2006 general meeting assemblée générale 2006 chicago, illinois

16
2006 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2006 Chicago, Illinois Canadian Institute of Actuaries L’Institut canadien des actuaires

Upload: nerita

Post on 11-Jan-2016

26 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Canadian Institute of Actuaries. L’Institut canadien des actuaires. 2006 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2006 Chicago, Illinois. PD-3 Assumption Setting for Pension Plans What is Reasonable? A Regulator’s Perspective Jean-Claude Primeau - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 2006 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2006 Chicago, Illinois

2006 General Meeting

Assemblée générale 2006

Chicago, Illinois

2006 General Meeting

Assemblée générale 2006

Chicago, Illinois

Canadian Institute

of Actuaries

Canadian Institute

of Actuaries

L’Institut canadien desactuaires

L’Institut canadien desactuaires

Page 2: 2006 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2006 Chicago, Illinois

2006

Gen

eral

Mee

ting

Ass

embl

ée g

énér

ale

2006

2006

Gen

eral

Mee

ting

Ass

embl

ée g

énér

ale

2006

PD-3 Assumption Setting for

Pension Plans

What is Reasonable?

A Regulator’s Perspective

Jean-Claude Primeau

Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions

Page 3: 2006 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2006 Chicago, Illinois

2006

Gen

eral

Mee

ting

Ass

embl

ée g

énér

ale

2006

2006

Gen

eral

Mee

ting

Ass

embl

ée g

énér

ale

2006OSFI’s MandateOSFI’s Mandate

• Protect interests of pension plan members and beneficiaries

• How does the selection of actuarial assumptions fit into OSFI’s mandate?- adequate funding is a key aspect in the protection of

members’ interests- actuarial reports must comply with CIA Standards of

Practice- OSFI expects selection of assumptions to be reasonably

prudent, including adequate margins- Pension plans are voluntary arrangements and the regulators

recognize the delicate balance that exists between theinterests of plan members and employers

Page 4: 2006 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2006 Chicago, Illinois

2006

Gen

eral

Mee

ting

Ass

embl

ée g

énér

ale

2006

2006

Gen

eral

Mee

ting

Ass

embl

ée g

énér

ale

2006

Going Concern AssumptionsGoing Concern Assumptions

Discount rates

Discount rate selection should reflect the following factors:

- reasonable expectations of future investment

returns

- investment policy

- current asset mix

- margins for adverse deviations

- risk factors

Page 5: 2006 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2006 Chicago, Illinois

2006

Gen

eral

Mee

ting

Ass

embl

ée g

énér

ale

2006

2006

Gen

eral

Mee

ting

Ass

embl

ée g

énér

ale

2006

Going Concern AssumptionsGoing Concern Assumptions

Discount rates- OSFI has been encouraging actuaries to moderate

future return expectations- OSFI’s current view is that a discount rate before

expenses greater than 6.5% for plans invested in balanced portfolios does not contain adequate margins

- Many actuaries have reduced their discount rate assumptions in the last two years

- We have compiled statistics of rates used in reports filed recently

Page 6: 2006 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2006 Chicago, Illinois

2006

Gen

eral

Mee

ting

Ass

embl

ée g

énér

ale

2006

2006

Gen

eral

Mee

ting

Ass

embl

ée g

énér

ale

2006

Assumed Going-Concern Discount Rates

Assumed Going-Concern Discount Rates

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

% of Plans

Less than6.00%

6.00% -6.24%

6.25% -6.49%

6.50% -6.74%

6.75% -6.99%

Greaterthan 7.00%

Range

Page 7: 2006 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2006 Chicago, Illinois

2006

Gen

eral

Mee

ting

Ass

embl

ée g

énér

ale

2006

2006

Gen

eral

Mee

ting

Ass

embl

ée g

énér

ale

2006

Going Concern AssumptionsGoing Concern Assumptions

Expenses- Many actuaries state discount rate assumptions net of

all expenses- Our assessment of the discount rate assumption looks

at the gross rate before expenses- It may be reasonable to express the investment

expense assumption implicitly and reduce the discount rate appropriately

- OSFI encourages setting explicit expense assumptions, especially for non-investment expenses, taking into account historical experience and expected future levels

Page 8: 2006 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2006 Chicago, Illinois

2006

Gen

eral

Mee

ting

Ass

embl

ée g

énér

ale

2006

2006

Gen

eral

Mee

ting

Ass

embl

ée g

énér

ale

2006

Going Concern AssumptionsGoing Concern Assumptions

Salary Escalation- It is useful to describe the components of the

salary escalation assumption, i.e. base increases and merit and promotional scales

- OSFI has raised objections with assumptions that include negative merit or promotional scales

Page 9: 2006 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2006 Chicago, Illinois

2006

Gen

eral

Mee

ting

Ass

embl

ée g

énér

ale

2006

2006

Gen

eral

Mee

ting

Ass

embl

ée g

énér

ale

2006

Going Concern AssumptionsGoing Concern Assumptions

Mortality- OSFI expects the use of one of the 1994 mortality

tables unless justification is provided for using a less conservative table

- Close to 90% of plans have been using a 1994 table in recent reports filed with OSFI

Page 10: 2006 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2006 Chicago, Illinois

2006

Gen

eral

Mee

ting

Ass

embl

ée g

énér

ale

2006

2006

Gen

eral

Mee

ting

Ass

embl

ée g

énér

ale

2006

Going Concern AssumptionsGoing Concern Assumptions

Retirement Age- The retirement age assumption should be consistent

with the plan provisions and reasonable behavioral expectations

- Where a plan contains early retirement benefits subject to consent, the actuary should assume that consent is granted or make a reasonable assumption about the probability of consent being granted

Page 11: 2006 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2006 Chicago, Illinois

2006

Gen

eral

Mee

ting

Ass

embl

ée g

énér

ale

2006

2006

Gen

eral

Mee

ting

Ass

embl

ée g

énér

ale

2006

Solvency AssumptionsSolvency Assumptions

Discount Rate Assumptions- Active members who meet eligibility conditions for

immediate retirement may have an option between an immediate pension or the commuted value if the plan terminates

- In that situation, OSFI requires the actuary to assume that at least 50% of members will choose the most expensive option

Page 12: 2006 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2006 Chicago, Illinois

2006

Gen

eral

Mee

ting

Ass

embl

ée g

énér

ale

2006

2006

Gen

eral

Mee

ting

Ass

embl

ée g

énér

ale

2006

Solvency AssumptionsSolvency Assumptions

Discount Rate Assumptions- The CIA does not issue annuity proxy

recommendations for indexed annuities due to the lack of actual experience

- Actuaries of indexed plans must make reasonable assumptions for the price of indexed annuities

- OSFI does not have a set formula or approach for indexed annuities but the selected basis should not normally produce liabilities lower than the commuted value basis

Page 13: 2006 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2006 Chicago, Illinois

2006

Gen

eral

Mee

ting

Ass

embl

ée g

énér

ale

2006

2006

Gen

eral

Mee

ting

Ass

embl

ée g

énér

ale

2006

Solvency AssumptionsSolvency Assumptions

Wind-up Expenses- There is little available data on actual wind-up

expenses- OSFI would encourage industry studies on this

subject to provide assistance to actuaries in making reasonable assumptions

Page 14: 2006 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2006 Chicago, Illinois

2006

Gen

eral

Mee

ting

Ass

embl

ée g

énér

ale

2006

2006

Gen

eral

Mee

ting

Ass

embl

ée g

énér

ale

2006

Solvency AssumptionsSolvency Assumptions

Wind-up Expenses- OSFI’s analysis looks at the wind-up expenses

expressed as a dollar amount per member- Many actuaries make wind-up expenses assumptions

that appear very low- OSFI often raises this issue with plan actuaries- We have compiled statistics on assumptions used in

recent reports

Page 15: 2006 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2006 Chicago, Illinois

2006

Gen

eral

Mee

ting

Ass

embl

ée g

énér

ale

2006

2006

Gen

eral

Mee

ting

Ass

embl

ée g

énér

ale

2006

0

5

10

15

20

25

% of Plans

Lessthan$100

$100 -$149

$150 -$199

$200 -$249

$250 -$299

$300 -$399

$400 -$499

$500 -$999

Greaterthan

$1,000

Range

Average Solvency Expense Assumption (per member basis)

Average Solvency Expense Assumption (per member basis)

Page 16: 2006 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2006 Chicago, Illinois

2006

Gen

eral

Mee

ting

Ass

embl

ée g

énér

ale

2006

2006

Gen

eral

Mee

ting

Ass

embl

ée g

énér

ale

2006

Solvency AssumptionsSolvency Assumptions

Retirement Age- The actuary should assume retirement ages where the

commuted value is maximized, based on CIA Standards of Practice

- When a plan offers early retirement benefits subject to consent, the description of the assumptions should be clear on the assumption made with respect to consent being granted