2010 statistical abstract working - tennessee · this section also implements and monitors...

FY 2010

Statistical Abstract

Prepared: October 2010

By:

Tennessee Department of Correction Planning and Research Division

The Tennessee Department of Correction Fiscal Year 2009 – 2010 Statistical Abstract

Coordinated and Published by

Planning and Research Division

Dr. Mary Karpos, Director Michael Gasiecki, Statistical Analyst Supervisor Tanya Washington, Budget Analyst Coordinator

Tim Oliver, Administrative Services Assistant

To request a copy of this report, or other research information, contact us at

Telephone: 615-741-1000 ext. 8153 Email: [email protected]

Visit the TDOC website: www.tn.gov/correction

Pursuant to the State of Tennessee’s policy on nondiscrimination, the Department of Correction does not discriminate on the basis of race, gender, religion, color, national or ethnic origin, age, disability, or military service in its policies, or in the admission of or access to, or treatment or employment in, its programs, services, or activities. Equal Employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action inquiries or complaints should be directed to the Department of Correction, EEO/AA Coordinator, Human Resources Office, 3rd Floor Rachel Jackson Building, 320 Sixth Avenue North, Nashville, TN 37243-0465, Telephone 615-741-1000 ext. 8026 or TDD (for persons with hearing impairments), 615-532-4423. ADA inquiries or complaints should be directed to the Department of Correction, Human Resources Office, 3rd Floor Rachel Jackson Building, 320 Sixth Avenue North, Nashville, TN 37243-0465, Telephone 615-741-1000 ext. 8026 or TDD (for persons with hearing impairments), 615-532-4423.

TABLE OF CONTENTSBUDGET & STAFFING 7Personnel by Race and Sex 9Personnel by Class 9Correctional Officer Series Vacancy Rates 10Correctional Officer Series 11Authorized Full Time Equivalents (FTE'S) 11Facility Staffing vs. Inmate Average Daily Population 12Salary Comparisons 13Correctional Officer Turnover Rate 14Budget Recommendations by Function of Government 15POPULATION, CAPACITY & TRENDS 17State Incarceration Rates 19Institutional Capacity & Population Distribution 20Total Felon Population (Historical and Projected) 21Unmet Bed Demand by Sex 21Total Felon Population 22Year-End Inmate Population Trends 22Fiscal Year-End Incarcerated Felon Population 23Felony Inmate Population by Age 24Felony Inmate Population by Sex and Race 25Felony Inmate Population by Sex, Race, and Location 25Local Jail Census 26Average Sentence Length by Primary Offense (Stock Population Detail) 27Average Sentence Length by Primary Offense (Admissions) 28Average Time Served by Primary Offense (Releases by Location) 29Average Time Served by Primary Offense (Releases by Type) 30Yearly Admissions and Releases 31Felony Admissions by Type 31Felony Releases by Type 31Felony Admissions by Age, Race, and Sex 32Felony Releases by Age, Race, and Sex 32Admissions by Geographical Region 33Admissions by County of Conviction 34Felon Population by County of Conviction 35OFFENDER ACCOUNTABILITY, PROGRAMS & SERVIVCES 37Total Hours and Estimated Value of Community Service Work 39Community Service Hours Worked by Facility 39Inmate Assignments 40Drug Screens - Positive Drug Tests by Percentage 41Educational Enrollment 42Education Test Results 42GED & Vocational Certificates 42Hospital Admissions 43Pharmacy Costs 43Major DSM Groups 44Psychiatry & Psychology Services 44INSTITUTIONS (DEMOGRAPHICS) 45Facilities and Security Designations 47Average Daily Population 48Demographics by Facility 48Facility Populations by Primary Offense 49Incident Summary 50

Budget & Staffing

Budget & Staffing 9

The Central Office Human Resources section provides technical assistance and advice and ensures compliance with Civil Service Rules, EEOC/Affirmative Action, state law, and policies. This section also implements and monitors personnel-related programs such as employee relations, recruitment and retention, training, performance evaluations, employee transactions, and employee benefits, including accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Personnel by Race and Sex June 30, 2010

Male Female Total

White 2,590 1,231 3,821Minority 572 603 1,175

Total 3,162 1,834 4,996

Female Male Minority White0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

TDOC PERSONNEL

Personnel by Class

June 30, 2010

Personnel Type FY09-10 FY08-09 FY07-08 FY06-07 FY05-06 FY04-05 FY03-04 FY02-03 FY01-02

Officials/ Administrators 2.1% 2.1% 2.3% 2.2% 2.0% 2.0% 1.8% 1.8% 1.8%

Security 64.7% 65.3% 64.0% 64.3% 64.4% 64.9% 62.0% 60.1% 62.6%

Maintenance 4.4% 4.4% 4.3% 4.3% 4.4% 4.3% 1.2% 0.6% 1.2%

Professional 16.9% 16.1% 16.5% 16.3% 16.1% 15.8% 14.4% 15.2% 13.9%

Skilled 1.9% 2.0% 2.1% 2.1% 2.1% 2.1% 3.5% 3.5% 3.4%

Clerical 6.5% 6.8% 7.4% 7.4% 7.5% 7.8% 6.1% 6.1% 6.6%

Technical 3.6% 3.4% 3.4% 3.4% 3.5% 3.0% 6.3% 6.7% 7.1%

Para-Professional 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% n/a 0.1% 4.8% 5.9% 5.2%

10 2010 Statistical Abstract

VACANCIES IN UNIFORMED STAFF

Correctional Officer Series Vacancy Rates from 2010

As of: Vacant Positions Total Positions Vacancy Rate

7/1/2010 112 3360 3.3%

7/1/2009 143 3,360 4.3%

7/1/2008 173 3,491 5.0%7/1/2007 94 3,356 2.8%

7/1/2006 73 3,340 2.2%

7/1/2005 55 3,335 1.7%

7/1/2004 56 3,318 1.7%

7/1/2003 57 3,326 1.7%

7/1/2002 85 3,322 2.5%

7/1/2001 144 3,221 4.5%

Vacancy Rate on July 1, 2010

0.00%

1.00%

2.00%

3.00%

4.00%

5.00%

6.00%

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Fiscal Year

Ra

te

Vacancy Rate

Correctional officer vacancy rates declined steadily from a high of 4.5% in fiscal year (FY) 2001 to a low of 1.7% in FY 2003. The rate remained steady throughout FY 2005, peaked at 5.0% in FY 2008, and started a downward turn in FY 2009 through the FY 2010 rate of 3.3%.

Budget & Staffing 11

Correctional Officer Series June 30, 2010

PositionsCorrectional

Officer

Correctional Clerical Officer Corporal Sergeant Lieutenant Captain TOTAL

Total 2,466 132 441 183 77 61 3,360Filled 2,435 123 407 159 69 55 3,248

Facility UniformedNon-

Uniformed Total

Morgan County Correctional Complex 540 170 710

Charles Bass Correctional Complex 298 53 351

DeBerry Special Needs Facility 234 214 448

Mark Luttrell Correctional Complex 127 46 173

Northeast Correctional Complex 388 123 511

Northwest Correctional Complex 474 168 642

Riverbend Maximum Security Institution 263 53 316

Southeastern Tennessee State Regional Facility 224 73 297

Tennessee Correction Academy 30 36 66

Tennessee Prison for Women 181 49 230

Turney Center Industrial Prison & Farm 325 77 402

West Tennessee State Penitentiary 520 151 671

Facility Subtotal 3604 1213 4817

Central Office 4 185 189

Total 3608 1398 5006

AUTHORIZED FULLTIME EQUIVALENTS (FTE'S) in FY 2009 - 2010

96% of the total authorized positions for TDOC are in correctional facilities. 72% of the total system-wide FTE’s are in uniformed security


STAFFING TRENDS

Facility Staffing vs. Inmate Average Daily Population FY 2001 – 2010

0

3,000

6,000

9,000

12,000

15,000

18,000

21,000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Fiscal Year

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

opula

tion

ADP

Facility FTE

Uniformed FTE

Correctional facility staffing trends are presented in the graph above, which include data on total facility staffing (expressed in FTE’s or full time equivalents) and uniformed security staffing levels as compared to the average daily inmate population. Between FY 2001 and FY 2010: Inmate average daily population increased by 15.5% Total facility staffing decreased by 8.7% Total uniformed security staffing decreased by 11.7%


SALARY COMPARISONS The ability to recruit and retain qualified staff continues to be a concern for the Department. Because salary levels are critical in recruitment and retention of staff, the Department closely monitors other correctional and law enforcement agencies to compare its salaries with those

When compared to other neighboring state correctional departments, TDOC ranks 7th in the average starting salary for correctional officers. Source: Southern Legislative Conference, July 2009. TDOC also ranks low when compared to other correctional and law enforcement agencies located near some of our facilities. These are some of the agencies with whom we compete directly in the recruitment and retention of uniformed staff.

State DOC Average Starting Salary

Alabama $28,517

Arkansas $27,492

Virginia $27,485

North Carolina $27,309

Missouri $26,784

Georgia $26,624

Tennessee $24,456

Kentucky Mississippi

$23,346

$22,006

Federal Bureau of Prisons $36,570

Shelby County Sheriff’s Office

$33,124

Hamilton County Sheriff’s Office $32,090

Davidson County Sheriff’s Office Knox County Sheriff’s Office

$30,349 $27,973


CORRECTIONAL OFFICER TURNOVER

TDOC Correctional Officer Turnover Rates: FY 2009 - 2010

Correctional Officer Turnover Rate

Charles Bass Correctional Complex CBCX 38.4%

DeBerry Special Needs Facility DSNF 19.9%

Mark Luttrell Correctional Facility MLCC 30.6%

Morgan County Correctional Complex MCCX 17.6%

Northeast Correctional Complex NECX 9.9%

Northwest Correctional Complex NWCX 13.9%

Riverbend Maximum Security Institution RMSI 35.3%

Southeastern TN State Regional Facility STSRCF 7.2%

Tennessee Prison for Women TPFW 47.2%

Turney Center Industrial Complex TCIX 13.9%

West Tennessee State Penitentiary WTSP 13.7%

System-wide 19.5%

Institution

In fiscal year 2009 - 2010, the correctional officer turnover rate was 19.5% system-wide. This represents a decrease of 8.4 percentage points from the prior fiscal year rate of 27.9%. The turnover rate includes all correctional officers leaving positions, except those occurring when an employee is transferred or promoted within the TDOC system and in the correctional officer series.


TDOC IN THE CONTEXT OF THE STATE BUDGET

General Government, 3.3%

Education, 31.3%

Health & Social Services, 47.6%

Law, Safety, & Correction, 5.1%

Resources & Regulation, 3.3%

Transportation, Business & Economic

Development, 9.4%

The Governor’s Budget included $27.8 billion in recommended funding allocated by “functional area.” Total funding provided to the Department of Correction for FY 2010 was $685,675,100.

Population, Capacity, & Trends

Population, Capacity, & Trends 19

INCARCERATION RATES: TENNESSEE VS. OTHER STATES (Number incarcerated per 100,000)

State Incarceration Rates: June 30, 2009

Rank Rank Rank

1 Louisiana 866 18 California 460 35 Hawaii 323

2 Mississippi 718 19 Indiana 459 36 New Mexico 320

3 Oklahoma 655 20 Delaware 459 37 Kansas 305

4 Texas 649 21 Ohio 449 38 New York 304

5 Alabama 637 22 Tennessee 434 39 New Jersey 297

6 Arizona 579 23 South Dakota 425 40 Iowa 281

7 Florida 558 24 Pennsylvania 400 41 Vermont 274

8 Georgia 533 25 Connecticut 396 42 Washington 269

9 Arkansas 531 26 Maryland 391 43 Nebraska 245

10 South Carolina 526 27 Wyoming 391 44 Utah 232

11 Missouri 516 28 Oregon 375 45 Rhode Island 229

12 Virginia 487 29 Montana 373 46 North Dakota 222

13 Kentucky 484 30 North Carolina 372 47 Massachussetts 215

14 Nevada 478 31 Wisconsin 371 48 New Hampshire 205

15 Michigan 473 32 Illinois 353 49 Minnesota 191

16 Idaho 471 33 Alaska 352 50 Maine 151

17 Colorado 464 34 West Virginia 341 All States 410

Source: Prison Inmates at Midyear 2009, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

Note: The following jurisdictions have integrated prison & jail systems: Delaware, Vermont, Connecticut, Alaska, Hawaii, and Rhode Island.

The mid-year 2009 statistics (released in June 2010), indicate that Tennessee has the 22nd highest incarceration rate in the country. The incarceration rate in Tennessee increased from 430 in June 2007 to 434 in June 2008 and held steady in 2009.


TDOC INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY & POPULATION DISTRIBUTION

GENERAL PURPOSE FACILITIES

Hardeman County Correctional Center (HCCF) 2,016 1,976 1,988 98.6% 100.6%

Mark Luttrell Correctional Center (MLCC) 440 436 424 96.4% 97.2%

Northeast Correctional Complex (NECX) 1,856 1,819 1,805 97.3% 99.2%

Northwest Correctional Complex (NWCX) 2,425 2,377 2,389 98.5% 100.5%

South Central Correctional Facility (SCCF) 1,676 1,642 1,635 97.6% 99.6%

Southeastern TN State Regional Corr. Facility (STSRC) 981 971 932 95.0% 96.0%

Turney Center Industrial Complex (TCIX) 1,572 1,541 1,573 100.1% 102.1%

Whiteville Correctional Facility (WCFA) 1,536 1,505 1,520 99.0% 101.0%SUB-TOTAL 12,502 12,267 12,266 98.1% 100.0%

CLASSIFICATION FACILITIES

Charles Bass Correctional Complex (CBCX) 1,110 1,099 876 78.9% 79.7%Tennessee Prison for Women (TPW) 775 760 762 98.3% 100.3%SUB-TOTAL 1,885 1,859 1,638 86.9% 88.1%

SPECIAL PURPOSE FACILITIES

DeBerry Special Needs Facility (DSNF) 800 736 756 94.5% 102.7%SUB-TOTAL 800 736 756 94.5% 102.7%

HIGH SECURITY FACILITIES

Morgan County Correctional Complex (MCCX)** 2,441 2,417 2,359 96.6% 97.6%

Riverbend Maximum Security Institution (RMSI) 736 714 710 96.5% 99.4%

West Tennessee State Penitentiary (WTSP)** 2,582 2,505 2,484 96.2% 99.2%SUB-TOTAL 5,759 5,636 5,553 96.4% 98.5%TOTALS 20,946 20,498 20,213 96.5% 98.6%

Source: TDOC Population Overview Report.** MCCX now serves as a classification facility to East Tennessee. ** WTSP also serves as a classification facility to West Tennessee.

Population as a Percent of

INSTITUTIONTotal Beds Available

TDOC Operating Capacity

Assigned Count as of 6/30/2010 Available

BedsOperating Capacity

OPERATING CAPACITY VS. INMATE POPULATION PROJECTIONS

Fiscal Year End June 30th

Operating Capacity

Projected Population

Unmet Bed

Demand2010 26,806 26,866 602011 25,301 26,784 1,4832012 25,446 26,898 1,4522013 26,876 27,224 3482014 26,876 27,440 5642015 26,876 27,787 9112016 26,876 28,072 1,1962017 26,876 28,533 1,6572018 26,876 28,846 1,9702019 26,876 29,086 2,2102020 26,876 29,354 2,478


Total Felon Population (Historical and Projected), 1994 - 2020

28,846

27,44026,86626,110

24,235

21,286

16,884

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

1993-94

1994-95

1995-96

1996-97

1997-98

1998-99

1999-00

2000-01

2001-02

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

2012-13

2013-14

2014-15

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

Fiscal Year

Po

pu

lati

on

UNMET BED DEMAND BY SEX

Fiscal Year EndJune 30th Males Females Males Females Male Females

2010 24,873 1,933 24,801 2,065 -72 1322011 23,368 1,933 24,704 2,080 1,336 1472012 23,513 1,933 24,763 2,135 1,250 2022013 24,943 1,933 25,042 2,182 99 2492014 24,943 1,933 25,271 2,169 328 2362015 24,943 1,933 25,559 2,228 616 2952016 24,943 1,933 25,839 2,233 896 3002017 24,943 1,933 26,252 2,281 1,309 3482018 24,943 1,933 26,597 2,249 1,654 3162019 24,943 1,933 26,835 2,251 1,892 3182020 24,943 1,933 27,055 2,299 2,112 366

Operating Capacity Projected Population Unmet Bed Demand


FELON POPULATION TRENDS The felon population data included in this annual report is from the Tennessee Offender Management Information System (TOMIS) unless otherwise stated. Data from other sources may vary from TOMIS due to the time delay in the TOMIS data entry process. In some cases information is not received until several months after sentencing, admissions, release, etc. The data on this page and page 23 are from TDOC monthly population reports.

Total Felon Population: June 30, 2010

County/Local JailsLocally Sentenced 4,378TDOC Backup 2,573

TDOC Prisons 20,213

Community SupervisionParole 12,068Probation 50,953

Community Corrections 7,270

TOTAL 97,455

Fiscal Year-End Inmate Population Trends

Year-End Inmate Population Trends:FY 1994-2010

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

1993

-94

1994

-95

1995

-96

1996

-97

1997

-98

1998

-99

1999

-00

2000

-01

2001

-02

2002

-03

2003

-04

2004

-05

2005

-06

2006

-07

2007

-08

2008

-09

2009

-10

Fiscal Year

Popula

tion

Total Population

Males

Females

Over the past 17 fiscal years (1994 -2010), the incarcerated felon population (including TDOC backup and locally sentenced felons) has increased 60.9% (from 16,884 to 27,164). The male and female felon population increased 54.0% and 219.9% respectively during this same period.


During the past fiscal year, the total incarcerated felon population increased from 27,325 in June 2009 to 27,164 in June 2010, a decrease of 0.6%. The male felon population decreased 1.1% and the female felon population increased 5.4% during FY 2010. Annual Fiscal Year-End Incarcerated Felon Population: FY 1994 - 2010

Fiscal Year-End Incarcerated Felon PopulationFY 1994 - 2010

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Fiscal Year

Po

pu

lati

on

TDOC

Local

Backup

Since 1994, the TDOC in-house population has increased 61.1% (from 12,546 to 20,213). TDOC backup was 106.5% higher in June 2010 than in June 1994 (from 1,246 to 2,573); locally sentenced felons have increased 41.6% during this same period (from 3,092 to 4,378).


FELONY INMATE DEMOGRAPHICS: AGE, SEX, RACE

Felony Inmate Population by Age (System-wide) June 30, 2010

35-3914.1%

25-2918.0%

30-3417.2%

40-4921.9%

18-191.4%

<180.2%

20-2414.4% 50+

12.8%

Felony Inmate Population by Age: June 30, 2010

50+ 2,989 14.9% 292 7.1% 285 8.1% 3,566 12.8%40-49 4,627 23.0% 812 19.7% 627 17.8% 6,066 21.9%35-39 2,935 14.6% 565 13.7% 410 11.7% 3,910 14.1%30-34 3,476 17.3% 770 18.6% 527 15.0% 4,773 17.2%25-29 3,332 16.6% 902 21.8% 755 21.5% 4,989 18.0%20-24 2,490 12.4% 734 17.8% 780 22.2% 4,004 14.4%18-19 228 1.1% 55 1.3% 114 3.2% 397 1.4%<18 29 0.1% 1 0.0% 17 0.5% 47 0.2%Unknown 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 4 0.1% 5 0.0%

TOTAL 20,106 100% 4,132 100% 3,519 100% 27,757 100%

%TDOC

INHOUSE%

TDOC BACKUP

%

Source: Tennessee Offender Management Information System

LOCAL FELON

%SYSTEM-

WIDE


Felony Inmate Population by Sex and Race (System-wide) June 30, 2010

Male91%

Female9%

Other2%

Black47%White

51%

Female Inmate Population by Sex, Race, and Location June 30, 2010

Male

Black 9,032 47.7% 1,150 34.6% 2,173 69.4% 12,355

White 9,399 49.7% 2,105 63.4% 878 28.1% 12,382

Other 491 2.6% 65 2.0% 78 2.5% 634

Total Male 18,922 100.0% 3,320 100.0% 3,129 100.0% 25,371

Female

Black 362 30.6% 114 14.0% 191 49.0% 667

White 805 68.0% 689 84.9% 194 49.7% 1688

Other 17 1.4% 9 1.1% 5 1.3% 31

Total Female 1,184 100.0% 812 100.0% 390 100.0% 2,386

TOTAL 20,106 70.6% 4,132 16.9% 3,519 12.5% 27,757

TDOC % BackupSystem-

Wide

Source: Tennessee Offender Management Information System

% Local %


Lo

cal J

ail C

ensu

s: F

Y 2

009

- 20

10

JUL

Y

AU

G

SE

PT

O

CT

NO

VD

EC

JAN

FE

B

MA

R

AP

RM

AY

JUN

E

To

tal J

ail P

opu

lati

on

27,1

69

27,2

18

26,9

93

26,7

0325

,795

24,0

7324

,717

24,9

71

25,3

74

25,8

2825

,927

26,1

15

TD

OC

Bac

kup

2,

426

2,35

9 2,

233

2,12

42,

229

2,03

62,

064

2,11

1 2,

156

2,39

12,

675

2,57

3

Lo

cal F

elo

ns

5,43

2 5,

359

5,52

5 5,

270

5,21

75,

011

4,96

64,

921

4,91

2 4,

564

4,47

14,

378

Oth

er C

on

vict

ed F

elo

ns

700

724

701

741

599

564

596

740

612

823

833

885

Co

nvi

cted

Mis

dem

ean

ants

5,

741

5,11

5 5,

339

5,49

94,

981

4,53

05,

023

4,96

0 5,

156

5,52

05,

103

5,21

0

Oth

ers

1017

10

03

948

913

942

909

892

891

939

9

52

921

1107

Pre

-tri

al D

etai

nees

Fel

on

y 8,

272

8,53

8 8,

506

8,43

48,

280

7,90

68,

054

8,01

5 8,

284

8,29

78,

325

8,62

1

Mis

dem

eana

nt

3,58

1 4,

120

3,74

1 3,

722

3,54

73,

117

3,12

23,

333

3,31

5 3,

281

3,59

93,

341

Per

cen

tage

of

Jail

Po

pu

lati

on

JU

LY

A

UG

S

EP

T

OC

TN

OV

DE

CJA

NF

EB

M

AR

A

PR

MA

YJU

NE

TD

OC

Bac

kup

8.

9%

8.7%

8.

3%

8.0%

8.6%

8.5%

8.4%

8.5%

8.

5%

9.3%

10.3

%9.

9%

Lo

cal F

elo

ns

20.0

%

19.7

%

20.5

%

19.7

%20

.2%

20.8

%20

.1%

19.7

%

19.4

%

17.7

%17

.2%

16.8

%

Oth

er C

on

vict

ed F

elo

ns

2.6%

2.

7%

2.6%

2.

8%2.

3%2.

3%2.

4%3.

0%

2.4%

3.

2%3.

2%3.

4%

Co

nvi

cted

Mis

dem

ean

ants

21

.1%

18

.8%

19

.8%

20

.6%

19.3

%18

.8%

20.3

%19

.9%

20

.3%

21

.4%

19.7

%20

.0%

Oth

ers

3.7%

3.

7%

3.5%

3.

4%3.

7%3.

8%3.

6%3.

6%

3.7%

3.

7%3.

6%4.

2%

Pre

-tri

al D

etai

nees

Fel

on

y 30

.4%

31

.4%

31

.5%

31

.6%

32.1

%32

.8%

32.6

%32

.1%

32

.6%

32

.1%

32.1

%33

.0%

Mis

dem

eana

nt

13.2

%

15.1

%

13.9

%

13.9

%13

.8%

12.9

%12

.6%

13.3

%

13.1

%

12.7

%13

.9%

12.8

%

Sou

rce:

TD

OC

Jai

l Sum

mar

y R

epor

t as

of J

une

30, 2

010

LOCAL JAIL CENSUS


NU

MB

ER

% O

FA

VE

RA

GE

NU

MB

ER

% O

FA

VE

RA

GE

NU

MB

ER

% O

FA

VE

RA

GE

NU

MB

ER

% O

FA

VE

RA

GE

OF

TD

OC

SE

NT

EN

CE

OF

TD

OC

SE

NT

EN

CE

OF

LO

CA

LL

YS

EN

TE

NC

EO

FS

YS

TE

M -

SE

NT

EN

CE

PR

IMA

RY

OF

FE

NS

E G

RO

UP

OF

FE

ND

ER

SIN

HO

US

E(Y

Y/M

M)

OF

FE

ND

ER

SB

AC

KU

P(Y

Y/M

M)

OF

FE

ND

ER

SS

EN

TE

NC

ED

(YY

/MM

)O

FF

EN

DE

RS

WID

E(Y

Y/M

M)

H

om

icid

e

M

urd

er

3,7

76

18.7

8%

29

/03

31

0.7

5%

18/0

123

0.6

5%

05/1

03

,83

01

3.8

0%

28/1

0

N

eg

ligen

t M

an

slau

gh

ter

15

0.0

7%

08

/03

40

.10%

04/0

37

0.2

0%

03/1

12

60.0

9%

6/0

6

K

idna

pp

ing

252

1.2

5%

22

/09

11

0.2

7%

11/0

713

0.3

7%

04/1

027

60.9

9%

21/0

4

S

ex

Offe

nse

s

F

orc

ible

2,8

01

13.9

3%

23

/10

92

2.2

3%

08/0

961

1.7

3%

05/0

12

,95

41

0.6

4%

22/1

1

N

on

-Fo

rcib

le1

25

0.6

2%

07

/09

36

0.8

7%

03/0

218

0.5

1%

02/0

817

90.6

4%

06/0

4

A

ssa

ult

A

gg

rava

ted

Ass

ault

2,3

24

11.5

6%

15

/07

322

7.7

9%

05/0

84

38

12

.45

%0

4/0

43

,08

41

1.1

1%

12/1

1

S

imp

le A

ssa

ult

28

0.1

4%

05

/10

39

0.9

4%

02/1

026

0.7

4%

02/0

69

30.3

4%

03/0

8

0

A

rson

104

0.5

2%

14

/01

18

0.4

4%

07/0

57

0.2

0%

04/0

212

90.4

6%

12/0

8

B

urg

lary

1,7

49

8.7

0%

09

/07

678

16

.41%

05/0

36

24

17

.73

%0

3/1

03

,05

11

0.9

9%

07/0

5

F

org

ery

/Fra

ud

317

1.5

8%

07

/04

288

6.9

7%

03/0

71

19

3.3

8%

02/0

972

42.6

1%

05/0

1

L

arc

eny/

Th

eft

821

4.0

8%

07

/08

493

11

.93%

04/0

13

29

9.3

5%

03/0

31

,64

35.9

2%

05/0

8

R

obb

ery

A

gg

rava

ted

Ro

bb

ery

2,6

87

13.3

6%

17

/07

246

5.9

5%

10/0

594

2.6

7%

06/0

73

,02

71

0.9

1%

16/0

7

A

ll O

the

r R

ob

be

ry5

37

2.6

7%

08

/10

106

2.5

7%

06/0

21

46

4.1

5%

05/0

078

92.8

4%

07/0

9

30

.07%

3

D

rug O

ffe

nse

s

C

oca

ine

2,1

00

10.4

4%

12

/05

510

12

.34%

07/1

15

01

14

.24

%0

5/0

13

,11

11

1.2

1%

10/0

6

O

the

r D

rug O

ffen

ses

1,1

50

5.7

2%

10

/04

655

15

.85%

04/1

13

72

10

.57

%0

4/0

22

,17

77.8

4%

07/0

8

V

ehic

ula

r

V

eh

icula

r H

om

icid

e/D

UI

197

0.9

8%

15

/03

20

0.4

8%

07/1

18

0.2

3%

05/0

922

50.8

1%

14/0

3

A

ll O

the

r V

ehic

ula

r67

0.3

3%

05

/04

62

1.5

0%

02/1

129

0.8

2%

02/0

215

80.5

7%

03/0

9

0

C

/S/F

Pe

rson

259

1.2

9%

21

/03

12

0.2

9%

10/0

910

0.2

8%

04/0

628

11.0

1%

20/0

3

C

/S/F

Pro

pert

y103

0.5

1%

08

/04

37

0.9

0%

05/0

045

1.2

8%

04/0

5185

0.6

7%

06/0

8

C

/S/F

So

cie

tal/D

rugs

103

0.5

1%

13

/03

42

1.0

2%

04/0

535

0.9

9%

03/1

018

00.6

5%

09/0

4

E

scape

11

0.0

5%

07/0

711

0.2

7%

04/0

14

0.1

1%

05/0

02

60.0

9%

05/0

8

A

ll O

the

r 5

63

2.8

0%

06

/07

419

10

.14%

03/0

52

68

7.6

2%

03/0

11

,25

04.5

0%

04/0

9

U

nkn

ow

n17

0.0

8%

N/A

00

.00%

00/0

03

42

9.7

2%

00/0

035

91.2

9%

N/A

0

TO

TA

L20

,106

100

%16

/03

4,1

32

10

0%

05/0

73

,519

100

%0

3/0

927

,75

71

00

%1

2/0

9

Sen

tence

Typ

e

D

eath

89

1.4

4%

N/A

00

.00%

N/A

00

.00

%N

/A8

91.1

6%

N/A

L

ife2

,097

34.0

4%

N/A

91

.02%

N/A

00

.00

%N

/A2

,10

62

7.4

6%

N/A

8

5%

3,7

36

60.6

4%

22

/06

51

5.7

7%

14/0

02

0.3

2%

07/0

23

,78

94

9.4

0%

22/0

5

1

-2 Y

ears

239

3.8

8%

01/1

1824

93.2

1%

1/0

96

23

99

.68%

01/0

91

,686

21.9

8%

01/0

9

* 2

,19

5 o

ffe

nd

ers

with

se

nte

nce

s o

f d

ea

th (

89

), a

nd

life

(2

,10

6)

are

incl

ud

ed

in th

e T

DO

C c

ou

nts

; h

ow

eve

r, th

ese

offe

nd

ers

are

no

t in

clu

de

d in

ca

lcu

latio

n o

f a

vera

ge

se

nte

nce

len

gth

s.

Felo

ny

Inm

ate

Po

pu

lati

on

: A

vera

ge T

ota

l S

en

ten

ce L

en

gth

by

Pri

mary

Off

en

se

: F

Y 2

009 -

2010

TD

OC

IN

HO

US

ET

DO

C B

AC

KU

PL

OC

AL

LY

SE

NT

EN

CE

DS

YS

TE

MW

IDE

OTHERPERSON PROPERTY SOCIETAL

Average Sentence Length by Primary Offense In-house Population Detail


Hom

icid

e

M

urde

r 25

42.

32%

23/0

217

0.50

%05

/10

271

1.85

%21

/09

N

eglig

ent M

ansl

augh

ter

160.

15%

04/0

715

0.44

%03

/00

310.

21%

03/1

0

Kid

napp

ing

420.

38%

17/0

114

0.41

%04

/09

560.

38%

14/0

0

Sex

Offe

nses

F

orci

ble

348

3.18

%14

/05

461.

35%

03/1

139

42.

69%

13/0

2

N

on-F

orci

ble

113

1.03

%03

/03

210.

62%

02/0

113

40.

92%

03/0

1

Ass

ault

Agg

rava

ted

Ass

ault

1007

9.21

%08

/00

401

11.7

9%03

/08

1,40

89.

62%

06/0

9

Sim

ple

Ass

ault

100

1.08

%02

/04

661.

94%

01/0

816

61.

13%

02/0

0

Ars

on50

0.46

%07

/00

70.

21%

03/0

257

0.39

%06

/06

Bur

glar

y1,

583

14.4

7%05

/10

655

19.2

6%03

/05

2,23

815

.29%

05/0

2

For

gery

/Fra

ud65

96.

02%

03/1

016

84.

94%

02/0

182

75.

65%

03/0

6

Larc

eny/

The

ft1,

131

10.3

4%04

/06

451

13.2

6%02

/06

1,58

210

.81%

03/1

1

Rob

bery

Agg

rava

ted

Rob

bery

827

7.56

%12

/04

641.

88%

06/0

389

16.

09%

11/1

1

All

Oth

er R

obbe

ry34

93.

19%

06/0

613

64.

00%

04/0

448

53.

31%

05/1

1

Dru

g O

ffens

es

Coc

aine

1,

412

12.9

1%09

/01

415

12.2

1%04

/06

1,82

712

.48%

08/0

1

Oth

er D

rug

Offe

nses

1,50

513

.76%

05/0

839

611

.65%

03/0

11,

901

12.9

9%05

/01

Veh

icul

ar

Veh

icul

ar H

omic

ide/

DU

I50

0.46

%12

/10

40.

12%

06/1

054

0.37

%12

/04

All

Oth

er V

ehic

ular

181

1.65

%02

/07

471.

38%

01/0

822

81.

56%

02/0

5

C/S

/F P

erso

n*63

0.58

%14

/04

90.

26%

02/1

072

0.49

%12

/11

C/S

/F P

rope

rty*

103

0.94

%05

/03

431.

26%

03/0

914

61.

00%

04/1

0

C/S

/F S

ocie

tal/D

rugs

*10

40.

95%

05/0

557

1.68

%03

/01

161

1.10

%04

/07

Esc

ape

140.

13%

03/0

94

0.12

%01

/01

180.

12%

03/0

2

All

Oth

er

1028

9.40

%03

/05

364

10.7

1%02

/03

1,39

29.

51%

03/0

2

Unk

now

n*0

0.00

%N

/A0

0.00

%N

/A29

92.

04%

N/A

TO

TA

L10

,939

100%

07/0

03,

400

100%

03/0

314

,638

100%

06/0

2

Sen

tenc

e T

ype

D

eath

20.

02%

N/A

00.

00%

N/A

20.

01%

N/A

L

ife80

0.73

%N

/A0

0.00

%N

/A80

0.55

%N

/A

8

5%36

43.

33%

22/0

42

0.06

%08

/07

366

2.50

%22

/03

1

-2 Y

ears

2,26

120

.67%

01/0

91,

381

40.6

2%01

/08

3,64

224

.88%

01/0

9

** 8

2 of

fend

ers

with

sen

tenc

es o

f life

(80

) an

d de

ath

(2)

are

incl

uded

in th

e T

DO

C c

ount

s, b

ut a

re n

ot in

clud

ed in

the

calc

ulat

ion

of a

vera

ge s

ente

nce

leng

ths.

Abo

ve c

ount

doe

s no

t inc

lude

299

unp

roce

ssed

judg

emen

t ord

ers.

Tot

al A

dmis

sion

s ar

e 14

,638

.

TD

OC

SE

NT

EN

CE

DL

OC

AL

LY

SE

NT

EN

CE

DS

YS

TE

MW

IDE

Ave

rag

e S

ente

nce

Len

gth

by

Pri

mar

y O

ffen

se G

rou

p:

FY

200

9 -

2010

Fel

on

y A

dm

issi

on

s

PR

IMA

RY

OF

FE

NS

E

GR

OU

PA

vera

ge

Sen

ten

ce

(YY

/MM

)

% O

f L

oca

l T

ota

l

Ave

rag

e S

ente

nce

(Y

Y/M

M)

Sys

tem

-wid

e T

ota

l %

Of

Sys

tem

T

ota

l N

um

ber

of

Off

end

ers

% O

f T

DO

C

To

tal

* C

/S/F

ref

ers

to n

on-s

ubst

antiv

e of

fens

es s

uch

as c

onsi

prac

y, s

olic

itatio

n, fa

cilit

atio

n, a

idin

g, a

nd a

betti

ng, e

tc.

OTHERPERSON PROPERTY SOCIETALA

vera

ge

Sen

ten

ce

(YY

/MM

)

Nu

mb

er o

f O

ffen

der

s

Average Sentence Lengths by Primary Offense Admissions


Hom

icid

e

Mu

rder

246

3.72

%18

/04

210.

46%

08/1

019

0.48

%03

/02

286

1.89

%16

/08

Neg

ligen

t M

ansl

augh

ter

80.

12%

02/1

19

0.20

%01

/08

110.

28%

02/0

328

0.18

%02

/03

Kid

napp

ing

350.

53%

12/0

210

0.22

%04

/04

130.

33%

03/0

258

0.38

%08

/10

Sex

Off

ense

s

Forc

ible

279

4.22

%10

/02

541.

18%

03/1

147

1.18

%02

/03

380

2.51

%08

/04

Non

-Fo

rcib

le50

0.76

%03

/00

501.

10%

01/0

920

0.50

%01

/05

120

0.79

%02

/03

Ass

ault

Agg

rava

ted

Ass

ault

663

10.0

3%06

/05

308

6.76

%03

/01

429

10.8

0%02

/06

1,40

09.

25%

04/0

6

Sim

ple

Assa

ult

410.

62%

02/0

584

1.84

%02

/00

812.

04%

01/0

320

61.

36%

01/1

0

Ars

on50

0.76

%07

/03

200.

44%

03/0

012

0.30

%02

/11

820.

54%

05/0

7

Bur

gla

ry1,

014

15.3

4%05

/02

620

13.6

0%03

/00

656

16.5

2%02

/00

2,29

015

.13%

03/0

8

Forg

ery/

Frau

d26

54.

01%

03/0

739

28.

60%

02/0

322

95.

77%

01/0

688

65.

85%

02/0

6

Larc

eny/

Thef

t62

29.

41%

04/0

353

411

.71%

02/0

452

713

.27%

01/1

01,

683

11.1

2%02

/11

Rob

ber

y

Aggr

avat

ed R

obb

ery

637

9.64

%09

/05

266

5.83

%04

/06

401.

01%

02/0

694

36.

23%

07/0

9

All O

ther

Rob

bery

271

4.10

%05

/06

922.

02%

03/0

112

53.

15%

02/0

848

83.

22%

04/0

4

Dru

g O

ffen

ses

Coca

ine

Off

ense

s1,

076

16.2

8%06

/00

519

11.3

8%03

/11

555

13.9

7%02

/10

2,15

014

.20%

04/0

9

Oth

er D

rug

Off

ense

s64

69.

77%

04/0

075

516

.56%

02/0

654

913

.82%

02/0

01,

950

12.8

8%02

/10

Veh

icu

lar

Vehi

cula

r H

omic

ide/

DU

I47

0.71

%07

/03

90.

20%

05/0

24

0.10

%01

/08

600.

40%

06/0

7

All O

ther

Veh

icul

ar64

0.97

%02

/07

111

2.43

%01

/10

601.

51%

01/0

323

51.

55%

01/1

1

C/S/

F P

erso

n47

0.71

%08

/11

110.

24%

04/0

77

0.18

%02

/06

650.

43%

07/0

6

C/S/

F P

rop

erty

480.

73%

05/0

942

0.92

%02

/08

491.

23%

02/0

113

90.

92%

03/0

8

C/S/

F So

ciet

al/D

rugs

570.

86%

05/0

270

1.54

%02

/06

681.

71%

02/0

719

51.

29%

03/0

4

Esca

pe12

0.18

%03

/05

50.

11%

03/0

67

0.18

%01

/02

240.

16%

02/0

9

All

Oth

er43

16.

52%

03/0

457

712

.66%

02/0

046

411

.68%

01/0

71,

472

9.72

%02

/03

Unk

now

n0

0.00

%N

/A0

0.00

%N

/A0

0.00

%N

/A0

0.00

%N

/A

TOTA

L6,

609

100.

0%06

/03

4,55

910

0.0%

02/1

03,

972

100.

0%02

/01

15,1

4010

0.0%

04/0

2

Aver

age

time

serv

ed d

oes

not i

nclu

de fo

ur (4

) unp

roce

ssed

judg

emen

t ord

ers.

Tot

al re

leas

es a

re 1

5,14

4.

%

Aver

age

Tim

e Se

rved

(Y

Y/M

M)

Num

ber

of

Off

end

ers

%

Aver

age

Tim

e Se

rved

(Y

Y/M

M)

Num

ber

of

Off

end

ers

SOCIETAL OTHER

Ave

rage

Tim

e Se

rved

by

Loca

tion:

FY

2009

- 20

10Fe

lony

Rel

ease

s

%

Aver

age

Tim

e Se

rved

(Y

Y/M

M)

PERSON PROPERTY

%

Aver

age

Tim

e Se

rved

(Y

Y/M

M)

Prim

ary

Off

ense

Cat

egor

y

TDO

C IN

HO

USE

TDO

C BA

CKU

PLO

CALL

Y SE

NTE

NCE

DSY

STEM

WID

E

Num

ber

of

Off

end

ers

Num

ber

of

Off

end

ers

Average Time Served by Primary Offense Releases by Location


Homi

cide

Murd

er13

02.6

8%21

/0813

22.8

2%12

/0314

5.41%

17/09

60.1

4%13

/104

0.37%

03/07

286

1.89%

16/08

Negli

gent

Man

slaug

hter

70.1

4%03

/0111

0.24%

02/05

10.3

9%00

/079

0.21%

01/06

00.0

0%N/

A28

0.18%

02/03

Kidna

pping

200.4

1%11

/0831

0.66%

07/07

10.3

9%16

/115

0.12%

04/09

10.0

9%02

/0158

0.38%

08/10

Sex O

ffens

es

Forci

ble18

13.7

3%07

/0812

82.7

4%10

/0922

8.49%

12/04

461.0

7%02

/073

0.28%

01/08

380

2.51%

08/04

Non-F

orcib

le6

0.12%

04/05

390.8

3%03

/050

0.00%

N/A

731.7

0%01

/062

0.19%

00/04

120

0.79%

02/03

Assa

ult Aggr

avate

d Assa

ult38

88.0

0%06

/0063

413

.57%

04/09

3513

.51%

03/07

285

6.65%

02/02

585.4

0%02

/041,4

009.2

5%04

/06

Simple

Assa

ult21

0.43%

02/06

521.1

1%02

/024

1.54%

00/11

120

2.80%

01/06

90.8

4%02

/0320

61.3

6%01

/10

Arso

n31

0.64%

07/01

280.6

0%06

/082

0.77%

03/00

160.3

7%01

/095

0.47%

02/09

820.5

4%05

/07

Burg

lary

687

14.16

%04

/0885

918

.38%

04/03

207.7

2%04

/0455

612

.98%

01/11

168

15.64

%01

/092,2

9015

.13%

03/08

Forg

ery/F

raud

202

4.16%

03/07

189

4.04%

03/07

93.4

7%01

/0840

19.3

6%01

/0785

7.91%

01/06

886

5.85%

02/06

Larce

ny/Th

eft39

18.0

6%04

/0254

511

.66%

03/07

249.2

7%03

/0860

314

.08%

01/07

120

11.17

%01

/091,6

8311

.12%

02/11

Robb

ery Aggr

avate

d Rob

bery

540

11.13

%07

/1134

87.4

5%07

/1018

6.95%

06/05

280.6

5%04

/089

0.84%

03/01

943

6.23%

07/09

All Ot

her R

obbe

ry19

64.0

4%04

/0817

73.7

9%05

/016

2.32%

03/01

821.9

1%02

/0727

2.51%

02/00

488

3.22%

04/04

Drug

Offen

ses

Coca

ine Of

fense

s1,0

1020

.82%

05/06

455

9.74%

05/05

3814

.67%

03/09

415

9.69%

03/01

232

21.60

%02

/102,1

5014

.20%

04/09

Othe

r Dru

g Offe

nses

582

12.00

%03

/1040

98.7

5%03

/0943

16.60

%02

/1167

515

.76%

01/08

241

22.44

%02

/011,9

5012

.88%

02/10

Vehic

ular

Vehic

ular H

omici

de/D

UI33

0.68%

07/02

230.4

9%06

/050

0.00%

N/A

20.0

5%02

/082

0.19%

00/06

600.4

0%06

/07

All Ot

her V

ehicu

lar22

0.45%

02/06

591.2

6%02

/101

0.39%

02/01

142

3.32%

01/06

111.0

2%01

/0823

51.5

5%01

/11

C/S/F

Perso

n31

0.64%

08/03

270.5

8%07

/050

0.00%

N/A

70.1

6%02

/110

0.00%

N/A

650.4

3%07

/06

C/S/F

Prop

erty

440.9

1%05

/0541

0.88%

04/01

20.7

7%07

/0742

0.98%

01/04

100.9

3%01

/0613

90.9

2%03

/08

C/S/F

Socie

tal/D

rugs

581.2

0%04

/0755

1.18%

03/11

41.5

4%05

/1071

1.66%

01/09

70.6

5%01

/0819

51.2

9%03

/04

Esca

pe5

0.10%

03/02

100.2

1%03

/110

0.00%

N/A

90.2

1%01

/000

0.00%

N/A

240.1

6%02

/09

All Ot

her

266

5.48%

03/03

421

9.01%

03/01

155.7

9%01

/0869

016

.11%

01/05

807.4

5%02

/051,4

729.7

2%02

/03

Unkn

own*

00.0

0%N/

A0

0.00%

N/A

00.0

0%N/

A0

0.00%

N/A

00.0

0%N/

A0

0.00%

N/A

TOTA

L4,8

5110

0.00%

05/08

4,673

100.0

0%04

/1125

910

0.00%

05/02

4283

100.0

0%01

/101,0

7410

0.00%

02/02

15,14

010

0.00%

04/02

Avera

ge tim

e serv

ed do

es no

t inclu

de fo

ur (4)

unpro

cessed

judge

ment

orders

. Tota

l relea

ses ar

e 15,1

44.

SOCIETAL OTHERPERSON PROPERTYAv

erage

Time

Se

rved

(YY/M

M)%

Avera

ge Ti

me

Serve

d (YY

/MM)

Numb

er of

Of

fende

rs%

Numb

er of

Of

fende

rs%

Avera

ge Ti

me

Serve

d (YY

/MM)

Numb

er of

Of

fende

rs

Avera

ge Ti

me

Serve

d (YY

/MM)

Numb

er of

Of

fende

rs%

Avera

ge Ti

me

Serve

d (YY

/MM)

%Av

erage

Time

Se

rved

(YY/M

M)

Numb

er of

Of

fende

rs%

Felon

y Rele

ases

Avera

ge Ti

me Se

rved b

y Rele

ase T

ype:

FY 20

09 - 2

010

PRIM

ARY O

FFEN

SE GR

OUP

PARO

LEEX

PIRAT

IONOT

HER

PROB

ATION

COMM

UNITY

CORR

ECTIO

NSSY

STEM

WIDE

Numb

er of

Of

fende

rs

Average Time Served by Primary Offense Releases by Type


ADMISSIONS AND RELEASES

Yearly Admissions and Releases Fiscal Years 2000 - 2010

0

4,000

8,000

12,000

16,000

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Fiscal Year

# o

f A

dm

issi

on

s &

Rel

ease

s

Adm iss ions

Releases

Both admissions and releases declined in FY 2010. Admissions decreased 0.17% and

releases decreased by 1.85%.

Felony Admissions by Type: FY 2009 -2010

TYPE TDOC % LOCAL % Unknown %

SYSTEM-WIDE %

Returned Escape & Others 120 1.1% 16 0.5% 3 1.0% 139 0.9%

Parole, Probation, & Comm.Corr. Violators 4,282 39.1% 926 27.2% 113 37.8% 5,321 36.4%

New Commitments 6,537 59.8% 2,458 72.3% 183 61.2% 9,178 62.7%

TOTAL 10,939 3,400 299 14,638

Total admissions includes 299 unprocessed judgment orders.

Felony Releases by Type: FY 2009 – 2010

TYPE TDOC % BACK-UP % LOCAL % UNKNOWN* %SYSTEM-

WIDE %

Parole 3,561 53.9% 866 19.0% 424 10.7% 1 33.3% 4,852 32.0%Probation/Community Corrections 812 12.3% 2,353 51.6% 2,192 55.2% 1 33.3% 5,358 35.4%

Sentence Expiration 2,152 32.6% 1,210 26.5% 1,312 33.0% 1 33.3% 4,675 30.9%

Death 52 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 53 0.3%

Other 33 0.5% 129 2.8% 44 1.1% 0 0.0% 206 1.4%

TOTAL 6,610 4,559 3,972 3 15,144


Felony Admissions by Age, Race, and Sex: FY 2009 – 2010

AGE TDOC % LOCAL % Unknown %SYSTEM-

WIDE %

50+ 844 7.7% 284 8.4% 21 7.0% 1149 7.8%40-49 2,125 19.4% 587 17.3% 59 19.7% 2,771 18.9%35-39 1,512 13.8% 393 11.6% 47 15.7% 1,952 13.3%30-34 1,825 16.7% 525 15.4% 72 24.1% 2,422 16.5%25-29 2,174 19.9% 700 20.6% 56 18.7% 2,930 20.0%20-24 2,083 19.0% 730 21.5% 36 12.0% 2,849 19.5%18-19 325 3.0% 155 4.6% 5 1.7% 485 3.3%<18* 51 0.5% 26 0.8% 3 1.0% 80 0.5%

TOTAL 10,939 3,400 299 14,638

RACE TDOC % LOCAL % Unknown %

SYSTEM-WIDE %

Black 3,963 36.2% 2,420 71.2% 129 43.1% 6,512 44.5%White 6,786 62.0% 899 26.4% 165 55.2% 7,850 53.6%Other 190 1.7% 81 2.4% 5 1.7% 276 1.9%

TOTAL 10,939 3,400 299 14,638

GENDER TDOC % LOCAL % Unknown %

SYSTEM-WIDE %

Male 9,390 85.8% 3,014 88.6% 245 81.9% 12,649 86.4%

Female 1,549 14.2% 386 11.4% 54 18.1% 1,989 13.6%

TOTAL 10,939 3,400 299 14,638

Total admissions includes 299 unprocessed judgment orders.

Felony Releases by Age, Race, and Sex: FY 2009 – 2010

AGE TDOC % BACKUP % LOCAL % UNKNOWN %SYSTEM-

WIDE %

50+ 804 12.2% 302 6.6% 341 8.6% 1 33.3% 1,448 9.6%

40-49 1,601 24.2% 901 19.8% 786 19.8% 1 33.3% 3,289 21.7%

35-39 1,014 15.3% 652 14.3% 479 12.1% 0 0.0% 2,145 14.2%

30-34 1,172 17.7% 764 16.8% 707 17.8% 0 0.0% 2,643 17.5%

25-29 1,319 20.0% 1,034 22.7% 810 20.4% 0 0.0% 3,163 20.9%

20-24 672 10.2% 833 18.3% 780 19.6% 0 0.0% 2,285 15.1%

18-19 26 0.4% 71 1.6% 66 1.7% 0 0.0% 163 1.1%

<18 2 0.0% 2 0.0% 3 0.1% 1 33.3% 8 0.1%Unknown 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

TOTAL 6,610 4,559 3,972 3 15,144

RACE TDOC % BACK-UP % LOCAL % UNKNOWN %SYSTEM-

WIDE %

Black 2,641 40.0% 1,421 31.2% 2,492 62.7% 1 33.3% 6,555 43.3%White 3,853 58.3% 3,075 67.4% 1,404 35.3% 1 33.3% 8,333 55.0%Other 116 1.8% 63 1.4% 76 1.9% 1 33.3% 256 1.7%

TOTAL 6,610 4,559 3,972 3 15,144

GENDER TDOC % BACK-UP % LOCAL % UNKNOWN %SYSTEM-

WIDE %

Male 6,029 91.2% 3,592 78.8% 3,394 85.4% 3 100.0% 13,018 86.0%

Female 581 8.8% 967 21.2% 578 14.6% 0 0.0% 2,126 14.0%

TOTAL 6,610 4,559 3,972 3 15,144


.

Ad

mis

sio

ns

by

Geo

gra

ph

ical

Reg

ion

: F

Y 2

009–

2010

The

sys

tem

-wid

e to

tal i

n th

e ab

ove

tabl

e do

es n

ot in

clud

e 29

9 un

proc

esse

d ju

dgm

ent

orde

rs.

Tot

al a

dmis

sion

s ar

e 14

,638

.

TDO

CLO

CA

L FE

LON

SY

STE

M-

WID

E

Wes

t2,

386

2,12

84,

514

Mid

dle

4,32

399

15,

314

Eas

t4,

230

281

4,51

1


Admissions by County of Conviction: FY 2009 - 2010

COUNTY # % # % # % COUNTY # % # % # %

ANDERSON 78 0.7% 2 0.1% 80 0.5% LAUDERDALE 53 0.5% 0 0.0% 53 0.4%

BEDFORD 144 1.3% 1 0.0% 145 1.0% LAWRENCE 72 0.7% 0 0.0% 72 0.5%

BENTON 34 0.3% 0 0.0% 34 0.2% LEWIS 26 0.2% 0 0.0% 26 0.2%

BLEDSOE 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 0.0% LINCOLN 52 0.5% 1 0.0% 53 0.4%

BLOUNT 187 1.7% 6 0.2% 193 1.3% LOUDON 27 0.2% 0 0.0% 27 0.2%

BRADLEY 221 2.0% 0 0.0% 221 1.5% McMINN 165 1.5% 1 0.0% 166 1.1%

CAMPBELL 118 1.1% 1 0.0% 119 0.8% McNAIRY 28 0.3% 2 0.1% 30 0.2%

CANNON 36 0.3% 0 0.0% 36 0.2% MACON 32 0.3% 0 0.0% 32 0.2%

CARROLL 62 0.6% 2 0.1% 64 0.4% MADISON 396 3.6% 6 0.2% 402 2.7%

CARTER 92 0.8% 1 0.0% 93 0.6% MARION 36 0.3% 0 0.0% 36 0.2%

CHEATHAM 75 0.7% 0 0.0% 75 0.5% MARSHALL 82 0.7% 1 0.0% 83 0.6%

CHESTER 32 0.3% 0 0.0% 32 0.2% MAURY 170 1.6% 2 0.1% 172 1.2%

CLAIBORNE 56 0.5% 1 0.0% 57 0.4% MEIGS 11 0.1% 0 0.0% 11 0.1%

CLAY 16 0.1% 0 0.0% 16 0.1% MONROE 126 1.2% 1 0.0% 127 0.9%

COCKE 44 0.4% 1 0.0% 45 0.3% MONTGOMERY 141 1.3% 2 0.1% 143 1.0%

COFFEE 131 1.2% 1 0.0% 132 0.9% MOORE 14 0.1% 0 0.0% 14 0.1%

CROCKETT 25 0.2% 0 0.0% 25 0.2% MORGAN 9 0.1% 0 0.0% 9 0.1%

CUMBERLAND 64 0.6% 0 0.0% 64 0.4% OBION 71 0.6% 0 0.0% 71 0.5%

DAVIDSON 1,205 11.0% 938 27.6% 2143 14.6% OVERTON 38 0.3% 0 0.0% 38 0.3%

DECATUR 19 0.2% 0 0.0% 19 0.1% PERRY 16 0.1% 0 0.0% 16 0.1%

DEKALB 33 0.3% 0 0.0% 33 0.2% PICKETT 8 0.1% 0 0.0% 8 0.1%

DICKSON 104 1.0% 2 0.1% 106 0.7% POLK 23 0.2% 1 0.0% 24 0.2%

DYER 155 1.4% 1 0.0% 156 1.1% PUTNAM 146 1.3% 1 0.0% 147 1.0%

FAYETTE 49 0.4% 0 0.0% 49 0.3% RHEA 21 0.2% 2 0.1% 23 0.2%

FENTRESS 54 0.5% 2 0.1% 56 0.4% ROANE 31 0.3% 1 0.0% 32 0.2%

FRANKLIN 75 0.7% 0 0.0% 75 0.5% ROBERTSON 129 1.2% 1 0.0% 130 0.9%

GIBSON 108 1.0% 1 0.0% 109 0.7% RUTHERFORD 360 3.3% 21 0.6% 381 2.6%

GILES 55 0.5% 1 0.0% 56 0.4% SCOTT 59 0.5% 1 0.0% 60 0.4%

GRAINGER 55 0.5% 1 0.0% 56 0.4% SEQUATCHIE 23 0.2% 0 0.0% 23 0.2%

GREENE 95 0.9% 83 2.4% 178 1.2% SEVIER 148 1.4% 2 0.1% 150 1.0%

GRUNDY 18 0.2% 0 0.0% 18 0.1% SHELBY 856 7.8% 2,109 62.0% 2965 20.3%

HAMBLEN 103 0.9% 131 3.9% 234 1.6% SMITH 32 0.3% 1 0.0% 33 0.2%

HAMILTON 437 4.0% 5 0.1% 442 3.0% STEWART 15 0.1% 0 0.0% 15 0.1%

HANCOCK 29 0.3% 23 0.7% 52 0.4% SULLIVAN 529 4.8% 3 0.1% 532 3.6%

HARDEMAN 68 0.6% 2 0.1% 70 0.5% SUMNER 319 2.9% 4 0.1% 323 2.2%

HARDIN 40 0.4% 0 0.0% 40 0.3% TIPTON 99 0.9% 3 0.1% 102 0.7%

HAWKINS 154 1.4% 1 0.0% 155 1.1% TROUSDALE 24 0.2% 0 0.0% 24 0.2%

HAYWOOD 41 0.4% 0 0.0% 41 0.3% UNICOI 36 0.3% 0 0.0% 36 0.2%

HENDERSON 79 0.7% 0 0.0% 79 0.5% UNION 59 0.5% 2 0.1% 61 0.4%

HENRY 100 0.9% 2 0.1% 102 0.7% VAN BUREN 6 0.1% 0 0.0% 6 0.0%

HICKMAN 43 0.4% 2 0.1% 45 0.3% WARREN 74 0.7% 0 0.0% 74 0.5%

HOUSTON 11 0.1% 0 0.0% 11 0.1% WASHINGTON 220 2.0% 2 0.1% 222 1.5%

HUMPHREYS 29 0.3% 0 0.0% 29 0.2% WAYNE 83 0.8% 0 0.0% 83 0.6%

JACKSON 21 0.2% 1 0.0% 22 0.2% WEAKLEY 48 0.4% 0 0.0% 48 0.3%

JEFFERSON 119 1.1% 7 0.2% 126 0.9% WHITE 17 0.2% 4 0.1% 21 0.1%

JOHNSON 26 0.2% 0 0.0% 26 0.2% WILLIAMSON 205 1.9% 4 0.1% 209 1.4%KNOX 871 8.0% 2 0.1% 873 6.0% WILSON 166 1.5% 1 0.0% 167 1.1%

LAKE 23 0.2% 0 0.0% 23 0.2% 299 2%

TOTAL 10,939 100% 3,400 100% 14,638 100%

Unknown

LOCAL SYSTEM-WIDE TDOC LOCAL SYSTEM-WIDE TDOC


Felon Population by County of Conviction: FY 2009 - 2010

COUNTY # % # % # % # % COUNTY # % # % # % # %

ANDERSON 112 0.6% 26 0.6% 4 0.1% 142 0.5% LAUDERDALE 115 0.6% 19 0.5% 4 0.1% 138 0.5%

BEDFORD 252 1.3% 75 1.8% 4 0.1% 331 1.2% LAWRENCE 123 0.6% 29 0.7% 2 0.1% 154 0.6%

BENTON 40 0.2% 6 0.1% 0 0.0% 46 0.2% LEWIS 39 0.2% 11 0.3% 0 0.0% 50 0.2%

BLEDSOE 27 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 27 0.1% LINCOLN 111 0.6% 21 0.5% 0 0.0% 132 0.5%

BLOUNT 271 1.3% 67 1.6% 8 0.2% 346 1.2% LOUDON 46 0.2% 7 0.2% 9 0.3% 62 0.2%

BRADLEY 283 1.4% 117 2.8% 6 0.2% 406 1.5% McMINN 184 0.9% 91 2.2% 12 0.3% 287 1.0%

CAMPBELL 161 0.8% 52 1.3% 5 0.1% 218 0.8% McNAIRY 53 0.3% 11 0.3% 0 0.0% 64 0.2%

CANNON 34 0.2% 21 0.5% 1 0.0% 56 0.2% MACON 29 0.1% 19 0.5% 1 0.0% 49 0.2%

CARROLL 101 0.5% 12 0.3% 1 0.0% 114 0.4% MADISON 716 3.6% 42 1.0% 11 0.3% 769 2.8%

CARTER 83 0.4% 49 1.2% 21 0.6% 153 0.6% MARION 74 0.4% 20 0.5% 1 0.0% 95 0.3%

CHEATHAM 94 0.5% 30 0.7% 3 0.1% 127 0.5% MARSHALL 206 1.0% 25 0.6% 0 0.0% 231 0.8%

CHESTER 73 0.4% 4 0.1% 2 0.1% 79 0.3% MAURY 367 1.8% 34 0.8% 0 0.0% 401 1.4%

CLAIBORNE 101 0.5% 35 0.8% 4 0.1% 140 0.5% MEIGS 9 0.0% 4 0.1% 1 0.0% 14 0.1%

CLAY 11 0.1% 4 0.1% 1 0.0% 16 0.1% MONROE 100 0.5% 82 2.0% 3 0.1% 185 0.7%

COCKE 142 0.7% 16 0.4% 2 0.1% 160 0.6% MONTGOMERY 353 1.8% 49 1.2% 4 0.1% 406 1.5%

COFFEE 234 1.2% 29 0.7% 7 0.2% 270 1.0% MOORE 27 0.1% 6 0.1% 1 0.0% 34 0.1%

CROCKETT 49 0.2% 10 0.2% 1 0.0% 60 0.2% MORGAN 20 0.1% 4 0.1% 0 0.0% 24 0.1%

CUMBERLAND 109 0.5% 14 0.3% 1 0.0% 124 0.4% OBION 109 0.5% 28 0.7% 1 0.0% 138 0.5%

DAVIDSON 3,409 17.0% 317 7.7% 879 25.0% 4605 16.6% OVERTON 38 0.2% 35 0.8% 2 0.1% 75 0.3%

DECATUR 37 0.2% 8 0.2% 0 0.0% 45 0.2% PERRY 25 0.1% 9 0.2% 0 0.0% 34 0.1%

DEKALB 57 0.3% 11 0.3% 4 0.1% 72 0.3% PICKETT 8 0.0% 4 0.1% 0 0.0% 12 0.0%

DICKSON 167 0.8% 24 0.6% 2 0.1% 193 0.7% POLK 32 0.2% 25 0.6% 0 0.0% 57 0.2%

DYER 185 0.9% 75 1.8% 1 0.0% 261 0.9% PUTNAM 175 0.9% 73 1.8% 3 0.1% 251 0.9%

FAYETTE 68 0.3% 27 0.7% 2 0.1% 97 0.3% RHEA 55 0.3% 10 0.2% 4 0.1% 69 0.2%

FENTRESS 47 0.2% 29 0.7% 1 0.0% 77 0.3% ROANE 76 0.4% 19 0.5% 7 0.2% 102 0.4%

FRANKLIN 106 0.5% 21 0.5% 5 0.1% 132 0.5% ROBERTSON 210 1.0% 26 0.6% 9 0.3% 245 0.9%

GIBSON 175 0.9% 22 0.5% 1 0.0% 198 0.7% RUTHERFORD 565 2.8% 111 2.7% 15 0.4% 691 2.5%

GILES 110 0.5% 24 0.6% 2 0.1% 136 0.5% SCOTT 72 0.4% 54 1.3% 1 0.0% 127 0.5%

GRAINGER 67 0.3% 33 0.8% 0 0.0% 100 0.4% SEQUATCHIE 46 0.2% 15 0.4% 2 0.1% 63 0.2%

GREENE 137 0.7% 65 1.6% 42 1.2% 244 0.9% SEVIER 227 1.1% 90 2.2% 11 0.3% 328 1.2%

GRUNDY 44 0.2% 5 0.1% 2 0.1% 51 0.2% SHELBY 2954 14.7% 510 12.3% 1,796 51.0% 5260 19.0%

HAMBLEN 162 0.8% 36 0.9% 47 1.3% 245 0.9% SMITH 43 0.2% 21 0.5% 0 0.0% 64 0.2%

HAMILTON 786 3.9% 95 2.3% 15 0.4% 896 3.2% STEWART 27 0.1% 6 0.1% 3 0.1% 36 0.1%

HANCOCK 17 0.1% 19 0.5% 10 0.3% 46 0.2% SULLIVAN 713 3.5% 253 6.1% 18 0.5% 984 3.5%

HARDEMAN 111 0.6% 20 0.5% 6 0.2% 137 0.5% SUMNER 428 2.1% 168 4.1% 46 1.3% 642 2.3%

HARDIN 65 0.3% 27 0.7% 2 0.1% 94 0.3% TIPTON 171 0.9% 21 0.5% 10 0.3% 202 0.7%

HAWKINS 113 0.6% 64 1.5% 2 0.1% 179 0.6% TROUSDALE 26 0.1% 15 0.4% 0 0.0% 41 0.1%

HAYWOOD 63 0.3% 12 0.3% 2 0.1% 77 0.3% UNICOI 33 0.2% 15 0.4% 8 0.2% 56 0.2%

HENDERSON 123 0.6% 10 0.2% 2 0.1% 135 0.5% UNION 78 0.4% 22 0.5% 1 0.0% 101 0.4%

HENRY 133 0.7% 31 0.8% 2 0.1% 166 0.6% VAN BUREN 15 0.1% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 17 0.1%

HICKMAN 77 0.4% 15 0.4% 2 0.1% 94 0.3% WARREN 190 0.9% 27 0.7% 1 0.0% 218 0.8%

HOUSTON 18 0.1% 8 0.2% 4 0.1% 30 0.1% WASHINGTON 220 1.1% 121 2.9% 38 1.1% 379 1.4%

HUMPHREYS 66 0.3% 5 0.1% 1 0.0% 72 0.3% WAYNE 80 0.4% 21 0.5% 0 0.0% 101 0.4%

JACKSON 26 0.1% 7 0.2% 0 0.0% 33 0.1% WEAKLEY 62 0.3% 27 0.7% 0 0.0% 89 0.3%

JEFFERSON 143 0.7% 89 2.2% 8 0.2% 240 0.9% WHITE 48 0.2% 13 0.3% 5 0.1% 66 0.2%

JOHNSON 20 0.1% 9 0.2% 6 0.2% 35 0.1% WILLIAMSON 270 1.3% 43 1.0% 1 0.0% 314 1.1%KNOX 1519 7.6% 116 2.8% 24 0.7% 1659 6.0% WILSON 269 1.3% 70 1.7% 2 0.1% 341 1.2%

LAKE 24 0.1% 13 0.3% 0 0.0% 37 0.1% *UNKNOWN 17 0% 0 0% 341 10% 358 1.3%

TOTAL 20,106 100% 4132 100% 3,519 90% 27,757 100%

LOCAL SYSTEMWIDE TDOC LOCAL SYSTEMWIDE TDOC BACKUP BACKUP

Offender Accountability

Programs & Services

Offender Accountability, Programs & Services 39

HOURS AND VALUE OF COMMUNITY SERVICE WORK

Total Hours and Estimated Value of Community Service Work

0

200,000

400,000

600,000

800,000

1,000,000

1,200,000

1,400,000

1,600,000

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Fiscal Year

Ho

urs

$0

$1,000,000

$2,000,000

$3,000,000

$4,000,000

$5,000,000

$6,000,000

$7,000,000

$8,000,000

Val

ue

Total Hours

Value

Community Service Hours Worked by Facility: FY 2009 - 2010

1st Quarter

2nd Quarter

3rd Quarter

4th Quarter

Facility Total

CBCX 47,564 40,080 37,502 43,231 168,377

HCCF 2,205 2,779 677 1,232 6,893

MCCX 33,304 27,664 26,804 30,966 118,738

MLCC 4,498 4,986 4,500 3,976 17,960

NECX 39,943 37,846 35,625 40,224 153,638

NWCX 15,744 14,550 13,518 13,805 57,617

SCCF 8,073 4,915 4,115 2,680 19,783

STSR 9,246 7,536 7,716 9,054 33,552

TPFW 33,753 28,769 30,957 32,955 126,434

TCIX 42,910 32,860 29,397 40,263 145,430

WTSP 2,880 3,609 2,368 4,360 13,217

SYSTEM 240,120 205,594 193,179 222,746 861,639

$6,246,882.75 TOTAL SAVINGS: Dollar Value @ Minimum Wage

Note: Minimum wage = $7.25/hr.


INMATE ASSIGNMENTS

Assignment Inmates % of PopulationAcademic Education 2,036 10.1%Vocational Programs 1,552 7.7%Support 5,623 27.9%Program Services 1,272 6.3%Recycling 187 0.9%TRICOR 880 0.4%Work Lines 324 0.2%Other Agencies 150 0.7%

Community Service 446 2.2%Work Release 62 0.0%Cognitive Behavioral Programming 66 0.0%Behavioral Programming 1,159 5.8%Mental Health Programs 359 1.8%Tech. Violators Diversion Program 46 0.0%Transitional Center Programming 83 0.0%Boot Camp 38 0.0%

Pre-Release 472 2.3%Other 767 3.8%Total Assigned 15,522 77%Unassignable Status* 2,875 14.2%Job Waiting List 1,729 8.6%

TOTAL INMATES 20,126 100%% of Eligible Inmates Assigned 90.0%

in segregation or classification, etc.*Inmates who can not be assigned due to their status, which may include those

INMATE ASSIGNMENTSJune 30, 2010


DRUG SCREENS: FY 2009 – 2010 Random drug screens are conducted monthly on 2.5% of the inmate population. These screens are necessary to identify the use of contraband substances frequently found in prison. In addition, substance abuse program participants are randomly selected for regularly scheduled drug tests. All positive screens are confirmed through additional testing, and graduated sanctions are used for any positive drug screen.

1st 1247 50 4.01% 3.50% 5.17%2nd 1662 67 4.03% 4.42% 5.98%3rd 1833 76 4.15% 4.63% 6.76%4th 1623 77 4.74% 6.90% 7.90%

SA Program Average FY 2010

1.72%

FY 2010

QuarterNumber Tested

# Positive/ Refused

% Positive/ Refused

FY 2009 %

Positive

FY 2008 %

Positive

0.00%

1.00%

2.00%

3.00%

4.00%

5.00%

6.00%

7.00%

8.00%

% P

osi

tive

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Year

General Population v. SA Program Random Drug Test Averages

GP 2007-08 GP 2008-09 GP 2009-10 SA Program Average 09-10


EDUCATION: FY 2009 – 2010

Full-Time Part-Time Full-time Part-Time

CBCX 21 35 0 4 0 0 0 60DSNF 0 137 0 0 5 0 0 142HCCF 1457 0 0 0 0 562 0 2019MCCX 1051 0 0 295 33 355 0 1734MLCC 189 0 0 7 11 131 0 338NECX 289 14 0 18 75 253 229 878NWCX 1008 0 0 32 0 130 751 1921RMSI 188 24 0 67 14 114 0 407SCCF 854 0 0 0 0 711 0 1565

STSRCF 207 17 0 69 3 215 0 511TCIX 339 0 0 0 22 346 0 707

TPFW 192 0 0 0 52 156 0 400WCFA 813 0 0 0 1 414 0 1228WTSP 743 0 128 44 2 753 0 1670

YEARLY TOTALS 7351 227 128 536 218 4140 980 13580

VOCATIONAL ABE/GED

EDUCATIONAL ENROLLMENT: FY 2009-2010

VOLUNTEER LITERACYINSTITUTION

SEGREGATED Closed Circuit

TV COLLEGE* TOTAL

VOCATIONALTested # Passing % Passed # Graduates

CBCX 24 20 83.3% 0DSNF 17 7 41.2% 0HCCF 137 83 60.6% 191MLCC 26 21 80.8% 26MCCX 123 94 76.4% 114NECX 121 79 65.3% 75NWCX 102 68 66.7% 334RMSI 25 15 60.0% 48SCCF 115 79 68.7% 143

STSRCF 54 24 44.4% 124TCIP 84 58 69.0% 162TPW 29 22 75.9% 27

WTSP 119 77 64.7% 164WCFA 97 63 64.9% 177

SYSTEM-WIDE TOTAL 1073 710 66.2% 1585

INSTITUTIONGED

TEST RESULTS: FY 2009-2010

FY 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

G.E.D 766 511 326 606 598 464 685 786 737 710Vocational 692 865 425 1434 1765 1473 1365 1342 1468 1585

GED & Vocational Certificates: FY 2001-2010


Table 2: FY'09-10

Pharmacy Costs: $11.2 million% of Cost by Drug Class

18%

15%

9%

8%8%

7%

7%

7%

7%

5%5%

4%HIV

Misc.

Cardiac

Psych

Vaccine

Hep C

Asthma

Gastro.

Diabetes

Analgesic

Antibiotic

Seizure

CLINICAL SERVICES DIVISION Health Services Upon intake into our prison system, all offenders receive extensive medical and dental screening and testing to identify their health status and treatment needs. Each of the Department’s fourteen facilities maintains an on-site health clinic that provides a full range of medical, dental and mental health services. In FY 2010, there were 916 hospital admissions resulting in an average length of stay (ALOS) of 3.9 days.

Table 1:Hospital Admissions

916

12501266

11791007

0

200

400

600800

1000

1200

1400

FY06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 FY 10

Fiscal Year

Pharmaceutical costs for FY 2010 totaled $11.2 million, representing a significant percentage of the Department’s total health care budget. The costs can be primarily attributed to the treatment of HIV, which accounted for approximately $2 million (see Table 2).


Mental Health Services The Office of Mental Health Services sets policy standards for the delivery of mental health treatment and evaluates the care provided throughout the TDOC system. There are approximately 6,384 mentally ill inmates diagnosed within the TDOC system, an increase of almost 7% from the previous fiscal year.

Table 3: Major DSM Groups Actual Population

Last Six Fiscal Years

955 756 741 837 891 978

1471 1784 1999 2367 2656 2830

2661 2685 2702 2475 2419 2576

01000200030004000500060007000

04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10

Fiscal Years

To

tal D

SM

Po

pu

lati

on

All Other

SPMI

ALC/ SUB

Table 4 provides data on the psychiatry and psychology services delivered. In FY 2010, 50,595 mental health services were provided, which is a 5% increase over the previous fiscal year. Psychiatric medication management accounts for 8% of the Department’s pharmaceutical expenditures.

Table 4: Psychiatry & Psychology Services Delivered at

State Managed Facilities

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr

Fiscal Year Quarter

Nu

mb

er o

f

En

cou

nte

rs 2006-2007

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Institutions

Commissioner Gayle Ray leads the groundbreaking ceremony for the new state-of-the-art Bledsoe County Correctional Complex. The facility will have the capacity to

house more than 1,444 inmates and create approximately 500 new jobs for Bledsoe andsurrounding counties. Other participants in the ceremony include (pictured left to right)Warden Jim Morrow, Deputy Commissioner David Mills, Director of Facilities Tom Robinson,and Assistant Commissioner Reuben Hodge.

Institutional Demographics 47

Lake

Obi

on Gib

son

Tipt

on

Laud

erda

le

Dye

r

Wea

kley

Shel

by

Cro

cket

t

Hay

woo

d

McN

airy

Dav

idso

nD

avid

son

Hamilto

n

Kno

xK

nox

Faye

tteH

arde

man

Mad

ison C

hest

erHen

der-

son

Har

dinDecatur

Hen

ry

Car

roll

Stew

art

Hou

ston

Mon

t-go

mer

yR

ober

tson

Humphreys

Dic

kson

Cheatham

Hic

kman

Perr

y

Will

iam

son

Sum

ner

Wils

on

Ruth

erfo

rd

Lew

isM

aury

Marshall

Way

ne

Lawrence

Gile

sLi

ncol

n

Cof

fee

Bed

ford

Trou

Moore

Mar

ion

Fran

klin

BradleyMcM

inn

Sequat .

Gru

ndy

Meigs

Polk

Mac

on

Ove

rton

Jack

-so

nSm

ith

Cla

yPi

cket

t Fent

ress

DeK

albPu

tnam

Cannon

Was

h-in

gton

War

ren

Whi

te

Cum

berla

nd

Rhea

Bledsoe

Van

B

uren

Scot

tC

ampb

ell

Cla

ibor

neH

anc.

Johnson

Haw

kins

Car

ter

Unico

iG

reen

e

Coc

ke

Sevi

erB

loun

t

Mon

roe

Loud

on

Roa

ne

Mor

gan

And

erso

nUni

onG

rain

ger H

amb.

Jeff

erso

n

Sulli

van

Benton

1

2

3

4

5

67

8

9

10

Lake

Obi

on Gib

son

Tipt

on

Laud

erda

le

Dye

r

Wea

kley

Shel

by

Cro

cket

t

Hay

woo

d

McN

airy

Dav

idso

nD

avid

son

Hamilto

n

Kno

xK

nox

Faye

tteH

arde

man

Mad

ison C

hest

erHen

der-

son

Har

dinDecatur

Hen

ry

Car

roll

Stew

art

Hou

ston

Mon

t-go

mer

yR

ober

tson

Humphreys

Dic

kson

Cheatham

Hic

kman

Perr

y

Will

iam

son

Sum

ner

Wils

on

Ruth

erfo

rd

Lew

isM

aury

Marshall

Way

ne

Lawrence

Gile

sLi

ncol

n

Cof

fee

Bed

ford

Trou

Moore

Mar

ion

Fran

klin

BradleyMcM

inn

Sequat .

Gru

ndy

Meigs

Polk

Mac

on

Ove

rton

Jack

-so

nSm

ith

Cla

yPi

cket

t Fent

ress

DeK

albPu

tnam

Cannon

Was

h-in

gton

War

ren

Whi

te

Cum

berla

nd

Rhea

Bledsoe

Van

B

uren

Scot

tC

ampb

ell

Cla

ibor

neH

anc.

Johnson

Haw

kins

Car

ter

Unico

iG

reen

e

Coc

ke

Sevi

erB

loun

t

Mon

roe

Loud

on

Roa

ne

Mor

gan

And

erso

nUni

onG

rain

ger H

amb.

Jeff

erso

n

Sulli

van

Benton

1

2

3

4

5

67

8

9

10

Clo

seN

orth

wes

t C

orr

ectio

nal C

ompl

ex

10.

Lake

Ma

xim

umW

est T

enne

ssee

Sta

te P

enite

ntia

ry9.

Lau

derd

ale

Clo

seM

ark

Lu

ttre

ll C

orre

ctio

nal

Cen

ter

8. S

helb

y

Me

dium

Me

dium

Har

dem

an C

oun

ty C

orre

ctio

nal

Fa

cilit

y

Whi

tevi

lle C

orre

ctio

nal

Fa

cilit

y

7. H

arde

man

Clo

seS

outh

Cen

tral

Co

rrec

tiona

l Fac

ility

6. W

ayne

Clo

seT

urne

y C

ente

r In

dust

rial C

ompl

ex

5. H

ickm

an

Clo

se

Ma

xim

um

Ma

xim

um

Ma

xim

um

Cha

rles

Bas

s C

orr

ectio

nal

Com

ple

x

DeB

erry

Spe

cial

Ne

eds

Fac

ility

Riv

erbe

nd

Ma

xim

um S

ecu

rity

Inst

itutio

n

Ten

ness

ee P

riso

n fo

r W

omen

4. D

avid

son

Clo

seS

outh

eas

tern

Ten

ness

ee S

tate

Reg

ion

al C

orre

ctio

nal F

aci

lity

3. B

leds

oe

Ma

xim

umM

org

an C

oun

ty C

orre

ctio

nal

Com

ple

x2.

Mo

rga

n

Ma

xim

umN

orth

east

Co

rrec

tiona

l Com

ple

x1.

Joh

nson

Se

cu

rity

L

eve

lF

ac

ilit

yC

ou

nty

Clo

seN

orth

wes

t C

orr

ectio

nal C

ompl

ex

10.

Lake

Ma

xim

umW

est T

enne

ssee

Sta

te P

enite

ntia

ry9.

Lau

derd

ale

Clo

seM

ark

Lu

ttre

ll C

orre

ctio

nal

Cen

ter

8. S

helb

y

Me

dium

Me

dium

Har

dem

an C

oun

ty C

orre

ctio

nal

Fa

cilit

y

Whi

tevi

lle C

orre

ctio

nal

Fa

cilit

y

7. H

arde

man

Clo

seS

outh

Cen

tral

Co

rrec

tiona

l Fac

ility

6. W

ayne

Clo

seT

urne

y C

ente

r In

dust

rial C

ompl

ex

5. H

ickm

an

Clo

se

Ma

xim

um

Ma

xim

um

Ma

xim

um

Cha

rles

Bas

s C

orr

ectio

nal

Com

ple

x

DeB

erry

Spe

cial

Ne

eds

Fac

ility

Riv

erbe

nd

Ma

xim

um S

ecu

rity

Inst

itutio

n

Ten

ness

ee P

riso

n fo

r W

omen

4. D

avid

son

Clo

seS

outh

eas

tern

Ten

ness

ee S

tate

Reg

ion

al C

orre

ctio

nal F

aci

lity

3. B

leds

oe

Ma

xim

umM

org

an C

oun

ty C

orre

ctio

nal

Com

ple

x2.

Mo

rga

n

Ma

xim

umN

orth

east

Co

rrec

tiona

l Com

ple

x1.

Joh

nson

Se

cu

rity

L

eve

lF

ac

ilit

yC

ou

nty

TD

OC

Fac

ilitie

s an

d S

ecur

ity D

esig

natio

ns: J

une

30, 2

010

Num

ber

Per

cent

Cus

tody

ofof

Leve

lO

ffen

ders

Tota

l

Max

imum

1,01

3

5.

0%C

lose

670

3.

3%M

ediu

m14

,534

72

.3%

Min

imum

3,38

2

16

.8%

Unc

lass

ified

507

2.

5%TO

TAL

20,1

06

100.

0%


InstitutionAverage Daily

Population

Charles Bass Correctional Complex 989

DeBerry Special Needs Facility 704

Hardeman County Correctional Facility 1985

Mark Luttrell Correctional Center 418

Morgan County Correctional Complex 2162

Northeast Correctional Complex 1816

Northwest Correctional Complex 2350

Riverbend Maximum Security Institution 703

South Central Correctional Facility 1648

Southeastern TN State Regional Corr. Facility 924

Tennessee Prison for Women 761

Turney Center Industrial Complex 1536

Whiteville Correctional Facility 1516West Tennessee State Penitentiary 2492

System Total 20004Source: TDOC Bedspace and Operating Capacities Report

Average Daily Population: FY 2009 - 2010

Demographics by Facility

June 30, 2010

<20 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-49 50+ Avg Age Black WhiteOther/

Unknown Male Female

CBCX 11 95 122 129 134 221 140 38.0 459 382 11 852 0

DSNF 1 43 73 76 78 137 208 43.4 246 352 18 616 0

HCCF 21 260 328 356 309 427 290 36.7 1,132 814 45 1991 0

MCCX 25 324 419 439 326 517 331 36.4 811 1,529 41 2381 0

MLCC 4 46 80 91 76 96 35 35.3 178 245 5 0 428

NECX 5 154 261 305 263 502 317 38.8 462 1,303 42 1,807 0

NWCX 99 325 358 340 336 564 389 36.9 1,152 1,175 84 2,411 0

RMSI 0 48 105 119 120 174 125 39.1 361 317 13 691 0

SCCF 13 214 325 300 239 333 214 36.0 738 818 82 1,638 0

STSR 1 61 117 165 143 252 195 39.9 323 599 12 934 0

TCIX 14 203 275 275 250 364 204 36.5 868 668 49 1,585 0

TPFW 4 73 124 143 131 175 106 37.2 184 560 12 0 756

WCFA 23 249 277 279 175 346 174 35.4 949 545 29 1,523 0

WTSP 36 395 468 459 355 519 261 34.9 1,531 897 65 2,493 0

SYSTEM 257 2,490 3,332 3,476 2,935 4,627 2,989 37.5 9,394 10,204 508 18,922 1,184

AGE RACE GENDER


Facility Populations by Primary Offense: June 30, 2010

CBCX DSNF HCCF MCCX MLCC NECX NWCX RMSI SCCF STSRC TCIX TPW WCFA WTSPFacility Population 852 616 1,991 2,381 428 1,807 2,411 691 1,638 934 1,585 756 1,523 2,493

OFFENSEPERSON OFFENSES 26% 62% 53% 45% 37% 52% 49% 64% 40% 63% 40% 40% 42% 43%

Homicide 8% 21% 17% 19% 22% 24% 17% 43% 12% 29% 18% 21% 13% 19%

Kidnapping 2% 1% 1% 1% 0% 2% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%

Sex Offenses 6% 30% 23% 12% 1% 14% 19% 10% 16% 25% 11% 4% 15% 10%

Assault 10% 9% 12% 12% 13% 12% 12% 10% 10% 9% 10% 14% 14% 13%

PROPERTY OFFENSES 38% 21% 29% 32% 34% 28% 32% 25% 30% 21% 32% 29% 34% 36%

Arson 0% 1% 0% 1% 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0%

Burglary 13% 6% 7% 11% 6% 10% 9% 3% 10% 5% 8% 7% 9% 10%

Forgery/Fraud 3% 1% 1% 1% 8% 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% 6% 1% 2%

Larceny/Theft 7% 2% 3% 6% 6% 5% 4% 1% 4% 2% 4% 7% 3% 4%

Robbery 14% 12% 18% 13% 13% 12% 18% 20% 15% 13% 18% 8% 20% 20%

SOCIETAL OFFENSES 29% 13% 14% 18% 19% 15% 14% 9% 24% 12% 23% 21% 19% 16%

Drugs/Narcotics 28% 12% 13% 17% 17% 13% 13% 9% 23% 11% 22% 17% 18% 15%

Vehicular Homicide/DUI 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 3% 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% 3% 1% 1%

ALL OTHER OFFENSES 7% 4% 5% 6% 10% 5% 5% 2% 6% 3% 5% 11% 5% 5%

C/S/F Person* 1% 0% 1% 1% 3% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 4% 1% 1%

C/S/F Property* 1% 0% 1% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 1% 2% 1% 0%

C/S/F Societal* 2% 0% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0%

Escape 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

All Other** 4% 3% 3% 4% 3% 4% 3% 1% 3% 2% 2% 4% 3% 3%TOTAL 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%**Includes 17 unprocessed judgement orders. * C/S/F = Refers to non-substantive offenses such as conspiracy, solicitation, facilitation, aiding and abetting, etc.

Incidents: FY 2009 – 2010

1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr Total

Rape 0 0 0 2 2Weapon Offenses 230 206 188 229 853Drug Offenses 201 187 213 239 840STG Offenses 159 150 176 160 645Riot 0 0 0 0 0Sexual Misconduct 175 204 205 209 793

Assault

Assault on Offender 99 106 123 137 465Assault on Staff 143 172 157 140 612Death

Homicide 0 0 0 1 1Suicide 1 1 1 0 3Accidental Death 0 0 0 0 0Natural Death 15 15 19 18 67Lethal Injection 0 1 0 0 1Escape

Secure Supervision 0 0 0 0 0Minimum Security 0 3 1 0 4Minimum Security - Work Crew - Supervised 0 1 0 2 3Minimum Security - Work Crew - Unsupervised 0 0 0 0 0Furlough/Pass 0 0 0 0 0

Non-Violent Incident Rate (per 100 inmates) 18.01 16.84 16.21 16.93 67.96Violent Incident Rate (per 100 inmates) 2.07 2.04 1.96 2.03 8.10Total Incident Rate (per 100 inmates) 20.08 18.88 18.16 18.97 76.06


CB

CX

HC

CF

MC

CX

ML

RC

NE

CX

NW

CX

RM

SISC

CF

SPN

DST

SRT

CIX

TPF

WW

CFA

WTS

PSY

STE

M

Cha

rles B

ass

Cor

rect

iona

l C

ompl

ex

Har

dem

an

Cou

nty

Cor

rect

iona

l Fa

cilit

y

Mor

gan

Cou

nty

Cor

rect

iona

l C

ompl

ex

Mar

k H

. Lu

ttrel

l C

ente

r

Nor

thea

st

Cor

rect

iona

l Co

mpl

ex

Nor

thw

est

Cor

rect

iona

l C

ompl

ex

Riv

erbe

nd

Max

imum

Se

curit

y In

stitu

tion

Sout

h C

entra

l C

orre

ctio

nal

Faci

lity

DeB

erry

Sp

ecia

l N

eeds

Fa

cilit

y

Sout

heas

tern

TN

St

ate

Turn

ey

Cen

ter

Indu

stria

l C

ompl

ex

TN P

rison

for

Wom

en

Whi

tevi

lle

Cor

rect

iona

l Fa

cilit

y

Wes

t TN

Sta

te

Peni

tent

iary

Ave

rage

Pop

ulat

ion

968

1963

2149

413

1782

2315

695

1618

694

917

1514

752

1486

2443

1970

8In

c Ty

peIn

cide

nt D

escr

iptio

nA

rres

tA

BT

FUR

L/P

ASS

-VIO

LE

NT

CR

IME

0A

rres

tA

BS

FUR

L/P

ASS

-FE

LO

NY

0A

rres

tA

BM

FUR

L/P

ASS

-MIS

DE

ME

AN

OR

0A

rres

tA

FOFE

LON

Y-O

FN0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Arr

est

AFS

FELO

NY

-STA

FF0

10

02

00

40

00

03

212

Arr

est

AFV

FELO

NY

-VIS

ITO

R0

100

09

30

32

16

00

943

Ars

on*

AR

ISE

R-I

NJ-

PRO

P D

MG

>$50

0-O

PER

DIS

RU

P0

01

00

00

00

00

00

01

Ars

on*

AR

DIN

JUR

Y-P

RO

P D

MG

/$50

0-O

PR D

ISR

UP

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0A

rson

*A

RP

PRO

P D

MG

>$50

00

00

00

10

00

10

01

03

Ass

ault

*A

SAST

AFF

-SER

IOU

S IN

JUR

Y0

02

02

32

00

00

00

09

Ass

ault

*A

SBST

AFF

-IN

JURY

11

51

37

107

101

50

31

55A

ssau

lt*

ASC

STA

FF-M

INO

R IN

JUR

Y5

717

210

1215

1029

217

79

4218

4A

ssau

lt*

ASJ

STA

FF-N

O IN

JUR

Y1

1236

513

2950

1289

320

518

7136

4A

ssau

lt*

ASD

OFN

-SER

IOU

S IN

JURY

17

23

36

16

02

22

17

43A

ssau

lt*

ASE

OFN

-IN

JUR

Y3

1510

62

102

141

48

128

1011

4A

ssau

lt*

ASF

OFN

-MIN

OR

INJU

RY7

1117

617

361

1511

58

1111

2718

3A

ssau

lt*

ASK

OFN

-NO

INJU

RY

16

207

317

164

160

27

224

125

Ass

ault

*A

SGV

IS-S

ERIO

US

INJU

RY

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0A

ssau

lt*

ASH

VIS

-IN

JURY

01

10

00

00

00

00

00

2A

ssau

lt*

ASI

VIS

-MIN

OR

INJU

RY

01

00

00

01

01

00

02

5A

ssau

lt*

ASM

VIS

-NO

INJU

RY

01

40

00

00

00

00

00

5D

eath

DEA

OFN

-NA

TUR

AL

11

10

43

00

511

11

12

67D

eath

DEC

DEA

TH-O

FN-E

XEC

-ELE

C C

HR

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0D

eath

*D

EHO

FN-H

OM

ICID

E0

10

00

00

00

00

00

01

Dea

thD

EIO

FN-E

XEC

-LET

H IN

J0

00

00

01

00

00

00

01

Dea

th*

DES

OFN

-SU

ICID

E0

02

00

00

00

10

00

03

Dea

thD

OA

OFN

-AC

CID

ENT

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0D

eath

*D

EGST

AFF

-HO

MIC

IDE

(ON

DU

TY)

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0D

eath

*D

EFST

AFF

-SU

ICID

E (O

N D

UTY

)0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Dea

thD

EDST

AFF

-AC

CID

ENT

(ON

DU

TY)

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0D

eath

DET

STA

FF (O

N D

UTY

)-N

ATU

RA

L0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Dea

thD

EVV

ISIT

OR

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0D

eath

*D

VH

VIS

ITO

R-H

OM

ICID

E0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Dea

th*

DV

SV

ISIT

OR-

SUIC

IDE

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0D

eath

DV

AV

ISIT

OR-

AC

CID

ENT

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0D

eath

DV

NV

ISIT

OR-

NA

TUR

AL

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0D

istu

rban

ceD

ILTE

MP.

CO

NTR

OL

LOSS

10

00

00

00

00

11

00

3D

istu

rban

ceD

IRTH

REA

T C

ON

TRO

L LO

SS0

03

01

01

01

01

03

111

Dis

turb

ance

DIS

MIN

OR

3240

140

213

132

338

7829

173

3721

996

203

243

2558

TD

OC

INC

IDE

NT

SU

MM

AR

Y:

FY

2009

-201

0


CBC

XH

CC

FM

CC

XM

LRC

NEC

XN

WC

XR

MSI

SCC

FSP

ND

STSR

TCIX

TPFW

WC

FAW

TSP

SYST

EM

Char

les B

ass

Corre

ctio

nal

Com

plex

Har

dem

an

Coun

ty

Corre

ctio

nal

Faci

lity

Mor

gan

Coun

ty

Corre

ctio

nal

Com

plex

Mar

k H

. Lu

ttrel

l Ce

nter

Nor

thea

st Co

rrect

iona

l Co

mpl

ex

Nor

thw

est

Corre

ctio

nal

Com

plex

Rive

rben

d M

axim

um

Secu

rity

Insti

tutio

n

Sout

h Ce

ntra

l Co

rrect

iona

l Fa

cilit

y

DeB

erry

Sp

ecia

l N

eeds

Fa

cilit

y

Sout

heas

tern

TN

St

ate

Turn

ey

Cent

er

Indu

stria

l Co

mpl

ex

TN P

rison

for

Wom

en

Whi

tevi

lle

Corre

ctio

nal

Faci

lity

Wes

t TN

Sta

te

Peni

tent

iary

Ave

rage

Pop

ulat

ion

968

1963

2149

413

1782

2315

695

1618

694

917

1514

752

1486

2443

1970

8D

rugs

DRJ

CON

FIS-

SIG

NIF

AM

T-O

FN3

525

223

106

03

310

51

2812

4D

rugs

DRK

CON

FIS-

SIG

NIF

AM

T-ST

AFF

00

00

00

00

00

01

00

1D

rugs

DRL

CON

FIS-

SIG

NIF

AM

T-V

ISIT

OR

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0D

rugs

DRQ

CON

FISC

ATI

ON

-OFF

END

ER9

8256

1673

9010

2118

2168

2527

5857

4D

rugs

DRN

CON

FISC

ATI

ON

-STA

FF0

01

00

00

00

00

00

01

Dru

gsD

ROCO

NFI

SCA

TIO

N-V

ISIT

OR

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0D

rugs

DRP

POSS

ESSI

ON

03

221

3318

02

46

180

27

116

Dru

gsD

RSSE

LLIN

G0

91

00

32

01

02

42

024

Equi

p Pr

obEP

AM

AJO

R D

ISRU

PTIO

N4

03

20

21

05

04

10

123

Equi

p Pr

obEP

BM

INO

R D

ISR

UPT

ION

0Es

cape

*ES

ASE

CURE

SU

PERV

ISIO

N0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Esca

pe*

ESB

MIN

SEC

URI

TY-V

IOLE

NCE

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0Es

cape

ESC

MIN

SEC

URI

TY U

NIT

00

10

00

01

00

20

00

4Es

cape

ESP

MIN

SEC

WO

RK C

REW

-SU

PV2

01

00

00

00

00

00

03

Esca

peES

UM

IN S

EC W

ORK

CRE

W U

NSU

PV0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Esca

peES

EFU

RLO

UG

H/P

ASS

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0Es

cape

ESF

ATT

. SEC

URE

SU

PV0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Esca

pe*

ESH

ATT

.MIN

SEC

URI

TY-V

IOLE

NCE

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0Es

cape

ESI

ATT

. MIN

SEC

URI

TY0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Esca

peES

RRE

TURN

FRO

M E

SCA

PE P

RIO

R TO

TO

MIS

20

00

00

00

00

00

00

2Fi

reFI

ISE

R-IN

J-PR

OP

DM

G>$

500-

OPR

DIS

RUP

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0Fi

reFI

PIN

J-PR

OP

DM

G>$

500-

OPR

DIS

RUP

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0Fi

reFI

SPR

OP

DM

G>$

500-

OPE

R D

ISRU

P0

00

00

00

00

01

00

12

Inju

ryIH

AA

CCID

ENT-

OFN

-SER

IOU

S7

24

12

01

51

44

10

133

Inju

ryIH

CA

CCID

ENT-

OFN

151

8034

41

315

410

625

60

630

0In

jury

IHB

ACC

IDEN

T-O

FN W

RK R

ELA

TED

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0In

jury

IJA

ACC

IDEN

T-ST

AFF

-SER

IOU

S2

01

03

10

00

10

00

08

Inju

ryIJ

BA

CCID

ENT-

STA

FF28

049

3353

2926

3430

3211

411

1635

6In

jury

ILA

ACC

IDEN

T-V

ISIT

OR-

SERI

OU

S0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Inju

ryIL

BA

CCID

ENT-

VIS

ITO

R4

29

62

41

12

13

80

144

Inju

ry*

INB

SELF

INFL

ICTE

D-S

ERIO

US

20

23

03

50

140

42

32

40In

jury

*IN

CSE

LF IN

FLIC

TED

226

4024

430

2235

981

1426

4639

407

Illne

ssIO

TO

FN-S

ERIO

US-

HO

SP21

147

1716

535

131

1414

3048

205

485

Illne

ssIS

HST

AFF

-SER

IOU

S-H

OSP

(ON

DU

TY)

100

135

47

12

143

45

020

88Ill

ness

IVS

VIS

ITO

R-SE

RIO

US-

HO

SP0

00

00

00

01

00

00

12

Illne

ssIV

MV

ISIT

OR

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0O

ther

BTH

BOM

B TH

REA

T0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Oth

erCO

NCO

NTR

ABA

ND

6415

118

567

119

295

184

502

158

101

338

5517

020

825

97O

ther

PCT

POSS

/USE

CEL

LULA

R TE

L.40

176

186

020

120

138

4027

6523

00

3425

914

97

TD

OC

INC

IDE

NT

SU

MM

AR

Y:

FY

2009

-201

0


CB

CX

HC

CF

MC

CX

ML

RC

NE

CX

NW

CX

RM

SISC

CF

SPN

DST

SRT

CIX

TP

FW

WC

FA

WT

SPSY

STE

M

Cha

rles

Bas

s C

orre

ctio

nal

Com

plex

Har

dem

an

Cou

nty

Cor

rect

iona

l Fa

cilit

y

Mor

gan

Cou

nty

Cor

rect

iona

l C

ompl

ex

Mar

k H

. Lu

ttrel

l C

ente

r

Nor

thea

st

Cor

rect

iona

l C

ompl

ex

Nor

thw

est

Cor

rect

iona

l C

ompl

ex

Riv

erbe

nd

Max

imum

Se

curit

y In

stitu

tion

Sout

h C

entra

l C

orre

ctio

nal

Faci

lity

DeB

erry

Sp

ecia

l N

eeds

Fa

cilit

y

Sout

heas

tern

TN

St

ate

Turn

ey

Cen

ter

Indu

stria

l C

ompl

ex

TN P

rison

for

Wom

en

Whi

tevi

lle

Cor

rect

iona

l Fa

cilit

y

Wes

t TN

Sta

te

Peni

tent

iary

Ave

rage

Pop

ulat

ion

968

1963

2149

413

1782

2315

695

1618

694

917

1514

752

1486

2443

1970

8O

ther

PTO

POSS

/USE

TO

BA

CC

O P

RO

D.

5997

153

4817

115

141

2777

136

139

4727

9412

67O

ther

PDA

PRO

P D

MG

>$50

07

010

20

73

14

57

00

1157

Oth

erSX

MSE

XU

AL

MIS

CO

ND

UC

T6

2450

1263

198

8114

317

3041

139

106

793

Oth

er*

RA

PR

APE

01

00

00

00

00

10

00

2O

ther

*R

IOR

IOT

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0O

ther

SBT

SAB

OTA

GE

- O

PR D

ISR

UP

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0O

ther

*H

OS

HO

STA

GE

SITU

ATI

ON

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0O

ther

EHT

EPID

EMIC

PU

BLI

C H

EA

LTH

TH

RE

AT

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0O

ther

PGA

PAR

T IN

STG

AC

TIV

ITY

134

61

236

335

12

310

2625

203

Oth

erPG

MPO

SSE

SS S

TG M

ATE

RIA

L5

5155

23

438

932

1254

193

2044

2O

ther

ILP

INST

LO

CK

DO

WN

-PA

RTI

AL

21

13

04

324

00

21

118

60O

ther

ILT

INST

LO

CK

DO

WN

-TO

TAL

14

00

03

51

10

10

44

24St

rike

SKI

INM

ATE

-OPE

R.D

ISR

UP

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0St

rike

SKS

STA

FF-O

PER

DIS

RU

P0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Suic

ide

*SU

AA

TT-S

ER

IOU

S IN

JUR

Y0

10

00

10

21

00

20

07

Suic

ide

*SU

CA

TTE

MPT

02

210

02

25

50

32

20

44U

se o

f For

ceU

FCC

HE

MIC

AL

AG

EN

TS2

157

09

392

194

11

050

1416

3U

se o

f For

ceU

FDD

EAD

LY W

EAPO

N0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Use

of F

orce

UFE

ELE

C R

EST

RA

INTS

10

50

13

110

81

11

09

41U

se o

f For

ceU

FLLE

SS T

HA

N L

ETH

AL

00

00

00

00

00

01

00

1U

se o

f For

ceU

FMM

ED

ICA

L0

01

01

614

068

05

200

011

5U

se o

f For

ceU

FPPH

YSI

CA

L3

4328

79

2728

3244

527

1927

9639

5W

eapo

nW

AB

AM

MU

NIT

ION

20

10

00

01

00

00

00

4W

eapo

nW

AM

AM

MU

NIT

ION

-SIG

NIF

AM

T0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Wea

pon

WC

FC

OM

MER

CIA

L FI

RE

AR

M0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Wea

pon

WC

KC

OM

MER

CIA

L K

NIF

E4

10

05

01

00

17

00

019

Wea

pon

WE

BEX

PLO

SIV

E0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Wea

pon

WE

XEX

PLO

SIV

E-S

IGN

IF A

MT

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0W

eapo

nW

HF

HO

ME

MA

DE

FIR

EA

RM

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0W

eapo

nW

HK

HO

ME

MA

DE

KN

IFE

283

270

3717

613

869

751

177

8265

1W

eapo

nW

OT

OTH

ER

12

173

1114

68

71

102

07

89W

eapo

nW

PCC

LUB

00

00

01

01

00

10

03

6W

eapo

nW

RM

RA

W M

ATE

RIA

LS0

07

01

257

70

15

33

1877

Wea

pon

WTA

CLA

SS A

TO

OL

00

21

00

10

00

10

00

5W

eapo

nW

TBC

LASS

B T

OO

L0

20

00

00

00

00

00

02

Sum

mar

y C

BC

XH

CC

FM

CC

XM

LR

CN

EC

XN

WC

XR

MSI

SCC

FSP

ND

STSR

TC

IXT

PFW

WC

FAW

TSP

Tot

al

TO

TA

L-V

IOL

EN

T23

9318

057

5715

712

611

127

421

8465

144

205

1,59

7*T

OT

AL

- N

ON

-VIO

LE

NT

341

1,20

21,

460

276

994

1,79

158

51,

412

638

598

1,34

635

283

21,

566

13,3

93T

OT

AL

364

1,29

51,

640

333

1,05

11,

948

711

1,52

391

261

91,

430

417

976

1,77

114

,990

Rat

e pe

r 10

0 - V

iole

nt2.

384.

748.

3813

.81

3.20

6.78

18.1

26.

8639

.50

2.29

5.55

8.64

9.69

8.39

8.10

Rat

e pe

r 10

0 - N

on-V

iole

nt35

.24

61.2

367

.95

66.8

755

.78

77.3

884

.13

87.2

691

.96

65.1

988

.93

46.7

956

.00

64.1

167

.96

Rat

e pe

r 10

0 - T

otal

37.6

265

.97

76.3

380

.68

58.9

884

.16

102.

2594

.12

131.

4667

.48

94.4

855

.43

65.6

972

.50

76.0

6

TD

OC

INC

IDE

NT

SU

MM

AR

Y:

FY

2009

-201

0

WWW.TN.GOV/CORRECTION

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION RACHEL JACKSON BUILDING

320 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH NASHVILLE, TN 37243

615-741-1000

2010 statistical abstract working - tennessee · this section also implements and monitors...

Documents