20080125 friday food
DESCRIPTION
Quantitative analysis of ultrasound imagesof the preterm brain Ewout Vansteenkiste - IBBT-Medisip-UGentTRANSCRIPT
19/03/2007Quantitative analysis of ultrasound images of the preterm brain
Quantitative analysis of ultrasound images of the preterm brain
Ewout VansteenkisteIBBT-Medisip/IPI-UGENTFriday Food 25/01/2008
19/03/2007Quantitative analysis of ultrasound images of the preterm brain
Outline
[Source: William Lawson, A new Orchard and Garden, 1648, Londen]
quantitative image analysis
medicalultrasound
texture-classification
psycho-physics segmentation
registration
speckle-reduction in ultrasound
2D echo/3D MRIregistration
white matterclassification
white mattersegmentation
ventriclesegmentation
segmentationcarotid
1/24
19/03/2007Quantitative analysis of ultrasound images of the preterm brain
Quantitative image analysis
tumor = “white dot” in the imagesize = “small”, “average”
Qualitative analysis : in words
2.25 cm²
Both experts measure the tumorUsing the same segmentation
algorithm
Quantitative analysis: through measuring
2/24
19/03/2007Quantitative analysis of ultrasound images of the preterm brain
Medical ultrasound
3/24
0
50
100
150
200
250
SPECKLE
probe
electric current
Piëzo-electric cristal pulsing
Tissue structures/transitionsskin
19/03/2007Quantitative analysis of ultrasound images of the preterm brain
White matter damage = Periventricular Leukomalacia (PVL)
grey matter: what we think with
white matter: highways of the brain
ventricles: cavities regulating brain fluid
- Preterm infants born between week 26 and 32
- Very low birth weight (<1500g)
- Lack of oxygen = increased chance on brain damage
mild
severe
4/24
19/03/2007Quantitative analysis of ultrasound images of the preterm brain
White matter damage diagnosis
- critical condition preterms: incubated/ventilated- acquiring high-quality scans (MRI) is not trivial in first days of life (starts only at day 3)- fontanelle open = early echo is possible - early detection is important
pros: - non-invasive/safe - portable
- real-time imaging- relatively cheap
contras: - poor image quality- diagnosis = subjective
“flaring”
normal severe mild
5/24
flaring
19/03/2007Quantitative analysis of ultrasound images of the preterm brain
Problem = subjectivity
- Flaring (areas) difficult to describe - Not easy to delineate objectively- Qualitative diagnosis insufficient
- Quantitative objective results? 1) flaring? 2) how widely spread?
6/24
19/03/2007Quantitative analysis of ultrasound images of the preterm brain
Tissue texture classification (1)
- Texture: no unique definition. Description: regular, irregular, stochastic pattern present in most natural scenes:
- Texture parameters: mathematical measures expressing texture characteristics
- Scale determines texture:
7/24
- Important for ultrasound: tissue structure is manifested as speckle texture
19/03/2007Quantitative analysis of ultrasound images of the preterm brain
Example texture parameters: co-occurrence matriceswood cloth
Contrast = 100Entropy = 0.78
Contrast = 60Entropy = 0.34
pathological benign
Contrast = 70Entropy = 0.44
Contrast = 130Entropy = 0.64
255
0 255
0
2D co-occurrence matrix
8/24
19/03/2007Quantitative analysis of ultrasound images of the preterm brain
Tissue texture classification (2)
length
w
idth
length
w
idth
length
wid
th
??
9/24
19/03/2007Quantitative analysis of ultrasound images of the preterm brain
patholigical non-pathological
140 patients
Tissue texture classification (3)
Machine-settings:
-Gain-Power -Time Gain Compensation
Compensation algorithm
Quantitative analysis = precision 92.5%
= sensitivity 88%
Texture parameters:- Skewness- Contrast- Angular second moment- X-gradient- Y-gradient
Bayes classifier
KNN classifier
classifier combination
- pathological- non-pathological
Normalization
LDAclassifier
Qualitative analysis = precision 75%
= sensitivity 70%
10/24
19/03/2007Quantitative analysis of ultrasound images of the preterm brain
Outline
[Source: William Lawson, A new Orchard and Garden, 1648, Londen]
Quantitative image analysis
medicalultrasound
Texture classification
white matterclassification
11/24
19/03/2007Quantitative analysis of ultrasound images of the preterm brain
Flare segmentation and area estimation
Validation?
Initial texture- Basd segmen-Tation map
-Morfological closing-Gradient-Opening byReconstruction
expert existingnew
Expert delineation: subjective?2D US 3D MRIregistrati
on
12/24
sensitivity 98%
19/03/2007Quantitative analysis of ultrasound images of the preterm brain
Multimodal image registration
- idea = “1 + 1 adds up to more than two”- registering = aligning images so that relevant structures overlap- multimodal = images of different image modalities, CT, MRI, echo- fusion = the result after registration
Magnetic Resonance Scanner + 3D high-quality imaging- limited scan time resulting in low axial-resolution
+ 2D high-resolution- low image quality
13/24
19/03/2007Quantitative analysis of ultrasound images of the preterm brain
Multimodal 2D ultrasound to 3D MRI registration
initialization
Mutuel InformationMetric
Regular StepGradientDescent
Rigid Transformation
Trilinear Interpolation
result
14/24
19/03/2007Quantitative analysis of ultrasound images of the preterm brain
Validation registration = “CAVE” + segmentation
Registration algorithm
flaring segmentation MRI-flaring expert
15/24
19/03/2007Quantitative analysis of ultrasound images of the preterm brain
Segmentation extended: ventricles + carotid
enlarged ventriclesindicative for PVL
3D reconstruction
2D seg- mentation
Bifurcation of the carotid: atherosclerosis
3D reconstruction
[Source = Glor, 2004]
2D seg- mentation
16/24
19/03/2007Quantitative analysis of ultrasound images of the preterm brain
Outline
[Source: William Lawson, A new Orchard and Garden, 1648, Londen]
quantitative image analysis
medicalultrasound
Texture-classification
segmentation
registration
2D echo/3D MRIregistration
white matterclassificaton
white mattersegmentation
ventriclesegmentation
segmentationcarothid
17/24
19/03/2007Quantitative analysis of ultrasound images of the preterm brain
Psychovisual experiments
STIMULISUBJECTS
dummy? physicians?
Experts?
METHODOLOGY
18/24
19/03/2007Quantitative analysis of ultrasound images of the preterm brain
Image degradations
- Increasing amount of artefact removing algorithms:
- Problem: how to assess the quality of degraded/filtered images
19/24
blur noise artefacts
19/03/2007Quantitative analysis of ultrasound images of the preterm brain
Test room implementation examples (1)
© Cedric Marchessoux - BARCO
20/24
19/03/2007Quantitative analysis of ultrasound images of the preterm brain
Set-up experiment: filtering of ultrasound images
- Can we facilitate a qualitative diagnosis by speckle suppression?
- GenLik-methode developed at our department adapted to ultrasound images
- Improved technique applied successfully on quantitative registration and segmentation tasks
[bron: Pizurica, 2002]
original filtered
21/24
19/03/2007Quantitative analysis of ultrasound images of the preterm brain
methodology + results
- Different scenes (stimuli) were selected containing diverse image structures and 4 levels of filtering:
- Given the difficulty to differentiate noise from relevant information, following question was posed to the experts involved in the experiment :
- Which image do you prefer in terms of diagnostic image quality (discrete scale -3 to 3)
22/24
Les
suite
d fo
r di
agn
osis
degree of filtering 0 1 2 3 4
speckle reductionrejected !
19/03/2007Quantitative analysis of ultrasound images of the preterm brain
Conclusion
-Classification algorithm for white matterdamage
-Segmentation algorithm to estimate flaring area (in practice since 2005)
-Registration algorithm to align 2D ultrasound images and 3D MRI data
-Ventricle segmentation-Segmentation algorithm carotid
-Psycho-visual experiment on speckle suppression
23/24
Improved, early quantitativedetection of PVLsensitivity: 70% 98%+ultrasound moresensitive than MRI
19/03/2007Quantitative analysis of ultrasound images of the preterm brain
and remember…
The more questions you now ask, the less time we have to eat…
24/24