has been
repeatedly reported; hydrophilic antioxidant are more effective than lipophilic
antioxidants in bulk oil, whereas lipophilic antioxidants present greater activity in
emulsions.
2.4. TOTAL PHENOLIC CONTENT (TPC)
It is highly impractical to quantify all of the compounds in plants that exhibit
antioxidant activities; a variety of methods have been developed to quantify total
antioxidant capacity of plant extracts46.
Most natural antioxidants are multifunctional in complex heterogeneous foods;
their activity cannot be assessed by any one method47, 48. Measurement of TPC
quantifies the total concentration of phenolic hydroxyl groups present in an extract
being assayed, regardless of the specific molecules in which the hydroxyl groups
occur49. The assays used to measure total phenols do not, therefore, provide
information on the particular phenolic compounds present in a sample. Some common
methods for the measurement of total phenols included the colorimetric Prussian
Blue, Folin-Denis ferric ammonium citrate or FC methods.
The FC method, however, appears to be the popular method widely used for
the determination of total phenols. The method is based on the reducing power of
hydroxyl groups, which react with the FC phenol reagent (an oxidizing agent
comprised of heteropolyphosphotungstate-molybdate) under basic conditions to form
chromogens that can be detected spectrophotometrically at 760 nm. The reagent is
32
more sensitive to reduction by phenolics, and the addition of lithium sulphate to the
reagent makes it less prone to precipitation and interference by non-phenolics.
The FC method has been used for many years as a means to determine total
phenolics in natural products50. Many studies show the recommended reference
standard (gallic acid) being replaced with tannic acid equivalents, caffeic equivalents,
vanillic acid equivalents and catechin equivalents, among others. Phenolic compounds
can be found in flavonoids, phenolic acids, hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives and
lignans.
2.5. ANTIOXIDANT CAPACITY ASSAYS
It is of great interest to the general public, medical and nutritional experts, and
health and food science researchers to know the antioxidant capacity and constituents
in the foods we consume. Due to the complexity of the composition of foods,
separating each antioxidant compound and studying it individually is costly and
inefficient, notwithstanding the possible synergistic interactions among the
antioxidant compounds in a food mixture. A total antioxidant capacity assay using
only one chemical reaction seems to be rather un-realistic and not easy to rely, yet,
there are numerous published methods claiming to measure total antioxidant capacity
in vitro. In fact, phenols are presumed to be responsible for the beneficial effects
derived from the consumption of whole grains, fruits, and vegetables. Phenolic
compounds have strong in vitro and in vivo AAs associated with their ability to
scavenge free radicals, break radical chain reactions, and chelate metals. Moreover,
high phenol consumption has been correlated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular
diseases and certain cancers37.
33
Several methods have been described to assess AA of compounds both in vitro
and in vivo, such as the measurement of prevention of oxidative damage to
biomolecules such as lipids or DNA and methods assessing radical scavenging
ability51. The following in vitro methods have been described: Ferricthiocyanate
(FTC) method52, β-carotene-linoleate model system 53,19 and free radical scavenging
using 2,2-diphenyl-1 picrylhydrazyl (DPPH)42.
No single assay will accurately reflect all of the radical foundations or all
antioxidants in a mixed or complex system and it must be appreciated at the outset
that there are no simple universal methods by which antioxidant capacity can be
measured accurately and quantitatively50; also too many analytical methods result in
inconsistent results, inappropriate application and interpretation of assays and
improper specifications of antioxidant capacities. There are two reaction mechanisms
in which antioxidants can deactivate radicals. The first of these methods is the single
electron transfer (SET) assay which detects the ability of a potential antioxidant to
transfer one electron to reduce any compound, including metals, carbonyls and
radicals54.
According to Prior50 (2005), SET reactions are usually slow and can require a
lengthy time to reach completion, so the antioxidant capacity calculations are based
on per cent decrease in product rather than kinetics. The second method is the
hydrogen atom transfer (HAT), which measures the antioxidant’s ability to quench
free radicals by hydrogen donation. HAT reactions are solvent and pH independent
and are usually quite rapid. The presence of reducing agents, including metals, is a
complication in HAT assays and can lead to erroneously high apparent reactivity50.
There are methods utilizing both HAT and SET mechanisms. The TEAC and DPPH
34
assays are usually classified as SET reactions, however, these two indicator radicals
in fact may be neutralized either by direct reduction via electron transfers or by
radical quenching via HAT55.
2.5.1. 2, 2,-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl Activity
DPPH• is one of a few stable and commercially available organic nitrogen
radicals bearing no similarity to the highly reactive and transient peroxyl radicals
involved in various oxidative reactions in vivo56,57. This assay is based on the
measurement of the reducing ability of antioxidants towards DPPH•. The ability can
be evaluated by electron spin resonance or by measuring the decrease of its
absorbance. The measurement of the loss of DPPH color at 515 nm following the
reaction with test compounds is what the antioxidant assays are based on Prior50
(2005). DPPH radical, with a deep violet color, receives a hydrogen atom from the
antioxidant and is converted to a colorless molecule. Using this reagent, the free
radical scavenging ability of the antioxidant can be determined by spectrophotometric
methods. Yen and Duh(1994)58, Chen and Ho (1995)59 have reported that inhibition of
free radical formation by different antioxidants can be measured using very stable free
radicals such as 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl. Using the DPPH assay has its
advantages. It is simple, rapid and needs only a UV vis spectrophotometer to carry out
the experiment.
2.5.2. Reducing Power (RP)
RP increases according to the increase in absorbance. As more Fe3+ are
reduced to the ferrous form or when more electrons are donated by antioxidant
components; the colour of Perl’s Prussian blue will be darker, resulting in an
increased absorbance reading60. Reductants also react with certain precursors of
35
peroxides, thus preventing the formation of peroxide61. The RP is found to be
dependent on extract concentration. Yen (1995) also reported that RP of tea extracts
increased markedly with increasing extract concentration62.
2.5.3. Ferric Thiocyanate (FTC) Capacity
Real food Systems generally consists of multiple phases in which lipid and
water co exists with some emulsifier. Hence an antioxidant assay using a
heterogenous systems such as oil-in water emulsion is one of the model systems for
such evaluation, satisfying above conditions. The linoleic acid emulsion
system/thiocyanate method has been used here for evaluation under above
conditions63. During peroxidation in an incubator the absorbance values increased
owing to oxidation products, which react to form ferric thiocyanate the colour of red
blood64. Antioxidants can hinder the oxidation and consequently, the increase in
absorbance will be less.
2.5.4. β-carotene bleaching assay
Mechanism of bleaching of β-carotene is a free radical mediated phenomenon
resulting from hydroperoxides formed from linoleic acid. β-carotene, in this model
system undergoes rapid discolouration in the absence of an antioxidant. The linoleic
acid free radical formed upon the abstraction of a hydrogen atom from one of its
diallylic methylene groups attacks the highly unsaturated β-carotene molecule and
looses its chromophore and characteristic orange colour62.
2.6. LIPID OXIDATION
Lipid oxidation is a general term used to describe a complex sequence of
chemical interactions between unsaturated fatty acyl groups in lipids with active
36
oxygen species65. The unsaturated fatty acids on triacylglycerols and phospholipids
have low volatility and do not directly contribute to the aroma of foods. However,
these fatty acids will decompose during lipid oxidation to form small, volatile
molecules that produce the off-aromas associated with oxidative rancidity. These
volatile compounds are detrimental to food quality except in the case of food products
such as fried foods, dried cereal, and cheeses, where small amounts of these volatile
compounds are important in their flavour profile.
The oxidative deterioration of fats and oils in foods is responsible for rancid
odours and flavours, with a consequent decrease in nutritional quality and safety
caused by the formation of secondary, potentially toxic, compounds. The addition of
antioxidants is required to preserve flavor and colour and to avoid vitamin
destruction. The mechanisms of lipid oxidation in a particular food depend on the
nature of the reactive species present and their physico-chemical environment66.
Lipid oxidation reactions are dependent on the chemical reactivity of
numerous components including reactive oxygen species, prooxidants, and
antioxidants. However, research over the past few decades has shown that the
physical properties of food systems are extremely important to the chemistry of lipid
oxidation67, 68.
Understanding how the physical nature of bulk oils impacts lipid oxidation
reactions could lead to the development of new antioxidant technologies and to the
more efficient use of existing antioxidant ingredients. For example, if association
colloids are found to be the major site of oxidation reactions in bulk oils, then altering
these structures or more efficiently delivering antioxidants to the site of oxidation
37
could significantly improve the oxidative stability of oils. Thus, increasing the
understanding of oxidative mechanisms in oils could increase the use of nutritionally
beneficial polyunsaturated lipids in foods.
2.6.1. Mechanism of Lipid Oxidation
Theoretically, lipid oxidation is a free radical chain reaction between
unsaturated fats and oxygen that can occur in an autocatalytic manner. However, lipid
oxidation in many food systems is accelerated by prooxidants such as transition metal
ions, photosensitizers, UV light, and certain enzymes69. The overall mechanism of
lipid oxidation involves three stages:
1. initiation - the formation of free radicals
2. propagation - the free-radical chain reactions and
3. termination - the formation of nonradical products 69,65
A simple scheme for the free radical mechanism can be summarized as
follows65
In the initiation step, a fatty acid radical known as the alkyl radical (L•) is
formed by abstraction of a hydrogen from a fatty acid in the presence of an initiator
(In•). Once the alkyl radical forms, the free radical can delocalize over the double
bond system resulting in double bond shifting and in the case of polyunsaturated fatty
acids, formation of conjugated double bonds. In bulk oils, the ease of formation of
alkyl radicals in fatty acids increases with increasing unsaturation.
The first step of propagation involves the addition of oxygen to the alkyl
radical resulting in the formation of peroxyl radical (LOO•), which has a higher
38
energy than the alkyl radical. Thus, the peroxyl radical can abstract hydrogen from
another unsaturated fatty acid and produce lipid hydro peroxide (LOOH) and a new
alkyl radical. The interaction of two free radicals to form non-radical species will
terminate the process. This step is sometimes not very important in many foods as
initiation and propagation since the food is already rancid before significant
termination reactions take place. An exception is in the low oxygen environment of
frying oils where the termination reaction can occur between alkyl radicals to form
fatty acid dimers65.
2.6.2. Lipid Oxidation Decomposition Products
Rancidity in food occurs when unsaturated fatty acids decompose into volatile
compounds. These volatile oxidation products are produced from the decomposition
of fatty acid hydroperoxides41. The homolytic cleavage of hydroperoxides (LOOH)
between these two oxygen molecules is the most likely hydroperoxide decomposition
pathway. This reaction yields an alkoxyl (LO•) and a hydroxyl radical (•OH). The
alkoxyl radical (LO•), which is more energetic than either the alkyl (L•) or peroxyl
radical (LOO•), can enter into a number of different reaction pathways. Alkoxyl
radicals can attack another unsaturated fatty acid, a pentadiene group within the same
fatty acid or the covalent bonds adjacent to the alkoxyl radical. This last reaction is
known as β-scission reaction and is important to food quality as it can cause fatty
acids to decompose into low molecular weight, volatile compounds that cause
rancidity.
2.6.3. Antioxidants (oxidation inhibitors)
Incorporation of antioxidants into foods is one of the most effective methods
of retarding lipid oxidation. However, many factors can impact the activity of
39
antioxidants with some antioxidants retarding lipid oxidation under certain conditions
but promoting lipid oxidation under other conditions70. Several degradation reactions,
which may occur on heating or during long term storage, deteriorate fats and oils and
the lipid constituents of foods.
Oxidation reactions and the decomposition of oxidation products are the main
processes which result in decreased nutritional value and sensory quality71. Research
has implicated oxidative and free-radical-mediated reactions in degenerative
processes related to ageing and diseases such as cancer, coronary heart disease and
neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's disease72.
The prevention or retardation of these oxidation processes is essential for the
food producer and almost everyone involved in the entire food chain from “farm to
fork”. Various methodologies may be employed to inhibit oxidization, including
prevention of oxygen access, use of lower temperature, inactivation of enzymes
catalyzing oxidation, reduction of oxygen pressure and the use of suitable
packaging73. Another common method of protection against oxidation is to use
specific additives which inhibit or retard oxidation. These oxidation inhibitors are
generally known as antioxidants.
Antioxidants can be classified according to their mechanisms of action as
either primary or secondary antioxidants. However, some substances have more than
one mechanism of antioxidant activity and are referred to as multiple-function
antioxidants.
40
2.6.4. Primary Antioxidants
Primary or chain-breaking antioxidants retard lipid oxidation by interfering
with chain propagation, initiation, reactions by accepting free radicals and forming
stable free radicals that do not further promote initiation or propagation reactions66.
For a primary antioxidant to be effective it must inactivate free radicals before they
can attack unsaturated fatty acids. It is believed that free radical scavenging
antioxidants interact mainly with peroxyl radicals (LOO•).
Although, there are many synthetic free radical scavenging antioxidants
(BHA, BHT, PG and TBHQ), that are efficient and relatively cheap these synthetic
compounds are “label unfriendly” additives. Special attention has been given to the
use of natural free radical scavengers due to the worldwide trend to avoid or minimize
the use of synthetic food additives. Many natural free radical scavengers such as
catechins (catechin, epicatechin, epigallocatechin, epicatechin gallate,
epigallocatechin gallate) also have health benefits as inhibitors of biologically harmful
oxidation reactions in the body75, 76, &77. Therefore, a better understanding of the
properties of natural free radical scavengers could lead to the development of food
additives that could both prevent oxidative deterioration of foods while also providing
health benefits. Taking advantage of rancidity prevention and health promoting
properties of natural free radical scavengers could help overcome their limitation in
effectiveness, price, associated flavours and colours.
2.6.5. Secondary Antioxidants
Secondary antioxidants prevent the formation of free radicals in the initiation
step by scavenging oxygen, e.g. ascorbic acid or chelating metal ions, e.g. citric acid
and flavonoids78. Some phenolic antioxidants have synergistic effects with ascorbic
41
and citric acids61. Ascorbic acid is primarily an effective oxygen scavenger21, but
when used in combination with tocopherol gives rise to a stronger synergistic
antioxidant effect. The synergistic effect of ascorbic acid with tocopherol is believed
to be due to the ability of ascorbic acid to regenerate tocopherol by reducing the
tocopheroxyl radical resulting from the primary antioxidant effect of the tocopherol78.
2.6.6. Chelators
Transition metals are prooxidants capable of accelerating lipid oxidation
reactions. Chelators are a group of secondary antioxidants that can bind and thus
inactivate or reduce the activity of prooxidant metals. The most common food
chelators are citric acid (and its lipophilic, mono glyceride ester), phosphoric acid
(and its polyphosphate derivatives), and ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA). It
should be noted that some chelators can be ineffective when used alone but can
greatly enhance the action of phenolic free radical scavengers when used in
combination. In addition, some chelators may increase oxidative reaction under
certain conditions by increasing metal solubility or altering the redox potential of the
metal 79, 80 For instance, the anti oxidative properties of EDTA is determined by its
concentration in relation to prooxidant metals, and can act as a prooxidant when the
ratio of EDTA to iron is less than 1, and an antioxidant when the ratio is equal or
greater than 180.
2.6.7. Oxygen Scavengers and Reducing Agents
Oxygen is a substrate in lipid oxidation reactions. Ascorbic acid, ascorbyl
palmitate, erythorbic acid, sodium erythorbate, and sulfites are able to scavenge
oxygen and act as reductants. Ascorbic acid and sulfites retard lipid oxidation by
reacting directly with oxygen to eliminate it from food. In recent years, oxygen
42
scavengers have been directly incorporated into packaging materials, however, these
technologies are still too expensive for most food packaging applications.
2.6.8. Singlet Oxygen Quenchers
Singlet oxygen (1O2) is an excited state of oxygen that can be formed by
enzymatic reactions in biological systems or in the presence of a photosensitizer, light
and triplet oxygen. Singlet oxygen can be inactivated through both chemical and
physical quenching pathways by compounds such as tocopherols, carotenoids
(including β-carotene, lycopene, and lutein), polyphenols (including catechins, and
flavonoids), amino acids, peptides, proteins, urate, and ascorbate79.
2.6.9. Interactions between Antioxidants and Multiple Antioxidant Functions
It has been reported that when two antioxidants are used together, a synergistic
or additive effect can be observed. Vitamin E and vitamin C are a well-known
example of a synergistic system. Vitamin E acts as a lipid soluble chain-breaking
antioxidant and vitamin C reduces the tocopherol radical back to its original state so
that it can continue to inactivate free radicals in the lipid phase. If a chain-breaking
and a secondary antioxidant are mixed, both initiation and propagation are
suppressed. Thus, a combination of chelators and free radical scavenging antioxidants
are often very effective. For instance, chelating antioxidants such as citric or other
acids can enhance the activity of phenolic antioxidants. A synergistic relationship
between ascorbic acid and phosphates in retarding lipid oxidation was also observed
in meat.
Antioxidants can also have multiple functions such as free radical scavenging
and metal chelation. Examples include propyl gallate (PG), proteins81 and
43
proanthocyanidins82. Ascorbic acid is also a multifunctional antioxidant in food
systems. It can quench singlet oxygen, reduce free radicals and antioxidant radicals,
and remove molecular oxygen in the presence of metal ions 83.
The antioxidant principles were characterized as phenolic compounds and
phospholipids84. The phenolics were assumed to be mainly gallic acids and gallates.
In another study, gallotannins and condensed tannin-related polyphenols were
reported in mango kernels85. Ethanolic extracts of mango kernels displayed a broad
antimicrobial spectrum and were more effective against Gram-positive than against
Gram-negative bacteria. Their active component was shown to be a polyphenolic-type
structure; however, its exact nature still remains to be elucidated86.
2.7. NATURAL ANTIOXIDANTS
2.7.1. Natural versus synthetic antioxidants
Plants contain a variety of substances called “Phytochemicals” that owe to
naturally occurring components present in plants. The phytochemical preparations in
preventing lipid oxidation have tremendous potential for extending shelf life of food
products. Several research groups around the world have succeeded in finding and
identifying natural antioxidants from herbs and spices using different model
systems87.
Increased intake of dietary antioxidants may help to maintain an adequate
antioxidant status, defined as the balance between antioxidants and oxidants in living
organisms88. Antioxidants are widely used in the manufacture, packaging and storage
of lipid-containing foods. Much interest has developed during the last few decades in
naturally occurring antioxidants because of the adverse attention received by synthetic
44
antioxidants, and also the worldwide trend to avoid or minimize the use of artificial
food additives89. Halliwell90 (1989) defined an antioxidant as any substance that when
present at low concentrations compared to those of an oxidizable substrate
significantly delays or prevents oxidation of that substrate.
The primary purpose of adding antioxidants to lipids is to delay the onset of
oxidation and accumulation of oxidative products91. Antioxidants may delay or inhibit
oxidation, but cannot improve the quality of an already oxidized product92.
Antioxidants may act either as primary (chain breaking) or as secondary (preventive)
antioxidants. Some phenolic antioxidants are classified as synergists due to their
prominent effectiveness in the presence of other non-phenolic substances such as
citric acid.
Hundreds of materials, both synthetic and of natural origin, have been
developed as antioxidants for food preservation, but only BHA and BHT as synthetic
antioxidants and tocopherols as natural ones are practically used. Synthetic
antioxidants such as BHT, BHA, TBHQ and PG are currently widely used in the food
industry to increase the oxidative stability of fats and oils 93, 94. However, the most
commonly used synthetic antioxidants, BHA, BHT, PG and TBHQ are faced
resistance in recent times due to accumulating evidence that they could be toxic,
carcinogenic or mutagenic96, 97, 98, 99 and also suspected of causing liver damage.
There has been a growing interest in the exploration of natural antioxidants as food
additives due to these safety concerns.
On the other hand, tocopherols are widely used as safe natural antioxidants,
but they are not as effective as synthetic antioxidants and the manufacturing cost is
45
high. These circumstances stimulated the isolation of new antioxidants from natural
sources, especially from plant materials. They are added to an extensive variety of
foods in order to prevent or retard oxidation. Since continued use of chemical
antioxidants such as BHA and BHT has been reported to cause teratogenic and
carcinogenic effects in small animals and primates, commonly used vegetable leaves
which are rich in antioxidants would probably prove safe to the health of the
consumers.
Shi99 (2001) stated that natural antioxidants are safer, more potent and more
efficient than synthetic antioxidants. For example, ∝-tocopherol (the most active form
of vitamin E) is more effective than synthetic racemic ∝-tocopherol, primarily
because ∝-tocopherol transfer protein selectively recognizes natural ∝- tocopherol. In
addition, the possible activity of synthetic antioxidants as promoters of carcinogenesis
has become a concern. Therefore, replacing synthetic antioxidants with natural
alternatives, or simply replacing all synthetic food additives with natural choices, has
attracted great interest over the past two decades100.
2.7.2. Plants as sources of antioxidants
Antioxidant properties of common spices and herbs were systematically
investigated in the 1950s. Since then, numerous studies have been devoted to
vegetable sources, not only for their possible utilization as antioxidative extracts but
also to look for new, naturally efficient antioxidants. Several antioxidants have been
characterized from plant leaves and some products or extracts proved to be as good as
the synthetic BHA and BHT101.
46
Natural antioxidants may be found in any plant part. Fruits, vegetables, spices,
nuts, seeds, leaves, roots and barks have been considered as potential sources of
natural antioxidants102. Antioxidants in flaxseed, sunflower, soybean, cottonseed and
canola typify those found in oilseeds. The majority of natural antioxidants are
phenolic compounds, and the most important groups of natural antioxidants are the
tocopherols, flavonoids and phenolic acids that are common to all plant sources103.
Naturally occurring antioxidants are presumed safe since they are found in
food that has been used by man for centuries. The natural antioxidants in food may
also be beneficial because there is evidence that they prevent cancer development and
that they inhibit oxidative reactions in the body system.
Phenolic compounds have both primary and secondary antioxidant activities
by acting both as chain breaking antioxidants by donating hydrogen atoms to lipid
radicals (radical scavenging) or by preventing initiation reactions by such means as
chelating metals104,105,106. Both the chain breaking (radical scavenging) and metal
chelating properties are known to be possible due to the structural features of the
phenolic compounds.
Phenolic extracts from several plant sources have been shown to have
antioxidant activities. These include potato peels107, tomatoes 108, garlic and ginger109,
sunflower seed, wheat germ, fruits, vegetables and medicinal plants110, rape seed111,
tea91, sage and thyme67, plums112, grape marc26, red clove113 and tree spinach46.
Thompson grape Bagasse is byproduct with high phenolic compounds and is a source
of natural antioxidant20. Phenolic compounds from sorghum such as condensed
47
tannin114 flavones (such as naringen) 115 and anthocyanins116 have also been reported
to possess AA.
2.7.3. Factors affecting AA of phenolic compounds
Polymeric polyphenols are more potent antioxidants than simple monomeric
phenolics; Hagerman114 (1998) demonstrated the higher antioxidant ability of
condensed and hydrolysable tannins at quenching peroxyl radicals over simple
phenols; Yamaguchi82 (1999) observed that the higher the polymerization degree of
flavanols, the stronger the superoxide-scavenging activity. A similar effect was
reported for the capacity to inhibit the O2 radical, which increased with the degree of
procycanidin polymerization117 or for the stronger inhibition of lipid peroxidation by
dimers of ferulic than by ferulic acid118. As a general trend, improved stabilization of
the phenoxyl radical is desirable, but the lipohilic nature of the molecules and the
affinity of the antioxidant for the lipids could be determinant43. Also the anti
lipoperoxidant effect depends on the number and position of hydroxyl and methoxyl
groups in the benzene ring and on the possibility of electron delocalization in the
double bonds118. The presence of sugar substituent of flavonols from different
vegetables has been demonstrated to significantly affect AA of flavonols119, 120.
Methoxylation of hydroxyl groups (introduction of a –OCH3 group into the
phenolic structure, replacing the OH group) decreases AA. This reduction in the AA
may be attributed to differences in redox potential of the OH groups and the
substituted groups (such as the –OCH3 group) on the phenyl ring. Hydroxyl groups
have lower redox potential, which makes them good electron-donating groups (i.e.
good reducing agents), hence increasing the efficacy of phenolic antioxidants.
Substituted groups such as-OCH3, however, increase the redox potential of phenols,
48
hence reducing their antioxidant potential due to a reduction in their ability to donate
electrons121.
Phenolic compounds, flavonoids in particular, are able to chelate metals due to
the presence of hydroxyl groups attached to their ring structures104, 105 & 106. Phenolic
compounds are compartmentalized in the cell matrix, but once the cell matrix is
broken during the extraction of phenolic compounds, the compounds become prone to
degradation. It has been shown that temperature123, light124, oxygen125, enzymes126
and pH127 affect stability of phenolic compounds. The changes that occur may in turn
affect the antioxidant properties of the phenolic compounds.
Phenolic compounds can be degraded through enzymatic or chemical
oxidation that may occur during the extraction process. Plant tissues contain the
enzyme polyphenol oxidase, which when in contact with phenolic compounds in the
presence of oxygen as the plant tissues disintegrate, may catalyze the oxidation of the
phenols to quinines126. The phenolic compounds can also be oxidized non-
enzymatically in which the phenol group can be transformed into a quinine upon
exposure to air. The quinones formed can subsequently undergo rapid non-enzymatic
polymerization that would change the original nature of the phenolic compounds,
hence causing changes in its chemical properties. For instance, the disintegration of
plant tissues in potatoes releases polyphenol oxidase, which reacts with phenolic
compounds in the presence of oxygen resulting in the formation of polymerized
brown compounds (enzymatic browning).
Several isolated plant constituents as well as crude extracts of vegetables and
fruits have been recognized to possess beneficial effects against free radicals in
49
biological systems as antioxidants. The beneficial effect of fruits and vegetables can
be attributed to the antioxidant capacity of polyphenols present in them. Green leafy
vegetables form a rich source of dietary fibres, nutraceuticals and vitamins, eg
carotene (a precursor of vitamin A), vitamin C, riboflavin, folic acid and minerals, eg
calcium, iron and phosphorous128, 129. Epidemiological studies have shown that many
phytonutrients of fruits and vegetables might protect the human body against damage
by reactive oxygen species. The consumption of natural antioxidant phytochemicals
was reported to have potential health benefits130. In recent years, there has been a
considerable interest in finding natural antioxidants from plant materials. The
antioxidant phytochemicals from plants, particularly flavonoids and other
polyphenols, have been reported to inhibit the propagation of free radical reactions, to
protect the human body from disease and to retard lipid oxidative rancidity. In
addition, the use of synthetic antioxidants has been questioned because of their
toxicity131. Therefore, there have been numerous researches on these bio resources to
seek for potential natural and possibly economic and effective antioxidants to replace
the synthetic ones132.
Since fruits and leafy vegetables are a rich source of a number of
micronutrients and phytochemicals having antioxidant properties, these are protective
against chronic degenerative health disorders. The levels of antioxidants and
micronutrients may vary depending upon the type of fruit or vegetable, the variety and
agro-climatic conditions. Micronutrient content and antioxidant capacity are affected
by food processing and cooking, indicating the need for data on locally consumed
cooked preparations133.
50
The consumption of fruits and vegetables40 containing antioxidants has been
found to offer protection against diseases. Dietary antioxidants can augment cellular
defenses and help to prevent oxidative damage to cellular components90. Besides
playing an important role in physiological systems, antioxidants have been used in
food industry to prolong the shelf life of foods, especially those rich in
polyunsaturated fats. These components in food are readily oxidized by molecular
oxygen and are major cause of oxidative deterioration, nutritional losses, off flavour
development and discoloration. The search for antioxidants from natural sources has
received much attention and efforts have been put into identify compounds that can
act as suitable antioxidants to replace synthetic ones. In addition, these naturally
occurring antioxidants can be formulated as functional foods and nutraceuticals that
can help to prevent from oxidative damage occurring in the body.
Dietary antioxidants protect against free radicals such as reactive oxygen
species in the human body. Free radicals can cause damage to cellular bio-molecules
such as nucleic acids, enzymes, proteins, lipids and carbohydrates and consequently
may adversely affect immune functions. Fruits and vegetables are low in calories but
they provide significant contributions in the protection of health from harmful effects
of reactive oxygen species. They are good sources of natural antioxidants such as
vitamins, carotenoids and phenols. Several epidemiological studies have shown a
negative association between the intake of fruits, vegetables and certain diseases such
as cancer, cardiovascular disease, cataracts and so on134.
The key structural features that have been shown to enable phenolic
compounds exert RSA are as follows:
51
(i) The number of phenolic hydroxyl groups on the phenolic compound
molecule. Studies have shown that generally, the more the number of
hydroxyl groups on a phenolic structure, the higher the radical scavenging
capacity135, 136,137. More hydroxyl groups on a phenolic compound provide
more sites for radical scavenging, hence the increased AA of compounds with
multiple hydroxyl groups.
(ii) Presence of hydroxyl groups on carbon number 3 and 4 in the B ring (3’, 4’-
dihydroxyl catechol configuration) 138, 122. The strong RSA by the 3, 4’-
dihydroxyl group in the B ring is due to its ability to provide highly stable
phenoxyl radicals after the donation of a hydrogen atom139.
Tocopherols are considered the best known and most widely used
antioxidants140. They are classified into two groups, namely tocopherols and
tocotrienols. There are four isomers (∝-, β-, γ - and δ-) in each group, for a total of
eight tocopherol isomers. Tocopherols exist in nearly all parts of plants. Flavonoids
represent a large group of phenolics that occur naturally in plants and are found in
fruits, vegetables, grains, barks, roots, stems, flowers, tea and wine141. They are
characterized by the carbon skeleton C6–C3–C6. The basic structure of these
compounds consists of two aromatic rings linked by a three carbon aliphatic chain.
Several classes of flavonoids are delineated on the basis of their molecular structure,
but the four main groups that occur in plant tissues are flavones, flavanones, catechins
and anthocyanins141.
Phenolic acids and their derivatives occur widely in the plant kingdom, e.g.,
legumes, cereals, fruits and plant products such as tea, cider, oil, wine, beverages and
medicinal plants142. Phenolic acids can be found in free and conjugated forms in
52
cereals103. They are present in highest concentration in the aleurone layer of grains,
but are also found in the embryo and seed coat. The level of phenolics in plant sources
also depends on such factors as cultivation techniques, cultivar, growing conditions,
ripening process, processing and storage conditions, as well as stress conditions such
as UV radiation, infection by pathogens and parasites, wounding, air pollution and
exposure to extreme temperatures103.
2.7.4. Recent advances in research on natural antioxidants
Recently, research on phytochemicals and their effects on human health have
been intensively studied. In particular, research has focused on a search for
antioxidants, from vegetables, fruits, leaves, tea, spices and medicinal herbs. Since
fruits and leafy vegetables are a rich source of a number of micronutrients and
phytochemicals having antioxidant properties, these are protective against chronic
degenerative health disorders. Several studies have analysed the antioxidant potential
of a wide variety of vegetables and particularly of cocoa beans143, potato144, tomato8,
spinach145, legumes such as Phaseolus vulgaris146 or vegetable such as paprika147. The
levels of antioxidants and micronutrients may vary depending upon the type of fruit or
vegetable, the variety and agro-climatic conditions. Both natural extracts and
commercial products from garlic and ginger148, rosemary149, dietary supplements150,
drinks151, seashore plants152 and seaweeds153 were evaluated for AA.
A number of studies deal with the AA of extracts from herbs, medicinal plants
and spices. Other potential vegetable sources, such as trees, have been evaluated for
antioxidant compounds154. Among the different parts of the plants, leaves deserve
special attention e.g., those from green barley155 or avocado156. Seeds are another
source of antioxidants as reported for tamarind 157, canola158, sesame159, evening
53
prime rose160, buckwheat, sunflower161. Also in cereals162 as in recent study on corn
kernel163, AA was detected.
Hulls contain compounds with antioxidant activity 164 .Active compounds were
detected in hulls from peanut165, mung bean166 and buck wheat167. During the
extraction of oil from oilseeds, the antioxidant compounds present in the hulls could
be incorporated in the oil, as reported for peanut oil extracted from coated seeds,
which contained higher oxidative stability than the oil from dehulled seeds. Baublis162
(2000) found higher inhibition of iron accelerated oxidation of phosphotidylcholine
liposomes for water soluble from high bran wheat varieties than from refined wheat.
The outer layers usually contain a greater amount of polyphenolic compounds, as
expected from their protective function in the plants. Agricultural and industrial
residues are attractive sources of natural antioxidants. Potato peel waste101, skin of
olive168 fruits, olive mill waste waters169, grape seeds170 and grape pomace171 have
been studied as cheap sources of antioxidants and recently increased AA in rat
plasma after oral administration of grape seed extracts was reported. Identification of
polyphenolic compounds from apple pomace172, grape pomace171, citrus seeds and
peels173, carrot pulp waste174, old tea leaves 175, cocoa byproducts25, non volatile
residue from orange essential oil176 and soybean molasses177 has also been reported.
Spent ground coffee oil from the residue from the production of instant coffee was
used to obtain an antioxidant product useful for food preservation and for aroma
stabilization, the AA being due to the 5-hydroxytryptamide carboxylic acids178.
Maillard reaction products were also reported as antioxidant agents. The derivation of
natural products with AA from brewing seeds, grains and or germs has been claimed
by Niwa179 (1991).
54
Among all, mango (Mangifera indica L.) is one of the most important tropical
fruits worldwide in terms of production and consumer acceptance180. It is a rich
source of antioxidants181, 182 including ascorbic acid183, carotenoids184 and phenolic
compounds185, 186, 187. Flavonol and xanthone glycosides as well as galactonnins and
benzophenone derivatives, have been demonstrated to be present mainly in the peels
and seeds and pronounced inter-varietal differences have been observed in terms of
the quantitative composition of these compounds 185,186,188. Mango peels were also
reported to be a good source of dietary fiber containing high amounts of extractable
polyphenolics189. This appreciable content was reflected by high in vitro AA190.
However, since polyphenolics were determined by the FC assay, no conclusions could
be drawn as to their chemical structures. Furthermore, owing to their lack of
selectivity, spectrophotometric methods tend to over-estimate the phenolic content191.
Raw mango has highest phenols compared to ripe whereas carotenoid content was
high in ripe mangoes192. The presence of a broad pattern of phenolic compounds
especially of flavonol glycoside, in mango puree concentrate was demonstrated by
HPLC with diode array and mass spectrometric detection187. It was hypothesized that
these phenolics may partly originate from the peel since mango puree is prepared both
from peeled and unpeeled fruits. Preliminary investigations on peel phenolics of
different mango cultivars confirmed this assumption. Antioxidant compounds
associated with some types of dietary fibers may be responsible in part for the
beneficial effects on health of high dietary fiber diets. AA of a high dietary fibre
mango peel product and of some commercial samples was determined by the FTC
colorimetric method. All Bran, Quaker Oats, lemon and apple fiber did not exhibit
any antioxidant capacity. The production of high dietary fibre products with bioactive
55
compounds could be useful for the food industry and AA may be a new property to
consider in the quality evaluation of these ingredients.
The presence of phenolic compounds in the human diet is associated with
protective effects against some chronic-degenerative diseases related to oxidative
stress193. Flavonols have potent antioxidant194, anticarcinogenic195 and antiatherogenic
activities196. Mangiferin, a xanthone-C-glycoside, has attracted intense interest for its
variety of pharmacological properties, including antioxidant197, antitumor and
antiviral198.
A severe problem associated with the mango processing industry is the
production of large quantities of waste and by-products, in particular peels and seeds.
The main reason to exploit the potential use of the mango peel and kernel are the
environmental consequence caused by the generation of agro-industrial residue by
factories making the juice. These waste and by-products have been shown to
constitute a rich source of polyphenolics which could be used as neutraceuticals and
/or natural antioxidants to replace some synthetic food additive199 & 200 and as cancer-
preventing agents.
Mango kernels were extracted with different organic solvents and phenolics
and phospholipids were studied for AA separately in buffalo ghee in comparison with
BHA at 0.02%. Phenolics and phospholipids showed better activity when added
jointly. PV was tested for stored oil which showed low PV in joint addition84. The
antioxidant effect of mango peel and kernel was due to their high content of
polyphenols, sesquiterpenoids, phytosterols and microelements like selenium, copper
56
and zinc 200,201, however little is known about AA and phenolic profile of mango peel
and kernel.
Pomegranate juice has proved to be a very strong anti-oxidant; however, the
rind/peel is also in possession of life saving chemical properties202. The pomegranate
peel extract (PPE), when introduced into juice, improves the process intensity due to
acceleration of deposit precipitation of the haze-forming substance203. The presence of
antioxidants has been reported from pomegranate juice202. The much less acclaimed
pomegranate rind contains certain compounds that assist in AA204, gastroprotective
effects, antifungal activities205, antimicrobial action206, antiviral effects and
hypoglycemic effects207.
Some tannins are also thought to have strong antioxidant effects as well.
Pomegranates contain particularly a beneficial type of tannin known as an
ellagitannin, which are water-soluble combinations of ellagic acid and glucose that are
more digestible for animals. Ellagic acid is perhaps the most important compound
found in the pomegranate. Recent studies have exposed many of its advantageous
effects. It also acts as a scavenger, binding free-radicals and preventing oxidative
damage. In addition, ellagic acid derived from elagitannins hinders DNA mutation by
masking mutagen binding sites. The other compounds found in the rind of the
pomegranate, such as the flavanols contribute greatly to its many activities as well.
Flavanols have proved to promote cardiovascular health and reduce the severity of
thrombosis. A number of other activities are attributed to them as well. Improvements
in antioxidant defense systems, blood pressure, insulin resistance and glucose
tolerance are only some of the contributions of flavanols.
57
The combined mechanism of the many compounds in pomegranate rind has
manifested itself into an anti-diabetic effect. The National Organization for Drug
Control and Research discovered that pomegranate rind extract can lower blood
glucose levels and increase insulin levels in diabetic rats. The extract showed
significant effects on rat beta cells, the main cells destroyed in diabetes. The strong
evidence determined that "PPE can reduce blood sugar through regeneration of B cells
in the pancreas". This is just one mechanism amongst numerous others of
pomegranate rind that benefits the body. Pomegranate rind and its properties can
support a healthier body and lifestyle.
Areca nut extract suppresses T-cell activation and interferon-gamma
production via the induction of oxidative stress208. Methanolic extract of Areca
catechu showed anti-aging and strong scavenging activity against super-oxide anion
radical209. The areca nut contains tannin, gallic acid, a fixed oil gum, a little terpineol,
lignin, various saline substances and three main alkaloids: Arecoline, Arecaidine and
Guvacine which have vasoconstricting properties210, however little is known about
AA and phenolic profile of areca nut.
In the studies, the anti-diarrhoeal, antipyretic, antimicrobial and bio-
antimutagenic guava leaves have been used as health tea. Its leaf contains copious
amounts of phenolic phytochemicals which inhibit peroxidation reaction in the living
body, and therefore, can be expected to prevent various chronic diseases such as
diabetes, cancer and heart-disease. Furthermore, decreasing of free-radicals has
antioxidizing effect in the body, meaning these guava leaf polyphenols can prevent
arterial sclerosis, thrombosis, cataract and inhibit senescence of the body and skin211.
Many people habitually take medicinal decoction of guava leaf for long treatment of
58
diarrhea, and therefore, the safety of guava leaves have empirically been confirmed.
People in China use guava leaf as anti-inflammatory and haemostatic agent. It was
reported that the leaves of guava contain an essential oil rich in cineol, tannins and
triterpenes. In addition, three flavonoids (quercetin, avicularin, and guaijaverin) have
been isolated from the leaves. Lee212 (2003) have screened out methanolic extracts of
nine medicinal plants traditionally used in Chinese medicine for AA versus
resveratrol which has been shown to protect cells from oxidative damage.
Work showed that curry leaf has unusually high antioxidant activity compared
to other leafy vegetables. Antioxidant role of curry and beetle leaves in ghee by direct
extraction has been examined213. The antioxidant potential of carbozole alkaloids
from oleoresin of curry leaves procured from southern states of India has been
reported by Rao214 (2000). Their properties include much value as an antidiabetic215,
antioxidant216, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, hepatoprotective, anti-
hypercholesterolemic etc.
Betel leaves are traditionally added to butter while converting into ghee and in
some of the oily preparations in some parts of our country. These treatments are
reported to enhance the shelf life of the products. It is reported that the AA of Piper
betel has more potential to prevent lipid peroxidation than tea. The alkaloid arakene in
it has properties resembling cocaine in some respects.
2.8. FACTORS INFLUENCING THE RATE OF OXIDATION OF LIPID
FOODS
Oils that are more unsaturated are oxidized quickly than less unsaturated217. As
the degree of unsaturation increases, both the rate of formation and the amount of
59
primary oxidation compounds accumulated at the end of the IP increases218. Crude oil
contains free fatty acids, and oil processing, such as refining, decreases the free fatty
acid content219. But, processing of crude oils to refined oils is generally performed at
high temperature, and it can produce oxidized compounds such as cyclic and
noncyclic carbon-to-carbon-linked dimers and trimers, hydroxy dimers, and dimers
and trimers joined through carbon-to-oxygen linkage.
The oxidation of oil is influenced by the fatty acid composition of the oil, oil
processing, energy of heat or light, the concentration and type of oxygen, and free
fatty acids, mono- and diacylglycerols, transition metals, peroxides, thermally
oxidized compounds, pigments, and antioxidants. These factors interactively affect
the oxidation of oil and it is not easy to differentiate the individual effect of the
factors.
Edible fats and oils deteriorate faster when exposed to light due to its catalytic
effect on lipid oxidation220. Suzuki221 (1996) reported that lipid peroxides
decomposed faster at higher temperatures(370C) than at lower temperature(40C),
which was confirmed by a corresponding increase in levels of carbonyls formed at
higher temperature. Naz222 (2004) reported higher oxidative rates of soybean, corn and
olive oil used for deep-frying at 1800C than oils exposed to air and light. Lowering the
temperature could, therefore, reduce oxidation by slowing down oxidative reactions;
hence, fats and oils kept at low temperatures would be less prone to oxidation.
The study of Azizah25 (1999) also proved that temperature and light are major
factors influencing antioxidant activity during storage. Various studies have shown
this catalytic effect of light on lipid oxidation223. The catalytic effect is due to the
60
presence of natural pigments such as chlorophyll in a fat or oil, which act as
photosensitizers and transfer energy (hv) from light to ground state triplet
oxygen(3O2) to form singlet oxygen,(1O2) 220.
Fats and oils deteriorate in quality with time. Changes that occur during
deterioration include absorption of odours from surroundings (tainting), lipolysis and
oxidation224. Lipolysis is the enzymatic hydrolysis of ester linkages of lipids to release
free fatty acids, resulting in the development of lipolytic or hydrolytic rancidity of the
fats15. Oxidative rancidity occurs when fats containing PUFA are oxidized, resulting
in the breaking of the double bond of the unsaturated fatty acid molecules225 and
subsequent formation of various carbonyl compounds, hence a reduction in shelf life
of oil. Oxidative rancidity is, therefore, one of the major causes of lipid deterioration
leading to the development of off-flavours and off-odours in edible oils and other
lipid containing foods, which may also reduce the nutritional quality of foods226.
Fats and oils with a high degree of unsaturation are more susceptible to lipid
oxidation69. According to the degree of unsaturataion of fatty acids, the relative rates
of oxidation for oleic (C18:1), linoleic (C18:2), linolenic (C18:3) and arachidonic
acids (C18:4) are 1, 12, 25 and 50, respectively227. Chu228 (1998) found the oxidative
stability of various oils (soybean, high oleic safflower, corn, olive and peanut) to be
inversely related to the PUFA content, with linolenic acid (C18:3) having the most
influence on the oxidative stability index, followed by linoleic acid (C18:2) and oleic
acid (C18:1).
61
2.9. OXYGEN CONCENTRATION AND EXPOSED SURFACE AREA OF
THE LIPID
Availability of oxygen determines the rate of oxidation. This is true at low
oxygen concentrations where the rate of oxidation increases with an increase in
oxygen concentration, unlike when oxygen is abundant where the oxidation becomes
independent of oxygen concentration69. Koelsch229 (1991) showed that during the
oxidation of soybean oil at 2300C, the formation of hexanal (an important volatile
product of oxidation commonly used to determine the extent of lipid oxidation), as a
function of time, increased with increasing oxygen concentrations. The rate of
oxidation also increases with the surface area of the lipid that is exposed to air. Tan230
(2002) observed that oils with a high surface -to-volume ratio had lower oxidative
induction times than oils with a lower surface-to-volume ratio because of the fact that
a larger surface area of the oil is more exposed to oxygen.
The storage stability of edible vegetable oil has important bearing on the
safety aspects of human health as because the oxidation products are well known to
cause damage to our body cells resulting in large numbers of diseases. Hence,
enrichment of edible oils with natural antioxidants and not synthetic antioxidants will
ensure nutritional benefit to the people.
2.10. ASSESSMENT OF QUALITY OF OILS
One of the most important indicators of the quality of oils is their oxidative
stability230 which is the resistance of oil to oxidation231. Methods used to determine
the extent of oxidation of oils are based on the measurement of the concentration of
the primary or secondary products of oxidation. Various methods such as OSI232,
Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)233, 234, Rancimat method229, the
62
measurement of conjugated Diene hydroperoxides, volatile compounds such as
aldehydes, anisidine values(AV) 67, 233 and the measurement of PVs 67, 233 have been
used for assessing the extent of oxidation of edible oils. These methods employ
accelerated oxidation conditions such as exposing the oil at a determined constant
temperature, flow of air or the presence or absence of light and catalysts231 and
assessing the extent of oxidation. The measurement of PV and AV can be used to
monitor the formation of primary and secondary oxidation products respectively, as a
means of determining the quality of oils.
No off flavours were detected in sunflower oil stored for two years at room
temperature even when the PV increases from 8.5 to 22.6. Yousuf Ali Khan235 (1979)
noted development of detectable off-odours in sunflower oil stored at ambient
temperature when PV reached 25meq/kg oil. On the other hand, at higher storage
temperatures rancidity is detected at lower PVs. The average PV of soybean, low
erucic acid rapeseed and sunflower oil after eight days of storage at 600C when they
were perceived rancid were 8.3, 11.0 and 13.6 respectively236. In general, it appears
that at a higher storage temperature rate of decomposition of hydroperoxides is much
faster, which could lead to early development of rancidity than at lower
temperatures236.
Another consideration worth noting when interpreting PVs and development
of rancidity in oil samples is that a low PV may not always be an indication of good
quality oil. It is well known that during oxidation of fats and oils, the initial rate of
formation of hydroperoxides exceeds the rate of their decomposition and the relative
rates of these reactions are reversed during the later stages of oxidation237. According
to Dugan15 (1976) and O’Brien238 (2004), measurement of PV may be useful during
the initial stages of oxidation before extensive decomposition of hydroperoxides
begins.
63
REFERENCES
1. Hui Y.H. Antioxidants: Technical and Regulatory considerations in Bailey’s
Industrial oil and Fat Products Wiley Interscience Publications New York 3,
1996, pp 523-539.
2. www.biomatrixone.com
3. Cook, N. C. and Samman S. Flavonoids - chemistry, metabolism, cardio
protective effects and dietary sources. Nutr Biochem 7, 1996, pp 66-76.
4. Huang, M.T and Ferraro T. Phenolic compounds in food and cancer prevention. In
H.T .Huang, C.T, Ho and C.Y. Lee (Eds.) Phenolic compounds in food and their
effects on health II.ACS Symposium Series 507, 1992, pp 8-34.
5. Al-Saikhan, M.S, Howard, L.R, Miller, J.C., Jr. Antioxidant activity and total
phenolics in different genotypes of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). J Food Sci
60, 1995, pp 341-347.
6. Yen GC and Duh PD. Scavenging effect of methanolic extracts of peanut hulls
on free-radical and active oxygen species. J Agric Food Chem 42, 1995, 629-
632.
7. Oomah, B.D and Mazza, G. Flavonoids and antioxidative activities in
buckwheat. J Agric Food Chem 44 (7), 1996, pp 1746-1750
8. Chen, Z.Y., P.T. Chan. K.Y. Ho, K.P. Fung and J. Wang. Antioxidant activity
of natural Flavonoids are governed by number and location of their aromatic
hydroxyl groups. Chem Phys Lipids 79, 1996, pp 157-163.
9. Cao, G., E. Sofic and R.L. Prior. Antioxidant capacity of tea and common
vegetables. J Agric Food Chem 44, 1996, pp 3426-3431.
64
10. Amarowicz, R.A. Troszynska, M. Karamac and H. Kozlowska. Antioxidative
properties of legume extracts in agri-food quality. An interdisciplinary
Approach, edited by G.R. Fenwick, C. Hedley and S. Khokhar, The Royal
Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, 1996, pp 376-379.
11. Zhou KK, Su L, Yu L. Phytochemicals and antioxidant properties in wheat
bran. J Agric Food Chem 52, 2004, pp 6108-6114.
12. Halliwell B and Gutteridge JMC. Oxygen is a toxic gas an introduction to
oxygen toxicity and reactive oxygen species. In: Free Radical in Biology and
Medicine; Oxford University Press: United Kingdom. 1999, pp 1-35.
13. Wallace SS. Oxidative damage to DNA and its repair, in Oxidative Stress and
Molecular Biology of Antioxidant Defenses. Scandalios JG, editor; Cold
Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: Plainview New York. 1997, pp 49-90.
14. Stratil P, Klejdus B, Kubán V. Determination of total content of phenolic
compounds and their antioxidant activity in vegetables. Evaluation of
spectrophotometric methods. J Agric Food Chem 54, 2006, pp 607-616.
15. Dugan, L. Lipids. in: Fennema, O.R(Ed).Principles of Food Science. Part 1:
Food Chemistry. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.1976, pp 169-186.
16. Andres Moure, Jose M.Cruz, Daniel Franco, J.Manuel Dominguez, Jorge
Sineiro, Herminia Dominguez, Maria Jose Nunez and Carlos Parajo. Natural
Antioxidants from residual sources. Food Chem 72, 2001, pp 145-171.
17. Onyeneho, S. N. and Hettiarachchy, N.S. Antioxidant activity of durum wheat
bran J Agric Food Chem 40, 1992, pp 1496-1500.
18. Negro, C, Tommasi, L. and Miceli, A. Phenolic compounds and antioxidant
activity from red grape marc extracts. Bioresource Techn 87, 2003, pp 41-44
65
19. Gordon, M.H. and X.C. Weng. Antioxidant properties of extracts from
Tanshen (Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge) Food Chem 44, 1992, p119
20. Gamez-Meza N, J.A. Noriega-Rodriguez, l.A. Medina- Juarez, J. Ortega-
Garcia R. Cazarez- Casanova and Angulo-Guerrero, Antioxidant activity in
Soybean oil of Extracts from Thompson Grape Bagasse. J Am Oil Chem Soc
76(12), 1999, pp 1445-1447.
21. Gordon, M.H. The mechanism of antioxidant action in vitro. In: Hudson,
B.J.F. (Ed) Food antioxidants. England: Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd.
1990, pp 1-18.
22. Johnsen S, Overvad K, Stripp, C, Tjonneland, A. Husted S.E. and
Sorenson,H.T. Intake of Fruits and vegetables and the risk of ischemic stroke
in a cohort of Danish men and women, Am J Clin Nutr 78, 2003, pp 57-64.
23. Julkunen-Tiitto, R. Phenolic constituents in the leaves of northern willows:
methods for the analysis of certain phenolics. J Am Food Chem 33, 1985, pp
213-217.
24. Pin- Der Duh. Antioxidant activity of Budrock (Arctium lappa Linn.): its
scavenging effect on free radical and active oxygen, J Am Oil Chem Soc 75,
1998, pp 455-461.
25. Azizah A.H., Ruslawati, N.M.N and Swee Tee, T. Extraction and
characterization of antioxidant from cocoa by–products. Food Chem 64, 1999,
pp 199-202.
26. Pryzbylski, R., Lee YC and Eskin N.A.M. Antioxidant and radical scavenging
activities of buckwheat and its components. J Am Oil Chem Soc 75, 1998, pp
1595-1601.
66
27. Yu L, Perret J, Davy B, Wilson J, and Melby CL. Antioxidant properties of
cereal products. J of Food Sci 67(7), 2002b. pp 2600-2603.
28. Yu L, Haley S, Perret J, Harris M, Wilson J, Quin M. Free radical scavenging
properties of wheat extracts. J Agric Food Chem 50, 2002c, pp 1619-1624.
29. Gray, D.A, Clarke, M.J, Baux, C.Bunting, J.P, and Salter,A.M. Antioxidant
activity of oat extracts added to human LDL particles and in free radical
trapping assays. J Cer Sci.36, 2002, pp 209-218.
30. Yu, L., Hale, S, Perret, J. and Harris, M. Antioxidant properties of hard winter
wheat extracts. Food Chem, 78, 2002a, pp 457-461.
31. Adom KK, Sorrells ME, Liu RH. Phytochemical profiles and antioxidant
activity of wheat varieties. J Agric and Food Chem 51, 2003, pp 7825-7834.
32. Liyana-Pathirana CM, Shahidi F. Antioxidant properties of commercial soft
and hard winter wheats (Triticum aestivum L.) and their milling fractions. J Sci
Food Agric 86, 2006, pp 477-485.
33. Zielinski H. Antioxidant activity and total phenolics in selected cereal grains
and their different morphological fractions. J of Agric Food Chem. 48, 2000,
pp 2008-2016
34. Handelman GJ, Cao G, Walter MF, Nightingale ZD, Paul GL, Prior RL, and
Blumberg JB. Antioxidant capacity of oat (Avena sativa L.) extracts. 1.
Inhibition of low density lipoprotein oxidation and oxygen radical absorbance
capacity. J Agric Food Chem. 47, 1999, pp 4888-4893.
35. Awika JM. Anthocyanins from black sorghum and their antioxidant
properties. Food Chem 90, 2005, pp 293-231.
67
36. Diaz-Reinoso B, Moure A, Dominguez H, and Parajo JC. Supercritical CO2
extraction and purification of compounds with antioxidant activity. J Agric
Food Chem. 54, 2006, pp 2441-2469.
37. Bonoli M, Verardo V, Marconi E, and Caboni MF. Antioxidant Phenols in
Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Flour: Comparative Spectrophotometric Study
among Extraction Methods of Free and Bound Phenolic Compounds. J Agric
Food Chem. 52, 2004, pp 5195-5200.
38. Jagan Mohan Rao, L. Ramalakshmi, K. Borse, B.B. and Raghavan, B.
Antioxidant and radical scavenging carbazole alkaloids from the oleoresin of
curry leaf (Murraya koenigii Spreng.). Food Chem 100, 2007, pp 742-747.
39. Anwar, F, Bhanger M.I. and T.G. Kazi. Relationship between Rancimat and
active oxygen method values at varying temperatures for several oils and
fats. J Am Oil Chem Soc 80, 2003, pp 151-155.
40. Peschel, W, F.Sanchez-Rabaneda, W. Dickmann, A. Plesehen, I. Gartiza, D.
Jimenez, R.Lamuela-Raventos, S. Buxaderas and C. Codina. An Industrial
approach in the search of natural antioxidants from vegetables and fruit
wastes. Food Chem 97, 2006, pp 137-150.
41. Meyer, A.S., Heinonen, M., and Frankel, E.N. Antioxidant interactions of
catechin, cyanidin, caffeic acid, quercitin and ellagic acid on human LDL
oxidation. Food Chemi 61, 1998, pp 71-75.
42. Brand-Williams W, Cuvelier ME, Berset C. Use of a free radical method to
evaluate antioxidant activity. Fat Sci Technol 28, 1995, pp 25-30.
43. Von Gadow, A., E. Joubert and C.F. Hansmann. Comparison of Antioxidant
activity of aspalathin with that of other plant phenols of Rooibosed tea
68
(Aspalathin linearis), ∞- tocopherol, BHT and BHA, J Agric Food Chem 45,
1997c, pp 632- 638.
44. Pekkarinen. S, Stockmann. H, Schwarz. K, Heinonen, M, and Hopia. A.I.
Antioxidant activity and portioning of phenolic acids in bulk and emulsified
methyl linoleate. J Agric Food Chem, 47, 1999, pp 3036-3043.
45. Karamac, M and Amarowicz, R. Antioixdant activity of BHA, BHT and
TBHQ examined with Miller’s test. Grasas y Aceites, 48, 1997, pp 83-86.
46. Kuti J. O and Konuru, H. B. Antioxidant capacity and phenolic content in leaf
extracts of tree spinach (Cnidoscolus spp.) J Agric Food Chem 2004, pp 117-
121.
47. Frankel, E.N. and A.S. Meyer. The problem of using one dimensional method
to evaluate multifunctional food and biological antioxidants. J Sci Food and
Agric 80, 2000, pp 1925-1941.
48. Sanchez- Mareno C. Review: Methods to evaluate the free radical scavenging
activity in foods and biological systems. Food Sci Technol Intern 8, 2002, pp
121-137.
49. Waterman, P.G. and Mole, S. Analysis of Plant Metabolites. Oxford: Alden
Press Limited. 1994, pp 1-16 & 66-103
50. Prior RL, Wu XL, Schaich K. Standardized methods for the determination of
antioxidant capacity and phenolics in foods and dietary supplements. J Agric
Food Chem 53, 2005, pp 4290-4302.
51. Halliwell B, Aeschbach R, Loliger J, Aruoma OI. The characterization of
antioxidants. Food Chem Tox 33, 1995, pp 601-617.
69
52. Kim J.S and Kim M.J. In vitro antioxidant activity of Lespedeza cuneata
methanolic extracts, J Med Plants Res Vol. 4(8), 2010, pp. 674-679.
53. Wanasundara, U.N., Amarowic, R. and Shahidi, F. Partial characterization of
natural antioxidants in canola meal. Food Res Intern 28, 1996, 525-530.
54. Wright, J. S, Johnson, E. R, Di Labio, G. A. Predicting the activity of
phenolic antioxidants: theoretical method, analysis of substituent effects, and
application to major families of antioxidants. J Am Chem Soc 123, 2001, pp
1173-1183.
55. Perez-Jimenez J, and Saura-Calixto F. Literature data may underestimate the
actual antioxidant capacity of cereals. J Agric Food Chem 53, 2005 pp 5036-
5040.
56. Huang D, Ou B, Prior RL. The chemistry behind antioxidant capacity assays. J
Agric Food Chem 53, 2005, pp 1841-1856.
57. Wu X, Beecher GR, Holden JM, Haytowitz DB, Gebhardt SE and Prior RL.
Lipophilic and hydrophilic antioxidant capacities of common foods in the
United States. J Agric Food Chem 52, 2004, pp 4026-4037
58. G.C. Yen and P.D. Duh. Scavenging effect of methanolic extracts of peanut
hulls on free radical and active-oxygen species. J. Agric. Food Chem. 42,
1994, pp 629–632.
59. C.W. Chen and C.T. Ho. Antioxidant properties for polyphenols extracted
from green and black teas. J. Food Lipids 2, 1995, pp 35–46.
60. Lia LS Chou ST and Chao WW. Studies on the antioxidative activities of
Hsian-Tsao (Mesona procumbens Hesml) leaf gum. J Agric Food Chem 49
2001, pp 963-968.
70
61. Jayaprakasha GK, Singh RP and Sakariah KK. Antioxidant activity of grape
seed Vitis vinifera extracts on peroxidation models in-vitro Food Chem 73,
2001, pp 285-290.
62. Yen GC and Chen HY. Antioxidant activity of various tea extracts in relation
to their antimutagenicity J Agric Food Chem 1995, pp 4327-4232.
63. Osawa Toshihiko and Namiki Mitsuo. A Novel Type of Antioxidant Isolated
from Leaf Wax of Eucalyptus leaves, Agric. Biol. Chem.45(3), 1981, pp 735-
739.
64. Ramakrishna BV, Jayaprakasha GK, Jena BS, Singh RP. Antioxidant
activities of roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa) calyces and fruit extracts, J Food Sci
and Technol 45(3), 2008, pp 223-227.
65. Frankel, E. N. Lipid Oxidation. The Oily Press, Dundee, UK 1998, pp 99-
114.
66. Coupland JN and Mc Clements DJ. Lipid oxidation in food emulsions, Trends
Food Sci and Technol 7, 1996, pp 83-91.
67. Abdalla, A.E. and Roozen, J.P. Effect of plant extracts on the oxidative
stability of sunflower oil emulsion. Food Chem 64, 1999, pp 323-329.
68. Frankel, E.N. and Huang S.W. Improving the Oxidative Stability of
Polyunsaturated Vegetable oils by Blending with High-Oleic Sunflower oil, J
Am Oil Chem Soc 71, 1994, pp 255-259.
69. Nawar, W. W. Lipids. In: Fennema, O.R. (Ed) Food Chemistry. 3rd Ed. New
York: Marcel Dekker, Inc. 1996, pp 225-319.
71
70. Huang, S, Frankel, E.N. and German, J.B. Antioxidant activity of α and γ-
tocopherols in bulk oils and in oil-in water emulsions. J Agric Food Chem, 42,
1994, 2108-2114.
71. Gordon MH. Measuring antioxidant activity. In: Pokorný J, Yanishlieva N,
Gordon M, editors. Antioxidants in food: practical application. Cambridge
England: Woodhead Publishing Limited. 2001a, pp 73-84.
72. Lachance PA, Nakat Z and Jeong WS. Antioxidants: an integrative approach.
Nutr 17, 2001, pp 835-838.
73. Yanishlieva N. Inhibiting oxidation. In: Pokorný J, Yanishlieva N, Gordon M,
editors. Antioxidants in food: practical application. Cambridge England:
Woodhead Publishing Limited. 2001, pp 22-70.
74. Li B, Yang Y, Gan Y, Eaton CD, He P, Jones AD. On-line coupling of
subcritical water extraction with high-performance liquid chromatography via
solid-phase trapping. J Chromatogr A 87(3), 2000, pp 175-84.
75. Vinson JA, Su X, Zubik L and Bose P. Phenol antioxidant quantity and quality
in foods: fruits. J Agric Food Chem 49, 2001, pp 5315-5321.
76. Whysner, J, Wang, C.X, Zang, E. Iatropoulos M.J. and Williams, G.M. Dose
response of promotion by butylated hydroxyanisole in chemically initiated
tumours of the rat fore stomach. Food Chem Toxicol 32, 1994, pp 215 -222.
77. Khokhar, S. and Apenten, R.K.O. Iron binding characteristics of phenolic
compounds: some tentative structure-activity relationships. Food Chem 81,
2003, pp 133-140.
72
78. Kikugawa, K.A. Kunugi and T. Kurechi. Chemistry and implications of
Degradation of phenolic antioxidants, Chapter 3, in Food antioxidants, edited
by BJF Hudson, Elsevier Applied Science, Inc., New York, 1990, pp 65-98.
79. Decker EA. Antioxidant mechanisms. In: Akoh CC, Min DB, editors. Food
lipids. New York: Marcel Dekker. 2002, pp 517–542.
80. Mahoney and Graf E. Role of α-tocopherol, ascorbic acid and EDTA as
antioxidant in model system. J Food Sci 51, 1986; pp 1293-1296.
81. Tong L.M, Sasaki, S, Mc Clements, D.J and Decker, E.A. Mechanism of
antioxidant activity of a high molecular weight fraction of whey. J Agric and
Food Chem 48, 2000, pp 1473-1478.
82. Yamaguchi, F, Yoshimura, Y, Nakazawa, H. and Ariga, T. Free radical
scavenging activity of grape extract and antioxidants by electron spin
resonance spectrometry in an H2O2/NaOH/DMSO system. J Agric Food Chem
47, 1999, pp 2544-2548.
83. Schuler, P. Natural antioxidants exploited commercially. In: Hudson, B.J.F.
(Ed) Food Antioxidants. England: Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd, 1990, pp
99-170.
84. Purvankara D. Boghra V and Sharma RS. Effect of antioxidant principles
isolated from mango (Mangifera indica L) seed kernels on oxidative stability
of buffalo ghee (butter-fat). J Sci Food Agric 80, 2000, pp 522-526.
85. Arogba, S. S. Mango (Mangifera indica) kernal: Chromatographic analysis of
the Tannin, and stability study of the associated polyphenol oxidase activity. J
Food Comp and Anal, 13, 2000, pp 149-156.
73
86. Kabuki, T. Nakajima H, Arai, M, Ueda, S. Kuwabara, Y. and Dosako, S.
Characterization of novel antimicrobial compounds from mango (Mangifera
indica L.) kernel seeds. Food Chem 71, 2000, pp 61-66.
87. Gurdip Singh, Sumitra Maurya, M.P. de Lampasona, Cesar A.N. Catalan A
comparison of chemical, antioxidant and antimicrobial studies of cinnamon
leaf and bark volatile oils, oleoresins and their constituents. Food Chem
Toxicol 45(9), 2007, pp 1650-1661.
88. Halliwell, B, Aeschbach, R, Loliger, J, Aruoma, O.I. The characterization of
antioxidants. Food Chem Toxicol. 33, 1995, pp 601-617
89. Pokorný J, Korczak J. Preparation of natural antioxidants. In: Pokorný J,
Yanishlieva N, Gordon M, editors. Antioxidants in food: practical application.
Cambridge England: Woodhead Publishing Limited. 2001, pp 311-341.
90. Halliwell, B. and Gutteridge, J.M.C. Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine.
Clarendon Press: Oxford, 1989, p 236.
91. Wanasundara UN, Shahidi F. Antioxidant and prooxidant activity of green tea
extracts in marine oils. Food Chem 63, 1998, pp 335-342.
92. Kochhar, S.P. and Rossell J.B. Detection, Estimation and Evaluation of
antioxidants in Food systems. Chapter 2, in Food Antioxidants, edited by
B.J.F. Hudson, Elsevier Applied Science, London, 1990, pp 19-64.
93. Stauffer, C.E. Fats and Oils. Minnesota, USA: Eagan Press. 1996, pp 1-14.
94. Chu, Y.H and Hsu, H.F. Effects of antioxidants on peanut oil stability. Food
Chemistry, 66, 1999, pp 29-34.
74
95. Barlow SM. Toxicological aspects of antioxidants used as food additives. In:
Hudson BJF, editor. Food antioxidants. New York: Elsevier. 1990, pp 253-
307.
96. Ito, N, Hirose, M, Fukushima, S, Tsuda, H, Shirai, T. and Tatematsu, M.
Studies on antioxidants: Their carcinogenic and modifying effects on chemical
carcinogenesis. Food Chem Toxicol 24, 1986, pp 1071-1082.
97. Frankel, E.N. Antioxidants in food and their impact on food quality. Food
Chem 57, 1996, pp 51-55
98. Malecka, M. Antioxidant properties of the unsaponifiable matter isolate from
tomato seeds, oat grains and wheat germ oil. Food Chem 79, 2002, 327-330.
99. Shi H, Noguchi N and Niki E. Introducing natural antioxidants. In: Pokorný J,
Yanishlieva N, Gordon M, editors. Antioxidants in food: practical application.
Cambridge England: Woodhead Publishing Limited. 2001, pp 147-158.
100. Sherwin E.R. Antioxidants. In: Food Additives, Eds. A.L. Branen, P.M.
Davidson and S. Salminen. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc. 1990 pp 144-145.
101. Vekiari SA, Oreopoulou V, Tzia C, Thomopoulos CD. Oregano flavonoids as
lipid antioxidants. J Am Oil Chem Soc 70, 1993, pp 483-487.
102. Pratt D, Hudson BJF. Natural antioxidants not exploited commercially. In:
Hudson BJF, editor. Food antioxidants. New York: Elsevier. 1990, pp 171-
191.
103. Naczk M and Shahidi F. Phenolics in cereals, fruits and vegetables:
occurrence, extraction and analysis. J Pharm Biomed Anal 41, 2006, pp 1523-
1542.
75
104. Rice-Evans C., Miller, N.J and Paganga, G. Antioxidant properties of phenolic
compounds. Trends in Plant Science 2, 1997, pp 152-159
105. Luzia, M.R., Trugo, L.C, Da Paixao, K.C.C, Marchilio, R, De Maria, C.A.B
and Quinteiro, L.M.C. Effect of 5-caffeoylquinic acid I the presence of metal
chelators on soybean oil oxidative stability. Lebesmittel Wissesschaft Und
Technologie 31, 1998, pp 64-68
106. Sugihara, N. Arakawa, T., Ohnishi, M and Furuno, K. Anti and pro-oxidative
effects of flavonoids on metal- induced lipid hydroperoxide-dependent lipid
peroxidation in cultured hepatocytes loaded with α-linoleic acid. Free Radical
Biology and Medicine 27, 1999, pp 1313-1323
107. Rodriguez De Sotillo, D., Hadley, M. and Holm, E.T. Phenolics in aqueous
potato peel extract: Extraction, identification and degradation. J Food Sci 59,
1994b, pp 649-651.
108. Abushita, A.A, Hebshi, E.A, Daood, H.G and Bias, P.A. Determination of
antioxidant vitamins in tomatoes. Food Chem 60, 1997, pp 207-212.
109. Aruoma, O.I, Spencer, J.P.E., Warren, D., Jenner, P., Butler, J. and Halliwell,
B. Characterization of food antioxidants, illustrated using commercial garlic
and ginger preparations. Food Chem 60, 1997, pp 149-156.
110. Velioglu, Y.S., Mazza, G., Gao, L. and Oomah, B.D. Antioxidant activity and
total phenolics in selected fruits, vegetables and grain products. J Agric Food
Chem 46, 1998, pp 4113-4117.
111. Naczk, M, Amarowicz, R, Sullivan, A. and Shahidi, F. Current research
developments on polyphenolics of rapeseed/canola: a review. Food Chem 62,
1998, pp 489-502.
76
112. Chun, O.K., Kim, D., Moon, H.Y., Kang, HG and Lee, C.Y. Contribution of
individual polyphenolics to total antioxidant capacity of plums. J Agric Food
Chem 51, 2003, pp 7240-7245.
113. Kroyer G.T. Red clover extract as antioxidant active and functional food
ingredient. Inn Food Sci and Emer Technol 5, 2004, pp 101-105.
114. Hagerman, A.E, Riedl, K.M., Alexander Jones, G, Sovik, K.N, Ritchard, N.T,
Hartzfeld, P.W. and Riechel, T.L. High molecular weight plant polyphenolics
(tannins) as biological antioxidants. J Agric Food Chem 46, 1998, pp 1887-
1892.
115. Awika JM, Rooney LW, Wu X, Prior RL, Cisneros-Zevallos L. Screening
methods to measure antioxidant activity of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) and
sorghum products. J Agric Food Chem 51, 2003, pp 6657-6662.
116. Awika, J.M. and Rooney, L.W. Sorghum phytochemicals and their potential
impact on human health. Phytochem 65, 2004, pp 1199-1221.
117. Saint-Cricq de Gaulejac, N., Provost, C., and Vivas, N. Comparative study of
polyphenol scavenging activities assessed by different methods. J Agric Food
Chem 47, 1999, pp 425-431.
118. Garcia-Conesa, M.T, Wilson, P.D, Plumb, G.W., Ralph, J. and Williamson. G.
Antioxidant properties of 4, 4’-dihydroxy-3, 3’-dimethoxy-beta, beta’-
bicinnami acid (8-8-diferulic acid, non cyclic form). J Sci Food and Agric 79,
1999, pp 379-384.
119. Milic, B.L. Djilas, S.M. and Canadonovic-Brunet, J.M. Antioxidative activity
of phenolic compounds on the metal-ion breakdown of lipid peroxidation
system. Food Chem, 61, 1998, pp 443-447.
77
120. Plumb G.W, Price, K.R and Williamson, G. Antioxidant properties of flavonol
glycosides from green beans. Redox Report, 4, 1999a, pp 123-127.
121. Plumb G.W, Price, K.R. and Williamson, G. Antioxidant properties of
flavonol glycosides from tea. Redox Report, 4, 1999b, pp 13-16.
122. Pietta P, Simonetti P, Gardana C, and Mauri P. Trolox Equivalent antioxidant
capacity (TEAC) of Ginkgo biloba flavonol and Camellia sinensis catechin
metabolites. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 23, 2000, pp 223-226.
123. Rodriguez De Sotillo, D, Hadley, M. and Holm, E.T. Potato peel waste:
Stability and antioxidant activity of a freeze dried extract. J Food Sci 59,
1994a, pp 649-651.
124. Haslam, E., Lilley, T.H., Warminski, E., Liao, H., Cai Y. Martin, R. Gaffney,
S.H, Goulding, P.N. and Luck, G. Polyphenol complexation: A study in
molecular recognition. In: Ho, C., Lee, C.Y. and Huang, M. (Eds) Phenolic
Compounds in Food and their effects on health I: Analysis, Occurrence and
Chemistry, USA: Am Chem Soc 1992, pp 8-9.
125. Murkovic, M., Phenolic compounds. In: Caballero, B., Trugo, L.C. and
Finglas, P.M. (Eds). Encyclopedia of Food Sciences, 2nd Ed. Oxford. Elsevier
Science Ltd. 2003, pp 4507-4514.
126. Friedman, M. and Jurgens, H.S. Effect of pH on the stability of plant phenolic
compounds. J Agric Food Chem 48, 2000, pp 2101-2110.
127. Kaaber, L, Martinsen, B.K, Brathen, E. and Shomer, I. Browning inhibition
and textural changes of pre-peeled potatoes caused by anaerobic conditions.
Lebesmittel-Wissenschaft und-Technologie 35, 2002, pp 526-531.
78
128. Nagendra Prasad, K. Soundar Divakar, Gyarahally R Shivamurthy and
Somaradhya Mallikarjuna Aradhya. Isolation of a free radical-scavenging
antioxidant from water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica Forsk). J Sci Food Agric
85, 2005, pp 1461-1468.
129. Di Carlo, G, Mascolo, N, Izzo, A.A. and Capasso, F. Flavonoids old and new
aspects of a class of natural therapeutic drugs. Life Sci 65, 1999, pp 337-353.
130. Valentao, P, Fernandes, E, Carvalho, F, Andrade, P.B, Seabra, R.M. and de
Lourdes Bastos, M. Antioxidant activity of Hypericum androsaemum infusion:
scavenging activity against superoxide radical, hydroxyl radical and
hypochlorous acid. Biol Pharm Bull 25, 2002, pp 1320-1323
131. Suganya Tachakittirungrod, Siriporn Okonogi, and Sombat
Chowwanapoonpohn. Study on antioxidant activity of certain plants in
Thailand: Mechanism of antioxidant action of Guava. Food Chem 103 2007,
pp 381-388.
132. Kirtan Tarwadi and Vaishali Agte. Antioxidant and micronutrient quality of
fruit and root vegetables from the Indian subcontinent and their comparative
performance with green leafy vegetables and fruits. J Sci Food and Agric 85,
2005, pp 1469-1476.
133. Monika Bajpai, Alka Mishra and Dhan Prakash. Antioxidant and Free Radical
scavenging activities of some leafy vegetables. Intern J Food Sci and Nut 56,
2005, pp 473-481
134. Hudson, B.J.F. and Lewis. J.I. Polyhydroxy Flavonoid Antioxidants for Edible
Oils: Structural Criteria for Activity. Food Chem.10, 1983, pp 47-55.
79
135. Shahidi, F, P. K. Janitha, P. D. Wanasundara. Phenolic antioxidants, Crit. Rev.
Food Sci Nutr 32, 1992, pp 67-103.
136. Van Den Berg R, Haenen GRMM, Van Den Berg H, Van Der Vijgh W and
Bast, A. The predictive value of the antioxidant capacity of structurally related
flavonoids using the Trolox Equivalent antioxidant Capacity (TEAC) assay,
Food Chem 70, 2000, pp 391-395.
137. Rice Evans, C.A, Miller, N.J, Paganga, G. Structure-antioxidant activity
relationship of flavonoids and phenolic acids. Free Rad Biol Med 1996, 20, pp
933-956.
138. Larrauri J.A., Sanchez-Moreno, C and Saura-Calixto, F. Effect of temperature
on the free radical scavenging capacity of extracts from red and white grape
pomace peels. J Agric Food Chem 46, 1998, pp 2694-2697.
139. Bors, W, Werner, H, Michel, C and Saran, M. Flavonoids as antioxidants:
determination of radical scavenging efficiencies. Methods Enzymol 186, 1990,
pp 343-355.
140. Blokhina O, Virolainen E, Fagerstedt KV. Antioxidants, oxidative damage and
oxygen deprivation stress: a review. Ann Botany 91, 2003, pp 179-194.
141. Nijveldt RJ, van Nood E, van Hoorn DEC, Boelens PG, van Norren K, van
Leeuwen PAM. Flavonoids: A review of probable mechanisms of action and
potential applications. Am J Clin Nutr 74, 2001, pp 418-425.
142. Odaci D, Timur S, Pazarlioglu N, Montereali MR, Vastarella W, Pilloton R,
Telefoncu A. Determination of phenolic acids using Trametes versicolor
laccase. Talanta 71, 2007, pp 312-317.
80
143. Sanbongi, C., Osakabe, N., Natsume, M., Takizawa, T.,Gomi, S and Osawa,T.
Antioxidative polyphenols isolated from Theobroma cacao. J Agric Food
Chem 46, 1998, pp 1460-1464.
144. Friedman, M. Chemistry, biochemistry and dietary role of potatao
polyphenols. J Agric Food Chem 45, 1997, pp 1523-1540
145. Gil, M.I., Ferreres, F. and Tomas - Barberan, F.A. Effect of post harvest
storage and processing on the antioxidant constituents (Flavonoids and
vitamin C) of fresh- cut spinach. J Agric Food Chem 47, 1999, pp 2213-2217.
146. Ganthavorn, C and Hughes, J.S. Inhibition of soybean oil oxidation by extracts
of dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris), J Am Oil Chem Soc 74, 1997, pp 1025-
1030.
147. Markus, F., Daood, H.G., Kapitany, J. and Biacs, P.A. Change in the
carotenoid and antioxidant content of spice red pepper (Paprika) as a function
of ripening and some technological factors. J Agric Food Chem 47, 1999, pp
100-107.
148. Kikuzaki, H., and Nakatani, N. Antioxidant effects of some ginger
constituents. J Food Sci 58, 1993, pp 1407-1410.
149. Che Man, Y.B and Tan, C.P. Effects of natural and synthetic antioxidants on
changes in refined, bleached and deoderised palm olein during deep-fat frying
of potato chips. J Agric Food Chem 76, 1999, pp 331-339.
150. Chambers, S.J, Lambert, N, Plumb, G.W and Williamson, G. Evaluation of
the antioixdant properties of a methanolic extract from ‘Juice Plus fruit’ and
Juice Plus vegetable’ (dietary supplements). Food Chem 57, 1996, pp 271-
274.
81
151. Cano, A., Acosta, M., and Banon. M. Estimation de la actividad antioxidnate
de distintas bebidas comerciales. Alimentaria, 9, 1998, pp 73-76.
152. Masuda, T., Yonemori, S., Oyama, Y., Takeda, Y., Tanaka, T., Andoh, T.,
Shinohara, A. and Nakata. M. Evaluation of the antioxidant activity of
environmental plants, activity of the leaf extracts from sea shore plants. J
Agric Food Chem 47, 1999, pp 1749-1754.
153. Nakayama, R., Tamura, Y., Kikuzaki, H., and Naakatani, N. Antioxidant
effect of the constituents of Susabinori (Parphyra yezoensis). J Am Oil Chem
Soc 76, 1999, pp 649-653.
154. Furuta, S., Nishiba, Y and Suda I. Fluorometric assay for screening
antioxidative activity of vegetables. J Food Sci 62, 1997, pp 526-528.
155. Osawa, T., Katsuzaki, H., Hagiwara, Y., Hagiwara, H., and Shibamoto T. A
novel antioxidant isolated from young green barley leaves. J Agric Food Chem
40, 1992, pp 1135-1138.
156. Torres, A.M., Mau- Lastovicka,T., and Rezaaiyan, R. Total phenolics and high
performance liquid chromatography of phenolic acids of avocado. J Agric
Food Chem, 35, 1987, pp 921-925
157. Tsuda, T., Watanabe, M., Oshima, K., Yamamoto, A., Kawakishi, S. and
Osawa, T. Antioxidative components isolated from the seed of tamarind
(Tamarindus indica L.). J Agric Food Chem 42, 1994, pp 2671-2674.
158. Krygier, K, Sosulski, F and Hogge, L. Free, esterified and insoluble-bound
phenolic acids.1.Extraction and purification procedure. J Agric Food Chem
30, 1982, pp 330-334.
82
159. Ozcan. M. Antioxidant activity of rosemary (Rosmanarius officinalis L.)
extracts on natural olive and sesame oils.Grasas y Aceites 50, 1999, pp 355-
358.
160. Balasinka, B., and Troszynska, A. Total antioxidant activity of evening
primerose (Oenothera biennis L) cake extract measured in vitro by liposome
model and murine L1210 cells. J Agric Food Chem 46, 1998, pp 3558-3563.
161. Kubicka, E., Jedrychowski, L., Amarowicz, R. Effect of phenolic compounds
extracted from sunflower seeds on native lipoxygease activity. Grasas y
Aceites 50, 1999, pp 3206-3209.
162. Baublis, A., Decker, E.A. and Clydesdale, F.M. Antioxidant effect of aqueous
extracts from wheat based ready-to-eat breakfast cereals. Food Chem 68,
2000, pp 1-6.
163. Kurilich, A.C., and Juvik, J.A. Quantification of carotenoid and tocopherol
antioxidants in Zea mays. J Agric Food Chem 47, 1999, pp 67-70.
164. Shahidi, F and Naczk, M. Food phenolics. Sources, Chemistry, effects and
applications. Lancaster, USA: Technomic Pub. Co. 1995, p128.
165. Yen, G.C., Duh, P.D. and Tsai, C.L. Relationship between antioxidant activity
and maturity of peanut hulls. J Agric Food Chem 41, 1993, pp 67-70.
166. Duh, P.D., Yen, W.J., Du, P.C. and Yen, G.C. Antioxidant activity of mung
bean hulls. J Am Oil Chem Soc 74, 1997, pp 1059-1063.
167. Watanabe, M, Ohshita, Y. and Tsushida, T. Antioxidant compounds from
buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) hulls. J Agric Food Chem 45,
1997, pp 1039-1044.
83
168. Sheabar, F.Z. and Neeman, I. Separation and concentration of natural
antioxidants from rape of olives. J Am Oil Chem Soc 65, 1988, pp 990-993.
169. Visioli, F, Romani, A, Mulinacci, N., Zarini, S, Conte, D, Vincieri, F.F and
Galli, C. Antioxidant and other biological activities of olive mill waste waters.
J Agric and Food Chem 47, 1999, pp 3397-3401.
170. Gabrielska, J, Oszmianski, J and Lamer-Zarawska, E. Protective effect of
plant flavonoids on the oxidation of lecithin liposomes. Pharmazie, 52, 1997,
pp 2-3.
171. Bonilla, F, Mayen, M, Merida, J and Medina, M. Extraction of phenolic
compounds from red grape marc for use as food lipid antioxidants. Food
Chem 66, 1999, pp 209-215.
172. Lu, Y. and Foo, L.Y. Identification and quantification of major polyphenols in
apple pomace. Food Chem 59, 1997, pp 187-194.
173. Bocco, A., Cuvelier, M.E., Richard, H., and Berset, C. Antioxidant activity
and phenolic composition of citrus peel and seed extracts. J Agric Food Chem
46, 1998, pp 2123-2129.
174. Chen, B.H. and Tang, Y.C. Processing and stability of carotenoid power from
carrot pulp waste. J Agric Food Chem 46, 1998, pp 2312-2318.
175. Zandi, P., and Gordon, M.H. Antioxidant activity of extracts from old tea
leaves. Food Chem 64, 1999, pp 285-288.
176. Vargas-Arispuro, I, Sanz, B.I. Martinez-Tellez, M.A and Primo-Yufera, E.
Actividad antioxidante de compuestos aislados del residuo no-volatil del
aceite esencial de naranja. Grasa y Aceites, 49, 1998, pp 159-164.
84
177. Hosny, M and Rosazza, J.P.N. Novel isoflavone, cinnamic acid and
triterpenoid glycosides in soybean molasses. J Nat Prod 62, 1999, pp 853-858.
178. Bertholet, R., Kusy, A, Rivier, V and Colarow, L. Antioixdant composition
and process for the preparation thereof. US Patent US5714094. 1998.
179. Niwa, K., and Motoyama, S. Antioxidant composition of natural products and
producing method thereof. US Patent US5009891. 1991.
180. Food and Agriculture Organisation FAOSTAT database collections,
agricultural data, food and agriculture organizations of the United Nations.
2006. Available from: http://faostat.fao.org.
181. Kauer C and Kapoor C. Antioxidants in fruit and vegetables - the
millennium’s health. Intern J Food Sci and Tech 36, 2001, pp 703-725.
182. Kim,Y, Brecht, J.K. and Talcott, S.T. Antioxidant phytochemical and fruit
quality changes in mango (Mangifera indica L.) following hot water
immersion and controlled atmosphere storage. Food Chem 105, 2007, pp
1327-1334.
183. Franke, A, Custer, L.J, Arakaki, C and Murphy, S.P. Vitamin C and flavonoid
levels of fruits and vegetables consumed in Hawaii .J Food Comp Anal 17,
2004, pp 1-35.
184. Godoy, H.T and Rodriguez Amaya, D.B. Carotenoid composition of
commercial mangoes from Brazil Lebensmittel- Wissenschaft und-
Technologie, 22, 1989, pp 100-103.
185. Berardini, N, Carle, R, Schieber, A. Characterization of gallotannins and
benzophenone derivatives from mango (Mangifera indica L. Cv. Tommy
Atkins) peels, pulp and kernels by high-performance liquid chromatography /
85
electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Rapid communications in Mass
Spectrometry, 18, 2004, pp 2208-2216.
186. Berardini, N, Fezer, R, Conrad, J, Beifuss, U, Carle, R and Schieber. A.
Screening of mango (Mangifera indica L.) cultivars for their contents of
flavonol O - and xanthone C-glycosides, anthocyanins, and pectin. J Agric
Food Chem 53, 2005a, pp 1563-1570.
187. Schieber, A, Ullrich, W and Carle, R. Characterization of polyphenols in
mango puree concentrate by HPLC with diode array and mass spectrometric
detection. Inno Food Sci and Emerging. Technol 1, 2000, pp 161-166.
188. Berardini, N, Kn"odler, M, Schieber, A. and Carle, R. Utilization of mango
peels as a source of pectin and polyphenols, Inn Food Sci Emerging Technol
6, 2005b, pp 442-452.
189. Larrauri, J.A, Gone, I, Martin-Carron, N, Ruperez, P. and Saura- Calixto, F.
Measurement of health-promoting properties in fruit dietary fibers: antioxidant
capacity, fermentability and glucose retardation index. J Sci Food and Agric
71, 1996, pp 515-519.
190. Larrauri, J.A, Ruperez, P and Saura-Calixto, F. Mango peel fibers with
antioxidant activity. Z. Lebensm.-Unters -Forch. 205, 1997 b, pp 39-42.
191. Escarpa, A and Gonzalez, M.C, Approach to the content of total extractable
phenolic compounds from different food samples by compartison of
chromatographic and spectrophotometric methods. Anal.Chim.Acta 2001,
427, pp 119-127.
86
192. Ajila, C.M, Bhat, S.G, Prasada Rao, U.J.S. Valuable components of raw and
ripe peels from two Indian mango varieties, Food Chem 102, 2007, pp 1006-
1011.
193. Manach, C, Mazur, A and Scalbert, A. Polyphenols and prevention of
cardiovascular diseases.Curr Opin Lipodol 16, 2005, pp 77-84.
194. Pannala, A.S, Chan, T.S, O’Brien, P.J and Rice Evans C.A. Flavonoid B-ring
Chemisrtry and antioxidant activity. Fast reaction kinetics. Biochem Biophys
Res Commun 282, 2001, pp 1161-1168.
195. Peng, G, Dixon, D.A, Muga, S.J, Smith, T.J and Wargovich, M. Green tea
polyphenol (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate, inhibitory cyclogenase-2-expression
in colon carcinogenisis. Mol Carcin 45, 2006, pp 309-319.
196. Kim, J.D, Liu, L, Guo, W and Meydani, M. Chemical structure of flavonols in
relation to modulation of angiogensis and immune endothelial cell adhesion. J
Nut Biochem 17, 2006, pp 165-176.
197. Sanchez, G.M, Re, L, Giuliani, A, Nunez-Selles, A.J, Davison, G.P and Leon-
Fernandez, O.S. Protective effects of Mangifera indica L. extract, mangiferin
and selected TPA-induced biomolecules oxidation and peritoneal macrophage
activation in mice.Pharmacol.Res.,42, 2000, pp 565-573.
198. Guha S, Ghosal, S and Chattopadhyay,U. Antitumor, immuno modulatory and
anti- HIV effect of mangiferin, a naturally occuring glucosylxanthone.
Chemotherapy 42, 1996, pp 443-451.
199. Balasundaram, N, Sundaram, K and Samman, S. Phenolic compounds in
plants and agri-industrial by-products: Antioxidant activity, occurrence and
potential uses. Food Chem 1999, 2005, pp 191-203.
87
200. Schiber, A, Berardini, N and Carle, R. Identification of flavonol and xanthol
glycosides from mango peels by HPLC. J Agric Food Chem 51, 2003, pp
5006-5011.
201. Abdalla, A.E.M, S.M. Darwish, E.H.E. Ayad and R.M. El- Hamahmy.
Egyptian mango by-product 1. Compositional quality of mango seed kernel. J.
Food Chem 103 2006, pp 1134-1140.
202. Gil, M. I, Tomas-Barberan, F. A, Hess-Pierce, B, Holcroft, D. M and Kader,
A. Antioxidant activity of pomegranate juice and its relationship with
phenolic composition and processing. J Agric Food Chem 48, 2000, pp 4581–
4589
203. Kvasenkov, O.I, Lomachinski, V.A and Goren’ Kov, Eh. S. Method of
producing beverages on juice base. Russian Patent 2129396C1, 1999.
204. Chidambaramurthy KN, Jayaprakasha GK, Singh RP. Antioxidant activity of
pomegranate peel extracts in vivo models. J Agric Food Chem 50, 2002, pp
4791-4795.
205. Jassim, S.A.A. Antiviral or antifungal composition comprising an extract of
pomegranate rind or other plants and method of use. U.S. Patent 5840308,
1998.
206. Braga, L.C, Shupp, J.W, Cummings, C, Jett, M; Takahashi, J.A, Carmo, L.S,
Chartone- Souza, E, Nascimento, A. M. Pomegranate extract inhibits
Staphylococcus aureus growth and subsequent enterotoxin production. J
Ethnopharmacol 96, 2005, pp 335-339.
88
207. Zhang, J, Zhan, B, Yao, X and Song, J. Antiviral activity of tannin from the
pericarp of Punica granatum L. against genital herpes virus in vitro.
Zhongguo Zhongyao Zazhi 20, 1995, pp 556-558.
208. Abegunde, A. and F.D. Adu. Areca nut extract suppresses T-cell activation
and interferon-gamma production via the induction of oxidative stress. Food
Chem. Toxicol., 45: 2007, pp 1410-1418.
209. Ohsugi, M, Fan, W, Hase,K, Xiong Q, Tezuka, Y, and Komatsu, K. Active-
oxygen scavenging activity of traditional nourishing tonic activity of herbal
medicines and active constituents of Rhodiolasacra. J Ethnopharmacol 67,
1999, pp 111-119.
210. Reijiro, U, Toshiharu, M, Masaya, I, Yasuhiro, T and Akira, F, New 5-
nucleotidase inhibitors NPF-861 A, NPF-861-B, NPF-86 A and NPF-86 B
from Areca catechu. Part: Isolation and biological properties, Planta Medica,
54, 1988, pp 419-422.
211. Okuda, T. Yoshida, T. and Hatano. New methods of analyzing tannins. J Nat
Products, 52, 1989, pp 1-31.
212. Lee S.E. Hwang, H.J., Ha, J.S. Jeong, H.S., and Kim, J.H. Screening of
medicinal plant extracts for antioxidant activity Life Sciences, 73, 2003, pp
167-179.
213. Patel R.S and Rajorhia G.S. Antioxidative role of curry (Murraya koenigi) and
Betel (Piper betel) leaves in ghee. J Food Sci Technol 16, 1979, pp 158-160.
214. Rao and Ramalakshmi. Antioxidant and radical scavenging carbozole
alkaloids from the oleoresin of curry leaves (Murrayya koenigi Spreng) Food
Chem 100, 2007, pp 742-747.
89
215. Arulselvan P, Senthilkumar GP, Sathish Kumar D and Subramanian S. Anti-
diabetic effect of Murraya koenigii leaves on streptozotocin induced diabetic
rats. Pharmazie 61(10), 2006, pp 874–877.
216. Arulselvan P and Subramanian SP. Beneficial effects of Murraya koenigii
leaves on antioxidant defense system and ultra structural changes of pancreatic
beta-cells in experimental diabetes in rats. Chem Biol Interact. 165 (2), 2007,
pp 155–164.
217. Parker TD, Adams DA, Zhou K, Harris M, Yu L. Fatty acid composition and
oxidative stability of cold-pressed edible seed oils. J Food Sci 68: 2003, pp
1240–1243.
218. Martin-Polvillo M, Marquez-Ruiz G, Dobarganes MC. Oxidative stability of
sunflower oils differing in unsaturation degree during long-term storage at
room temperature. J Am Oil Chem Soc 81, 2004, pp 577–583.
219. Jung MY, Yoon SH and Min DB. Effects of processing steps on the contents
of minor compounds, and oxidation stability of soybean oil. J Am Oil Chem
Soc 66, 1989, pp 118–120.
220. Eskin, N.A.M and Przbylski, R. Antioxidant and Shelf Life of Foods. In:
Eskin, N.A.M. and Robinson, D.S. (Eds). Food Shelf Life Stability: Chemical,
Biochemical and Microbiological Changes. Boca Raton, Fla: CRC Press.
2001, pp 175-209.
221. Suzuki, Y, Yasui, T. Matsukura, U and Terao, J. Oxidative stability of bran
lipids from rice variety (Oryza sativa L) lacking lipoxigenase-3 in seeds, J
Agric Food Chem 43, 1996, pp 3479-3483.
90
222. Naz, S, Sheikh, H, Siddiqi, R. and Sayeed S.A. Oxidative stability of olive,
corn and soybean oil under different conditions. Food Chem 88, 2004, pp 253-
259.
223. Abdalla, A.E, Tirzite, D, Tirzitis, G and Roozen, J.P. Antioxidant activity of 1,
4-dihydropyridine derivatives in β-carotene-methyl linoleate, sunflower oil
and emulsions. Food Chem 66, 1999, pp 189-195.
224. Catsberg, C.M.E. and Kempen-Van Dommelen, G.J.M. Food Handbook.
England: Ellis Horwood Limited. 1990, pp. 176-181.
225. McWilliams, M. Foods: Experimental Perspectives. 3rd Ed. New Jersey:
Prentice-Hall, Inc. 1997, pp 273-290.
226. Madhavi, D.L., Deshpande, S.S. and Salunkhe, D.K. Food Antioxidants:
Technological, Toxicological and Health perspectives. New York: Marcel
Dekker, Inc. 1996, pp 2-7.
227. Stauffer, C.E. Fats and Oils, Minnesto, USA Eagan Press, 1996, pp 1-14.
228. Chu, Y. and Kung Y, A study on vegetable oil blends. Food Chem 62, 1998,
pp 191-195.
229. Koelsch, C.M., Downes, T.W. and Labuza T.P. Hexanal formation via lipid
oxidation as a function of oxygen concentration: Measurement and kinetics. J
Food Sci 56, 1991, pp 816-819.
230. Tan, C.P, Che Man, Y.B. Selemat, J and Yusoff, M.S.A. Comparative studies
of oxidative stability of edible oils by differential scanning Calorimetry and
oxidative stability index methods. Food Chem 76, 2002, pp 385-389
91
231. Guillen, M.D and Cabo, N. Fourier transform infrared spectral data versus
peroxide and anisidine values to determine oxidative stability of edible oils,
Food Chem 77, 2002, pp 503-520.
232. Che, Y and Hsu, H. Effect of antioxidants on peanut oil stability. Food Chem
66, 1999, pp 29-34.
233. Rudnik, E, Szczucinska, A, Gwardiac, H, Szulk, A and Winiarska, A.
Comparative studies of oxidative study of linseed oil. Thermochimica Acta,
370, 2001, pp 135-140.
234. Abou-Gharbia, H.A, Shehata, A. A.Y and Shahidi, F. Effect of processing on
oxidative stability and lipid classes of sesame oil. Food Res Intern 33, 2000,
pp 331-340.
235. Yusuf Ali Khan R, Lakshminarayana T, Azeemoddin G, Atchyuta Ramayya D
and Thirumala Rao SD. Shelf life of sunflower oil and ground nut oil. J Food
Sci Technol 16, 1979, p 90
236. Warner, K., Frankel, E.N. and Mounts, T.L. Flavour and oxidative stability of
soybean, sunflower and low erucic acid rapeseed oils. J Am Oil Chem Soc 66,
1989, pp 558-564.
237. Yang, G.C, Quiang, W, Morehouse, K.M, Rosenthal, I, Ku, Y and Yurawecz,
P. Determination of hydroperoxides in edible oils by electron spin resonance,
thiobarbituric acid assay and liquid chromatography-chemiluminescence
techniques, J Agric Food Chem 39, 1991, pp 896-898.
238. O’Brien, R.D. Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications. 2nd
Ed. London: CRC Press. 2004, pp 192-199.