2012-04-19 copy of 3-5-09 stipulation converting subpoena to touhy demand in unrelated case w email...

8/2/2019 2012-04-19 Copy of 3-5-09 Stipulation Converting Subpoena to Touhy Demand in Unrelated Case w Email From Taitz

1/86

Case 3:12-cv-00280-HTW-LRA Document 6-14 Filed 04/27/12 Page 50 of 53


2/86



3/86



4/86



5/86



6/86



7/86



8/86



9/86



10/86



11/86



12/86



13/86



14/86



15/86



16/86



17/86



18/86



19/86



20/86



21/86



22/86



23/86



24/86



25/86



26/86



27/86



28/86



29/86



30/86



31/86



32/86



33/86



34/86



35/86



36/86



37/86



38/86



39/86



40/86



41/86



42/86



43/86



44/86



45/86



46/86



47/86



48/86



49/86



50/86



51/86



52/86



53/86



54/86



55/86



56/86



57/86



58/86



59/86



60/86



61/86



62/86



63/86



64/86



65/86



66/86



67/86



68/86



69/86



70/86



71/86



72/86



73/86



74/86



75/86



76/86



77/86



78/86



79/86



80/86



81/86



82/86



83/86



84/86


Renewal of Touhy stipulationInboxx

Orly TaitzDear Assistant attorney General Y oshinori Himel In 2009 US DO] and I, as ana ..Apr 15 (2 days ago)Dear Assistant attorney General Y oshinori Himel In 2009 US DO] and I, as an a ..Orly TaitzApr 15 (2 days ago)to Yoshinori, me, Fran, Harold, gilbert, nagamine, Justin, Laurie, leahlaxl234, Robert,Samuel, Scott, Tom

Dear Assistant attorney General Y oshinori HimelIn 2009 US DOJ and I, as an attorney for the plaintiffs in Keyes et al v Bowen, CASecretary of State, reached an agreement for the US DOJ to provide information underTouhy v Reagan regulation.Subsequent to signing the stipulation, Judge Kenney, presiding judge in Keyes v Bowen,abruptly dismissed the case, finding that it was moot, as it was filed after the generalelection. Upon dismissal ofthe case the Department of Justice sent a letter, stating thatthe Touhy agreement was moot as well, as the case was dismissed. Currently, a similarcase is filed and it will not be dismissed as moot as it was filed in February 2012, fu119months before the general election.Today the need for the information requested in the affidavit attached to the Touhyagreement, is even greater and more acute. I am providing for your review transcriptsfrom January 26,2012 hearing in Farrar v Obama in GA and a transcript of the pressconference of Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County, AZ.I represented plaintiffs in Farrar. Seven witnesses and experts attested lmder the penaltyof peljury to multiple signs of forgery in Mr. Obama's long form birth certificate postedby him on WhiteHouse.gov as well as to the fact that the Connecticut Social Security

m;ed by Mr. Obama in his tax returns and his selective servicecertificate was never assigned to him. Sheriff Arpaio confirmed the findings presented byme and my experts and witnesses in Farrar v Obama.Based on all of the above I an1 renewing my demand for production of records underTouhy v Ragan.Respectfully/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQAttachments1. Filed signed Touhy agreement between Department of Justice and Attorney Orly Taitzon behalf of Plaintiffs in Keyes et al v Bowen2. Draft of the affidavit. Fully executed signed and notarised affidavit was forwarded tothe department of Justice and was filed in the Superior Court of CA


85/86



86/86


2012-04-19 copy of 3-5-09 stipulation converting subpoena to touhy demand in unrelated case w email...

Documents