2000-09-2 ieee 802.16.3-00/02r4 project ieee...
TRANSCRIPT
2000-09-26 IEEE 802.16.3-00/02r4
i
Project IEEE 802.16 Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <http://ieee802.org/16>
Title Functional Requirements for the 802.16.3 Interoperability Standard
DateSubmitted
2000-09-22
Source(s) Brian Petry (editor)3Com12230 World Trade Dr.San Diego, CA 92128
Voice: 858-674-8533mailto:[email protected]
Re: This document represents a collaborative effort by the 802.16.3 Functional Requirements Task Group that started from a contribution by George Fishel (based on the 802.16.1Functional Requirements [IEEE 802.16s-99/00r1]) and was further revised by the TaskGroup by a formal comment/resolution process. The version you are reading has been accepted by the Task Group. Please confirm that you are reading the most recent publishedversion of this document (802.16.3-00/02rx where x is the version number) which can be foundat: http://ieee802.org/16/sub11/docs/802163-00_02.html
This document is output from 802.16 Session #9 (12-15 September, 2000). It contains edits thathave been reviewed and resolved by the 802.16.3 Task Group at Session #9.
Abstract This document provides functional requirements that are guidelines for developing aninteroperable 802.16.3 air interface. The 802.16.3 committee desired to reach an understandingand consensus for functional requirements before proceeding with developing standards for802.16.3 MAC and PHY protocols and thus formed a Functional Requirements Task Group toproduce this document.
Purpose The 802.16.3 task group uses this document to help qualify MAC and PHY protocol proposals.
Notice This document has been prepared to assist IEEE 802.16. It is offered as a basis for discussionand is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in thisdocument is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s)reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.
Release The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate text contained in thiscontribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; tocopyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may includeportions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce inwhole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledgesand accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802.16.
PatentPolicy andProcedures
The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802.16 Patent Policy and Procedures (Version 1.0)<http://ieee802.org/16/ipr/patents/policy.html>, including the statement “IEEE standards may include the known use ofpatent(s), including patent applications, if there is technical justification in the opinion of the standards-developing committeeand provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder that it will license applicants under reasonable terms andconditions for the purpose of implementing the standard.”
Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce thepossibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved forpublication. Please notify the Chair <mailto:[email protected]> as early as possible, in written or electronic form, of anypatents (granted or under application) that may cover technology that is under consideration by or has been approved by IEEE802.16. The Chair will disclose this notification via the IEEE 802.16 web site<http://ieee802.org/16/ipr/patents/notices>.
2000-09-26 IEEE 802.16.3-00/02r4
ii
AcknowledgementsGeorge Fishel provided the first draft of this document, based on the 802.16.1 FunctionalRequirements, 802.16s-99/00r1.
The following people have also contributed by submitting comments on previous versions:
Reza Arefi
Jose Costa
Adnan Abu-Dayya
Avi Freedman
Marianna Goldhammer
Leif Jansson
Mika Kasslin
Demosthenes Kostas
Adi Nativ
Uzi Padan
Brian Petry
Moshe Ran
Durga Satapathy
David Trinkwon
Muya Wachira
Nico van Waes
2000-09-26 IEEE 802.16.3-00/02r4
iii
Revision History
ReleaseDate
DocumentNumber
Author Change summary
2000-03-02 802.16.3-00/02r0 George Fishel First Draft; based on 802.16.1 functional requirements,802.16s-99/00r1
2000-04-29 802.16.3-00/02r1 Brian Petry (editor) With red-lined, unapproved changes specified bycommentors
2000-06-23 802.16.3-00/02r2 Brian Petry (editor) With changes approved by task group at 802.16 session #7
2000-08-07 802.16.3-00/02r3 Brian Petry (editor) With changes approved by task group at 802.16 session #8
2000-09-26 802.16.3-00/02r4 Brian Petry (editor) With changes approved by task group at 802.16 session #9.This version was accepted by the task group.
2000-09-26 IEEE 802.16.3-00/02r4
iv
Functional Requirements for the 802.16.3 InteroperabilityStandard
Brian Petry (editor)
Table of ContentsACKNOWLEDGEMENTS...............................................................................................................................II
REVISION HISTORY .................................................................................................................................... III
1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................1
1.1 SCOPE....................................................................................................................................................11.2 TARGET MARKETS.................................................................................................................................3
2 802.16.3 SYSTEM MODEL........................................................................................................................3
2.1 WIRELESS ACCESS REFERENCE MODEL...................................................................................................52.2 OPTIONAL REPEATER FUNCTION.............................................................................................................52.3 TOPOLOGY.............................................................................................................................................5
3 SUPPORTED SERVICE CAPABILITIES ................................................................................................5
3.1 VOICE TRANSPORT SERVICE CAPABILITIES..............................................................................................63.2 DATA TRANSPORT SERVICE CAPABILITIES – INTERNET............................................................................63.3 BRIDGED LAN SERVICE CAPABILITIES....................................................................................................63.4 OTHER SERVICES....................................................................................................................................6
4 802.16.3 PROTOCOLS...............................................................................................................................6
5 PERFORMANCE AND CAPACITY .........................................................................................................8
5.1 SCALABILITY .........................................................................................................................................85.2 PEAK DATA RATE ..................................................................................................................................85.3 PROPAGATION DELAY ............................................................................................................................85.4 SPECTRAL EFFICIENCY ...........................................................................................................................8
A.1.1 Per-Subscriber Rate Adaptation.....................................................................................................85.5 FLEXIBLE ASYMMETRY ..........................................................................................................................85.6 RADIO LINK AVAILABILITY ....................................................................................................................95.7 RADIO LINK ERROR PERFORMANCE........................................................................................................95.8 DELAY ...................................................................................................................................................95.9 CAPACITY ............................................................................................................................................10
6 WIRELESS MEDIA CHARACTERISTICS ............................................................................................10
6.1 DUPLEX MODES...................................................................................................................................106.2 CHANNELIZATION ................................................................................................................................11
7 CLASS OF SERVICE AND QUALITY OF SERVICE ...........................................................................11
7.1 TYPES AND CLASSES OF SERVICE..........................................................................................................117.2 PARAMETERS.......................................................................................................................................127.3 SERVICE QOS MAPPINGS......................................................................................................................12
8 MANAGEMENT ......................................................................................................................................12
8.1 SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENTS..............................................................................................................138.2 MALFUNCTIONING SUBSCRIBER STATION OR BASE STATION..................................................................138.3 ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING................................................................................................................13
9 SECURITY................................................................................................................................................13
9.1 AUTHENTICATION ................................................................................................................................139.2 AUTHORIZATION ..................................................................................................................................149.3 PRIVACY ..............................................................................................................................................14
2000-09-26 IEEE 802.16.3-00/02r4
v
10 802 CONFORMANCE..........................................................................................................................14
APPENDIX .......................................................................................................................................................16
A REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY (INFORMATIVE) ................................................................................16
A.1 MANDATORY .......................................................................................................................................16A.2 RECOMMENDED (R)..............................................................................................................................19A.3 OPTIONAL (O)......................................................................................................................................21
B VOCABULARY OF TERMS (NORMATIVE) ........................................................................................23
B.1 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS.........................................................................................................29
C REFERENCES..........................................................................................................................................31
2000-09-26 IEEE 802.16.3-00/02r4
1
1 Introduction1
This document provides functional requirements that are guidelines for developing an2interoperable 802.16.3 air interface for the licensed microwave frequency bands between 2 and311 GHz enabling Point to Multipoint (P-MP) Broadband Wireless Access (BWA). The BWA4system provides packet-based transport capabilities that can support a wide range of services5(e.g., data, voice and video) to residential, Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) and Small6Office/Home Office (SOHO) locations. The 802.16.3 committee desired to reach an7understanding and consensus for functional requirements before proceeding with developing8standards for 802.16.3 MAC and PHY protocols and thus formed a System Requirements Task9Group to produce this document.10
For convenience, requirements are itemized in Appendix A.11
The Functional Requirements will not be published or sold by the IEEE. The requirements,12with possible future amendments, are binding to the future development of 802.16.3 air13interface protocols. This means that the forthcoming air interface standard MUST comply with14the functional requirements.15
Throughout this document, the words that are used to define the significance of particular16requirements are capitalized. These words are:17
“MUST” or “SHALL” These words or the adjective "REQUIRED" means that the item is an18absolute requirement.19
“MUST NOT” This phrase means that the item is an absolute prohibition.20
“SHOULD” This word or the adjective “RECOMMENDED” means that there may exist valid21reasons in particular circumstances to ignore this item, but the full implications should be22understood and the case carefully weighed before choosing a different course.23
“SHOULD NOT” This phrase means that there may exist valid reasons in particular24circumstances when the listed behavior is acceptable or even useful, but the full implications25should be understood and the case carefully weighed before implementing any behavior26described with this label.27
“MAY” This word or the adjective “OPTIONAL” means that this item is truly optional. One28implementation may include the item because the target marketplace requires it or because it29enhances the product, for example; another implementation may omit the same item.30
1.1 Scope31
For the purposes of this document, a “system” constitutes an 802.16.3 MAC and PHY32implementation in which at least one subscriber station communicates with a base station via a33point-to-multipoint (P-MP) radio air interface, the interfaces to external networks, and services34supported by the MAC and PHY protocol layers. So, “functional requirements” describes the35functions of typical systems in terms of how they affect requirements of interoperable 802.16.336MAC and PHY protocols. The functional requirements describe 802.16.3 systems and37requirements in broad terms: what the required functions are but not how these functions work.38The how part is left to the forthcoming 802.16.3 interoperability standard [1] which will39describe in detail the interfaces, functions and procedures of the MAC and PHY protocols.40
This document focuses on the service capabilities that an 802.16.3 system is required to support.41These service capabilities have a direct impact on the requirements of the 802.16.3 MAC and42PHY protocols. When the 802.16 working group produces an interoperable air interface43
2000-09-26 IEEE 802.16.3-00/02r4
2
standard that meets these functional requirements, resulting 802.16.3-based implementations1will provide the services required to interface into many conceivable BWA systems.2
Other goals of this document are to formulate reference models and terminology for both3network topology and protocol stacks that help the 802.16 working group to discuss and4develop the MAC and PHY protocols. As far as possible, these SHOULD be common across5802.16 systems.6
802.
10 S
EC
UR
ITY
802
OV
ER
VIE
W &
AR
CH
ITE
CT
UR
E
802.
1 M
AN
AG
EM
EN
T
802.2 LOGICAL LINK CONTROL
OT
HE
R
UP
PE
R L
AYE
RS
802.1 BRIDGIN G DATALINK
LAYER
PHYSICALLAYER
802.16.3MEDIUMACCESS
802.16.3PHYSICAL802.[3,4,5,6...]
PHYSICAL
802.[3,4,5,6...]MEDIUMACCESS ...
7
Figure 1-1: Relationship between 802.16.3 and other Protocol Standards (the numbers8in the figure refer to IEEE standard numbers)9
The 802.16.3 air interface interoperability standard SHALL be part of a family of standards for10local, metropolitan and wide area networks. The 802.16.3 protocols relate to other 80211standards and to the OSI model as shown in Figure 1-1.12
This family of standards deals with the Physical and Data Link layers as defined by the13International Organization for Standardization (ISO) Open Systems Interconnection Basic14Reference Model (ISO 7498: 1984). The access standards define several types of medium15access technologies and associated physical media, each appropriate for particular applications16or system objectives. Other physical layers and medium access types are under investigation.17
The standards that define the services noted in the above diagram are as follows:18
IEEE Std 802: Overview and Architecture. This standard provides an overview to the family of19IEEE 802 Standards. This document forms part of the 802.1 scope of work.20
ANSI/IEEE Std 802.1B [ISO/IEC 15802-2]: LAN/MAN Management. Defines an Open21Systems Interconnection (OSI) management-compatible architecture, environment for22performing remote management.23
ANSI/IEEE Std 802.1D [ISO/IEC 10038]: MAC Bridging. Specifies an architecture and24protocol for the interconnection of IEEE 802 LANs below the MAC service boundary.25
2000-09-26 IEEE 802.16.3-00/02r4
3
ANSI/IEEE Std 802.1E [ISO/IEC 15802-4]: System Load Protocol. Specifies a set of services1and protocols for those aspects of management concerned with the loading of systems on IEEE2802 LANs.3
ANSI/IEEE Std 802.2 [ISO/IEC 8802-2]: Logical Link Control.4
ANSI/IEEE Std 802.3 [ISO/IEC 8802-3]: CSMA/CD Access Method and Physical Layer5Specifications.6
ANSI/IEEE Std 802.4 [ISO/IEC 8802-4]: Token Bus Access Method and Physical Layer7Specifications.8
IEEE Std 802.10: Interoperable LAN/MAN Security, Secure Data Exchange (SDE).9
1.2 Target Markets10
The target markets described in this section are not an exhaustive set, but serve as guidelines11and examples that suffice for meeting the broad applicability goals set forth by the air interface12“Five Criteria” as described in the IEEE 802.16.3 Project Authorization Request (PAR) and13“Five Criteria” [1, 2].14
A broadband wireless access (BWA) system based on 802.16.3 protocols is expected to address15markets similar to those of certain wired access technologies such as:16
� Copper digital subscriber line (xDSL) technologies17
� Digital cable TV hybrid fiber/coax (HFC) networks18
� Fiber Access Networks19
� Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN)20
� The services that such legacy systems carry: data, voice and audio/video2122
The critical parameters for serving these markets using wireless access technology is the23combination of coverage / capacity factors that affects access cost per user, the deployability,24maintainability and product costs associated with the customer premise installation, and the25spectrum efficiency / reuse for economically serving the required number of customer locations26with a minimum number of base station locations and backhaul routes.27
The target markets to be addressed by the 802.16.3 protocols in BWA networks are single28family residential, SOHO, small businesses and multi-tenant dwellings.29
In accordance with ITU-R [3] definitions, Fixed Wireless Access (FWA) (and hence BWA)30provides access to one or more (public and private) core networks, rather than forming an end-31to-end communication system. 802.16.3 systems serve fixed location customers, but who might32be geographically fixed, re-locatable or nomadic (but not mobile).33
2 802.16.3 System Model34
This section presents a high level description of a system model to be used as a framework for35developing 802.16.3 standards. The model identifies of the main features of an 802.16.336system, and the terminology to be used by the 802.16-working group in the creation of the37standards.38
As mentioned in section 1.1, an 802.16.3 “system” constitutes an 802.16.3 MAC and PHY39implementation in which at least one subscriber station communicates with a base station via a40point-to-multipoint (P-MP) radio air interface, and services supported by the MAC and PHY41protocol layers. Specific applications of the 802.16.3 point-to-multipoint (P-MP) radios are42
2000-09-26 IEEE 802.16.3-00/02r4
4
generally applicable to the range 2 to 11 GHz. Radio communications in the above range may1be possible in near- and non-line-of-sight situations between a base station and subscriber2station. Operation may include partial blockage by foliage which contributes to signal3attenuation and multipath effects. Figure 2-1 shows an example deployment configuration4including the optional use of a repeater. 802.16.3 systems SHALL be deployable in multiple-5cell frequency reuse systems and single cell (super cell) frequency reuse systems. The range of6802.16.3 radios varies with transmit power, channel characteristics, availability requirement,7local regulations and atmospheric conditions.8
9
Figure 2-1: Example Deployment Configuration10
To facilitate description, an 802.16.3 system consists of one base station radio and one or more11subscriber stations. Thus, an 802.16.3 system also defines 802.16.3 base station and subscriber12station radios that communicate using the 802.16.3 MAC and PHY protocols. The base station13radio SHALL be P-MP, radiating its downstream signal with a shaped sector or adaptive array14(spatial reuse) antenna achieving broad azimuthal beam width to “cover” a prospective number15of subscribers.16
Furthermore, the 802.16.3 system does not define radio communications between base stations.17Since the base station radios might be “sector oriented,” multiple base station radios will likely,18in practice, be co-located (subject to frequency re-use requirements), and might share physical19hardware.20
The frequency bands used by 802.16.3 systems vary among governed geographies [4].21
2000-09-26 IEEE 802.16.3-00/02r4
5
2.1 Wireless Access Reference Model1
Figure 2-2 shows the 802.16.3 wireless access reference model. The model depicts the relevant2points between subscriber networks and “core” networks (the networks that MAY be accessed3via 802.16.3 air interface). A greater system encompassing user terminals, base station4interconnection networks, network management facilities, etc. may be envisaged but the5802.16.3 protocol focuses on the air interface shown in the model. The Core Network Interface6(CNI) and the User Network Interface (UNI) are also shown.7
A single SS MAY support multiple customer premises networks that transport data, voice and8video through one or more UNIs. Base stations MAY support multiple core networks through9one or more CNIs. For the purposes of 802.16.3, the UNI and CNI are abstract concepts. The10details of these interfaces are beyond the scope of this document. The standard SHALL specify11MAC layer protocols and PHY transmission techniques suitable for providing access between12one or more subscriber stations and base stations to support UNI and CNI requirements.13
R F
U N IR es iden tia l
o r S M EU ser
E qu ipm ent
S SC N I
Pub lic o rP riva teC ore
N e tw o rks
B S
A : A ir In te rfaceS S : S ub sc ribe r S tationB S : B ase S ta tionU N I: U se r N e tw ork In terfaceC N I: C ore N e tw ork In terfaceR F : R epeater Func tion (op tional)
A
A A
14
Figure 2-2: Wireless Access Reference Model15
2.2 Optional Repeater Function16
The 802.16.3 protocols SHALL support the optional deployment of repeater functions. The17repeater function SHALL NOT affect the MAC protocol other than the delay which the repeater18might introduce into the system. The repeater function SHOULD NOT affect the end-to-end19operation of 802.16.3 protocols between BS and SS.20
2.3 Topology21
Since all data traffic in a single cell of an 802.16.3 network MUST go through the base station,22that station SHALL serve as a radio resource supervisor [5].23
In the downstream direction, the multiplexed traffic is transmitted by the base station. In the24upstream direction, 802.16.3 protocols MUST provide the means to multiplex traffic from25multiple subscriber stations, resolve contention, and allocate capacity.26
3 Supported Service Capabilities27
This section describes typical service capabilities supported by an 802.16.3 air interface.28
The MAC and PHY protocols will not have explicit support for each and every service, due to29the fact that generic data streams SHALL be used for transport. The MAC and PHY protocols30SHALL provide for QoS service specific support, resulting in appropriate BER for data31services, limited delay for real time services, etc.32
2000-09-26 IEEE 802.16.3-00/02r4
6
3.1 Voice Transport Service Capabilities1
802.16.3 systems SHALL support voice communications for subscribers in a way that eases the2migration of legacy voice communications equipment and public switched telephone network3(PSTN) access technologies to 802.16.3 systems. The 802.16.3 voice access transport SHALL4be packet based (as opposed to circuit-switched based).5
3.2 Data Transport Service Capabilities – Internet6
The 802.16.3 system MUST directly transport variable-length IP datagrams efficiently. Both IP7versions 4 and 6 MUST be supported. For efficient transport of IPv6, TCP/IP header8compression over the air interface SHOULD be supported. The 802.16.3 IP service MUST9provide support for real-time and non-real-time service capabilities. It SHOULD be possible to10support the emerging IP Quality of Service (QoS) efforts: Differentiated Services [6, 7] and11Integrated Services [8].12
3.3 Bridged LAN Service Capabilities13
The 802.16.3 protocols SHOULD support bridged LAN service capabilities, whether directly or14indirectly, including always on, ad hoc and on-demand communication in either or both15directions.16
3.4 Other Services17
Other services that for instance require QoS-based delivery of the MAC services may be added.18These services SHALL NOT place any additional requirements on 802.16.3 systems (MAC and19PHY protocols) not already covered in the above sections.20
4 802.16.3 Protocols21
The 802.16.3 protocols determine the interoperability of multiple vendors' equipment. Protocol22interoperability occurs at each level in the protocol “stack” [9]. In this section, services refer to23the services provided by the protocols that can appear in the layer sitting directly over the MAC24layer. IEEE 802 protocols reside at layer 1 and 2 and consist primarily of Logical Link Control25(802.2) [10] and the various MAC and PHY layers for each LAN or MAN standard. The IEEE26Std 802-1990 Overview and Architecture [11] describes these layers.27
The 802.16.3 protocol stack reference diagram is shown in Figure 4-1. In addition to the LLC,28MAC and PHY layers suggested by the generic 802 architectures [11] [12] [13], 802.16.329protocols support other categories of “upper protocols” that correspond to the requirements of30the service capabilities described in section 3.31
2000-09-26 IEEE 802.16.3-00/02r4
7
APPLICATION
PRESENTATION
SESSION
TRA NSPORT
NETWORK
DATA LINK
PHYSICAL
802.16.3PHY
802.16.3MAC
MAC TC
PMD
MAC
LLC(conver g ence la y er )
(conver g ence la y er )
LLC
1
Figure 4-1: Protocol Stack Reference Model2
This protocol stack reference model is intended to help develop terminology, and possibly3protocol architecture. Each of the protocols above the PHY and MAC support “convergence4sub-layers.” The convergence sub-layers [14] [15] may be necessary to:5
� Encapsulate PDU framing of upper layers into the native 802.16.3 MAC/PHY PDUs [15]6
� Map an upper layer’s addresses into 802.16.3 addresses7
� Translate upper layer CoS/QoS parameters into native 802.16.3 MAC constructs8
� Adapt the asynchronous, synchronous or isochronous data pattern of the upper layer into the9equivalent MAC service10
� Reduce the need for complex inter-working functions (IWFs) [15]1112
Other convergence sub-layers may be required by additional higher layer service requirements.13
The IEEE 802.16.3 MAC and PHY protocol stacks SHALL be the same for all the supported14services. The central purpose of the MAC protocol layer in 802.16.3 is sharing of radio channel15resources. The MAC protocol defines how and when a base station or subscriber station may16initiate transmission on the channel. Since key layers above the MAC require service17guarantees, the MAC protocol MUST define interfaces and procedures to provide guaranteed18service to the upper layers. Since customer units will contend for capacity to/from one or more19base stations, the MAC protocol MUST efficiently resolve contention and resource allocation.20Note that the function of the MAC protocols SHOULD include error correction by21retransmission, or Automatic Repeat Request (ARQ), whereas, in the 802 model, those22functions if necessary, are provided by the LLC layer.23
The PHY layer is similarly subdivided between a convergence layer and a physical medium-24dependent (PMD) layer. The PMD is the “main” part of the PHY. Like the MAC convergence25layers, the PHY convergence layers adapt/map the “special” needs of the MAC services to26generic PMD services. Further details, and finalization of the protocol reference model,27SHALL be worked out by the 802.16.3 MAC and PHY task groups while developing the air28interface interoperability standard.29
2000-09-26 IEEE 802.16.3-00/02r4
8
5 Performance and Capacity1
This section addresses some issues regarding 802.16.3 system performance and capacity.2Specifying protocols that can maintain specified/mandatory performance levels in the face of3fluctuating and diverse channel characteristics (e.g., due to multipath and atmospheric4conditions) is a problem that the 802.16.3 work group has to consider. This section specifies the5target performance levels. This section also outlines some of the issues for 802.16.3 capacity6planning.7
Note that ITU-R has presented several questions regarding the need for performance objectives8for fixed wireless access radio systems, in particular, the activities being carried out within the9Joint Rapporteur Group (JRG) 8A/9B (Questions ITU-R 140/9, ITU-R 215/8, ITU-R 220/9).10
5.1 Scalability11
The 802.16.3 protocols SHOULD allow for different “scales” of capacity and performance for12802.16.3 system instances.13
5.2 Peak Data Rate14
802.16.3 protocols SHALL be optimized to support the peak data rate in either or both15directions to a subscriber station within the specified distance from the base station. The16802.16.3 MAC protocol SHOULD allow the peak data rate to scale beyond 10 Mbps.17
5.3 Propagation Delay18
The large cell radius, up to 50km, will produce a large propagation delay difference between19near and far CPE units. This difference can be as large as 150us. The PHY and MAC protocol20SHOULD provide for far CPEs’ propagation delay compensation.21
5.4 Spectral Efficiency22
The spectral efficiency is an important performance parameter of a wireless access system.23
A.1.1 Per-Subscriber Rate Adaptation24
802.16.3 systems can use different modulation and/or coding options for far and near subscriber25stations. In this way the data rate to/from relatively near subscribers can be higher, increasing26the overall system capacity. Additionally, far subscribers can experience different interference27profiles and so would benefit from rate adaptation. The PHY and MAC protocols SHALL28provide for multirate support.29
5.5 Flexible Asymmetry30
802.16.3 protocols SHOULD allow for flexibility between delivered upstream and downstream31capacity and CoS/QoS. Some target markets utilize naturally asymmetrical capacity, such as for32generic Internet access where most of the capacity is consumed in the downstream direction.33Some markets utilize asymmetrical capacity, using more in the upstream direction, such as a34video multicast from a corporate or distance-learning source. Other markets and applications35require symmetrical capacity, such as telephony and video conferencing [15].36
2000-09-26 IEEE 802.16.3-00/02r4
9
A high degree of flexibility may be achieved by utilizing the MAC protocol to arbitrate channel1capacity in either direction, upstream or downstream.2
5.6 Radio Link Availability3
An 802.16.3 system SHOULD be available to transport all services at better than their required4maximum error rates (see section 5.7) from about 99.9 to 99.99% of the time [14, 16], assuming5that the system and radios receive adequate mains power 100% of the time and not counting6equipment availability. The 802.16.3 specifications SHALL NOT preclude the ability of the7radio link to be engineered for different link availabilities, based on the preference of the system8operator.9
A period of unavailable time begins at the onset of ten consecutive SES events based on the10following definitions [17].11
� Severely Errored Second (SES) is defined as a one-second period which contains 30%12errored blocks.13
� Errored Block (EB): A block is defined as a set of consecutive bits associated with the path.14Consecutive bits may not be contiguous in time. A block is typified as data block15containing an error detection code for service performance monitoring. An errored block is16a block in which one or more bits are in error.17
18It is expected that the highest contributor to 802.16.3 system outage will be excessive19attenuation and multipath due to varying path impediments such as reflections and foliage. In a20multicell environment, intercell interference can not be neglected as an outage increasing factor.21802.16.3 MAC and PHY protocols MUST accommodate these conditions, perhaps consuming22more radio bandwidth and/or requiring smaller radio propagation distance (radius) to meet the23availability requirements. Since statistical atmospheric and path conditions vary widely in24geography, the 802.16.3 protocols MUST be flexible in consumed radio bandwidth (spectral25efficiency), cell radius, and transmit power. Bandwidth and cell radius are critical components26of system/cell capacity planning (also see section 5.9).27
802.16.3 MAC and PHY protocols SHOULD specify functions and procedures to adjust28transmitter power, modulation, or other parameters to accommodate rapid changes in channel29characteristics.30
5.7 Radio Link Error Performance31
The error rate, after application of the appropriate error correction mechanism (e.g., FEC),32delivered by the PHY layer to the MAC layer SHALL meet IEEE 802 functional requirements33with the following exception: the radio link bit error ratio (BER) SHALL be 10E-6 (in34accordance with ITU FWA recommendations [18] or better. Note that this BER of the35recovered payload applies to a BWA system which is only one component of a network’s end-36to-end BER. Note that the size of the data block is TBD.37
5.8 Delay38
Delay and variation of delay, or jitter, are important factors to consider. For example, a high39variation of delay can severely impact telephony services. However, generic Internet access can40tolerate a high degree of delay variation.41
2000-09-26 IEEE 802.16.3-00/02r4
10
The end-to-end delay depends on an entire application-specific network encompassing all 71layers of the OSI model.2
Please refer to section 7, descriptions of QoS parameters.3
5.9 Capacity4
802.16.3 base station capacity requirement is defined as the product of the number of5subscribers, their peak bandwidth requirements and load factor based on quality of service6guarantees. The standard SHALL support careful planning to ensure that subscribers’ quality of7service guarantees and minimum error rates are met.8
The delivered base station capacity can vary depending on attenuation due to atmospheric9conditions, LOS blockage, transmit power, etc., and SHALL be calculated as the aggregate10capacity of all sectors supported by a base station. Sector capacity is defined as the product of11two factors: the “modulation factor” and the “sector-bandwidth factor” based on quality of12service guarantees. The “modulation factor” is defined as the sector’s aggregate bit rate divided13by the bandwidth. The “sector-bandwidth factor” is defined as the total frequency band14available for the BWA service, adjusted by the appropriate frequency re-use factors. This15reflects mainly the factor of frequency reallocation and the ability to optimize frequency usage.16
Given the propagation characteristics in a given frequency band and geographic area, and the17development of a link budget [16], the following parameters of an 802.16.3 system SHOULD18be addressed by the MAC and PHY protocols:19
� Radio range (up to 50 Km)20
� Upstream/downstream channels’ data rates21
� Allocation of prospective subscriber data rate to channels. Note: the MAC and PHY22standards MAY allow subscribers to hop between channels23
� Types of modulation2425
The MAC and PHY protocols MUST accommodate channel capacity issues and changes in26channel capacity to meet contracted service levels with customers. For example, flexible27modulation types, power level adjustment, and bandwidth reservation schemes MAY be28employed. Also, as subscribers are added to 802.16.3 systems, the protocols MUST29accommodate them in an automated fashion.30
The time-variant impairments (multi-path interference) is expected to be the most significant31contributor to channel impairments and complexity in cell capacity planning [16,17, 19-26].32
6 Wireless Media Characteristics33
6.1 Duplex Modes34
This standard SHALL permit two duplex modes of operation: Frequency Division Duplex35(FDD) and Time Division Duplex (TDD). The PHY and MAC protocols MUST provide for36duplex (i.e. bi-directional) operation, while preserving the QoS, BER and spectral efficiency37requirements for data and voice traffic. The MAC and PHY protocols MUST provide means to38resolve applicable collocation and interference problems.39
2000-09-26 IEEE 802.16.3-00/02r4
11
6.2 Channelization1
The MAC and PHY protocols MUST permit the operation with channel spacing of 1.75, 3.5 and27MHz when using ETSI masks and 1.5 to 25MHz when using other masks. The typical value3for performance analysis SHOULD be 3.5MHz for the ETSI mask and 3MHz for the MDS4mask.5
7 Class of Service and Quality of Service6
This section describes the classes of service and quality of service for 802.16.3 systems.7Terminology is borrowed from the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF).8
802.16.3 protocols MUST support classes of service (CoS) with various quality of service9(QoS) guarantees to support the services that an 802.16.3 system MUST transport. Thus,10802.16.3 protocol standards MUST define interfaces and procedures that accommodate the11needs of the services with respect to allocation and prioritization of resources. Additionally,12802.16.3 protocols MUST provide the means to enforce QoS contracts and Service Level13Agreements. Table 1 provides a summary of the QoS requirements that the PHY and MAC14SHALL provide. Note that parameters in the table are measured between the MAC input at the15upper layer at the transmit station and the MAC output at the upper layer of the receiving station16for information transmission. For example, delay does not include setup time, link acquisition,17voice codecs, etc.18
For QoS-based, connectionless services, the 802.16.3 protocols MUST support resource19negotiation “on-demand”. For instance, the MAC protocol MAY allocate bursts of PDUs to20services that require changes in resource allocation. Such allocation, for connectionless21services, is thus performed in a semi-stateless manner.22
A connection-oriented service may require “state” information to be maintained for the life of a23connection. However, the 802.16.3 MAC layer interface MAY provide a connection-less24service interface that requires a higher-layer “adaptation” to maintain the “state” of a connection25and periodically allocate resources. For instance, the MAC may need to maintain “state”26information about a QoS data flow only for the duration of an allocation.27
Table 1: Services and QoS Requirements28
ServiceMaximum
Ratio
MaximumAccess
Delay (Oneway)
Full Quality Telephony (Vocoder MOS �
4.0)BER10-6 20 ms
Standard Quality Telephony (Vocoder MOS< 4.0)
BER10-4 40 ms
Time Critical Packet Services BER 10-6 20 msNon- Time Critical Services: BER 10-9 not applicable
29
7.1 Types and Classes of Service30
The fundamental direction for the QoS model that will be exported to the BWA endpoints will31be IP based and conform to IETF DiffServ QoS model in conjunction with other IP based32protocols. The DiffServ QoS model defines traffic for all services as follows:33
2000-09-26 IEEE 802.16.3-00/02r4
12
� Expedited forwarding (EF) EF requires a constant, periodic access to “bandwidth”. The1“bandwidth” requirements vary over time, within a specified range, but delay and delay2variance limits are specified. Examples that fall into this category are voice-over-IP (VoIP),3videoconferencing, video on demand (VoD), and other “multimedia” applications.4
� Assured Forwarding (AF): In AF the “bandwidth” varies within a specified range, but has5loose delay and delay variance requirements. Applications, which are limited in their6“bandwidth” usage, may fall into this category. In one example, corporate database7transactions could be relegated to this category. 'Assured Forwarding' service allows the8traffic to be divided into different classes. Using this service, an ISP can offer an9“Olympic” service model, which provides three tiers of services: gold, silver and bronze10with decreasing quality (i.e., the gold level of service receives a higher share of resources11than silver during times of congestion). This service model would support, for example, the12ability to provide preferential treatment to subscribers willing to pay a “premium” price for13better service. Or it would support more granular priorities such as giving preference to14VoIP traffic over other traffic e.g., HTTP).15
� Best Effort Service (BES). The “bandwidth” varies within a wide range, and is allowed to16burst up to the maximum link “bandwidth” when EF and AF traffic are not using17“bandwidth.” The “bandwidth” and delay requirements may or may not be specified.18Higher variations of delay may be tolerable since applications that fall into this category19allow for priority traffic to preempt their “bandwidth” consumption. “Bandwidth” is20delivered on a “best effort” basis. Current Internet service is an example of this type of21operation.22
7.2 Parameters23
802.16.3 protocols SHALL define a set of parameters that preserve the intent of QoS parameters24for IP-based services.25
7.3 Service QoS Mappings26
The classes of service and QoS parameters of services SHALL be translated into a common set27of parameters defined by 802.16.3. A QoS-based IP network may employ the Resource28Reservation Protocol (RSVP) [27] to “signal” the allocation of resources along a routed IP path.29If 802.16.3 is to be a “link” in the IP network, an IWF MUST interface with 802.16.3 to30negotiate resource allocation.31
The basic mechanism available within 802.16.3 systems for supporting QoS requirements is to32allocate bandwidth to various services. 802.16.3 protocols SHOULD include a mechanism that33can support dynamically-variable-bandwidth channels and paths (such as those defined for IP34environments).35
8 Management36
As outlined in IEEE Std 802-1990 [11], The LLC Sublayer, MAC Sublayer and Physical Layer37standards also include a management component that specifies managed objects and aspects of38the protocol machine that provide the management view of managed resources. The aspect of39management considered are (FCAPS):40
41
� Fault management42
� Configuration management43
2000-09-26 IEEE 802.16.3-00/02r4
13
� Accounting management1
� Performance management (see also section 5)2
� Security (see also section 9)34
The 802 standards define a framework for LAN/MAN management in ISO/IEC 15802-2:51995(E) [28]. The framework contains guidelines for managed objects, management protocol,6and the relationship to ITU management protocols. 802.16.3 protocols SHOULD comply with7the above-mentioned standards and guidelines.8
8.1 Service Level Agreements9
The 802.16.3 protocols MUST permit operators to enforce service level agreements (SLAs)10with subscribers by restricting access to the air link, discarding data, dynamically controlling11bandwidth available to a user or other appropriate means [29]. The 802.16.3 protocols MUST12also permit subscribers to monitor performance service levels of the 802.16.3 services being13provided at the delivery point.14
8.2 Malfunctioning Subscriber Station or Base Station15
The operator MUST have means to shut down and reactivate a subscriber station if necessary,16remote from the subscriber station, in the face of a malfunction. The operator also SHOULD17have the means to securely shut down and reactivate a base station remotely. When such18capabilities are available, the 802.16.3 protocols SHALL support a secure function. The19802.16.3 protocols SHOULD support functions that automatically shuts down transmission20from a subscriber station or base station in case of malfunction (e.g., power limits exceeded).21
8.3 Accounting and Auditing22
The 802.16.3 system management framework, architecture, protocols and managed objects23MUST allow for operators to effectively administer accounting and auditing. An operator24MUST be able to account for resource utilization and various service features for each25subscriber service separately.26
Also recall from section 2 that a single subscriber station can interface to multiple subscribers27that an operator could bill separately.28
9 Security29
The 802.16.3 system SHALL enforce security procedures described in this section.30
The security system chosen by 802.16.3 SHALL be added to the protocol stack and reference31points to include security protocols, and “database” servers for authentication, authorization,32key management, service suspend/resume, relocation, anti-cloning, etc. [30, 31].33
9.1 Authentication34
There are two types of authentication for an 802.16.3 system. In the first type, a subscriber35station MUST authenticate itself with the network every time it registers with the network. This36authentication MUST prevent unauthorized subscriber station from entering the network or an37unauthorized base station from emulating an authorized base station. This type of38authentication MUST be supported by the 802.16.3 MAC layer.39
2000-09-26 IEEE 802.16.3-00/02r4
14
The second type of authentication is between the subscriber and the BWA system. This may or1may not be the responsibility of the 802.16.3 protocols. It MAY be handled by higher layer2protocols.3
An additional level of authentication may exist between the other two. This additional layer is4the authentication of the subscriber with the subscriber station. This is beyond the scope of the5802.16.3 protocols.6
The authentication mechanisms MUST be secure so that an “enemy” subscriber station is not7able to gain access to an 802.16.3 system, or to the core network beyond. Passwords and secrets8MUST NOT be passed “in the clear” through the air interface.9
9.2 Authorization10
Authorization is a security process that determines what services an authenticated subscriber is11permitted to invoke. Each subscriber has a set of credentials that describe what the subscriber is12“allowed” to do. The 802.16.3 standard SHALL identify a standard set of credentials and allow13for vendors to extend the defined credentials with non-standard credentials. Some possible14credentials are:15
16
� Permission to access the 802.16.3 system17
� Permission to access certain services (IP, Remote Bridging, Digital Audio/Video, etc.)18
� Permission to request specific service features, and/or QoS parameters, based on the SLA19(resources, delay, etc.).20
21For each service offered, the 802.16.3 protocols MUST be capable of securely supporting22authorization requests and responses.23
9.3 Privacy24
Privacy is a security concept that protects transmitted data from being intercepted and25understood by third parties (e.g., an “enemy” subscriber station, base station or passively26“listening” radio). Wire-equivalent privacy (WEP) [5] and shared private key [5] privacy have27been suggested as minimum required privacy levels for 802.16.3 systems.28
802.16.3 standards SHOULD allow a suitable cryptographic algorithm to be employed that is29internationally applicable. Facilities SHOULD also be defined in the protocol for the use of30alternate cryptographic algorithms that can be used in certain localities and that can replace31algorithms as they are obsoleted or “legalized” for international use.32
10 802 Conformance33
802.16.3 SHOULD strive to fit into the 802 system model. Some particulars with the 80234model (see IEEE Standards for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks: Overview and35Architecture (IEEE Std 802-1990) [11]) are:36
2000-09-26 IEEE 802.16.3-00/02r4
15
� The 802.16.3 MAC supports 802 “universal” 48 bit addresses.1
� An 802.16.3 system supports MAC multicast. Note that 802.16.3 protocols support2multicast in the downstream direction only, not upstream.3
� The 802.16.3 protocols support 802.1 bridging services and protocols, including support of4the 802.1q virtual LAN tag and 802.1D priority ID [32-34].5
� The 802.16.3 protocols support encapsulation of 802.2 (LLC) [10] by the MAC protocol.6
� Conform to the 802 conventions and structures for “interface primitives:” logical structures7that are passed between protocol layers to invoke processes and transact data.8
� Address the 802 system management guidelines (see section 8) [35].9
� Provide a MAC service interface that complies to 802 conventions [12].1011
2000-09-26 IEEE 802.16.3-00/02r4
16
Appendix
A Requirements Summary (Informative)This section contains tabular summaries or requirements found in the text of this document.Requirements are separated into three categories: required, recommended and optional.
Each requirement is numbered for easy reference. Future revisions of this document will keepthe requirement reference numbers intact such that the number for a requirement will notchange from revision to revision.
To better discern the meaning and intent of a requirement, please refer to the text.
A.1 MandatoryIt is mandatory that the 802.16.3 standard support or specify the items in Table 2.
Table 2: Mandatory Requirements
# Section Requirement
M1 1 The forthcoming air interface standard MUST comply with the systemrequirements.
M2 1.1 The 802.16.3 air interface interoperability standard SHALL be part of a familyof standards for local, metropolitan and wide area networks.
M3 2 802.16.3 systems SHALL be deployable in multiple-cell frequency reusesystems and single cell (super cell) frequency reuse systems.
M4 2.3 Since all data traffic in a single cell of an 802.16.3 network MUST go throughthe base station, that station SHALL serve as a radio resource supervisor.
M5 2 The base station radio SHALL be P-MP, radiating its downstream signal witha shaped sector or adaptive array (spatial reuse) antenna achieving broadazimuthal beam width to “cover” a prospective number of subscribers.
M6 2.1 The standard SHALL specify MAC layer protocols and PHY transmissiontechniques suitable for providing access between one or more subscriberstations and base stations to support UNI and CNI requirements.
M7 2.2 The 802.16.3 protocols SHALL support the optional deployment of repeaterfunctions.
M8 2.2 The repeater function SHALL NOT affect the MAC protocol other than thedelay which the repeater might introduce into the system.
M9 2.3 In the upstream direction, 802.16.3 protocols MUST provide the means tomultiplex traffic from multiple subscriber stations, resolve contention, andallocate capacity.
M10 3 The MAC and PHY protocols will not have explicit support for each and everyservice, due to the fact that generic data streams SHALL be used for transport.
M11 3 The MAC and PHY protocols SHALL provide for QoS service specificsupport, resulting in appropriate BER for data services, limited delay for real
2000-09-26 IEEE 802.16.3-00/02r4
17
time services, etc.
M12 3.1 802.16.3 systems SHALL support voice communications for subscribers in away that eases the migration of legacy voice communications equipment andpublic switched telephone network (PSTN) access technologies to 802.16.3systems.
M13 3.1 The 802.16.3 voice access transport SHALL be packet based (as opposed tocircuit-switched based).
M14 3.2 The 802.16.3 system MUST directly transport variable-length IP datagramsefficiently.
M15 3.2 Both IP versions 4 and 6 MUST be supported.
M16 3.2 The 802.16.3 IP service MUST provide support for real-time and non-real-time service capabilities.
M17 3.4 These services SHALL NOT place any additional requirements on 802.16.3systems (MAC and PHY protocols) not already covered in the above sections.
M18 4 The IEEE 802.16.3 MAC and PHY protocol stacks SHALL be the same for allthe supported services.
M19 4 Further details, and finalization of the protocol reference model, SHALL beworked out by the 802.16.3 MAC and PHY task groups while developing theair interface interoperability standard.
M20 4 Since key layers above the MAC require service guarantees, the MAC protocolMUST define interfaces and procedures to provide guaranteed service to theupper layers.
M21 4 Since customer units will contend for capacity to/from one or more basestations, the MAC protocol MUST efficiently resolve contention and resourceallocation.
M22 5.2 802.16.3 protocols SHALL be optimized to support the peak data rate in eitheror both directions to a subscriber station within the specified distance from thebase station.
M23 5.4 The PHY and MAC protocols SHALL provide for multirate support.
M24 5.6 The 802.16.3 specifications SHALL NOT preclude the ability of the radio linkto be engineered for different link availabilities, based on the preference of thesystem operator.
M25 5.6 802.16.3 MAC and PHY protocols MUST accommodate these conditions,perhaps consuming more radio bandwidth and/or requiring smaller radiopropagation distance (radius) to meet the availability requirements.
M26 5.6 Since statistical atmospheric and path conditions vary widely in geography, the802.16.3 protocols MUST be flexible in consumed radio bandwidth (spectralefficiency), cell radius, and transmit power.
M27 5.7 The error rate, after application of the appropriate error correction mechanism(e.g., FEC), delivered by the PHY layer to the MAC layer SHALL meet IEEE802 functional requirements with the following exception: the radio link biterror ratio (BER) SHALL be 10E-6 (in accordance with ITU FWA
2000-09-26 IEEE 802.16.3-00/02r4
18
recommendations or better.
M28 5.9 The standard SHALL support careful planning to ensure that subscribers’quality of service guarantees and minimum error rates are met.
M29 5.9 The delivered base station capacity can vary depending on attenuation due toatmospheric conditions, LOS blockage, transmit power, etc., and SHALL becalculated as the aggregate capacity of all sectors supported by a base station.
M30 5.9 The MAC and PHY protocols MUST accommodate channel capacity issuesand changes in channel capacity to meet contracted service levels withcustomers.
M31 5.9 As subscribers are added to 802.16.3 systems, the protocols MUSTaccommodate them in an automated fashion.
M32 6.1 This standard SHALL permit two duplex modes of operation: FrequencyDivision Duplex (FDD) and Time Division Duplex (TDD).
M33 6.1 The PHY and MAC protocols MUST provide for duplex (i.e. bi-directional)operation, while preserving the QoS, BER and spectral efficiency requirementsfor data and voice traffic.
M34 6.1 The MAC and PHY protocols MUST provide means to resolve applicablecollocation and interference problems.
M35 6.2 The MAC and PHY protocols MUST permit the operation with channelspacing of 1.75, 3.5 and 7MHz when using ETSI masks and 1.5 to 25MHzwhen using other masks.
M36 7 Table 1 provides a summary of the QoS requirements that the PHY and MACSHALL provide.
M37 7 802.16.3 protocols MUST support classes of service (CoS) with variousquality of service (QoS) guarantees to support the services that an 802.16.3system MUST transport.
M38 7 Thus, 802.16.3 protocol standards MUST define interfaces and procedures thataccommodate the needs of the services with respect to allocation andprioritization of resources.
M39 7 802.16.3 protocols MUST provide the means to enforce QoS contracts andService Level Agreements.
M40 7 For QoS-based, connectionless services, the 802.16.3 protocols MUST supportresource negotiation “on-demand”.
M41 7 If 802.16.3 is to be a “link” in the IP network, an IWF MUST interface with802.16.3 to negotiate resource allocation.
M42 7.2 802.16.3 protocols SHALL define a set of parameters that preserve the intentof QoS parameters for IP-based services.
M43 7.3 The classes of service and QoS parameters of services SHALL be translatedinto a common set of parameters defined by 802.16.3.
M44 8.1 The 802.16.3 protocols MUST permit operators to enforce service levelagreements (SLAs) with subscribers by restricting access to the air link,discarding data, dynamically controlling bandwidth available to a user or other
2000-09-26 IEEE 802.16.3-00/02r4
19
appropriate means.
M45 8.1 The 802.16.3 protocols MUST also permit subscribers to monitor performanceservice levels of the 802.16.3 services being provided at the delivery point.
M46 8.2 When such capabilities are available, the 802.16.3 protocols SHALL support asecure function.
M47 8.2 The operator MUST have means to shut down and reactivate a subscriberstation if necessary, remote from the subscriber station, in the face of amalfunction.8.2
M48 8.3 The 802.16.3 system management framework, architecture, protocols andmanaged objects MUST allow for operators to effectively administeraccounting and auditing.
M49 8.3 An operator MUST be able to account for resource utilization and variousservice features for each subscriber service separately.
M50 9 The 802.16.3 system SHALL enforce security procedures described in thissection.
M51 9 The security system chosen by 802.16.3 SHALL be added to the protocol stackand reference points to include security protocols, and “database” servers forauthentication, authorization, key management, service suspend/resume,relocation, anti-cloning, etc.
M52 9.1 There are two types of authentication for an 802.16.3 system. In the first type,a subscriber station MUST authenticate itself with the network every time itregisters with the network. This authentication MUST prevent unauthorizedsubscriber station from entering the network or an unauthorized base stationfrom emulating an authorized base station. This type of authentication MUSTbe supported by the 802.16.3 MAC layer.
M53 9.1 The authentication mechanisms MUST be secure so that an “enemy”subscriber station is not able to gain access to an 802.16.3 system, or to thecore network beyond.
M54 9.1 Passwords and secrets MUST NOT be passed “in the clear” through the airinterface.
M55 9.2 The 802.16.3 standard SHALL identify a standard set of credentials and allowfor vendors to extend the defined credentials with non-standard credentials.
M56 9.2 For each service offered, the 802.16.3 protocols MUST be capable of securelysupporting authorization requests and responses.
A.2 Recommended (R)It is recommended that the 802.16.3 standard support or specify the items in Table 3“Recommended” means that there may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances to ignorean item, but the full implications should be understood and the case carefully weighed beforechoosing a different course.
2000-09-26 IEEE 802.16.3-00/02r4
20
Table 3: Recommended Requirements
# Section Requirement
R1 1.1 Other goals of this document are to formulate reference models andterminology for both network topology and protocol stacks that help the802.16 working group to discuss and develop the MAC and PHY protocols.As far as possible, these SHOULD be common across 802.16 systems.
R2 2.2 The repeater function SHOULD NOT affect the end-to-end operation of802.16.3 protocols between BS and SS.
R3 3.2 For efficient transport of IPv6, TCP/IP header compression over the airinterface SHOULD be supported.
R4 3.2 It SHOULD be possible to support the emerging IP Quality of Service (QoS)efforts: Differentiated Services and Integrated Services.
R5 3.3 The 802.16.3 protocols SHOULD support bridged LAN service capabilities,whether directly or indirectly, including always on, ad hoc and on-demandcommunication in either or both directions.
R6 4 Note that the function of the MAC protocols SHOULD include errorcorrection by retransmission, or Automatic Repeat Request (ARQ), whereas,in the 802 model, those functions if necessary, are provided by the LLC layer.
R7 5.1 The 802.16.3 protocols SHOULD allow for different “scales” of capacity andperformance for 802.16.3 system instances.
R8 5.2 The 802.16.3 MAC protocol SHOULD allow the peak data rate to scalebeyond 10 Mbps.
R9 5.3 The PHY and MAC protocol SHOULD provide for far CPEs’ propagationdelay compensation.
R10 5.5 802.16.3 protocols SHOULD allow for flexibility between delivered upstreamand downstream capacity and CoS/QoS.
R11 5.6 An 802.16.3 system SHOULD be available to transport all services at betterthan their required maximum error rates (see section 5.7) from about 99.9 to99.99% of the time, assuming that the system and radios receive adequatemains power 100% of the time and not counting equipment availability.
R12 5.6 802.16.3 MAC and PHY protocols SHOULD specify functions and proceduresto adjust transmitter power, modulation, or other parameters to accommodaterapid changes in channel characteristics.
R13 5.9 Given the propagation characteristics in a given frequency band andgeographic area, and the development of a link budget, the followingparameters of an 802.16.3 system SHOULD be addressed by the MAC andPHY protocols:
� Radio range (up to 50 Km)� Upstream/downstream channels’ data rates� Allocation of prospective subscriber data rate to channels. Note: the MAC
and PHY standards MAY allow subscribers to hop between channels� Types of modulation
2000-09-26 IEEE 802.16.3-00/02r4
21
R14 6.2 The typical value [channel spacing] for performance analysis SHOULD be3.5MHz for the ETSI mask and 3MHz for the MDS mask.
R15 7.3 802.16.3 protocols SHOULD include a mechanism that can supportdynamically-variable-bandwidth channels and paths (such as those defined forIP environments).
R16 8 The 802 standards define a framework for LAN/MAN management inISO/IEC 15802-2: 1995(E). The framework contains guidelines for managedobjects, management protocol, and the relationship to ITU managementprotocols. 802.16.3 protocols SHOULD comply with the above-mentionedstandards and guidelines.
R17 8.2 The operator also SHOULD have the means to securely shut down andreactivate a base station remotely.
R18 8.2 The 802.16.3 protocols SHOULD support functions that automatically shutsdown transmission from a subscriber station or base station in case ofmalfunction (e.g., power limits exceeded).
R19 9.3 802.16.3 standards SHOULD allow a suitable cryptographic algorithm to beemployed that is internationally applicable.
R20 9.3 Facilities SHOULD also be defined in the protocol for the use of alternatecryptographic algorithms that can be used in certain localities and that canreplace algorithms as they are obsoleted or “legalized” for international use.
R21 10 802.16.3 SHOULD strive to fit into the 802 system model.
A.3 Optional (O)It is optional that the 802.16.3 standard support or specify the items in Table 4.
2000-09-26 IEEE 802.16.3-00/02r4
22
Table 4: Optional Requirements
# Section Requirement
O1 2.1 The model [Figure 2-2: Wireless Access Reference Model] depicts the relevantpoints between subscriber networks and “core” networks (the networks thatMAY be accessed via 802.16.3 air interface).
O2 2.1 A single SS MAY support multiple customer premises networks that transportdata, voice and video through one or more UNIs.
O3 2.1 Base stations MAY support multiple core networks through one or more CNIs.
O4 5.9 The MAC and PHY standards MAY allow subscribers to hop betweenchannels.
O5 5.9 Flexible modulation types, power level adjustment, and bandwidth reservationschemes MAY be employed [which affect how the MAC and PHY protocolsmeet contracted service levels with customers].
O6 7 [To support on-demand resource allocation,] The MAC protocol MAY allocatebursts of PDUs to services that require changes in resource allocation.
O7 7 The 802.16.3 MAC layer interface MAY provide a connection-less serviceinterface that requires a higher-layer “adaptation” to maintain the “state” of aconnection and periodically allocate resources.
O8 9.1 The second type of authentication is between the subscriber and the BWAsystem. This may or may not be the responsibility of the 802.16.3 protocols.It MAY be handled by higher layer protocols.
2000-09-26 IEEE 802.16.3-00/02r4
23
B Vocabulary of Terms (Normative)Editor’s Note: Some definitions below are as yet undefined. And a few other are as yetincomplete or in-progress. The 802.16.3 task group should provide updates for these definitionsand release a new version of this document. The in-progress definitions are in italics.
Term Definition Reference
Access End-user connection(s) to core networks
NOTE 1 - Core networks include, for example,PSTN, ISDN, PLMN, PSDN, Internet, WAN/LAN,CATV, etc.
NOTE 2 - The end-user may be a single user or auser accessing the services on behalf of multipleusers.
Based on Rec. ITU-RF.1399
Accounting A function which apportions the revenue obtainedby the service providers to network operators inline with commercial arrangements.
Rec. ITU-R M.1224
Ad hoccommunication
Use of the wireless access system withoutreservation or QoS guarantees at sporadic times, byactivating the link when needed.
Air interface The common boundary between the subscriberstation and the radio equipment in the network,defined by functional characteristics, commonradio (physical) interconnection characteristics, andother characteristics, as appropriate.
NOTE 1 – An interface standard specifies the bi-directional interconnection between both sides ofthe interface at once. The specification includesthe type, quantity and function of theinterconnecting means and the type, form andsequencing order of the signals to be interchangedby those means.
Based on Rec. ITU-RM.1224
Always oncommunication
Use of the wireless access system at any time byhaving the link continuously available.
Authentication The process of verifying the identity of a user,terminal, or service provider.
Rec. ITU-R M.1224
Authorization A property by which the rights to resources areestablished and enforced.
Rec. ITU-R M.1224
Backhaul service Transport of aggregate communication signalsfrom base stations to the core network.
IEEE 802.16
Bandwidth;communicationchannel bandwidth
The information payload capacity of acommunication channel available to a user forservices (expressed in bit/s or multiples thereof).
2000-09-26 IEEE 802.16.3-00/02r4
24
Bandwidth; RFchannel bandwidth
The frequency extent of a specified portion of theRF spectrum capable of carrying information overthe radio interface (expressed in Hz or multiplesthereof).
Bandwidth;transmissionchannel bandwidth
The frequency extent required for the transmissionof a specified signal (expressed in Hz or multiplesthereof).
Base station The common name for all the radio equipmentlocated at one and the same place used for servingone or several cells. (See also “station”).
ITU-R Rec. M.1224
Bearer service A type of telecommunication service that providesthe capability for the transmission of signalsbetween user-network interfaces.
ITU-T Rec. I.112
Broadband wirelessaccess
wireless access in which the connection(s)capabilities are higher than the primary rate.
Rec. ITU-R F.1399
Cell The radio coverage area of a base station, or of asubsystem (e.g. sector antenna) of that base stationcorresponding to a specific logical identification onthe radio path, whichever is smaller.
Based on Rec. ITU-RM.1224
Cell A block of fixed length which is identified by alabel at the asynchronous transfer mode layer ofthe B-ISDN protocol reference model.
ITU-T Rec. I.113
A component of cell transfer delay, induced bybuffering and cell scheduling.
ATM ForumCell delay variation
The proportion of lost cells over the total numberof transmitted cells for a connection.
ATM Forum
Channel;communicationchannel
A specific portion of the information payloadcapacity, available to the user for services.
ITU-T Rec. I.113
Channel; radio-frequency (RF)channel
A specified portion of the RF spectrum with adefined bandwidth and a carrier frequency and iscapable of carrying information over the radiointerface.
Rec. ITU-R M.1224
Channel;transmissionchannel
A means of unidirectional transmission of signalsbetween two points.
ITU-T Rec. I.112
Class of Service This is either a Customer Class of Service, a TrunkClass of Service, or a Private-Facility Class ofService. It may refer to either originating orterminating accesses.
ITU-T Rec. Q.1290(95), 2
Core network Core networks include, for example, PSTN, ISDN,PLMN, PSDN, Internet, WAN/LAN, CATV, etc.
Based on Rec. ITU-RF.1399
Customer premises The equipment/network administered by the user. Based on ITU-T Rec.
2000-09-26 IEEE 802.16.3-00/02r4
25
equipment/network H.310
Downstream The direction from base station to subscriberstation(s).
IEEE 802.16
Dynamicallyvariable bandwidth
A capability of a system to be able to change thebandwidth of the information payload capacity of acommunication channel available to a user forservices according to negotiated user requirements.
External Network Any network that is physically located past thebase station or the subscriber station.
Fixed wirelessaccess
Wireless access application in which the basestation and the subscriber station are fixed.
Based on Rec. ITU-RF.1399
Frequency DivisionDuplex
Separation of upstream and downstreamtransmission in the frequency domain at the sametime.
IEEE 802.16
Internet protocol Networking protocol defined by IETF standards. IETF
Interoperability The ability of multiple entities in differentnetworks or systems to operate together without theneed for additional conversion or mapping of statesand protocols.
Rec. ITU-R M.1124
Inter-working The means of supporting communicationsinteractions between entities in different networksor systems.
Rec. ITU-R M.1124
Inter-workingfunction
Mechanism which masks the differences inphysical, link, and network technologies byconverting or mapping states and protocols intoconsistent network and user services.
Rec. ITU-R M.1124
Link Budget The allocation of power within a link. Link budgetconsists of the difference between Tx power andreceiver sensitivity.
Line-of-sight (LOS) A radio communication link for which 60% orgreater of the first Fresnel zone is unobstructed.
(i.e., the geographical region where the rules offree space propagation applies).
Two points for which the signal suffers temporalfading of less than 10 dB 99% of the time.
Note: This definition does not imply that a directoptical line of sight exists.
Modulation Factor The sector’s aggregate payload bit rate divided bythe bandwidth.
Multi-tenant A primarily non-commercial building designed to
2000-09-26 IEEE 802.16.3-00/02r4
26
dwelling contain more than two residential units.
Near LOS A radio communication link for which 40% orgreater of the first Fresnel zone is obstructed.
Two points for which the signal suffers temporalfading greater than or equal to 10 dB exceeding1% of the time and an average delay spread of lessthan 10 microseconds.
Non LOS A radio communication link that is obstructed.
Two points for which the signal suffers an averagedelay spread of greater than or equal to 10microseconds.
Network A set of nodes and links that provides connectionsbetween two or more defined points to facilitatetelecommunication between them.
Rec. ITU-R M.1224
Nomadic wirelessaccess
Wireless access application in which the subscriberstation may be in different places but must bestationary while in use.
Based on ITU-R Rec.F.1399
On demandcommunication
Use of the wireless access system for servicesbased on negotiated QoS.
Peak Data Rate The maximum bit rate available to a user forcommunications.
plesiochronousmode
A mode where the essential characteristic of timescales or signals such that their correspondingsignificant instants occur at nominally the samerate, any variation in rate being constrained withinspecified limits.
ITU-T Rec. G.810(96), 4.3.5
Point-to-multipointsystem
a system that establishes connections between asingle specified point and more than one otherspecified points.
ITU-R Rec. F.1399
Privacy The provision of capabilities to prevent access ofinformation by unauthorized parties.
ANSI T1.702-1995
Quality of service The collective effect of service performance whichdetermine the degree of satisfaction of a user of theservice.
NOTE 1 - The quality of service is characterizedby the combined aspects of service supportperformance, service operability performance,serviceability performance, service securityperformance and other factors specific to eachservice.
NOTE 2 - The term "quality of service" is not usedto express a degree of excellence in a comparativesense nor is it used in a quantitative sense for
ITU-T Rec. E.800(94), 2101
2000-09-26 IEEE 802.16.3-00/02r4
27
technical evaluations. In these cases a qualifyingadjective (modifier) should be used.
Radio interface See air interface Rec. ITU-R M.1224
Real-Time(adjective)
Pertaining to the processing or transmission of dataaccording to defined time requirements .
Based on ITU-T Rec.Q.9 (88), 6103
Re-use Factor;Frequency re-usefactor
As yet undefined
Sector As yet undefined
Sector BandwidthFactor
As yet undefined
Security The protection of information availability, integrityand confidentiality, as well as authentication andauthorization.
Based on Rec. ITU-RM.1224
Semi-stateless As yet undefined Sect 7
Service A set of functions offered to a user by anorganization.
Recs. ITU-R M.1224,M.1308
Service Capability Defines possible service arrangements with respectto the number and type of channels that can besupported by the equipment. In this way asubscriber station access capability is the set ofpossible channel configurations supported by theequipment. Similarly, the base station accesscapability may be considered to be a super-set withrespect to the subscriber station.
Based on ITU-T Rec.Q.1063 (88), 2.4
Single Residential A non-commercial building intended to beinhabited by an individual.
Small Business As yet undefined
Small Office/HomeOffice
As yet undefined
Spectrum (Spectral)Efficiency
Measures of the accuracy and completeness ofsystem tasks relative to the spectral resources usedto achieve the specific system tasks
Based on ITU-T Rec.F.901 (93), 2
Standard A document established by consensus andapproved by a recognized body, that provides, forcommon and repeated use, rules, guideline orcharacteristics for activities or their results, aimedat the achievement of the optimum degree of orderin a given context.
ISO/IEC Guide 2,1996
Station the common name for all the radio equipment atone and the same place.
NOTE - The term "station" may refer to any end-
Rec. ITU-R M.1224
2000-09-26 IEEE 802.16.3-00/02r4
28
user radio equipment (“subscriber station”) ornetwork radio equipment (“base station”).
Subscriber A person or other entity that has a contractualrelationship with a service provider on behalf ofone or more users. (A subscriber is responsible forthe payment of charges due to that serviceprovider.)
Rec. ITU-R M.1224
Subscriber station the common name for all the radio equipment atone and the same place serving one or more users.(See also “station”).
Based on Rec. ITU-RM.1224
Supplementaryservice
A service which modifies or supplements a basictelecommunication service. Consequently, it cannot be offered to a customer as a standaloneservice, rather, it must be offered together with orin association with a basic telecommunicationservice. The same supplementary service may becommon to a number of telecommunicationservices.
Rec. ITU-R M.1224
Synchronoustransfer mode
A transfer mode which offers periodically to eachconnection a fixed-length block.
Based on ITU-T Rec.I.113
System A regularly interacting or interdependent group ofitems forming a unified whole technology.
Recs. ITU-R M.1224,M.1308
Telecommuter As yet undefined
Time DivisionDuplex
Separation of upstream and downstreamtransmission in the time domain using the samefrequency.
IEEE 802.16
Upstream The direction from subscriber station(s) to basestation.
IEEE 802.16
User Any entity external to the network which utilizesconnections through the network forcommunication.
ITU-T Rec. E.600
Virtual point-to-point connections
Providing a point-to-point connection to asubscriber using a point to multipoint system.
IEEE 802.16
Wireless access end-user radio connection(s) to core networks.
NOTE 1 - Core networks include, for example,PSTN, ISDN, PLMN, PSDN, Internet, WAN/LAN,CATV, etc.
NOTE 2 - The end-user may be a single user or auser accessing the services on behalf of multipleusers.
Rec. ITU-R F.1399
2000-09-26 IEEE 802.16.3-00/02r4
29
B.1 Acronyms and AbbreviationsAcronym/Abbreviation DefinitionAF Assured ForwardingANSI American National Standards InstituteARQ Automatic repeat RequestBER Bit Error RatioBES Best Effort ServiceBS Base StationBWA Broadband Wireless AccessCNI Core Network InterfaceCoS Class of ServiceCSMA/CD Carrier Sense multiple Access with Collision DetectionDFM Dispersive Fade MarginDSL Digital Subscriber LineEF Expedited ForwardingER Errored BlockETSI European Telecommunications Standard InstituteFCAPS Fault, Configuration, Accounting, Performance, Security ManagementFDD Frequency Division DuplexFEC Forward Error CorrectionFWA Fixed Wireless AccessHFC Hybrid fiber coaxHTTP Hypertext Transfer ProtocolIEC International Electrotechnical CommissionIETF Internet Engineering Task ForceIP Internet protocolISDN Integrated Services Digital NetworkISO International Organization for StandardizationITU-R International Telecommunications Union- Radiocommunications SectorIWF Inter-working functionJRG Joint Rapporteur groupLAN Local area networkLLC Logical link controlLOS Line of SightMAC Medium Access ControlMAN Metropolitan area networkMGMT ManagementOSI Open Systems InterconnectionPDU Protocol Data UnitPHY Physical layerPMD Physical Medium DependentP-MP Point-to-multipointPSTN Public Switched Telephone NetworkQoS Quality of serviceRF Repeater FunctionSDE Secure Data ExchangeSEC SecuritySES Severely Errored SecondSLA Service Level AgreementSME Small and Medium EnterprisesSNMP Simple Network Management ProtocolSOHO Small Office/Home OfficeSS Subscriber StationTC Transmission convergenceTCP/IP Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol
2000-09-26 IEEE 802.16.3-00/02r4
30
TDD Time Division DuplexUNI User Network interfaceVoIP Voice over IPWEP Wire-Equivalent Privacy
2000-09-26 IEEE 802.16.3-00/02r4
31
C References
[1] IEEE Standards Association. Project Authorization Request. Telecommunications and Information ExchangeBetween Systems - LAN/MAN Specific Requirements - Air Interface for Fixed Broadband Wireless Access Systemsin Licensed Bands from 2 to 11 GHz. March 30, 2000. http://ieee802.org/16/sub11/par/index.html.
[2] IEEE LAN/MAN Standards Committee (IEEE 802 LMSC) Sponsor Executive Committee. 802.16.3(Broadband Wireless Access Air Interface Standard In Licensed Bands from 2 to 11 GHz): Meting the FiveCriteria. March 9, 2000. http://ieee802.org/16/sub11/par/fivec.html.
[3] Recommendation ITU-R F.1399. Vocabulary of terms for wireless access.
[4] Doug Gray, 802.16cc-99/04 WW Spectrum Allocations for BWA.
[5] Marianna Goldhammer, 802.16sc-99/16 MAC Services.
[6] S. Blake et al, "An Architecture for Differentiated Services", RFC 2475, December, 1998.
[7] S. Blake et al, "A Framework for Differentiated Services", Internet Draft, October, 1998.
[8] R. Braden et al., "Integrated Services in the Internet Architecture: An Overview", RFC 1633, June 1994.
[9] George Fishel, 802.16sc-99/22 Interface to MAC and LLC Protocols.
[10] ISO/IEC 8802-2:1998. Information technology -- Telecommunications and information exchange betweensystems -- Local and metropolitan area networks -- Common specifications -- Part 2: Logical Link Control.
[11] IEEE Std 802-1990 "IEEE Standards for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks: Overview and Architecture.IEEE 1990.
[12] ISO/IEC 10039: 1991. Information technology -- Open Systems Interconnection -- Local area networks --MAC service definition.
[13] ISO 7498-1:1984. Information technology -- Open Systems Interconnection -- Basic Reference Model.
[14] James Mollenauer, 802.16sc-99/5 Functional Requirements for Broadband Wireless Access Networks.
[15] Imed Frigui, 802.16sc-99/23 Services and Performance requirements for Broadband Fixed Wireless Access.
[16] Robert Duhamel, 802.16sc-99/17 LMDS Cell Sizing and Availability.
[17] Recommendation ITU-T G.826: Error performance parameters and objectives for international, constant bitrate digital paths at or above the primary rate (2/99).
[18] Recommendation ITU-R F.1491. Error performance objectives for real digital radio links used in the nationalportion of a 27 500 km hypothetical reference path at or above the primary rate.
[19] C.W. Lundgren and W.D. Rummler, "Digital radio outage due to selective fading observation vs. predictionfrom laboratory simulation," Bell System Technical Journal, pp.1073-1100, May-June 1979.
[20] M. Emshwiller, "Characterization on the performance of PSK digital radio transmission in the presence ofmultipath fading," ICC'78 Conference Record, Toronto, Ontario, CANADA, Paper 47.3.
[21] Microwave digital radio systems criteria, Bellcore Technical Reference TR-TSY-000752, October 1989.
2000-09-26 IEEE 802.16.3-00/02r4
32
[22] W.D. Rummler, R.P. Coutts, and M. Linger, "Multipath fading channel models for microwave digital radio,"IEEE Communications Magazine, November 1986, pp.30-42.
[23] R. K. Crane, "Prediction of Attenuation by Rain" IEEE, 1980.
[24] Recommendation ITU-R F.1189-1. Error performance objectives for constant bit rate digital paths at or abovethe primary rate carried by digital radio-relay systems which may form part or all of the national portion of a 27500km hypothetical reference path. (1995-1997).
[25] CCIR Recommendation 749, Radio-Frequency channels arrangements for radio-relay systems operating in the36.0 to 40.5 GHz band. (1992).
[26] John Liebetreu, 802.16sc-99/13 Dispersive Fade Margin: A Physical Layer Performance Metric.
[27] RFC-2205 Resource ReSerVation Protocol (RSVP) -- Version 1 Functional Specification. R. Braden, Ed., L.Zhang, S. Berson, S. Herzog, S. Jamin. September 1997. Status: PROPOSED STANDARD.
[28] ISO/IEC 15802-2:1995. Information technology -- Telecommunications and information exchange betweensystems -- Local and metropolitan area networks -- Common specifications -- Part 2: LAN/MAN management.
[29] Jim Mollenauer, 802.16sc-99/7 Functional Requirements for the 802.16 Standard.
[30] IEEE 802.10-1998. IEEE Standards for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks: Standard for InteroperableLAN/MAN Security (SILS).
[31] IEEE 802.10c-1998. IEEE Standards for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks: Supplement to Standard forInteroperable LAN/MAN Security (SILS) -- Key Management (Clause 3).
[32] ISO 15802-3:1998. Information technology -- Telecommunications and information exchange betweensystems -- Local and metropolitan area networks -- Common specifications -- Part 3: Media Access Control (MAC)bridging.
[33] ISO/IEC 15802-5:1998. Information technology -- Telecommunications and information exchange betweensystems -- Local and metropolitan area networks -- Common specifications -- Part 5: Remote Media AccessControl (MAC) bridging.
[34] IEEE 802.1Q-1998. IEEE Standards for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks: Virtual Bridged Local AreaNetworks.
[35] IEEE 802.1F-1993. IEEE Standards for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks: Common Definitions andProcedures for IEEE 802 Management Information.