2011-12 y5 feedback example school - centre for evaluation ... may 2012/primary/primary... ·...

19
Example School Y5 Feedback 2011-12 About your feedback The intention of the InCAS Project is to provide high quality, confidential information for use by professionals within schools to promote improvement. Information is fed back regarding the self- concept (attitude) and achievement of individual pupils. Two types of achievement measure are provided. These are the levels of attainment reached and the relative progress (value-added) made in each curriculum area. InCAS (Interactive Computerised Assessment System) is a computerised adaptive assessment program that is designed for children aged 5 – 11 years which can also be used with children in the first year of secondary school who have special educational needs. It includes assessments of reading and spelling, mathematics, mental arithmetic, picture vocabulary, non-verbal ability and attitudes. InCAS is used in several countries and some of the information in this booklet is relevant to some countries but not others. The results give a profile for the whole school, individual classes and individual pupils. Pupil reports allow the teacher to see reading, spelling and mathematics abilities in relation to vocabulary, non-verbal ability and attitudes. The analysis of reading and spelling scores will enable a teacher to see which pupils have good word recognition and decoding skills but perhaps poor understanding of a passage of text. Other children will be able to read reasonably well but have problems with spelling, and so on. The added dimension of picture vocabulary and non-verbal ability enables teachers to see if pupils’ reading is in line with these. This is particularly useful for children for whom English is an additional language. The pupils’ responses for vocabulary, non-verbal ability, reading, spelling, mental arithmetic and general mathematics are converted to age equivalent scores that can be compared to their actual age. Age standardised scores are available if preferred. Attitudes are reported on a scale of negative through to positive. Predictions of English National Curriculum Levels are also available where applicable. InCAS Y5 feedback 2011 – 2012 2

Upload: ngodung

Post on 02-Nov-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 2011-12 Y5 Feedback Example School - Centre for Evaluation ... May 2012/Primary/Primary... · Example School Y5 Feedback ... Charlie Clementine 9:10 11:8 11:8 Deadrie Damson 10:0

Exa

mp

le S

cho

ol

Y5

Fee

db

ack

20

11

-12

Ab

ou

t yo

ur fe

ed

ba

ck

Th

e in

ten

tion

of th

e In

CA

S P

roje

ct is to p

rovid

e h

igh

qu

ality, co

nfid

en

tial in

form

atio

n fo

r use

by

pro

fessio

na

lsw

ithin

scho

ols

top

rom

ote

imp

rove

me

nt.

Info

rma

tion

isfe

db

ack

rega

rdin

gth

ese

lf-

con

cep

t(a

ttitud

e)

an

da

chie

vem

en

to

fin

div

idu

alp

up

ils.T

wo

typ

es

of

ach

ieve

me

nt

me

asu

rea

re

pro

vid

ed

.T

he

sea

reth

ele

vels

of

atta

inm

en

tre

ach

ed

an

dth

ere

lative

pro

gre

ss(va

lue

-ad

de

d)

ma

de

in

ea

chcu

rriculu

ma

rea

.

InC

AS

(Inte

ractive

Co

mp

ute

rised

Asse

ssme

nt

Syste

m)

isa

com

pu

terise

da

da

ptive

asse

ssme

nt

pro

gra

m

tha

tis

de

sign

ed

for

child

ren

ag

ed

5–

11

yea

rsw

hich

can

also

be

use

dw

ithch

ildre

nin

the

firstye

ar

of

seco

nd

ary

scho

ol

wh

oh

ave

spe

cial

ed

uca

tion

al

ne

ed

s.It

inclu

de

sa

ssessm

en

tso

fre

ad

ing

an

dsp

ellin

g,

ma

the

ma

tics,m

en

tal

arith

me

tic,p

icture

voca

bu

lary,

no

n-ve

rba

la

bility

an

da

ttitud

es.

InC

AS

isu

sed

in

seve

ral

cou

ntrie

sa

nd

som

eo

fth

ein

form

atio

nin

this

bo

okle

tis

rele

van

tto

som

eco

un

tries

bu

tn

ot

oth

ers.

Th

ere

sults

give

ap

rofile

for

the

wh

ole

scho

ol,

ind

ivid

ua

lcla

sses

an

din

div

idu

al

pu

pils.

Pu

pil

rep

orts

allo

wth

ete

ach

er

tose

ere

ad

ing

,sp

ellin

ga

nd

ma

the

ma

ticsa

bilitie

sin

rela

tion

tovo

cab

ula

ry,n

on

-verb

al

ab

ilitya

nd

attitu

de

s.T

he

an

alysis

of

rea

din

ga

nd

spe

lling

score

sw

ille

na

ble

ate

ach

er

tose

ew

hich

pu

pils

ha

veg

oo

dw

ord

reco

gn

ition

an

dd

eco

din

gsk

illsb

ut

pe

rha

ps

po

or

un

de

rstan

din

go

fa

pa

ssag

eo

f

text.

Oth

er

child

ren

will

be

ab

leto

rea

dre

aso

na

bly

we

llb

ut

ha

vep

rob

lem

sw

ithsp

ellin

g,

an

dso

on

.T

he

ad

de

dd

ime

nsio

no

fp

icture

voca

bu

lary

an

dn

on

-verb

al

ab

ilitye

na

ble

ste

ach

ers

tose

eif

pu

pils’

rea

din

g

isin

line

with

the

se.

Th

isis

pa

rticula

rlyu

sefu

lfo

rch

ildre

nfo

rw

ho

mE

ng

lishis

an

ad

ditio

na

lla

ng

ua

ge

.

Th

ep

up

ils’re

spo

nse

sfo

rvo

cab

ula

ry,n

on

-verb

al

ab

ility,re

ad

ing

,sp

ellin

g,

me

nta

la

rithm

etic

an

dge

ne

ral

ma

the

ma

ticsa

reco

nve

rted

toa

ge

eq

uiva

len

tsco

res

tha

tca

nb

eco

mp

are

dto

the

ira

ctua

la

ge

.A

ge

stan

da

rdise

dsco

res

are

ava

ilab

leif

pre

ferre

d.

Attitu

de

sa

rere

po

rted

on

asca

leo

fn

ega

tiveth

rou

gh

to

po

sitive.

Pre

dictio

ns

of

En

glish

Na

tion

alC

urricu

lum

Leve

lsa

rea

lsoa

vaila

ble

wh

ere

ap

plica

ble

.

InC

AS

Y5

fee

db

ack

20

11

–2

01

2

2

Page 2: 2011-12 Y5 Feedback Example School - Centre for Evaluation ... May 2012/Primary/Primary... · Example School Y5 Feedback ... Charlie Clementine 9:10 11:8 11:8 Deadrie Damson 10:0

Pu

pil S

core

s

Sy

mb

ols

use

din

the

fee

db

ack

tab

les

*P

up

ilh

as

no

tco

mp

lete

da

pa

rticula

rm

od

ule

or

un

it

#T

he

con

fide

nce

inte

rval

of

am

od

ule

exce

ed

sp

lus

or

min

us

thre

e

yea

rs

Th

e sta

nd

ard

fee

db

ack

for In

CA

S p

rese

nts sco

res a

s ‘ag

e e

qu

ivale

nt sco

res’, w

hich

me

an

s tha

t

the

y a

re th

e a

ge

, in ye

ars a

nd

mo

nth

s, at w

hich

a p

up

il is pe

rform

ing

. If a p

up

il is pe

rform

ing

as

exp

ecte

d fo

r his/h

er a

ge

, the

ag

e e

qu

ivale

nt sco

re is th

e sa

me

as h

is/he

r chro

no

log

ical a

ge

.

If a p

up

il ha

s no

t com

ple

ted

a p

articu

lar m

od

ule

or u

nit, th

ere

will b

e a

n a

sterisk

.

So

me

pu

pils’ a

ge

eq

uiva

len

t score

s fall b

elo

w th

e m

inim

um

or a

bo

ve th

e m

axim

um

. In th

ese

insta

nce

s, the

diffe

ren

ce b

etw

ee

n th

e ch

ron

olo

gica

l ag

e a

nd

ag

e e

qu

ivale

nt sco

re is d

en

ote

d b

y

<-

(less th

an

) if the

ag

e e

qu

ivale

nt sco

re is b

elo

w th

e m

inim

um

or

>(g

rea

ter th

an

) if ab

ove

the

ma

ximu

m. D

iffere

nce

s tab

les a

re n

ot p

rod

uce

d fo

r attitu

de

s.

Th

e a

ge

ran

ge

rep

orte

d fo

r Re

ad

ing

is > 4

yea

rs an

d <

16

yea

rs, for M

ath

s this ra

ng

e is >

3 ye

ars

an

d <

16

yea

rs.

Afte

r the

stan

da

rd fe

ed

ba

ck ta

ble

s Th

e fig

ure

s in th

ese

tab

les sh

ow

the

diffe

ren

ces b

etw

ee

n

chro

no

log

ical a

ge

an

d a

ge

eq

uiva

len

t score

for e

ach

pu

pil in

the

class o

r yea

r gro

up

.

InC

AS

Y5

fee

db

ack

20

11

–2

01

2

3

Pu

pil S

core

s: Atta

inm

en

t (Re

ad

ing

an

d G

en

era

l Ma

ths)

4

Th

e R

ea

din

g sco

re is a

com

po

site sco

re ca

lcula

ted

from

the

Wo

rd R

eco

gn

ition

, Wo

rd D

eco

din

g a

nd

Co

mp

reh

en

sion

mo

du

les. T

he

Ge

ne

ral M

ath

em

atics sco

re is th

e o

vera

ll score

from

the

Ge

ne

ral

Ma

the

ma

tics un

it wh

ich in

clud

e N

um

be

r 1, N

um

be

r 2, M

ea

sure

Sh

ap

e a

nd

Sp

ace

an

d D

ata

.

Age

Nam

e(Yrs:M

ths)

ReadingGenMaths

Ad

am

Ap

ple

9:7

9:1

010:2

Be

rtie B

an

an

a9

:712:2

10:1

0

Ch

arlie

Cle

me

ntin

e9

:10

11:8

11:8

De

ad

rie D

am

son

10

:07:7

9:1

Eliza

be

th E

lde

rbe

rry9

:10

11:1

10:2

Fio

na

Fig

9:3

8:7

10:0

Ge

org

ia G

rap

e9

:911:8

10:1

Ha

rrold

Hu

ckle

be

rry9

:910:2

10:5

Jam

es Jo

job

a9

:012:1

11:0

Ke

vin

Kiw

i9

:10

10:9

11:5

Lau

ra Le

mo

n9

:18:7

8:1

0

Ma

rk M

an

go

9:5

9:9

9:7

Na

talie

Ne

ctarin

e9

:410:7

10:2

Oliv

ia O

live

9:1

12:0

10:9

Pa

ul P

ine

ap

ple

9:9

10:8

11:1

Qu

en

tin Q

uin

ce9

:10

12:0

10:1

Ro

be

rt Ra

spb

erry

9:3

6:1

08:7

Ag

e E

qu

iva

len

t

Ach

ieve

ment

InC

AS

Y5

fee

db

ack

20

11

–2

01

2

Page 3: 2011-12 Y5 Feedback Example School - Centre for Evaluation ... May 2012/Primary/Primary... · Example School Y5 Feedback ... Charlie Clementine 9:10 11:8 11:8 Deadrie Damson 10:0

Pu

pil D

iffere

nce

Sco

res: A

ttain

me

nt (R

ea

din

g a

nd

Ge

ne

ral M

ath

s)5

Age

Nam

e(Yrs:M

ths)

ReadingGenMaths

Ad

am

Ap

ple

9:7

+0:3

+0:7

Be

rtie B

an

an

a9

:7+

2:7

+1:3

Ch

arlie

Cle

me

ntin

e9

:10

+1:1

0+

1:1

0

De

ad

rie D

am

son

10

:0-2

:5-0

:11

Eliza

be

th E

lde

rbe

rry9

:10

+1:3

+0:4

Fio

na

Fig

9:3

-0:8

+0:9

Ge

org

ia G

rap

e9

:9+

1:1

1+

0:4

Ha

rrold

Hu

ckle

be

rry9

:9+

0:5

+0:8

Jam

es Jo

job

a9

:0+

3:1

+2:0

Ke

vin

Kiw

i9

:10

+0:1

1+

1:7

Lau

ra Le

mo

n9

:1-0

:6-0

:3

Ma

rk M

an

go

9:5

+0:4

+0:2

Na

talie

Ne

ctarin

e9

:4+

1:3

+0:1

0

Oliv

ia O

live

9:1

+2:1

1+

1:8

Pa

ul P

ine

ap

ple

9:9

+0:1

1+

1:4

Qu

en

tin Q

uin

ce9

:10

+2:2

+0:3

Ro

be

rt Ra

spb

erry

9:3

-2:5

-0:8

Ach

ieve

ment

Ag

e E

qu

iva

len

t

Th

e fig

ure

s in th

ese

tab

les sh

ow

the

diffe

ren

ces b

etw

ee

n ch

ron

olo

gica

l ag

e a

nd

ag

e e

qu

ivale

nt

score

for e

ach

pu

pil.

InC

AS

Y5

fee

db

ack

20

11

–2

01

2

Pu

pil S

core

s: Re

ad

ing

Mo

du

les

6

A p

up

il will o

nly

be

pre

sen

ted

with

the

Co

mp

reh

en

sion

sectio

n if th

ey h

ave

score

d h

igh

en

ou

gh

in

the

Wo

rd R

eco

gn

ition

an

d D

eco

din

g se

ction

s. Th

ose

pu

pils w

ho

do

no

t ach

ieve

sufficie

ntly

hig

h

Wo

rd R

eco

gn

ition

an

d W

ord

De

cod

ing

score

s to a

ccess th

e C

om

pre

he

nsio

n m

od

ule

du

ring

the

asse

ssme

nt a

re cre

dite

d w

ith th

e m

inim

um

Co

mp

reh

en

sion

score

in th

e ca

lcula

tion

of th

e

com

po

site R

ea

din

g sco

re.

Age

Nam

e(Yrs:M

ths)

Word

RecogWord

Decod

Comprehension

Spelling

Ad

am

Ap

ple

9:7

10:7

10:0

9:3

10:4

Be

rtie B

an

an

a9

:711:3

14:1

12:2

12:4

Ch

arlie

Cle

me

ntin

e9

:10

11:0

11:7

12:2

10:7

De

ad

rie D

am

son

10

:06:9

7:5

8:1

6:7

Eliza

be

th E

lde

rbe

rry9

:10

11:5

10:2

11:2

11:4

Fio

na

Fig

9:3

9:2

7:1

08:5

8:3

Ge

org

ia G

rap

e9

:911:0

12:3

11:1

011:1

Ha

rrold

Hu

ckle

be

rry9

:910:6

11:5

9:6

9:1

1

Jam

es Jo

job

a9

:012:2

12:1

111:8

11:7

Ke

vin

Kiw

i9

:10

11:2

9:0

11:1

11:2

Lau

ra Le

mo

n9

:18:6

7:7

8:1

18:9

Ma

rk M

an

go

9:5

9:0

10:5

9:1

19:5

Na

talie

Ne

ctarin

e9

:410:4

11:2

10:7

10:9

Oliv

ia O

live

9:1

10:1

112:4

12:7

10:1

Pa

ul P

ine

ap

ple

9:9

10:5

11:6

10:6

10:4

Qu

en

tin Q

uin

ce9

:10

10:9

11:9

12:1

011:1

0

Ro

be

rt Re

sbe

rry9

:37:1

07:8

5:9

8:8

Ag

e E

qu

iva

len

t Sco

res

Reading M

odule

s

InC

AS

Y5

fee

db

ack

20

11

–2

01

2

Page 4: 2011-12 Y5 Feedback Example School - Centre for Evaluation ... May 2012/Primary/Primary... · Example School Y5 Feedback ... Charlie Clementine 9:10 11:8 11:8 Deadrie Damson 10:0

Pu

pil D

iffere

nce

Sco

res: R

ea

din

g M

od

ule

s

7

Age

Nam

e(Yrs:M

ths)

Word

RecogWord

Decod

Comprehension

Spelling

Ad

am

Ap

ple

9:7

+1:0

+0:5

-0:4

+0:9

Be

rtie B

an

an

a9

:7+

1:8

+4:6

+2:7

+2:9

Ch

arlie

Cle

me

ntin

e9

:10

+1:2

+1:9

+2:4

+0:8

De

ad

rie D

am

son

10

:0-3

:3-2

:7-1

:11

-3:5

Eliza

be

th E

lde

rbe

rry9

:10

+1:7

+0:4

+1:4

+1:6

Fio

na

Fig

9:3

-0:1

-1:5

-0:1

0-1

:0

Ge

org

ia G

rap

e9

:9+

1:3

+2:6

+2:1

+1:4

Ha

rrold

Hu

ckle

be

rry9

:9+

0:9

+1:8

-0:3

+0:2

Jam

es Jo

job

a9

:0+

3:2

+3:1

1+

2:8

+2:7

Ke

vin

Kiw

i9

:10

+1:4

-0:1

0+

1:3

+1:4

Lau

ra Le

mo

n9

:1-0

:7-1

:6-0

:2-0

:4

Ma

rk M

an

go

9:5

-0:5

+1:0

+0:6

0:0

Na

talie

Ne

ctarin

e9

:4+

1:0

+1:1

0+

1:3

+1:4

Oliv

ia O

live

9:1

+1:1

0+

3:3

+3:6

+1:0

Pa

ul P

ine

ap

ple

9:9

+0:8

+1:9

+0:9

+0:6

Qu

en

tin Q

uin

ce9

:10

+0:1

1+

1:1

1+

3:0

+2:0

Ro

be

rt Re

sbe

rry9

:3-1

:5-1

:7-3

:6-0

:7

Reading M

odule

sA

ge

Eq

uiv

ale

nt S

core

s

Th

e fig

ure

s in th

ese

tab

les sh

ow

the

diffe

ren

ces b

etw

ee

n ch

ron

olo

gica

l ag

e a

nd

ag

e e

qu

ivale

nt

score

for e

ach

pu

pil.

InC

AS

Y5

fee

db

ack

20

11

–2

01

2

Pu

pil S

core

s: Ge

ne

ral M

ath

s Mo

du

les

8

Ge

ne

ral M

ath

s is also

furth

er b

roke

n d

ow

n a

nd

score

s are

pro

du

ced

for fo

ur a

rea

s:

•N

um

be

r 1T

his co

vers co

un

ting

, info

rma

l arith

me

tic (i.e. a

nu

mb

er p

rob

lem

pre

sen

ted

as ‘H

ere

are

6 ice

crea

ms, if 3

are

take

n a

wa

y h

ow

ma

ny w

ou

ld b

e le

ft?'), p

artitio

nin

g a

nd

pla

ce va

lue

,

fractio

ns a

nd

de

cima

ls.

•N

um

be

r 2T

his co

vers so

rting

, pa

ttern

s, form

al a

rithm

etic, p

rob

lem

solv

ing

an

d a

lge

bra

.

•M

ea

sure

s, Sh

ap

e a

nd

Sp

ace

•H

an

dlin

g D

ata

Ea

ch p

up

il is pre

sen

ted

with

a ra

ng

e o

f Ge

ne

ral M

ath

s qu

estio

ns th

at g

ive a

n a

ccura

te o

vera

ll

estim

atio

n o

f his/h

er a

ttain

me

nt. H

ow

eve

r, wh

en

the

asse

ssme

nt is su

b-d

ivid

ed

into

the

fou

r

mo

du

les d

escrib

ed

ab

ove

, the

accu

racy

of e

ach

me

asu

re is n

ece

ssarily

low

er b

eca

use

the

y a

re b

ase

d

on

mu

ch fe

we

r qu

estio

ns.

Age

Nam

e(Yrs:M

ths)

Number1

Num

ber2

MSS

Data

Ad

am

Ap

ple

9:7

10:1

9:7

10:1

10:1

1

Be

rtie B

an

an

a9

:711:0

12:0

9:7

10:9

Ch

arlie

Cle

me

ntin

e9

:10

11:7

11:8

11:1

111:6

De

ad

rie D

am

son

10

:08:1

19:2

8:6

10:9

Eliza

be

th E

lde

rbe

rry9

:10

9:5

10:3

10:3

10:1

1

Fio

na

Fig

9:3

9:1

19:1

010:4

10:1

Ge

org

ia G

rap

e9

:910:0

10:4

9:8

10:1

Ha

rrold

Hu

ckle

be

rry9

:910:6

10:7

10:3

10:2

Jam

es Jo

job

a9

:011:2

12:1

11:8

9:5

Ke

vin

Kiw

i9

:10

11:2

11:6

11:4

11:8

Lau

ra Le

mo

n9

:18:3

9:6

8:8

9:2

Ma

rk M

an

go

9:5

9:7

9:7

9:1

19:0

Na

talie

Ne

ctarin

e9

:410:8

9:1

110:3

9:1

0

Oliv

ia O

live

9:1

10:4

11:5

10:7

10:8

Pa

ul P

ine

ap

ple

9:9

10:9

12:0

11:2

10:1

1

Qu

en

tin Q

uin

ce9

:10

10:9

9:7

8:1

010:9

Ro

be

rt Ra

spb

erry

9:3

8:3

8:1

17:7

9:5

Ag

e E

qu

iva

len

t Sco

res

Gene

ral Math

s Mod

ules

InC

AS

Y5

fee

db

ack

20

11

–2

01

2

Page 5: 2011-12 Y5 Feedback Example School - Centre for Evaluation ... May 2012/Primary/Primary... · Example School Y5 Feedback ... Charlie Clementine 9:10 11:8 11:8 Deadrie Damson 10:0

Pu

pil D

iffere

nce

Sco

res: G

en

era

l Ma

ths M

od

ule

s

9

Age

Nam

e(Yrs:M

ths)Number1

Number2

MSS

Data

Ad

am

Ap

ple

9:7

+0:6

0:0

+0:6

+1:4

Be

rtie B

an

an

a9

:7+

1:5

+2:5

0:0

+1:2

Ch

arlie

Cle

me

ntin

e9

:10

+1:9

+1:1

0+

2:1

+1:8

De

ad

rie D

am

son

10

:0-1

:1-0

:10

-1:6

+0:9

Eliza

be

th E

lde

rbe

rry9

:10

-0:5

+0:5

+0:5

+1:1

Fio

na

Fig

9:3

+0:8

+0:7

+1:1

+0:1

0

Ge

org

ia G

rap

e9

:9+

0:3

+0:7

-0:1

+0:4

Ha

rrold

Hu

ckle

be

rry9

:9+

0:9

+0:1

0+

0:6

+0:5

Jam

es Jo

job

a9

:0+

2:2

+3:1

+2:8

+0:5

Ke

vin

Kiw

i9

:10

+1:4

+1:8

+1:6

+1:1

0

Lau

ra Le

mo

n9

:1-0

:10

+0:5

-0:5

+0:1

Ma

rk M

an

go

9:5

+0:2

+0:2

+0:6

-0:5

Na

talie

Ne

ctarin

e9

:4+

1:4

+0:7

+0:1

1+

0:6

Oliv

ia O

live

9:1

+1:3

+2:4

+1:6

+1:7

Pa

ul P

ine

ap

ple

9:9

+1:0

+2:3

+1:5

+1:2

Qu

en

tin Q

uin

ce9

:10

+0:1

1-0

:3-1

:0+

0:1

1

Ro

be

rt Ra

spb

erry

9:3

-1:0

-0:4

-1:8

+0:2

Gene

ral Math

s Mod

ules

Ag

e E

qu

iva

len

t Sco

res

Th

e fig

ure

s in th

ese

tab

les sh

ow

the

diffe

ren

ces b

etw

ee

n ch

ron

olo

gica

l ag

e a

nd

ag

e e

qu

ivale

nt

score

for e

ach

pu

pil.

InC

AS

Y5

fee

db

ack

20

11

–2

01

2

Pu

pil S

core

s: Me

nta

l Arith

me

tic

Th

e M

en

tal A

rithm

etic a

ssessm

en

t is ma

de

up

of fo

ur su

bse

ction

s; Ad

ditio

n, S

ub

tractio

n,

Mu

ltiplica

tion

an

d D

ivisio

n.

A p

up

il will n

ot b

e p

rese

nte

d w

ith a

ll the

sub

sectio

ns o

f the

Me

nta

l arith

me

tic asse

ssme

nts if th

ey

ha

ve n

ot sco

red

hig

hly

en

ou

gh

in th

e p

revio

us se

ction

. All p

up

ils see

the

Ad

ditio

n se

ction

bu

t will o

nly

mo

ve o

n to

the

follo

win

g se

ction

s if the

ir score

me

et th

e fo

llow

ing

min

imu

m crite

ria:

oS

ub

tractio

n (If a

dd

ition

ag

e >

5)

oM

ultip

licatio

n (If su

btra

ction

ag

e >

7)

oD

ivisio

n (If m

ultip

licatio

n a

ge

> 8

)

If the

pu

pil h

as n

ot b

ee

n p

rese

nte

d w

ith th

e se

ction

s of th

e a

ssessm

en

t the

n a

n a

sterisk

will a

pp

ea

r

in th

e re

leva

nt co

lum

n in

the

tab

le.

10

Ag

e E

qu

iva

len

t Sco

res

Menta

l Arith

metic

Age

Nam

e(Yrs:M

ths)MentArith

Be

rtie B

an

an

a9

:79:1

0

Ch

arlie

Cle

me

ntin

e9

:10

10:5

Eliza

be

th E

lde

rbe

rry9

:10

9:3

Fio

na

Fig

9:3

8:8

Ge

org

ia G

rap

e9

:99:8

Ha

rrold

Hu

ckle

be

rry9

:99:8

Jam

es Jo

job

a9

:011:5

Ke

vin

Kiw

i9

:10

10:1

1

Lau

ra Le

mo

n9

:17:4

Ma

rk M

an

go

9:5

8:7

Na

talie

Ne

ctarin

e9

:410:3

Oliv

ia O

live

9:1

9:1

1

Pa

ul P

ine

ap

ple

9:9

10:4

Qu

en

tin Q

uin

ce9

:10

10:0

Ro

be

rt Ra

spb

erry

9:3

9:1

InC

AS

Y5

fee

db

ack

20

11

–2

01

2

Page 6: 2011-12 Y5 Feedback Example School - Centre for Evaluation ... May 2012/Primary/Primary... · Example School Y5 Feedback ... Charlie Clementine 9:10 11:8 11:8 Deadrie Damson 10:0

Pu

pil D

iffere

nce

Sco

res: M

en

tal A

rithm

etic

11

Ag

e E

qu

iva

len

t Sco

res

Menta

l Arith

metic

Age

Nam

e(Yrs:M

ths)MentArith

Be

rtie B

an

an

a9

:7+

0:3

Ch

arlie

Cle

me

ntin

e9

:10

+0:7

Eliza

be

th E

lde

rbe

rry9

:10

-0:7

Fio

na

Fig

9:3

-0:7

Ge

org

ia G

rap

e9

:9-0

:1

Ha

rrold

Hu

ckle

be

rry9

:9-0

:1

Jam

es Jo

job

a9

:0+

2:5

Ke

vin

Kiw

i9

:10

+1:1

Lau

ra Le

mo

n9

:1-1

:9

Ma

rk M

an

go

9:5

-0:1

0

Na

talie

Ne

ctarin

e9

:4+

0:1

1

Oliv

ia O

live

9:1

+0:1

0

Pa

ul P

ine

ap

ple

9:9

+0:7

Qu

en

tin Q

uin

ce9

:10

+0:2

Ro

be

rt Ra

spb

erry

9:3

-0:2

Th

e fig

ure

s in th

ese

tab

les sh

ow

the

diffe

ren

ces b

etw

ee

n ch

ron

olo

gica

l ag

e a

nd

ag

e e

qu

ivale

nt

score

for e

ach

pu

pil.

InC

AS

Y5

fee

db

ack

20

11

–2

01

2

Pu

pil S

core

s: Me

nta

l Arith

me

tic Mo

du

les

Th

e M

en

tal A

rithm

etic a

ssessm

en

t is ma

de

up

of fo

ur su

bse

ction

s; Ad

ditio

n, S

ub

tractio

n,

Mu

ltiplica

tion

an

d D

ivisio

n.

A p

up

il will n

ot b

e p

rese

nte

d w

ith a

ll the

sub

sectio

ns o

f the

Me

nta

l arith

me

tic asse

ssme

nts if th

ey

ha

ve n

ot sco

red

hig

hly

en

ou

gh

in th

e p

revio

us se

ction

. All p

up

ils see

the

Ad

ditio

n se

ction

bu

t will o

nly

mo

ve o

n to

the

follo

win

g se

ction

s if the

ir score

me

et th

e fo

llow

ing

min

imu

m crite

ria:

oS

ub

tractio

n (If a

dd

ition

ag

e >

5)

oM

ultip

licatio

n (If su

btra

ction

ag

e >

7)

oD

ivisio

n (If m

ultip

licatio

n a

ge

> 8

)

If the

pu

pil h

as n

ot b

ee

n p

rese

nte

d w

ith th

e se

ction

s of th

e a

ssessm

en

t the

n a

n a

sterisk

will a

pp

ea

r

in th

e re

leva

nt co

lum

n in

the

tab

le.

12

Age

Name

(Yrs:M

ths)

Additio

nSubtra

ctionMultiplic

atio

nDivision

Be

rtie B

an

an

a9

:710:0

9:8

9:1

19:1

0

Ch

arlie

Cle

me

ntin

e9

:10

12:1

110:1

9:9

10:8

Eliza

be

th E

lde

rbe

rry9

:10

9:0

9:3

9:1

09:0

Fio

na

Fig

9:3

8:5

8:1

08:2

9:9

Ge

org

ia G

rap

e9

:912:1

08:7

10:1

9:8

Ha

rrold

Hu

ckle

be

rry9

:99:2

9:9

9:1

110:0

Jam

es Jo

job

a9

:011:8

12:1

010:9

11:3

Ke

vin

Kiw

i9

:10

11:6

11:1

10:7

10:1

1

Lau

ra Le

mo

n9

:18:0

7:2

6:1

0*

Ma

rk M

an

go

9:5

8:1

8:1

18:6

8:9

Na

talie

Ne

ctarin

e9

:411:6

9:7

10:8

10:1

Oliv

ia O

live

9:1

9:1

010:6

9:2

10:2

Pa

ul P

ine

ap

ple

9:9

11:8

11:1

10:4

9:1

0

Qu

en

tin Q

uin

ce9

:10

11:5

9:7

9:2

10:6

Ro

be

rt Ra

spb

erry

9:3

8:9

9:3

8:1

09:6

Ag

e E

qu

iva

len

t Sco

res

Menta

l Arith

metic M

odule

s

InC

AS

Y5

fee

db

ack

20

11

–2

01

2

Page 7: 2011-12 Y5 Feedback Example School - Centre for Evaluation ... May 2012/Primary/Primary... · Example School Y5 Feedback ... Charlie Clementine 9:10 11:8 11:8 Deadrie Damson 10:0

Pu

pil D

iffere

nce

Sco

res: M

en

tal A

rithm

etic M

od

ule

s

13

Age

Name

(Yrs:M

ths)

Additio

nSubtra

ctionMultiplic

atio

nDivision

Be

rtie B

an

an

a9

:7+

0:5

+0:1

+0:4

+0:3

Ch

arlie

Cle

me

ntin

e9

:10

+3:1

+0:3

-0:1

+0:1

0

Eliza

be

th E

lde

rbe

rry9

:10

-0:1

0-0

:70:0

-0:1

0

Fio

na

Fig

9:3

-0:1

0-0

:5-1

:1+

0:6

Ge

org

ia G

rap

e9

:9+

3:1

-1:2

+0:4

-0:1

Ha

rrold

Hu

ckle

be

rry9

:9-0

:70:0

+0:2

+0:3

Jam

es Jo

job

a9

:0+

2:8

+3:1

0+

1:9

+2:3

Ke

vin

Kiw

i9

:10

+1:8

+1:3

+0:9

+1:1

Lau

ra Le

mo

n9

:1-1

:1-1

:11

-2:3

*

Ma

rk M

an

go

9:5

-1:4

-0:6

-0:1

1-0

:8

Na

talie

Ne

ctarin

e9

:4+

2:2

+0:3

+1:4

+0:9

Oliv

ia O

live

9:1

+0:9

+1:5

+0:1

+1:1

Pa

ul P

ine

ap

ple

9:9

+1:1

1+

1:4

+0:7

+0:1

Qu

en

tin Q

uin

ce9

:10

+1:7

-0:3

-0:8

+0:8

Ro

be

rt Ra

spb

erry

9:3

-0:6

0:0

-0:5

+0:3

Menta

l Arith

metic M

odule

sA

ge

Eq

uiv

ale

nt S

core

s

Th

e fig

ure

s in th

ese

tab

les sh

ow

the

diffe

ren

ces b

etw

ee

n ch

ron

olo

gica

l ag

e a

nd

ag

e e

qu

ivale

nt

score

for e

ach

pu

pil.

InC

AS

Y5

fee

db

ack

20

11

–2

01

2

Pu

pil S

core

s: De

ve

lop

ed

Ab

ility

14

Pictu

re V

oca

bu

lary

an

d N

on

-Ve

rba

l ab

ility a

re ta

ken

tog

eth

er to

give

an

ind

icatio

n o

f a p

up

il’s

‘De

velo

pe

d A

bility

’ wh

ich is th

e a

bility

of ch

ildre

n to

lea

rn. It is so

me

thin

g th

at th

ey h

ave

de

velo

pe

d

ove

r the

ir lifetim

e a

nd

the

y w

ill con

tinu

e to

de

velo

p. It is m

ea

sure

d b

y u

sing

a co

mb

ina

tion

of th

eir

lan

gu

ag

e a

cqu

isition

an

d n

on

-verb

al a

bility.

Ag

e E

qu

iva

len

t Sco

res

Deve

loped A

bility

Age

Nam

e(Yrs:M

ths)Develo

ped Ability

Ad

am

Ap

ple

9:7

12:2

Be

rtie B

an

an

a9

:713:1

Ch

arlie

Cle

me

ntin

e9

:10

13:7

De

ad

rie D

am

son

10

:010:2

Eliza

be

th E

lde

rbe

rry9

:10

11:2

Fio

na

Fig

9:3

9:8

Ge

org

ia G

rap

e9

:912:4

Ha

rrold

Hu

ckle

be

rry9

:912:5

Jam

es Jo

job

a9

:012:8

Ke

vin

Kiw

i9

:10

14:1

Lau

ra Le

mo

n9

:110:8

Ma

rk M

an

go

9:5

10:1

0

Na

talie

Ne

ctarin

e9

:412:4

Oliv

ia O

live

9:1

11:1

0

Pa

ul P

ine

ap

ple

9:9

11:6

Qu

en

tin Q

uin

ce9

:10

12:1

0

Ro

be

rt Ra

spb

erry

9:3

6:5

InC

AS

Y5

fee

db

ack

20

11

–2

01

2

Page 8: 2011-12 Y5 Feedback Example School - Centre for Evaluation ... May 2012/Primary/Primary... · Example School Y5 Feedback ... Charlie Clementine 9:10 11:8 11:8 Deadrie Damson 10:0

Pu

pil D

iffere

nce

Sco

res: D

ev

elo

pe

d A

bility

15

Ag

e E

qu

iva

len

t Sco

res

Deve

loped A

bility

Age

Nam

e(Yrs:M

ths)

Deve

loped Ability

Ad

am

Ap

ple

9:7

+2:7

Be

rtie B

an

an

a9

:7+

3:6

Ch

arlie

Cle

me

ntin

e9

:10

+3:9

De

ad

rie D

am

son

10

:0+

0:2

Eliza

be

th E

lde

rbe

rry9

:10

+1:4

Fio

na

Fig

9:3

+0:5

Ge

org

ia G

rap

e9

:9+

2:7

Ha

rrold

Hu

ckle

be

rry9

:9+

2:8

Jam

es Jo

job

a9

:0+

3:8

Ke

vin

Kiw

i9

:10

+4:3

Lau

ra Le

mo

n9

:1+

1:7

Ma

rk M

an

go

9:5

+1:5

Na

talie

Ne

ctarin

e9

:4+

3:0

Oliv

ia O

live

9:1

+2:9

Pa

ul P

ine

ap

ple

9:9

+1:9

Qu

en

tin Q

uin

ce9

:10

+3:0

Ro

be

rt Ra

spb

erry

9:3

-2:1

0

Th

e fig

ure

s in th

ese

tab

les sh

ow

the

diffe

ren

ces b

etw

ee

n ch

ron

olo

gica

l ag

e a

nd

ag

e e

qu

ivale

nt

score

for e

ach

pu

pil.

InC

AS

Y5

fee

db

ack

20

11

–2

01

2

Pu

pil S

core

s: De

ve

lop

ed

Ab

ility M

od

ule

s

16

Age

Nam

e(Yrs:M

ths)

PicVocab

NonVerb

al

Ad

am

Ap

ple

9:7

11:2

13:2

Be

rtie B

an

an

a9

:712:4

13:7

Ch

arlie

Cle

me

ntin

e9

:10

12:5

14:1

0

De

ad

rie D

am

son

10

:012:0

7:5

Eliza

be

th E

lde

rbe

rry9

:10

11:8

10:3

Fio

na

Fig

9:3

9:1

19:2

Ge

org

ia G

rap

e9

:914:4

9:3

Ha

rrold

Hu

ckle

be

rry9

:913:5

10:9

Jam

es Jo

job

a9

:013:1

11:1

0

Ke

vin

Kiw

i9

:10

13:1

113:1

0

Lau

ra Le

mo

n9

:110:1

010:3

Ma

rk M

an

go

9:5

10:5

11:2

Na

talie

Ne

ctarin

e9

:413:0

11:2

Oliv

ia O

live

9:1

12:7

10:7

Pa

ul P

ine

ap

ple

9:9

11:5

11:4

Qu

en

tin Q

uin

ce9

:10

12:9

12:8

Ro

be

rt Ra

spb

erry

9:3

8:4

3:1

0

Ag

e E

qu

iva

len

t Sco

res

Developed

Ability M

odules

InC

AS

Y5

fee

db

ack

20

11

–2

01

2

Page 9: 2011-12 Y5 Feedback Example School - Centre for Evaluation ... May 2012/Primary/Primary... · Example School Y5 Feedback ... Charlie Clementine 9:10 11:8 11:8 Deadrie Damson 10:0

Pu

pil S

core

s: De

ve

lop

ed

Ab

ility M

od

ule

s

17

Age

Nam

e(Yrs:M

ths)

PicVocab

NonVerb

al

Ad

am

Ap

ple

9:7

+1:7

+3:7

Be

rtie B

an

an

a9

:7+

2:9

+4:0

Ch

arlie

Cle

me

ntin

e9

:10

+2:7

+5:0

De

ad

rie D

am

son

10

:0+

2:0

-2:7

Eliza

be

th E

lde

rbe

rry9

:10

+1:1

0+

0:5

Fio

na

Fig

9:3

+0:8

-0:1

Ge

org

ia G

rap

e9

:9+

4:7

-0:6

Ha

rrold

Hu

ckle

be

rry9

:9+

3:8

+1:0

Jam

es Jo

job

a9

:0+

4:1

+2:1

0

Ke

vin

Kiw

i9

:10

+4:1

+4:0

Lau

ra Le

mo

n9

:1+

1:9

+1:2

Ma

rk M

an

go

9:5

+1:0

+1:9

Na

talie

Ne

ctarin

e9

:4+

3:8

+1:1

0

Oliv

ia O

live

9:1

+3:6

+1:6

Pa

ul P

ine

ap

ple

9:9

+1:8

+1:7

Qu

en

tin Q

uin

ce9

:10

+2:1

1+

2:1

0

Ro

be

rt Ra

spb

erry

9:3

-0:1

1-5

:5

Developed

Ability M

odules

Ag

e E

qu

iva

len

t Sco

res

Th

e fig

ure

s in th

ese

tab

les sh

ow

the

diffe

ren

ces b

etw

ee

n ch

ron

olo

gica

l ag

e a

nd

ag

e e

qu

ivale

nt

score

for e

ach

pu

pil.

InC

AS

Y5

fee

db

ack

20

11

–2

01

2

Pu

pil S

core

s: Attitu

de

s

18

Th

ere

is a ta

ble

for a

ttitud

e sco

res a

nd

in th

is tab

le th

ey a

re re

po

rted

on

a 5

-po

int sca

le w

ith 1

be

ing

very

ne

ga

tive a

nd

5 b

ein

g ve

ry p

ositive

.

Age

Nam

e(Yrs:M

ths)

ReadingMathsSchool

Be

rtie B

an

an

a9

:73

53

Ch

arlie

Cle

me

ntin

e9

:10

55

5

Eliza

be

th E

lde

rbe

rry9

:10

44

5

Fio

na

Fig

9:3

44

4

Ge

org

ia G

rap

e9

:95

45

Ha

rrold

Hu

ckle

be

rry9

:94

55

Jam

es Jo

job

a9

:05

54

Ke

vin

Kiw

i9

:10

54

5

Lau

ra Le

mo

n9

:14

44

Ma

rk M

an

go

9:5

52

4

Na

talie

Ne

ctarin

e9

:44

45

Oliv

ia O

live

9:1

54

5

Pa

ul P

ine

ap

ple

9:9

45

5

Qu

en

tin Q

uin

ce9

:10

53

5

Ro

be

rt Ra

spb

erry

9:3

33

5

Attitu

de

Sco

res

Attitud

es

InC

AS

Y5

fee

db

ack

20

11

–2

01

2

Page 10: 2011-12 Y5 Feedback Example School - Centre for Evaluation ... May 2012/Primary/Primary... · Example School Y5 Feedback ... Charlie Clementine 9:10 11:8 11:8 Deadrie Damson 10:0

Ag

e S

tan

da

rdise

d S

core

s

19

Th

e sco

res a

re sta

nd

ard

ised

with

a m

ea

n o

f 10

0 a

nd

stan

da

rd d

evia

tion

of 1

5. T

he

refo

re, a

child

with

an

ag

e sta

nd

ard

ised

score

of 1

00

is ave

rag

e fo

r his/h

er a

ge

.

InC

AS

Y5

fee

db

ack

20

11

–2

01

2

Mental

Develop

ed

Name

Read

ingRead

ing IM

GenM

athsArithm

eticAbility

Ad

am

Ap

ple

102

*108

*123

Be

rtie B

an

an

a123

*117

103

131

Ch

arlie

Cle

me

ntin

e116

*124

106

134

De

ad

rie D

am

son

78

*88

*102

Eliza

be

th E

lde

rbe

rry110

*104

93

112

Fio

na

Fig

93

*110

93

104

Ge

org

ia G

rap

e116

*104

99

123

Ha

rrold

Hu

ckle

be

rry103

*109

99

124

Jam

es Jo

job

a127

*127

129

133

Ke

vin

Kiw

i108

*121

112

138

Lau

ra Le

mo

n95

*97

78

115

Ma

rk M

an

go

102

*102

90

113

Na

talie

Ne

ctarin

e111

*111

110

127

Oliv

ia O

live

125

*122

110

125

Pa

ul P

ine

ap

ple

107

*118

107

115

Qu

en

tin Q

uin

ce119

*104

102

127

Ro

be

rt Ra

spb

erry

77

*91

98

75

Ag

e S

tan

da

rdise

d S

core

s

Lon

gitu

de

cha

rts

20

Th

e Lo

ng

itud

e C

ha

rts sho

w th

e p

rog

ress th

at a

child

ma

kes o

ver a

pe

riod

of tim

e a

nd

start to

be

com

e

valu

ab

le a

s pu

pils a

re a

ssesse

d ye

ar o

n ye

ar. T

he

ho

rizon

tal a

xis sho

ws th

e a

ge

of th

e p

up

il wh

ile th

e

vertica

l axis sh

ow

s the

ag

e e

qu

ivale

nt sco

re.

Th

e b

lack

dia

mo

nd

s rep

rese

nt a

pu

pil’s a

ge

eq

uiva

len

t score

at th

e tim

e o

f asse

ssme

nt a

nd

the

ba

rs

ab

ove

an

d b

elo

w th

e d

iam

on

ds re

pre

sen

t the

68

% co

nfid

en

ce in

terva

l.

Th

e g

ree

n lin

e is th

e p

up

il’s actu

al a

ge

at th

e tim

e o

f the

asse

ssme

nt. If th

e co

nfid

en

ce in

terva

l

ove

rlap

s the

gre

en

line

, the

ag

e e

qu

ivale

nt sco

re is n

ot sig

nifica

ntly

diffe

ren

t to th

e p

up

il’s

chro

no

log

ical a

ge

.

Occa

sion

ally, a

pu

pil’s sco

re o

n a

pre

vio

us a

ssessm

en

t will b

e h

igh

er th

an

his/h

er la

test sco

re. T

his is

usu

ally

with

in th

e co

nfid

en

ce in

terva

ls, an

d so

the

two

score

s are

no

t sign

ifican

tly d

iffere

nt. V

ery

rare

ly, this d

iffere

nce

will b

e a

sign

ifican

t on

e a

nd

this w

ou

ld te

nd

to a

pp

ly to

child

ren

with

spe

cial

ed

uca

tion

al n

ee

ds. It m

ay b

e th

at th

e p

up

il wa

s luck

y in

the

first asse

ssme

nt, se

lectin

g co

rrect

mu

ltiple

cho

ice a

nsw

ers b

y ch

an

ce a

nd

the

late

r asse

ssme

nt is a

mo

re a

ccura

te re

flectio

n o

f the

ir

ach

ieve

me

nt o

r ab

ility.

InC

AS

Y5

fee

db

ack

20

11

–2

01

2

Page 11: 2011-12 Y5 Feedback Example School - Centre for Evaluation ... May 2012/Primary/Primary... · Example School Y5 Feedback ... Charlie Clementine 9:10 11:8 11:8 Deadrie Damson 10:0

Lon

gitu

de

cha

rts: Ma

rk M

an

go

21

5 6 7 8 9

10

11

56

78

910

11

Age Equivalent Score

Ag

e

Rea

din

g R

ob

ert P

eek

(08/0

4/2

00

2)

7 8 9

10

11

56

78

910

11

Age Equivalent Score

Ag

e

Gen

Math

s R

ob

ert P

ee

k (0

8/0

4/2

002

)

6 7 8 9

10

78

910

11

Age Equivalent Score

Ag

e

Me

ntA

rith R

ob

ert P

eek

(08/0

4/2

00

2)

6 7 8 9

10

11

12

13

56

78

910

11

Age Equivalent Score

Ag

e

De

velo

pe

d A

bility

Ro

bert P

eek (0

8/0

4/2

002

)

Re

ad

ing

: Ma

rk M

an

go

(08

/04

/20

02

)

Ge

ne

ral M

ath

s: Ma

rk M

an

go

(08

/04

/20

02

)

Me

nta

l Arith

me

tic: Ma

rk M

an

go

(08

/04

/20

02

)

De

ve

lop

ed

Ab

ility: M

ark

Ma

ng

o (0

8/0

4/2

00

2)

InC

AS

Y5

fee

db

ack

20

11

–2

01

2

Sco

res ch

arts

22

Th

e S

core

s Ch

arts le

t you

see

the

full p

rofile

of a

child

in a

gra

ph

ical fo

rma

t.

Co

gn

itive p

rofile

cha

rts are

ava

ilab

le fo

r ea

ch m

od

ule

tha

t the

child

ha

s take

n a

s we

ll as a

ttitud

es

cha

rts.

Co

gn

itive

pro

file ch

arts

Co

gn

itive p

rofile

cha

rts de

tail th

e sco

res fo

r the

ran

ge

of a

vaila

ble

asse

ssme

nts in

term

s of a

ge

eq

uiva

len

cies. C

og

nitive

pro

file ch

arts sh

ow

the

ag

e e

qu

ivale

nt sco

re fo

r ea

ch m

od

ule

tha

t the

pu

pil

ha

s com

ple

ted

.

Th

e little

blu

e sq

ua

res sh

ow

the

ag

e e

qu

ivale

nt sco

res, a

nd

the

line

s ab

ove

an

d b

elo

w a

re th

e

con

fide

nce

inte

rvals. T

he

se sh

ow

the

ran

ge

of 1

stan

da

rd e

rror, w

ithin

wh

ich w

e a

re 6

8%

con

fide

nt

the

child

’s true

score

lies. O

n a

diffe

ren

t da

y, a p

up

il mig

ht h

ave

ha

d a

sligh

tly d

iffere

nt p

atte

rn o

f

resp

on

ses a

nd

the

refo

re a

chie

ved

a slig

htly

hig

he

r or lo

we

r score

. Th

e co

nfid

en

ce in

terva

ls give

an

ind

icatio

n o

f the

ran

ge

in w

hich

a ch

ild m

igh

t score

on

a d

iffere

nt d

ay.

Th

e g

ree

n lin

e is th

e p

up

il’s actu

al a

ge

at th

e tim

e o

f the

asse

ssme

nt. If th

e co

nfid

en

ce in

terva

l

ove

rlap

s the

gre

en

line

, the

ag

e e

qu

ivale

nt sco

re is n

ot sig

nifica

ntly

diffe

ren

t to th

e p

up

il’s

chro

no

log

ical a

ge

.

Attitu

de

s cha

rts

Attitu

de

s cha

rts sho

w th

e a

ttitud

e sco

res fo

r Re

ad

ing

, Ma

ths a

nd

Sch

oo

l. Th

ese

are

on

a sca

le fro

m

ne

ga

tive to

po

sitive. A

s with

the

cog

nitive

pro

file ch

arts, th

e re

d sq

ua

re re

pre

sen

ts the

attitu

de

score

an

d th

e lin

es a

bo

ve a

nd

be

low

are

the

con

fide

nce

inte

rvals.

InC

AS

Y5

fee

db

ack

20

11

–2

01

2

Page 12: 2011-12 Y5 Feedback Example School - Centre for Evaluation ... May 2012/Primary/Primary... · Example School Y5 Feedback ... Charlie Clementine 9:10 11:8 11:8 Deadrie Damson 10:0

Sco

res ch

arts: M

ark

Ma

ng

o

23

8 9

10

11

12

Deve

lope

d A

bility

27/0

9/2

011

09:5

1:0

0

Age Equivalent Score

De

ve

lop

ed

Ab

ility Y

5 Y

ea

r 5 R

ob

ert P

ee

k (0

8/0

4/2

00

2)

7 8 9

10

11

MentA

rith2

7/0

9/2

011

11:1

6:0

0

Age Equivalent Score

Me

nta

l Arith

me

tic Y

5 Y

ea

r 5 R

ob

ert P

ee

k (0

8/0

4/2

00

2)

8 9

10

11

Re

ad

ing

27/0

9/2

011

11:2

5:0

0G

en

Math

s2

7/0

9/2

011

10:2

5:0

0

Age Equivalent Score

Ac

hie

ve

me

nt Y

5 Y

ea

r 5 R

ob

ert P

ee

k (0

8/0

4/2

00

2)

8 9

10

11

12

13

Pic

Voca

b2

7/0

9/2

011

09:5

1:0

0N

on

Verb

al

27/0

9/2

011

10:0

2:0

0

Age Equivalent Score

De

ve

lop

ed

Ab

ility M

od

ule

s Y

5 Y

ea

r 5 R

ob

ert P

ee

k (0

8/0

4/2

00

2)

De

ve

lop

ed

Ab

ility: M

ark

Ma

ng

o (0

8/0

4/2

00

2)

Me

nta

l Arith

me

tic: Ma

rk M

an

go

(08

/04

/20

02

)

Ach

ieve

me

nt: M

ark

Ma

ng

o (0

8/0

4/2

00

2)

De

ve

lop

ed

Ab

ility M

od

ule

s: Ma

rk M

an

go

(08

/04

/20

02

)

InC

AS

Y5

fee

db

ack

20

11

–2

01

2

Sco

res ch

arts: M

ark

Ma

ng

o

24

Re

adin

g2

7/0

9/2

01

1 0

9:4

3:0

0M

ath

s2

7/0

9/2

01

1 0

9:4

3:0

0S

ch

oo

l2

7/0

9/2

01

1 0

9:4

3:0

0

Attitu

de

s Y

5 Y

ea

r 5 R

ob

ert P

ee

k (0

8/0

4/2

00

2)

Po

sitiv

e

Ne

ga

tive

Ne

utra

l

8 9

10

11

12

Word

Re

co

g2

7/0

9/2

011

11

:25

:00

Wo

rdD

eco

d2

7/0

9/2

01

1 1

1:3

0:0

0C

om

pre

he

nsio

n27

/09

/20

11

11

:37

:00

Sp

ellin

g0

4/1

0/2

011

14

:52

:00

Age Equivalent Score

Re

ad

ing

Mo

du

les

Y5

Ye

ar 5

Ro

be

rt Pe

ek

(08

/04

/20

02

)

7 8 9

10

11

Ad

ditio

n2

7/0

9/2

011

11

:16

:00

Su

btra

ctio

n2

7/0

9/2

01

1 1

1:1

6:0

0M

ultip

lica

tion

27

/09

/20

11

11

:16

:00

Div

isio

n2

7/0

9/2

011

11

:16

:00

Age Equivalent Score

Me

nta

l Arith

me

tic M

od

ule

s Y

5 Y

ea

r 5 R

ob

ert P

ee

k (0

8/0

4/2

00

2)

8 9

10

11

Nu

mb

er1

27

/09

/20

11

10

:25

:00

Nu

mb

er2

27

/09

/20

11

10

:25

:00

MS

S27

/09

/20

11

10

:25

:00

Da

ta2

7/0

9/2

011

10

:25

:00

Age Equivalent Score

Ge

ne

ral M

ath

s M

od

ule

s Y

5 Y

ea

r 5 R

ob

ert P

ee

k (0

8/0

4/2

00

2)

Attitu

de

s: Ma

rk M

an

go

(08

/04

/20

02

)

Re

ad

ing

Mo

du

les: M

ark

Ma

ng

o (0

8/0

4/2

00

2)

Me

nta

l Arith

me

tic Mo

du

les: M

ark

Ma

ng

o (0

8/0

4/2

00

2)

Ge

ne

ral M

ath

s Mo

du

les: M

ark

Ma

ng

o (0

8/0

4/2

00

2)

InC

AS

Y5

fee

db

ack

20

11

–2

01

2

Page 13: 2011-12 Y5 Feedback Example School - Centre for Evaluation ... May 2012/Primary/Primary... · Example School Y5 Feedback ... Charlie Clementine 9:10 11:8 11:8 Deadrie Damson 10:0

Ag

e C

om

pa

rison

Ch

arts: R

ea

din

g

25

Th

e a

ge

com

pa

rison

cha

rts sho

w h

ow

a cla

ss or ye

ar g

rou

p a

re p

erfo

rmin

g u

sing

bo

x an

d w

hiske

r

plo

ts.

Th

e g

ree

n lin

e is a

refe

ren

ce lin

e o

f chro

no

log

ical a

ge

aga

inst a

ge

eq

uiva

len

t score

s. Pu

pils a

bo

ve th

e

gre

en

line

ha

ve a

ge

eq

uiva

len

t score

s ab

ove

the

ir actu

al a

ge

. Th

ose

be

low

the

gre

en

line

are

the

op

po

site. W

he

re th

e lin

e is h

orizo

nta

l this is th

e a

vera

ge

ag

e fo

r the

coh

ort.

Th

e lin

e in

the

mid

dle

of th

e b

ox a

nd

wh

isker p

lots is th

e m

idd

le lin

e fo

r the

class o

r yea

r gro

up

an

d

the

score

s of h

alf o

f the

pu

pils w

ill lie w

ithin

the

bo

x for o

ne

yea

r gro

up

. It is inte

restin

g to

see

the

ran

ge

of sco

res fo

r ea

ch ye

ar g

rou

p o

r class a

nd

the

pro

gre

ssion

with

incre

asin

g a

ge

.

Th

e w

idth

s of th

e b

oxe

s are

diffe

ren

t. Th

e w

idth

s sho

w th

e ra

ng

e o

f ag

es fo

r the

mid

dle

ha

lf of th

e

class o

r yea

r gro

up

. Th

e h

orizo

nta

l po

sition

of th

e w

hiske

rs sho

w th

e m

idd

le a

ge

of th

e cla

ss or ye

ar

gro

up

.

As w

ith o

the

r asse

ssme

nts, In

CA

S h

as its lim

its an

d ca

n o

nly

pro

vid

e re

liab

le a

ge

eq

uiva

len

t score

s

be

twe

en

pa

rticula

r ag

e ra

ng

es. F

or e

xam

ple

, it do

es n

ot m

ake

sen

se to

give

a ch

ild a

rea

din

g a

ge

eq

uiva

len

t score

of 1

yea

r an

d 8

mo

nth

s. Th

ere

fore

, the

red

ho

rizon

tal lin

es o

n th

e a

ge

com

pa

rison

cha

rts rep

rese

nt th

e u

pp

er a

nd

low

er lim

its of th

e ra

ng

e o

f score

s tha

t InC

AS

can

pro

vid

e. Yo

u w

ill see

the

se re

d lin

es if th

e p

up

ils in yo

ur cla

ss or sch

oo

l ha

ve e

xtrem

ely

hig

h o

r low

ag

e e

qu

ivale

nt sco

res.

InC

AS

Y5

fee

db

ack

20

11

–2

01

2

Ag

e C

om

pa

rison

Ch

arts: R

ea

din

g

26

InC

AS

Y5

fee

db

ack

20

11

–2

01

2

Page 14: 2011-12 Y5 Feedback Example School - Centre for Evaluation ... May 2012/Primary/Primary... · Example School Y5 Feedback ... Charlie Clementine 9:10 11:8 11:8 Deadrie Damson 10:0

Ag

e C

om

pa

rison

Ch

arts: R

ea

din

g M

od

ule

s

27

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x xx

x

x

xx

x

x

x

xx

x

x

x

x

x

x xx

x

x

xx

x

x

x

xx

x

x

x

x

x

x xx

x

x

xx

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

xx x

x

x

xx

x

5 6 7 8 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

Age Equivalent Score (years)

As

se

ss

me

nt

Refe

rence

Upp

er L

imit

Lo

wer L

imit

Com

pre

he

nsi

on

Spellin

g

Word

Decod

Word

Recog

InC

AS

Y5

fee

db

ack

20

11

–2

01

2

Ag

e C

om

pa

rison

Ch

arts: G

en

era

l Ma

ths

28

InC

AS

Y5

fee

db

ack

20

11

–2

01

2

Page 15: 2011-12 Y5 Feedback Example School - Centre for Evaluation ... May 2012/Primary/Primary... · Example School Y5 Feedback ... Charlie Clementine 9:10 11:8 11:8 Deadrie Damson 10:0

Ag

e C

om

pa

rison

Ch

arts: G

en

era

l Ma

ths M

od

ule

s

29

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

xx x

x

x

x x

x

x

x

x

x

xx

x

x

x

xx x

x

x

x x

x

x

x

xx

x

x

x

x

x

x x x

x

x

xx

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

xx x

x

xxx

x

7 8 9

10

11

12

13

Age Equivalent Score (years)

As

se

ss

me

nt

Refe

rence

Upp

er L

imit

Lo

wer L

imit

Data

MS

S

Num

ber1

Num

ber2

InC

AS

Y5

fee

db

ack

20

11

–2

01

2

Ag

e C

om

pa

rison

Ch

arts: M

en

tal A

rithm

etic

30

7 8 9

10

11

12

91

0Age Equivalent Score (years)

Ag

e (Y

ea

rs)

Refe

rence

Upp

er L

imit

Lo

wer L

imit

Me

ntA

rith

InC

AS

Y5

fee

db

ack

20

11

–2

01

2

Page 16: 2011-12 Y5 Feedback Example School - Centre for Evaluation ... May 2012/Primary/Primary... · Example School Y5 Feedback ... Charlie Clementine 9:10 11:8 11:8 Deadrie Damson 10:0

Ag

e C

om

pa

rison

Ch

arts: M

en

tal A

rithm

etic M

od

ule

s

31

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x x x

x

x

x

x

x

x

<<<x<<

<

xx

x

x

x

x x x

xx

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

xx x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x x x

x

x

x

3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10

11

12

13

Age Equivalent Score (years)

As

se

ss

me

nt

Re

fere

nce

Up

per L

imit

Lo

wer L

imit

Ad

ditio

n

Divisio

n

Mu

ltiplic

atio

n

Su

btra

ctio

n

InC

AS

Y5

fee

db

ack

20

11

–2

01

2

Ag

e C

om

pa

rison

Ch

arts: M

en

tal A

rithm

etic S

ub

tractio

n

32

7 8 9

10

11

12

13

91

0

Age Equivalent Score (years)

Ag

e (Y

ea

rs)

Refe

rence

Upp

er L

imit

Lo

wer L

imit

Subtra

ctio

n

InC

AS

Y5

fee

db

ack

20

11

–2

01

2

Page 17: 2011-12 Y5 Feedback Example School - Centre for Evaluation ... May 2012/Primary/Primary... · Example School Y5 Feedback ... Charlie Clementine 9:10 11:8 11:8 Deadrie Damson 10:0

Ag

e C

om

pa

rison

Ch

arts: D

ev

elo

pe

d A

bility

Mo

du

les

33

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x x x

x

x

xx

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x x x

x

x

xx

x

3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

Age Equivalent Score (years)

As

se

ss

me

nt

Re

fere

nce

Up

pe

r Lim

it

Lo

we

r Lim

it

No

nV

erb

al

Pic

Vocab

InC

AS

Y5

fee

db

ack

20

11

–2

01

2

Ag

e C

om

pa

rison

Ch

arts: R

ea

din

g

34

4 5 6 7 8 9

10

11

12

13

14

56

78

91

01

11

21

3

Age Equivalent Score (years)

Ag

e (Y

ea

rs)

Refe

rence

Upp

er L

imit

Lo

wer L

imit

Y1

Y3

Y4

Y5

Y6

Y8

InC

AS

Y5

fee

db

ack

20

11

–2

01

2

Page 18: 2011-12 Y5 Feedback Example School - Centre for Evaluation ... May 2012/Primary/Primary... · Example School Y5 Feedback ... Charlie Clementine 9:10 11:8 11:8 Deadrie Damson 10:0

Ag

e C

om

pa

rison

Ch

arts: G

en

era

l Ma

ths

35

4 5 6 7 8 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

56

78

91

01

11

21

3

Age Equivalent Score (years)

Ag

e (Y

ea

rs)

Refe

rence

Upp

er L

imit

Lo

wer L

imit

Y1

Y3

Y4

Y5

Y6

Y8

InC

AS

Y5

fee

db

ack

20

11

–2

01

2

Ag

e C

om

pa

rison

Ch

arts: M

en

tal A

rithm

etic

36

3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10

11

12

13

56

78

91

01

1

Age Equivalent Score (years)

Ag

e (Y

ea

rs)

Refe

rence

Upp

er L

imit

Lo

wer L

imit

Y1

Y3

Y4

Y5

Y6

InC

AS

Y5

fee

db

ack

20

11

–2

01

2

Page 19: 2011-12 Y5 Feedback Example School - Centre for Evaluation ... May 2012/Primary/Primary... · Example School Y5 Feedback ... Charlie Clementine 9:10 11:8 11:8 Deadrie Damson 10:0

Ag

e C

om

pa

rison

Ch

arts: D

ev

elo

pe

d A

bility

37

3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

56

78

91

01

11

21

3

Age Equivalent Score (years)

Ag

e (Y

ea

rs)

Re

fere

nce

Up

per L

imit

Lo

wer L

imit

Y1

Y3

Y4

Y5

Y6

Y8

InC

AS

Y5

fee

db

ack

20

11

–2

01

2

Pu

pil R

ep

orts

38

Scho

ol:

Cla

ss :

Ye

ar 5

Pup

il:R

ob

ert P

ee

kD

ate

of B

irth :

08

-Ap

r-02

Ac

ad

em

ic Y

ea

rA

ge

Re

ad

ing

Re

ad

ing

(IM)

Ge

ne

ral M

ath

s

20

11

-20

12

9:5

9:9

*9

:7

20

10

-20

11

8:5

6:1

1*

8:9

20

08

-20

09

6:1

17

:4*

9:0

InC

AS

Sh

erfie

ld S

ch

oo

l

5 6 7 8 9

10

11

56

78

910

11

Age Equivalent Score

Age

Re

ad

ing

7 8 9

10

11

56

78

910

11

Age Equivalent Score

Age

Ge

ne

ral M

ath

s

Exa

mp

le S

cho

ol

Ma

rk M

an

go

Th

e p

up

il pro

gre

ss cha

rt con

sists of a

sing

le p

rinta

ble

pa

ge

tha

t sum

ma

rises a

ll of th

e In

CA

S

Re

ad

ing

an

d G

en

era

l Ma

ths sco

res fo

r a p

up

il ove

r a n

um

be

r of ye

ars. E

ach

pa

ge

con

sists of a

score

s tab

le a

nd

lon

gitu

din

al ch

arts. R

ea

din

g (IM

) refe

rs to re

ad

ing

asse

ssme

nts th

at h

ave

be

en

con

du

cted

in Irish

, an

d is o

nly

ava

ilab

le fo

r scho

ols in

No

rthe

rn Ire

lan

d.

InC

AS

Y5

fee

db

ack

20

11

–2

01

2