2003-12-02 environmental information systems for monitoring, assessment, and decision-making
TRANSCRIPT
Environmental Information Systems for Monitoring, Assessment, and Decision-
making
Stefan FalkeAAAS Science and Technology Policy Fellow
U.S. EPA - Office of Environmental Information
Environmental Information Systems
Monitoring
Analysis & Assessment
Decision-making
Delivery/Presentation Storage/Description
Spatial Analysis
Environmental Information Systems
Monitoring
Analysis & Assessment
Decision-making
Delivery/Presentation Storage/Description
Environmental Information Systems
Monitoring
Analysis & Assessment
Decision-making
Delivery/Presentation Storage/Description
Web-based Information Systems
Environmental Information Systems
Monitoring
Analysis & Assessment
Decision-making
Delivery/Presentation Storage/Description
SensorWebs
Mapping Air Quality
point monitoring data
spatial interpolation
ci is the estimated concentration at location i
n is the number of monitoring sitescj is the concentration at monitoring site j
wij is the weight assigned to monitoring site j
Goal: Reduce the uncertainty in mapping air quality data from point measurements. Use a data-centric spatial interpolation that is based on physical principles.
estimated continuous surface
Spatial Interpolation with Monitor Clusters
Declustered weighting shows the proper allocation of the 1/3 weight to the cluster of sites.
There is a cluster of four sites. When applying standard distance weighted interpolation, the cluster will account for 2/3 of estimated value at i while the two single sites each only account for 1/6 of the total weight.
Standard interpolation applies equal weight; each site has 1/3 of the weight on the estimate at i.
Declustered Interpolation
ijijij CWDw
i
pij
pij
ijR
RD
Inverse distance weight
ij
jkijk R
r
nCW
1Cluster weight
X j
Rij
i
X1
X3
X2
r j3
r j2r j1 X j
Rij
i
X1
X3
2
r j3
r j2
r j1
X
CW~ 0.25 CW~ 1.00
Variance Aided Mapping
11
n
xxV
n
ii
j
1 jijijij VCWDw
Temporal variance is indicative of local source influenced monitoring sites.
The higher a site’s variance, the lower its interpolation weight and the more restricted its radius of influence during interpolation.
Variance Weighting Example
In central Ohio, most monitoring sites experience similar temporal variance in O3 and weights assigned to the sites are simply R-2. In estimating O3 near St. Louis, high variance sites (St. Louis urban sites) are used along with low variance sites (rural sites) and their respective weights are altered from R-2.
Interpolation weights using distance and temporal variance of daily maximum ozone concentrations, 1991-1995
Estimated Ozone Concentrations, 1991-1995
Estimation Error
Mean estimation error at least clustered locations with DIVID is about 10% lower than kriging and 30% lower than inverse distance.
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
6.5
7
0.150.30.450.60.750.9
Clusterness
Me
an
Ab
solu
te E
rro
r (p
pb
)
Kriging
DIVID
ID
most clustered least clustered
Barrier Aided Estimation
• Vertical Flow Barriers (Scale Height)
• Horizontal Flow Barriers (Mountains)
Pollutants are “trapped” in valleys while mountain tops have low pollutant concentrations
PM10 in California
Without Barriers With Barriers
AIRS PM10 data (1994-1996)
Sierra Nevada Mountains are clearly visible with barrier aided estimation
Surrogate Aided Interpolation
Fine Mass Concentrations1/r2 Interpolation
Extinction Coefficient1/r2 Interpolation
Fine Mass Bext1/r2 Interpolation
Bext Aided FM = Fine Mass Bext
x Bext
1991-1995Summer
1991-1995Summer
1991-1995Summer
1991-1995Summer
Satellite Imagery for PM Assessment
Spaceborne sensors allow near continuous aerosol monitoring throughout the world. When fused with surface data they provide information on the spatial, temporal, and chemical characteristics of aerosols than cannot be determined from any single image or surface observation.
Goal: Fuse SeaWiFS and TOMS satellite data with surface observations and topographic data to describe extreme aerosol events.
1998 Asian Dust Storm
The underlying color image is the surface reflectance derived from SeaWiFS.
The TOMS absorbing aerosol index (level 2.0) is superimposed as green contours.
The red contours represent the surface wind speed from the NRL surface observation data base.
The blue circles are also from the NRL database and indicate locations where dust was observed.
The high wind speeds generated the large dust front seen in the SeaWiFS, TOMS, and surface observation data.
2000 Saharan Dust
A massive dust storm transports dust off the west coast of Africa into the Atlantic Ocean and across the Canary
Islands.
Fuerteventura and Lanzarote Islands are fully blanketed by the murky yellow colored dust plume. Gran Canaria and Tenerife are partly covered by the dust layer but their higher elevations appear to protrude above the dust layer at about 1200m.
Future Research Interests
•Spatial and temporal interpolation
•Uncertainty / Estimation Error Maps
•Integration of surface and satellite data
•Development of web-based spatio-temporal tools
AAAS Fellowship Program
http://fellowships.aaas.org
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) fellowship program to bring science and engineering PhDs to D.C. and the policy process
Fellows are placed in federal agencies (EPA, State Dept., NSF, NIH, USAID…) and in Congress
Goal is to provide scientific expertise to offices and to gain first hand experience in the policy process
Interoperable Environmental Information Systems
Advances in monitoring and information technology have resulted in the collection and archival of large quantities of environmental data.
However, stove-piped systems, independently developed applications, and multiple data formats have prevented these data and the systems that serve them from being shared.
Interoperable environmental information systems offer the potential for attaining systems of shared information and applications within a distributed environment.
Environmental Monitoring for Public Access and Community Tracking (EMPACT)
Data Analysis & Visualization Data Analysis & Visualization
Information Dissemination Technology Information Dissemination Technology (Internet, Kiosks, Newspaper, TV, etc.)(Internet, Kiosks, Newspaper, TV, etc.)
Real Time Environmental MonitoringReal Time Environmental Monitoring
Assists communities in providing sustainable public access to Assists communities in providing sustainable public access to environmental monitoring data and information that are environmental monitoring data and information that are clearly-communicated, available in near real-time, useful, and clearly-communicated, available in near real-time, useful, and accurateaccurate
A funded EMPACT project had three required components:
EMPACT Project Locations
Distributed Environmental Information Network
Data Users
Publish – Make data and tools available to the Web
Find – Enable the discovery of data and tools through Web-based search engines
Bind - Connect data and tools to user applications for value added processing
MinimizeBurden
Maximize Transparency
Data Sources
States
Others
EPACDX Portal
GEIAWeb Portal
EuropeEI
CECEI
Network
Data and Tool Description
DataData
Description(Metadata)
Tools
Tool Description
XML
WebServices
Wrappers
Internet
Data Vendor City Agency State Agency Fed. AgencyClearinghouse
Whoville Cedar Lake
Whoville Cedar Lake
ParcelsRoadsImagesBoundaries ...
Integrated View
CatalogView
DataMetadata
DataMetadata
DataMetadata
DataMetadata
Catalog thatindexes data,
similar to WWW’s html search engines
Common interfaces enable interoperability
Queries extractdata from diversesources
Distributed Environmental Information Systems
XML
Data Wrapping
Web Services
Chesapeake Bay GIS Project
AIRNOWOracle Database
Internet/Intranet
ArcIMS ServerArcIMS ServerWMS Connector
WMS Applet
Participants:- National Aquarium - Towson University - Maryland DNR - Chesapeake Bay Program
Web-based Visibility Information System
Project with EPA/OEI/EMPACT, Washington University/CAPITA, and Sonoma Technology, Inc
Objective: To develop a web-based, near real time visibility and PM2.5 mapping system
Phase 1: Map visibility every 6 hours using Naval Research Lab’s Surface Observation Data
Phase 2: Incorporate ASOS Data into mapping system
Phase 3: Use visibility as a surrogate for mapping PM2.5
Quebec Fires, July 6, 2002
SeaWiFS, METAR and TOMS Index superimposed
SeaWiFS satellite and
METAR surface haze shown in the Voyager distributed data
browser
Satellite data are fetched from NASA GSFC; surface data
from NWS/CAPITA servers
States/Tribes
Interoperable
EPAGeo
Services
Geo-processing
5-year EPA Geospatial Architecture Vision
Users
• • •
Servers
Data Sources
Feds
Others
EnterprisePortal
CDX Portal
System of Access
NSDI Node
Geospatial One-Stop
Feds
Industry
States
CivilianLocals
Mapping
Geo-Metadata
Geo Data &Tools Indexes
Geo-reporting
EPA
EPAGeo
ServicesCatalog
EPA
EPA
Web
Tools
Red arrows and dotted lines indicate information flow based on standards, such as XML
Geography Network
The Open GIS Consortium (OGC)
• The Open GIS Consortium (OGC) is a not-for-profit, international consortium whose 250+ industry, government, and university members work to make geographic information an integral part of information systems of all kinds.
• Operates a Specification Development Program that is similar to other Industry consortia (W3C, ISO, etc.).
• Also operates an Interoperability Program (IP), a global, innovative, partnership-driven, hands-on engineering and testing program designed to deliver proven specifications into the Specification Development Program.
OGC VisionOGC Vision
A world in which A world in which everyone benefits everyone benefits
fromfromgeographic geographic
information and information and services made services made
available available across any network, across any network,
application, or application, or platform.platform.
OGC MissionOGC Mission
To deliverTo deliverspatial interface spatial interface
specificationsspecificationsthat are openly that are openly
available for global available for global use.use.
Open GIS Web Services (OWS) Vision
• Creates evolutionary, standards-based framework to enable seamless integration of online geoprocessing and location services.
• Future applications assembled from multiple, network-enabled, self-describing geoprocessing and location services.
• Break down barriers between real world, information about real world, and users.
Open GIS Web Services Sponsors, Participants, and Coordinating Organizations
Demo Integration
OGC IP TeamOGC IP Team
OGCOGCManagement TeamManagement Team
OGCOGCArchitecture TeamArchitecture Team
Common ArchitectureWorking Group
Web MappingWorking Group
Sensor WebWorking Group
ParticipantsCompusultCubeWerx
Dawn Corp.DLRESRI
Galdos SystemsGMU
IntergraphIonic Software
Laser-ScanPCI Geomatics
PolexisSAIC
Social Change Online
SynclineYSI
University of Alabama
HuntsvilleVision for NY
SponsorsSponsors
FGDCFGDCGeoConnections CanadaGeoConnections CanadaLockheed MartinLockheed MartinNASANASANIMANIMAUSGSUSGSUS EPAUS EPAUSACE ERDCUSACE ERDCCANRICANRI
BAE, LMCO, NASA, TASC, GST, Image Matters, OGC Staff BAE, LMCO, NASA, TASC, GST, Image Matters, OGC Staff
Coordinating OrganizationsCoordinating OrganizationsUrban Logic, CIESIN, NYC DOITT, NYC DEP,Urban Logic, CIESIN, NYC DOITT, NYC DEP,
FEMA,FEMA, EPA Region 2EPA Region 2
Sensor Webs
Sensor Webs are web-enabled sensors that can seamlessly exchange data with other web-based applications and can communicate with one another – leading to “dynamic networks”
Advances in micro-electronics, nanotechnology, and wireless communication have provided the potential for the development of environmental sensors that will provide major leaps in the available coverage, timeliness, and resolution of monitoring information.
Will enable spatially and temporally dense environmental monitoring
Sensor Webs will reveal previously unobservable phenomena since they can be placed in areas not previously suitable for monitoring
OWS Sensor Collection Service Clients
Distributed Information System Workshops
Distributed Data Dissemination, Access, & Processing (3DAP)
July 2001
- Institutional Interoperability
Web-based Environmental Information Systems for Global Emission Inventories (WEISGEI)
July 2002
- Bring together Information Sciences and Atmospheric Sciences
Future Research Interests
•Council on Environmental Cooperation (CEC) - Integration of Emission Inventories for North America
•Development of a Fire Emissions Inventory
•Web Services (Tools) development
•Implementation of sensor webs for air quality studies
•Policy impacts of real time environmental information
Future Project Interests
•Advanced spatial and temporal interpolation techniques (surrogate data) and corresponding estimation error maps•Web services – going beyond placing maps on the Web interoperability•Smart Sensors and Sensor Webs•Information driven environmental management
Data D
escription
, Form
at and
Interface
Stan
dard
s
Sensors
Brow
sers / Client
Applications
Catalogs &
Query
Tools W
eb-based Services
(Integration
, Aggregation
, Map
pin
g, M
odelin
g)
Databases
Public
Industry
Gov’t
DIVID vs. Kriging
ASOS Visibility Measurements
Prior to 1994, visual range was recorded hourly by human observations
Human observations were replaced with automated light scattering instruments of the Automated Surface Observing System (ASOS)
The ASOS sensor measures the extinction coefficient as one-minute averages and calculates visual range based on a running 10-minute average of the one-minute measurements
Forward scatter ASOS visibility sensor
photocell
detectorprojector
Lens-to-lens3.5 feet
ASOS for Air Quality Studies
•Currently, available only at a quantized resolution of 18 binned ranges with a visual range upper bound of 10 miles, even though the instrument can provide meaningful data up to 20-30 miles.
•In the near future, it is anticipated that ASOS data will be available at their full resolution on the web in “real-time.”
•Even at full resolution, they are of limited use in the western U.S. because visual range there is often in excess of 30 miles.
•The application to “real-time” mapping (hourly or less) needs to be evaluated
Surface Observations Extinction Coefficient
Network Assessment and Network Design
Goal: Develop methods for assessing the performance of air quality monitoring networks using a multi-objective “information value” approach.
•Persons/Station measures the number of people in the ‘sampling zone’ of each station. • Spatial coverage measures the geographic surface each station covers. • Estimation uncertainty measures the ability to estimate the concentration at a station location using data from all other stations. • Pollutant Concentration is a measure of the health risk. • Deviation from NAAQS measures the station’s value for compliance evaluation.
Five measures of network performance considered:
Estimation Error, E• The estimation error is determined by
– selectively removing each site from the database– estimating the concentration at that site by spatial interpolation– setting the error as the difference between the estimated and measured values, E = Est.-Meas.
PM2.5 Error
< -3 μg/m3
-3 - -1 μg/m3
-1 - +1 μg/m3
+1 - +3 μg/m3
> +3 μg/m3
PM2.5 Station Sampling Zones
• Every location on the map is assigned to the closest monitoring station. • At the boundaries the distance to two stations is equal.• Following the above rules, the ‘sampling zone’ surrounding each site is a polygon.• The area (km2) of each polygon is calculated in ArcView.
Census Tract Population
• The population data used for determining a station’s population is from ESRI’s census tract file with estimated 1999 populations.
• The centroid of each census tract is associated with a station area.
• The census tract populations for all centroids that fall within a station’s area are summed.
PM2.5 Network Performance Rankings
Equal weighting of measures
Red=High Ranking Blue=Low Ranking
Bio Sketch
B.A. PhysicsCourses that examined science and
technology in the context of other fields such as law, history, and political science
M.S. Engineering & Policy Courses covered economic, legal,
management, and public policy dimensions of science and technology
Thesis examined information flow in environmental policy making and use of “hypermedia” in the policy making process
1992
1993
1994
Basketball in German Bundesliga
Bio Sketch
D.Sc. Environmental Engineering (1999)
• Mapping Air Quality
• OTAG Data Analysis Workgroup
• PM-Fine Data Analysis Workgroup
• Network Assessment & Design
• Taught Geostatistics and GIS Data Analysis Lab
Research Associate (2000)
• Integration of Satellite Imagery and Surface-based monitoring data
1995-2000
Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend
Analysis
Bio Sketch
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Fellowship (current) –Washington D.C.
• Environmental Monitoring for Public Access and Community Tracking (EMPACT) Program
• Data Integration and web mapping projects including:
Open GIS Consortium Standards
Visibility/PM2.5 Web-mapping
Chesapeake Bay GIS
PM2.5 Estimates using Visibility Surrogate
1998 Central American Fires
SeaWiFS, TOMS, and visibility indicate high aerosol concentrations from Central America transported over the central U.S.
The smoke is transported north into the upper Midwest and to the east. The extinction coefficient is highest further north than the highest TOMS aerosol index.
Smoke plumes over Central America appear over low elevation terrain, while high elevation regions remain mostly smoke free.