2008 solar annual review meeting - national … solar annual review meeting session: csp advanced...

30
2008 Solar Annual Review Meeting Session: CSP Advanced Systems: Optical Materials Organization: National Renewable Energy Laboratory Cheryl Kennedy NREL 303-384-6272 [email protected] NREL/PR-550-43334 Presented at the Solar Energy Technologies Program (SETP) Annual Program Review Meeting held April 22-24, 2008 in Austin, Texas

Upload: nguyentram

Post on 10-Jul-2019

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

2008 Solar Annual Review Meeting

Session: CSP Advanced Systems: Optical MaterialsOrganization: National Renewable Energy Laboratory

Cheryl [email protected]

NREL/PR-550-43334Presented at the Solar Energy Technologies Program (SETP) Annual Program Review Meeting held

April 22-24, 2008 in Austin, Texas

“…to make CSP cost competitive in the intermediate power markets by 2015 (~7¢/kWh with 6 hours of storage) and in baseload power markets (~5¢/kWh with 16 hours of storage) by 2020.”

1. Optical Materials project overview a) Project description: Characterize advanced reflectors, perform accelerated

and outdoor testing of commercial and experimental reflector materials, and provide industry support.

b) Major FY08 Activities:

• Mirror Characterization and Testing

• CSP Advanced Concepts FOA Support– 3M – Hardcoats for Polymeric Mirrors – Abengoa – Advanced Front Surface Polymeric Reflector – Alcoa – Aluminum reflector– PPG – High Value Mirrors

Relationship to Solar Program Goals

“…to make CSP cost competitive in the intermediate power markets by 2015 (~7¢/kWh with 6 hours of storage) and in baseload power markets (~5¢/kWh with 16 hours of storage) by 2020.”

1. Project overview (continued)Project description:c) Planned Milestones

• Level 5:– Complete installation of new accelerated exposure chambers

(3/08)– Determine new optical performance, lifetimes, and cost goals with

input from technical community (3/08)– Report summarizing durability silvered thin-glass copper-free &

lead-free mirrors after accelerated and outdoor exposure (6/08)

• Level 4:– Report summarizing durability of candidate solar mirror samples

(9/08) – Report summarizing FOA support activities (9/08)

Relationship to Solar Program Goals

1. Project overview (continued)Project descriptiond) Budget Table (FTEs, $FTE, Subcontract Info)

Relationship to Solar Program Goals

Agreement FTEs $(K) Subcontract $(K)

Mirror Characterization & Testing

0.93 310

FOA Support 0.93 250

FOA: 1900

3M – Hardcoats for Polymeric Mirrors

350

Abengoa – Advanced Front Surface Polymeric Reflector

448

Alcoa – Aluminum reflector 399PPG – High Value Mirrors 323

1. Project overview (continued)Project description:

e) Personnel contributing to the project:

NREL: Total <1 FTECheryl Kennedy, Kent Terwilliger

Student interns: Marc Oddo, Andrea Warrick

2. Relevance to Program Plans & GoalsSolar Program Multi-Year Technical Plan targets cost reductions of up to 50% to the solar concentrator and recommends one of the ways the goals could be achieved is through technology advances that include lightweight front-surface reflectors that contain anti-soiling coatings.

Relationship to Solar Program Goals

FY08 Progress Report1. What has been accomplished thus far?

a) Technical highlights:– Continued durability testing of solar mirrors by accelerated and

outdoor exposure in Colorado, Florida, and Arizona– Responding to numerous (daily) industry requests for technical

assistance & data– Restoring capabilities

hiring staff purchasing new accelerated weathering equipment purchasing new optical measurement equipment

– Helped DOE organize “Specialty Glass Needs of the U.S. Solar Industry” workshop

– Organized 2 CSP Applications & Desalination sessions at SolarPACES

– Presented 2 invited papers at industry meetings

FY08 Progress Report1. What has been accomplished thus far?

b) Issues that have come up; solutions proposed:

• Insufficient resources to meet urgent requests for technical information & data from established and emergent CSP (& CPV) industries; plus increased testing & evaluation for FOA awardees & industry. – Hiring replacement staff – Purchasing replacement equipment – Will not have sufficient resources to meet all requests

• Reduced number of outdoor test facilities– Discussing possible loan agreement w/ Excel (Pueblo, CO)

& PPG (Pittsburg, PA)

• Working with industry to develop new goals & standards – Industry acceptance after Solar Glass Workshop– US/International: Glass, Silvering, Coating, Utilities,

Developers

FY08 Progress Report1. What has been accomplished thus far?

c) Costing (current level; projected end-year balance)

FY06 Budget FY07 Budget FY08 Budget

Advanced Concepts

$130k $135K $310k

Advanced Concepts FOA Support

$0k $0k $250k

Capital Equipment

$0k $113k $283k

Broad Industry Collaboration:Glass Mirror

• Thick (>3-mm) Glass– Flabeg– NSG Pilkington – Cristaleria Espanola S.A

(i.e., Saint-Gobain)– Saint-Gobain – PPG (CSP FOA)– RioSolar – CSR (formerly Pilkington

Australia → Veridian → CSR)– Arch– Cardinal– Guardian

• Thin (~1-mm) Glass– AGC Belgium

(i.e., Asahi Glass Company formerly Glaverbel)

– AGC Thailand– AGC Indonesia– Naugatuck Glass Company

• Mirror Coating– Valspar– Spraylat

Reflective Layer (wet-silver)

Low-iron Glass (1-mm to 4-mm thick)

2nd coat Paint Layer (10% Pb →1% Pb)(lead-free <0.15% Pb or < 5 ppm Pb)

1st coat Paint Layer (20% Pb →2.5% Pb)(lead-free <0.15% or <5 ppm BP)

Architecture of Glass Mirror

Back Layer (Cu)(Cu-less)

Adhesive (PS, spray)

Substrate (SS, Al)

UV / Moisture / Adhesive Barrier Layer

Original High-Pb Flabeg is durable

85

90

95

100

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Total UV Dose (100 x MJ/m2)

% H

emis

pher

ical

Ref

lect

ance

APS FLA NRELCi65

Equivalent NREL Exposure Time (years)

3 6 12 15 180 24219

10 20 40 50 600 807030

Low-Pb Flabeg Mirror may be less durable than high-Pb

80

85

90

95

100

0.0 3.3 6.7 10.0 13.3 16.7 20.0

Total UV Dose (100 x MJ/m2)

% H

emis

pher

ical

Ref

lect

ance

High Pb - Ci65Low Pb - Ci65High Pb - NRELLow Pb - NREL

Equivalent NREL Exposure Time (years)

1 2 4 5 60 3

3.3 6.7 13.3 16.7 20.00.0 10.0

Alternate Thick Glass Mirror

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

0.0 3.3 6.7 10.0 13.3 16.7 20.0 23.3 26.6 30.0 33.3 36.6 40.0 43.3 46.6 50.0 53.3

Total UV Dose (100 x MJ/m2)

% H

emis

pher

ical

Ref

lect

ance

Ci65 - PilkingtonCi65 - Spanish

Equivalent NREL Exposure Time (years)1 2 3 4 50 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 1610

3.3 6.7 10.0 13.3 16.70.0 20.0 23.6 26.6 30.0 36.6 40.0 43.3 46.6 50.0 53.333.3

Industry Collaboration:Aluminized Mirror

• Alanod• Alcoa (CSP FOA)• Alcan• Aluminum Coil Anodizing (ACA)

Protective Overcoat

Oxide-Enhancing Layer

Aluminum Reflective LayerPolished Aluminum SubstrateArchitecture of aluminized mirrors

Loss of Specularity of Alanod Aluminized Reflector w/ Fluropolymer Overcoat

Alanod 4270/kk0

20

40

60

80

100

0.0 3.3 6.7 10.0 13.3 16.7 20.0 23.3 26.6

Total UV Dose (100 x MJ/m2)

7-m

radi

an S

pecu

lar R

efle

ctan

ce a

t 660

nm

APSFLANRELCi65

Equivalent NREL Exposure Time (years)

1 2 3 4 50 6 7 8

Alanod Aluminized Reflectorwith Nanocomposite oxide layer

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 333 666 999

Exposure Time (Years)

% S

pecu

lar R

efle

ctan

ce

0.0 3.33 6.66 9.99

0 1 2 3

Total UV Dose (100 x MJ/m2)

SWV

25-mrad

7-mrad

Arizona♦ Colorado▲ Florida× New Mexico• Ci65

Reflective Layer (100 nm Ag)

PMMA superstrate

Pressure Sensitive Adhesive (PSA)

Substrate

Development of Improved 3M Polymer Mirror- based on prior NREL collaborations

• Antisoiling/hardcoat (FOA)

• Adhesion promoting layer

• Possibly provide laminated to substrate and heat treated

• Built on:– Joint NREL/3M subcontract– NREL patent– 2 NREL DDRDs

Reflective Layer (100 nm Ag)

PMMA superstrate

Pressure Sensitive Adhesive (PSA)

Substrate

Anti-soiling Layer

Adhesion Promoting Layer (1-10 nm)

Development of Improved 3M Polymer Mirror- based on prior NREL collaborations

Metal Back Layer (30 -50 nm Cu)

• Antisoiling/hardcoat (FOA)

• Adhesion promoting layer

• Possibly provide laminated to substrate and heat treated

• Built on:– Joint NREL/3M subcontract– NREL patent– 2 NREL DDRDs

3M Metallized Polymer Films

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

0.0 3.3 6.7 10.0 13.3 16.7 20.0 23.3 26.7 30.0 33.4 36.7 40.0 43.4

Total UV Dose (100 x MJ/m2)

% H

emis

pher

ical

Ref

lect

ance

SA-85SS-95ECP-300AECP-305ECP-305+

NREL Exposure Time (years)

1 2 3 40 5 7 8 9 106 11 1312

Development of Improved Polymer Mirror - based on prior NREL collaborations

• ReflecTech CRADA– Hardcoats

• Built on:– Joint NREL/ReflecTech patent– NREL/ReflecTech subcontract

ReflecTech

UV-Screening Superstrate

Base Reflector

Bonding Layer

Flexible Polymer Substrate

ReflecTech Prototypes

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

0 3.3 6.6 9.9 13.2 16.5 19.8 23.1 26.4

Total UV Dose (100 x MJ/m2)

% H

emis

pher

ical

Ref

lect

ance

UV-Screen/SS95-NRELReflecTech A-NRELReflecTech B-NRELUV-Screen/SS95-WOMReflecTech A-WOMReflecTech B-WOM

Equivalent NREL Exposure Time (years)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Reflective Layer (100 nm Ag)

Top Protective Layer (1-4µm Al2O3)

Substrate (PET)

Adhesion Promoting Layer (APL) (1-10 nm)

Front Surface Solar Reflector Architecture• Abengoa Solar (CSP FOA)

– commercialize NREL / SAIC IBAD Al2O3 ASRM subcontract

Reflective Layer (100 nm Ag)

Top Protective Layer (1-4µm Al2O3)

Substrate (PET) (Chrome Plated Steel,Leveled Stainless Steel, or Aluminum)

Anti-soiling Layer (100 nm TiO2)

Adhesion Promoting Layer (APL) (1-10 nm)

Front Surface Solar Reflector Architecture

Metal Back Layer (30 nm Cu —optional)

• Abengoa Solar (CSP FOA) – commercialize NREL / SAIC IBAD Al2O3 ASRM subcontract

Reflective Layer (100 nm Ag)

Top Protective Layer (1-4µm Al2O3)

Substrate (PET) (Chrome Plated Steel,Leveled Stainless Steel, or Aluminum)

Anti-soiling Layer (100 nm TiO2)

Adhesion Promoting Layer (APL) (1-10 nm)

Front Surface Solar Reflector Architecture

Metal Back Layer (30 nm Cu —optional)IBAD Al2O3

• Abengoa Solar (CSP FOA) – commercialize NREL / SAIC IBAD Al2O3 ASRM subcontract

Outdoor exposure at NREL of Roll-Coated IBAD Al2O3 Samples

80

85

90

95

100

0.0 3.3 6.7 10.0 13.3 16.7 20.0

Total UV Dose (100 x MJ/m2)

% H

emis

pher

ical

Ref

lect

ance

Web - 20 nm/s

Batch - 1 nm/s

NREL Exposure Time (years)

3.3 6.7 10.0 13.30.0 16.7 20.0

1 2 3 40 5 6

FY08 Progress Report

2. What will be accomplished in the 3rd and 4th Quarters? Status of milestones:

a) Level 5:• Complete installation of new accelerated exposure chambers

• Determine new optical performance, lifetime, and cost goals with industry

• Report summarizing durability silvered thin-glass copper-free & lead-free mirrors after accelerated & outdoor exposure testing

b) Level 4:• Report summarizing durability of candidate solar mirror samples

• Report summarizing FOA support activities

Future Activities1. FY09 Planned Activities

a) Follow-on efforts:– Continue current R&D activities– Continue to support of CSP FOA awards & industry – Additional support of Phase II FOA awards– Upgrade database to web accessible

b) New directions:– Determine acceleration factor for damp-heat– Reproduce service lifetime prediction (SLP) methodology

for new 3M ECP-305+– Develop standards and qualification tests with industry for

solar mirrors – Determine soiling rates for different materials at sites

Future Activities

1. FY09 Planned Activitiesc) Budget Table - assuming level budget

d) Projected Milestones– Report on solar mirrors and FOA projects– Upgrade database to web accessible– Report on soiling rates– Durability of solar mirror review article

FTEs $FTE Purchase SubcontractAdvanced Concepts

0.83 $248K $100k $60k

Advanced Concepts FOA Support

0.63 $188K $100k $1900k

Capital Equipment

$290k

Future Activities

2. FY10 (FY09?) and Beyond Ideasa) Future Projects:

– Continue to test advanced solar mirrors – Continue to provide FOA & industry support– Expand service lifetime prediction (SLP) methodology to other

FOA (PPG, Alcoa, Abengoa) materials– Correlate barrier properties (water & oxygen) with durability for

advanced front surface reflectors– Develop advanced front surface reflector concepts – Develop advanced antisoiling coatings & cleaning techniques – Develop CSP/CPV reflector standards

Future Activities2. FY10 and Beyond Ideas

b) Outside the Box Ideas:– Overloaded with current task plans and urgent industry request

and to need bring new staff up to speed before can brainstorm “Outside the Box” ideas

c) Your vision of the solar future:– Deployment of parabolic troughs, dishes, and heliostats that

use 30 to 50 M m2 of highly specular, durable, low-cost, light-weight, advanced solar reflectors with coatings that prevent soiling thus reducing O&M and water usage