2010 voc workshop session 1d: fugitive emissions definitions, measurement and verification david...
DESCRIPTION
2010 VOC WORKSHOP: SESSION 1D17-18/06/2010 Solvent based printing: flexography, rotogravure, laminating, varnishing (> 200 ton/year) I = 100% O4 = 10% O5 = 90 % BREF BATAEL: 7,5 - 12,5 % In IPPC permits: 10% of reference emission Solvent based printing => incinerator Floor extraction + cleaning machines => incinerator Solvent based flexography, rotogravure, laminating, varnishingTRANSCRIPT
2010 VOC WorkshopSession 1D: Fugitive emissions – definitions, measurement and verification
David Knight
Belgium - Flemish Government Environment, Nature and Energy departmentAir, Nuisance, Risk Management, Environment and Health DivisionKoning Albert II-laan 20, bus 8, 1000 BrusselTel. 02 553 11 34 – Fax. 02 553 11 [email protected]
2010 VOC WORKSHOP: SESSION 1D 17-18/06/2010
Mass balance of solvent based printing Mass balance of solvent based printing with incinerationwith incineration
I = Input Solvent consuming Installation
OUTPUTO1 = waste gases (stack)O2 = solvents in waste waterO3 = residual solvent in productO4 = fugitive emissionsO5 = destroyed/capturedO6 = solvent in wasteO7 = solvent in products (e.g. paints)O8 = recovered solvents for reuseO9 = other
Simplified exampleSolvent based printing: O4 = fugitive emissionsO5 = destroyed/captured O1, O2, O3, O6, O7, O8 = marginal
Fugitive emission = O4 = I – O5
ELV and BATAELELV: 100 mg C / Nm3 20% of solvent input Reduction scheme: 25% * (4*solids) BREF: 7,5 – 12,5 % * (4*solids)
2010 VOC WORKSHOP: SESSION 1D 17-18/06/2010
Solvent based printing:Solvent based printing:flexography, rotogravure, laminating, flexography, rotogravure, laminating, varnishing (> 200 ton/year)varnishing (> 200 ton/year)
I = 100% O4 = 10%
O5 = 90 %
BREF BATAEL: 7,5 - 12,5 % In IPPC permits: 10% of reference emission Solvent based printing => incineratorFloor extraction + cleaning machines => incinerator
Solvent based flexography, rotogravure, laminating, varnishing
2010 VOC WORKSHOP: SESSION 1D 17-18/06/2010
2010 VOC WORKSHOP: SESSION 1D 17-18/06/2010
[O4 = I – O5] in practice
Unit Value Deviation
Min. Max.
Flowrate m3/h 50.000
Concentration g/m3 5
Operation Hours 3400
O5 Ton/year 850 10% 765 935
Input Ton/year 1000
O4 Ton/year 150 235 65
O4 % of solvent input
15 23,5 6,5
POSSIBLE SOLUTION = MEASURE O4 INSTEAD OF O5
2010 VOC WORKSHOP: SESSION 1D 17-18/06/2010
[O4 = I – O5] in practice
Possibility 1Printing room with negative pressure due to extraction, all extraction to incinerator
Possibility 3Printing room under pressure / no pressure
NO PROBLEMCan be tested with e.g. smoke
PROBLEMATICEmissions through doors, windows
Possibility 2Printing room with negative pressure due to extraction, not all extraction to incinerotor
Emission through ventitlation shaftsCan be tested with e.g. smokeVentilation shafts can be measured
2010 VOC WORKSHOP: SESSION 1D 17-18/06/2010
Possibility 3: several methods tested Possibility 3: several methods tested during 1 production day (VITO during 1 production day (VITO
Method 1: input + passive sampling Method 2: input + portable FIDMethod 3: FID for O5 and passive sampling for O4Method 4: FID for O5 and portable FID for O4 Method 5: portable FID for O4 and O5Method 6: theoretical estimation based on specifics of printing machines and used solvents
2010 VOC WORKSHOP: SESSION 1D 17-18/06/2010
Method 1: Method 1: solvent input + passive sampling solvent input + passive sampling
I O4 Solvent based flexography, rotogravure, laminating, varnishing
O5
Solvent input measured O4 measured with passive sampling O4 = 11% of solvent input
2010 VOC WORKSHOP: SESSION 1D 17-18/06/2010
Method 1: Method 1: solvent input + passive sampling solvent input + passive sampling
2010 VOC WORKSHOP: SESSION 1D 17-18/06/2010
Method 5: Method 5: Portable FID Portable FID
Input O4 Solvent based flexography, rotogravure, laminating, varnishing
O5
O4 and O5 with portable FID 2 measurements for each source O4 + O5 = 100% O4 = 14,9 %
2010 VOC WORKSHOP: SESSION 1D 17-18/06/2010
Method 6: Method 6: Theoretical estimation Theoretical estimation
Theoretical percentages based on the following assumptions: Completely covered ink fountain = 0% Adequate coverage of ink fountains = 2,5% Chamber doctor blades = 2,5% Open ink fountain = 5% Disfunctioning of incinerator = 0,29% Cleaning machine not connected = 5% Residual solvent in products = 2,5% ect.
Estimation of solvent use for every machine
Combination of this information leads to emission estimate of 9,6 %
2010 VOC WORKSHOP: SESSION 1D 17-18/06/2010
Method 2: Method 2: solvent input + FID solvent input + FID
I O4 Solvent based flexography, rotogravure, laminating, varnishing
O5
solvent input measured O4 measured with portable FID
2010 VOC WORKSHOP: SESSION 1D 17-18/06/2010
Method 3: Method 3: Passive sampling + FID Passive sampling + FID
I O4 Solvent based flexography, rotogravure, laminating, varnishing
O5
O4 with passive sampling O5 with FID continuous measurement Solvent input = O4 + O5
2010 VOC WORKSHOP: SESSION 1D 17-18/06/2010
Method 4: Method 4: FID + portable FID FID + portable FID
I O4 Solvent based flexography, rotogravure, laminating, varnishing
O5
O4 with portable FID: 4 measurements O5 with FID: continuous measurement Solvent input = O4 + O5
2010 VOC WORKSHOP: SESSION 1D 17-18/06/2010
Method % 95% confidence
%
Cost
1 input + passive 13 26 ++++2 input + port FID 31 10 Not representative for
entire period+++
3 passive + FID 9 260 Not useful ++++
4 FID + port FID 20 107 Not useful +++
5 port FID 15 - ++6 theoretical 10 - +
2010 VOC WORKSHOP: SESSION 1D 17-18/06/2010
Conclusions solvent based printing Conclusions solvent based printing
O4 = I – O5 does not always work in practice
Measuring O4 is in some cases a robust and feasible solution
Measuring O4 can however be expensive and labour intensive
For extrapolation from 1 day measurement to an entire year stable ventilation and printing specifics are needed
Measuring does not reduce emissions
Alternative approach: estimation based on reduction measures applied?
2010 VOC WORKSHOP: SESSION 1D 17-18/06/2010
Mass balance of paint/ink production Mass balance of paint/ink production with incinerationwith incineration
I = Input Solvent consuming installation
OUTPUTO1 = waste gases (stack)O2 = solvents in waste waterO3 = residual solvent in productO4 = fugitive emissionsO5 = destroyed/capturedO6 = solvent in wasteO7 = solvent in products (e.g. paints)O8 = recovered solvents for reuseO9 = other
Simplified examplePaint/ink production : 01 = waste gasesO4 = fugitive emissionsO5 = destroyed/capturedO7 = solvent in product O2, O3, O6, O8, O9 = marginal
Emission = O1 + O4 = I – O5 – O7
ELV 150 mg C / Nm3 AND 3% of solvent input 3% of solvent input
2010 VOC WORKSHOP: SESSION 1D 17-18/06/2010
O1 + O4 = I – O5 – O7
Unit Value Deviation
Min. Max.
I = INPUT Ton/year 10.000 1% 10.100 9.900
O7 = PRODUCT Ton/year 9.700 1% 9.603 9.797
O5 = INCINERATOR Ton/year 100 10% 90 110
O1 + O4 Ton/year 200 >100% 407 23
O1 + O4 % of input 4% 0%
POSSIBLE SOLUTION = MEASURE O4 INSTEAD OF O1 AND O7
2010 VOC WORKSHOP: SESSION 1D 17-18/06/2010
Paint and ink production: estimation of Paint and ink production: estimation of emissions at 3 plants in Belgium emissions at 3 plants in Belgium
Plant 1 O1 + O4 = I – O5 – O7
Plant 2 Uses results of monitoring of working environment Twice a year employees wear passive sampling badges For every production area, the ventilation frequency is known (e.g. air is refreshed 6 times per hour) Concentration and ventilation combined give an estimate of mass flux for every area
Plant 3 All emissions are lead through ventilation shafts All emissions are measured at least once a year Continuous paint production Difference between mass balance and measurement = 85%