2010pa507week9

Upload: aguste-comte

Post on 16-Oct-2015

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 5/26/2018 2010PA507Week9

    1/24

    W E E K 9 : P O L I C Y T Y P E S

    The Public Policy Process

  • 5/26/2018 2010PA507Week9

    2/24

    Some reminders

    I will get your agenda memos back ASAP

    Then I will start reading rewrites

    Keep doing and sending rewrites!

    Visit me if you need todont just wait for officehours!

    The due dates on many assignments have changed;the revised syllabus has been posted.

    Dont forget to review the notes on the midtermexam, posted on the course website.

  • 5/26/2018 2010PA507Week9

    3/24

    What weve done so far

    Introduced the idea of the policy process

    Described the goals of public policy

    Outlined problems

    Learned about long-term and changeable features ofthe policy environment

    Considered the roles of official and unofficial actors

    Discussed groups, power, and the agenda settingprocess

  • 5/26/2018 2010PA507Week9

    4/24

    Whats next:

    Today: Policy Types (more interesting than Ithought!)

    Next Week: Policy Tools

    April 6: Policy Implementation, Failure, andLearning

    April 13: The Science of Public Policy

    April 20: Class Cancelled

    April 27: Review, Summary, Ideas about the Final(Final will be posted before class)

  • 5/26/2018 2010PA507Week9

    5/24

    What Is a Policy?

    Public policy:What the government, acting on ourbehalf, chooses to do or not to do.

    A policyis a statement by government of what it

    intends to do or not to do, such as a law, regulation,ruling, decision, or order, or a combination of these.

  • 5/26/2018 2010PA507Week9

    6/24

    What are some examples of these levels of policy?

    Constitutional

    Statutory

    Regulatory

    SOPs Street-level bureaucrats

    Subtle changes in cognition

  • 5/26/2018 2010PA507Week9

    7/24

    Codifying and Publicizing Policies

    Level of Policy Where Codified Visibility of CodificationConstitutional In the federal or state

    constitutions Highly visible at the federal level: theConstitution has been edited very fewtimes. Some state constitutions are

    more easily amended for minor

    changes.Statutory United States Code, Statutes at

    Large, StateHighly visible through codification instatute law, publication in Statutes at

    Large.Regulatory Federal Register, Code of Federal

    Regulations Moderately visible through the Code ofFederal Regulations and the FederalRegister.

    Formal record of standard

    operating procedures

    Operating Procedures Manuals Low visibility because S.O.P.s are oftenonly internally published.

    Patterned behavior by

    street level bureaucrats Not formally codified; evidenceof a policy may be found insome agency records

    Low visibility because these are

    behavioral changes with variations

    among actorsSubtle changes in

    cognition, in emphasis on

    problems, etc.Not formally codified. Often

    revealed by the behavior of

    street level bureaucrats

    themselves.

    Very low visibility. Not codified, and

    changes in perceptions and emphases

    may be subtle.

  • 5/26/2018 2010PA507Week9

    8/24

    Why does the level of policy matter?

    Visibility

    Respect

    Compliance

  • 5/26/2018 2010PA507Week9

    9/24

    Policy Types

    A way of predicting policy outcomes

    How? By categorizing the type of policy

    Weak typology: substantive policy type

    Education Environment

    Health

  • 5/26/2018 2010PA507Week9

    10/24

    A Good Policy Typology is

    Generalizable

    Mutually exclusive

    Collectively exhaustive

    Explanation and prediction: Knowing what kind of policy we are dealing with would allow

    the policy designer to predict the sorts of policy conflict thatwould precede the policys enactment, and what sort of conflict

    might arise after the policy is adopted and implemented.

  • 5/26/2018 2010PA507Week9

    11/24

    Theodore Lowis Classic Typology

    Lowi: Distributive, Regulatory, and RedistributivePolicy

    Ripley and Franklin:

    Protective Regulatory Competitive Regulatory

  • 5/26/2018 2010PA507Week9

    12/24

    What is distributive policy

    Policies with many beneficiaries

    Policies where those who pay are diffuse

    Logrolling

    Examples Farm subsidies

    Local infrastructure

    Pork

  • 5/26/2018 2010PA507Week9

    13/24

    What are the problems of distributive policy?

    Clienteleism

    Interest group liberalism

    The failure to make tough decisions about what are

    broader national needs.

  • 5/26/2018 2010PA507Week9

    14/24

    Competitive regulatory

    Limit the provision of goods and services to one or afew designated deliverers, who are chosen from alarger number of competing potential deliverers.

    Conflict is limited, low key Examples: Allocation of radio and TV frequencies

    Utility franchises

    Regulation of doctors, lawyers, other professions

  • 5/26/2018 2010PA507Week9

    15/24

    Protective regulatory

    Protect people from negative effects of business

    Not always opposed by business!

    But is still more contentious than competitive

    regulatory Examples Environmental regulation

    Health care reform!

    Any safety regulation, like auto safety

  • 5/26/2018 2010PA507Week9

    16/24

    Redistributive policies

    Taking from one group, and giving to another Intended to manipulate the allocation of wealth, property,

    personal or civil rights, or some other valued item among socialclasses or racial groups.

    Not just from the rich to the poor!

    Extremely contentious

    Winners and losers

    Zero sum games

    Some people treat values as limited resources. Examples?

  • 5/26/2018 2010PA507Week9

    17/24

    Actors, Stability, and Visibility of Policy Types

    Policy type Primary actors Relationshipamong actors Stability ofrelationship Visibility of decision

    Distributive Congressionalsubcommittees and

    committees; executive

    bureaus; small interest

    groups

    Logrolling

    (everyone gains) Stable Low

    Protective regulatory

    Congressionalsubcommittees and

    committees; full House and

    Senate; executive agencies;

    trade associations

    Bargaining;compromise Unstable Moderate

    Competitive

    regulatory Subcommittees; executivebureaus and commissions;small interest groups

    Logrolling among

    favored actors Stable Very low; very littlefull congressionalinvolvement

    Redistributive President and hisappointees; committees

    and/or Congress; largest

    interest groups (peak

    associations);

    liberals/conservatives

    Ideological andclass conflict Stable High

  • 5/26/2018 2010PA507Week9

    18/24

    Influence of Key Actors

    Policy Type President,presidency, and

    centralized

    bureaucracyBureaus Congress as

    whole Congressionalsubcommittees Private sector

    Distributive Low High Low (supportssubcommittees) High High(subsidized

    groups)ProtectiveRegulatory Moderatelyhigh Moderate Moderately high Moderate Moderatelyhigh (regulated

    interests)Competitive

    regulatory Low High(Regulatoryagencies)

    Low Moderate tolow High (regulatedinterests)

    Redistributive High Low High Moderately low High (peakassociations

    representing

    clusters of

    interest groups)

  • 5/26/2018 2010PA507Week9

    19/24

    Shortcomings of Lowis typology

    Categories are not mutually exclusive

    Assignment to categories is difficult

    Forcing into boxes

    Si lifi i C d d Diff C

  • 5/26/2018 2010PA507Week9

    20/24

    Simplification: Concentrated and Diffuse Costsand Benefits

    Benefits

    Concentrated among very

    few people

    Distributed among many people

    Costs

    Concentrated

    among veryfew people

    Interest group politics: conflict

    between groups that would

    benefit and those that wouldbear the costs. Treated as a

    zero-sum game.

    Entrepreneurial politics: groups

    and their leaders seek to

    persuade policy makers toregulate in the public interest, in

    the face of opposition from the

    groups that would bear the cost.

    Distributed

    among many

    people

    Clientele oriented politics:

    close clientele relationships

    between policy makers,regulators, and the regulated

    interest.

    Majoritarian politics: Relatively

    loose groups of people, or those

    acting on their behalf, who seeka substantive or symbolic

    statement of policy. Often leads

    to weak, ambiguous policies.

  • 5/26/2018 2010PA507Week9

    21/24

    How does this relate to Lowis typology?

  • 5/26/2018 2010PA507Week9

    22/24

    How is this different from Lowis typology?

    Focus is on costs and benefits only, not on the intentof policy

    The two dimensions are continual, not dichotomous

  • 5/26/2018 2010PA507Week9

    23/24

    What does this mean to you?

    How you frame a policy is really important. You can show that Everyone will benefit, but few will pay

    Everyone will benefit, but everyone pays a lot

    Those who pay deserve to pay If interest group liberalism is really true, what is your

    goal as a group? Keep conflict quiet

    Venue shopping

    You should choose what sort of broad policy tool youwould use to achieve your goals. Why: Avoid conflict. Conflict raises issues on agendas.

  • 5/26/2018 2010PA507Week9

    24/24

    Other Policy Typologies

    Substantive and Procedural Policies

    Material and Symbolic Policies

    Public versus Private Goods

    Liberal and Conservative Policies Think about how people make arguments about

    these policy types